+ All Categories
Home > Documents > THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING...

THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING...

Date post: 23-Jun-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
70
THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING EVIDENCE, GUIDING POLICY INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH METRICS AND EVALUATION UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT NETWORK THE WORLD BANK EAST ASIA AND PACIFIC REGIONAL EDITION Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized ublic Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized ublic Disclosure Authorized
Transcript
Page 1: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE:

GENERATING EVIDENCE, GUIDING POLICY

INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH METRICS AND EVALUATION

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON

HUMAN DEVELOPMENT NETWORK

THE WORLD BANK

EAST ASIA AND PACIFIC REGIONAL EDITION

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

WB456288
Typewritten Text
WB456288
Typewritten Text
80850
Page 2: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development
Page 3: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH METRICS AND EVALUATION

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON

HUMAN DEVELOPMENT NETWORK

THE WORLD BANK

The Global burden of disease:

GeneraTinG evidence, GuidinG Policy

easT asia and Pacific reGional ediTion

Page 4: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

This report was prepared by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington and the Human Development Network at the World Bank based on seven papers for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 (GBD 2010) published in The Lancet (2012 Dec 13; 380). GBD 2010 had 488 co-authors from 303 institutions in 50 countries. The work was made possible through core funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The views expressed are those of the authors.

The contents of this publication may be reproduced and redistributed in whole or in part, provided the intended use is for noncommercial purposes, the contents are not altered, and full acknowledgment is given to IHME. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/.

For any usage that falls outside of these license restrictions, contact IHME Communications at [email protected].

Citation: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Human Development Network, The World Bank. The Global Burden of Disease: Generating Evidence, Guiding Policy – East Asia and Pacific Regional Edition. Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013.

Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development Network 2301 Fifth Ave., Suite 600 The World Bank Seattle, WA 98121 1818 H St., NWUSA Washington, DC 20433www.healthmetricsandevaluation.org USA www.worldbank.org Contact:Katherine Leach-Kemon Contact:Policy Translation Specialist Anne-Maryse Pierre-Louis [email protected] Public Health Cluster Leader [email protected]

Printed in the United States of America

ISBN 978-0-9894752-2-8 © 2013 Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation

GBDIHME

Page 5: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING EVIDENCE, GUIDING POLICY

EAST ASIA AND PACIFIC REGIONAL EDITION

Glossary 6

introduction 7

The Gbd approach to tracking health progress and challenges 12

rapid health transitions: Gbd 2010 results 16

using Gbd to assess countries’ health progress 43

conclusion 47

annex 49

Page 6: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

4 | GBD 2010

ABOUT IHME

The institute for health Metrics and evaluation (ihMe) is an independent global health research center at the University of Washington that provides rigorous and comparable measurement of the world’s most important health problems and evalu-ates the strategies used to address them. IHME makes this information freely avail- able so that policymakers have the evidence they need to make informed decisions about how to allocate resources to best improve population health.

To express interest in collaborating, participating in GBD training workshops, or receiving updates of GBD or copies of this publication, please contact IHME at:

Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation 2301 Fifth Ave., Suite 600Seattle, WA 98121 USA

Telephone: +1-206-897-2800Fax: +1-206-897-2899E-mail: [email protected] www.healthmetricsandevaluation.org

ABOUT THE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT NETWORK AT THE WORLD BANK GROUP

The World bank Group is one of the world's largest sources of funding and knowl-edge for developing countries. It comprises five closely associated institutions: the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the International De-velopment Association (IDA), which together form the World Bank; the International Finance Corporation (IFC); the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA); and the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). Each in-stitution plays a distinct role in the mission to end extreme poverty and build shared prosperity in the developing world.

The World Bank's Human Development Network (HDN) invests in creating equal op-portunities for people to live healthy and productive lives, secure meaningful jobs, and protect themselves from crises. HDN takes a lifecycle and systems approach to help developing countries deliver equitable and effective education; health, nutri-tion, and population; and social protection and labor services. HDN works across all development sectors and with ministries of finance to demonstrate how these investments in people promote inclusive development; long, healthy, and produc-tive lives; economic growth; and country competitiveness. HDN focuses on results through building strong, integrated systems and country capacity; promoting evi-dence-based policy and program decision-making; and leveraging partnerships with donors and development agencies, civil society, the private sector, and communities

Page 7: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

5 | GBD 2010

to deliver country-tailored solutions. HDN's work helps support the most effective policies, tools, and instruments to make a real difference toward the broader goal of ending extreme poverty and building shared prosperity.

For more information, go to www.worldbank.org/health.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 (GBD 2010) was implemented as a col-laboration between seven institutions: the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) as the coordinating center, the University of Queensland School of Popula-tion Health, Harvard School of Public Health, the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, the University of Tokyo, Imperial College London, and the World Health Organization. This summary draws on seven GBD 2010 papers published in The Lancet (2012 Dec 13; 380). GBD 2010 had 488 co-authors from 303 institutions in 50 countries.

IHME and the World Bank oversaw the production of this publication. In particular, we are grateful to the report’s writer, William Heisel; to Christopher Murray, Michael MacIntyre, Theo Vos, Rafael Lozano, Marie Ng, and Rhonda Stewart at IHME, Anne-Maryse Pierre-Louis of the Human Development Network at the World Bank, and Toomas Palu and team at the World Bank for content guidance; to Ryan Barber and Daniel Dicker for data analysis; to Brittany Wurtz and Summer Ohno for program coordination; to Patricia Kiyono for production oversight and editing; to Katherine Leach-Kemon for writing support and production management; to Rica Asuncion-Reed for editorial support; and to Miriam Alvarado, Ian Bolliger, Roy Burstein, Emily Carnahan, Greg Freedman, Nicole Johns, Katherine Lofgren, and Richard Luning for fact checking. This report would not have been possible without the ongoing contri-butions of Global Burden of Disease collaborators around the world.

Finally, we would like to extend our gratitude to the Human Development Network at the World Bank for co-financing this report, and to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation for generously funding IHME and for its consistent support of the Global Burden of Disease research.

Page 8: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

6 | GBD 2010

GLOSSARY

years of life lost (ylls): Years of life lost due to premature mortality.

years lived with disability (ylds): Years of life lived with any short-term or long-term health loss, adjusted for severity.

disability-adjusted life years (dalys): The sum of years lost due to premature death (YLLs) and years lived with disability (YLDs). DALYs are also defined as years of healthy life lost.

healthy life expectancy, or health-adjusted life expectancy (hale): The number of years that a person at a given age can expect to live in good health, taking into ac-count mortality and disability.

sequelae: Consequences of diseases and injuries.

health states: Groupings of sequelae that reflect key differences in symptoms and functioning.

disability weights: Number on a scale from 0 to 1 that represents the severity of health loss associated with a health state.

risk factors: Potentially modifiable causes of disease and injury.

uncertainty intervals: A range of values that is likely to include the correct estimate of health loss for a given cause. Narrow uncertainty intervals indicate that evidence is strong, while wide uncertainty intervals show that evidence is weaker.

Page 9: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

7 | GBD 2010

INTRODUCTION

The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) approach is a systematic, scientific effort to quantify the comparative magnitude of health loss due to diseases, injuries, and risk factors by age, sex, and geography for specific points in time. Box 1 describes the history of GBD. The latest iteration of that effort, the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2010 (GBD 2010), was published in The Lancet in December 2012. The intent is to create a global public good that will be useful for informing the design of health systems and the creation of public health policy. It estimates premature death and disability due to 291 diseases and injuries, 1,160 sequelae (direct consequences of disease and injury), and 67 risk factors for 20 age groups and both sexes in 1990, 2005, and 2010. GBD 2010 produced estimates for 187 countries and 21 regions. In total, the study generated over 1 billion estimates of health outcomes.

GBD 2010 was a collaborative effort among 488 researchers from 50 countries and 303 institutions. The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) acted as the coordinating center for the study. The collaboration strengthened both the data-gathering effort and the quantitative analysis by bringing together some of the foremost minds from a wide range of disciplines. Our intention is to build on this collaboration by enlarging the network in the years to come. Similarly, IHME and its collaborators hope to expand the list of diseases, injuries, and risk factors included in GBD and routinely update the GBD estimates. Continual updates will ensure that the international community can have access to high-quality estimates in the timeliest fashion. Through sound measurement, we can provide the foundational evidence that will lead to improved population health.

Over the last two decades, the global health landscape has undergone rapid trans-formation. People around the world are living longer than ever before, and the population is getting older. The number of people in the world is growing. Many countries have made remarkable progress in preventing child deaths. As a result, disease burden is increasingly defined by disability instead of premature mortal-ity. The leading causes of death and disability have changed from communicable diseases in children to non-communicable diseases in adults. Eating too much has overtaken hunger as a leading risk factor for illness. While there are clear trends at the global level, there is substantial variation across regions and countries. Nowhere is this contrast more striking than in sub-Saharan Africa, where communicable, ma-ternal, nutritional, and newborn diseases continue to dominate.

In the East Asia and Pacific region, many of the leading causes of health loss were non-communicable diseases. Similar to global trends, most communicable, new-born, nutritional, and maternal causes are becoming less important in this region as non-communicable diseases kill more people prematurely and cause increasing disability. However, the burden from HIV/AIDS increased in certain countries be-tween 2005 and 2010, but decreased during this same period in other countries.

Page 10: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

8 | GBD 2010

HIV/AIDS was one of the five leading causes of disease burden in Malaysia, Myan-mar, and Thailand in 2010. Ischemic heart disease and diabetes are on the rise in most countries in the region. The area has also experienced significant growth in the burden of disease from injuries stemming from road injuries. Risk factors such as dietary risks, high blood pressure, smoking, household and ambient particulate matter (PM) air pollution, high fasting plasma glucose (an indicator of diabetes), alcohol use, and high body mass index (BMI) contributed to the rise of burden from non-communicable diseases in the East Asia and Pacific region, while risks related to illness in children remained prominent in countries such as Cambodia, Laos, and Timor-Leste.

Although demographic changes such as population growth and increasing average age have caused growth in burden from non-communicable diseases in East Asia and Pacific, GBD found that multiple countries are making progress in some of these conditions. This progress can be seen when using measurements called age-stan-dardized rates, which remove the effects of demographic changes to isolate health improvements. Age-standardized rates of non-communicable diseases such as stroke and cirrhosis declined over time in China and Vietnam, and age-standardized rates of cervical cancer declined in Thailand between 2005 and 2010. At the same time, age-standardized rates of ischemic heart disease and lung cancer are rising in many countries, underscoring the region’s mixed success in combatting different non-communicable diseases.

This publication summarizes the global GBD 2010 findings as well as the regional findings for East Asia and Pacific. It also explores intraregional differences in dis-eases, injuries, and risk factors. The overall findings for the region are summarized in the next section.

MAIN FINDINGS FOR EAST ASIA AND PACIFIC:

• The East Asia and Pacific region has made dramatic progress in reducing mor-tality and prolonging life since 1970. The countries that made the most progress in increasing the average age at death between 1970 and 2010 were China, Indonesia, Micronesia, North Korea, Samoa, and Thailand.

• Over the last 20 years, the region has succeeded in decreasing premature death and disability from most communicable, newborn, nutritional, and maternal causes, but HIV/AIDS remains a persistent challenge. For some countries in the region, there have been reductions in the burden from HIV/AIDS since 2005, but HIV/AIDS has risen in other countries during this period. HIV/AIDS ranked among the five leading causes of disability-adjusted life years, or DALYs, in Malaysia, Myanmar, and Thailand.

• Despite improvements, substantial burdens of communicable, newborn, nutritional, and maternal causes persisted in low- and lower-middle-income countries in East Asia and Pacific such as Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Myanmar, Papua New Guinea, Timor-Leste, and Vanuatu.

Page 11: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

9 | GBD 2010

box 1: history of the Global burden of disease and innovations in Gbd 2010

The first GBD study was published as part of the World Development Report 1993. This original study generated estimates for 107 diseases, 483 sequelae (non-fatal health con-sequences), eight regions, and five age groups.

The authors’ inspiration for the study came from the realization that policymakers lacked comprehensive and standardized data on diseases, injuries, and potentially preventable risk factors for decision-making. A second source of inspiration was the fact that disease-specific advocates’ estimates of the number of deaths caused by their diseases of inter-est far exceeded the total number of global deaths in any given year. GBD authors chose to pursue a holistic approach to analyzing disease burden to produce scientifically sound estimates that were independent of the influence of advocates.

The GBD 1990 study had a profound impact on health policy as it exposed the hidden burden of mental illness around the world. It also shed light on neglected health areas such as the premature death and disability caused by road traffic injuries. Work from this study has been cited over 4,000 times since 1993.

The study also sparked substantial controversy. Many disease-specific advocates argued that the original GBD underestimated burden from the causes they cared about most. The use of age weighting and discounting also caused extensive debates. Age weighting assumed that a year of life increased in value until age 22, and then decreased steadily. Discounting counted years of healthy life saved in the present as more valuable than years of life saved in the future. Also controversial was the use of expert judgment to es-timate disability weights (estimations of the severity of non-fatal conditions). As a result of this feedback and consultation with a network of philosophers, ethicists, and econo-mists, GBD no longer uses age weighting and discounting. Also, GBD 2010 updated its methods for determining disability weights and used data gathered from thousands of respondents from different countries around the world.

GBD 2010 shares many of the founding principles of the original GBD 1990 study, such as using all available data on diseases, injuries, and risk factors; using comparable metrics to estimate the impact of death and disability on society; and ensuring that the science of disease burden estimation is not influenced by advocacy.

Despite these similarities, GBD 2010 is broader in scope and involved a larger number of collaborators than any previous GBD study. While the original study had the partici-pation of 100 collaborators worldwide, GBD 2010 had 488 co-authors. Thanks to that network, the study includes vast amounts of data on health outcomes and risk factors. Researchers also made substantial improvements to the GBD methodology, summarized in Box 2 and described in detail in the Annex of this report and in the published studies. Among these improvements, highlights include using data collected via population sur-veys to estimate disability weights for the first time, greatly expanding the list of causes and risk factors analyzed in the study, detailed analysis of the effect of different compo-nents of diet on health outcomes, and reporting of uncertainty intervals for all metrics. GBD 2010 researchers reported uncertainty intervals to provide full transparency about the weaknesses and strengths of the analysis. Narrow uncertainty intervals indicate that evidence is strong, while wide uncertainty intervals show that evidence is weaker.

Page 12: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

10 | GBD 2010

• China is the most epidemiologically advanced country in the region. Similar to developed countries, disease burden in China was dominated by non-communi-cable diseases and injuries. The health progress made by lower-middle-income Vietnam was comparable to upper-middle-income countries in the region.

• Between 1990 and 2010, demographic changes contributed to rising disease burden from many non-communicable causes, especially from stroke, mental disorders such as major depressive disorders and anxiety, musculoskeletal dis-orders including low back pain and neck pain, diabetes, and trachea, bronchus, and lung cancers. Today, diabetes disorders are causing more early death and disability in East Asia and Pacific than two decades ago. Removing the effect of demographic changes on disease patterns by using age-standardized rates, however, reveals that China and Vietnam made progress in reducing stroke and cirrhosis and Thailand successfully reduced age-standardized rates of cervi-cal cancer between 2005 and 2010. At the same time, age-standardized rates of ischemic heart disease and lung cancer are rising in many countries in the region.

• As countries in East Asia and Pacific have become more developed, road inju-ries have taken a growing toll on human health. For example, in Indonesia, Thai-land, and Vietnam, road injuries were among the five leading causes of DALYs.

• The leading causes of disability in the region largely mirrored global trends. Low back pain, neck pain, and other musculoskeletal disorders, as well as men-tal disorders such as depression, were dominant causes of disability in East Asia and Pacific. In contrast to global trends, however, osteoarthritis and diabetes were higher ranking causes of disability in East Asia and Pacific, while drug use disorders, asthma, and Alzheimer’s disease all rank lower in the region as a cause of years lived with disability compared to the world as a whole.

• Risk factors such as dietary risks, high blood pressure, smoking, household and ambient particulate matter air pollution, high fasting plasma glucose, alcohol use, and high BMI were leading risk factors for premature death and disability in East Asia and Pacific. Ambient particulate matter air pollution was a more important cause of disease burden than it was in the world as a whole, largely due to China’s high levels of this risk factor. Risk factors that primarily cause illness in children, such as household air pollution, childhood underweight, iron deficiency, and suboptimal breastfeeding, were important in Cambodia, Laos, and Timor-Leste.

Page 13: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

11 | GBD 2010

box 2: Global burden of disease methodology

GBD uses thousands of data sources from around the world to estimate disease burden. As a first step, GBD researchers estimate child and adult mortality using data sources such as vital and sample registration systems, censuses, and household surveys. Years lost due to premature death from different causes are calculated using data from vital registration with medical certification of causes of death when available and sources such as verbal autopsies in countries where medical certification of causes of death is lacking. Years lived with disability are estimated using sources such as cancer registries, data from outpatient and inpatient facilities, and direct measurements of hearing, vision, and lung function testing. Once they have estimated years lost due to premature death and years lived with disability, GBD researchers sum the two estimates to obtain disabili-ty-adjusted life years. Finally, researchers quantify the amount of premature death and disability attributable to different risk factors using data on exposure to, and the effects of, the different risk factors. For more information about the GBD methods, see the An-nex of this report as well as the published papers.

Page 14: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

12 | GBD 2010

THE GBD APPROACH TO TRACKING HEALTHPROGRESS AND CHALLENGES

For decision-makers striving to create evidence-based policy, the GBD approach pro-vides numerous advantages over other epidemiological studies. These key features are further explored in this report.

A CRITICAL RESOURCE FOR INFORMED POLICYMAKING

To ensure a health system is adequately aligned to a population’s true health chal-lenges, policymakers must be able to compare the effects of different diseases that kill people prematurely and cause ill health. The original GBD study’s creators developed a single measurement, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), to quantify the number of years of life lost as a result of both premature death and disability. One DALY equals one lost year of healthy life. DALYs will be referred to by their acronym, as “years of healthy life lost,” and “years lost due to premature death and disability” throughout this publication. Decision-makers can use DALYs to quickly assess the impact caused by conditions such as cancer versus depression using a comparable metric. Considering the number of DALYs instead of causes of death alone provides a more accurate picture of the main drivers of poor health. Thanks to the use of this public health monitoring tool, GBD 2010 researchers found that in most countries as mortality declines, disability becomes increasingly important. Information about changing disease patterns is a crucial input for decision-making, as it illustrates the challenges that individuals and health care providers are facing in different countries.

