THE USE OF PICTURE SERIES FOR TEACHING STUDENTS
TO WRITE NARRATIVE TEXTS IN CLASS VIII F OF SMP
NEGERI 10 SURAKARTA
A SARJANA PENDIDIKAN THESIS
Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
to Obtain the Sarjana Pendidikan Degree
in English Language Education
By
Floriberta Ratih Dewanti N.
Student Number: 101214102
ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM
DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGE AND ARTS EDUCATION
FACULTY OF TEACHERS TRAINING AND EDUCATION
SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY
YOGYAKARTA
2014
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
i
THE USE OF PICTURE SERIES FOR TEACHING STUDENTS
TO WRITE NARRATIVE TEXTS IN CLASS VIII F OF SMP
NEGERI 10 SURAKARTA
A SARJANA PENDIDIKAN THESIS
Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
to Obtain the Sarjana Pendidikan Degree
in English Language Education
By
Floriberta Ratih Dewanti N.
Student Number: 101214102
ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM
DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGE AND ARTS EDUCATION
FACULTY OF TEACHERS TRAINING AND EDUCATION
SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY
YOGYAKARTA
2014
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
vi
DEDICATION PAGE
But those who hope in the LORD
will renew their strength.
They will soar on wings like eagles;
they will run and not grow weary,
they will walk and not be faint
(Isaiah 40: 31)
And whatever you ask in prayer,
you will receive, if you have faith.
(Matthew 21:22)
I dedicate this thesis to:
My Almighty Jesus Christ
and for those who believe in the power of pray
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
vii
ABSTRACT
Dewanti, Floriberta Ratih. (2014). The Use of Picture Series for Teaching
Students to Write Narrative Texts in Class VIII F of SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta.
Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University.
English is one of subjects in Indonesia. It becomes the first foreign
language that has to be taught in every school in Indonesia. Students have to
master four language skills in it: listening, speaking, reading, and writing. In order
to master English, the students have to comprehend those four skills.
Unfortunately, many students think that writing is the most difficult skill to be
mastered. Based on the preliminary study which was conducted by the researcher,
the students of VIII F class of SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta had difficulties in writing
narrative texts.
This research was aimed to overcome the problems encountered by the
students of VIII F class of SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta by using picture series.
Picture series was offered as a solution because it gives many advantages in
learning writing. The formulated problems of this study are: to what extent does
picture series help students VIII F class of SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta in writing
narrative texts? How is the use of picture series implemented in writing narrative
texts toward students VIII F class of SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta to improve their
writing skills?
This research employed classroom action research to help the students
improve their writing skills in composing narrative texts. The participants of this
research were 26 students in VIII F class of SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta. The
researcher employed two cycles. In cycle one, the researcher conducted two
meetings, while in cycle two, the researcher conducted one meeting. The data
were obtained by using several research instruments: observations sheets, field
notes, students‟ writing, questionnaire, and interview.
The results of this research showed that the use of picture series improved
students‟ writing skills in composing narrative texts. The significant improvement
could be seen from the students‟ scores of the preliminary study until the second
cycle of this study. The number of the students who reached the passing grade of
English subject increased. Picture series becomes the appropriate technique to
help the students improve their writing skills in narrative texts.
Keywords: classroom action research, writing skills, narrative texts, picture series
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
viii
ABSTRAK
Dewanti, Floriberta Ratih. (2014). The Use of Picture Series for Teaching
Students to Write Narrative Texts in Class VIII F of SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta.
Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University.
Bahasa Inggris adalah salah satu mata pelajaran di Indonesia. Bahasa
Inggris menjadi bahasa asing pertama yang harus diajarkan di setiap sekolah di
Indonesia. Siswa harus menguasai 4 kemampuan yaitu mendengkarkan, berbiara,
membaca dan menulis. Untuk dapat menguasai Bahasa Inggris dengan baik,
siswa harus memahami ke-empat kemampuan tersebut. Sayangnya, banyak siswa
berpikir bahwa menulis merupan kemampuan tersulit untuk dikuasai.
Berdasarkan studi awal peneliti, siswa kelas VIII F di SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta
mengalami kesulitan dalam menulis teks naratif.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengatasi masalah siswa kelas VIII F di
SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta dengan mengunakan gambar berseri. Gambar berseri
ditawarkan sebagai satu solusi karena memberikan banyak keuntungan dalam
pembelajaran menulis. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah: sejauh
mana gambar berseri membantu siswa kelas VIII F di SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta
dalam menulis teks naratif? Bagaimana penggunaan gambar berseri diterapkan
untuk menulis teks naratif kepada siswa kelas VIII F di SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta
untuk meningkatkan kemampuan menulis mereka?
Penelitian ini menggunakan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK) untuk
membantu siswa dalam meningkatkan kemampuan Bahasa Inggris dalam
menyususn teks naratif. Peserta dalam penelitian ini adalah 26 siswa dari kelas
VIII F di SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta. Peneliti membuat dua siklus dalam penelitian
ini. Siklus satu peneliti melakukan dua pertemua, sedangkan pada siklus dua,
peneliti melakukan satu pertemuan. Data dalam penelitian ini diperoleh melalui
beberpa instrument: lembar observasi, catatan lapangan, hasil tulisan siswa,
kuisioner, dan wawancara.
Hasil analisa dalam penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwaa penggunaan
gambar berseri meningkatkan kemampuan menulis siswa dalam menyusun teks
naratif. Peningkatan yang signifikan dapat dilihat dari nilai siswa dari studi awal
hingga siklus kedua. Jumlah siswa yang dapat mencapai kriteria ketuntasan
minimal dari mata pelajaran Bahasa Inggris meningkat. Dengan demikian,
gambar berseri merupakan teknik yang sesuai untuk membantu sswa
meningkatkan kemampuan Bahasa Inggris mereka dalam menulis naratif teks.
Kata Kunci: classroom action research, writing skills, narrative texts, picture
series
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
ix
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
First of all, I would like to send my gratefulness to the Almighty God,
Jesus Christ for having made everything possible by giving me strength and
courage to do this thesis. He always makes me believe in the power of hopes and
prayers so that everything was done in His right time.
I would like to express my deep and sincere gratitude to my advisor, Drs.
Pius Nurwidasa Prihatin, M.Ed., Ed.D., for his extreme patience and support
during the completion of this thesis. I thank him for giving me the opportunity to
do research and providing invaluable guidance throughout the process of finishing
this thesis. His encouragements, life values, sincerity, empathy, and motivation
have deeply inspired me to be a better person. I then thank my examiners, Dr.
Retno Muljani, M.Pd. and V. Triprihatmini, S.Pd., M.Hum., M.A. for their
fruitful feedback.
My deepest gratitude was also addressed to the headmaster of SMP Negeri
10 Surakarta, Bambang Edy Kusumo Mardiyanto, S.Pd., M.Pd for giving me
the opportunity to conduct my research in the school. I also thank to the English
teacher of class VIII F, Saptowati, S.Pd., because she always gave me comments
and support so I could conduct the research successfully. My deep gratitude also
goes to class VIII F students for their cooperative participation in this research.
I also send my sincere gratitude to my uncle for his willingness to
proofread my thesis, Drs. V. Sudarna Hadi S., M.Pd. and his family for always
supporting me in conducting this research. I thank him for his corrections,
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
x
suggestions, and advice of my thesis so that finally I could revise errors and
mistakes that were found.
I am extremely grateful to my parents, my beloved father Robertus
Isbudiyanto, my beloved mother Roberta Maria Imbar Windyarti, and my
beloved brother, Yustinus Sigit Pinda Sadewa, my beloved aunt and uncle,
Bulik Ririn and Om Manuel for their love, care, prayer, and advice to educate
and prepare me for my future. There is no word which can express my happiness
belongs to this family. Also, my great gratefulness belongs to Mas Jo‟s family:
FX. Saring, Martha Rahayu Kanti Suprihatingsih, and Yakobus Emanuel
Guntur for their love, care, and encouragement so that I could finish my thesis.
I would also express my gratitude to all my best friends: Gistha, Anin,
Siwi, Ajeng, Mbak Nay, Yeskha, Dyah, Dhea, Susi and Tika for their treasured
friendship. I thank them for their support and sharing throughout the good and bad
times. My gratefulness also belongs to Firdy Siwi, Riska, Sandra, Aulia, Epi,
Pritha, Ikha, There, and to those who always support my thesis with their own
ways.
I would send my deepest gratefulness and love to my partner in life,
Philipus Yonathan Eko Nugroho. I thank him for his uncounted love, patience,
care, and encouragement during the good and bad times. I thank him for his
advice in teaching me to keep hoping, struggling, and praying.
Last but not least, I would also thank those whose names cannot be
mentioned one by one. May the Almighty God richly bless all of them.
