| Date post: | 04-Jul-2015 |
| Category: |
Investor Relations |
| Upload: | rocky-mountain-rare-metal-belt |
| View: | 488 times |
| Download: | 6 times |
2. TABLE OF CONTENTSITEM 3: SUMMARY.......................................................................................................................... - 1 -ITEM 4: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... - 2 -ITEM 5: RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS ................................................................................. - 2 -ITEM 6: PROPERY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION ................................................................. - 2 -ITEM 7: ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, ................................................... - 3 -INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY .................................................................................... - 3 -ITEM 8: HISTORY ............................................................................................................................ - 4 -ITEM 9: GEOLOGIC SETTING ....................................................................................................... - 7 -ITEM 9A: REGIONAL GEOLOGY ................................................................................................. - 7 -ITEM 9B: PROPERTY GEOLOGY ................................................................................................. - 7 -ITEM 10: DEPOSIT TYPE.............................................................................................................. - 8 -ITEM 11: MINERALIZATION ....................................................................................................... - 9 -ITEM 12: EXPLORATION ............................................................................................................. - 9 -ITEM 13: DRILLING .................................................................................................................... - 11 -ITEM 14: SAMPLING METHOD AND APPROACH................................................................. - 12 -ITEM 15: SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY ....................................... - 14 -ITEM 16: DATA VERIFICATION ............................................................................................... - 15 -ITEM 17: ADJACENT PROPERTIES ......................................................................................... - 16 -ITEM 18: MINERAL PROCESSING AND MEALLURGICAL TESTING ............................... - 16 -ITEM 19: MINERAL RESOURCES AND MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATES ..................... - 16 -ITEM 20: OTHER RELEVENT DATA AND INFORMATION ................................................. - 16 -ITEM 21: INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS .............................................................. - 17 -ITEM 22: RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................... - 17 -ITEM 23: REFERENCES ............................................................................................................. - 20 -ITEM 24: DATE AND SIGNATURE PAGE ................................................................................ - 21 -ITEM 25: ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR TECHNICAL REPORTS ONDEVELOPMENT PROPERTIES AND PRODUCTION PROPERTIES .......................................... - 22 -ITEM 26: ILLUSTRATIONS ............................................................................................................... Ii 3. LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS PageFigure 6.1Location Map ............................................................................................... At endFigure 6.2Property Map ............................................................................................... At endFigure 8.1Location of Historic Mineral Claims..............................................................At endFigure 8.2Location of Historic Exploration Grids ..........................................................At endFigure 8.3George Grid Niobium Soil Geochemistry, Historic Samples......................At endFigure 8.4George Grid Cerium Soil Geochemistry, Historic Samples ....................... At endFigure 8.5George Grid Barium Soil Geochemistry, Historic Samples ....................... At endFigure 8.6George Grid Niobium and REE Rock andSoil Geochemistry, Historic Samples .............................................. At endFigure 8.7George Grid Magnetometer Survey, Historic ............................................ At endFigure 8.8Prince Grid Niobium Soil Geochemistry, Historic Samples .......................At endFigure 8.9Prince Grid Cerium Soil Geochemistry, Historic Samples ......................... At endFigure 8.10 Prince Grid Barium Soil Geochemistry, Historic Samples ......................... At endFigure 8.11 Prince Grid Niobium and REE Rock and Soil Geochemistry,Historic Samples, Carbo Property...................................................At endFigure 8.12 Prince Grid Niobium and REE Rock Geochemistry,Historic Samples, Adjacent Property .............................................. At endFigure 8.13 Prince Grid Magnetometer Survey, Historic .............................................. At endFigure 8.14 D Grid Niobium Soil Geochemistry, Historic Samples ............................... At endFigure 8.15 D Grid Cerium Soil Geochemistry, Historic Samples ................................ At endFigure 8.16 D Grid Barium Soil Geochemistry, Historic Samples................................. At endFigure 9.1Regional Geology ........................................................................................ At endFigure 9.2George Grid Property Geology ................................................................. At endFigure 9.3Prince Grid Property Geology ................................................................... At endFigure 12.1 2006-2007 Sampling Niobium Soil Geochemistry ....................................At endFigure 12.2 2006-2007 Sampling Cerium Soil Geochemistry .....................................At endFigure 12.3 2006-2007 Sampling Barium Soil Geochemistry....................................... At endFigure 12.4 2006-2007 Sampling Niobium Rock Geochemistry ................................... At endFigure 12.5 2006-2007 Sampling REE Rock Geochemistry ........................................At endFigure 12.6 2006-2007 Work Magnetometer Survey ................................................... At endFigure 12.7 2006-2007 Work Scintillometer Survey ..................................................... At endFigure 12.8 2006-2007 Sampling Gold anomaly and Verification ................................At endii 4. LIST OF TABLES PageTable 1Carbo Property ............................................................................................3Table 2Expenditures between 2006 and 2009 ........................................................ 10Table 3Proposed Exploration of the Carbo Property ...............................................19LIST OF APPENDICES PageAppendix 1 Location of Rock Samples. A1Appendix 2 Location of Soil Samples... .. A3Appendix 3 Acme Analytical Laboratories Ltd. AnalyticalResults. ................ A4 iii 5. ITEM 3: SUMMARY The Carbo Property encompasses a series of Niobium and Rare Earth Element bearingcarbonatite and alkaline intrusions, located about 80 km northeast of Prince George and 50 kmeast of Bear Lake, British Columbia. The property was acquired during 2005 and 2006, by JodyDahrouge, on behalf of Commerce Resources Corporation (Commerce). It consists of fourclaims: Carbo1, Carbo2, Carbo3 and Carbo West, totalling 14.63 sq. km. The property is subject to a mineral property option agreement dated February 10, 2009between Commerce and Canadian International Minerals Inc. (CIN). Under the terms of theagreement, CIN will acquire a 75% interest in and to the Carbo Claims, subject to regulatoryapproval. The property is underlain by Cambrian Kechika Group sedimentary rocks, which consistmainly of interbedded limestone with calcareous argillite and phyllite. Several dike-like or sill-like,carbonatite and alkaline intrusions with associated Niobium and Rare Earth Element (REE)mineralization were identified at the property,and adjacent areas. The mineralized intrusives outcrop intermittently across several kilometres strike length atBear Ridge, a northwest trending ridge with several hundred meters relief above the localtopography. The mineralization includes radiometric anomalies, soil geochemical anomalies, andgrab samples from outcrops and trenches. The soil geochemical anomalies are enriched in thelight REEs (La, Ce, Pr, Nd), and locally exceed 2,000 ppm Cerium. Soil geochemical anomalismis also noted for Niobium, with values in excess of 3,000 ppm Niobium. The soil anomaliescoincide with or are partly displaced downslope from buried outcrops of carbonatite and/oralkaline intrusions. Mineralized outcrops