In addition to comparable information about the impact of fatal and non-fatal condi-tions, decision-makers need comprehensive data on the causes of ill health that are most relevant to their country. The hierarchical GBD cause list (available on IHME’s website here: http://ihmeuw.org/gbdcauselist), has been designed to include the dis-eases, injuries, and sequelae that are most relevant for public health policymaking. To create this list, researchers reviewed epidemiological and cause of death data to identify which diseases and injuries resulted in the most ill health. Inpatient and out-patient records were also reviewed to understand the conditions for which patients sought medical care. For example, researchers added chronic kidney disease to the GBD cause list after learning that this condition accounted for a large number of hospital visits and deaths.

GBD provides high-quality estimates of diseases and injuries that are more rigorous than those published by disease-specific advocates. GBD was created in part due to researchers’ observation that deaths estimated by different disease-specific stud-ies added up to more than 100% of total deaths when summed. The GBD approach ensures that deaths are counted only once. First, GBD counts the total number of deaths in a year. Next, researchers work to assign a single cause to each death using a variety of innovative methods (see Annex). Estimates of cause-specific mortality

Page 15: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

13 | GBD 2010

are then compared to estimates of deaths from all causes to ensure that the cause-specific numbers do not exceed the total number of deaths in a given year. Other components of the GBD estimation process are interconnected with similar built-in safeguards, such as those for the estimation of impairments that are caused by more than one disease.

Beyond providing a comparable and comprehensive picture of causes of premature death and disability, GBD also estimates the disease burden attributable to differ-ent risk factors. The GBD approach goes beyond risk factor prevalence, such as the number of smokers or heavy drinkers in a population. With comparative risk assess-ment, GBD incorporates both the prevalence of a given risk factor as well as the rela-tive harm caused by that risk factor. It counts premature death and disability attribut-able to high blood pressure, tobacco and alcohol use, lack of exercise, air pollution, poor diet, and other risk factors that lead to ill health.

The flexible design of the GBD machinery allows for regular updates as new data are made available and epidemiological studies are published. Similar to the way in which a policymaker uses gross domestic product data to monitor a country’s economic activity, GBD can be used at the global, national, and local levels to under-stand health trends over time.

Policymakers in Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, Norway, Saudi Arabia, and the United Kingdom are exploring collaborations with IHME to adopt different aspects of the GBD approach. Box 3 contains decision-makers’ and policy-influencers’ reflections about the value of using GBD tools and results to inform policy discussions. GBD data visualization tools (Box 4) on the IHME website allow users to interact with the results in a manner not seen in past versions of the study. Users report that the visualization tools provide a unique, hands-on opportunity to learn about the health problems that different countries and regions face, allowing them to explore

box 3: views on the value of Gbd for policymaking

“While the GBD 2010 offers significant epidemiologic findings that will shape policy debates worldwide, it also limns the gaps in existing disease epidemiology knowledge and offers new ways to improve public health data collection and assessment.” dr. Paul farmer, Chair, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School

“If we look at sub-Saharan Africa, you’ve got the double burden of communicable dis-eases and the rising instances of non-communicable diseases. The dilemma will be how to deal with the non-communicable diseases without compromising what you’ve already been doing for communicable diseases.” dr. christine Kaseba-sata, First Lady of Zambia

“At UNICEF we’ve always had a focus on metrics and outcomes as a driver of the work we do. We welcome the innovation, energy, and attention that this work is bringing to the importance of holding ourselves accountable to meaningful outcomes and results.” dr. Mickey chopra, UNICEF Chief of Health/Associate Director of Programmes

Page 16: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

14 | GBD 2010

seemingly endless combinations of data. The following list illustrates the range of estimates that can be explored using the GBD data visualization tools:

• Changes between 1990 and 2010 in leading causes of death, premature death, disability, and DALYs as well as changes in the amount of health loss attribut-able to different risk factors across age groups, sexes, and locations.

• Rankings for 1990 and 2010 of the leading causes of death, premature death, disability, and DALYs attributable to risk factors across different countries and regions, age groups, and sexes.

• Changes in trends for 21 cause groups in 1990 and 2010 in different regions, sexes, and metrics of health loss.

• The percentage of deaths, premature deaths, disability, or DALYs in a country or region caused by myriad diseases and injuries for particular age groups, sexes, and time periods.

• The percentage of health loss by country or region attributable to specific risk factors by age group, sex, and time period.

In addition to promoting understanding about the major findings of GBD, these visu-alization tools can help government officials build support for health policy changes, allow researchers to visualize data prior to analysis, and empower teachers to illus-trate key lessons of global health in their classrooms.

To use the GBD data visualization tools, visit www.ihmeuw.org/GBDcountryviz.

THE EGALITARIAN VALUES INHERENT IN GBD

When exploring the possibility of incorporating GBD measurement tools into their health information systems, policymakers should consider the egalitarian values on which this approach is founded.

The core principle at the heart of the GBD approach is that everyone should live a long life in full health. As a result, GBD researchers seek to measure the gap between this ideal and reality. Calculation of this gap requires estimation of two dif-ferent components: years of life lost due to premature death (YLLs) and years lived with disability (YLDs).

box 4: Gbd data visualization tools

For the first time in the history of GBD research, IHME has developed many free data vi-sualization tools that allow individuals to explore health trends for different countries and regions. The visualization tools allow people to view GBD estimates through hundreds of different dimensions. Only a few examples are explored in the figures throughout this document. We encourage you to visit the IHME website to use the GBD data visualization tools and share them with others.

Page 17: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

15 | GBD 2010

To measure years lost to premature death, GBD researchers had to answer the question: “How long is a ‘long’ life?” For every death, researchers determined that the most egalitarian answer to this question was to use the highest life expectancy observed in the age group of the person who died. The Annex contains more infor-mation about the estimation of YLLs.

In order to estimate years lived with disability, or YLDs, researchers were confronted with yet another difficult question: “How do you rank the severity of different types of disability?” To determine the answer, researchers created disability weights based on individuals’ perceptions of the impact on people’s lives from a particular disabil-ity, everything from tooth decay to schizophrenia.

GBD REGIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS

GBD 2010 created regions based on two criteria: epidemiological similarity and geo-graphic closeness. The GBD regional groupings differ from the World Bank regional classification system. More information about GBD regional classifications can be found on the IHME website: www.ihmeuw.org/gbdfaq.

Rather than using the GBD regional classifications, this report provides findings based on the countries in World Bank’s regional definition of East Asia and Pacific. Figures reflect World Bank regional classifications. GBD, however, does not produce estimates for territories or countries with fewer than 50,000 people or countries that have only recently come into existence.

Page 18: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

16 | GBD 2010

RAPID HEALTH TRANSITIONS: GBD 2010 RESULTS

In many countries in East Asia and Pacific, loss of healthy life, or DALYs, from non-communicable diseases are rising, while DALYs from communicable, newborn, nutritional, and maternal causes are declining. To help decision-makers establish health service priorities within countries when faced with limited resources, we will explore changes in disease burden around the globe, in the East Asia and Pacific region, and in specific countries in this section. In another section entitled “Using GBD to assess countries’ health progress,” we will compare how well countries are performing in health relative to other countries in the region using a metric called age-standardized rates.

In terms of disease burden at the global level, GBD 2010 found that the leading causes of DALYs have evolved dramatically over the past 20 years. Figure 1 shows the changes in the global leading causes of DALYs in 1990 and 2010. Communicable, newborn, maternal, and nutritional causes are shown in red, non-communicable dis-eases appear in blue, and injuries are shown in green. Dotted lines indicate causes that fell in rank during this period, while solid lines signal causes that rose in rank.

Causes associated with ill health and death in adults, such as ischemic heart dis-ease, stroke, and low back pain, increased in rank between 1990 and 2010, while causes that primarily affect children, such as lower respiratory infections, diarrhea, preterm birth complications, and protein-energy malnutrition, decreased in rank. Unlike most of the leading communicable causes, HIV/AIDS and malaria increased by 353% and 18%, respectively. Since 2005, however, premature mortality and dis-ability from these two causes have begun to decline. Four main trends have driven changes in the leading causes of DALYs globally: aging populations, increases in non-communicable diseases, shifts toward disabling causes and away from fatal causes, and changes in risk factors.

To provide a closer look at the epidemiological changes occurring at the regional level, Figure 2 shows how the leading causes of premature death and disability, or DALYs, have changed over time in East Asia and Pacific. Figures showing changes in the leading causes of DALYs by country can be found in the Annex of this report.

Cerebrovascular disease – or stroke – was the leading cause of premature death and disability in East Asia and Pacific in 2010, and rose from second to first place as a cause of DALYs between 1990 and 2010. Ischemic heart disease was the second leading cause of DALYs in the region.

Certain non-communicable diseases and injuries were much more prominent causes of premature death and disability in East Asia and Pacific compared to the world as a whole. Depression ranked sixth in this region, but ranked 11th globally. At the country level, depression ranked among the five leading causes of DALYs in

Page 19: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

17 | GBD 2010

Malaysia, Thailand, Tonga, and Vietnam. Diabetes also ranked higher in East Asia and Pacific than it ranked at the global level – ninth versus 14th – and was a leading cause of DALYs in most of the smaller countries in the region, including Kiribati, the Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, Samoa, the Solomon Islands, and Tonga.

Of the 25 leading causes of disease burden, trachea, bronchus, and lung cancers showed the biggest increase in terms of DALYs, rising 86% between 1990 and 2010. Diabetes, similar to global trends, rose 76% in the same period. Road injuries also were prominent health problems in the region. While road injuries were the 10th leading cause of disease burden globally, in East Asia and Pacific, they ranked third. The shift in rank between 1990 and 2010 was driven by a 51% increase in DALYs from traffic accidents and other road-related injuries. In Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam, road injuries were among the five leading causes of DALYs.

1 Lower respiratory infections

2 Diarrheal diseases

3 Preterm birth complications

4 Ischemic heart disease

5 Stroke

6 COPD

7 Malaria

8 Tuberculosis

9 Protein-energy malnutrition

10 Neonatal encephalopathy

11 Road injury

12 Low back pain

13 Congenital anomalies

14 Iron-deficiency anemia

15 Major depressive disorder

16 Measles

17 Neonatal sepsis

18 Meningitis

19 Self-harm

20 Drowning

21 Diabetes

22 Falls

23 Cirrhosis

24 Lung cancer

25 Neck pain

29 Other musculoskeletal

33 HIV/AIDS

1 Ischemic heart disease

2 Lower respiratory infections

3 Stroke

4 Diarrheal diseases

5 HIV/AIDS

6 Malaria

7 Low back pain

8 Preterm birth complications

9 COPD

10 Road injury

11 Major depressive disorder

12 Neonatal encephalopathy

13 Tuberculosis

14 Diabetes

15 Iron-deficiency anemia

16 Neonatal sepsis

17 Congenital anomalies

18 Self-harm

19 Falls

20 Protein-energy malnutrition

21 Neck pain

22 Lung cancer

23 Other musculoskeletal

24 Cirrhosis

25 Meningitis

32 Drowning

56 Measles

1.0 (1 to 2)

2.0 (1 to 2)

3.4 (3 to 5)

3.8 (3 to 5)

5.2 (4 to 6)

6.3 (5 to 8)

8.0 (6 to 13)

9.8 (7 to 13)

10.1 (7 to 14)

10.2 (7 to 15)

11.7 (8 to 15)

11.9 (7 to 17)

12.8 (8 to 16)

15.0 (8 to 18)

15.2 (11 to 18)

15.2 (3 to 37)

15.3 (8 to 24)

17.3 (15 to 19)

20.0 (17 to 25)

20.6 (18 to 26)

21.1 (18 to 25)

23.0 (19 to 28)

24.1 (21 to 30)

25.0 (20 to 32)

26.1 (19 to 35)

1.0 (1 to 2)

2.0 (1 to 3)

3.2 (2 to 5)

4.8 (4 to 8)

6.5 (4 to 9)

6.7 (3 to 11)

7.1 (3 to 11)

7.9 (5 to 11)

8.1 (5 to 11)

8.4 (4 to 11)

10.8 (7 to 14)

13.3 (11 to 17)

13.4 (11 to 17)

14.2 (12 to 16)

15.2 (11 to 22)

15.9 (10 to 26)

17.3 (14 to 21)

18.7 (15 to 26)

19.7 (16 to 25)

19.9 (16 to 26)

21.6 (15 to 28)

21.7 (17 to 27)

23.0 (19 to 26)

23.0 (19 to 27)

24.4 (20 to 27)

30 (21 to 34)

-44 (-48 to -39)

21 (5 to 26)

-51 (-57 to -45)

353 (293 to 413)

18 (-9 to 63)

43 (38 to 48)

-27 (-37 to -16)

-2 (-9 to 5)

33 (11 to 63)

37 (25 to 49)

-17 (-30 to -1)

-18 (-34 to -5)

70 (59 to 77)

-3 (-6 to -1)

-4 (-25 to 27)

-28 (-43 to -9)

24 (-1 to 42)

37 (20 to 55)

-42 (-51 to -33)

41 (37 to 46)

38 (18 to 47)

50 (43 to 57)

27 (19 to 36)

-22 (-32 to -12)

Communicable, newborn, nutritional, and maternalNon-communicableInjuries

Ascending order in rankDescending order in rank

1990

Mean rank Disorder(95% UI)

2010

Disorder Mean rank % change (95% UI) (95% UI)

Note: Solid lines indicate a cause that has moved up in rank or stayed the same. Broken lines indicate a cause that has moved down in rank. The causes of DALYs are color coded, with blue for non-communicable diseases, green for injuries, and red for communicable, newborn, nutritional, and maternal causes. COPD: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. To view an interactive version of this figure, visit IHME’s website: http://ihmeuw.org/gbdarrowdiagram.

figure 1: Global disability-adjusted life year ranks, top 25 causes, and percentage change,1990-2010

Page 20: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

18 | GBD 2010

There also were significant decreases in some causes of disease burden. DALYs due to self-harm fell 35% and from drownings, 58%. The burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a term used to describe emphysema and other chronic respiratory diseases, fell by 27%. On the whole, most communicable, newborn, maternal, and nutritional causes of DALYs dropped in rank in East Asia and Pacific, mirroring global trends in the epidemiological transition toward chronic diseases and injuries. The burden from diarrheal diseases, preterm birth complications, and lower respiratory infections fell in nearly every country in the region.

China stood out, in particular, for how advanced it was in transitioning from a pro-file more typical of a developing country to a health picture that is now dominated by non-communicable diseases and injuries. Of the 20 leading causes of DALYs in this country, only one infectious disease remained a leading cause: lower respira-tory infections. The burden from these diseases fell by 80% in China between 1990 and 2010.

Communicable, newborn, nutritional, and maternalNon-communicableInjuries

Ascending order in rankDescending order in rank

1 Lower respiratory infections

2 Stroke

3 COPD

4 Diarrheal diseases

5 Tuberculosis

6 Congenital anomalies

7 Preterm birth complications

8 Ischemic heart disease

9 Road injury

10 Neonatal encephalopathy

11 Low back pain

12 Drowning

13 Major depressive disorder

14 Self-harm

15 Liver cancer

16 Iron-deficiency anemia

17 Stomach cancer

18 Cirrhosis

19 Lung cancer

20 Diabetes

21 Falls

22 Neck pain

23 Meningitis

24 Rheumatic heart disease

25 Other musculoskeletal

31 Chronic kidney disease

121 HIV/AIDS

1 Stroke

2 Ischemic heart disease

3 Road injury

4 COPD

5 Low back pain

6 Major depressive disorder

7 Lung cancer

8 Lower respiratory infections

9 Diabetes

10 Liver cancer

11 Tuberculosis

12 Falls

13 Neck pain

14 Other musculoskeletal

15 Preterm birth complications

16 Self-harm

17 Stomach cancer

18 Congenital anomalies

19 Neonatal encephalopathy

20 Diarrheal diseases

21 Cirrhosis

22 Iron-deficiency anemia

23 HIV/AIDS

24 Chronic kidney disease

25 Drowning

44 Rheumatic heart disease

46 Meningitis

1.0 (1 to 1)

2.3 (2 to 3)

2.7 (2 to 3)

4.6 (4 to 7)

6.2 (4 to 10)

7.0 (4 to 11)

8.3 (4 to 13)

8.5 (5 to 11)

8.7 (4 to 13)

8.9 (4 to 13)

9.6 (4 to 15)

12.2 (9 to 16)

12.4 (7 to 16)

14.5 (12 to 22)

16.2 (14 to 20)

16.9 (12 to 24)

17.7 (13 to 23)

19.3 (16 to 25)

19.4 (14 to 23)

19.6 (16 to 23)

20.2 (16 to 23)

22.1 (15 to 28)

24.7 (21 to 29)

24.7 (22 to 28)

25.9 (23 to 29)

1.0 (1 to 1)

2.2 (2 to 3)

3.8 (2 to 5)

3.8 (3 to 5)

4.4 (2 to 6)

6.7 (5 to 11)

7.8 (6 to 12)

7.8 (6 to 10)

8.7 (6 to 11)

9.6 (6 to 12)

11.0 (9 to 13)

13.0 (11 to 17)

13.4 (9 to 20)

15.1 (13 to 20)

16.5 (13 to 21)

17.0 (10 to 22)

17.6 (12 to 25)

17.7 (13 to 24)

18.2 (13 to 24)

20.0 (15 to 26)

20.0 (14 to 24)

22.5 (13 to 33)

24.7 (21 to 30)

25.2 (22 to 30)

26.2 (19 to 32)

37 (-1 to 46)

76 (42 to 86)

51 (4 to 116)

-27 (-34 to -18)

46 (36 to 58)

29 (6 to 57)

86 (34 to 108)

-72 (-75 to -63)

76 (52 to 89)

42 (26 to 76)

-32 (-45 to -21)

30 (8 to 48)

43 (34 to 52)

53 (41 to 66)

-49 (-60 to -38)

-35 (-45 to 40)

-9 (-21 to 6)

-54 (-67 to -36)

-51 (-62 to -38)

-62 (-73 to -56)

-15 (-24 to 36)

-28 (-31 to -25)

1,576 (1,262 to 1,944)

58 (26 to 73)

-58 (-65 to -26)

1990

Mean rank Disorder(95% UI)

2010

Disorder Mean rank % change (95% UI) (95% UI)

Note: Solid lines indicate a cause that has moved up in rank or stayed the same. Broken lines indicate a cause that has moved down in rank. The causes of DALYs are color coded, with blue for non-communicable diseases, green for injuries, and red for communicable, newborn, nutritional, and maternal causes.

figure 2: disability-adjusted life year ranks, top 25 causes, and percentage change in east asia and Pacific, 1990-2010

Page 21: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

19 | GBD 2010

HIV/AIDS did increase in terms of DALYs by 1,576% between 1990 and 2010. There have been reductions in the burden from HIV/AIDS in multiple countries in the region since 2005, but it remained among the five leading causes of DALYs in Malaysia, Myanmar, and Thailand. HIV/AIDS has risen in China, Indonesia, and the Philippines since 2005.