Floriberta Ratih Dewanti Nugrahaningtyas
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
TITLE PAGE ..................................................................................................... i
APPROVAL PAGE ........................................................................................... ii
STATEMENT OF WORK‟S ORIGINALITY .................................................. iv
PERNYATAAN PERSETUJUAN PUBLIKASI .............................................. v
DEDICATION PAGE ....................................................................................... vi
ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................... vii
ABSTRAK ......................................................................................................... viii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................... ix
TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................... xi
LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................. xiv
LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................... xv
LIST OF APPENDICES .................................................................................... xvi
CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION
A. Research Background ............................................................................ 1
B. Research Problems ................................................................................. 6
C. Problem Limitation ................................................................................ 6
D. Research Objectives ............................................................................... 6
E. Research Benefits ................................................................................... 7
F. Definition of Terms ................................................................................ 8
CHAPTER II. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
A. Theoretical Description .......................................................................... 13
1. Writing Skills ................................................................................... 13
2. Text-Based Approach ...................................................................... 21
3. Narrative Text .................................................................................. 24
4. Picture Series ................................................................................... 26
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xii
5. Classroom Action Research ............................................................. 28
B. Theoretical Framework .......................................................................... 33
CHAPTER III. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
A. Research Method ................................................................................... 36
B. Research Setting ..................................................................................... 37
C. Research Participants ............................................................................. 37
D. Instruments and Data Gathering Technique........................................... 38
E. Data Analysis Technique ....................................................................... 48
F. Research Procedure ................................................................................ 51
CHAPTER IV. RESEARCH RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A. The Preliminary Study ........................................................................... 54
1. Classroom Activities in the Preliminary Study………………… 55
2. Students‟ Activities in the Preliminary Study…………………. 56
3. Researcher‟s Reflection in the Preliminary Study……………. 58
B. Picture Series Technique as a New Strategy .......................................... 60
1. The Implementation of Picture Series in Cycle 1…………….... 60
a. Planning……………………………………………………... 61
b. Action……………………………………………………….. 66
c. Observation…………………………………………………. 71
1) The Analysis of Observation Checklist and Field
Notes of Cycle 1 ................................................................. 72
2) The Analysis of Students‟ Score and Questionnaire
Of Cycle 1........................................................................... 76
d. Reflection ................................................................................. 84
e. Changes in Cycle 2 ................................................................... 85
2. The Implementation of Picture Series in Cycle 2 ........................... 87
a. Planning .................................................................................... 88
b. Action ....................................................................................... 91
c. Observation ................................................................................ 93
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xiii
1) The Analysis of Observation Checklist and Field
Notes of Cycle 2 .................................................................... 94
2) The Analysis of Students‟ s Score and Questionnaire
of Cycle 2 ............................................................................. 96
d. Reflection ................................................................................... 105
3. Lesson Learned after the Implementation of Picture Series
Technique to Improve Students‟ Writing Skills ............................. 106
CHAPTER V. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Conclusions ............................................................................................ 109
B. Recommendations .................................................................................. 112
REFERENCES .................................................................................................. 114
APPENDICES ................................................................................................... 118
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xiv
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
3.1 Instruments and Data Collection ............................................................. 38
3.2 Result of Questionnaire ........................................................................... 43
3.3 Criteria of Mean Score ............................................................................ 43
3.4 Analytic Scoring Rubric of Writing Ability ............................................ 47
4.1 Students‟ Achievement Score in Preliminary Study ............................... 56
4.2 Students‟ Achievement Score in Cycle 1 ................................................ 77
4.3 Students‟ Achievement Score in Cycle 2 ................................................ 97
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xv
LIST OF FIGURE
Figure Page
2.1 Kemmis & McTaggartAction Research Model ..................................... 31
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xvi
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix Page
A. Covering Letter for the headmaster of
SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta ...................................................................... 118
B. Research Statement of Data Safety ....................................................... 120
C. Research Instruments............................................................................. 122
1. Observation Sheet ............................................................................ 123
2. Field Notes....................................................................................... 125
3. Writing Scoring Rubric ................................................................... 126
4. Questionnaire ................................................................................... 128
5. Interview Guide ............................................................................... 132
D. Lesson Plan and Teaching Material ...................................................... 133
1. Lesson Plan and Teaching Material in Cycle 1 ............................... 134
2. Lesson Plan and Teaching Material in Cycle 2 ............................... 149
E. Observation Sheet Results ..................................................................... 159
1. Observation Sheet from the Researcher in the
Preliminary Study ............................................................................ 160
2. Observation Sheet from Observer A in Cycle 1Meeting 1 .............. 162
3. Observation Sheet from Observer B in Cycle 1Meeting 1 .............. 164
4. Observation Sheet from Observer A in Cycle 1 Meeting 2 ............. 166
5. Observation Sheet from Observer B in Cycle 1 Meeting 2 ............. 168
6. Observation Sheet from Observer A in Cycle 2 .............................. 170
7. Observation Sheet from Observer B in Cycle 2 .............................. 172
F. Field Notes Results ................................................................................ 174
1. Field Notes Cycle 1 Meeting 1 ........................................................ 175
2. Field Notes Cycle 1 Meeting 2 ........................................................ 178
3. Field Notes Cycle 2 ......................................................................... 180
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xvii
G. Questionnaire Results ............................................................................ 182
1. Questionnaire Result of the Preliminary Study ............................. 183
2. Questionnaire Result in Cycle 1..................................................... 185
3. Questionnaire Result in Cycle 2..................................................... 189
H. Writing Rubric Result............................................................................ 194
1. Students‟ Achievement in the Preliminary Study .......................... 195
2. Students‟ Achievement in Cycle 1 ................................................. 196
3. Students‟ Achievement in Cycle 2 ................................................. 197
I. Samples of Students‟ Draft and Revised Draft ..................................... 198
1. Sample of Students‟ Draft in Cycle 1 ............................................ 199
2. Sample of Students‟ Revised Draft in Cycle 1 .............................. 200
3. Sample of Students‟ Draft in Cycle 2 ............................................ 201
4. Sample of Students‟ Revised Draft in Cycle 2 .............................. 202
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
1
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
In this chapter, the researcher discusses the introduction of the study.
There are six sub-chapters which are explained in this chapter. Those sub-chapters
are the research background, research problems, problem limitation, research
objectives, research benefits, and definition of terms used in this study.
A. Research Background
English is one of subjects in Indonesia. It is the first foreign language that
has to be taught in every school in Indonesia. To master English, students must be
involved into four skills in it, i.e. listening, speaking, reading, and writing (Bright
& McGregor, 1973). Students‟ mastery in English could be measured through
their performances of productive skills. Students‟ performances in speaking and
writing skills, as the productive skills, indicate their achievements in learning
English. Students are expected not only speaking fluently but also writing
properly. Like speaking skills as a direct communication, writing skills are the
forms of indirect communication which need knowledge and experience to be
mastered by students (Darmadi, 1996).
Writing is a complex skill therefore it is considered as the most difficult
skill in language to be learnt. Students have to learn complex knowledge in
writing in order to be able to produce good writing. Nunan (2003) states “Writing
is the mental work of inventing ideas, thinking about how to express them, and
organizing them into statements and paragraphs that will be clear to a reader”
(p.88). Therefore, as a productive skill, it can be said that writing is one of four
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
2
skills in English which has an important role in students‟ ability. It is also said by
Tiedt (1989), “…of all the language skills, writing is the most difficult and it is a
hard work.” (p.6). The students will produce a long process to obtain the good
writing products which require mental works in writing and the knowledge of
English. The students have to deal with the mental works in writing such as
finding ideas, expressing the ideas, organizing statements and paragraphs which
will be supported by the knowledge of English such as grammar, idiom, and
vocabulary that have been taught by the teacher.
In the Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP) or curriculum 2006,
it is explained English as a subject for junior high school should elaborate several
kinds of texts. Those texts are mentioned in the competency standard (Standar
Kompetensi) and the basic competence (Kompetensi Dasar) of the curriculum. To
be particular, the texts that must be taught for eight graders of junior high school
are descriptive, recount, and narrative. To master the writing skills of those texts,
Feez and Joyce (2002) define text-based approach or genre- based approach as the
effective approach which is employed based on the need of English language
teachers to teach whole texts. In order to achieve the writing competence, text-
based approach helps the teachers to teach students by using its stages in
composing the texts.
This research was conducted in the school in which used curriculum 2006
or KTSP. Therefore, the researcher used the protocol of curriculum 2006.
Meanwhile, after conducting the research, the curriculum has changed. Every
school in Indonesia starts to employ the newest curriculum, curriculum 2013.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
3
Curriculum 2013 is the new curriculum which is established in the academic year
2013/ 2014 and also the developing of the last curriculum (Fadlillah, 2014). The
change of curriculum 2013 basically focuses on improving and balancing between
soft skills and hard skills. Moreover, curriculum 2013 requires the soft skills and
hard skills could be balanced and be simultaneous to be applied in daily life
(Fadlillah, 2014). Mulyasa (2013) states that through balancing the hard skills
(knowledge) and soft skills, students become more productive, creative,
innovative, and affective.
In the curriculum 2006 (KTSP), there are two parts namely competency
standard (standar kompetensi) and the basic competence (kompetensi dasar). The
competency standard, in the curriculum 2006 (KTSP), is made based on the
subjects. In other words, the competency standard is made after deciding the
competency standard which is different for each subject. On the contrary, the
competency standard which is changed into main competency (kompetensi inti) in
the curriculum 2013 is made for all subjects. In other words, the main competency
is made first before deciding the competency standard so that all subjects have the
same main competency. Basically, curriculum 2006 (KTSP) and curriculum 2013
has the same basic competences. The topic of materials which are taught in the
curriculum 2006 and curriculum 2013 are same. To be particular, though the
curriculum has changed, narrative text as one of topics in the English subject is
still taught for eight grade of junior high school.
The researcher conducted this research in SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta. The
rationale was the researcher had experiences in teaching English in this school.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
4
The researcher as the English teacher of extracurricular activity in this school
taught students of eight grades who become the participants of this research.
While the researcher taught English extracurricular, the researcher observed the
students. Most of the students faced some problems related to the writing skills.
These problems also occurred in the preliminary observation which was
conducted the researcher in the beginning of this research.
Based on the classroom observation which was done once by the
researcher in the preliminary study on April 15th
, 2014, the researcher found that
students VIII F of SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta faced some problems in writing.
First, the researcher observed the teaching- learning process between the English
teacher and the students. The researcher found that the students did not show their
enthusiasm while acquiring the lesson. Second, the researcher also observed the
class condition. The class was not supported by some devices as the media to
teach the students such as Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) or Overhead Projector
(OHP). There were only two whiteboards as the media which were available in
the class. The students and the teacher also used handbooks which covered the
materials. The lack of media usage also influenced the students‟ attention which
will affect their understanding of the lessons.
Moreover, while the teacher asked the students to compose recount text,
most of the students had difficulties when they tried to write something in
English. They needed much time to start writing the ideas. Also, when they
already had the ideas, they found difficulties in organizing them into a good story.
Furthermore, they had limited English vocabulary. Meanwhile, they were asked to
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
5
be able to produce sentences. They also faced difficulties in the use of simple past
tense and minimum requirements. It can be said that the result of their task in
writing was not good enough.
Based on the problems which were found, the researcher conducted this
study. The problems faced by class VIII F SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta lead the
researcher to propose a technique for developing their writing skills. The
researcher chose picture series as the way to improve students‟ writing ability.
The reason was that picture series has many advantages to teach writing narrative
texts. It is stated by Kreidler (1968) that a series of pictures can be used for
retelling a story. Raimes (1983) adds that pictures are valuable to provide
vocabulary and common language forms. He also adds that pictures bring the
outside world into the classroom in a vividly concrete way. Moreover, Raimes
(1983) adds that a set of parallel pictures– pictures that show a similar scene or
tell a similar story– provides materials that offer guidance in vocabulary,
sentence structure, and organization yet lets the students write about the new
subject matter; in this case the research focuses on narrative writing. It is
expected that by means of picture series, the skill of writing especially writing
narrative text can be improved.
Hence, in this research the researcher will discuss the use of picture series
to teach writing narrative text to class VIII F SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta. Through
Classroom Action Research (CAR), the researcher intends to find the effective
teaching strategy that can be implemented to improve students‟ skills in writing
narrative.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
6
B. Research Problems
In this research, the researcher aims to find out the answer of the problems
below:
1. To what extent does picture series help class VIII F of SMP Negeri 10
Surakarta in writing narrative text?
2. How is the use of picture series implemented in writing narrative text
toward class VIII F of SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta to improve their writing
skills?
C. Problem Limitation
The research, which is intended to describe the improvement of students‟
writing skill by using picture series technique in VIII F Class of SMP Negeri 10
Surakarta, used Classroom Action Research (CAR). The researcher implements
planning, implementing (acting), observing the action and reflecting the data
collected from the teaching and learning process and the students writing product.
The subjects of this research were 26 students of VIII F Class of SMP Negeri 10
Surakarta in academic year 2013/ 2014.
D. Research Objectives
Considering the formulation of the problems, the objectives of this
research are:
1. To figure out how picture series as one of writing technique helps class
VIII F of SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta in writing narrative text.
2. To figure out whether picture series is helpful in teaching writing narrative
text class VIII F of SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
7
E. Research Benefits
There are several benefits of conducting this research to several participants
who are involved in this research.