have returned from 0.09 to 0.20% Nb2O5, and trenches from backgroundvalues to 0.95% Nb2O5. Historic samples from trenches within claim Carbo2 also returned frombackground concentrations to 8.37% P2O5 and generally less than 0.5% total REEs + Y. Less than 600 carbonatite occurrences are known worldwide. They are or have yielded avariety of commodities that include: Niobium, REEs, Phosphate, Vermiculite, and Copper. The Carbo Property is considered an early stage of exploration project for Niobium and REEmineralization; and is of sufficient merit to warrant further exploration. Geological mapping,trenching and a small drilling program are proposed to continue evaluated the knownmineralization at the property. The exploration proposed herein, is estimated to costapproximately $197,500, not including GST. -1- 6. ITEM 4: INTRODUCTION The author has been retained by Canadian International Minerals Inc. to prepare anindependent technical review of the Carbo Property. The purpose of this report is to review theexploration potential of the Carbo Property and recommend further work, if warranted. This reporthas been prepared in compliance with the standards outlined in National Instrument 43-101, forthe Canadian Securities Administration. The information used in the preparation of this technical report includes public assessmentreports, maps, academic publications, and results of exploration work conducted by DahrougeGeological Consulting Ltd. (Dahrouge) during 2006 and 2007. A detailed summary of these itemsis provided in the section entitled Item 23:References. The author planned and supervised the exploration of the Carbo Property, while andemployee of Dahrouge, and personally visited the property from May 30, 2006 to June 16, 2006and June 11, 2007 to June 16, 2007.ITEM 5:RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS This technical report is based upon both published and unpublished data, which includeshistoric third party reports. Although authors with post second degrees in geology prepared themajority of the historic third party reports and supervised the historic exploration work describedherein, the author does not take responsibly for the accuracy of this information. The author reviewed the tenure and ownership of the Carbo Property as available from theBritish Columbia Energy and Mines online mineral tenure system, Mineral Title Online BC (MTO),and believes the information to be reliable. The author is unaware of any outstanding environmental or other liabilities relating to theproperty.ITEM 6:PROPERY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION The Carbo Property encompasses about 14.63 sq. km, situated within the Cariboo MiningDivision (Figure 6.1; Table 1). Throughout this report the term Carbo Property refers to the fourmineral claims, Carbo1 (515430), Carbo2 (515432) and Carbo3 (515433) and Carbo West(536347) (Figure 6.2). The Carbo Property is located southeast of Whicheeda Lake between Wicheika Creek and -2- 7. Parsnip River, 80 km northeast of Prince George and 50 km east of Bear Lake, British Columbia.Most of the property is within NTS map area 93J/08, only a small part of claim Carbo3 lies within93J/09 (Figure 6.1). The property is centered at approximately 54 30 N latitude and 120 03 Wlongitude. The current Carbo Property was staked in June 2005 and June 2006 by Jody Dahrouge onbehalf of Commerce. Sufficient work has been completed to keep the Carbo Property in goodstanding to Dec. 31, 2012.Table 1: List of Mineral Claims Tenure NumberClaim Name Map NumberGood To Date Mining Division Area (ha) 515430 Carbo1093J09 2012/DEC/31CARIBOO 469 515432 Carbo2093J09 2012/DEC/31CARIBOO 469 515433 Carbo3 093J09/08 2012/DEC/31CARIBOO 187 536347 Carbo West093J09 2012DEC/31 CARIBOO 338 On February 10, 2009 Commerce Resources Corp. (Commerce) entered into a MineralProperty Option Agreement with Canadian International Minerals Inc. (CIN) in respect of theCarbo Property. Under the terms of the agreement, CIN will acquire a 75% interest in and to theCarbo Claims, subject to regulatory approval. In consideration for the interest in the CarboClaims, CIN will pay to Commerce a total of $30,000 cash: $10,000 on signing of the agreement(paid), $10,000 on the first year anniversary and $10,000 on the second year anniversary. CINwill also issue the Company a total of 1,500,000 common shares: 500,000 common shares withfive days of the filing of the property acquisition with the regulatory authorities, 500,000 commonshares on the first year anniversary and 500,000 common shares on the second yearanniversary. CIN is also required to incur a total of $198,000 in exploration expenditures on theCarbo Claims: $66,000 in the first year of the agreement, $66,000 in the second year and $66,000in the third year. The Company will also retain a 2% NSR Royalty on the Carbo Claims(Commerce Resources Corp., 2009).ITEM 7:ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY The Carbo Property is located about 80 km northeast of the city of Prince George and 50 km -3- 8. east of the village of Bear Lake, British Columbia. Bear Lake is accessible from B.C. Highway 97(Figure 6.1), and the property can be reached from Bear Lake along local No. 700 gravel road,which branches from Highway 97 at the village. Trails and logging roads provide access to thenortheast and southwest edges of the property. The main line of the Canadian National Railwaypasses through Bear Lake. Limited supplies and accommodations are available at Bear Lake. Summers tend to be warm and dry; winters cooler, but less moist. Local temperatureextremes range from -30 to +30C, with normal ranges from -15 to 25C. Within the upperreaches of the property, partial snow cover may last until the middle June. The Carbo Property is between 900 m and 1520 m elevation above sea level, and coversportions of a northerly trending ridge that is several kilometres in length, termed Bear Ridge.Slopes are moderately steep and typically covered by thick undergrowth consisting of buck brushand devils club at lower elevations. Areas along the ridge are covered by alder and white pine. Infrastructure within the property is poor with logging roads leading to the edges of theproperty only. Access within the property is by foot or helicopter. The area is considered sparselypopulated and historically is reliant on the lumber industry. In recent years the lumber industryhas suffered due to the Pine Beetle infestation. Bear Lake (pop. 170) is the nearest community tothe property, and at best, provides basic accommodations and supplies. Future exploration canbe based in Bear Lake, while most supplies can be obtained from Prince George.ITEM 8:HISTORY In 1961 the Geophysics Division of the Geological Survey of Canada completed a 1:63360scale aeromagnetic survey across parts of British Columbia. A significant magnetic anomaly wasidentified on what is currently the Carbo Property (GSC, Geophysics Paper 1546, 1964). In 1976 and 1977 Kol Lovang prospected the area and staked two claims on minor base metalshowings, but no follow-up was reported and the claims were permitted to lapse. Later assayingof Lovangs samples by Teck Corporation indicated anomalous values of Niobium (Betmanis A.I.,1987). During April, 1986, Teck Exploration Limited staked the initial 4 Ole claims (Ole 1 to Ole 4)after entering an agreement with Lovang, seven more claims were staked during and after theexploration work during 1986: PG1, PG2, Fata, Morgana, Prince, Lake and George. All 11 claimswere continuous and grouped into the Prince and George groups (Figure 8.1). Teck Corporationacted as operated of the 1986 exploration, which included a stream silt geochemical survey, -4- 9. geological mapping, geochemical soil sampling, a magnetic surveying and limited trenching. Theexploration located carbonatitic and syentitic intrusions at the Prince George and Prince grids.Three rock samples from trench PT 5-7 returned high concentrations of Niobium and REE values.One sample from trench pit-6 returned approximately 0.95% Nb2O5. In 1988, Mader and Greenwood. conducted an academic field survey which focused on thecarbonatites and related rocks. They provide a detailed description and map of the carbonatites inthe area. Historic exploration data from Teck Exploration Limited has been compiled andgeoreferenced in a GIS database. Teck established five exploration grids during 1986: GeorgeGrid, Prince Grid, Lake Grid, D Grid and F Grid. The George Grid, Prince Grid and D Grid areentirely or partially within the Carbo Property. The Lake and F grids are within an adjacentproperty (Figure 8.2). Some information on these grids from Teck Exploration Ltd.s historic work,include information on adjacent claims. These historic claims are located to the north and south ofthe current Carbo Property and are currently covered by claims owned by Spectrum Mining Corp.