MOST OF THE WORLD’S POPULATION IS LIVING LONGER AND DYING AT LOWER RATES

In much of the world, GBD 2010 found that people are living to older ages than ever before, and the entire population is getting older. Since 1970, the average age of death has increased 20 years globally. Dramatic changes have occurred during this period in Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East, where the average age of death increased by 30 years or more. Sub-Saharan Africa, however, has not made nearly as much progress as other developing regions, and people in this part of the world tend to die at much younger ages than in any other region. Progress in sub-Saharan Africa has in particular been held back by the HIV/AIDS epidemic, maternal deaths, and child mortality caused by infectious diseases and malnutrition, but some of these trends have begun to change in the past decade.

In East Asia and Pacific, the countries that made most progress in increasing the average age at death between 1970 and 2010 were China, Indonesia, Micronesia, North Korea, Samoa, and Thailand (Figure 3). All of these countries saw increases in the mean age of death by 25 years or more. Most of the other countries in the region succeeded in extending the average age at death between 15 and 24 years. The Solomon Islands saw an increase of only 12 years between 1970 and 2010. While globally the biggest increases in the mean age of death have tended to be in higher-income countries, East Asia and Pacific presents a mixed picture. The country with the biggest increase was North Korea, one of only three low-income countries in the region, ranking it among the fastest increases in the world, alongside upper-middle-income countries such as the Dominican Republic, Iran, and the Maldives. By contrast, Malaysia, an upper-middle-income country, saw a slower increase than Cambodia and Myanmar, the two other low-income countries in the region.

Yet another way to understand changes in global demographic trends is to explore reductions in mortality rates by sex and age group. Figure 4 shows how death rates have declined in all age groups between 1970 and 2010. These changes have been most dramatic among males and females aged 0 to 9 years, whose death rates have dropped over 60% since 1970. Among age groups 15 and older, the decrease in female death rates since 1970 has been greater than the drop in male death rates. The gap in progress between men and women was largest between the ages of 15 and 54, most likely due to the persistence of higher mortality from injuries, as well as alcohol and tobacco use, among men.

Page 22: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

20 | GBD 2010

Figure 5 shows decreases in mortality rates in East Asia and Pacific. There were declines in every age group between 1970 and 2010, ranging from 12% for men aged 80 and older to more than 88% in males and females in the 1- to 4-year-old age group between 1970 and 2010.

As with the global results, women in most age groups in the region experienced greater declines in death rates than men. The most dramatic differences appeared in the 15 to 44 year age groups. Women between 20 and 24, for example, saw a 70.5% decline in mortality while men only saw a 43% decline.

15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 8515

20

25

30

35

40

45

Mean age at death in 2010 (years)

Mea

n ag

e at

dea

th in

197

0 (y

ears

)

China

Fiji

Federated States of Micronesia

IndonesiaCambodia

Kiribati

Laos

Marshall Islands

Myanmar

Mongolia

Malaysia

PhilippinesPapua New Guinea

North Korea

Solomon Islands

Thailand

Timor-Leste

Tonga

Vietnam

Vanuatu Samoa

Note: Countries falling on the right side of the 45-degree-angle line had a greater average age of death in 2010 compared to 1970.

figure 3: average age of death for countries in east asia and Pacific region, 1970 compared with 2010

Page 23: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

21 | GBD 2010

figure 4: Global decline in age-specific mortality rate, 1970-2010

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

% d

eclin

e in

mor

talit

y ra

te, 1

970

- 201

0

Age

MaleFemale

<1

1-4

5-9

10-1

4

15-1

9

20-2

4

25-2

9

30-3

4

35-3

9

40-4

4

45-4

9

50-5

4

55-5

9

60-6

4

65-6

9

70-7

4

75-7

9

+80

figure 5: decline in age-specific mortality rate in east asia and Pacific, 1970-2010

Age

% d

eclin

e in

mor

talit

y ra

te, 1

970

- 201

0

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

<1

1-4

5-9

10-1

4

15-1

9

20-2

4

25-2

9

30-3

4

35-3

9

40-4

4

45-4

9

50-5

4

55-5

9

60-6

4

65-6

9

70-7

4

75-7

9

+80

Male

Female

Note: Higher values indicate greater declines in mortality; lower values indicate smaller declines in mortality.

Note: Higher values indicate greater declines in mortality; lower values indicate smaller declines in mortality.

Page 24: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

22 | GBD 2010

LEADING CAUSES OF DEATH ARE SHIFTING TO NON-COMMUNICABLE DISEASES

In part because many people are living longer lives and the population is growing older, the leading causes of death have changed. Worldwide, the number of people dying from non-communicable diseases, such as ischemic heart disease and diabe-tes, has grown 30% since 1990. To a lesser extent, overall population growth also contributed to this increase in deaths from non-communicable diseases.

The rise in the total number of deaths from non-communicable diseases has in-creased the number of healthy years lost, or DALYs, from these conditions. Figure 6 shows global changes in the 25 leading causes of DALYs between 1990 and 2010 ordered from highest to lowest ranking cause from top to bottom.

Figure 7 shows the changes in the leading causes of premature death and disability in the East Asia and Pacific region from 1990 to 2010. Conditions such as ischemic heart disease, lung cancer, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease were the non-com-municable diseases that experienced the most growth in this region. COPD, stomach cancer, congenital anomalies, and cirrhosis declined.

Globally, non-communicable diseases accounted for 54% of all DALYs in 2010. Com-municable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional causes accounted for 35% of DALYs, and injuries made up the remaining 11%. In most countries outside of sub-Saharan Africa, non-communicable diseases caused 50% or more of all DALYs. In Australia, Japan, and richer countries in Western Europe and North America, the percentage was greater than 80%.

Figure 8 shows the important role played by non-communicable diseases in the East Asia and Pacific region. Singapore had the highest percentage of DALYs due to non-communicable diseases (84%), while Timor-Leste had the lowest percentage of DALYs from these conditions (41%).

An in-depth look at the country-level data reveals the specific diseases that are driv-ing overall shifts from communicable to non-communicable diseases. As an ex-ample, Figure 9 displays the changes in the top 20 causes of DALYs in females in the Philippines between 1990 and 2010. The causes are organized by rank from top tobottom. Most non-communicable diseases rose over time. Among the top 20 causes in 2010, diabetes increased the most (288%); followed by breast cancer, which grew 200%; and chronic kidney disease and stroke, which each grew by more than 100%. Of the non-communicable diseases, asthma had the slowest rise at just 18% between 1990 and 2010, a trend seen throughout the region. Among communi-cable, nutritional, newborn, and maternal conditions, lower respiratory infections experienced the most dramatic decline, falling by 47%. Unlike many countries in the region and throughout the world, diarrheal diseases actually saw an increase of 37%, and many other communicable, newborn, nutritional, and maternal conditions also rose.

Page 25: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

23 | GBD 2010

figure 6: Global shifts in leading causes of dalys, 1990-2010

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

% change in total DALYs, 1990-2010

-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

MENINGITIS

CIRRHOSIS

OTHER MUSCULOSKELETAL

LUNG CANCER

NECK PAIN

PROTEIN-ENERGY MALNUTRITION

FALLS

SELF-HARM

CONGENITAL ANOMALIES

NEONATAL SEPSIS

IRON-DEFICIENCY ANEMIA

DIABETES

TUBERCULOSIS

NEONATAL ENCEPHALOPATHY

MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER

ROAD INJURY

COPD

PRETERM BIRTH COMPLICATIONS

LOW BACK PAIN

MALARIA

HIV/AIDS

DIARRHEAL DISEASES

STROKE

LOWER RESPIRATORY INFECTIONS

ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE

Communicable, newborn, nutritional, and maternalNon-communicableInjuries

Note: The leading 25 causes of DALYs are ranked from top to bottom in order of the number of DALYs they contributed in 2010. Bars to the right of the vertical line show the percent by which DALYs have increased since 1990. Bars on the left show the percent by which DALYs have decreased. Pointed arrows indicate causes that have increased by a greater amount than shown on the x-axis.

Page 26: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

24 | GBD 2010

figure 7: shifts in leading causes of dalys in east asia and Pacific, 1990-2010

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

% change in total DALYs, 1990-2010

-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

DROWNING

CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE

HIV/AIDS

IRON-DEFICIENCY ANEMIA

CIRRHOSIS

DIARRHEAL DISEASES

NEONATAL ENCEPHALOPATHY

CONGENITAL ANOMALIES

STOMACH CANCER

SELF-HARM

PRETERM BIRTH COMPLICATIONS

OTHER MUSCULOSKELETAL

NECK PAIN

FALLS

TUBERCULOSIS

LIVER CANCER

DIABETES

LOWER RESPIRATORY INFECTIONS

LUNG CANCER

MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER

LOW BACK PAIN

COPD

ROAD INJURY

ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE

STROKE

Communicable, newborn, nutritional, and maternalNon-communicableInjuries

Note: The leading 25 causes of DALYs are ranked from top to bottom in order of the number of DALYs they contributed in 2010. Bars to the right of the vertical line show the percent by which DALYs have increased since 1990. Bars on the left show the percent by which DALYs have decreased. Pointed arrows indicate causes that have increased by a greater amount than shown on the x-axis.

Page 27: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

25 | GBD 2010

figure 8: Percent of global dalys due to non-communicable diseases, 2010

< 10

%

10−1

9%

20−2

9%

30−3

9%

40−4

9%

50−5

9%

60−6

9%

70−7

9%

80%

+

CA

RIB

BE

AN

LCA

DM

A

AT

G

TTO

GR

D

VC

T

TLS

MD

V

BR

B

SY

C

MU

S

CO

M

PER

SIA

N G

ULF

W A

FRIC

AE

ME

D.

MLT

SG

PB

ALK

AN

PE

NIN

SU

LATO

N

WS

M

FSM

KIR

FJI

VU

T

SLB

MH

L

Page 28: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

26 | GBD 2010

Figure 10 shows declines in DALYs among males in the Philippines from some com-municable, nutritional, and newborn conditions coupled with increases in non-com-municable diseases and injuries between 1990 and 2010. As with females, however, DALYs due to diarrheal diseases and neonatal encephalopathy increased. Out of all the non-communicable diseases shown in Figure 10, diabetes increased the most over the period (294%). Other leading causes of DALYs saw a doubling of the related disease burden, including chronic kidney disease (179%), hypertensive heart disease (178%), cirrhosis (158%), and interpersonal violence (134%). The Philippines was one of the few countries in the region where violence was among the five leading causes of DALYs for males.

Another visualization tool, GBD Compare, displays proportional changes in disease patterns over time using a treemap diagram, which is essentially a square pie chart.

figure 9: shifts in leading causes of dalys for females, Philippines, 1990-2010

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

% change in total DALYs, 1990-2010

-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE

ANXIETY DISORDERS

MIGRAINE

OTHER MUSCULOSKELETAL

NECK PAIN

BREAST CANCER

NEONATAL ENCEPHALOPATHY

DIARRHEAL DISEASES

ASTHMA

COPD

DIABETES

IRON-DEFICIENCY ANEMIA

CONGENITAL ANOMALIES

TUBERCULOSIS

LOW BACK PAIN

PRETERM BIRTH COMPLICATIONS

STROKE

MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER

ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE

LOWER RESPIRATORY INFECTIONS

Communicable, newborn, nutritional, and maternalNon-communicable

Note: The leading 20 causes of DALYs are ranked from top to bottom in order of the number of DALYs they contributed in 2010. Bars to the right of the vertical line show the percent by which DALYs have increased since 1990. Bars on the left show the percent by which DALYs have decreased. Pointed arrows indicate causes that have increased by a greater amount than shown on the x-axis.

Page 29: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

27 | GBD 2010

figure 10: shifts in leading causes of dalys for males, Philippines, 1990-2010

% change in total DALYs, 1990-2010

-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

LUNG CANCER

HYPERTENSIVE HEART DISEASE

CIRRHOSIS

CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE

IRON-DEFICIENCY ANEMIA

ASTHMA

DIARRHEAL DISEASES

NEONATAL ENCEPHALOPATHY

MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER

DIABETES

CONGENITAL ANOMALIES

COPD

ROAD INJURY

LOW BACK PAIN

PRETERM BIRTH COMPLICATIONS

INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE

STROKE

TUBERCULOSIS

LOWER RESPIRATORY INFECTIONS

ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

Communicable, newborn, nutritional, and maternalNon-communicableInjuries

Note: The leading 20 causes of DALYs are ranked from top to bottom in order of the number of DALYs they contributed in 2010. Bars to the right of the vertical line show the percent by which DALYs have increased since 1990. Bars on the left show the percent by which DALYs have decreased. Pointed arrows indicate causes that have increased by a greater amount than shown on the x-axis.

Causes of DALYs are shown in boxes. The size of each box represents the percent-age of total DALYs due to a specific cause. Figures 11a and 11b show how DALYs changed in Indonesia between 1990 and 2010. In 1990, non-communicable diseases accounted for 37% of DALYs in both sexes, while communicable, nutritional, mater-nal, and newborn causes accounted for 56%. Injuries made up the remaining 7%. By 2010, non-communicable diseases represented 58% of total disease burden. Com-municable, nutritional, maternal, and newborn causes shrank to 33%, and injuries increased to 9%.

Premature death and disability from most communicable, nutritional, maternal, and newborn causes decreased during this period. The amount of health loss from most of the leading communicable diseases fell dramatically, with tetanus, syphilis, mea-sles, meningitis, malaria, and lower respiratory infections all declining by more than

Page 30: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

28 | GBD 2010

STROKE

LUN

G

FALLS ROAD INJURY

AS

TH

MA

OT

H R

ES

P

DROWN

TH

ALA

SS

HTN HEART

OTH CIRC

CMP

RH

EU

MH

D

OTH UNINTENT

PO

ISO

N

OT

H T

RA

NS

MEASLES

ALCOHOL

SCHIZO

BIPOLAR

ME

NIN

GIT

IS

WHOOPINGCOUGH

ASCAR

TETANUS

MATERNAL

SY

PH

ILIS

OTH INF

NE

ON

AT

AL S

EP

SIS

OT

HE

R N

EO

NA

TA

L D

ISO

RD

ER

S

DR

UG

S

AN

XIE

TY

DYSTHYMIABR

EA

ST

LEU

KE

MIA

ST

OM

AC

HC

ER

VIX

EP

ILEP

SY

MIG

RA

INE

CIR

RH

OS

IS

DIA

BE

TE

S

CO

PD

CK

DLOW BACK PAIN

CO

NG

EN

ITA

L A

NO

MA

LIES

NECK PAIN

HE

AR

ING

OS

TE

OO

TH

MU

SC

ULO

EC

ZE

MA

ACNE

TYPHOID

MALARIA

DIA

RR

HE

A

PROTEIN‐ENERGY MALNUTRITION

MA

JOR

D

EP

RE

SS

IVE

D

ISO

RD

ER

ISC

HE

MIC

HE

AR

T D

ISE

AS

E

LOWER RESPIRATORY INFECTIONS

PR

ET

ER

M

BIR

TH

C

OM

PLIC

AT

ION

S

NE

ON

AT

AL

EN

CE

PH

ALO

PA

TH

Y

IRON‐DEFICIENCY ANEMIA

TUBERCULOSIS

Communicable, newborn, nutritional, and maternal

Annual % change, 2005 to 2010, DALYs per 100,000

Non-communicableInjuries

3% 2% 1% 0% -1% -2% -3%

figure 11a: causes of dalys, both sexes, all ages, indonesia, 1990

Note: The size of each box in this square pie chart represents the percentage of total DALYs caused by a particular disease or injury. To view an interactive version of this figure, visit IHME’s website: http://ihmeuw.org/gbdcompare.

Page 31: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

29 | GBD 2010

FALLS

ROAD INJURYSTROKE

DIA

BE

TE

S

AS

TH

MA

OT

H R

ES

PC

HR

ON

IC

OB

ST

RU

CT

IVE

P

ULM

ON

AR

Y

DIS

EA

SE

LOW BACK PAIN

NECK PAIN

HTN HEART

OTH CIRC CMP

DROWN

FIRE

DR

UG

S

AN

XIE

TY

ALCOHOL

THALASS

DYSTHYMIA

RHEUMHD

BRAIN

SELF-HARM

OTH NTD

OTH NEURO ALZH

PEM

MEASLES

VIOLENCE

SCHIZO

BIPOLAR

BR

EA

ST

LEU

KE

MIA

ME

CH

AN

ICA

L FO

RC

ES

OV

AR

Y

AU

TIS

M

ME

NIN

GIT

IS

OT

H N

EO

OT

H IN

F

MA

TE

RN

AL

HIV

AA

ST

OM

AC

H

CE

RV

IX

NA

SO

LUN

GC

AN

CE

R

LIVE

R

HE

AR

ING

MIGRAINE

EP

ILEP

SY

CIRRHOSIS

OS

TE

O

PC

O

OT

HE

ND

O

OT

H M

US

CU

LO

EC

ZE

MA

AC

NE

TYPHOID

MALARIA

DIA

RR

HE

A

ISC

HE

MIC

HE

AR

T D

ISE

AS

E

NEONATAL SEPSIS

MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER

LOW

ER

R

ES

PIR

AT

OR

Y

INFE

CT

ION

S

CONGENITAL ANOMALIES

PR

ET

ER

M

BIR

TH

C

OM

PLIC

AT

ION

S

NE

ON

AT

AL

EN

CE

PH

ALO

PA

TH

YIR

ON‐

DE

FICIE

NC

Y

AN

EM

IA

TUBERCULOSIS

CH

RO

NIC

KID

NE

Y

DIS

EA

SE

S

Communicable, newborn, nutritional, and maternal

Annual % change, 2005 to 2010, DALYs per 100,000

Non-communicableInjuries

3% 2% 1% 0% -1% -2% -3%

figure 11b: causes of dalys, both sexes, all ages, indonesia, 2010

Note: The size of each box in this square pie chart represents the percentage of total DALYs caused by a particular disease or injury. To view an interactive version of this figure, visit IHME’s website: http://ihmeuw.org/gbdcompare.

Page 32: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

30 | GBD 2010

50%. Still, the considerable burden of tuberculosis in Indonesia, and in other coun-tries in the region, kept it as the second-leading cause of disease burden in 2010, ac-counting for over 5.8 million DALYs. DALYs from acute hepatitis C increased. At the same time, DALYs from many non-communicable causes rose. Increases occurred in causes such as lung cancer (105% increase), cirrhosis (95% increase), chronic kidney disease (90% increase), diabetes (86% increase), ischemic heart disease (85% in-crease), and stroke (76% increase). Between 1990 and 2010, health loss from injuries such as road traffic injuries and falls increased 36% and 52%, respectively.

DISABILITY INCREASES IN MIDDLE- AND HIGH-INCOME COUNTRIES

Most countries in the world have succeeded in reducing deaths early in life. To a growing extent, longer lives are redefining “old age” in many countries, and people in all age groups are dying at lower rates than in the past. Simply living longer does not mean that people are healthier. Little progress has been made in reducing the prevalence of disability, so people are living to an older age but experiencing more ill health. Many people suffer from different forms of disability throughout their lives, such as mental and behavioral health problems starting in their teens, and musculoskeletal disorders beginning in middle age. These findings have far-reach-ing implications for health systems.