1. The researcher
By doing this research, the researcher as a practitioner is able to answer the
research problems. Moreover, by conducting classroom action research (CAR),
the researcher obtains and learns new experience in improving students‟ writing
skill. Therefore, it is expected that the researcher as an English teacher become
more creative in discovering the new technique and strategy to teach the students
so that they can achieve the English competences.
2. The English teachers in SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta
After conducting this study, the English teachers in SMP Negeri 10
Surakarta are able to help the students in improving their writing skills. It is
expected that the English teachers are able to facilitate the students by promoting
the other techniques and strategies. Therefore, the students will produce the good
writings in their English subject.
3. Class VIII F students in SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta
By conducting this research, the students are able to improve their skills of
writing. Also, by implementing the technique, the students are expected to enjoy
the writing activities so that they are able to produce the good writings not only
in the narrative text but also in other kinds of writing.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
8
4. The further studies
The researcher also looks that this study can be functional for the further
studies. The results of this research can be used as the data for other researchers
in the same topic in order to get the better improvement of the classroom
practice.
F. Definition of Terms
There are some terms which are used in this research. The terms are
defined to avoid misinterpretation in the meaning. They are explained as follows.
1. Writing Skills in Classroom Action Research
Writing is one of skills that have to be learnt by students in learning
English. As stated by Nunan (2003), “Writing is both physical and mental act.”
(p. 88). Nunan (2003) states that as the physical act, writing is an action of
committing words or ideas to some media whether it is hieroglyphics inked onto
parchment or an e-mail message typed into a computer. As the mental act, Nunan
(2003) states that writing is inventing ideas, thinking about how to express them,
and organizing them into statements and paragraphs. It means that in writing
skills, students have to organize their physical and mental activities. These
activities cannot be separated because one and the other maintain the process of
writing itself.
Nunan (2003) states writing deals with process and product. To produce
the good writing products, students are involved in the process of composing it.
He also says, “Its purpose is both to express and to impress” (p. 88). “To express”
here means that writing is the real work of delivering idea or feeling to the reader.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
9
Meanwhile, “to impress” means that a writing product can affect into the level of
the readers.
As for, “how” to make a good writing, we have to know the process to
work on it so that we can produce a good writing. Also, it can be said that the
effect of writing is not only to influence the writer but also the reader, not only
expressing the real idea but also impressing the reader through the writing results.
2. Teaching Writing in Classroom Action Research
Teaching is a process which is conducted to help the students achieve the
goals. According to Brown (2007), teaching is a superior job because it is a
demanding job. Teaching requires the teachers to do the demanding tasks such as
modifying the approaches, syllabus, techniques and exercises to adapt and
maximize the learning of a class.
Teaching is a powerful job. To be successful in teaching, teachers have to
find the appropriate techniques which can be used in their classroom. Therefore,
teaching is not easy because teachers have to maximize the students‟
understanding in learning certain subjects in order to get the best result.
In addition, to teach writing, a teacher has to know the principles of
teaching writing. According to Nation (2009), there are four principles to teach
writing: meaning – focused input, meaning – focused output, language – focused
learning, and fluency development.
3. Narrative Text
One of the texts that are taught to eight grader students is narrative text.
The basic understanding of narrative text is to tell a story. According to Guzzetti,
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
10
“Narratives are stories that are most often written to entertain and excite the
reader. A story usually has a beginning, a middle, and an end. Narratives have an
internal structure that usually consists of several main components including
characters, setting, theme, plot and resolution” (2002, p. 386.)
Thus, the elements are incorporated in the generic structure of the text
which according to Gerot and Wignell (1995) namely orientation, evaluation,
complication, and resolution.
4. Classroom Action Research
Action research is a research which is conducted to get the information how
the teaching-learning process goes well. According to Mills (2011), “Action
research is any systematic inquiry conducted by teacher researchers, principals,
school conselors, or other stakeholders in teaching/ learning environment to gather
information about how their particular schools operate, how they teach, and how
well their students learn.” (p. 5)
There are many versions of the model action research cycles. In this
research, the researcher will use the Kemmis and McTaggart (1988) cycle model.
The cycle consists of planning, action, observation, and reflection. By conducting
classroom action research, the teachers need to know what is happening in the
classroom, to collect the data, to evaluate the teaching process, and to find the
solution to solve the problems.
5. Picture Series
There are two things which are being discussed in this part. They are the
definitions of picture series and the advantages of picture series in writing.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
11
a. The Definitions of Picture Series
According to Heinich (1982), pictures are photographic, representative of
people, places, and things that are available in the most subject areas and levels
from kindergarten to adults. It is added by Kreidler (1968) that some of the
pictures indicate that something unusual has already happened. Pictures, with
more details of several objects and several people performing different actions,
all relating to the same general themes, can also be used as a device for
simulating compositions. The several actions depicted may allow a sequence of
events.
b. The Advantages of Picture Series in Writing
Pictures can be one of good media to teach writing because they have many
advantages. It is stated by Kreidler (1968) that a series of pictures can be used
for retelling a story. Raimes (1983) insists that pictures are valuable to provide
vocabulary and common language forms. Raimes also adds that pictures bring
the outside world into the classroom in a vividly concrete way. Pictures are
valuable resources because they provide experience in the classroom, necessities
for common language, forms to use in the classroom, variety of tasks, focus of
interest for students.
Furthermore, pictures are very useful to build students‟ imagination of the
story. It is supported by Hobson, as cited by Dunn and Finley (2010, p.34) who
states that the use of images could help the students who given those pictures
which constitute more compact and efficient storage units of ideas, in the pre-
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
12
writing phases. Art offers the illustrations to the students as a way to develop the
ideas of the story.
The researcher guided the students by providing the picture series as one of
teaching media. As stated by Raimes (1983) that a set of parallel pictures–
pictures that show a similar scene or tell a similar story–provides material that
offers guidance in vocabulary, sentence structure, and organization let the
students write about the new subject matter; in this research it focuses on
narrative writing.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
13
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
In this chapter, the researcher presents a discussion on some theories
which constitute the foundation of this research. This chapter is divided into two
major parts: theoretical description and theoretical framework.
In the theoretical description, the researcher discusses the writing skill,
picture series technique, and classroom action research. Meanwhile, the second
part is about the theoretical framework. It will discuss the synthesis and the
summaries of the theories which will be used by the researcher to solve the
problems.
A. Theoretical Description
In the theoretical description, the researcher discusses the theories which
are related to the study. The theories are the writing skill, narrative text, picture
series, and classroom action research. The followings are the explanations of
those theories employed in this research.
1. Writing Skill
Writing skills become the major point discussed in this research. This part
will discuss the theories of writing skills. There are two sub-points related to the
theories, namely the nature of writing and the teaching of writing. The nature of
writing discusses the definition and the process of writing, whereas the teaching
of writing will elaborate the reason why the teachers have to teach writing as one
of skills and the approach of teaching writing
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
14
.
a. The Nature of Writing
Writing is one of the language skills which have to be learnt by students.
Nunan (2003) defines writing as, “physical and mental act.” (p. 88). Furthermore,
Nunan (2003) states that as a physical act, writing is an action of expressing
words or ideas to some media whether it is hieroglyphics inked onto parchment
or an e-mail message typed into a computer. As the mental act, Nunan (2003)
states that writing is inventing ideas followed by thinking about how to express
them and organizing them into statements and paragraphs. According to Elbow
(1998), writing has two skills which deal with mental processes: creating and
criticizing. In other words, writing engages the ability to create the words and the
ideas out and also engages the ability to criticize them in order to decide which
one to be used. In addition, it is also supported by Brown (2007) that writing
“…requires learners to produce a correct written language” (p.335). Brown
(2007) also mentions, “Written products are often the result of thinking, drafting
and revising procedures that require specialized skills…” (2007, p.335). Here, it
can be said that writing is an ability which is engaging with some steps as the
processes in order to be able to produce a good writing product.
To produce a good writing product, the writers have to know the purpose of
writing. Nunan (2003) mentions, “Its purpose is both to express and to impress.”
(p. 88). “To express” here means that writing is the real work of delivering idea
or feeling to the reader, whereas “to impress” means the writing product can
affect the level of the reader. Moreover, Nunan (2003) elaborates that writing
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
15
deals with process and product (2003, p.88). As for how to make a good writing,
we have to deal with the process of working on it so that we can produce a good
writing.
Writing is a complex skill to be mastered by students. Therefore, writing
becomes a quite difficult skill. Tiedt (1989) even says, “…of all the language
skills, writing is the most difficult and it is a hard work.” (p.6). It is also proved
by Elbow (1998), “ There is no hiding the fact that writing well is a complex,
difficult, and time-consuming process” (p.3). Therefore, the teachers and the
students have to deal with the efforts to deliver and master this skill.
In order to produce a good written product, writers or students employ some
steps as the process of writing. It is agreed by Harmer (2004), who states that
“Writing process is the stages a writer goes through in order to produce
something in its final written form” (p.4). Harmer (2004) adds the process is
affected by the content (subject matter) of the writing, type of writing, and the
medium it is written in. It is also supported by Brown, “Written products are
often the result of thinking, drafting and revising procedures that require
specialized skills…” (2007, p. 391).
Harmer (2004) emphasizes the discussion writing process into four main
stages: planning, drafting, editing, and final revision. In the first stage, namely
planning, students plan what they are going to write. Students may start to write
down the preliminary notes of their ideas. Harmer (2004) also suggests three
main issues that are possibly thought by the students in the planning stage; the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
16
purpose of the writing, the audience of the writing, and also the content structure
of the writing.
After planning the ideas, the students go on the drafting stage. In this stage,
students may produce some or many pieces of texts since they try to compose
sentences and paragraphs. Afterwards, the students move to the editing stage in
which they will read through what they have written. Harmer also adds that in
this stage students may need some reflecting and revising which are often done
by the other readers, in this case teachers have an important role to help the
students in making the appropriate revisions.
In the last stage, namely final revision, students may revise their work after
getting the feedback from the teacher. Students may change their writing product
in order to produce the good product of writing.
b. Teaching Writing
Teaching is the main role of teachers to give the students guidance to reach
goals.
1) The Background of Teaching Writing Skill
Teaching is a process in which the teachers deliver the guidance in order to
help the students to reach the goals. According to Acero, Javier, and Castro
(2007), teaching is a process of actions to produce and stimulate learning and
eventually to succed in learning. Teaching is a deliberate process. Teachers have
the important role of setting the planning of the teaching, the process of the whole
teaching, and also the achievement of the teaching. To do a teaching is not easy.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
17
There are many things that should be prepared by teachers to present the whole
process of teaching.
Raimes (1983) states the most important thing to be taught in writing is that
“writing helps our students learn” (p. 3). Furthermore, Raimes rationalizes the
statement by giving three reasons. First, writing strengthens the grammatical
structures, idioms, and vocabulary that have been taught by the teachers. Second,
through writing students have the chance to be adventurous with the language, to
go beyond what they have just learned to say, to take risks. In the other words,
students can build their confidence in writing through having the real experience
on it. Third, when the students write, they reinforce their learning through
getting involved in the new language. It deals with the struggle of the students in
improving their writing skills.