(Figure 8.2). All of the maps in Section 8: History of this report clearly define the propertyboundary of the current Carbo claims. The author has not verified the results reported in theseadjacent claims, and the information reported on these claims is not necessarily indicativeof the mineralization on the Carbo property.George Grid A small portion of the northeast part of the historic George Grid lies within claim Carbo1; workincluded soil sampling, a magnetometer survey and geological mapping (Figures 8.1 8.6, 8.13).Minimal outcrop is reported from the grid area. Within claim Carbo1, soil samples were collected from lines spaced 100-m apart, at 50-mintervals. They are slightly anomalous in Niobium, with peak values of 319 ppm within claimCarbo1 and 883 ppm on the adjacent property (Figure 8.3); these results suggest the presence ofa buried alkaline intrusion(s). Cerium and Barium are locally enriched, and appear to partlycorrelate with Niobium (Figures 8.4 and 8.5); both constituents may be used to help locate theintrusive bodies. A peak value of 2,061 ppm Ce is reported within the claim Carbo1, and 25,905ppm Ce on the adjacent property. Samples with enrichment in Cerium, additionally showconsiderable enrichment in the other light REEs, La, Pr, Nd and Sm. Geological mapping outlined a narrow dioritic to granodioritic dyke in claim Carbo1, and onerock sample was analyzed showing a low concentration of 0.04% Nb (Figure 8.6). -5- 10. Sampling of the adjacent property on the George Grid revealed elevated REE concentration insoil and rock samples (Figure 8.6). Soil sample L72+00W 0+50S overlying the syenite outcropand trench GT-1 returned a value of 4.11% REE. The 1987 sampling of trench GT-2 on theGeorge Grid revealed a composite value of 1.11% REE over a width of 42 meters (samples10871-10878); and a high value of 1.36% REE over a width of five meters (sample 10873). Forthe 1987 sampling of the trenches on the George Grid (Lovang and Meyer, 1987), it should benoted that several elements reported were over their detection limits including La, Nd, and Ce.Also, only La, Ce, Nd, Sm, Eu, Tb, Dy and Lu values were reported. Magnetometer surveys indicate higher than background magnetic readings in the area of thesoil anomaly (Figure 8.7), which may be due to narrow and weakly magnetic dykes (Betmanis,1987).Prince Grid A majority of the 1986 exploration was conducted at the Prince Grid. This included soilsampling, trenching, rock sampling and a magnetometer survey (Betmanis, 1987). About half ofthe work was within the current claims Carbo2 and Carbo3, and the remainder was on an adjacentproperty (Figures 8.8 to 8.13). Within the Prince Grid, soil samples were collected from lines spaced 100-m apart, at 50-mintervals. They are strongly anomalous in Niobium, with peak values of 3,192 ppm within claimCarbo2, and 4,597 ppm on the adjacent property; these values correlate to mapped carbonatite inbedrock (Figure 8.8). Cerium and Barium are locally enriched (Figures 8.9; and 8.10), and appearto partly correlate with Niobium; both constituents may be used to help locate the intrusive bodies.A peak value of 2,017 ppm Ce is reported within claim Carbo2, and 914 ppm Ce on the adjacentproperty. Samples elevated in Cerium, additionally show considerable enrichment in the otherlight REEs La, Pr, Nd and Sm. Geological mapping in the Prince Grid outlined a carbonatite dyke at least 2 km long, with anorthwest strike (Figure 9.3). Eleven regional rock samples were collected from within claimCarbo2, and returned up to 0.19% Nb (Figure 8.11). Seven trenches were blasted and cleared on the Prince Grid for a total 79.5 m (Betmanis,1987). Among them trenches PT 5, PT6 and PT7 are within claim Carbo2 (Figure 8.11), thegreatest concentrations of Niobium and REE in rock samples at the Prince Grid were collectedfrom these trenches, with values up to approximately 0.95 %Nb2O5 (trench 6) and 0.43% REE(trench 5). -6- 11. A magnetic high of at least 100 gammas above background coincides with the carbonatite onthe Prince Grid (Figure 8.13). A distinct change in the background magnetic readings is apparentin the area of the mapped carbonatite outcrop. Northeast of the outcrop, values are between 400and 450 gammas, whereas gamma values are above 450 gammas to the southwest of theoutcrop. This is likely due differing host rock lithologies on either side of the carbonatite outcrop,with calcareous argillite mapped to the southwest and limestone to the northeast.D Grid A majority of the D Grid lies within the Carbo West Claim, on the west flank of Bear Ridge.(Figures 8.14 to 8.16). Within the D Grid, soil samples were collected from lines spaced 100-mapart, at 50-m intervals. They are weakly anomalous in Niobium, with a peak values of 136 ppmwithin claim Carbo West. Cerium and Barium show weakly elevated values above background.No rock sampling or other geological/geophysical work was conducted on D Grid.ITEM 9:GEOLOGIC SETTINGITEM 9A: REGIONAL GEOLOGY The property and adjacent area are underlain primarily by upper Cambrian and lowerOrdovician Kechika Group limestone, marble, slate siltstone, argillite and other calcareoussediments (Armstrong et al., 1969; and Massey et al., 2005). The strata strikes between 120 to 140 with steep dips to both the east and west. Severalfaults have been mapped, and are generally parallel to Wicheika Creek (040/50 NW). One faultin the area strikes northeastly and post-dates the northwestly faults (Figure 9.1).ITEM 9B: PROPERTY GEOLOGY During 1996, portions of the Carbo Property (Carbo2 and Carbo3) were mapped at a scale of1:5,000 by Teck Corporation (Betmanis, 1987). The Carbo 2 and 3 claims, partly underlie thehistoric Prince Grid (Betmanis, 1987; Figures 9.2 and 9.3), while a small portion of the GeorgeGrid overlaps with claim Carbo 1. The Prince Grid is underlain by interbedded limestone, calcareous argillite and phyllite. Thelithologies to the northeast consist primarily of massive white limestone interbedded with, lessmassive, and thinner bedded medium- to dark-grey limestone. Towards the southwest, the-7- 12. limestone units are more silty. Lithologies in the southwest part of the grid include interbedded,light-grey calcareous argillite and weakly calcareous phyllite, which are locally ferruginous. Several dike or sill-like alkaline intrusions were mapped by Teck Corporation (Betmanis, 1987;Figure 9.2 and 9.3). The main intrusion is sub parallel with the main bedding orientations of thehost lithologies, and was traced for about 2,700 m along strike. It varies in composition andthickness, along strike. The intrusions are carbonatitic or syentitic. The carbonatites vary from almost pure white toblack, and are locally pyroxenite-rich. Betmanis (1987) indicates the carbonatites are coarse- tomedium-grained, generally quartz free, and contain feldspar, carbonate, pyroxene and micas.Pyrite is a common accessory mineral. Fine-grained pyrochlore was identified by scanningelectron microprobe (Betmanis, 1987).Lithologies atop the main peak on the Prince Grid are distinctly different than the surroundingsediments, suggesting the presence of a west dipping thrust. Several other faults were identifiedby the displacement of the local stratigraphy, by drainage patterns, and by local depressions inthe topography. Faults are interpreted to be moderate to steep dipping.ITEM 10:DEPOSIT TYPEThe host rocks to the mineral occurrences on the Carbo Property are carbonatites, which aredefined as intrusive or extrusive igneous rocks composed of more than 50 percent, by volume,carbonate minerals.They typically occur within zoned alkalic complexes with otherunder-saturated alkaline rocks (feldspathoidal syenites and rocks of the ijolite suite), and can formintrusive plugs, dykes or sills.Carbonatites are relatively enriched in alkali elements, with classification based on thepresence of calcite, dolomite, ferrorcarbonate minerals, and natrocarbonate minerals (Wolley andKempe, 1989). A majority of carbonatites are located within stable, intra-plate areas; however,some are spatially related to plate margins. Carbonatites tend to occur in groups or provinces.Over 527 examples are known (Woolley and Kjarsgaard, 2008).Carbonatite-related deposits are classified as magmatic or metasomatic types (Richardsonand Birkett, 1996), and their supergene equivalents (Mariano, 1989). Deposits of niobium and/ortantalum within carbonatites are generally formed by primary magmatic concentration. Accordingto Mariano (1989), carbonatites associated REE deposits occur as follows:(a) primary, from carbonatite melts (ex. Mountain Pass, USA),-8- 13. (b) hydrothermal (ex. Bayan Obo, China), and (c) supergene, developed in carbonatite-derived laterites (Araxa and Catalao I Brazil; Mt.Weld, Australia).Carbonatites contain the greatest contents of REEs and highest LREE:HREE ratios of anyigneous rocks (Cullers and Graf, 1984). Additional examples of carbonatite-associated deposits include: Cargill, Ontario (phosphate);Niobec and Oka, Quebec (niobium); Mountain Pass, California (REE, barium); Araxa andCatalao, Brazil (niobium, phosphate, REE); and Palabora, South Africa (copper, phosphate,REE).ITEM 11:MINERALIZATION Mineralization within the Carbo Property is hosted by carbonatite and related alkalineintrusions. Betmanis,1987 