DALYs, or healthy years lost, are calculated by adding together years lived with disability (YLDs) and years of life lost (YLLs, also known as years lost to premature death). Between 1990 and 2010, years lived with disability increased as a percent-age of total DALYs in all areas of the world except Eastern Europe, southern sub-Saharan Africa, and the Caribbean. This disability transition has been most dramatic in the Middle East and North Africa, parts of Latin America, and many parts of Asia. The percentage of burden from YLDs also increased in sub-Saharan Africa with the exception of the southern part of the region.

Figure 12 tells a detailed story about the different conditions that caused disability globally in 2010. It is important to keep in mind that these estimates reflect both how many individuals suffered from a particular condition as well as the severity of that condition. Mental and behavioral disorders, such as depression, anxiety, and drug use, were the primary drivers of disability worldwide and caused over 40 million years of disability in 20- to 29-year-olds. Musculoskeletal conditions, which include low back pain and neck pain, accounted for the next largest number of years lived with disability. People aged 45 to 54 were most impacted by these conditions, as musculoskeletal disorders caused over 30 million years of disability in each of these age groups.

Figure 13 shows disability patterns in East Asia and Pacific. Similar to the global dis-ability results, mental and behavioral as well as musculoskeletal disorders dominat-ed in this region. As seen in the world as a whole, most disability in children under 5 was from nutritional deficiencies in East Asia and Pacific.

Page 33: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

31 | GBD 2010

Other communicableNutritional deficienciesNeonatal disordersMaternal disordersNTD & malariaDiarrhea/LRI/other infectiousHIV/AIDS & tuberculosis

War & disasterIntentional injuriesUnintentional injuriesTransport injuriesOther non-communicableMusculoskeletal disordersDiabetes/urogen/blood/endo

Mental & behavioral disordersNeurological disordersDigestive diseasesCirrhosisChronic respiratory diseasesCardio & circulatory diseasesCancer

0-6

DA

YS

7-27

DA

YS

28-3

64 D

AY

S

1-4

YE

AR

S

5-9

YE

AR

S

10-1

4 Y

EA

RS

15-1

9 Y

EA

RS

20-2

4 Y

EA

RS

25-2

9 Y

EA

RS

30-3

4 Y

EA

RS

35-3

9 Y

EA

RS

40-4

4 Y

EA

RS

45-4

9 Y

EA

RS

50-5

4 Y

EA

RS

55-5

9 Y

EA

RS

60-6

4 Y

EA

RS

65-6

9 Y

EA

RS

70-7

4 Y

EA

RS

75-7

9 Y

EA

RS

80+

YE

AR

S

YLD

s

AGE

0.0

5M

10M

15M

20M

25M

30M

35M

40M

45M

50M

55M

60M

figure 12: Global disability patterns by broad cause group and age, 2010

Note: The size of the colored portion in each bar represents the number of YLDs attributable to each cause for a given age group. The height of each bar shows total YLDs for a given age group in 2010. The causes are aggregated. For example, musculoskeletal disorders include low back pain and neck pain. To view an interactive version of this figure, visit IHME’s website: http://ihmeuw.org/gbdcausepattern.

Page 34: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

32 | GBD 2010

Other communicableNutritional deficienciesNeonatal disordersMaternal disordersNTD & malariaDiarrhea/LRI/other infectiousHIV/AIDS & tuberculosis

War & disasterIntentional injuriesUnintentional injuriesTransport injuriesOther non-communicableMusculoskeletal disordersDiabetes/urogen/blood/endo

Mental & behavioral disordersNeurological disordersDigestive diseasesCirrhosisChronic respiratory diseasesCardio & circulatory diseasesCancer

0-6

DA

YS

7-27

DA

YS

28-3

64 D

AY

S

1-4

YE

AR

S

5-9

YE

AR

S

10-1

4 Y

EA

RS

15-1

9 Y

EA

RS

20-2

4 Y

EA

RS

25-2

9 Y

EA

RS

30-3

4 Y

EA

RS

35-3

9 Y

EA

RS

40-4

4 Y

EA

RS

45-4

9 Y

EA

RS

50-5

4 Y

EA

RS

55-5

9 Y

EA

RS

60-6

4 Y

EA

RS

65-6

9 Y

EA

RS

70-7

4 Y

EA

RS

75-7

9 Y

EA

RS

80+

YE

AR

S

YLD

s

AGE

0.0

2M

4M

6M

8M

10M

12M

14M

16M

18M

20M

figure 13: disability patterns by broad cause group and age in east asia and Pacific, 2010

Note: The size of the colored portion in each bar represents the number of YLDs attributable to each cause for a given age group. The height of each bar shows total YLDs for a given age group in 2010. The causes are aggregated. For example, musculoskeletal disorders include low back pain and neck pain.

Another way to view the world’s health challenges is by comparing how differ-ent conditions rank. Figure 14 ranks the leading causes of disability in the world and each of the six World Bank regions, using color coding to indicate how high a condition ranks in a region. Low back pain caused the most disability in East Asia and Pacific, Europe and Central Asia, and in the Middle East and North Africa. This condition can inhibit people’s ability to perform different types of work both inside and outside the home and impair their mobility. In addition to low back pain, neck pain and other musculoskeletal disorders ranked in the top 10 causes of disability in most regions. Another musculoskeletal disorder, osteoarthritis, appeared in the top 20 causes of disability in every region.

Page 35: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

33 | GBD 2010

Depression was a major cause of disability across regions and was one of the top three causes of disability in every region. This disorder can cause fatigue, decreased ability to work or attend school, and suicide. Anxiety, a different type of mental disorder, was one of the top 10 causes of disability in all regions. Additionally, two other mental disorders, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, appeared among the top 20 causes of disability in many regions.

While mental and musculoskeletal disorders ranked high among causes of disability across regions, Figure 14 also reveals substantial regional variation among other causes. Iron-deficiency anemia was the leading cause of disability in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, but it was less important as a cause of disability in the other regions. The substantial burden in these two regions contributed to iron-deficiency

GLO

BA

L

EA

ST

AS

IA &

PA

CIF

IC

EU

RO

PE

& C

EN

TR

AL

AS

IA

LAT

IN A

ME

RIC

A &

CA

RIB

BE

AN

MID

DLE

EA

ST

& N

OR

TH

AFR

ICA

SO

UT

H A

SIA

SU

B-S

AH

AR

AN

AFR

ICA

LOW BACK PAIN

MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER

IRON-DEFICIENCY ANEMIA

NECK PAIN

COPD

OTHER MUSCULOSKELETAL

ANXIETY DISORDERS

MIGRAINE

DIABETES

FALLS

OSTEOARTHRITIS

DRUG USE DISORDERS

OTHER HEARING LOSS

ASTHMA

ALCOHOL USE DISORDERS

ROAD INJURY

BIPOLAR DISORDER

SCHIZOPHRENIA

DYSTHYMIA

EPILEPSY

ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE

ECZEMA

DIARRHEAL DISEASES

ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE

TUBERCULOSIS

1-10 11-20 21-30 31-50 51-90

1 1 1 2 1 2 3

2 2 2 1 2 3 2

3 6 5 5 3 1 1

4 3 3 3 6 7 6

5 5 11 13 8 4 4

6 4 4 6 7 8 11

7 10 7 4 4 6 5

8 11 8 7 12 5 13

9 7 6 10 5 10 23

10 9 9 16 11 12 25

11 8 10 11 9 19 18

12 17 16 9 10 9 17

13 12 13 15 16 11 12

14 23 21 8 13 14 10

15 13 12 12 37 15 34

16 16 14 21 14 13 22

17 15 17 17 15 16 20

18 14 18 18 18 22 29

19 18 19 19 19 20 26

20 20 22 14 20 26 14

21 19 15 24 23 31 40

22 22 23 20 21 21 21

23 25 28 22 17 23 15

24 34 20 26 39 49 62

25 21 30 42 22 17 24

figure 14: rankings of leading causes of disability by region, 2010

Note: In this figure, shading is used to indicate the ranking of each cause of disability in a particular region.

Page 36: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

34 | GBD 2010

anemia’s ranking as the third-leading cause of disability at the global level. Iron-deficiency anemia can lead to fatigue and lowered ability to fight infection, and may decrease cognitive ability.

COPD was the fourth top cause of disability in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, and it ranked fifth for the East Asia and Pacific region. In many other regions, COPD appeared in the list of the top 10 causes.

In East Asia and Pacific, many of the leading causes of disability were similar to global rankings, but there were key differences. Drug use disorders, asthma, and Alzheimer’s disease all ranked lower as causes of years lived with disability in this region than they did in the world as a whole.

Other causes of disability were more important in East Asia and Pacific compared to global trends. Osteoarthritis was the eleventh cause of disability globally, but ranked eighth in East Asia and Pacific. Diabetes also ranked higher in this region compared to the world as a whole. Diabetes was the ninth-leading cause of disability globally, but ranked seventh in East Asia and Pacific.

Using GBD tools to identify leading causes of disability, such as mental and behav-ioral disorders and musculoskeletal disorders, can help guide health system plan-ning and medical education. Decision-makers can use GBD’s findings to ensure that health care systems are designed to address the primary drivers of disability in a cost effective way.

THE GLOBAL RISK FACTOR TRANSITION

Data on potentially modifiable causes of health loss, or risk factors, can help poli-cymakers and donors prioritize prevention strategies to achieve maximum health gains. GBD tools estimate the number of deaths, premature deaths, years lived with disability, and DALYs attributable to 67 risk factors worldwide. This study benefited from the availability of new data, such as newly available epidemiologic evidence about the health impacts of different risk factors; population, nutrition, health, and medical examination surveys; and high-resolution satellite data on air pollution.

Figure 15 shows changes in the 15 leading global risk factors for premature death and disability, or DALYs, between 1990 and 2010. Over this period, many risk fac-tors that primarily cause communicable diseases in children declined. Examples of these risk factors are childhood underweight and suboptimal breastfeeding, which dropped by 61% and 57%, respectively, from 1990 to 2010. Childhood underweight is commonly used to measure malnutrition, and was formerly the leading risk factor for DALYs in 1990, but ranked eighth in 2010. DALYs attributable to household air pollution, which contributes to lower respiratory tract infections in children, dropped by 37% between 1990 and 2010. Unlike other risk factors that primarily cause DALYs from communicable diseases, progress in reducing premature death and disability from iron deficiency was much lower, declining by just 7% between 1990 and 2010.

Page 37: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

35 | GBD 2010

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

% change in total DALYs, 1990-2010

-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

DRUG USE

HIGH TOTAL CHOLESTEROL

SUBOPTIMAL BREASTFEEDING

IRON DEFICIENCY

OCCUPATIONAL RISKS

PHYSICAL INACTIVITY

AMBIENT PM POLLUTION

CHILDHOOD UNDERWEIGHT

HIGH FASTING PLASMA GLUCOSE

HIGH BODY MASS INDEX

ALCOHOL USE

HOUSEHOLD AIR POLLUTION

SMOKING

HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE

DIETARY RISKS

Air pollution

Undernutrition

Alcohol & drug useSmoking Physiological risks

Dietary risksOccupational risksPhysical inactivity

figure 15: Global shifts in rankings of dalys for top 15 risk factors, 1990-2010

Slow progress in reducing iron deficiency helps explain why iron-deficiency anemia ranks as the third-leading cause of disability globally.

As most risk factors for communicable diseases in children have declined, many risks associated with non-communicable diseases have grown. As the leading global risk factor for DALYs in 2010, dietary risks increased 30% between 1990 and 2010. Dietary risks include components such as high sodium intake and lack of fruit, nuts and seeds, and whole grains. GBD found the diseases linked to poor diets are primarily cardiovascular diseases as well as cancer and diabetes. While the focus of many public health messages about diet have stressed the importance of eating less saturated fat, GBD 2010’s findings indicate that these messages should emphasize a broader range of dietary components.

Note: The leading 15 risk factors are ranked from top to bottom in order of the number of DALYs they con-tributed in 2010. Bars to the right of the vertical line show the percent by which DALYs attributable to differ-ent risk factors have increased since 1990. Bars on the left show the percent by which DALYs attributable to different risk factors have decreased. Attributable DALYs were not quantified for physical inactivity for 1990.

Page 38: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

36 | GBD 2010

GBD 2010 used the most recent data available on the effects of different dietary risk factors. It is important to note that these data are constantly evolving as new studies on diet are conducted. Compared to data on the negative health impacts of smoking, which have been well understood for decades, the scientific evidence surrounding dietary risk factors is much newer. Future updates of GBD will incorporate new data on risk factors as they emerge.

The second-leading global risk factor, high blood pressure, increased by 27% as a cause of DALYs between 1990 and 2010. High blood pressure is a major risk fac-tor for cardiovascular and circulatory diseases. DALYs attributable to another risk factor for non-communicable diseases, tobacco smoking, increased slightly by 3% between 1990 and 2010. Smoking increases the risk of chronic respiratory diseases, cardiovascular and circulatory diseases, and cancer. DALYs attributable to another substance, alcohol use, increased 32% during this period. Alcohol use contributes to cardiovascular and circulatory diseases, cirrhosis, and cancer. In addition to being a contributor to non-communicable diseases, alcohol increases the risk of injuries.

High BMI was another major contributor to DALYs in 2010 and was the sixth-leading risk factor. High BMI is typically used as an indicator of overweight and obesity. It increased by a dramatic 82% over the period 1990 to 2010. High BMI is a leading risk factor for cardiovascular and circulatory diseases as well as diabetes. It is striking that high BMI was a more important cause of poor health worldwide than childhood underweight in 2010, whereas childhood underweight was a much more prominent risk factor than high BMI in 1990.

Figure 16 shows changes in leading risk factors for East Asia and Pacific. Similar to global trends, many risk factors for communicable diseases declined between 1990 and 2010, but decreases were even more dramatic in the East Asia and Pacific region. However, in comparison to the world overall, premature death and disability attributable to risk factors for non-communicable diseases such as dietary risks, high blood pressure, smoking, and high BMI increased by greater amounts in this region. For example, DALYs attributable to high BMI increased 82% globally from 1990 to 2010, but rose by 198% in East Asia and Pacific. Ambient PM air pollution was a more important cause of premature death and disability (fifth) in the region than it was in the world as a whole (ninth), largely due to China’s high levels of this risk fac-tor. Increases in DALYs attributable to drug use between 1990 and 2010 were lower in the region than global increases.

Global and regional rankings of risk factors mask important differences across coun-tries. Figure 17 shows substantial variation in leading risk factors for DALYs in select East Asia and Pacific countries in 2010. Dietary risks were the leading risk factors in most Southeast Asian countries, but high BMI dominated in many Pacific nations. High fasting plasma glucose also ranked high in the Pacific nations shown in Figure 17. Smoking ranked second or third in Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myan-mar, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, Thailand, Timor-Leste, and Vietnam.

Page 39: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

37 | GBD 2010

Stark contrasts existed between risk factors in upper-middle-income countries such as Malaysia and Thailand, where risk factors for non-communicable diseases con-stituted most of the top 10 risk factors, and low- and lower-middle-income countries including Cambodia, Laos, and Timor-Leste, where many more risks associated with childhood illness appeared among the top 10 risk factors. Household air pollution was the second-leading risk factor attributable to DALYs in Cambodia and Timor-Leste, and ranked first in Laos. Childhood underweight was the number one cause of premature death and disability in Timor-Leste, and was the fifth-leading cause in Cambodia and Laos. Suboptimal breastfeeding and iron deficiency were other risk factors that ranked among the top 10 in these low- and lower-middle-income countries. In Malaysia and Thailand, many non-communicable disease risks such as dietary risks, smoking, high BMI, high blood pressure, and high fasting plasma glucose were the dominant causes of DALYs.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

% change in total DALYs, 1990-2010

-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE

SUBOPTIMAL BREASTFEEDING

DRUG USE

IRON DEFICIENCY

HIGH TOTAL CHOLESTEROL

PHYSICAL INACTIVITY

OCCUPATIONAL RISKS

HIGH BODY MASS INDEX

ALCOHOL USE

HIGH FASTING PLASMA GLUCOSE

AMBIENT PM POLLUTION

HOUSEHOLD AIR POLLUTION

SMOKING

HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE

DIETARY RISKS

Air pollution

Undernutrition

Alcohol & drug useSmoking Physiological risks

Dietary risksOccupational risksPhysical inactivity

Sexual abuse & violence

figure 16: shifts in rankings of dalys in east asia and Pacific for top 15 risk factors, 1990-2010

Note: The leading 15 risk factors are ranked from top to bottom in order of the number of DALYs they contributed in 2010. Bars to the right of the vertical line show the percent by which DALYs attributable to dif-ferent risk factors have increased since 1990. Bars on the left show the percent by which DALYs attributable to different risk factors have decreased. Attributable DALYs were not quantified for physical inactivity and intimate partner violence for 1990.

Page 40: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

38 | GBD 2010

DIE

TA

RY

RIS

KS

HIG

H B

LOO

D P

RE

SS

UR

E

SM

OK

ING

HO

US

EH

OLD

AIR

PO

LLU

TIO

N

ALC

OH

OL

US

E

HIG

H B

OD

Y M

AS

S IN

DE

X

HIG

H F

AS

TIN

G P

LAS

MA

GLU

CO

SE

CH

ILD

HO

OD

UN

DE

RW

EIG

HT

AM

BIE

NT

PM

PO

LLU

TIO

N

PH

YS

ICA

L IN

AC

TIV

ITY

OC

CU

PA

TIO

NA

L R

ISK

S

IRO

N D

EFI

CIE

NC

Y

SU

BO

PT

IMA

L B

RE

AS

TFE

ED

ING

HIG

H T

OT

AL

CH

OLE

ST

ER

OL

DR

UG

US

E

INT

IMA

TE

PA

RT

NE

R V

IOLE

NC

E

LEA

D

SA

NIT

AT

ION

VIT

AM

IN A

DE

FIC

IEN

CY

ZIN

C D

EFI

CIE

NC

Y

CH

ILD

HO

OD

SE

XU

AL

AB

US

E

UN

IMP

RO

VE

D W

AT

ER

LOW

BO

NE

MIN

ER

AL

DE

NS

ITY

OZ

ON

E

RA

DO

N

GLOBAL

VANUATU

TONGA

SOLOMAN ISLANDS

SAMOA

PAPUA NEW GUINEA

FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA

MARSHALL ISLANDS

KIRIBATI

FIJI

VIETNAM

TIMOR-LESTE

THAILAND

PHILIPPINES

MYANMAR

MALAYSIA

LAOS

INDONESIA

CAMBODIA

1-5

6-10

11-1

516

-20

21-2

5

1 34 5 67 89 11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

242 10

25

1 2 3 4 5 6 78 910

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

123 4 56 78 910

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

1 2 3 4 5 6 78 9 10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

1 2 34 5 6 78 910

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

1 23 4 5 67 89 10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

1 2 34 56 78 910

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

123 45 6 789 10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

1 23 4 5 678 910

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

12 34 5 67 8910

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

123 45 67 8 9 10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

1 23 4 56 7 8 910

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

1 23 4 5 678 910

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

12 3 45 67 89 10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

1 23 4 5 67 8 910

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

123 45 6 7 89 10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

1 23 4 5 678 910

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

1 23 456 7 89 10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

figure 17: rankings of dalys attributable to leading risk factors across select countries in east asia and Pacific, 2010

Note: In this figure, shading is used to indicate the ranking of each risk factor in a particular country. To view an interactive version of this figure, visit IHME’s website: http://ihmeuw.org/gbdheatmap.