The teachers also must know that writing has the important role to be learnt
by students through the rationales which are stated by Venkateswaran (1995).
According to Venkateswaran (1995, p. 104), they are three reasons for getting
students to write in the classroom (all are direct quotes :
a) Writing helps to solidify the students grasp of vocabulary
and structure and complements the other skills.
b) Appropriacy can be developed only through writing.
c) The goal of writing is to develop the students ability to
write up to the point at which written homework can be
given.
Venkateswaran (1995) also explains the goal of writing into two points:
“Psychologically, students are more impressed by exercise that
are to be written and handed in than by those that are to be
learned. Reallistically, the teacher knows that writing home
work exercises and other written activities help the students to
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
18
acquire the vocabulary and the grammar of the lesson.” ( p.
104)
In writing skills, the principal purpose is getting the students able to write in
the classroom. It is not easy for the teachers to make the students enjoying the
writing activity. Writing is the most difficult and it needs a hard work (Tiedt,
1989). Nevertheless, it becomes the teachers‟job to make the students enjoy their
writing process.
2) The principles of teaching writing
To teach writing, the teachers need some principles of teaching writing in
order to evaluate the writing process whether the students are getting a good range
of opportunities or not. Nation (2009) proposes four principles to teach writing.
They are:
a) Meaning-focused input
According to Nation (2009), in teaching writing the teachers should be
able to lead the students to bring their experience and knowlegde to their
writing. Writing will be successful and meaningful for the students if they
are well prepared for what they are going to write. The students‟ experience
can be brought about by giving them tasks. Nation (2009) states that
students have to experience as many as posible writing tasks. The several
effects of giving tasks in writing skills are (Nation, 2009, p.96):
“ First, it makes sure that learners are not overloaded by having
to think about several different things at the same time. Second,
it allows the learners the chance to concentrate on the part of
the task that they need to learrn. Third, it helps the learners
perform a normal language activity in a normal waywith a high
chance of success.”
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
19
b) Meaning-focused output
This principle is dealing with product. In order to produce a good
product of writing, the students should practice lots of different kinds of
writing. Biber states, “different genres use different writing conventions and
draw on different language features and so it is useful to make sure that
learners are getting writing practice in the range of genres that they will have
to write in” (as cited in Nation, 2003, p. 93-94).
The expected results of this principles are mentioned as follows: First,
the students write with a message-focused purpose. Hence, the students will
get the aim of communicating a message to the reader, and the writer should
have a reader in mind when writing. Second, writing should attract students
and draw on their interests. Third, students should experience a feeling of
success in their writing. Fourth, students should employ writing as an aid to
increase their language knowledge. Fifth, in order to get wider the skill of
writing, students have to master skill in the use of computer to increase the
quality of speed of their writing. Besides, computer provide ways of
providing feedback. Sixth, writing instruction should be considered on
careful analysis such as what the students need to be able to do with writing,
what they can do now, and what they want to do.
c) Language-focused learning
In this principle, there are some points underlined by Nation (2009). The
students should have knowledge about the parts of the writing process and
should be able to discuss them toward their own or others‟ writing. Students
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
20
are also expected to have conscious plans for dealing with the parts of
writing process. The students have to be aware of clarity and fluency in
producing the writing script. Furthermore, the teachers should provide and
arrange feedbacks in order to encourage and improve the students‟ writings.
d) Fluency development
Nation (2009) states this principle enlightens about writing speed.
Students should increase their writing speed so that they are able to write
very simple material in a reasonable speed. Fluency development can be
done through repetitive activities of writing.
3) Teaching Technique
In order to help students to reach the goals in writing, the teachers are
supposed to find the technique in delivering the lesson. According to Raimes
(1983), to teach writing the teachers have to know the purposes of the techniques
used in teaching writing:
1. To communicate with a reader
2. To express ideas without the pressure of face-to-face
communication
3. To explore the subject
4. To record experience
5. To become familiar with the conventions of written English
discourse (text)
According to Dhand (2008), the techniques of teaching are activities which
are used day to day for a particular lesson. These activities or techniques affect to
the learners‟ understanding of the process. Moreover, the techniques used must
have the potential to enhance and enrich the learning experience.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
21
Furthermore, Dhand (2008) adds the teachers possibly will find, with
experience, more than a single technique. The teachers will experience the most
appropriate and effective technique by practicing some techniques first. The
successful teaching techniques depend on the successful planning also.
2. Text – Based Approach
In this section, the researcher discusses the approach that is used in this
study. There are two major parts in this section: the definition of the text–based
approach and also the implementing of the text–based approach.
a. The Definition of Text – Based Approach
In this research, the researcher uses text–based approach. Text-based
approach which has also been known as genre approach is an approach which is
employed based on the need of English language teacher to teach whole texts.
According to Feez and Joyce (2002), primarily concern of the text–based
approach is what learners do with the language. Moreover, Feez and Joyce (2002)
state, “A text–based approach is concerned with units of discourse called texts”
(p.4).
Moreover, Feez and Joyce (2002) explain that this approach is based on an
approach which involves teaching about structures and grammatical features of
spoken and written texts explicitly, relating the spoken and written texts to the
social and cultural contexts of its use, developing units of work which focus on
building the skills in relation to the whole texts, arranging the guided practice to
the students as they develop language skills for meaningful communication based
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
22
on the whole texts. In this research, the researcher employs this approach since the
researcher has to teach the students who deal with several kinds of texts.
b. The Implementation of Text-based Approach
The implementation of text-based approach in this research is based on the
teaching and learning cycle from Feez and Joyce (2002). The cycle consists of
five stages.
1) Building the context
In this stage, firstly, the students are introduced to the social context of the
text-type being learned; building their knowledge of the topic of the texts given.
Secondly, the students explore the features of the general cultural context and the
social purposes of the texts given. In this stage, the students can be invited to
compare between the text learned and the other related texts.
2) Modeling and deconstructing the text
In this stage, the students discussed the texts given. They investigate the
structural pattern and language features of the model texts. The teachers start
using the technique in teaching the text. The activities in this stage are proposed
by Feez and Joyce (2002, p.30):
“Text-level activities: focusing on cohesive devices such as sets
of related lexical items, conjunction, modality, reference e.g.
semantic maps, vocabulary networks, cloze, transparency
overlays, etc.
Clause-level activities: presentation and practice activities
relating to the grammatical features of the text.
Expression-level activities: oral-aural, pronunciation, decoding,
spelling, handwriting or typing practice as needed for the use of
the text- type.”
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
23
3) Joint construction of the text
The students are given chances to contribute to the construction of the text
examples. The teachers reduce the contribution of the text in order to prepare the
students to the next stage: independent stage. In this stage, the activities proposed
by Feez & Joyce (2002, p.30) are (all in direct quotation):
a. Teacher questioning, discussing and editing whole construction, then
scribing onto board or OHT
b. Skeleton text
c. Jigsaw and information gap activities
d. Small group construction of texts
e. Dictogloss
f. Self-assessment and peer- assessment activities
4) Independent construction of the text
In this stage, the students work individually. They compose the texts which
have learnt individually. The students make their drafts as their individual writing
product.
5) Linking to the related texts
In this stage, the activities invite the students to reflect what they have learnt
in the text discussed during the lesson. The activities proposed by Feez and Joyce
(2002, p.31) in this stage are: (in direct quotation)
a. Comparing the use of the text-type across different fields
b. Researching other text-types used in the same field
c. Role- playing what happens if the same text-type is used by people
with different roles and relationships
d. Comparing spoken and written models of the same text-type
e. Researching how a key language feature used in this text-type is
used in other text-types.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
24
3. Narrative Text
In this section, the researcher discusses the definition, the communicative
purposes, the generic structure, and the grammatical features of narrative text.
a. The Definition of Narrative Text
Doyle, Goh, and Zhang (2004) state that narratives are storis which consist
of sequence of events. “Narratives have many complex structures although they
share many of basic future we have identified in recount” (p.60). In other words,
narrative is a text that tells a story rather than tells the series of past experience;
this is why narrative differs from recount text. Moreover, narrative consists of
more complex generic structures than recount.
According to Guzzetti, “Narratives are stories that are most often written to
entertain and excite the reader. A story usually has a beginning, a middle, and an
end as a goal based. Narratives have an internal structure that usually consists of
several main components including characters, setting, theme, plot and resolution”
(2002, p.386.)
Guzzetti (2002) states that the examples of narratives are short stories,
novels, folktales, tall tales, myths, fables,legends, fantasies, and science fiction.
b. The Communicative Purpose of Narrative Text
The basic purpose is to amuse the reader. It is supported by Gerot and
Wignell (1995) who state that the purpose of narrative texts is to relate an
amusing or unusual experience in an entertaining way. Besides, Knapp and
Watkins (2005) state that narrative texts have purpose to entertain the readers.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
25
It is also used as a powerful social role. This second purpose of Knapp and
Watkins relate to the purpose which is stated by Doyle et al. (2004) that narrative
texts have didactic and satirical purpose. It can be used as educational text.
c. Generic Structure of Narrative Text
In composing narrative text, the writers (students) have to understand the
structures of the text. The generic structures of narrative text according to Gerot
and Wignell (1995) are:
1) Orientation
This part sets the scene and introduces the participants of the story which
are usually specific and individual. Besides the participants, in this part the story
shows the setting (time and place) of the story. In narratives, the orientation
indicates with imaginary time sequencer such as once upon a time, long time
ago, etc.
2) Evaluation
This part is a stepping back to evaluate the plight. The problems are faced
but only in the surface. The climax just started to rise up in the story.
3) Complication
In this step, the crises arise. There are some problems which are faced by
the characters. It can be more than one problem that happens within the story. In
this part, there is a climax of the story. It can be more than one climax happened
in the story.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
26
4) Resolution
In this part, the crises are resolved for the better or for the worse situation.
This part also presents that the writer shows how the problem solving and the end
of the story. There are several moral values or life values which can be learned
form the story.
d. Grammatical Features of Narrative Text
According to Doyle et al. (2004), the grammatical features of narrative
are: using past tense to describe the events, using action verbs, using adjective to
describe the characters and the places, using direct and reported speech to present
the dialogue.
4. Picture Series
In this part, the researcher used several theories which are related to picture
series.
a. The Nature of Picture Series
Pictures series are usually represents of objects and places which are
presented in series arrangement depicting sequence events in the same theme.