noted that the better grades of Niobium and REE are from sections ofweathered intrusive rock with black gouge or whitish clay on fractures.This indicates thepossibility of remobilization of elements during structural events after emplacement of thecarbonatite intrusions. Rock samples collected from the historic open pits and trenches during 2006 returned amaximum value of 3258 ppm Nb (sample 24455; Figure 12.4). A sample from a nearby outcropreturned a maximum value of 4673 ppm REEs (sample 24018; Figure 12.5). Several alkaline intrusions with high gamma (CPS) readings were identified within claimsCarbo1, Carbo2 and Carbo West, where surface outcrops from the areas returned values to 1526ppm Nb (Sample 24459; Figure 12.4).ITEM 12: EXPLORATION After acquiring Carbo1, Carbo2 and Carbo3 claims in 2005, personnel of DahrougeGeological Consulting Ltd. on behalf Commerce Resources Corp., conducted an explorationprogram during the summers of 2006 and 2007 (Guo and Dahrouge, 2006; Guo, 2007). The workprograms included a soil geochemical survey, rock sampling, ground scintillometer andmagnetometer geophysical surveys and prospecting. Table 2 summarizes the expenditures peryear between 2006 and 2009. Most of the work was within the Carbo2 and Carbo3 claims. ClaimCarboWest was staked after the 2006 exploration, and prior to the 2007 exploration.-9- 14. Table 2: Expenditures between 2006 and 2009 Year200620072009Expenditures$74,973.61 $31,554.77 $ 9,559.20Total $116,087.58Soil Sampling In total, 345 soil samples were collected during 2006 and 2007 (291 in 2006 and 54 in 2007(Figures 12.1 to 12.3). Soil geochemistry maps (Figures 12.1 to 12.3) were prepared for Nb, Ce,and Ba. The historic work indicates that anomalous Niobium in soils correspond to the location ofthe underlying carbonatite, which suggests there was little lateral dispersion in soils (Betmanis,A.I,1987). Cerium shows a weak correlation with Niobium (Figure 12.1 and 12.2), with severalspot highs exceeding 400 ppm Ce. During 2006 a soil sample collected from claim Carbo2, returned highly anomalousconcentrations of Au (sample 24204: 1,739.9 ppb; Figure 12.8). Follow-up exploration during2007, around this location included a grid with 25 soil samples collected every 12.5 m; in addition,six rock samples were collected and analyzed for Au. One soil sample was also collected fromthe same location as the 2006 sample. Both sets of samples were analyzed with Acme AnalyticalAnalysis: Group 1DX (0.50 gram sample leached with 3 ml 2-2-2 HCL-HNO3-H2O at 95 DEG. Cfor one hour, diluted to 10 ml, analysed by ICP-MS. The follow-up soil and rock sampling revealedonly background gold values in and around the area of the 2006, sample 24204.Rock Samples A total of 56 rock samples were collected from intrusive outcrops and float during 2006 and2007 (Figures 12.4 and 12.5). Forty-five of the samples are carbonatitic and other alkalineintrusive rocks, with high REE and Niobium concentrations.Niobium contents range frombackground to1525.6 ppm Nb, and average 537 ppm (Figure 12.4). Total REE values range from72.79 to 4672.57 ppm, and average 1330.84 ppm (Figure 12.5). Soil sampling near grid coordinate 3600E / 200N reveals a consistent enrichment in Niobium,Cerium and Barium values (Figures 12.1 to 12.3); as well as, being a large radioactive anomaly(Figure 12.7). Rock sample 28508 measured 1800 CPS, and returned 247.4 ppm Thorium, 810.6- 10 - 15. ppm Niobium and 1022.19 ppm REEs from a limonite-stained phyllite outcrop. Sample 28531 from Carbo1 was relatively enrichment in Pb and Zn, with 3,027 ppm and 2,377ppm, respectively. It also contained 31,025 ppm Barium.Geophysical Surveys Magnetic high anomalies do not appear to closely correlate with the radioactivity of the groundor the content of Niobium, Cerium or Barium in soil samples (Figure 12.6). One sample (24169),revealed 281.4 ppm Nb, 224.3 ppm Ce and 1125.4 ppm Ba (Figures 12.1 to 12.3) in an area ofelevated magnetic readings, indicating the possibility for a buried carbonatite outcrop. Rocksampling was not conducted in this area. There appears to be a variation in background magnetic readings on either side of the largemagnetic anomaly trending NW-SE, similar to the trend occurring on the historic Prince Grid(Section 8B); with higher magnetics to the southwest, and lower to the northeast. The magnetichigh (greater than 56,128 gammas) appears to be on-trend with the historically mappedcarbonatite outcrop and historic magnetic anomaly on the Prince Grid (Figure 8.13), furtherindicating the possibility for buried carbonatite. Moderate to strong radioactivity is noted within the southern portion of the Carbo1 and Carbo2claims during the 2006 and 2007 scintillometer survey (Figure 12.7). The backgroundradioactivity of the grid area is approximately 50-200 CPS. A NW-SE trending radioactiveanomaly is apparent in the central part of the survey area. The anomalous trend likely outlines thelocation of the syenite that was sampled; returning elevated REE (up to 1573 ppm, sample 24001)and moderate Niobium concentrations (up to 843 ppm, sample 24003) (Figures 12.4 and 12.5). Radioactive readings were also taken during rock sampling. Elevated radioactivity appears tobe caused by elevated Thorium concentrations. A moderate relationship between radioactivity(Thorium content) and Niobium/REE concentrations is indicated. For example, the rock sample 28505 measured 8200 CPS, and returned 1522.5 ppmThorium, 731.6 ppm Niobium and 1030.64 ppm REEs from a syenite outcrop. Other rocksamples that measured above 1000 CPS returned above average values of Thorium andNiobium; and near average REE values.ITEM 13: DRILLING- 11 - 16. There is no known drilling within the property.ITEM 14:SAMPLING METHOD AND APPROACH Information regarding sampling methods and approach employed by Dahrouge during theexploration of the Carbo Property is included in prior mineral claim Assessment Reports (Guo andDahrouge, 2007; Guo, 2007), filed with the B.C. Ministry of Energy, Mines & PetroleumResources. These descriptions have been supplemented by the authors first hand knowledge ofthe exploration activities conducted during 2006-2007. The 2006 and 2007 exploration programswere under the direct supervision of the author. During 2006 and 2007, a total of 56 rock samplesand 345 soil samples were collected from the property. In addition, approximately 20 line-kms ofground scintillometer and magnetometer geophysical surveys were completed. The explorationwas conducted throughout Carbo Property, with a majority of work completed within the Carbo2,Carbo3 and Carbo West claims.Rock Samples Rock sample locations and type are listed in Appendix 1, and shown on Figures 12.4 and12.5. All the rock samples are grab samples, and may not accurately represent the grade ofmineralization at the given location. Trenching accompanied by channel sampling, compositechip sampling, and/or diamond drilling will be required to obtain an estimate of the representativegrade for the carbonatite complex. Rock sample UTM locations were recorded using Garmin 76GPS, with an accuracy of approximately 5-10m. Due to the density of the forest cover within thework area, the accuracy of some locations is poor. The coordinate system used is NAD 1983,UTM Zone10.Soil Sampling Soil sampling was carried out across parts of the Carbo Property during 2006 and 2007(Figures 12.1 to 12.3). Sample locations and type are listed in Appendix 2. The objective of thiswork was to delineate possible near surface occurrences of carbonatite or alkaline rocks, usingcharacteristic geochemical tracers (Nb, REEs and Ba), in order to aid in locating possible sites forfollow-up hand trenching and prospecting. Soil surveys previously employed by CommerceResources Corp. have proved to be an efficient technique in locating carbonatites withinmountainous terrains of British Columbia. - 12 - 17. The soil survey on the Carbo Property was carried out over an area measuring approximately1500 by 2500 meters, covering approximately 3.75 sq. km. (Figures 12.1 to 12.3). Samples werecollected from 50 meter stations on grid-lines spaced 150 m apart. The survey was planned inadvance, and the coordinates of each station were calculated and imported to Garmin 76 GPS.The locations were navigated to with the GPS and flagged in the field.Soil samples were taken from a presumed B-horizon between 0.1 m -1.0 m below surface,depending on vegetation and thickness of overburden (which varied across the sampled areas).Most samples were collected from 0.2 to 0.5 m below surface. Alluvial beds were avoidedwherever possible. Any visible rock fragments larger than 1-2 cm, including both glacial andcolluvial material; as well as, organics were hand-removed. Sample depth, colour, particle size,wetness, amount of rock fragments and their lithology, and the amount and characteristics oforganics were recorded.Whenever a gravel-rich, impenetrable layer was reached using ashovel, it was assumed to be immediately above the bedrock, and the sample was taken from thatlayer. The soil samples