Page 41: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

39 | GBD 2010

In addition to allowing users to explore how different risk factors rank across coun-tries, decision-makers can use GBD visualization tools to understand how many DALYs could potentially be averted by addressing different risk factors. Figure 18 shows the number of DALYs attributable to outdoor air pollution, also known as ambient PM air pollution, that contributed to different diseases in China. The per-centage of DALYs that could be averted by reducing this risk factor is shown in dark shading.

The figure indicates how reducing exposure to air pollution could prevent large amounts of premature death and disability from ischemic heart disease and stroke, as indicated by the portion of these causes that are shaded in dark blue. Lower lev-els of air pollution could also reduce DALYs from lung cancer and COPD.

Figure 19 shows how, in Vietnam, many DALYs could be averted by eliminating tobacco smoking, including second-hand smoke. Most DALYs from COPD and lung cancer were caused by tobacco smoking and second-hand smoke, as indicated by the dark blue portion of the boxes representing these causes. Substantial numbers of healthy years lost from ischemic heart disease, stroke, and liver cancer could also be prevented by reducing exposure to these risk factors.

Figure 20 shows the number of DALYs attributable to childhood underweight in children from 1 month to 11 months old in Timor-Leste. This figure can be used to understand the number of years of healthy life that could potentially be gained by ensuring that all children in this age group in Timor-Leste are a healthy weight. Chil-dren of healthy weight is defined as a population of children that matches the 2006 World Health Organization Child Growth Standards reference. 65% of the DALYs attributable to diarrhea and 100% of DALYs attributable to protein-energy malnutri-tion could also potentially be prevented in this age group, as indicated by the dark shading in the boxes representing these causes. Ensuring more children achieve a healthy weight would also greatly reduce illness from lower respiratory infections.

Page 42: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

40 | GBD 2010

Communicable, newborn, nutritional, and maternal

Non-communicableInjuries

Communicable, newborn, nutritional, and maternal

Non-communicableInjuries

DALYs attributable to risk factor

DALYs not attributable to risk factor

UNIPOLAR

DEPRESSIVE

DISORDERS

LOW BACK + NECK PAIN

DIABETESGYNECOL DIS

URINARY

LEUKEMIA

BR

EA

ST

CA

NC

ER

ESOPHAGUS

CANCER

OTH CIRC

HTN HEA

ANXIETY SCHIZO

OTHER

MUSCULOSKELETAL

OTHER RESP

SENSEORGANDISEASES

ORAL COND

LIVER

CANCER

MIGRAINE

STOMACHCANCER

COLORECTALCANCER

ALZH

OSTEO

BIP

OLA

R

CO

NG

EN

ITAL

SK

IN D

ISE

AS

ES

DRUGS

ALCOHOL

CH

RO

NIC

OB

ST

RU

CT

IVE

PU

LMO

NA

RY

DIS

EA

SE

ISCHEMIC

HEART

DISEASE

STROKE

LUN

G C

AN

CE

R

FALL DROWNING ROAD INJURY SELF-HARM

OTH UNINTET

PO

ISO

N

LOW

ER

RE

SP

IRA

TO

RY

INFE

CT

ION

S

IRO

N

NE

ON

ATA

L EN

CE

PH

ALO

PAT

HY

PR

ET

ER

MH

IV/A

IDS

TU

BE

RC

ULO

SIS

OT

H N

EO

CHRONICKIDNEY

figure 18: dalys attributable to ambient particulate matter air pollution, both sexes, all ages, china, 2010

Note: The size of each box represents the percentage of total DALYs caused by a particular disease or injury, and the proportion of each cause attributable to the risk factor is shaded. To view an interactive version of this figure, visit IHME’s website: http://ihmeuw.org/gbdcompare.

Page 43: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

41 | GBD 2010

FALLS

FIRE

DR

OW

N

MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER

OT

H U

NIN

TE

NT

ROAD INJURY

ISC

HE

MIC

HE

AR

T D

ISE

AS

E

STROKE

LOWER RESPIRATORY INFECTIONS

LIVERCANCER

LOW BACK PAIN

CONGENITAL ANOMALIES

NECK PAINLU

NG

CA

NC

ER

DIA

RR

HE

A

PR

ET

ER

M

BIR

TH

C

OM

PLIC

AT

ION

S

NE

ON

AT

AL

EN

CE

PH

ALO

PA

TH

Y

ALCOHOL

SCHIZOPHRENIA

BIPOLAR

CERVIX

PANCREAS

BRAIN

TYPHOID

OTH NEO

IRO

N‐

DE

FICIE

NC

Y

AN

EM

IA

PEM

HOOKWORM

ASCARIASIS

MEASLES

LYMPHOMA

AFIB

CO

LOR

EC

TA

LC

AN

CE

R

AU

TIS

M

MO

UT

H

OT

ITIS

OT

H

INF

ME

NIN

GIT

IS

NA

SO

OT

H R

ES

P

BREAST LEUKEMIA

ME

CH

FOR

CE S

ELF-

HA

RM

VIO

LEN

CE

STOMACH

DYSTHYMIA

HIV

TU

BE

RC

ULO

SIS

MA

LAR

IA

ANXIETY DRUGS

OTH CIRC CMP

BPH

IBD

PMS

PU

D

THALASS

HTN HEART

HEARING

ED

EN

T

DIA

BE

TE

SM

IGR

AIN

E

EP

ILEP

SY

OT

H E

ND

O

OSTEO ASTHMA

CIR

RH

OS

IS

OT

H M

US

CU

LO

PC

O

OTHNEURO

ALZ

H

EC

ZE

MA

AC

NE

CH

RO

NIC

O

BS

TR

UC

TIV

E

PU

LMO

NA

RY

D

ISE

AS

E

CH

RO

NIC

K

IDN

EY

D

ISE

AS

ES

Communicable, newborn, nutritional, and maternal

Non-communicableInjuries

Communicable, newborn, nutritional, and maternal

Non-communicableInjuries

DALYs attributable to risk factor

DALYs not attributable to risk factor

figure 19: dalys attributable to tobacco smoking and second-hand smoke, both sexes, all ages, vietnam, 2010

Note: The size of each box represents the percentage of total DALYs caused by a particular disease or injury, and the proportion of each cause attributable to the risk factor is shaded. To view an interactive version of this figure, visit IHME’s website: http://ihmeuw.org/gbdcompare.

Page 44: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

42 | GBD 2010

STROKE

MENINGITIS

MALARIA

MEASLESWHOOPING COUGH

OTHER UNINTENTIONAL INJURIES

CM

POTHER CARDIO & CIRCULATORY

PR

ET

ER

M B

IRT

H C

OM

PLIC

AT

ION

S

EN

CE

PH

OT

HE

R N

EO

NA

TA

L DIS

OR

DE

RS

CO

PD

OT

HE

R C

HR

ON

IC R

ES

PIR

AT

OR

Y D

ISE

AS

ES

CO

NG

EN

ITA

L AN

OM

ALIE

S

ROAD INJ

OTHER INFECTIOUS DISEASES SYPHILIS

PROTEIN‐ENERGY MALNUTRITION

ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE

LOWER RESPIRATORY INFECTIONS

DIARRHEA

Communicable, newborn, nutritional, and maternal

Non-communicableInjuries

Communicable, newborn, nutritional, and maternal

Non-communicableInjuries

DALYs attributable to risk factor

DALYs not attributable to risk factor

figure 20: dalys attributable to child underweight, both sexes, ages 1-11 months, Timor-leste, 2010

Note: The size of each box represents the percentage of total DALYs caused by a particular disease or injury, and the proportion of each cause attributable to the risk factor is shaded. To view an interactive version of this figure, visit IHME’s website: http://ihmeuw.org/gbdcompare.

Page 45: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

43 | GBD 2010

USING GBD TO ASSESS COUNTRIES’ HEALTH PROGRESS

GBD found that factors such as population growth, longer lives, and decreasing mortality are driving up the years of healthy life lost, or DALYs, from non-commu-nicable diseases in many countries. Although non-communicable diseases are in-creasing relative to other health problems as a result of these demographic changes, GBD found that many countries are actually showing improvements in health as measured by age-standardized DALY rates.

Differences in population growth and ages across countries can make a country with a younger population appear better in terms of health performance than a coun-try with an older population. Similarly, countries with low population growth will add less disease burden over time than countries with a fast-growing population. Researchers can remove the impact of these factors to isolate what is important for comparisons of health performance using age-standardized rates of DALYs and YLLs, or years of life lost.

For example, many countries in the East Asia and Pacific region have made steady progress in reducing age-standardized DALY rates from lower respiratory infec-tions, tuberculosis, neonatal disorders such as preterm birth complications and neonatal encephalopathy, and diarrheal diseases. Countries including China and Vietnam made progress in reducing age-standardized rates of non-communicable diseases including stroke and cirrhosis, and age-standardized rates of cervical cancer dropped in Thailand between 2000 and 2005. However, rates of ischemic heart disease and lung cancer rose in many countries in the region. Most countries in the region made little or no progress in causes such as low back pain and depres-sion. To explore age-standardized rates of diseases and injuries at the country level between 1990 and 2010, visit IHME’s data visualization tools at www.ihmeuw.org/GBDcountryviz.

GBD can be used to compare and contrast disease patterns across countries. Figure 21 shows causes of age-standardized DALYs per 100,000 people. Many countries in East Asia and Pacific had rates of DALYs from communicable, newborn, nutritional, and maternal conditions that were lower than all countries of the world as a whole. Low- and lower-middle-income countries including Cambodia, Indone-sia, Laos, Myanmar, Papua New Guinea, Timor-Leste, and Vanuatu had the highest age-standardized rates of communicable, newborn, nutritional, and maternal condi-tions of all the countries shown in Figure 21. Fiji, the Federated States of Micronesia, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Tonga, and Vanuatu stood out as countries with high age-standardized rates of diabetes, urogenital, blood, and endocrine disorders, while Cambodia, Fiji, and Mongolia had elevated levels of cardiac and circulatory diseases. Compared to other countries shown in Figure 21, upper-middle-income countries such as China, Malaysia, and Thailand and lower-middle-income Vietnam had age-standardized rates of total DALYs that were closer to rates seen in devel-oped countries.

Page 46: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

44 | GBD 2010

Other communicableNutritional deficienciesNeonatal disordersMaternal disordersNTD & malariaDiarrhea/LRI/other infectiousHIV/AIDS & tuberculosis

War & disasterIntentional injuriesUnintentional injuriesTransport injuriesOther non-communicableMusculoskeletal disordersDiabetes/urogen/blood/endo

Mental & behavioral disordersNeurological disordersDigestive diseasesCirrhosisChronic respiratory diseasesCardio & circulatory diseasesCancer

DA

LYs

(per

100

,000

)

60k

55k

50k

45k

40k

35k

30k

25k

20k

15k

10k

5.0k

0.0

PA

PU

A N

EW

GU

INE

A

MY

AN

MA

R

VA

NU

AT

U

LAO

S

MO

NG

OLI

A

FED

ER

AT

ED

ST

AT

ES

OF

MIC

RO

NE

SIA

CA

MB

OD

IA

FIJI

TIM

OR

-LE

ST

E

GLO

BA

L

PH

ILIP

PIN

ES

IND

ON

ES

IA

TO

NG

A

SA

MO

A

NO

RT

H K

OR

EA

TH

AIL

AN

D

MA

LAY

SIA

VIE

TN

AM

CH

INA

DE

VE

LOP

ED

figure 21: age-standardized daly rates across select countries in east asia and Pacific, 2010

Note: The size of the colored portion in each bar represents the number of age-standardized DALYs per 100,000 people attributable to each cause. The causes are aggregated. For example, musculoskeletal disor-ders include low back pain and neck pain. To view an interactive version of this figure, visit IHME’s website: http://ihmeuw.org/gbdcausepattern.

Page 47: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

45 | GBD 2010

The GBD approach affords countries a unique opportunity to explore their success in improving health outcomes over time. GBD can also be used to better understand how fast a country’s health is improving relative to similar countries. This type of progress assessment is called benchmarking. Benchmarking is a tool that can help countries put their health achievements in context and identify areas for improve-ment. IHME invites countries interested in collaborating on benchmarking exercises to contact us.

As an example of a benchmarking exercise, Figure 22 ranks levels of premature mortality or years of life lost in East Asia and Pacific countries in 2010. The columns are arranged by the top 30 causes of years of life lost in the region. The countries are ordered according to levels of premature mortality. For each cause, rankings are color-coded to reflect each country’s level of age-standardized years of life lost rela-tive to the others. The best performers for each cause are in green while the worst performers for each cause appear in red. Yellow shading indicates that the ranking for a particular country is not statistically significant from the regional average. Black indicates no ranking was assigned due to zero YLLs from a given cause.

Figure 22 can be used to compare the performance of East Asia and Pacific countries and can help countries identify priority areas for improvement. For example, Malay-sia performed better than the regional average for most causes of premature death, but performed poorly in areas such as ischemic heart disease, HIV/AIDS, and other cardiovascular and circulatory diseases. Thailand was a top performer in the region for causes including stroke, stomach cancer, neonatal encephalopathy, and falls, but ranked near the bottom for road injury, lung cancer, liver cancer, HIV/AIDS, drown-ing, and interpersonal violence. Country comparisons can be used for selecting case studies to understand why performance differs across countries. For example, case studies could potentially reveal why Vietnam performed much better than most of its lower-income counterparts in many disease areas.

To further illustrate how benchmarking can be implemented at the country level, IHME is currently working with public health experts in the UK to explore changes in population health over time and to compare its health performance to other coun-tries with similar and higher levels of health spending. Through close collaboration with decision-makers at the National Health Service and Public Health England, the IHME-UK benchmarking project is examining the context in which health progress has occurred, such as the UK’s provision of universal health coverage and its imple-mentation of numerous public health interventions.

For the UK, GBD estimates of life expectancy and healthy life expectancy (HALE), years lost due to premature death (YLLs), years lived with disability (YLDs), and healthy years lost (DALYs) will provide a detailed and comprehensive picture of changes in health outcomes over time. Comparing GBD estimates across countries will elucidate areas of health where the UK performs both better and worse than its peers. In addition, analysis of potentially modifiable risk factors can shed light on ways that public health policy could address major causes of ill health and prema-ture death. The IHME-UK benchmarking study aims to identify key opportunities to speed up the pace of health improvements in the nation.

Page 48: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

46 | GBD 2010

CH

INA

VIE

TN

AM

MA

LAY

SIA

TH

AIL

AN

D

SA

MO

A

NO

RT

H K

OR

EA

TO

NG

A

PH

ILIP

PIN

ES

IND

ON

ES

IA

TIM

OR

-LE

ST

E

FIJI

CA

MB

OD

IA

FED

ER

AT

ED

ST

AT

ES

O

F M

ICR

ON

ES

IA

MO

NG

OLI

A

VA

NU

AT

U

LAO

S

MY

AN

MA

R

MA

RS

HA

LL IS

LAN

DS

SO

LOM

AN

ISLA

ND

S

KIR

IBA

TI

PA

PU

A N

EW

GU

INE

A

MALARIA

RHEUMATIC HEART DISEASE

BREAST CANCER

TYPHOID FEVERS

INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE

LEUKEMIA

OTHER CARDIO & CIRCULATORY

FALLS

ESOPHAGEAL CANCER

COLORECTAL CANCER

HYPERTENSIVE HEART DISEASE

CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE

DIARRHEAL DISEASES

DROWNING

HIV/AIDS

NEONATAL ENCEPHALOPATHY

CONGENITAL ANOMALIES

CIRRHOSIS

PRETERM BIRTH COMPLICATIONS

DIABETES

STOMACH CANCER

SELF-HARM

TUBERCULOSIS

LIVER CANCER

LOWER RESPIRATORY INFECTIONS

LUNG CANCER

COPD

ROAD INJURY

ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE

STROKE

Low

er t

han

mea

n (

95%

co

nfi

den

ce)

In

dis

tin

gu

ish

able

fro

m m

ean

(95

% c

on

fid

ence

)

Hig

her

th

an m

ean

(95

% c

on

fid

ence

)

No

ran

kin

g a

ssig

ned

83

16

19

20

11

51

91

82

22

98

11

71

17

17

20

17

21

22

11

55

9

61

13

31

82

17

74

15

48

87

31

72

05

23

10

61

13

14

13

33

13

51

39

11

14

62

21

35

11

31

18

42

35

13

41

51

64

31

79

11

0

24

20

41

75

18

61

61

65

58

22

02

13

54

15

51

75

19

19

69

12

42

25

17

14

64

14

46

15

37

13

23

16

63

13

62

4

13

81

02

12

18

19

82

11

63

91

01

87

10

19

44

14

21

19

20

11

35

12

11

10

8

19

52

23

11

58

81

36

11

10

62

81

51

63

24

91

42

72

91

74

71

61

47

16

32

11

16

71

59

85

91

22

11

12

95

11

21

20

14

71

1

17

52

18

15

43

21

25

12

14

14

61

91

51

17

91

69

97

19

10

12

11

38

15

10

11

39

61

65

15

51

27

19

32

01

69

19

71

51

11

31

82

61

44

14

19

72

01

13

94

37

10

18

17

41

41

31

26

10

10

64

85

81

57

32

11

5

12

19

14

12

11

17

61

41

09

82

19

17

18

16

14

13

62

07

15

10

21

88

18

10

17

17

15

12

71

04

10

10

10

18

14

16

31

62

41

11

11

79

18

12

13

10

16

95

17

12

21

21

19

16

19

18

21

11

13

21

11

52

11

62

19

15

61

61

92

21

49

18

15

11

21

18

15

12

13

51

28

13

17

17

15

12

15

11

14

10

14

11

10

14

13

12

13

20

10

91

51

61

4

14

18

17

15

10

20

91

71

11

19

20

12

21

17

14

16

20

81

75

14

16

20

71

61

58

19

16

16

61

82

01

31

91

22

01

46

10

18

19

19

20

21

18

21

14

18

81

02

11

76

20

16

12

13

21

11

14

66

71

11

49

12

72

11

31

31

21

28

12

20

11

20

78

12

14

17

41

86

20

16

81

78

15

13

18

19

19

19

10

17

41

01

31

61

81

21

61

61

41

41

91

27

19

20

18

19

10

15

14

12

13

16

12

20

13

20

71

85

15

13

17

15

19

81

91

71

91

51

71

81

01

61

1

37

11

18

92

12

01

91

52

01

71

12

01

31

11

91

21

82

11

31

21

81

81

12

11

18

20

18

20

figure 22: causes of leading years of life lost, east asia and Pacific countries relative to regional average, 2010

Note: The columns are ordered by the absolute number of YLLs for that particular year. The numbers indicate the rank across countries for each cause in terms of age-standardized YLL rates, with 1 as the best performance and 21 as the worst.