According to Heinich (1982), pictures are photographic, representative of people,
places, and things that are available in most subject areas and levels from
kindergarten to adults. Kreidler (1968) states that a number of pictures indicates
that something unusual have already happened. Pictures with more details
several objects, several people performing different actions, all relating to the
same general themes can also be useful devices for simulating compositions. The
several actions depicted may allow a sequence of events.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
27
b. The Advantages of Picture Series
Pictures can be one of good media to teach writing because they have
many advantages. As stated by Kreidler (1968) that a series of pictures can be
used for retelling of a story. Raimes (1983) insists that pictures are valuable to
provide vocabulary and common language forms. Moreover, pictures bring the
outside world into the classroom in a vivid and concrete way. Pictures are
valuable resources since they provide:
1. A shared experience in the classroom
2. A need for common language forms to use in the classroom
3. A variety of tasks
4. A focus of interest for students
Besides, Hobson, as cited by Dunn and Finley ( 2010, p. 34) states that the
use of images could help promote children‟s writing given those pictures to be
more compact and efficient storage units of ideas in the pre-writing phases. Art
offers the illustration as a way to develop the ideas of the story. Fu and Shelton,
as cited by Dunn and Finley (2010, p.34) tell that the teachers could use picture
series technique in order to help the students to illustrate the initial story ideas
which helped to promote their confidence, stamina, and writing skills.
Moreover, Raimes (1983) adds that a set of parallel pictures – pictures that
show a similar scene or tell a similar story – provides material that offers
guidance in vocabulary, sentence structure, and organization yet lets the students
write about the new subject matter; in this research the focus is on narrative
writing.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
28
5. Classroom Action Research
This part will elaborate the classroom action research theories. There are
four things discussed in this part: the definitions, the aims, the characteristics,
and the model of classroom action research.
a. Definitions of Classroom Action Research
There are some definitions which are stated by some experts. According to
Kemmis as cited by Hopkins (2008, p. 48), action research is a form of self-
reflective enquiry undertaken by the participants in a social circle. Burns (2010)
says, “It is related to the ideas of „reflective practice‟ and „the teacher as a
researcher‟” (p. 2). Furthermore, Mills (2011, p. 5) insists that action research is
any systematic inquiry conducted by the teacher researchers to gather
information about the ways that their particular school operates, how they teach,
and how well their students learn. Richards (2005) says, “Action research refers
to a systemic approach to carry out investigations and collecting information that
is designed to illuminate an issue or problem and to improve classroom practice”
(p.171). Moreover, Richards (2005) says that action research emphasizes not
only to seek the benefits of involving the process of the cycles but also “to
develop a deeper understanding of many issues in teaching and learning as well
as acquire useful classroom investigation skills” (p.171).
In other words, action research is an appropriate research which can be
conducted by the teachers as the researchers towards their own classroom in
order to gain sufficient information of the condition faced by the classroom.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
29
Subsequently, the teachers also find the solutions to overcome the problems
faced. It also becomes the reflective way to the teachers as the researchers.
b. Aims of Classroom Action Research
Ary, Jacobs, and Sorensen (2010) insist that action research aims to
interpret events and to enable individuals or groups of people to formulate
acceptable solutions to local problems, to seek viable, sustainable, effective
solutions to common problems.
Hendricks, as cited by Ary et al. (2010), states that the aim of classroom
action research is to improve classroom practice in the school.
c. Steps and Characteristics of Classroom Action Research
Mills (2011) states action research is a research which underlines how the
teachers as the researchers are gathering as much as possible information about
their classroom. “The information is gathered with the goals of gaining insight,
developing reflective practice, effective positive changes in the school
environment, and improving student outcomes and the lives of those involved”
(p.5). Consequently, action research offers four basic stages based on Fraenkel
and Wallen (2009) namely:
1) Identifying the research question
In the first stage, Fraenkel and Wallen state that an individual or group
needs to carefully examines the situation and identify the problems. Moreover,
“Action research projects are (usually) quite narrow in scope.” (p. 571). The
problems or issues which occur must be clear. It will help the teacher to examine
the study. Frankel and Wallen add this research will be suitable if the teachers or
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
30
others involved in education to make it better, improve their practice, deal with a
troublesome issue, or correct something that is not working (2009).
2) Gathering the necessary information
This stage deals with the method of collecting the data after identifying the
problems. Fraenkel and Wallen (2009) mention the possible method to be used:
“Experiments, surveys, causal–comparative studies, observations, interviews,
analysis of documents, ethnographies.” (p. 571)
3) Analyzing and interpreting the information
The third is the following step of the previous step. After collecting the data,
the teacher will analyze and interpret the data. The importance of this step is that
the data which are examined should resolve the research questions or problems in
which this research was conducted (Fraenkel & Wallen, 2009).
4) Developing an action plan
In this step, the teacher as a researcher conducts the plan of the action to
implement the changes into the findings. It becomes the control of the teacher in
implementing the actions toward the classroom.
Action research has some characteristics. According to Ary et al. (2010,
p.514), there are three main characteristics of action research (all in direct
quotes):
1. The research is situated in a local context and focused on
a local issue.
2. The research is conducted by and for practitioner.
3. The research results in an action or a change implemented
by the practitioner in the context.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
31
d. Model of Classroom Action Research
Kemmis and McTaggart(1988) assert, “Action research is a dynamic process
in which these four moments are to be understood not as static steps, complete in
themselves, but rather as moments in the action research spiral of planning,
action, observing, and reflecting” (p.15). The researcher uses the spiral steps of
Kemmis and McTaggartas presented in the Figure 2.1. as the guideline to
conduct the classroom action research.
Figure 2.1: Kemmis & McTaggart’s cycle of Classroom Action Research
(From Kemmis and McTaggart, 1988)
1) Planning
Kemmis and McTaggart (1988) state that the plan should help the
researchers “…to go beyond present constraints and to empower them to act
more appropriately in the situation and more effectively as an educator” (p.12).
In this step, the researcher starts to make clear plans after knowing the problems.
The researcher considers the objects‟ strengths and weaknesses in order to decide
the action or strategy that can effectively overcome the problem obtained.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
32
2) Action and Observation
Kemmis and McTaggart (1988) affirm action step to be used as a platform
for the further development. Furthermore, action should be synchronized with the
plan which was done in the previous step. This step explores the researcher to
apply the strategy in order to overcome the problems which happened. Action
stage will be done simultaneously with the observation stage. The
implementation of action cannot be separated from the observation.
The importance of observation step is to collect the evidences of the action
in order to able to evaluate it thoroughly. The researcher observes the situation of
the environment and tries to analyze the data. Kemmis and McTaggart (1988)
say, “Observation has function of documenting the effects of critically informed
action– it looks forward, providing the basis for reflection...” (p.13). Observation
should be responsive, open-eyed, and open- minded.
According to Foster (1996), observation involves receiving data through the
sense, processing, interpreting, and combinating the information in a complex
way. Moreover, Foster (1996) says that through observing, the researchers obtain
valuable information by soliciting the knowledge, experiences, and ideas.
3) Reflection
Kemmis and McTaggart (1988) affirm, “Reflection has an evaluative
aspect– it asks action researchers to weigh their experience– to judge whether the
effects were desirable and to suggest ways of proceeding” (p.13). After the
researcher getting the results of the analysis, the researcher tries to assess what
she/he has done by the object and propose the next action for the next cycle.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
33
B. Theoretical Framework
English, as the first foreign language which should be taught in Indonesia,
has four skills; listening, reading, speaking, and writing. In order to use English as
a language that can be applied by the students well, the researcher focuses on the
productive skills which are shown in students‟ performances. One of the skills
that directly showed students‟ performances is writing skill. As stated by Tiedt
(1989) that writing skill is the most difficult skill and needs hard work, it is alsi
faced by the students. The students consider writing is difficult skill to be
mastered.
Referring to the purpose of the curriculum, the students should be able to
write various types of text. Narrative is one of the texts that have to be taught in
junior high school level. Based on the observation, Class VIII F students in SMP
Negeri 10 Surakarta faced difficulty in writing narrative text. The thought that
writing is difficult skill to be learnt lead them to face some problems because of
the lack of English competence. In the preliminary observation, the researcher
found several problems encountered by the students such as grammar, vocabulary,
mechanics, fluency (style and quality of expressions), and form (organization). As
a result, the students‟ performance in writing text is not satisfying enough.
The problems in writing faced by class VIII F students in SMP Negeri 10
Surakarta motivate the researcher to conduct the action research. The researcher
plans to conduct classroom action research (CAR). The purpose of conducting the
classroom action research (CAR) is that to answer the research problems and to
improve classroom practice (Ary et al., 2010; Richard, 2005; Kemmis &
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
34
McTaggart, 1988). There are four stages to conduct CAR stated by Kemmis and
McTaggart (1988, p.15) the dynamic and complementary process, namely:
planning, action, observation, and reflection. Specifically, the researcher conducts
CAR based on Kemmis and McTaggart‟s cycle model as presented in the Figure
2.1. The researcher does the cycle twice. Therefore, there are two cycles which
are done in this research.
To overcome the problem, the researcher offers to use picture series to
teach writing narrative text. Picture series is chosen as the problem solving,
knowing that it provides many advantages. As the researcher stated above,
according to Raimes (1983), pictures are valuable to provide vocabulary and
common language forms. Besides, Raimes also states that the use of picture series
is really helpful, because it provides: experiences in the classroom, the need for
common language forms to use in the classroom, a variety of tasks, and also a
focus of interest for students. Picture series provide a number of pictures with its
several objects, several characters performing different actions which all relating
to the same general themes. I t can be helpful for the teacher to be used as device
to teach composition of texts (Kreidler, 1968). The use of picture series also
motivates the students to produce words (vocabulary). Therefore, they are guided
to produce sentences in good structure then lead they organize the idea into a good
story (Dunn & Finley, 2010; Raimes, 1983).
In order to improve the classroom practice, the researcher employs
instruments as the tools to obtain the evidences of this study. By using the
evidences, the researcher could reflect the practices whether they are satisfactory
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
35
or not. The researcher as a practitioner of the classroom action research (CAR)
will improve her practice if the results are not satisfactory based on the reflection
because the goal of the classroom action research is to implement the action and
reflect of the action so that the classroom practice improved (Ary et al, 2010;
Burns, 2010; Richards, 2005).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
36
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
In this chapter, the researcher discusses the research methodology. The
researcher divides this chapter into several sections. The sections are the research
method (method which was used in this research), research setting (when and
where the research was conducted), research participants (who were involved in
the research), instruments and data gathering technique (what the data were and
how the data were collected), data analysis technique (how the data was
analyzed), and also research procedure (how the research was conducted).
A. Research Method
In this section, the researcher discussed the method which was employed
in this study. Based on the problems which were found in class VIII F of SMP
Negeri 10 Surakarta, the researcher conducted this study to find out to what extent
the use of picture series helps the students to write narrative texts and how picture
series is implemented toward the students. Richards (2005) says that action
research refers to a systemic approach in carrying out investigations and
collecting information which is designed to overcome an issue or problem and to
improve classroom practice. Therefore, the researcher applied classroom action
research (CAR) methodology to overcome the questions formulated in the study.
The researcher intentionally designed several steps to collect the data in order to
solve the problems faced by the students.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
37
The researcher adopted the Kemmis and McTaggart‟s research model of
Classroom Action Research (1988). In this model, the researcher implemented
four steps for each cycle. There are planning, action, observation, and reflecting.
The researcher conducted two cycles in this research.
In this classroom action research, the researcher collected data form the
students. The researcher needed research instruments in collecting the data. The
researcher used both qualitative and quantitative instruments in collecting the
data. The researcher used data triangulation technique to analyze the data
gathered.