weighed between 0.5 - 1.5 kg, and were packed in pre-labelled plasticbags with the detached paper tag from a sample book together with a piece of a flagging tapemarked with the sample number using a felt marker, and were tie-locked. The samples wereshipped to Acme Analytical Laboratories Ltd. in Vancouver, where the pulps and rejects arestored.Geophysical SurveysScintllometer and magnetometer surveys were completed at 12.5 meter stations on the 150 minterval grid lines (Figures 12.6 and 12.7). The surveys used the same grid locations establishedfor the soil lithogeochemical program. Magnetic and radiometric surveys in combination with soilsampling by Commerce Resources Corp. in the Blue River area have proved to be an efficienttechnique in locating buried carbonatite rocks (Gorham, 2007).A GR-110G/E portable gamma-ray scintillometer with a 4.5 cubic inch sodium-iodide detectorwas used for both the 2006 and 2007 surveys. The gamma-ray scintillometer was certified byExploranium G.S. Ltd.The GR-110G scintillometer measures total intensity of gamma-rayemissions from the following three naturally occurring radionuclides: 40K (1.46 MeV); 214Bi (0.609238 208 2.44 MeV) a product ofU-series decay; and Tl (0.277 2.62 MeV) a product of232Th-series decay. The scintillometers operating minimum energy threshold is 45 KeV, with themaximum count rate of 9,999 counts per second (cps). The battery voltage and the count ratefrom a provided sample of 137Cs radionuclide were routinely checked before each survey session - 13 - 18. to ensure that the instrument operates within the specified parameters. In addition, the localbackground count rate level was measured at ~1 m above the ground before each surveysession. The specified background level varies from 40 to 100 cps, but is up to 200 cps due tometasediments or alkaline rocks composed of potassium-bearing minerals such as micas andfeldspar (sources of the gamma radiation from 40K). During the survey sessions, the scintillometer was always kept in its leather case to reduce therisk of an accidental mechanical shock and to minimize the detectors surface contamination. Allmeasurements were carried out at 1 sec count rate, recording an approximate average of 20 60readings (in cps) integrated during a 20 60 sec counting interval, respectively, for eachmeasurement. The detector was put on the ground at all times during measurements. The ground radiometric survey is a potentially useful supplement to the soil litho-geochemicalsurvey as the carbonatites and alkaline rocks contain concentrations of Thorium within apatitie,pyrochlore, or some rare earth minerals. These minerals are relatively resistant and accumulatein the soil, thus causing elevated radiation above the background. A GSM-19 Overhauser Magnetometer was used for the 2006 magnetic survey.Themeasurements of the magnetic field (in nT) were taken at 12.5 m intervals following the soillithogeochemical / radiometric survey grid. The magnetometers internal clocks weresynchronized before beginning of the survey session. One of the instruments operated in thebase mode in a magnetically quiet place away from power lines, roads and any metalconstructions, while another was used for surveying the grid in a semi-automated,pre-programmed mode. All measured signals were of excellent quality. The diurnal correctionswere made automatically at the end of the survey session. The survey was designed to supplement the soil lithogeochemical and radiometric surveys, inview of the common, to locally abundant, magnetite or pyrrhotite commonly found in carbonatites.Presence of the magnetic minerals in the carbonatites renders magnetic survey a potentially veryefficient exploration technique.ITEM 15: SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY Personnel of Dahrouge collected all the samples during 2006 and 2007 from the property. Atthe time of sample collection, the samples were bagged, tagged and recorded. All the sampleswere reordered and checked at the end of day and then stored in sealed 5 gallon plastic pale.Sample chain of custody was maintained by personnel of Dahrouge. The samples were stored at- 14 - 19. the site until the crew demobilization. The samples were brought back to the Dahrouge GeologicalConsulting Ltd. office in Edmonton, Alberta with the field crews, and then shipped to ACMEAnalytical Laboratories Ltd in Vancouver via courier for analysis. There was no indication fromthe lab that the samples were tampered with. The sampling was under the direct supervision ofthe author. It is the opinion of the author that sample preparation, security, and analytical proceduresemployed during the 2006 and 2007 exploration programs conform to industry standards. Thisopinion is based upon the authors first hand knowledge of the exploration techniques andprotocols employed, as a result of his participation in the exploration. As a consequence of this,the author has not specifically verified any of the sampling data, taken any samples that were notpart of the exploration program, or conducted a specific follow-up site visit. At Acme Analytical laboratories Ltd., rock samples were crushed using ACME R150preparation procedure: crushing the rock to -10 mesh (>70) and then pulverized a 250 g split to>90% -150 mesh. Soil samples were pulverized to -100 mesh ASTM in a mild-still pulverizer. Allrock and soil samples were analyzed using their Group 4B (Full Suite) and Group 4A (intrusiverocks only): rare earth and refractory elements are determined by ICP mass spectrometerfollowing a lithium metraborate/tetraborate fusion and nitric acid digestion of a 0.2 g sample. Inaddition, a separate 0.5 g split is digested in aqua regia and analysed by ICP-Mass spectrometerto obtain precious and base metals values (Appendix 3). Group 4A: 0.2 g sample were analysedby ICP-emission spectrometry following a lithium metraborate/ tetraborate fusion and dilute nitricdigestion. Repeat analyses for random samples was completed, as was the periodic analyses ofa standard. Given the stages of the exploration at the Carbo Property, quality control procedures such asduplicate samples, sample blanks and standards were not conducted. The author is of theopinion that the sample preparation, security and analytical procedure were adequate for theearly stage of the exploration at Carbo Property.ITEM 16: DATA VERIFICATION ACME Analytical Laboratories Ltd. completed routine QA/QC through the sample preparationand analysis procedure, which includes internal duplicates and standards (Appendix 3). Noexternal duplicates, blanks and standards were inserted to the sample suite prior to analysis. The author verified the 2006 and 2007 results obtained by the lab and compared them to the - 15 - 20. historic analysis. The author is of opinion that the exploration conducted by Teck ExplorationsLimited in 1986 and 1987 is of a high quality.ITEM 17:ADJACENT PROPERTIES Some information obtained in Section 8: History, of this report includes the review ofexploration results from the adjacent historic claims, such as George and Lake claims. Thesehistoric claims are located to the north and south of the current Carbo Property and are currentlycovered by claims owned by Spectrum Mining Corp. (Figure 8.2). All of the maps in Section 8:History of this report clearly define the property boundary of the current Carbo claim. The authorhas not verified the results reported in these adjacent claims, and the information reported onthese claims is not necessarily indicative of the mineralization on the Carbo property. All of the information included in Section 12; Exploration, of this report is on the current CarboProperty.ITEM 18:MINERAL PROCESSING AND MEALLURGICAL TESTINGThis section is not applicable to the subject property.ITEM 19:MINERAL RESOURCES AND MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATESThis section is not applicable to the subject property.ITEM 20: OTHER RELEVENT DATA AND INFORMATION There appear to be no environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-economic, orpolitical issues that adversely affect the potential development of the property. The exploration at the Carbo Property to date has shown that the Carbonatite System locallycontains anomalous values of thorium as an accessory element. Analytical results of rock andsoil samples from the 2006 and 2007 exploration indicate considerable variation in thoriumconcentrations. The exploration conducted during 2006 and 2007 has monitored the levels of these elementsin the various samples collected, both as an exploration tool and for environmental assessmentpurposes. Analyses indicate that both elements are present in low amounts in the mineralized - 16 - 21. areas; other than a single sample, all of the 2006 and 2007 rock sampling results were below the0.05% uranium and 0.15% thorium reporting thresholds as defined in the Mineral ExplorationCode: Part 11.13" 24 of the Health, Safety and Reclamation Code for Mines in British Columbia,May 1998". One sample contained the threshold value of 0.15% thorium, whereas the averagevalue within most carbonatite samples was between 0.005% and 0.05% thorium. It is importantthat Commerce continue monitoring thorium levels in subsequent programs.ITEM 21:INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS Historic work located a carbonatite complex and related alkaline intrusive rocks that extend forseveral kilometres along Bear Ridge, and which are partly within the Carbo Property. Theintrusive rocks are highly anomalous in Niobium and REEs. The Niobium-bearing mineral,pyrochlore, is generally 250 CPS.0 Niobium Soil Geochemistry Magnetic Anomaly 0250500 EMeters50< 56,128 gammas40 E> 56,128 gammasNM1:15,0002009.0300 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 1042 49. 