+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Team Members Daulet Urkenbayev Paul Orieukwu Jonathon Fulbright Rajeev Bhattacharya Advisors Project...

Team Members Daulet Urkenbayev Paul Orieukwu Jonathon Fulbright Rajeev Bhattacharya Advisors Project...

Date post: 18-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: silvester-wells
View: 215 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
38
Transcript
  • Slide 1
  • Slide 2
  • Team Members Daulet Urkenbayev Paul Orieukwu Jonathon Fulbright Rajeev Bhattacharya Advisors Project Manager Mechanical System Designer Frame & Body Designer Electrical System Designer 2 Instructor Raresh PascaliProfessor(University of Houston) Faculty Advisor Marcus GaminoEngineer I (3Dent Technology) Industry Advisor William Hesser Software Engineer ( Lime Instruments, LLC) Underclassman Matt WalshMECT (University of Houston) Alumni Ayazhan ZhakhanELET (University of Houston)
  • Slide 3
  • Presentation Outline 3 -The Formula Hybrid Competition -Competition Summary -Competition Events -Team Objective and Goals -What is a Hybrid? -Types of Hybrid -UH Formula Hybrid Design -Frame -Traction -Energy Storage -Drivetrain -Control -Project Management -Work Breakdown Structure -Gannt Chart -Budget
  • Slide 4
  • The Competition 4 -Annual Student Design Competition -Part of the Society of Automotive Engineers Collegiate Design Series -Founded by the Thayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth University -Open to graduate and undergraduate university students from all over the world -Emphasizes drivetrain innovation and interdisciplinary collaboration The Future on Track
  • Slide 5
  • Competition Summary 5 -April 27 th 2015 at the New Hampshire Motor Speedway in Loudon -Teams of university students are challenged to design, fabricate, and race a formula-style hybrid racecar -The teams will compete in time trials and head-to-head races 35 Open 30 Registered India Pakistan South Korea Canada USA Australia Turkey Competition Breakdown
  • Slide 6
  • Competition Events and Scoring 6 DYNAMICSTATIC
  • Slide 7
  • Team Objective and Goals 7 -Register before slots fill -Implement mixed hybrid drive -Curb weight bellow 1200 lbs. -Implement data logging system -Complete 246 ft (75 m) acceleration run in 5.4 seconds or less -Complete final assembly by April 1 Goals Objective : Team Red Devils endeavors to promote the University of Houston and College of Technology on an international stage by competing competitively at the SAEs Formula Hybrid Competition on April 27, 2015.
  • Slide 8
  • What is a Hybrid? 8 -Increased Efficiency -Lower Emissions -Limited Range -Long Range -Lower Efficiency -Higher Emissions
  • Slide 9
  • Types of Hybrid 9 Parallel: Higher power, but less efficient Series: Better efficiency, but less power
  • Slide 10
  • The Design 10 Main Systems -Frame -Electric Traction -Internal Combustion Traction -Drivetrain -Control
  • Slide 11
  • The Mixed Hybrid 11 The Red Devils will implement a mixed hybrid design that combines the power of a parallel hybrid with the efficiency of a series hybrid
  • Slide 12
  • Mixed Hybrid Layout 12 Series Hybrid ModeParallel Hybrid Mode High Efficiency Low Efficiency Low Driving Performance High Driving Performance
  • Slide 13
  • Presentation Outline 13 -UH Formula Hybrid Design -Material -Frame -Suspension -Finite Elemental Analysis
  • Slide 14
  • The Frame Material 14 Factor (Importance)Score (1-5) SteelAluminumCarbon Fiber Yield strength (5) 425 Weight (4) 435 Feasibility (3) 531 Cost (2) 451 Final Score 594150 Yield Strength = 710,684psi Modulus of elasticity = 33,000ksi Density:.055g/in 3 Price: $106.5/ft Yield Strength = 31,000psi Modulus of elasticity = 10,000ksi Density:.0975 lb/in 3 Price: $20/ft Yield Strength = 50,800psi Modulus of elasticity = 29,700ksi Density: 2.48lb/in 3 Price: $44/ft
  • Slide 15
  • The Frame Design 15 Factor (Importance)Score (1-5) Frame 1Frame 2Frame 3 Safe (5) 225 Design (4) 325 Weight (3) 433 Feasibility (2) 434 Final Score 423362 Frame 1Frame 2Frame 3
  • Slide 16
  • The Frame Suspension Design 16 To Design an optimal frame for the competition the team needed to determine the best suspension geometry Considerations: Track Width Camber Roll Center Center of Gravity Rim Diameter Chassis Dimension Kingpin Angle Ride Height
  • Slide 17
  • The Frame FEA 17 Von Mises (psi) Side Impact - 15 mph Von Mises (psi) Front Impact - 24 mph
  • Slide 18
  • Presentation Outline 18 -UH Formula Hybrid Design -Motors -Controllers -Batteries -Battery Management System
  • Slide 19
  • Traction Electric 19 Perm PMG 132 -Type: Brushed DC -Power: 19 HP -Max Torque: 15 ft-lb -Cost: Donated AC 12 -Type: AC Induction -Power: 44 HP -Max Torque: 100 ft-lb -Cost: Donated
  • Slide 20
  • Control 20 -Motor Control -1 per motor -1x AC Controller -2x DC Controller -Central Control -Controls Motor Controllers and IC Engine
  • Slide 21
  • Control Motor Controllers 21 Front Motor Controller Kelly KDZ12401 Type: DC Regen: Yes Price: $479 Rear Motor Controller Curtis 1239E Type: AC Regen: Yes Price: $1,562 (Donated)
  • Slide 22
  • Control DC Motor Controllers 22 Factor (Importance)Score (1-5) Kelly KDZ12401Kelly KDZ12400RoboteQ HDC2472 Current (3)442 Regen (5)500 Cost (3)345 Final Score462421 Kelly KDZ12401 Voltage: 18-120 V Current: 400 A Price: $595 Kelly KDZ12400 Voltage: 18-120 V Current: 400 A Price: $419 RoboteQ HDC2472 Voltage: =< 72 V Current: 120 A / Ch Price : $795
  • Slide 23
  • Control Central Processor 23 Factor (Importance)Score (1-5) ArduinoRaspberry PimyRio I/O(3)415 Software (2)324 Cost (1)551 Final Score171224 Arduino Mega I/O: 54 Software: Arduino IDE Price: $30 Rasberry Pi B+ I/O: 40 Software: Python IDE Price: $70 myRio I/O: 40 Software: LabView Price : $250
  • Slide 24
  • Energy Storage 24 Factor (Importance)Score (1-5) Lithium PolymerLead AcidLiFePO4 Specific Energy(4)514 Discharge (4)524 Cost (5)143 Final Score253247 LiPo Pouch Specific Energy: 100-265 Wh/Kg Discharge: 20C Price: $5,000 Lead Acid Specific Energy: 33-42 Wh/Kg Discharge: 1C Price: $1,000 myRio Specific Energy: 90-100 Wh/Kg Discharge: 10C Price : $3,000
  • Slide 25
  • Energy Management 25 Factor (Importance)Score (1-5) Orion BMSLithiumate CAN Interface(3)55 I/O (4)55 Cost (5)23 Final Score4550 Orion BMS Interface: Dual CAN Output: Analog Price: $890 Lithiumate Interface: CAN Output: Analog Price: $795
  • Slide 26
  • Presentation Outline 26 -UH Formula Hybrid Design -Internal Combustion Engine -Calculations -Differential -Drivetrain Design
  • Slide 27
  • Traction Internal Combustion 27 Kawasaki Ninja 250R Power Output: 37 Hp Price (used): $450- $650 Subaru EX21 Power Output: 7 Hp Price (New): $479.97 Lifan 250cc V-Twin Engine Power Output: 16.5 Hp Price (used): $625 Factor (Importance)Score (1-5) Subaru EX21Lifan V-Twin EngineKawasaki 250R Torque (5)235 Power (Output) (4)235 Cost (3)534 Final Score334257
  • Slide 28
  • Calculations 28 Calculations to know how much force the differential will experience Final Drive Reduction 1 2
  • Slide 29
  • Drivetrain - Differential 29 Westgarage Engineering Torque: 450 ft-lb Weight: 10 lb Cost: $1000 Torsen Traction-JTEKT Torque: 380 ft-lb Weight: 15 lb Cost: $650 Taylor Industries Torque: 550 ft-lb Weight: 10 lb Cost: $2600 Factor (Importance)Score (1-5) Taylor IndustriesTorsen TractionWestgarage Engineering Torque (4)534 Weight (5)325 Cost (3)254 Final Score41 53
  • Slide 30
  • Drivetrain UH Mixed Hybrid 1.Internal Combustion Engine 2.Electric Motor 3.Electric Clutch (ON/OFF) [PARALLEL/SERIES] 4.Differential The internal combustion engine and the AC electric motor provide power to the differential in parallel mode. When in series mode the electric clutch disengages and the Internal Combustion Engine generates power through the AC 12. 30
  • Slide 31
  • Presentation Outline 31 -Project Management -Project Completion -Work Breakdown Structure -Gantt Chart -Risk Matrix -Budget
  • Slide 32
  • Project Management 32 Current Progress Phase 1 91% Phase 2 12% Total 26% Projected Progress by Years End Phase 1 100% Phase 2 20% Total 30%
  • Slide 33
  • Work Breakdown Structure 33
  • Slide 34
  • Gannt Chart 34
  • Slide 35
  • Risk Matrix 35 Risk Matrix
  • Slide 36
  • Budget 36 ComponentsLowHigh Frame and Body $300$2,500 Steel Tubing$300$600 Fiberglass ShellDonated$400 Cost of ConstructionDonated$1,500 Internal Combustion $630$2,700 Engine$450$2,000 Upgrades and ModificationsExcluded$300 Hoses and Connections$80$100 Exhaust$100$300 Electrical System $5,650$16,200 DC Electric MotorsDonated$2,000 DC Electric Motor Controllers$1,400$2,000 AC Induction MotorDonated$1,200 AC Induction Motor ControllerDonated$3,000 Input/output Transducers$800$2,000 Cables and Connections$200$500 Batteries and Battery Management System$3,000$5,000 Central Controller$250$500 Drivetrain and Suspension $1,800$7,200 Axels, Bearings, and CV Connections$500$2,000 Chains and Sprockets$300$600 Differential and Electric Clutch$1,000$3,000 Wheels and TiresDonated$1,600 Travel Expenses $0$4,400 Truck and Trailer RentalDonated$1,200 Lodging and FoodDonated$1,200 GasDonated$2,000 Entry Fee $2,150 Total$10,530$35,150
  • Slide 37
  • Questions? 37 Comments?
  • Slide 38
  • Mid-Project Movie 38

Recommended