B. Research Setting
This research was conducted in SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta in the even
semester of the academic year of 2013/ 2014 from April to June 2014. There
were two cycles which were applied in this research. Cycle one was conducted in
two meetings. Cycle two was conducted in one meeting. The researcher
conducted the research with the procedure which agreed between both sides: the
researcher and the school.
C. Research Participants
The participants, who were involved in this research as the population,
were the teacher and the students of SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta. They are all the
members of SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta who deal with English.
1. The teachers
There were three English teachers in SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta. The
researcher took one teacher who was also the English class teacher of VIII F. The
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
38
English teacher as the participant of this research gave the opinions and
suggestions about the technique of picture series in writing activity. The
researcher asked her comments on the observation sheets of each cycle.
2. The students
The researcher was conducted in SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta in VIII F class
in the academic year 2013/2014. The VIII F class consisted of 26 students. There
were 12 girls and 14 boys in VIII F class. They constituted the participants of this
research. Based on the preliminary research, the researcher found that the
students got difficulties in writing skill. It became the basic aim of this research
to overcome the problems by finding the solutions to be applied in the classroom.
D. Instruments and Data Gathering Technique
This section elaborates the instruments which were employed in the
classroom action research in order to collect the data. The instruments were
observation sheet, field notes, questionnaire, interview, and also students‟ draft in
writing. These five kinds of instruments were chosen because of their
effectiveness and efficiency. The following is the table of the used instruments in
this research.
Table 3.1 Table of Instruments and Data Collected
Instruments Data Collected
Time
Preliminary
Study Cycle 1 Cycle 2
Observation
checklist
(Self Reflection)
Teacher‟s activities
and
students‟ activities
April 15th,
2014
Meeting one:
April 24th,
2014
Meeting two:
April 29th,
2014
May 13th,
2014
Field Notes Teacher‟s activities April 15th, Meeting one: May 13
th,
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
39
and students‟ activities 2014 April 24th,
2014
Meeting two:
April 29th,
2014
2014
Questionnaire Students‟ perception
of the materials
April 15th,
2014
April 29th,
2014
May 13th,
2014
Interview The detail data of
students‟ perception - -
May 14th,
2014
Students‟ Drafts
Students‟ Revised
Written
Students‟ score in
their drafts of
narrative texts.
Students‟ score in
their final narrative
texts.
April 15th,
2014
-
Meeting one:
April 24th,
2014
Meeting two:
April 29th,
2014
May 13th, 2014
May 13th,
2014
May 19th,
2014
1. Observation checklist
Observation is used to know the situation happened in the classroom during
the implementation. Observation is very important in conducting this research to
gather information of what happens during the teaching- learning process.
According to Morison, the researcher is able to gather data on:
a. The physical setting (e.g. the physical environment and its
organization)
b. The human (e.g. the organization of people, the
characteristic and makeup of the group or individual being
who is/ are observed)
c. The interactional setting (e.g. the interaction that are taking
place, formal, informal, verbal, non-verbal)
d. The program setting (e.g. the resources and their
organization, pedagogic style, and curricula)
(as cited in Cohen, Manion, and Morisson, 2000, p. 305)
The importance of the observation is also stated by Koshy (2005) that through an
observation sheet we can record behavior patterns and the number of actions and
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
40
interactions. Observation checklist is also used to gain any feedback and comment
from the observers toward the teaching and learning process. In addition, the
following are the advantages of employing observation for the research study
according to Creswell (2009, p. 179)
1. Researcher has a first-hand experience with the participant.
2. Researcher can record information as occurs.
3. Unusual aspects can be noticed during observation.
4. Useful in exploring topics that may be uncomfortable for
participants to discuss.
Thus, by using the observation sheets, the researcher expects that she can
collect as many data as possible. The form of observation sheet which is used by
the researcher is checklist form. According to Sloan and Sloan (2013), “Checklists
should be not too board. It is better to have a narrow focus at any one time and
observe more frequently than to try to cover too many areas of observation”
(p.23). The observation checklists will be in the form for observing teacher‟s
activities and students‟ activities. The teacher‟s activities observation checklist
will be used for the researcher‟s self-reflection toward the activities given to the
students. Meanwhile, the students‟ activities observation checklist will be used to
obtain the information from the students when the researcher implements the
action.
Moreover, the researcher asked for help from two “peer- observers”
(Zepeda, 2014, p. 51). The term “peer- observer” was used to represent the other
observers who invited during the teaching and learning process in order to collect
the data. According to Zepeda (2014), “The peer observer helps the teacher look
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
41
at why the focus is important and what types of information about his/ her practice
would help bring into “focus” the area being analyzed” (p.51).
Furthermore, the term of “peer review” (Norton, 2013, p. 143) emphasizes
on the method of peer-observer. According to Norton (2013), “A peer review
evaluation is the method of having one or more teachers evaluates a teacher‟s
performance. The term peer implies that the evaluator will be an individual who
has similar teaching responsibilities as the teacher being evaluated” (p. 143).
Therefore, the researcher asked for help from the English teacher of class VIIF
SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta and also a student of English Language Education
Study Program (ELESP) of Sanata Dharma University.
2. Field Notes
Field notes are used to know the teaching-learning process during the
implementation. The researcher uses field notes as the tool to help the researcher
to reflect on the condition of teaching-learning process. Therefore, the researcher
thinks that field notes are helpful to reflect the implementation. The same view is
also emphasized by Tomal (2010) who states that field notes are very useful
because the researcher could collect the information by observing the phenomena
in its natural setting, such as a classroom or school. Through the field notes, the
researcher gets the report of the observation and the reflections about whether the
teaching and learning process is done well or not. In this research, the researcher
asked for help to the class teacher and one student of ELESP of Sanata Dharma
University to make the field notes based on their observation during the
implementation.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
42
3. Questionnaire
In this research, the researcher employed questionnaire as one of
instruments to obtain the data. The researcher distributed questionnaires to all
students of class VIII F. According to McKay (2002), a questionnaire is a set of
written questions that deal with particular topic. There are three types of
questionnaire according to Burns (1999): closed items, scale items, and also
open-ended items. The form of the questionnaire which is employed in this
research was scale items.
The researcher made the questionnaire items through presenting
statements which needed response in the form of agreement and disagreement.
The respondents give the responses based on the agreement and disagreement of
the questionnaire items using Likert scale. McDonough and McDonough (1997)
say, “One familiar type, the Likert Scale, presents not questions but statements
and asks for degrees of agreement” (p.176).
Furthermore, the researcher also employed the central tendency to
analyze the questionnaire result. Brown and Rogers (2002) state, “Central
tendency, the trend of a set of numbers that clusters around a particular value, is a
convenient way if summarizing data of nominal categories such as Likert scale”
(p.74). Moreover, Boone (2012: 12) states that:
Likert scale data are analyzed at the interval measurement scale. Likert
scale items are created by calculating a composite score (sum or mean)
from four or more items; therefore, the composite score for likert scales
should be analyzed at the interval measurement scale. Descriptive statistics
recommended for interval scale items include the mean for central
tendency.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
43
According to the statement, the researcher aimed to use the nominal data
which would be measured using the mean of central tendency and categorized
using the interval scale. The results would be presented in the form of
description. Therefore, the researcher employed the table as the form and the
formula to measure the data as follow:
Table 3.2 Table Result of Questionnaire
No. Statements Frequency of Points of Agreement Central Tendency
1 2 3 4 N Mn
N = Number of respondents
Mn = Mean
The formulation to get the mean score of the data:
X = n x (points of agreement)
x = the total scores
n = number of the respondents who answer the certain statement
Mn =
= The total of all scores
In the data analysis, the researcher used three kinds of criteria because
there were three different topics in the questionnaire. The following table shows
the list of the criteria:
Table 3.3 Table of Criteria of Total Mean Score
Topic Range Meaning
1
5.00 – 8.75
8.76 – 12.50
12.51 – 16.25
16.26 – 20.00
Useless
Less useless
Useful
Very useful
2 6.00 – 13.50 Very low
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
44
13.51 – 21.00
21.00 – 28.50
28.51 – 36.00
Low achievement
High achievement
Very high achievement
3
4.00 – 7.00
7.01 – 10.00
10.01 – 13.00
13.01 – 16.00
Very low
Low
High
Very high
4. Interview
In this instrument, the researcher collected the data orally with the
students. Cannel and Kahn state the definition of interview as follows:
“The research interview has been defined as „a two-person
conversation initiated by the interviewer for the specific purpose
of obtaining research- relevant information, and focused on
context specified by research objectives of systematic
description, prediction, or explanation” (as cited in Cohen, et al.,
2000, p. 267).
To obtain the data which could not be seen orally, the researcher employed
interview as one of the instruments. This instrument was used to support other
instruments which had the written result. Patton states:
“We interviewed people to find out from them those things we
cannot directly observe. We cannot observe feelings, thoughts,
and intentions. We cannot observe behaviors that took place at
some previous point in time. We cannot observe how people
have organized the world and the meanings they attach to what
goes on in the world. We have to ask people questions about
those things” (as cited in Fraenkel & Wallen, 2009, p. 446)
Moreover, according to Cohen, et al. (2000, p.268), there are three
purposes of conducting a research interview. First, it can be used as the principal
means of gathering information of the research objectives. Here, the researcher
could measure what the students know, what the students like and dislike, and
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
45
what the students think toward the specific purpose which was being obtained in
the research. Second, interview can be used to test the hypotheses or to suggest
the new one, also as an explanatory tool to help identify variables and
relationships. Third, interview can be employed as the combination with other
methods in research undertaking. Moreover, Kerlinger states, “Interview might
be used to follow unexpected results or to validate other methods, or to go deeper
into the motivations of respondents and their reasons for responding as they do”
(as cited in Cohen et al., 2000, p.268). In this research, the researcher used
interview to get the validity of questionnaire. Interview was used as the
convincing instruments of the questionnaires‟ result. It means that the researcher
got the data from questionnaire and then followed by checking the validity of the
answers or responses the researcher used interview.
In conducting the interview, the researcher needs the respondents.
According to Cohen et al. (2000), there are several factors that can be used as the
considerations to choose the respondents. One of those factors is “the
respondents‟ level of education” (p. 274). Therefore, in this research, the
interview involved five students of class VIII F. The students were chosen based
on the level of education. The researcher used the scores of the students‟ drafts in
cycle two to choose the students. Two of the students were chosen because they
had low ability in the writing narrative text since their drafts‟ results did not
reach the passing grade. Whereas, other two of the students were chosen because
they had high ability in writing narrative texts since their drafts‟ results in cycle
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
46
two reached the passing grade. One of the students was chosen since the score
was slightly over the passing grade.
The researcher conducted this interview in the form of “semi-structured
interview”. According Fraenkel and Wallen (2009), semi-structured interview is
a type of interview which its form is verbal questionnaire. It is explained that,
“Rather formal, it consists of a series of questions designed to elicit specific
answers from respondents” (Fraenkel & Wallen, 2009, p. 446). Moreover,
Fraenkel and Wallen explain that this type of interview is considered as the best
type conducted in the research. “…as they tend to shape responses to the
researcher‟s perceptions of how things are. They (structured and semi-structured
interviews) are most useful for obtaining information to test a specific hypothesis
that the researcher has in mind” (Fraenkel & Wallen, 2009, p.46). Therefore, the
researcher chose semi-structured interview in order to obtain information which
support the results of other instruments.