Page 49: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

47 | GBD 2010

CONCLUSION

The Global Burden of Disease provides detailed data on diseases, injuries, and risk factors that are essential inputs for evidence-based policymaking. This collaborative project shows that the world’s health is undergoing rapid change.

The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2010 (GBD 2010) identified major trends in global health that can be summarized by the three Ds: demographics, disease, and disability. As most countries have made great strides in reducing child mortality, people are living longer and the population is growing older. These demographic changes are driving up premature deaths and disabil-ity, or DALYs, from non-communicable diseases. Health problems are increasingly defined not by what kills us, but what ails us. In 1990, childhood underweight was the leading risk factor for ill health, but high body mass index surpassed it in 2010 as a more important cause of premature death and disability. This finding illustrates global shifts away from risk factors for communicable disease in children toward risk factors for non-communicable diseases.

GBD 2010 found that non-communicable diseases and disability caused a greater share of health loss in 2010 compared to 1990 in most regions of the world. At the same time, the study revealed that the leading causes of DALYs in sub-Saharan Africa have changed little over the past 20 years. Still, GBD 2010 provides evidence of encouraging progress in this region, such as reductions in mortality from malaria, HIV/AIDS, and maternal conditions.

In East Asia and Pacific, GBD 2010 documented important regional trends that reveal increasing disease burden due to non-communicable diseases and injuries. The bur-den of non-communicable diseases such as stroke; ischemic heart disease; low back pain; trachea, bronchus, and lung cancers; and diabetes grew in these countries between 1990 and 2010. Road injuries were the third-leading cause of premature death and disability in the region. Removing the effects of demographic changes by using age-standardized rates to measure health progress in the region shows that countries including China and Vietnam have reduced rates of non-communicable diseases such as stroke and cirrhosis, but ischemic heart disease and lung cancer remained problem areas in many countries.

Risk factors such as dietary risks, high blood pressure, smoking, household and ambient particulate matter air pollution, high fasting plasma glucose, and high BMI have become important threats to public health in many countries in East Asia and Pacific. At the same time, risk factors related to illness in children persist in certain countries such as Cambodia, Laos, and Timor-Leste.

Page 50: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

48 | GBD 2010

While GBD 2010 provides key information about health trends at global and regional levels, its tools also allow users to view data specific to 187 countries. Similar to the ways in which governments use financial data to monitor economic trends and make necessary adjustments to ensure continued growth, decision-makers can use GBD data to inform health policy. Continual updates of GBD will incorporate the most recent data on disease patterns as well as the latest science about the effects of different risk factors on health.

Future updates of GBD will be enriched by widening the network of collaborators. Expanded collaboration between researchers, staff of ministries of health, and IHME on national and subnational burden of disease studies will ensure that GBD tools are used to understand causes of premature death and disability at the community level. Despite similarities of epidemiological trends in most regions, GBD illustrates the unique patterns of diseases, injuries, and risk factors that exist in different coun-tries. Local epidemiological assessment is crucial for informing local priorities. The GBD approach to health measurement can help guide the design of public health interventions to ensure they are tailored to countries’ specific needs.

IHME is seeking partners interested in conducting in-depth studies of the burden of disease in countries. Through such partnerships, IHME is helping governments and donors gain insights into localized health trends to inform planning and policymak-ing. IHME is committed to building capacity for GBD analysis in countries around the world, and will be conducting a variety of training workshops. Information on these trainings can be found at http://www.healthmetricsandevaluation.org/gbd/training.

GBD data visualization tools can display regional and national data from burden of disease studies. These user-friendly tools are helpful for planning, presentations, and educational purposes. Also, IHME has designed a variety of data visualization tools to compare trends between various raw data sources at the national level. By visualizing all available data, ministry of health officials and researchers can quickly identify unexpected trends in the data that they may wish to flag for further investi-gation.

Currently, IHME is working to expand GBD to track expenditure for particular dis-eases and injuries. Also, IHME is estimating utilization of outpatient and inpatient facilities and other health services for specific diseases and injuries. Side-to-side comparisons of these estimates to the number of DALYs from myriad causes will allow decision-makers to evaluate health system priorities. Data on disease-specific expenditure and disease burden are essential for policymakers facing difficult deci-sions about how to allocate limited resources.

Page 51: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

49 | GBD 2010

METHODS

The analytical strategy of GBD

The GBD approach contains 18 distinct components, as outlined in Figure A1. The components of GBD are interconnected. For example, when new data is incorpo-rated into the age-specific mortality rates analysis (component 2), other dependent components must also be updated, such as rescaling deaths for each cause (compo-nent 5); healthy life expectancy, or HALE (component 12); years of life lost, or YLLs (component 13); and estimation of YLLs attributable to each risk factor (component 18). The inner workings of key components are briefly described in this publication, and more detailed descriptions of each component are included in the published articles.

Estimating age- and sex-specific mortality

Researchers identified sources of under-5 and adult mortality data from vital and sample registration systems as well as from surveys that ask mothers about live births and deaths of their children and ask people about siblings and their survival. Researchers processed that data to address biases and estimated the probability of death between ages 0 and 5 and ages 15 and 60 using statistical models. Finally, researchers used these probability estimates as well as a model life table system to estimate age-specific mortality rates by sex between 1970 and 2010.

ANNEx

Covariate databaseAge-specificmortality rates

Cause of deathdatabase

DALY’s attributableto conditions andinjuries

YLLs

YLDs

1 2 3

Estimating causesof death

4

Rescaling deaths toequal all-cause mortality

Estimating diseasesequale prevalence,incidence, duration

Comorbidity simulation

Disease sequelaeepidemiology database

Cross-validation ofimpairment levels

Nature and externalcauses of injury analysis

YLLs attributableto each risk

Risk factor exposuredatabase

Estimating prevalenceof risk factor exposure

Estimating relative risksfor risk-disease pairs

Theoretical minimumrisk exposure

YLDs attributableto each risk

DALY’sattributableto risk factors

Disability weights

5

Healthy lifeexpectancy

12

6

8

9

11

10

13

1816

17

15

14

7

figure a1: The 18 components of Gbd and their interrelations

Page 52: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

50 | GBD 2010

Estimating years lost due to premature death

Researchers compiled all available data on causes of death from 187 countries. Information about causes of death was derived from vital registration systems, mortality surveillance systems, censuses, surveys, hospital records, police records, mortuaries, and verbal autopsies. Verbal autopsies are surveys that collect informa-tion from individuals familiar with the deceased about the signs and symptoms the person had prior to death. GBD 2010 researchers closely examined the complete-ness of the data. For those countries where cause of death data were incomplete, researchers used statistical techniques to compensate for the inherent biases. They also standardized causes of death across different data sources by mapping differ-ent versions of the International Classification of Diseases coding system to the GBD cause list.

Next, researchers examined the accuracy of the data, scouring rows and rows of data for “garbage codes.” Garbage codes are misclassifications of death in the data, and researchers identified thousands of them. Some garbage codes are instances where we know the cause listed cannot possibly lead to death. Examples found in records include “abdominal rigidity,” “senility,” and “yellow nail syndrome.” To correct these, researchers drew on evidence from medical literature, expert judg-ment, and statistical techniques to reassign each of these to more probable causes of death.

figure a2: leading causes of death and premature death in east asia and Pacific, 2010

0 5 10 15 20

Cirrhosis

Hypertensive heart disease

Tuberculosis

Stomach cancer

Diabetes

Road injury

Lower respiratory infections

Liver cancer

Lung cancer

COPD

Ischemic heart disease

Stroke

DeathsYLLs

% total deaths or YLLs

Page 53: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

51 | GBD 2010

After addressing data-quality issues, researchers used a variety of statistical models to determine the number of deaths from each cause. This approach, named CODEm (for Cause of Death Ensemble modeling), was designed based on statistical tech-niques called “ensemble modeling.” Ensemble modeling was made famous by the recipients of the Netflix Prize in 2009, BellKor’s Pragmatic Chaos, who engineered the best algorithm to predict how much a person would like a film, taking into ac-count their movie preferences.

To ensure that the number of deaths from each cause does not exceed the total number of deaths estimated in a separate GBD demographic analysis, researchers apply a correction technique named CoDCorrect. This technique makes certain that estimates of the number of deaths from each cause do not add up to more than100% of deaths in a given year.

After producing estimates of the number of deaths from each of the 235 fatal outcomes included in the GBD cause list, researchers then calculated years of life lost to premature death, or YLLs. For every death from a particular cause, research-ers estimated the number of years lost based on the highest life expectancy in the deceased’s age group. For example, if a 20-year-old male died in a car accident in Cambodia in 2010, he has 66 years of life lost, that is, the highest remaining life expectancy in 20-year-olds, as experienced by 20-year-old females in Japan.

When comparing rankings of the leading causes of death versus YLLs, YLLs place more weight on the causes of death that occur in younger age groups, as shown in Figure A2. For example, road injury represents a greater percentage of total YLLs than total deaths since it is a leading killer of young men. Ischemic heart disease, by contrast, accounts for a smaller percentage of total YLLs than total deaths as it primarily kills older people.

Estimating years lived with disability

Researchers estimated the prevalence of each sequela using different sources of data, including government reports of cases of infectious diseases, data from population-based disease registries for conditions such as cancers and chronic kidney diseases, antenatal clinic data, hospital discharge data, data from outpatient facilities, interview questions, and direct measurements of hearing, vision, and lung function testing from surveys and other sources.

Confronted with the challenge of data gaps in many regions and for numerous types of sequelae, they developed a statistical modeling tool named DisMod-MR (for Disease Modeling – Metaregression) to estimate prevalence using available data on incidence, prevalence, remission, duration, and extra risk of mortality due to the disease.

Researchers estimated disability weights using data collected from almost 14,000 respondents via household surveys in Bangladesh, Indonesia, Peru, Tanzania, and the United States. Disability weights measure the severity of different sequelae that

Page 54: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

52 | GBD 2010

result from disease and injury. Data were also used from an Internet survey of more than 16,000 people. GBD researchers presented different lay definitions of sequelae grouped into 220 unique health states to survey respondents, and respondents were then asked to rate the severity of the different health states. The results were similar across all surveys despite cultural and socioeconomic differences. Respondents consistently placed health states such as mild hearing loss and long-term treated fractures at the low end of the severity scale, while they ranked acute schizophrenia and severe multiple sclerosis as very severe.

Finally, years lived with disability, or YLDs, are calculated as prevalence of a sequela multiplied by the disability weight for that sequela. The number of years lived with disability for a specific disease or injury are calculated as the sum of the YLDs from each sequela arising from that cause.

Estimating disability-adjusted life years

DALYs are calculated by adding together YLLs and YLDs. Figure A3 compares the 10 leading diseases and injuries calculated as percentages of both deaths and DALYs in East Asia and Pacific. This figure also shows the top 10 risk factors attributable to deaths and DALYs worldwide. It illustrates how a decision-maker looking only at the top 10 causes of death would fail to see the importance of low back pain and depression, for example, which were leading causes of DALYs in 2010. DALYs are a powerful tool for priority setting as they measure disease burden from non-fatal as well as fatal conditions.

Estimating DALYs attributable to risk factors

To estimate the number of healthy years lost, or DALYs, attributable to potentially avoidable risk factors, researchers collected detailed data on exposure to different risk factors. The study used data from sources such as satellite data on air pollu-tion, breastfeeding data from population surveys, and blood and bone lead levels from medical examination surveys and epidemiological surveys. Researchers then collected data on the effects of risk factors on disease outcomes through systematic reviews of epidemiological studies.

All risk factors analyzed met common criteria in four areas:

1. The likely importance of a risk factor for policymaking or disease burden.

2. Availability of sufficient data to estimate exposure to a particular risk factor.

3. Rigorous scientific evidence that specific risk factors cause certain diseases and injuries.

4. Scientific findings about the effects of different risk factors that are relevant for the general population.

Page 55: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

53 | GBD 2010

0 5 10 15 20 25 300

3

6

9

12

15

Deaths (%)

DALY

s (%

)

Stroke

Ischemic heart diseaseRoad injury

COPDLow back pain

Majordepressive

disorder Lung cancerLower respiratory infections

DiabetesLiver cancerTuberculosis

Stomach cancer

Dietary risks

High blood pressure

Tobacco smoking

Household air pollution from solid fuels

Ambient particulate matter pollutionHigh fasting plasma glucose

Alcohol useHigh body mass indexOccupational risks

Physical inactivity and low physical activity

High total cholesterol

Diseases and injuriesRisk factors

figure a3: The 10 leading diseases and injuries and 10 leading risk factors based on percentage of deaths and dalys in east asia and Pacific, 2010

Note: This figure compares the percent of DALYs and deaths attributable to different diseases and injuries (shown in blue) as well as risk factors (shown in red). Certain causes, such as low-back pain, cause substan-tial numbers of DALYs, but cause few deaths. DALYs are an important tool for decision-makers because they capture years of healthy life lost from both fatal and non-fatal causes.

To calculate the number of DALYs attributable to different risk factors, research-ers compared the disease burden in a group exposed to a risk factor to the disease burden in a group that had zero exposure to that risk factor. When subjects with zero exposure were impossible to find, as in the case of high blood pressure, for ex-ample, researchers established a level of minimum exposure that leads to the best health outcomes.

Page 56: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

54 | GBD 2010

Country Age-standardized death rate (per 100,000) Age-standardized YLL rate (per 100,000) Age-standardized YLD rate (per 100,000) Life expectancy at birth Health-adjusted life expectancy at birth

1990 2010 1990 2010 1990 2010 1990 2010 1990 2010

Rate Rank Rate Rank Rate Rank Rate Rank Rate Rank Rate Rank LE Rank LE Rank HALE Rank HALE Rank

Cambodia 1,355 (1,298-1,426)

14 (13-16)

957 (906-1,000)

11 (9-12)

47,844 (44,932-51,313)

17 (14-18)

28,770 (26,898-30,476)

12 (11-14)

14,501 (11,962-17,393)

18 (14-21)

12,603 (10,397-15,123)

15 (9-19)

59.2 (58.5-59.9)

17 (15-18)

67.5 (66.5-68.5)

11 (10-14)

50.0 (48.1-51.8)

17 (15-19)

58.0 (56.0-59.8)

10 (10-15)

China 896 (859-944)

5 (3-7)

607 (581-633)

2 (1-2)

24,989 (23,792-26,293)

4 (4-6)

14,024 (13,416-14,996)

1 (1-2)

9,639 (7,954-11,700)

1 (1-2)

8,782 (7,291-10,497)

1 (1-1)

69.3 (68.3-70.3)

4 (3-6)

75.7 (74.9-76.5)

1 (1-2)

61.7 (59.9-63.3)

3 (2-5)

67.8 (66.1-69.3)

1 (1-1)

Fiji 1,184 (1,044-1,291)

10 (9-13)

1,068 (988-1,112)

12 (12-14)

32,309 (27,799-35,689)

9 (8-10)

28,494 (25,708-30,188)

11 (10-13)

13,180 (10,848-16,091)

10 (7-18)

12,351 (10,104-14,980)

12 (7-18)

65.4 (63.0-67.6)

9 (7-13)

67.2 (65.7-68.4)

12 (10-15)

56.0 (53.4-58.6)

10 (7-12)

58.0 (55.6-59.9)

12 (10-15)

Indonesia 1,033 (1,005-1,062)

8 (8-9)

867 (831-903)

7 (5-10)

34,584 (33,009-36,082)

10 (9-12)

24,178 (23,026-25,502)

9 (7-9)

12,101 (9,909-14,596)

6 (4-10)

11,107 (9,122-13,402)

5 (3-10)

65.0 (64.5-65.5)

10 (8-12)

69.7 (68.5-70.9)

9 (6-11)

56.2 (54.4-57.8)

9 (8-11)

60.9 (59.0-62.7)

7 (5-9)

Kiribati 1,879 (1,713-2,011)

20 (18-21)

1,528 (1,272-1,954)

20 (18-21)

58,098 (51,979-62,930)

20 (17-21)

43,508 (35,532-58,322)

20 (18-21)

15,513 (12,565-18,794)

21 (18-21)

14,585 (12,011-17,599)

21 (18-21)

56.0 (53.0-58.8)

20 (17-21)

61.2 (56.3-65.3)

20 (15-21)

47.2 (44.5-49.8)

20 (17-21)

51.9 (47.8-55.8)

20 (17-21)

Laos 1,532 (1,235-1,967)

17 (11-21)

1,094 (915-1,345)

13 (10-18)

56,031 (45,954-70,719)

19 (15-21)

34,746 (28,598-43,683)

16 (13-20)

13,297 (10,942-15,971)

11 (8-17)

12,323 (10,175-14,872)

11 (7-17)

56.4 (50.6-61.1)

19 (14-21)

64.8 (59.0-69.8)

14 (8-21)

48.4 (43.6-52.5)

19 (14-21)

56.0 (51.0-60.5)

15 (10-20)

Malaysia 825 (817-831)

2 (2-3)

726 (714-735)

4 (4-4)

19,850 (19,533-20,190)

1 (1-2)

16,000 (15,721-16,270)

3 (2-3)

11,926 (9,901-14,286)

5 (3-9)

11,186 (9,322-13,427)

6 (3-10)

71.6 (71.5-71.6)

2 (2-3)

73.7 (73.5-73.9)

4 (3-4)

62.0 (60.2-63.7)

2 (2-4)

64.4 (62.5-66.0)

4 (3-4)

Marshall Islands 1,270 (1,204-1,340)

12 (11-15)

1,309 (1,134-1,507)

18 (15-19)

36,253 (33,971-38,609)

11 (10-12)

36,337 (30,584-43,200)

18 (14-19)

14,368 (11,695-17,264)

17 (12-21)

13,968 (11,409-16,775)

20 (16-21)

63.9 (62.3-65.5)

11 (9-13)

63.9 (60.6-66.9)

18 (13-20)

54.0 (51.7-56.2)

11 (10-14)

54.4 (51.2-57.1)

19 (14-20)

Federated States of Micronesia

1,476 (1,226-1,760)

15 (12-19)

1,258 (1,015-1,620)

16 (12-19)

42,732 (34,521-51,343)

13 (11-18)

31,526 (24,359-41,443)

13 (10-18)

13,632 (11,181-16,374)

16 (9-19)

12,681 (10,357-15,299)

17 (9-19)

61.4 (55.0-67.2)

13 (8-20)

66.0 (59.5-71.5)

13 (6-20)

52.5 (47.6-57.0)

14 (9-19)

56.9 (51.8-61.5)

13 (7-20)

Mongolia 1,283 (1,226-1,334)

13 (11-15)

1,218 (1,134-1,275)

15 (14-18)

44,720 (42,159-47,172)

14 (12-16)

34,325 (31,672-36,281)

15 (13-18)

11,523 (9,367-13,876)

4 (2-9)

11,482 (9,373-13,782)

7 (4-14)

60.5 (59.8-61.1)

15 (13-16)

64.6 (63.2-66.0)

17 (13-19)

52.8 (51.1-54.3)

13 (11-15)

56.5 (54.6-58.3)

14 (12-17)

Myanmar 1,640 (1,317-2,192)

18 (14-21)

1,185 (924-1,549)

14 (10-19)

55,134 (45,237-72,341)

18 (16-21)

36,251 (28,627-47,420)

17 (13-20)

13,542 (11,178-16,362)

15 (9-18)

11,974 (9,854-14,386)

10 (6-16)

56.8 (49.8-61.8)

18 (13-21)

64.2 (57.9-69.5)

16 (9-21)

48.7 (43.4-52.9)

18 (14-21)

55.8 (50.5-59.9)

16 (10-20)

North Korea 895 (806-996)

4 (2-7)

832 (769-898)

5 (5-10)

25,915 (21,408-31,689)

5 (3-8)

21,755 (19,020-24,828)

6 (5-9)

10,569 (8,572-13,047)

2 (1-4)

10,347 (8,372-12,618)

3 (2-6)

68.9 (63.8-72.2)

6 (1-11)

70.8 (68.2-72.9)

6 (5-10)

60.7 (55.8-64.1)

4 (1-9)

62.4 (59.7-64.8)

5 (4-8)

Papua New Guinea 1,990 (1,552-2,531)

21 (18-21)

1,700 (1,249-2,230)

21 (17-21)

64,195 (51,321-81,065)

21 (18-21)

49,553 (36,132-66,110)

21 (19-21)

14,891 (12,129-17,954)

20 (16-21)

13,793 (11,185-16,647)

19 (16-21)

54.3 (47.0-59.9)

21 (15-21)

59.2 (51.8-65.2)

21 (15-21)

46.1 (40.7-50.8)

21 (16-21)

50.8 (44.5-55.8)

21 (16-21)

Philippines 909 (889-928)

7 (4-7)

868 (839-894)

8 (6-10)

28,515 (27,455-29,543)

8 (6-8)

23,262 (22,258-24,190)

8 (6-9)

13,334 (11,117-16,042)

13 (9-17)

12,483 (10,313-15,012)

14 (9-17)

67.8 (67.5-68.1)

7 (6-8)

70.1 (69.2-71.0)

8 (5-10)

57.7 (55.6-59.4)

8 (6-9)

60.2 (58.1-62.0)

9 (7-10)

Samoa 1,088 (979-1,225)

9 (8-11)

863 (760-1,012)

6 (5-11)

28,245 (25,185-32,115)

7 (5-9)

21,441 (18,386-25,965)

5 (5-9)

12,397 (10,122-15,071)

8 (4-13)

11,587 (9,532-14,088)

8 (4-16)

67.3 (64.2-70.3)

8 (3-11)

70.8 (68.7-72.6)

5 (5-10)

58.0 (55.1-61.0)

7 (4-10)

61.4 (59.0-63.8)

6 (5-9)

Solomon Islands 1,707 (1,360-2,295)

19 (15-21)

1,510 (1,194-1,898)

19 (17-21)

47,851 (36,744-65,204)

16 (12-20)

40,489 (30,586-52,994)

19 (15-21)

13,520 (11,141-16,339)

14 (9-19)

12,482 (10,122-15,101)

13 (8-18)

59.8 (52.8-65.5)

16 (10-21)

62.3 (56.3-67.9)

19 (12-21)

51.5 (45.8-56.1)

15 (10-21)

54.2 (49.2-58.9)

18 (11-21)

Thailand 712 (694-734)

1 (1-1)

663 (629-689)

3 (3-3)

20,676 (19,744-21,829)

2 (2-3)

17,227 (16,358-18,065)

4 (4-4)

11,069 (9,071-13,228)

3 (2-5)

10,369 (8,591-12,324)

2 (2-5)

72.4 (71.6-73.2)

1 (1-2)

74.1 (73.1-75.3)

3 (2-4)

63.1 (61.1-64.8)

1 (1-2)

65.2 (63.3-66.9)

3 (2-4)

Timor-Leste 1,223 (1,141-1,330)

11 (10-14)

872 (829-932)

9 (5-10)

45,244 (41,396-49,626)

15 (12-17)

26,770 (25,276-28,562)

10 (9-12)

14,698 (12,107-17,655)

19 (14-21)

13,715 (11,212-16,588)

18 (15-21)

60.5 (59.2-61.6)

14 (12-17)

68.7 (67.6-69.8)

10 (8-12)

50.7 (48.6-52.7)

16 (14-18)

58.0 (55.7-60.1)

11 (10-15)

Tonga 914 (828-990)

6 (3-7)

882 (811-1,018)

10 (5-12)

22,822 (20,145-24,995)

3 (2-4)

22,195 (20,160-26,850)

7 (5-10)

12,546 (10,245-15,204)

9 (5-15)

11,940 (9,710-14,478)

9 (5-17)

70.1 (67.6-72.0)

3 (2-7)

70.5 (68.6-72.2)

7 (5-10)

60.1 (57.5-62.6)

5 (3-7)

60.9 (58.3-63.3)

8 (5-10)

Vanuatu 1,507 (1,239-1,830)

16 (12-19)

1,291 (1,051-1,587)

17 (13-19)

41,590 (33,925-51,437)

12 (10-17)

34,595 (27,270-42,984)

14 (12-19)

13,346 (10,934-16,107)

12 (8-18)

12,657 (10,303-15,379)

16 (8-19)

61.9 (54.2-67.7)

12 (7-20)

64.6 (58.7-69.6)

15 (9-21)

53.3 (47.2-57.9)

12 (8-19)

55.8 (51.0-60.1)

17 (10-20)

Vietnam 876 (832-931)

3 (3-7)

595 (530-636)

1 (1-2)

26,230 (24,565-28,008)

6 (4-7)

15,123 (13,425-16,427)

2 (1-3)

12,188 (10,027-14,672)

7 (4-10)

10,909 (9,038-13,075)

4 (2-8)

68.9 (67.9-69.9)

5 (3-7)

75.6 (74.1-77.2)

2 (1-3)

59.4 (57.4-61.3)

6 (4-7)

65.8 (63.5-67.8)

2 (2-4)

Table a1: age-standardized death rates, years of life lost, and years lived with disability, and life expectancy at birth and healthy life expectancy at birth for 1990 and 2010 for both sexes combined

Page 57: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

55 | GBD 2010

Country Age-standardized death rate (per 100,000) Age-standardized YLL rate (per 100,000) Age-standardized YLD rate (per 100,000) Life expectancy at birth Health-adjusted life expectancy at birth

1990 2010 1990 2010 1990 2010 1990 2010 1990 2010

Rate Rank Rate Rank Rate Rank Rate Rank Rate Rank Rate Rank LE Rank LE Rank HALE Rank HALE Rank

Cambodia 1,355 (1,298-1,426)

14 (13-16)

957 (906-1,000)

11 (9-12)

47,844 (44,932-51,313)

17 (14-18)

28,770 (26,898-30,476)

12 (11-14)

14,501 (11,962-17,393)

18 (14-21)

12,603 (10,397-15,123)

15 (9-19)

59.2 (58.5-59.9)

17 (15-18)

67.5 (66.5-68.5)

11 (10-14)

50.0 (48.1-51.8)

17 (15-19)

58.0 (56.0-59.8)

10 (10-15)

China 896 (859-944)

5 (3-7)

607 (581-633)

2 (1-2)

24,989 (23,792-26,293)

4 (4-6)

14,024 (13,416-14,996)

1 (1-2)

9,639 (7,954-11,700)

1 (1-2)

8,782 (7,291-10,497)

1 (1-1)

69.3 (68.3-70.3)

4 (3-6)

75.7 (74.9-76.5)

1 (1-2)

61.7 (59.9-63.3)

3 (2-5)

67.8 (66.1-69.3)

1 (1-1)

Fiji 1,184 (1,044-1,291)

10 (9-13)

1,068 (988-1,112)

12 (12-14)

32,309 (27,799-35,689)

9 (8-10)

28,494 (25,708-30,188)

11 (10-13)

13,180 (10,848-16,091)

10 (7-18)

12,351 (10,104-14,980)

12 (7-18)

65.4 (63.0-67.6)

9 (7-13)

67.2 (65.7-68.4)

12 (10-15)

56.0 (53.4-58.6)

10 (7-12)

58.0 (55.6-59.9)

12 (10-15)

Indonesia 1,033 (1,005-1,062)

8 (8-9)

867 (831-903)

7 (5-10)

34,584 (33,009-36,082)

10 (9-12)

24,178 (23,026-25,502)

9 (7-9)

12,101 (9,909-14,596)

6 (4-10)

11,107 (9,122-13,402)

5 (3-10)

65.0 (64.5-65.5)

10 (8-12)

69.7 (68.5-70.9)

9 (6-11)

56.2 (54.4-57.8)

9 (8-11)

60.9 (59.0-62.7)

7 (5-9)

Kiribati 1,879 (1,713-2,011)

20 (18-21)

1,528 (1,272-1,954)

20 (18-21)

58,098 (51,979-62,930)

20 (17-21)

43,508 (35,532-58,322)

20 (18-21)

15,513 (12,565-18,794)

21 (18-21)

14,585 (12,011-17,599)

21 (18-21)

56.0 (53.0-58.8)

20 (17-21)

61.2 (56.3-65.3)

20 (15-21)

47.2 (44.5-49.8)

20 (17-21)

51.9 (47.8-55.8)

20 (17-21)

Laos 1,532 (1,235-1,967)

17 (11-21)

1,094 (915-1,345)

13 (10-18)

56,031 (45,954-70,719)

19 (15-21)

34,746 (28,598-43,683)

16 (13-20)

13,297 (10,942-15,971)

11 (8-17)

12,323 (10,175-14,872)

11 (7-17)

56.4 (50.6-61.1)

19 (14-21)

64.8 (59.0-69.8)

14 (8-21)

48.4 (43.6-52.5)

19 (14-21)

56.0 (51.0-60.5)

15 (10-20)

Malaysia 825 (817-831)

2 (2-3)

726 (714-735)

4 (4-4)

19,850 (19,533-20,190)

1 (1-2)

16,000 (15,721-16,270)

3 (2-3)

11,926 (9,901-14,286)

5 (3-9)

11,186 (9,322-13,427)

6 (3-10)

71.6 (71.5-71.6)

2 (2-3)

73.7 (73.5-73.9)

4 (3-4)

62.0 (60.2-63.7)

2 (2-4)

64.4 (62.5-66.0)

4 (3-4)

Marshall Islands 1,270 (1,204-1,340)

12 (11-15)

1,309 (1,134-1,507)

18 (15-19)

36,253 (33,971-38,609)

11 (10-12)

36,337 (30,584-43,200)

18 (14-19)

14,368 (11,695-17,264)

17 (12-21)

13,968 (11,409-16,775)

20 (16-21)

63.9 (62.3-65.5)

11 (9-13)

63.9 (60.6-66.9)

18 (13-20)

54.0 (51.7-56.2)

11 (10-14)

54.4 (51.2-57.1)

19 (14-20)

Federated States of Micronesia

1,476 (1,226-1,760)

15 (12-19)

1,258 (1,015-1,620)

16 (12-19)

42,732 (34,521-51,343)

13 (11-18)

31,526 (24,359-41,443)

13 (10-18)

13,632 (11,181-16,374)

16 (9-19)

12,681 (10,357-15,299)

17 (9-19)

61.4 (55.0-67.2)

13 (8-20)

66.0 (59.5-71.5)

13 (6-20)

52.5 (47.6-57.0)

14 (9-19)

56.9 (51.8-61.5)

13 (7-20)

Mongolia 1,283 (1,226-1,334)

13 (11-15)

1,218 (1,134-1,275)

15 (14-18)

44,720 (42,159-47,172)

14 (12-16)

34,325 (31,672-36,281)

15 (13-18)

11,523 (9,367-13,876)

4 (2-9)

11,482 (9,373-13,782)

7 (4-14)

60.5 (59.8-61.1)

15 (13-16)

64.6 (63.2-66.0)

17 (13-19)

52.8 (51.1-54.3)

13 (11-15)

56.5 (54.6-58.3)

14 (12-17)

Myanmar 1,640 (1,317-2,192)

18 (14-21)

1,185 (924-1,549)

14 (10-19)

55,134 (45,237-72,341)

18 (16-21)

36,251 (28,627-47,420)

17 (13-20)

13,542 (11,178-16,362)

15 (9-18)

11,974 (9,854-14,386)

10 (6-16)

56.8 (49.8-61.8)

18 (13-21)

64.2 (57.9-69.5)

16 (9-21)

48.7 (43.4-52.9)

18 (14-21)

55.8 (50.5-59.9)

16 (10-20)

North Korea 895 (806-996)

4 (2-7)

832 (769-898)

5 (5-10)

25,915 (21,408-31,689)

5 (3-8)

21,755 (19,020-24,828)

6 (5-9)

10,569 (8,572-13,047)

2 (1-4)

10,347 (8,372-12,618)

3 (2-6)

68.9 (63.8-72.2)

6 (1-11)

70.8 (68.2-72.9)

6 (5-10)

60.7 (55.8-64.1)

4 (1-9)

62.4 (59.7-64.8)

5 (4-8)

Papua New Guinea 1,990 (1,552-2,531)

21 (18-21)

1,700 (1,249-2,230)

21 (17-21)

64,195 (51,321-81,065)

21 (18-21)

49,553 (36,132-66,110)

21 (19-21)

14,891 (12,129-17,954)

20 (16-21)

13,793 (11,185-16,647)

19 (16-21)

54.3 (47.0-59.9)

21 (15-21)

59.2 (51.8-65.2)

21 (15-21)

46.1 (40.7-50.8)

21 (16-21)

50.8 (44.5-55.8)

21 (16-21)

Philippines 909 (889-928)

7 (4-7)

868 (839-894)

8 (6-10)

28,515 (27,455-29,543)

8 (6-8)

23,262 (22,258-24,190)

8 (6-9)

13,334 (11,117-16,042)

13 (9-17)

12,483 (10,313-15,012)

14 (9-17)

67.8 (67.5-68.1)

7 (6-8)

70.1 (69.2-71.0)

8 (5-10)

57.7 (55.6-59.4)

8 (6-9)

60.2 (58.1-62.0)

9 (7-10)

Samoa 1,088 (979-1,225)

9 (8-11)

863 (760-1,012)

6 (5-11)

28,245 (25,185-32,115)

7 (5-9)

21,441 (18,386-25,965)

5 (5-9)

12,397 (10,122-15,071)

8 (4-13)

11,587 (9,532-14,088)

8 (4-16)

67.3 (64.2-70.3)

8 (3-11)

70.8 (68.7-72.6)

5 (5-10)

58.0 (55.1-61.0)

7 (4-10)

61.4 (59.0-63.8)

6 (5-9)

Solomon Islands 1,707 (1,360-2,295)

19 (15-21)

1,510 (1,194-1,898)

19 (17-21)

47,851 (36,744-65,204)

16 (12-20)

40,489 (30,586-52,994)

19 (15-21)

13,520 (11,141-16,339)

14 (9-19)

12,482 (10,122-15,101)

13 (8-18)

59.8 (52.8-65.5)

16 (10-21)

62.3 (56.3-67.9)

19 (12-21)

51.5 (45.8-56.1)

15 (10-21)

54.2 (49.2-58.9)

18 (11-21)

Thailand 712 (694-734)

1 (1-1)

663 (629-689)

3 (3-3)

20,676 (19,744-21,829)

2 (2-3)

17,227 (16,358-18,065)

4 (4-4)

11,069 (9,071-13,228)

3 (2-5)

10,369 (8,591-12,324)

2 (2-5)

72.4 (71.6-73.2)

1 (1-2)

74.1 (73.1-75.3)

3 (2-4)

63.1 (61.1-64.8)

1 (1-2)

65.2 (63.3-66.9)

3 (2-4)

Timor-Leste 1,223 (1,141-1,330)

11 (10-14)

872 (829-932)

9 (5-10)

45,244 (41,396-49,626)

15 (12-17)

26,770 (25,276-28,562)

10 (9-12)

14,698 (12,107-17,655)

19 (14-21)

13,715 (11,212-16,588)

18 (15-21)

60.5 (59.2-61.6)

14 (12-17)

68.7 (67.6-69.8)

10 (8-12)

50.7 (48.6-52.7)

16 (14-18)

58.0 (55.7-60.1)

11 (10-15)

Tonga 914 (828-990)

6 (3-7)

882 (811-1,018)

10 (5-12)

22,822 (20,145-24,995)

3 (2-4)

22,195 (20,160-26,850)

7 (5-10)

12,546 (10,245-15,204)

9 (5-15)

11,940 (9,710-14,478)

9 (5-17)

70.1 (67.6-72.0)

3 (2-7)

70.5 (68.6-72.2)

7 (5-10)

60.1 (57.5-62.6)

5 (3-7)

60.9 (58.3-63.3)

8 (5-10)

Vanuatu 1,507 (1,239-1,830)

16 (12-19)

1,291 (1,051-1,587)

17 (13-19)

41,590 (33,925-51,437)

12 (10-17)

34,595 (27,270-42,984)

14 (12-19)

13,346 (10,934-16,107)

12 (8-18)

12,657 (10,303-15,379)

16 (8-19)

61.9 (54.2-67.7)

12 (7-20)

64.6 (58.7-69.6)

15 (9-21)

53.3 (47.2-57.9)

12 (8-19)

55.8 (51.0-60.1)

17 (10-20)

Vietnam 876 (832-931)

3 (3-7)

595 (530-636)

1 (1-2)

26,230 (24,565-28,008)

6 (4-7)

15,123 (13,425-16,427)

2 (1-3)

12,188 (10,027-14,672)

7 (4-10)

10,909 (9,038-13,075)

4 (2-8)

68.9 (67.9-69.9)

5 (3-7)

75.6 (74.1-77.2)

2 (1-3)

59.4 (57.4-61.3)

6 (4-7)

65.8 (63.5-67.8)

2 (2-4)

Page 58: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

56 | GBD 2010

CHANGES IN LEADING CAUSES OF DALYS BETWEEN 1990 AND 2010 FOR COUNTRIES IN EAST ASIA AND PACIFIC

In the following figures, pointed arrows indicate causes that have increased by a greater amount than shown on the x-axis. For more country data, explore IHME’s data visualization tools online: www.ihmeuw.org/GBDcountryviz

RankingsoftotalDALYsfortop20causesinCambodia,1990-2010

LOWERRESPIRATORYINFECTIONS

ISCHEMICHEARTDISEASE

STROKE

PRETERMBIRTHCOMPLICATIONS

TUBERCULOSIS

CONGENITALANOMALIES

IRON-DEFICIENCYANEMIA

ROADINJURY

MAJORDEPRESSIVEDISORDER

DIARRHEALDISEASES

NEONATALENCEPHALOPATHY

LOWBACKPAIN

COPD

MALARIA

ASTHMA

HIV/AIDS

DIABETES

MENINGITIS

SELF-HARM

DROWNING

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

%changeintotalDALYs,1990-2010

shifts in leading causes of dalys in cambodia, 1990-2010

Page 59: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

57 | GBD 2010

RankingsoftotalDALYsfortop20causesinFiji,1990-2010

ISCHEMICHEARTDISEASE

DIABETES

LOWERRESPIRATORYINFECTIONS

STROKE

PRETERMBIRTHCOMPLICATIONS

LOWBACKPAIN

CONGENITALANOMALIES

MAJORDEPRESSIVEDISORDER

ASTHMA

COPD

DIARRHEALDISEASES

OTHERMUSCULOSKELETAL

NEONATALENCEPHALOPATHY

ROADINJURY

CHRONICKIDNEYDISEASE

IRON-DEFICIENCYANEMIA

NECKPAIN

BREASTCANCER

MENINGITIS

FALLS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

%changeintotalDALYs,1990-2010

shifts in leading causes of dalys in fiji, 1990-2010

RankingsoftotalDALYsfortop20causesinChina,1990-2010

STROKE

ISCHEMICHEARTDISEASE

COPD

LOWBACKPAIN

ROADINJURY

LUNGCANCER

LIVERCANCER

MAJORDEPRESSIVEDISORDER

DIABETES

FALLS

NECKPAIN

STOMACHCANCER

SELF-HARM

OTHERMUSCULOSKELETAL

LOWERRESPIRATORYINFECTIONS

CONGENITALANOMALIES

OSTEOARTHRITIS

ESOPHAGEALCANCER

DROWNING

COLORECTALCANCER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80

%changeintotalDALYs,1990-2010

shifts in leading causes of dalys in china, 1990-2010

Page 60: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

58 | GBD 2010

RankingsoftotalDALYsfortop20causesinKiribati,1990-2010

DIABETES

STROKE

LOWERRESPIRATORYINFECTIONS

ISCHEMICHEARTDISEASE

TUBERCULOSIS

TRICHURIASIS

MAJORDEPRESSIVEDISORDER

ROADINJURY

DIARRHEALDISEASES

PROTEIN-ENERGYMALNUTRITION

LOWBACKPAIN

ASTHMA

OTHERMUSCULOSKELETAL

CIRRHOSIS

NEONATALENCEPHALOPATHY

SELF-HARM

COPD

PRETERMBIRTHCOMPLICATIONS

CHRONICKIDNEYDISEASE

MENINGITIS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

%changeintotalDALYs,1990-2010

shifts in leading causes of dalys in Kiribati, 1990-2010

RankingsoftotalDALYsfortop20causesinIndonesia,1990-2010

STROKE

TUBERCULOSIS

ROADINJURY

DIARRHEALDISEASES

ISCHEMICHEARTDISEASE

DIABETES

LOWBACKPAIN

MAJORDEPRESSIVEDISORDER

LOWERRESPIRATORYINFECTIONS

NEONATALENCEPHALOPATHY

COPD

PRETERMBIRTHCOMPLICATIONS

IRON-DEFICIENCYANEMIA

CIRRHOSIS

CHRONICKIDNEYDISEASE

NECKPAIN

TYPHOIDFEVERS

NEONATALSEPSIS

OTHERMUSCULOSKELETAL

MIGRAINE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100

%changeintotalDALYs,1990-2010

shifts in leading causes of dalys in indonesia, 1990-2010

Page 61: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

59 | GBD 2010

RankingsoftotalDALYsfortop20causesinLaos,1990-2010

LOWERRESPIRATORYINFECTIONS

ISCHEMICHEARTDISEASE

DIARRHEALDISEASES

CONGENITALANOMALIES

STROKE

PRETERMBIRTHCOMPLICATIONS

TUBERCULOSIS

MAJORDEPRESSIVEDISORDER

ROADINJURY

NEONATALENCEPHALOPATHY

IRON-DEFICIENCYANEMIA

COPD

LOWBACKPAIN

ASTHMA

DIABETES

MENINGITIS

SELF-HARM

INTERPERSONALVIOLENCE

PROTEIN-ENERGYMALNUTRITION

MALARIA

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80

%changeintotalDALYs,1990-2010

shifts in leading causes of dalys in laos, 1990-2010

RankingsoftotalDALYsfortop20causesinMalaysia,1990-2010

ISCHEMICHEARTDISEASE

STROKE

MAJORDEPRESSIVEDISORDER

LOWERRESPIRATORYINFECTIONS

HIV/AIDS

COPD

ROADINJURY

LOWBACKPAIN

DIABETES

ANXIETYDISORDERS

OTHERMUSCULOSKELETAL

FALLS

NECKPAIN

OTHERTRANSPORTINJURIES

MIGRAINE

ASTHMA

TRICHURIASIS

LUNGCANCER

IRON-DEFICIENCYANEMIA

CONGENITALANOMALIES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

%changeintotalDALYs,1990-2010

shifts in leading causes of dalys in Malaysia, 1990-2010

Page 62: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

60 | GBD 2010

RankingsoftotalDALYsfortop20causesintheFederatedStatesofMicronesia,1990-2010

DIABETES

ISCHEMICHEARTDISEASE

STROKE

LOWERRESPIRATORYINFECTIONS

LOWBACKPAIN

MAJORDEPRESSIVEDISORDER

ASTHMA

ROADINJURY

TUBERCULOSIS

COPD

IRON-DEFICIENCYANEMIA

OTHERMUSCULOSKELETAL

SELF-HARM

CHRONICKIDNEYDISEASE

CIRRHOSIS

DIARRHEALDISEASES

PRETERMBIRTHCOMPLICATIONS

DRUGUSEDISORDERS

EPILEPSY

MENINGITIS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80

%changeintotalDALYs,1990-2010

shifts in leading causes of dalys in the federated states of Micronesia, 1990-2010

RankingsoftotalDALYsfortop20causesintheMarshallIslands,1990-2010

DIABETES

ISCHEMICHEARTDISEASE

LOWERRESPIRATORYINFECTIONS

STROKE

PRETERMBIRTHCOMPLICATIONS

MAJORDEPRESSIVEDISORDER

TUBERCULOSIS

CHRONICKIDNEYDISEASE

LOWBACKPAIN

DIARRHEALDISEASES

ROADINJURY

CONGENITALANOMALIES

OTHERMUSCULOSKELETAL

DRUGUSEDISORDERS

NEONATALENCEPHALOPATHY

MENINGITIS

ASTHMA

COPD

TRICHURIASIS

IRON-DEFICIENCYANEMIA

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

%changeintotalDALYs,1990-2010

shifts in leading causes of dalys in the Marshall islands, 1990-2010

Page 63: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

61 | GBD 2010

RankingsoftotalDALYsfortop20causesinMongolia,1990-2010

ISCHEMICHEARTDISEASE

LOWERRESPIRATORYINFECTIONS

STROKE

NEONATALENCEPHALOPATHY

ROADINJURY

CIRRHOSIS

PRETERMBIRTHCOMPLICATIONS

LIVERCANCER

CONGENITALANOMALIES

MAJORDEPRESSIVEDISORDER

TUBERCULOSIS

LOWBACKPAIN

COPD

CHRONICKIDNEYDISEASE

ALCOHOLUSEDISORDERS

STOMACHCANCER

SELF-HARM

RHEUMATICHEARTDISEASE

INTERPERSONALVIOLENCE

MECHANICALFORCES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120

%changeintotalDALYs,1990-2010

RankingsoftotalDALYsfortop20causesinMyanmar,1990-2010

LOWERRESPIRATORYINFECTIONS

TUBERCULOSIS

DIARRHEALDISEASES

HIV/AIDS

STROKE

MALARIA

COPD

ISCHEMICHEARTDISEASE

ROADINJURY

CIRRHOSIS

NEONATALENCEPHALOPATHY

MAJORDEPRESSIVEDISORDER

CONGENITALANOMALIES

PRETERMBIRTHCOMPLICATIONS

DIABETES

INTERPERSONALVIOLENCE

ASTHMA

LOWBACKPAIN

FALLS

SELF-HARM

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

%changeintotalDALYs,1990-2010

shifts in leading causes of dalys in Mongolia, 1990-2010

shifts in leading causes of dalys in Myanmar, 1990-2010

Page 64: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

62 | GBD 2010

RankingsoftotalDALYsfortop20causesinNorthKorea,1990-2010

STROKE

COPD

ISCHEMICHEARTDISEASE

LOWERRESPIRATORYINFECTIONS

SELF-HARM

LOWBACKPAIN

LUNGCANCER

LIVERCANCER

ROADINJURY

CONGENITALANOMALIES

TUBERCULOSIS

IRON-DEFICIENCYANEMIA

CIRRHOSIS

DIABETES

MAJORDEPRESSIVEDISORDER

FALLS

NECKPAIN

OTHERMUSCULOSKELETAL

PRETERMBIRTHCOMPLICATIONS

CHRONICKIDNEYDISEASE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80

%changeintotalDALYs,1990-2010

RankingsoftotalDALYsfortop20causesinPapuaNewGuinea,1990-2010

LOWERRESPIRATORYINFECTIONS

DIABETES

TUBERCULOSIS

DIARRHEALDISEASES

MALARIA

HIV/AIDS

PRETERMBIRTHCOMPLICATIONS

MENINGITIS

ASTHMA

CHRONICKIDNEYDISEASE

MAJORDEPRESSIVEDISORDER

ISCHEMICHEARTDISEASE

CIRRHOSIS

ROADINJURY

LOWBACKPAIN

CONGENITALANOMALIES

POISONINGS

COPD

MATERNALDISORDERS

IRON-DEFICIENCYANEMIA

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

%changeintotalDALYs,1990-2010

shifts in leading causes of dalys in north Korea, 1990-2010

shifts in leading causes of dalys in Papua new Guinea, 1990-2010

Page 65: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

63 | GBD 2010

RankingsoftotalDALYsfortop20causesinthePhilippines,1990-2010

LOWERRESPIRATORYINFECTIONS

ISCHEMICHEARTDISEASE

TUBERCULOSIS

STROKE

PRETERMBIRTHCOMPLICATIONS

LOWBACKPAIN

MAJORDEPRESSIVEDISORDER

INTERPERSONALVIOLENCE

CONGENITALANOMALIES

COPD

DIABETES

IRON-DEFICIENCYANEMIA

ROADINJURY

NEONATALENCEPHALOPATHY

DIARRHEALDISEASES

ASTHMA

CHRONICKIDNEYDISEASE

HYPERTENSIVEHEARTDISEASE

NECKPAIN

MIGRAINE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

%changeintotalDALYs,1990-2010

shifts in leading causes of dalys in the Philippines, 1990-2010

RankingsoftotalDALYsfortop20causesinSamoa,1990-2010

DIABETES

LOWERRESPIRATORYINFECTIONS

STROKE

LOWBACKPAIN

ISCHEMICHEARTDISEASE

MAJORDEPRESSIVEDISORDER

OTHERMUSCULOSKELETAL

COPD

ASTHMA

DRUGUSEDISORDERS

ROADINJURY

PRETERMBIRTHCOMPLICATIONS

CHRONICKIDNEYDISEASE

IRON-DEFICIENCYANEMIA

INTERPERSONALVIOLENCE

NECKPAIN

FALLS

NEONATALENCEPHALOPATHY

CIRRHOSIS

DIARRHEALDISEASES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80

%changeintotalDALYs,1990-2010

shifts in leading causes of dalys in samoa, 1990-2010

Page 66: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

64 | GBD 2010

RankingsoftotalDALYsfortop20causesinThailand,1990-2010

HIV/AIDS

ISCHEMICHEARTDISEASE

ROADINJURY

STROKE

MAJORDEPRESSIVEDISORDER

LOWERRESPIRATORYINFECTIONS

LIVERCANCER

LOWBACKPAIN

DIABETES

COPD

SELF-HARM

LUNGCANCER

INTERPERSONALVIOLENCE

CIRRHOSIS

CHRONICKIDNEYDISEASE

OTHERMUSCULOSKELETAL

DROWNING

NECKPAIN

TUBERCULOSIS

MIGRAINE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

%changeintotalDALYs,1990-2010

shifts in leading causes of dalys in Thailand, 1990-2010

RankingsoftotalDALYsfortop20causesintheSolomonIslands,1990-2010

DIABETES

STROKE

LOWERRESPIRATORYINFECTIONS

ISCHEMICHEARTDISEASE

TUBERCULOSIS

DIARRHEALDISEASES

PRETERMBIRTHCOMPLICATIONS

ASTHMA

LOWBACKPAIN

ROADINJURY

COPD

NEONATALENCEPHALOPATHY

MENINGITIS

PROTEIN-ENERGYMALNUTRITION

MAJORDEPRESSIVEDISORDER

MALARIA

SELF-HARM

CIRRHOSIS

CHRONICKIDNEYDISEASE

IRON-DEFICIENCYANEMIA

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

-20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

%changeintotalDALYs,1990-2010

shifts in leading causes of dalys in the solomon islands, 1990-2010

Page 67: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

65 | GBD 2010

RankingsoftotalDALYsfortop20causesinTonga,1990-2010

DIABETES

ISCHEMICHEARTDISEASE

LOWERRESPIRATORYINFECTIONS

LOWBACKPAIN

MAJORDEPRESSIVEDISORDER

PRETERMBIRTHCOMPLICATIONS

STROKE

ASTHMA

DRUGUSEDISORDERS

OTHERMUSCULOSKELETAL

ROADINJURY

CONGENITALANOMALIES

COPD

IRON-DEFICIENCYANEMIA

CHRONICKIDNEYDISEASE

MENINGITIS

DIARRHEALDISEASES

INTERPERSONALVIOLENCE

CIRRHOSIS

NECKPAIN

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120

%changeintotalDALYs,1990-2010

RankingsoftotalDALYsfortop20causesinTimor-Leste,1990-2010

LOWERRESPIRATORYINFECTIONS

DIARRHEALDISEASES

PRETERMBIRTHCOMPLICATIONS

CONGENITALANOMALIES

TUBERCULOSIS

ISCHEMICHEARTDISEASE

NEONATALENCEPHALOPATHY

STROKE

MAJORDEPRESSIVEDISORDER

IRON-DEFICIENCYANEMIA

MALARIA

MENINGITIS

PROTEIN-ENERGYMALNUTRITION

LOWBACKPAIN

ROADINJURY

COPD

MATERNALDISORDERS

ASTHMA

DIABETES

DROWNING

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

-60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

%changeintotalDALYs,1990-2010

shifts in leading causes of dalys in Tonga, 1990-2010

shifts in leading causes of dalys in Timor-leste, 1990-2010

RankingsoftotalDALYsfortop20causesinThailand,1990-2010

HIV/AIDS

ISCHEMICHEARTDISEASE

ROADINJURY

STROKE

MAJORDEPRESSIVEDISORDER

LOWERRESPIRATORYINFECTIONS

LIVERCANCER

LOWBACKPAIN

DIABETES

COPD

SELF-HARM

LUNGCANCER

INTERPERSONALVIOLENCE

CIRRHOSIS

CHRONICKIDNEYDISEASE

OTHERMUSCULOSKELETAL

DROWNING

NECKPAIN

TUBERCULOSIS

MIGRAINE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

%changeintotalDALYs,1990-2010

RankingsoftotalDALYsfortop20causesintheSolomonIslands,1990-2010

DIABETES

STROKE

LOWERRESPIRATORYINFECTIONS

ISCHEMICHEARTDISEASE

TUBERCULOSIS

DIARRHEALDISEASES

PRETERMBIRTHCOMPLICATIONS

ASTHMA

LOWBACKPAIN

ROADINJURY

COPD

NEONATALENCEPHALOPATHY

MENINGITIS

PROTEIN-ENERGYMALNUTRITION

MAJORDEPRESSIVEDISORDER

MALARIA

SELF-HARM

CIRRHOSIS

CHRONICKIDNEYDISEASE

IRON-DEFICIENCYANEMIA

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

-20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

%changeintotalDALYs,1990-2010

Page 68: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

66 | GBD 2010

RankingsoftotalDALYsfortop20causesinVanuatu,1990-2010

STROKE

DIABETES

LOWERRESPIRATORYINFECTIONS

ISCHEMICHEARTDISEASE

PRETERMBIRTHCOMPLICATIONS

DIARRHEALDISEASES

ROADINJURY

TUBERCULOSIS

LOWBACKPAIN

ASTHMA

MAJORDEPRESSIVEDISORDER

NEONATALENCEPHALOPATHY

COPD

PROTEIN-ENERGYMALNUTRITION

MENINGITIS

IRON-DEFICIENCYANEMIA

CONGENITALANOMALIES

SELF-HARM

CIRRHOSIS

OTHERMUSCULOSKELETAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

-20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

%changeintotalDALYs,1990-2010

shifts in leading causes of dalys in vanuatu, 1990-2010

RankingsoftotalDALYsfortop20causesinVietnam,1990-2010

STROKE

ROADINJURY

LOWBACKPAIN

MAJORDEPRESSIVEDISORDER

COPD

HIV/AIDS

LOWERRESPIRATORYINFECTIONS

LIVERCANCER

ISCHEMICHEARTDISEASE

TUBERCULOSIS

PRETERMBIRTHCOMPLICATIONS

CIRRHOSIS

LUNGCANCER

NECKPAIN

DIABETES

DROWNING

FALLS

OTHERMUSCULOSKELETAL

MIGRAINE

ASTHMA

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

%changeintotalDALYs,1990-2010

shifts in leading causes of dalys in vietnam, 1990-2010

Page 69: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development
Page 70: THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE: GENERATING ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/758591468027855762/...Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Human Development

THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE:

GENERATING EVIDENCE, GUIDING POLICY

INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH METRICS AND EVALUATION

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON

HUMAN DEVELOPMENT NETWORK

THE WORLD BANK

EAST ASIA AND PACIFIC REGIONAL EDITION


Recommended