558500 559000 559500 560000 560500 561000 561500 Wicheedda Lake515430 63 11.1CARBO14 .315 6.99 87 116 11 .6 . 7 0102.82 2 12 . 8 11 .5 203.415 2.38. 3. 55155 219.123 13 2. 11 .9 15 . 4 360425002 411 .84.129712 8 .2 4W137 31 10 12 . 496 8 11 .2 63 8. 213 . 4 3. ich15 . 64. 4. 5.18 6.94 9 86 814 6 12 1 612793 4 . cik 11 .2 6. 3 12 . 410 . 4 0 99 12 . 7 2. .61533. E10 . 911aC412520 10 8 0 13 . 7508 0 87813 . 828 . 8 2 14 2.610 . 992 .1169.17 . 3 18 . 3 09 510re 9. 47 9. 6 41482. 12 10 . 14.1512612 . 610. 9.97 7ek311 .5981 9. 8 5 13 113 . 5 2 311 .91 14 . 5 021 4620 6. 4 7.5 13 . 5 0.10 95 2. 15 5 14 . 872 74 11 .6514 . 1 8 1. 15 296 312 . 9 .5 0.1633.10 . 2.64105 91651. 8411 .3 56 0. 416 . 9811 .78 1 13 . 412 . 6 691 6 89 9 .17 . 3 81. 97. 12 2822 0. 52 5.11 . 101 8. 4.18 . 18.84 3.36042000 5. 99 26 13 6. 1112 9718813.3 4 925 751 11 .8 .2 811 .617 . 7 91218 . 3 13 18 3 916 . 8 1.4 70 12.1 12 . 3 4 10 . 112 2. 8 515 11 .211 .8 9 11 .812 . 1 1 9. 1812 . 8207 0. 1. 11 .17.4 49 9. 988193. 7 3. 2.1337 800.3 15 . 97 7. 16 . 3 3. 13 2 116810 . 19 12 0. 9 12 2210.317.210 5.11 874. 7 4.3. 10 . 3 15 . 10 8316 9. 313 812 61.91 15 6 1088 12.1 0 57 410 .224 5. 3 13 . 84. 9.11 510 . 513 96 2 5 813 . 2.1. 6.16 . 712 . 5 384 8.310 . 311 1.518 7 157 9.51.9 .394.2 4 812 9 14 09 93 99 111 .713 53 93 1011 .611 .520 8. 16. .7 13 .14 .4 0. 5536347 6.111 .311 .3 21 94 87 4 10 9.86.92 3 10 01 15 3.94.7. 19 46.9313 111.733 9. 9. 312 44.CARBO WEST10 .310 . 8 44115 7 012 . 7 13 . 1 55 7.191 10 24 11 .93 8 10 . 2 1. 3 3 56 61. 1 20 10 . 22.1012 . 712 . 52 0. 5 1016 . 612 . 7 08. 98 4 90 312 . 3 36. 11 712 85.7 12499 2 671 911 .1 26041500 10 .2 612 . 11 15 . 28.11 .613 . 1 1. 16 . 5. 4. 132 1.5788.8 1518. 367 911191. 4 51543211 11 .8 .0. 1.11 .9 10 . 7 0 858 8 16 28 13 . 2 9 3 93 8 2.57.7. 14 3. 2. 5.CARBO2 .15 1 6. 7 82 4 63618 2.910 28.3 26. 13 . 5 21 . 21 86 115 . 3 4..173 5. 3 12 . 412 93 99 5.18610.520 98 5 Soil Geochemistry4864 8 10.719 . 0.0 11 .3 11 94.4 E 110.4300 Ce (ppm) 10 . 5 10 . 2 9. 1 4. 1169.7. 310 05. 5 2.27 1 11510 912 270 186 4 14 . 1 E 55.1 - 100.0 9.5. .20 9. 785 650 8 2 990907. 15 . 2.1E2815.0.4. 100.0 - 200.090 3 14 9 8 500.1 10 5. 4E 8.1 2. 16041000117 10 85 00 49 944 200.0 - 400.0.10 . 8 5 10 . 8 55 0 1. 30 4.3 8.4E. 9 83 1 11 50 1Wichcika C 400.0 - 817.5 .510 . 4 31 3.0E97 00 Grid2006. 98 5 0N 3386 .7(bCANADIAN INTERNATIONAL E Carbonatite, Syenite.8 as50 11 0. e liMINERALS INC.34 Current Carbo Property 7ne 93 E17 .1 )00reek1. Radioactive Anomaly20 436 0.1 < 250 CPS14 Figure 12.2 2006-2007 Sampling6040500 3. > 250 CPS7Cerium Soil Geochemistry Magnetic Anomaly0 250 500E Meters 50 < 56,128 gammas 40E > 56,128 gammas NM1:15,000 2009.03 00Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 10 42 50. 558500 559000559500560000 560500561000 561500 Wicheedda Lake515430 34 1.CARBO1 57 62.63 8 897. 2843 1832.6.9.25 1 73 41 7 3 .52. 662. 47 97. 27547 8563680 12 11.8. 1 7. 305510 . 26 .8 57 2050 604250012 03. 8475 6 11 5.5 9596 8 54 . 9W.958 126 52 . 8 74 . 62. ich67 .838 6535 11 1 47 049. 85 59 . 3566 83 58 852 . 5 cik11 2 14 06. 60 . 7 0 18 . 7 09 7835. 110 1. 52 . 9 40 . 819 E 80 .231 31140 . 766 . 57aC519 60 . 798 . 850 9 89 . 6 747 . 539 . 3 13 77 .7 60 . 3 754 . 51611 7.5 89 . 711 3.315re9 6 061 . 22317 . 960 . 78 49 . 7 13 38 . 57 . 611 9 .7687ek873 . 9 216 29 .97 . 4 8 53 . 6 0814 6. 583 2. 7 4.75 . 6 1. 58 . 9 7524 3 546 4.59 2 9 22 57.68 . 9 70 . 6 .98 9957 . 1 6 4 6 10 1 12 . 7 9 13 18.71 . 792 13 3. 211 .5 75 . 7 342 2 10 4. 568 . 4 53136 990 71 63 7511 .4 5953 9.7 623 7 11 .4998 . 7 67 . 857 . 992 . 8 11 7. 17 10 .3 360 . 2 80 75925 1 972 . 10758 . 5354 . 5 6042000 11 3.572.5 77 . 443.418 3. 3 4 79 37945. 8810 0 .171614 . 2 417 96 . 51156 . 486461 . 9 87 . 211 5.3669 . 3 49 . 322358 . 9960 . 9 61 . 463 . 1 7. 94 78 . 5734. 9 89 83 4. 9 784. 90. 777 855738 12 1 39 .510 7.7 53 50.73 . 6 627 . 4 54 . 70172 8 80 . 4 75 . 40 73 5 47 . 82. 68 . 4 87 . 9290 8. 53.0. 7 9.14 50.6 5 40 . 8 77 . 493. 3. 87 . 3 848. 8 7.64 6 53 69 9. 9.608 77 7 4.0824 7.1 324 265 1 46 674 . 3 17 82.729 7. 2877 . 4 61 . 950 . 4 679 . 610 81. 4 6 53 2.1 511. 511 6. 1336970 70 10 98 9. 15 7790 . 8 844. 57. 01 8 .817 465185 4. 2 4 5. 4 10 0. 7 70 . 4492 . 7 456 975 .7 13 3. 73 17 0. 266 . 3 865 . 6 3.5363477 3115 67.21 77 . 3182 . 7359 369 . 149 3.9.7 78 50 10 3.1 5.6 75 . 78. 77.222 . 47 0. 8 79 4 CARBO WEST 73 . 9 1.84 76 . 5 86 . 74983 05 19 601 75. 3777 . 46959 . 3 53 8.19 4 44 523 7.8 0. 86 4. 210 4. 2 62 9 10 5.63 . 10 0 66 755 . 4 3 .199 2. 657 9 03 9133 9 15 10.60 . 2 0 69 . 5 11 1.3 83 82 60 . 5 56 . 5 5 373 . 6.6 6041500 58 . 564 . 674.9.75 . 973 . 6 7 7. 198.515 519 2. 86 3 11.8 84 694872. 7.748 0.8.93 563 5154327. 57641. 664 397 6181 9 .5 9 261 . 9 7. 99 57 . 7 86 1. 41 642 . 7CARBO23.118.3.79 . 695 35 .9 7 9 8 8. 586 6686 979 . 710 8. 3 3 5 7912 . 2 55 . 30 14 13.72 6 52 3 9 49109 13 1. 71. 3 81 . 2Soil Geochemistry 8658 9 67 . 690 .5 00 .616 6. 310 1. 2 54.39E 73 14 63 . 2 734Ba (ppm) 50 . 3 0085 . 3 78 . 00 10 80 77 . 771 59. . 33. 27 96.3.858341.6 - 800.0 49 . 3 607 602 145. 3 4 E8 451 . 156 . 56 426 80. 150 60 . 3 55 . 970 925 75 . 1E28800.0 - 1200.071 . 5 62 . 0 4. 10 . 647 2 50994 0. 3E 95. 7044 . 9 67 . 9 6041000 00 491200.0 - 2000.01 67 . 9443 . 075 87 . 1 69 . 68. 300. 0. 9 1. 3 E 321 58 7502000.0 - 4737.8Wichcika C2.9 066 . 9319. 699EGrid20066 00 86 . 8 0N 33 8Carbonatite, Syenite 99 . 5 (bCANADIAN INTERNATIONAL E 3 69 . 0as50Current Carbo Property 86 . 1 8e li MINERALS INC.34 5. neE 61 1 ) 00Radioactive Anomalyreek 3.551 36 6.< 250 CPS 071Figure 12.3 2006-2007 Sampling 6040500> 250 CPS 1. 9 Barium Soil GeochemistryMagnetic Anomaly 0 250 500 E < 56,128 gammas50 Meters40 > 56,128 gammas E NM1:15,0002009.0300 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 1042 51. 559000 559500560000560500 561000 561500 Wicheedda Lake 28513 - 18 ppm28515 - 20 ppm 28460 - 18 ppm 28526 - 23 ppm Wich28519 - 25 ppmcik aC28511 - 20 ppm1:8,000 re24010 - 617 ppm 24005 - 538 ppm ek 6042000 E0027515430 CARBO10NE 50 28 28508 - 811 ppmE 0028507 - 819 ppm28505 - 732 ppm 30 6041500 E 28506 - 48 ppm00 E33503124004 - 7 ppm515432CARBO224451 - 690 ppm24462 - 53 ppm24024 - 3 ppm24463 - 69 ppm24025 - 26 ppm24015 - 2822 ppm 24023 - 36 ppm24016 - 1017 ppm 24011 - 880 ppm 24017 - 870 ppm 24012 - 732 ppm 24461 - 806 ppm 24018 - 732 ppm 24013 - 134 ppm 24014 - 455 ppm 24019 - 760 ppmPT-5 24020 - 708 ppm28532 - 87 ppm28531 - 532 ppm 24452 - 912 ppmPT-7 24021 - 547 ppm 24006 - 578 ppm 24453 - 477 ppm PT-6 24022 - 394 ppm 28530 - 605 ppm24454 - 693 ppm 24001 - 378 ppm28529 - 580 ppm24464 - 579 ppm 24455 - 3258 ppm 24002 - 562 ppm24465 - 1150 ppm 24456 - 90 ppm 24003 - 843 ppm 604100028534 - 19 ppm24457 - 481 ppm28528 - 590 ppm 24007 - 535 ppm 24458 - 623 ppm53634724008 - 257 ppmCARBO WEST 24009 - 545 ppmE 50Rock Samples (2006-2007) Current Carbo Property 24460 - 776 ppm 34Nb (ppm) Carbonatite, Syenite CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL E00< 250Grid2006 MINERALS INC.36 24459 - 1526 ppm251 - 500Radioactive Anomaly E E501 - 1000 < 250 CPS505049Figure 12.4 2006-2007 Sampling401001 - 1500> 250 CPSNiobium Rock Geochemistry1501 - 3258Magnetic AnomalyTrench < 56,128 gammas 0 250 500E 00 MetersNM 1:8,0002009.03 6040500 42 > 56,128 gammas Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 10 52. 559000 559500560000 560500561000561500Wicheedda Lake28513 - 218 ppm28515 - 226 ppm28460 - 268 ppm 28526 - 250 ppmW ich28519 - 289 ppm cikaC28511 - 187 ppm1:8,000re 24010 - 783 ppm 24005 - 648 ppmek6042000 E0027 515430CARBO10NE 50 28 28508 - 1022 ppmE 00 28507 - 665 ppm28505 - 1031 ppm 306041500E28506 - 329 ppm 00 E 33503124004 - 73 ppm515432 CARBO2 24451 - 3166 ppm 24462 - 229 ppm 24024 - 111 ppm24463 - 1406 ppm 24025 - 1088 ppm 24015 - 849 ppm 24023 - 383 ppm 24016 - 2652 ppm 24011 - 2698 ppm24017 - 3236 ppm 24012 - 2974 ppm24461 - 818 ppm 24018 - 4673 ppm 24013 - 831 ppm 24014 - 1315 ppm24019 - 4654 ppmPT-5 24020 - 3503 ppm 28532 - 214 ppm 28531 - 1000 ppm 24452 - 3307 ppm PT-724021 - 2704 ppm24006 - 830 ppm24453 - 2599 ppm PT-624022 - 675 ppm 28530 - 651 ppm 24454 - 301 ppm 24001 - 1573 ppm28529 - 1391 ppm 24464 - 1397 ppm 24455 - 681 ppm 24002 - 570 ppm24465 - 2298 ppm24456 - 2450 ppm24003 - 1127 ppm6041000 28534 - 142 ppm 24457 - 829 ppm24007 - 1464 ppm24458 - 2597 ppm53634728528 - 1560 ppm 24008 - 530 ppmCARBO WEST 24009 - 1558 ppmE 50Rock Samples (2006-2007) Current Carbo Property24460 - 1067 ppm 34total REE (ppm)Carbonatite, Syenite CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL E00< 500Grid2006 MINERALS INC.3624459 - 438 ppm501 - 1000Radioactive Anomaly EE1001 - 1500< 250 CPS50 5049 Figure 12.5 2006-2007 Sampling 401501 - 3000> 250 CPS REE Rock Geochemistry3001 - 4673 Magnetic AnomalyTrench < 56,128 gammas 0 250 500 E00 MetersNM 1:8,000 2009.03604050042 > 56,128 gammas Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 10 53. 558500 559000559500560000 560500561000561500 Wicheedda Lake515430CARBO1 6042500W ich cik EaC5016reek 6042000536347CARBO WEST 6041500515432 CARBO2 Survey Data Points E00 Current Carbo Property27E 50 Grid2006 E 2850 Carbonatite, Syenite and Related Rocks E 60410000049302006 Magnetometer GridE 50 Wichcika CValue (nT) 31 E High : 56524.400 0N33(bCANADIAN INTERNATIONALEas 50 Low : 55457.2 e linMINERALS INC. 34 e) E00Historic Prince Grid reek36(Gammas) Figure 12.6 2006-2007 Work, 6040500 < 480 480 - 525 Magnetometer Survey E 525 - 1000500 25050040 MetersE 1:15,000 00Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 10 NM 2009.03 42 54. 558500 559000559500560000 560500561000561500 Wicheedda Lake515430CARBO1 6042500W ich cik EaC5016reek 6042000536347CARBO WEST 6041500515432 CARBO2 E0027E 50 E 2850 E 6041000004930E 50 Wichcika C Grid2006 31 E Survey Data Point00 0N33 Current Carbo Property (bCANADIAN INTERNATIONALEas 50 Carbonatite, Syenite and Related Rockse linMINERALS INC. 34 e) E00Scintillometer Grid reek36Value (CPS) Figure 12.7 2006-2007 Work, 6040500 High : 1079.23 Scintillometer Survey E Low : 40.458500 25050040 MetersENM 1:15,0002009.03 00Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 10 42 55. 5600001.5Wicheedda Lake0. 5W0. 5 ich cikaCreek 1.46. 35. 2 1.2 28515 - 0.5 ppb 0.50.5 28513 - 0.5 ppb 10.2 1.0.540.50.5 1739 0.5 1.2 0.5 .90.50.5 0.5 28460 - 1.3 ppb 0.90.50. 0.90.528526 - 0.5 ppb5 0.50.5 0.70.5 0.5 0. 0.528519 - 0.8 ppb59.2 0.50. 70.8 28511 - 0.5 ppb 0.7 0.8Soil Geochemistry 1. 5Au (ppb) 0.5CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL< 5.0 MINERALS INC.5.0 - 25.025.0 - 100.01. 5100.0 - 1739.90. Figure 12.8 2006-2007 Sampling 7 Gold anomaly and verificationRock Samples (sample number - Au ppm) 050100Grid2006MetersCurrent Carbo Property 0.6Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 10NM1:2,000 2009.03 56. APPENDIX 1LOCATION OF ROCK SAMPLES 57. Appendix 1 Locations of the 2006-2007 Soil Samples Outcrop/Sample Number Station YearUTM83_E UTM83_NRock_TypeFloat Description 24001MG01 2006 5601416041019 Carbonatite F 24002MG02 2006 5601416041019 Carbonatite F 24003MG03 2006 5601416041019 Sandstone Fwith py 24004MG02 2006 5601276041439 MarbleOAlterated 24005MG03 2006 5594426042064 Sandstone Fwith py 24006MG04 2006 5602736041142 hauine phonoliteOwith py 24007MG01 2006 5601416041019 Syenite O 24008MG01 2006 5601416041019 Marble(?) O Contact with Syenite 24009MG01 2006 5601416041019 Syenite O Close to country rock 24010 2006 5594726042075 Aphanitic rockOwith py 24011MG05 2006 5612486041271 Carbonatite Owith py 24012MG05 2006 5612486041271 Carbonatite Owith py 24013MG05 2006 5612486041271 Carbonatite O 24014MG05 2006 5612486041271 Carbonatite O 24015MG05 2006 5612486041271 PyroxeniteO 24016MG05 2006 5612486041271 Carbonatite Owith py 24017MG05 2006 5612486041271 Carbonatite O 24018MG05 2006 5612486041271 Carbonatite O 24019MG05 2006 5612486041271 Carbonatite O 24020MG05 2006 5612486041271 Carbonatite O 24021MG05 2006 5612486041271 Carbonatite O 24022MG05 2006 5612486041271 Carbonatite O 24023MG06 2006 5612616041308 Carbonatite O 24024MG07 2006 5612126041324 Carbonatite O 24025MG07 2006 5612126041324 Carbonatite O 24451MG07 2006 5612126041324 Carbonatite O 24452MG08 2006 5611956041231 Carbonatite O 24453MG08 2006 5611956041231 Carbonatite O 24454Trench 2006 5612286041140 Carbonatite O 24455Trench 2006 5612286041140 Carbonatite O 24456Trench 2006 5612286041140 Carbonatite O 24457Trench 2006 5612286041140 Carbonatite O 24458Trench 2006 5612286041140 Carbonatite O 24459MG16 2006 5597756040723 PyroxeniteO 24460MG17 2006 5599086040849 O 24461MG18 2006 5601506041247 Nephelinite(?)O 24462MG07 2006 5612126041324 PyroxeniteO 24463MG07 2006 5612126041324 Carbonatite O 24464Trench 2006 5612286041140 Carbonatite Owith py 24465Trench 2006 5612286041140 Carbonatite OWith Sulfides 28505 2007 5603966041553 Synite(?) O 28506 2007 5603966041553 PhylliteO 28507 2007 5600256041542 PhylliteO 28508 2007 5598366041571 PhylliteO 28511 2007 5601216042213 PhylliteO 28513 2007 5601286042223 PhylliteO 28515 2007 5601366042233 PhylliteO 28519 2007 5601316042205 PhylliteO 28526 2007 5601486042208 PhylliteO 58. Outcrop/Sample Number Station YearUTM83_E UTM83_NRock_TypeFloat Description 28528 2007 5601336040973 PyroxeniteO 28529 2007 5601006041065 Carbonatite O 28530 2007 5600376041133 PyroxeniteO 28531 2007 5600066041179 PyroxeniteO 28532 2007 5600896041158 PhylliteO 28534 2007 5599686041013 quartz vein O 28460 2007 5601036042210 phylliteO 59. APPENDIX 2LOCATION OF SOIL SAMPLES 60. Appendix 2 Locations of the 2006-2007 Soil SamplesSampleLineStation Coordinates (NAD1983, UTM Zone 10) Depth YearNumber Number NumberEasting Northing Meter 240512850 055967460435700.3 2006 240522850505596746043520 0.25 2006 240532850100 5596746043470 0.35 2006 240542850150 5596746043420 0.45 2006 240552850200 55967460433700.3 2006 240562850250 5596746043320 0.15 2006 240572850300 55967460432700.4 2006 240582850350 5596746043220 0.45 2006 240592850400 5596746043170 0.35 2006 240602850450 55967460431200.3 2006 240612850500 5596746043070 0.25 2006 240622850550 5596746043020 0.45 2006 240632850600 5596746042970 0.35 2006 240642850650 55967460429200.5 2006 240652850700 5596746042870 0.45 2006 240662850750 55967460428200.4 2006 240672850800 5596746042770 0.45 2006 240682850850 55967460427200.2 2006 240692850900 55967460426700.2 2006 240702850950 5596746042620 0.35 2006 240712850 1000 55967460425700.3 2006 240723000 1050 5598246042520 0.25 2006 240733000 1000 5598246042570 0.15 2006 240743000950 55982460426200.4 2006 240753000900 55982460426700.1 2006 240764200 -100 56102460436700.3 2006 240774200-50 56102460436200.3 2006 2407842000 56102460435700.2 2006 240794200 50 56102460435200.4 2006 240804200100 5610246043470 0.25 2006 240814200150 5610246043420 0.45 2006 240824200200 5610246043370 0.35 2006 240834200250 5610246043320 0.45 2006 240844200300 5610246043270 0.25 2006 240854200350 56102460432200.7 2006 240864200400 5610246043170 0.35 2006 240874200450 5610246043120 0.15 2006 240884200500 5610246043070 0.25 2006 240894200550 56102460430200.3 2006 240904200600 56102460429700.4 2006 240914200650 56102460429200.4 2006 240924200700 56102460428700.3 2006 240934200750 5610246042820 0.45 2006 240944200800 56102460427700.3 2006 240954200850 5610246042720 0.15 2006 240964200900 5610246042670 0.25 2006 240974200950 56102460426200.4 2006 240984200 1000 5610246042570 0.15 2006 2409930000 5598246043570 0.45 2006 61. SampleLineStation Coordinates (NAD1983, UTM Zone 10) Depth YearNumber Number NumberEasting Northing Meter 241003000505598246043520 0.42006 241013000100 5598246043470 0.42006 241023000150 5598246043420 0.52006 241033000200 5598246043370 0.55 2006 241043000250 5598246043320 0.42006 241053000300 5598246043270 0.45 2006 241063000350 55982460432200.6 2006 241073000400 5598246043170 0.65 2006 241083000450 5598246043120 0.45 2006 241093000500 5598246043070 0.35 2006 241103000550 5598246043020 0.55 2006 241113000600 55982460429700.4 2006 241123000650 55982460429200.7 2006 241133000700 5598246042870 0.65 2006 241143000750 5598246042820 0.45 2006 241153000800 55982460427700.5 2006 241163000850 55982460427200.4 2006 241174950 1350 56177460422200.5 2006 241184950 1400 56177460421700.3 2006 241194950 1450 5617746042120 0.45 2006 241204950 1500 5617746042070 0.35 2006 241214950 1550 56177460420200.4 2006 241224950 1600 5617746041970 0.35 2006 241234950 1650 56177460419200.3 2006 241243150 -350 5599746043920 0.45 2006 241253150 -300 55997460438700.3 2006 241263150 -250 5599746043820 0.35 2006 241273150 -200 5599746043770 0.25 2006 241283150 -150 5599746043720 0.35 2006 241293150 -100 5599746043670 0.15 2006 241303150-50 5599746043620 0.35 2006 241313150 055997460435700.5 2006 241323150 50 5599746043520 0.25 2006 241333150100 55997460434700.5 2006 241343150150 55997460434200.7 2006 241353150200 5599746043370 0.55 2006 241363150250 5599746043320 0.35 2006 241373150300 55997460432700.3 2006 241383150350 55997460432200.6 2006 241393150400 5599746043170 0.25 2006 241403150450 55997460431200.2 2006 241413150500 5599746043070 0.45 2006 241423150550 55997460430200.5 2006 241433150600 55997460429700.4 2006 241443150650 55997460429200.5 2006 241453150700 55997460428700.4 2006 241463150750 5599746042820 0.35 2006 241473150800 5599746042770 0.15 2006 241483150850 55997460427200.4 2006 241493150900 5599746042670 0.35 2006 62. SampleLineStation Coordinates (NAD1983, UTM Zone 10) Depth YearNumber Number NumberEasting Northing Meter 241503150950 5599746042620 0.42006 241513300 -200 5601246043770 0.42006 241523300 -150 5601246043720 0.45 2006 241533300 -100 5601246043670 0.45 2006 241543300-50 5601246043620 0.35 2006 241553300 05601246043570 0.35 2006 241563300 50 56012460435200.4 2006 241573300100 5601246043470 0.25 2006 241583300150 56012460434200.1 2006 241593300200 5601246043370 0.35 2006 241603300250 56012460433200.7 2006 241613300300 56012460432700.8 2006 241623300350 56012460432200.4 2006 241633300400 5601246043170 0.25 2006 241643300450 5601246043120 0.35 2006 241653300500 5601246043070 0.25 2006 241663300550 56012460430200.7 2006 241673300600 56012460429700.5 2006 241683300650 5601246042920 0.55 2006 241693300700 5601246042870 0.65 2006 241703300750 5601246042820 0.65 2006 241713300800 56012460427700.6 2006 241723300850 5601246042720 0.25 2006 241733300900 5601246042670 0.35 2006 241743300950 5601246042620 0.35 2006 241753300 1000 5601246042570 0.65 2006 241763000-50 55982460436200.5 2006 241773000 -100 55982460436700.5 2006 241783000 -150 55982460437200.1 2006 241793000 -200 55982460437700.8 2006 241803000 -250 55982460438200.7 2006 241813000 -300 55982460438700.4 2006 241823000 -350 5598246043920 0.35 2006 241833000 -400 55982460439700.4 2006 241843450 -100 56027460436700.4 2006 241853450-50 5602746043620 0.35 2006 2418634500 56027460435700.7 2006 241873450 50 56027460435200.4 2006 241883450100 56027460434700.2 2006 241893450150 5602746043420 0.35 2006 241903450200 5602746043370 0.25 2006 241913450250 56027460433200.2 2006 241923450300 5602746043270 0.35 2006 241933450350 56027460432200.4 2006 241943450400 56027460431700.4 2006 241953450450 5602746043120 0.25 2006 241963450500 56027460430700.4 2006 241973450550 5602746043020 0.45 2006 241983450600 5602746042970 0.45 2006 241993450650 5602746042920 0.35 2006 63. SampleLineStation Coordinates (NAD1983, UTM Zone 10) Depth YearNumber Number NumberEasting Northing Meter 242003450700 5602746042870 0.55 2006 242013450750 5602746042820 0.45 2006 242023450800 56027460427700.5 2006 242033450850 5602746042720 0.45 2006 242043450900 56027460426700.5 2006 242053450950 56027460426200.5 2006 242063450 1000 56027460425700.4 2006 2420736000 56042460435700.4 2006 242083600 50 56042460435200.4 2006 242093600100 56042460434700.4 2006 242103600150 5604246043420 0.45 2006 242113600200 5604246043370 0.35 2006 242123600250 56042460433200.4 2006 242133600300 56042460432700.3 2006 242143600350 56042460432200.4 2006 242153600400 56042460431700.2 2006 242163600450 56042460431200.5 2006 242173600500 56042460430700.2 2006 242183600550 5604246043020 0.25 2006 242193600600 56042460429700.4 2006 242203600650 56042460429200.3 2006 242213600700 56042460428700.3 2006 242223600750 5604246042820 0.42006 242233600800 5604246042770 12006 242243600850 5604246042720 0.52006 242253600900 5604246042670 0.62006 242263600950 5604246042620 0.32006 242273600 1000 5604246042570 0.75 2006 242283750-50 56057460436200.4 2006 2422937500 56057460435700.4 2006 242303750 50 5605746043520 0.45 2006 242313750100 56057460434700.4 2006 242323750150 56057460434200.5 2006 242333750200 56057460433700.6 2006 242343750250 5605746043320 0.65 2006 242353750300 5605746043270 12006 242363750350 56057460432200.7 2006 242373750400 5605746043170 12006 242383750450 56057460431200.4 2006 242393750500 56057460430700.4 2006 242403750550 56057460430200.4 2006 242413750600 5605746042970 -2006 242423750650 56057460429200.5 2006 242433750700 56057460428700.5 2006 242443750750 56057460428200.4 2006 242453750800 5605746042770 0.15 2006 242463750850 56057460427200.3 2006 242473750900 5605746042670 0.45 2006 242483750950 5605746042620 12006 242493750 1000 56057460425700.5 2006 64. SampleLineStation Coordinates (NAD1983, UTM Zone 10) Depth YearNumber Number NumberEasting Northing Meter 242503900 -250 5607246043820 0.52006 242513900 -200 5607246043770 0.65 2006 242523900 -150 5607246043720 0.62006 242533900 -100 5607246043670 0.72006 242543900-50 5607246043620 0.45 2006 242553900 05607246043570 0.35 2006 242563900 50 5607246043520 0.65 2006 242573900100 56072460434700.5 2006 242583900150 56072460434200.3 2006 242593900200 5607246043370 0.45 2006 242603900250 5607246043320 0.55 2006 242613900300 5607246043270 0.35 2006 242623900350 5607246043220 0.25 2006 242633900400 56072460431700.4 2006 242643900450 56072460431200.4 2006 242653900500 5607246043070 0.45 2006 242663900550 56072460430200.5 2006 242673900600 5607246042970 0.25 2006 242683900650 56072460429200.2 2006 242693900700 56072460428700.2 2006 242703900750 5607246042820 0.45 2006 242713900800 5607246042770 0.45 2006 242723900850 5607246042720 0.62006 242733900900 5607246042670 0.45 2006 242743900950 5607246042620 0.72006 242753900 1000 5607246042570 0.52006 242764050 -200 5608746043770 0.45 2006 242774050 -150 5608746043720 0.35 2006 242784050 -100 5608746043670 0.85 2006 242794050-50 56087460436200.8 2006 2428040500 5608746043570 0.75 2006 242814050 50 56087460435200.4 2006 242824050100 5608746043470 0.65 2006 242834050150 56087460434200.4 2006 242844050200 5608746043370 0.55 2006 242854050250 5608746043320 0.35 2006 242864050300 5608746043270 0.45 2006 242874050350 56087460432200.4 2006 242884050400 56087460431700.3 2006 242894050450 5608746043120 0.25 2006 242904050500 56087460430700.5 2006 242914050550 5608746043020 0.25 2006 242924050600 56087460429700.6 2006 242934050650 5608746042920 0.25 2006 242944050700 56087460428700.3 2006 242954050750 5608746042820 0.25 2006 242964050800 5608746042770 0.35 2006 242974050850 56087460427200.3 2006 242984050900 56087460426700.4 2006 242994050950 56087460426200.5 2006 65. SampleLineStation Coordinates (NAD1983, UTM Zone 10) Depth YearNumber Number NumberEasting Northing Meter 243004050 1000 5608746042570 0.55 2006 243014200 2000 56102460415700.1 2006 243024200 1950 5610246041620 0.15 2006 243034200 1900 56102460416700.1 2006 243044200 1850 56102460417200.1 2006 243054200 1800 56102460417700.1 2006 243064200 1750 5610246041820 0.05 2006 243074200 1700 5610246041870 0.08 2006 243084200 1650 5610246041920 0.08 2006 243094200 1600 56102460419700.1 2006 243104200 1550 5610246042020 0.25 2006 243114200 1500 5610246042070 0.15 2006 243124200 1450 56102460421200.1 2006 243134200 1400 5610246042170 0.05 2006 243144200 1350 5610246042220 0.15 2006 243154200 1300 56102460422700.1 2006 243164200 1250 56102460423200.1 2006 243174200 1200 56102460423700.2 2006 243184200 1150 56102460424200.2 2006 243194200 1100 5610246042470 0.15 2006 243204200 1050 56102460425200.1 2006 243214050 1250 56087460423200.1 2006 243224050 1200 5608746042370 0.15 2006 243234050 1150 56087460424200.2 2006 243244050 1100 56087460424700.1 2006 243254050 1050 5608746042520 0.15 2006 243264050 2050 56087460415200.3 2006 243274050 2000 5608746041570 0.25 2006 243284050 1950 5608746041620 0.25 2006 243294050 1900 56087460416700.2 2006 243304050 1850 56087460417200.2 2006 243314050 1800 5608746041770 0.15 2006 243324050 1750 56087460418200.2 2006 243334050 1700 5608746041870 0.15 2006 243344050 1650 56087460419200.1 2006 243354050 1600 5608746041970 0.15 2006 243364050 1550 56087460420200.2 2006 243374050 1500 5608746042070 0.15 2006 243384050 1450 5608746042120 0.15 2006 243394050 1400 56087460421700.1 2006 243404050 1350 5608746042220 0.25 2006 243414050 1300 5608746042270 0.15 2006 285013150 -800 55885860410350.3 2007 285023150 -850 55882860409950.5 2007 285033150 -900 55879860409560.4 2007 285043150 -950 55876860409160.5 2007 2850955983660415710.5 2007 2851056012160422130.3 2007 2851256012860422230.3 2007 2851456013660422330.2 2007 66. SampleLineStation Coordinates (NAD1983, UTM Zone 10) Depth YearNumber Number NumberEasting Northing Meter 285165601466042225 0.32007 285175601386042215 0.42007 285185601316042205 0.12007 285205601236042195 0.32007 285215601166042185 0.32007 285225601266042178 0.32007 285235601336042188 0.22007 285245601416042198 0.22007 285255601486042208 0.32007 285275601566042218 0.32007 285335600896041158 0.32007 285355592196040515 0.32007 284513150 -750 5588886041075 0.32007 284523150 -700 5589186041115 0.42007 284533150 -650 5589496041155 0.32007 284543150 -600 5589796041195 0.52007 284553150 -550 5590096041235 0.32007 284565601136042203 0.42007 2845756010660421932007 284585600966042200 0.42007 284595601036042210 0.42007 284615601116042220 0.32007 2846256011860422300.4 2007 2846356012660422400.3 2007 2846456011660422480.3 2007 2846556010860422380.3 2007 2846656010160422280.3 2007 2846756009360422180.4 2007 2846856008660422080.352007 284693750 -100 55975960412330.3 2007 284703750 -150 55972960411930.3 2007 284713750 -200 55969960411530.3 2007 284723750 -250 55966860411140.3 2007 284733750 -300 55963860410740.3 2007 284743750 -350 55960860410342007 284753750 -400 5595786040994 0.42007 284763750 -450 5595486040954 0.32007 284773750 -500 5595186040914 0.32007 284783750 -550 5594886040874 0.32007 284793750 -600 5594586040834 0.52007 284803750 -650 5594286040794 0.42007 284813750 -700 5593986040754 0.42007 284823750 -750 5593686040714 0.32007 284833750 -800 5593376040674 0.32007 284843750 -850 5593076040634 0.42007 284853750 -900 5592776040594 0.52007 67. APPENDIX 3ACME ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES LTD ANALYTICAL RESULTS