5. Students’ Drafts
The students‟ drafts became the major source of the data in this research.
According to Burns (1999), students‟ drafts as determined as students‟ written
texts is a source of documents readily available to all language teachers.
Students‟ drafts which were done both individually and in group would be the
major data of this research. The researcher asked each student to make two
individual drafts and two group drafts of writing narrative text during the whole
research. Burns (1999) states that the students‟ writing texts help the researcher
assess their progress in writing. Thus, the researcher used the students‟ drafts to
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
47
get more detailed information of the improvement of students‟ writing skills in
composing narrative text. Therefore, to know the improvement of the students
writing skill and to know the problems encountered during the implementation,
the researcher used writing scoring rubric. This scoring rubric was used to assess
all of the srudents‟ writings of this research.
The following is the scoring rubric which was used in this research, taken
from Anderson as cited in Hughes (1989, p. 91-93).
Table 3.4 Analytic Scoring Rubric for Writing Ability
Grammar
6. Few (if any) noticeable errors of grammar or word order.
5. Some errors of grammar or word order which do not, however, interfere with
comprehension.
4. Errors of grammar or word order fairly frequent; occasional re-reading necessary for full
comprehension.
3. Errors of grammar or word order frequent; efforts of interpretation sometimes required on
reader‟s part.
2. Errors of grammar or word order very frequent; reader often has to rely on own
interpretation
1. Errors of grammar or word order so severe as to make comprehension virtually impossible.
Vocabulary
6. Use of vocabulary and idiom rarely (if at all) distinguishable from that of educated native
writer
5. Occasionally uses inappropriate terms or relies on circumlocutions; expressions of ideas
hardly impaired
4. Uses wrong or inappropriate words fairly frequently; expressions of ideas may be limited
because of inadequate vocabulary.
3. Limited vocabulary and frequent errors clearly hinder expressions of ideas
2. Vocabulary so limited and so frequently misused that reader must often rely own
interpretation
1. Vocabulary limitations so extreme as to make comprehension virtually impossible.
Mechanics
6. Few (if any) noticeable lapses in punctuation or spelling
5. Occasional lapses in punctuation or which do not, however, interfere with comprehension.
4. Errors in punctuation or spelling order fairly frequent; occasional re-reading necessary for
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
48
full comprehension.
3. Frequent errors in spelling or punctuation; lead sometimes to obscurity.
2. Errors in punctuation or spelling order so frequent; reader often has to rely on own
interpretation
1. Errors in punctuation or spelling order so severe as to make comprehension virtually
impossible
Fluency (style and ease of communication)
6. Choice of structure and vocabulary consistently appropriate; like that of educated native
writer.
5. Occasional lack of consistency in choice of structure and vocabulary which does not,
however, impair overall ease of communication.
4. „Patchy‟, with some structures or vocabulary items noticeably inappropriate to general
style.
3. Structures or vocabulary items sometimes not only inappropriate but also misused; little
sense of ease if communication
2. Communication often impaired by completely inappropriate or misused structures or
vocabulary items
1. A „hotch- potch‟ of half-learned misused structures and vocabulary items rendering
communication almost impossible.
Form (organization)
6. Highly organized; clear progression of ideas well linked; like educated native writer.
5. Material well organized, links could occasionally be clearer but communication not
impaired
4. Some lack of organization; re-reading required for clarification of ideas.
3. Little or no attempt at connectivity, though reader can deduce some organization.
2. Individual ideas may be clear, but very difficult to deduce connection between them.
1. Lack of organization so serve that communication is seriously impaired.
SCORE: Grammar :
Vocabulary :
Mechanics :
Fluency :
Form :
TOTAL :
E. Data Analysis Technique
The researcher intended to answer the problems formulated and relate
theories in Chapter II. Since the researcher employed qualitative and quantitative
instruments to gather the data, the researcher used the qualitative and quantitative
technique to analyze the data. The researcher used data triangulation to analyze
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
49
the data obtained in this study. According to Johnson and Christensen (2010),
“Triangulation is the use of multiple theories and perspectives to help interpret
and explain the data” (p. 268). The researcher used “data triangulation” which
was offered by Johnson and Christensen (2010). Furthermore, Johnson and
Christensen (2010) state that data triangulation is “the use of multiple data
resources to help understand a phenomenon” (p. 266). In other words, the use of
data triangulation has its purpose to help the researcher analyze the severals data
and interpret them in the form of research report writing. Moreover, as stated by
the researcher before this research employed several data form both qualitative
and quantitative. Fraenkel and Wallen (2009) state, “Triangulation was achieved
not only by comparing teacher interviews, student interviews and observations
but also by comparing these with the quantitative measures of classroom
interaction and achievement.” (p.561). Hence, in order to make the data of this
research more accurate and valid, the researcher needed the data triangulation.
The researcher analyzed the observation checklist and also the field notes
which were made based on the real situation of the teaching-learning process in
the classroom. The researcher used the qualitative method to analyze the
observation checklist, field notes, and also the interview result. The researcher
used the descriptive form to present the results of three instruments. Meanwhile,
the questionnaire and students‟ draft in writing were analyzed using quantitative
method.
The researcher used the numerical form to present the results. For the
questionnaire data, the researcher used the scale item for the questionnaire. The
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
50
questionnaire analysis would use the quantitative method. The researcher would
find the frequency of points of agreement for each categories item in the
questionnaire then calculated the mean score of it. Afterward, the researcher also
conducted an interview to 5 participants in order to get detailed information of
the implementation. The data taken from the interview would be used to analyze
with the other data.
The last data gathered was the students‟ drafts in writing narrative texts.
The students‟ drafts were conducted by the students three times in two cycles. In
the first cycle, the students would conduct the first group drafts and the first
individual drafts. Then, in the second cycle, the students would conduct only the
second individual draft. Each student‟s drafts were assessed by using the scoring
rubric as presented in the research instruments above. Thus, if the students‟
scores in the first cycle were better than their writing ability in the preliminary
study, also if the students‟ scores in the second cycle were better than their scores
in the first cycle, the researcher could conclude that the students make good
progress.
The progresses of the students‟ writing skill were identified based on the
criteria items of the scoring rubric as mentioned in the research instruments. The
researcher checked the students‟ progress in writing skills through the criteria of
the scoring rubric includes their grammar, vocabulary, mechanic, fluency, and
also the form (organization) of their drafts. From the analysis result of the
students‟ drafts, the researcher was able to conclude whether the use of picture
series could help the students to improve their writing skill or not.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
51
F. Research Procedure
This section describes the procedure of this research. There are three parts
which are discussed in the research procedure, namely the conducting of
preliminary study, asking for the research permission, and conducting classroom
action research.
1. Asking for Research Permission
There were several procedures in acquiring the research permission.
Firstly, the researcher went to SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta and met the vice
principal for the curriculum department. The researcher asked for permission to
conduct a classroom action research in this school. Afrer the short meeting, the
researcher asked the secretariat of English Language Education Study Program to
make the permission letter for using the school. After the letter was signed by the
chairperson of English Language Education Study Program, the researcher gave
the letter to the vice principal for the curriculum department. The researcher
submitted the proposal of her research and conducted this study in accordance
with the schedule having been.
2. Conducting a Preliminary Study
In order to identify the problem that occurred in class VIII F of SMP
Negeri 10 Surakarta, the researcher conducted a preliminary study. In the
preliminary study, the researcher made an observation to the students. Hence, the
researcher distributed the questionnaires, to all of the students in order to get more
information on their problems. The researcher also collected the students‟ written
text in the preliminary study. After doing the preliminary study, the researcher
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
52
found what the problems were, the researcher had meeting with the English
teacher class of VIII F and decided to teach narrative texts as the material. The
researcher read some literature as the references to overcome the problems faced
based on the results of the observation, questionnaire, and the students‟ written
texts. The researcher decided to use picture series to improve students‟ writing
skill in composing a narrative text.
3. Conducting Action Research
In this research, the researcher conducted a classroom action research. The
researcher took several steps. First of all, she made lesson plans in implementing
picture series as the media to improve students‟ writing skills in composing the
narrative texts. To prepare the instruments needed in this research, the researcher
made students‟ handouts, students‟ worksheets, observation checklists, field notes,
questionnaires, and also interview guidelines.
Afterward, the researcher conducted the first cycle on April 24th
and April
29th
, 2014. The second cycle was conducted on May 13th
,2014. In each cycle, the
researcher implemented four different sets of picture series. Two sets of picture
series which were implemented in the first cycle were entitled Three Little Pig
and The Greedy Dog. The students made individual drafts using these two picture
series. Meanwhile, two sets of picture series which were implemented in the
second cycle were Cinderella Story, done as a group task for the students and
Thee Rabbit and the Tortoise, done as the individual tasks for the students. In the
end of each cycle, the researcher asked the students to submit their drafts to see
their improvements.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
53
In conducting the research, the researcher needed help from two “peer-
observers”. They were one student of English Language Education Study Program
Sanata Dharma University and an English Teacher of SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta.
The researcher asked them to do the observation and to make the field notes. In
the end of each cycle, the researcher distributed questionnaires to gain the
information whether picture series improve their writing skills in composing
narrative texts. Besides, the researcher conducted the interview to 5 students. It
means to obtain the more detailed information about students‟ opinions and
experiences toward the implementation of picture series in the teaching-learning
process.
Finally, the researcher analyzed the data and gained the results. The
researcher also reflected what worked well and what did not. The first cycle
would be used as the consideration to plan the actions in the next cycle. From all
of these steps, the researcher could draw a conclusion that the picture series could
help students in VIII F Class of SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta to improve their writing
skill in composing narrative texts.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
54
CHAPTER IV
RESEARCH RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
This chapter will present two major parts: the preliminary study and
picture series techniques as a new strategy. In the second part, it will be elaborated
into the implementation of picture series in cycle one, the implementation of
picture series in cycle two, and also lesson learned after the implementation of
picture series technique to improve students‟ writing skills.
This chapter presents the research results and discussion in implementing
the picture series to improve students‟ writing skills in composing narrative text.
The research was conducted in two cycles. The first cycle was applied in two
meetings and the second cycle in one meeting. They were conducted on April
24th
, April 29th
, and May 13th
, 2014.
A. The Preliminary Study
In this section, the researcher presented the information she got in the
preliminary study. The preliminary study was conducted before the
implementation of the picture series technique in cycle one. The preliminary study
or reconnaissance was conducted in order to get the information of the class
situation so that the researcher was able to make the self-reflection and planned
the next preparation to improve the classroom practice (Mills, 2011).
The researcher did the preliminary study in class VIII F of SMP Negeri 10
Surakarta in the academic year 2013/ 2014 on April 15th
, 2014. In the preliminary
study, the researcher used students‟ drafts as the main data. The researcher also
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
55
employed writing scoring rubric and questionnaire. The scoring rubric was used to
assess students‟ writing, while the questionnaire was used to obtain the
information of students‟ perception toward the teaching and learning process. In
conducting the preliminary study, the English teacher gave permission to the
researcher to observe her class. The material which had to be taught was writing a
recount text.
1. Classroom Activities in the Preliminary Study
The teacher started the class by greeting the students and checking the
attendance list. The teacher, after that, reviewed in the elements of recount,
generic structure, and also language features. After reviewing the material, the
teacher asked the students to do assignments in the LKS about translating new
vocabularies which were found in the sample recount text. After that, the teacher
invited the students to check the answer together.
The next activity was individual writing task. The teacher asked the
students to compose the recount texts. In the middle of the writing activity, the
teacher saw that some students did not do their own work. They asked other
students about some words which they did not know. The teacher also saw that
some students got difficulties to start writing the text. Some of them also asked
the teacher about the use of verb 2 in their sentences.
Because of the English teacher did not ask the students to bring their
dictionaries, the students faced the limited English vocabularies. The students also
got difficulties in organizing the idea. Apart from that, the students found
difficulties in applying the past tense verbs, particularly in the use of verb 2 in
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
56
their sentences. In the end of the lesson, the teacher asked the students to submit
their drafts. The teacher would give the drafts back after giving feedback which
the students had to revise. The revised writing had to be submitted on April 17th
,
2014. After that, the researcher distributed the questionnaire of preliminary study
to the students.
2. Students’ Achievement Score in Preliminary Study.
In the preliminary study, the researcher assessed student‟s drafts which
had been revised by using the writing scoring rubric. The data are presented as
follows.
Table 4.1 Students’ Achievement Score in Preliminary Study
No Students
Items Being Measured
Sco
re
Total Score
Passing
Grade (65)
Gra
m
Vo
c
Mec
h
Flu
e
Fo
rm
1 Students 1 3 3 3 3 3 15 50.00 Failed
2 Students 2 2 3 3 3 3 14 46.67 Failed
3 Students 3 2 2 3 3 2 12 40.00 Failed
4 Students 4 3 4 5 4 4 20 66.67 Successful
5 Students 5 3 3 3 3 2 14 46.67 Failed
6 Students 6 3 3 4 4 3 17 56.67 Failed
7 Students 7 2 3 3 3 2 13 43.33 Failed
8 Students 8 3 3 4 4 3 17 56.67 Failed
9 Students 9 2 3 4 3 3 15 50.00 Failed
10 Students 10 2 3 3 3 3 14 46.67 Failed
11 Students 11 2 3 3 3 2 13 43.33 Failed
12 Students 12 2 3 3 3 3 14 46.67 Failed
13 Students 13 2 3 3 4 3 15 50.00 Failed
14 Students 14 3 3 3 4 4 17 56.67 Failed
15 Students 15 3 4 5 4 4 20 66.67 Successful
16 Students 16 3 4 4 5 4 20 66.67 Successful
17 Students 17 3 3 4 3 3 16 53.33 Failed
18 Students 18 3 4 3 3 3 16 53.33 Failed
19 Students 19 2 3 4 3 3 15 50.00 Failed
20 Students 20 3 3 4 3 3 16 53.33 Failed
21 Students 21 3 4 5 4 5 21 70.00 Successful
22 Students 22 3 4 5 4 4 20 66.67 Successful
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
57
23 Students 23 2 3 4 3 3 15 50.00 Failed
24 Students 24 2 3 3 3 4 15 50.00 Failed
25 Students 25 3 3 4 3 3 16 53.33 Failed
26 Students 26 2 3 3 3 2 12 40.00 Failed
Average 52.44
Based on the Table 4.1, there were only 5 (19.23%) of 26 students who
reached the passing grade. It was considered that only 5 students who were
successful in writing the recount texts. Meanwhile, 21 (80.77%) of 26 students
needed improvement because their scores were less than 65. It could be summed
up that most of the students did not reach the passing grade. The students needed
improvement in their writing skills.
a. Grammar
There were no students who got the maximum point in grammar aspect.
There were 14 (53.85%) of 26 students who got 3 points in the grammar aspect.
The others, 12 (46.15%) students got low points, 2. The researcher viewed that
the students still could achieve the higher points of grammar rather than just got
point 3 or 2. All of students needed improvement in the grammar aspect.
b. Vocabulary
In the vocabulary aspect, there was no student who got the maximum point
of the vocabulary aspect. There were only 6 (23.08%) of 26 students who got 4
points. The rest, 19 students got 3 points and 1 student got 2 point. It showed that
most of the students were lack in the vocabulary aspect. Some of them did not
know many vocabularies to be written in their writing.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
58
c. Mechanics
In the mechanics aspects, the researcher saw that some of the students had
been good enough. There were 4 (15.39%) of 26 students who got 5 points. Most
of the students needed improvement in this aspect. It can be seen that 9 students
and 13 students got 4 and 3 points in mechanics skill.
d. Fluency
In this aspect, there was only 1 student (3.85%) who got 5 point. The
others, 8 students and 17 students got 4 and 3 points in fluency aspect. The
researcher saw that most of the students misused structures and vocabularies in
their writing. Therefore, they still needed improvement.
e. Form
There was only 1 (3.85%) student who got 5 point in the form aspect. There
was no one who got the maximum point. There were 6 (23.08%) of 26 students
who got 4 points. The others, there were 14 students and 5 students who got 3
and 2 points for their form skill. The researcher saw that almost all of the
students were still unable to organize their writing.
3. Researcher’s Reflection in the Preliminary Study
In this section, the researcher made the reflection based on the field notes
and the questionnaire. Based on the field notes, since there was no media as a
technique used in the classroom, the teacher-centered method, in which the
students listened to the teacher‟s explanation, was used most of the time. The
researcher also found that the students used the Lembar Kerja Siswa (LKS) or
handbooks only to learn the materials. The handbooks were given by the school.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
59
Moreover, the researcher observed that the students‟ handbooks presented limited
exercises which could be used for the practices by the students.
To obtain more information of the problem encountered by the students in
class VIII F of SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta, the researcher distributed questionnaires
(Appendix C) to them. The results of the questionnaire (Appendix H) showed that
most of the students had difficulties in writing a recount text. It could be seen
from the results of several items in the questionnaire. In item 3, 21 students
(80.77%) agreed that they had difficulties in composing the recount text. The
difficulties were elaborated in items 4 and 5. In item 4, 21 students (80.77%)
disagreed that they felt easy in organizing the ideas of the story and the rest only 5
students (19.23%) agreed.
The other problem encountered by the students was the difficulty in
finding vocabularies to compose the sentences. It was found in item 5. The result
of item 5 were 19 students (73.08%) disagreed with the statement that finding
some English words was easy, while 7 students agreed with it.
As for the media used in the class, the researcher employed item 6 to
gather the data from the students. For item 6, the researcher stated that the media
which was used by the teacher was interesting. The number of students who
disagreed to the statement were 17 students (65.38%) and the rest was 9 (34.62%)
students agreed. In conclusion of the questionnaire, the researcher stated that the
students had felt satisfied with the result of their writing. The result was 22
students disagreed and 4 students agreed.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
60
According to Raimes (1983) and Venkateswaran (1995), in order to
produce good writing, students must have experiences in writing. This theory
answers the problem. The researcher found that students had lack of experiences
in writing. The only use of LKS in teaching and learning writing limits the
students in experiencing writing. Therefore, as a result, the students were weak in
applying the material that had been studied such as grammatical structures,
vocabularies, and tenses. It caused the results of their writing were not really
good.
Moreover, another theory says that techniques of teaching could affect and
improve students‟ writing skill. Dhand (2008) states that the uses of techniques in
teaching and learning process enhance experience of the students. Therefore, it
can be said that the technique which is used in the classroom will influence
students in experiencing writing.
Consequently, the researcher should try to find the appropriate techniques
to teach writing texts to the students. Based on the observation, the researcher
concluded that it was better for the students to experience the practice and the use
of the language rather than to listen to the teacher‟s explanation. Hence, the
students writing skill was expected to improve. The technique should be more
interesting to be engaged with the learning of writing.
B. Picture Series Technique as a New Strategy in Cycle 1
1. The Implementation of Picture Series in the Cycle 1
The use of picture series in the teaching learning process in the first cycle
was conducted in two meetings on Thursday, April 24th
, 2014 and Tuesday, April
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
61
29th
, 2014. Both of the two meetings were conducted in eighty minutes. There
were 26 students who joined in the class. The picture series of this study was
implemented according to the steps of classroom action research. They were
planning, action, observation, and reflection. The researcher also employed the
Feez and Joyce (2002) cycle of “text-based approach”. There are building the
context, modeling and deconstructing the text, joint constructions of the text,
independent construction of the text, and linking to related text.
a. Planning
In this stage, after finding the writing problems faced by class VIII F
students of SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta, the researcher started to do the classroom
action research to help the students improve their writing skill in composing the
narrative texts by using picture series. The researcher began by preparing the
lesson plan and the materials. The researcher made the lesson plan of which the
model was adapted from curriculum 2006 (KTSP).The researcher made the
lesson plan (Appendix D) based on the time allocation which was provided by
the English teacher. The time allocation was 80 minutes. The researcher focused
on the writing skills. The lesson plan was made based on the competence
standard and the basic competence which were elaborated in the syllabus in the
curriculum 2006 (KTSP). The Department of Education of Indonesia had
arranged the competence standard and the basic competence for each grade level.
The competence standard of the lesson plan was expressing the meaning of
simple short functional written texts and essays in the form of recount and
narrative to interact with surrounding environment. Meanwhile, the basic
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
62
competence was expressing meaning and rhetoric steps in simple short essay in
written language accurately, fluently, and acceptable to interact with surrounding
environment in the form of narrative.
According to the competence standard and the basic competence, the
researcher made the indicators of the teaching and learning process. The
indicators showed the actions of the students could be measured and observed in
order to know their achievement of the basic competence of certain subject. In
this lesson plan, the researcher classified the indicators into three aspects:
cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. In the cognitive aspect, the indicators
were students are able to identify the elements of narrative text, the generic
structure of narrative text, and the language features of narrative texts. Also,
students are able to use tenses in narrative text correctly. In the affective aspect,
the indicator was students are able to work in the group. To be specific, through
working in the group, the students were expected to be able to receive others‟
opinions and to respond others‟ opinions. The focus of affective aspects was the
characters building of the students through the activities. In the psychomotor
aspect, the indicators were students were able to arrange the narrative texts into
good paragraphs and make the good narrative text as the results.
The learning goal of the lesson plan was students could make good
narrative texts as the final achievement of the indicators. The topic of the lesson
plan was narrative texts. Moreover, the researcher planned to apply several
learning methods. The researcher applied group work, questions and answer
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
63
section, genre-based method to teach the students writing narrative text, and
giving assignments.
The researcher also planned to make the teaching materials. The
researcher and the English teacher had discussed that the teaching materials were
made by the researcher. Therefore, the researcher adapted materials from two
handbooks: English in Focus for Grade VIII (Wardiman, