System Wide Federal Aviation Information Management · 2009-07-23 · Lab C S C S C S SA VPN. ......

Presented to:

By:

Date:

Federal AviationAdministrationSystem Wide

Information ManagementSegment 1B

Final Investment Decision

Members of the JRC

Ahmad Usmani, SWIM Program Manager

July 15, 2009

2Federal AviationAdministration

SWIM Segment 1B Final Investment DecisionJuly 15, 2009 2

Program Concept

SWIM will:• Implement a Service-Oriented Architecture

(SOA) in the NAS• Allow the FAA to create new system interfaces

more quickly and cheaper than is possible today

• Facilitate the data-sharing that is required for NextGen

SWIM is not:• A set of avionics equipment• A substitute for NAS modernization programs• An FTI replacement

SWIM is an IT infrastructure program that will operate in the background to provide data to authorized users



Business as Usual

HostWARP

IDS/ERIDS

ATOP

CIWS

TFMTMA

STARS/ARTS/TAMR

ERAM

ASDE

ETMS

Inter-Agency

Today

State of the System

- Existing point-to-point hardwired NAS- Unique interfaces, custom designs

- More point-to-pointunique interfaces- Costly development, test, maintenance, CM- New decisions linked to old data constructs- Cumbersome data access outside the NAS

Enterprise Management

LEGEND

SWIM Segment 1SWIM Future Segment

SWIM Adapter

FAA Systems

SWIM Compliant Non-Government

Systems

SWIM Compliant Government

SystemsFTI

TFMS

CIW

S

TDDS

ITWS

WMSCR

AIM

TBFM

DOTS

ERAM

CART

S/ST

ARS



Program Overview• IARD in September 2005, IID in July 2006• Nine Segment 1 capabilities were derived from

Communities of Interest, and a SWIM Business Case was presented to the JRC in June 2007

• SWIM received approval for FY09 and FY10 funding and associated activities at the June 2007 Final Investment Decision (FID)

• JRC direction to SWIM was to return in 2009 with refined cost estimates for review and approval by the JRC for the remaining years of SWIM Implementation. Based on development contractor estimates AJF recommends requesting funding for FY11 – FY15



SWIM Segment 1 COI Capabilities

AIM

SUA AutomatedData Exchange

Weather

CIWS Publication

ITWS Publication

PIREP Data Publication

Flight & Flow Management

Flight DataPublication

Terminal Data Distribution

Flow Information Publication

RVR Publication

RerouteData Exchange



SWIM Architecture with Core Services

SWIM FTI IP Network

TFMS TPC/ DRC

ARTCCs

Terminal Facilities(Selected TRACONs & ATCTs)

ATCSCC

To Non-NAS systems

WJHTC

TFMSSWIM

Registry Server

NAS Boundary Protection

Other LAN and WAN connectivity for these systems

Other LAN and WAN connectivity for these systems

SAMS CP

TDLS

EFSTS

ASDE-X

ERAM

WMSCR

SA

SA

SA

SA = Service Adapter

= LAN Cabling, Switches

CS = SWIM GFE software

SA

SA

SA

CS

CS

RVRSA

SWIM Test Facility and

Lab

CS

CS

CS

SA

VPN



SWIM High-Level Program ScheduleO N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S

SWIM PMORisk Adjusted

TDDSRisk Adjusted

TFMRisk Adjusted

ERAM Flight Data Publication

Risk Adjusted

AIMRisk Adjusted

ITWSRisk Adjusted

CIWSRisk Adjusted

WMSCRRisk Adjusted

Legend

FY14 FY15

Operations and Maintenance=Design= Key Site Test/Deployment=

FY08 FY09 FY10

DT&E=Code & Test= System Integration &Test=Requirements=

FY11 FY12 FY13

OT&E=

Design

HW Engineering and Deploy

Phase 1 HW Engr/Deployment

Operations and Maintenance




Ope

Engineering Support

Governance

WJHTC SIP Lab Support

SWIM Registry/Repository

TDDSTFM

ERAMAIM

ITWSCIWS

WMSCR

Technical GovernanceNAS Program Governance

Lab ManagementLab Operations

ImplementationOperations

Key Site TestRequirements DesignCode & TFM-Reroute Sys DT&E

Re Code & TestDesignTFM Flow Information Publication

RequDesign DT&E Key Site Test

Phase 1:Initial Flight Data Services

Requirements&DesignDesign Code & Test DT&E

RequirementsDesign Code and TestPhase 2:Initial Flight Data Services PUB/SUB

OT&EDT&E

Phase 3:HADDS/FDIO and AIM SUA

Requirements DesignCode and Test DT&E OT&E

RequirementsDesign Code & TestPhase 4:WMSCR,TDDS,TFMS Flow Clients

DT&E

IOC

IOC

IOC

Key Site Test

Key Site Test

Key Site Test

AIM Requirements Sys Int/train

ITWS Require Design Syst Int & Test

PrototypeCIWS Code & Test

WMSCR Syst Int & Test Key Site Test Requirements Key Site Test Design Code & Test

TFM RVR Publication

OT&E

Sys Int DT&E OT&ECode & Test Key Site Test

Code & TestSys OT&E

OT&E

OT&E

Code & Test OT&EDT&E

Code & Test DT&E OT&E

DT&E

DT&E OT&E

DeploymentProof of ConceptTDDSIOC

Operations and MaintenancRequirementsPrototype SystemDesign Code and TestSys Int Field IOT&DT&EOT&E Key



Decision Requested• Approve Segment 1B baseline for FY11 – FY15

– Proceed with development and deployment of remaining Segment 1 SWIM capabilities by TFM, ERAM, TDDS, WMSCR, CIWS and ITWS

– SWIM PMO to provide Governance to Segment 1 participants and oversight to SWIM Implementing Programs (SIPs) implementation of capabilities

• In-service decisions are delegated to SIPs• Request a single CIP line for both Segment 1A and

Segment 1B• Tech Refreshes needed after FY15 to be the

responsibility of the SIPs



Performance Gap / Justification• FAA Flight Plan: Organization Excellence

– Objective 2 – Improve Financial Management While Delivering Quality Customer Service

• Reduce costs to deliver data services via external gateway• Reduce application-to-application development costs• Provide shared situational awareness through Flight Data Publication• Improve collaborative decision making

• ATO Five-Year Strategy Goals– 4.1.3 Achieve adaptability and affordability through a common

automation platform• ATO SMP: Pathway 2 – Enhance Financial Discipline

– P2.4 Reduce unit cost and improve value of operations• Automation of manual processes for capturing weather reports and

updating SUA status• Cost avoidance by enabling early retirement of HADDS and FDIO



Metrics and Associated Milestones(Section I.C. Table 2 of Exhibit 300 Report)

N/AReduce cycle time by 10% over original baseline by FY11

Measure initial baseline in FY10

Frequency of SUA Management Status updates.

Cycle Time Processes and Activities

FY10 -FY14

Four products in FY09

10% increase over FY10 baseline

No products in FY08.

Number of data products provided via SWIM

AccessibilityTechnologyFY09 -FY14

Cost to develop interface is $1.63M - $22.2M depending on complexity of interface and number of sites needing adaptation

Reduce by5% in FY10, 10% in FY11, 15% in FY12

Initial baseline in FY07, refined baseline in FY08, FY09

Cost of developing an application-to-application I/F

Customer Impact or Burden

Customer Results

FY07 -FY14

Currently one userIncrease FY10 baseline by 25% in FY14

Establish baseline in FY09; refine in FY10

Number of users connected to secure gateway

Information Security

Mission and Business Results

FY09 –FY14

Actual ResultsPlanned

Improvements to the Baseline

BaselineMeasurement Indicator

Measurement Category

Measurement Area

Fiscal Year



SWIM Program Management Overview

• SWIM PO is responsible for:– Overall Program Cost and Schedule– SWIM System Engineering and Requirements Management– Definition and Maintenance of Program Level Agreements (PLAs)

with implementing programs– Governance of Segment 1 participants

• SIPs are responsible for:– Managing the development and deployment of allocated SWIM

requirements per the SWIM Final Program Requirements Document and in accordance with the SWIM Program Schedule

– Reporting progress against schedule, providing monthly EVM information to SWIM PO per PLAs



•Source: NAS Architecture 6 Website

NAS Enterprise Services Roadmap



System Interdependencies

• SWIM Segment 1 has interdependencies with the following systems:– CIWS– ERAM– ITWS– AIM (NASR,SAMS)– TDDS (FDIO, TDLS/PDC, NGRVR, EFSTS, ASDE-X)– TFMS– WMSCR– FTI



Risk Management

IRDs are under development; SWIM Implementation team is coordinating and overseeing review

Design for threads across domains will be coordinated early withSIPS by SWIM PMO

MediumDesign coordination needed across SIPs for interface standards

Cost estimate reflects these factorsPerform risk adjustment and coordinate with a risk adjusted schedule; establish reasonable risk ranges for all WBS elements

MediumCost estimate may understate true costs

Schedule risk adjustment reflects these risk factorsConduct schedule analysis; establish a risk adjusted schedule program implementation; consolidate contractor and government activities and plans

MediumSchedule estimate may be incorrect

SWIM Implementation team is overseeing design and specifications as they are developed

Increase the modularity of the software; decouple the information management software from the application software; use open systems software whenever possible

MediumSoftware maintenance (more software fixes than planned may be required)

SWIM CM is in place; requirements documents have change control mechanism in place

Ensure that the baseline requirements document is complete; follow change management guidelines to ensure that scope changes are minimized

MediumScope/Requirements creep of program

An implementation plan has been developed with strategies to mitigate this risk. SWIM has attended Design Reviews for AIM, CIWS, ITWS, and WMSCR.

Internal and external reviews will be held with SIPs to ensure compliance with functional requirements and production and deployment schedule

MediumComplexity of implementation

A SWIM implementation plan has been developed with strategies to mitigate this risk

Internal and external reviews are being held with the SIP contractors to ensure compliance with functional requirements and production and deployment schedule

MediumContract management

Security concept being developed by ATO-P; current security requirements are flowed to SIPs

Working with security to identify security requirements, and specifically, which ones are allocated to SWIM

HighSecurity implementation

Engineering prototype at WJHTC was used in requirements validation process; use cases completed

Develop use cases for every anticipated application Medium Unspecified / Changing Segment 1 requirements

Coordination and communication with DOT, OMB and industry is on-going

Frequent coordination and communication with DOT, OMB and industry helps manage expectations and achieves early buy-in

MediumExternal Pressure

SWIM is working with SIPs to identify interface scheduling issues and the SWIM Implementation Team is supporting early development of IRDs by SIPs

Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) is very flexible, allows adding of interfaces without affecting other interfaces. Interface Requirement Documents (IRDs) will define interfaces

MediumInterface integration: staggered interface implementation

Current StatusStrategy for MitigationRisk RatingDescription of Risk



Issues

• Commitment by SIP PMOs to make SWIM a priority when there are competing demands for resources– Cultural changes associated with Portfolio

Management



Decision Requested• Approve Segment 1B baseline for FY11 – FY15

– Proceed with development and deployment of remaining Segment 1 SWIM capabilities by TFM, ERAM, TDDS, WMSCR, CIWS, and ITWS

– SWIM PMO to provide Governance to Segment 1 participants and oversight to SIP implementation of capabilities

• In-service decisions are delegated to SIPs• Request a single CIP line for both Segment 1A and

Segment 1B• Tech Refreshes needed after FY15 to be the

responsibility of the SIPs

Date post:	16-Jun-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	buitram
View:	214 times
Download:	0 times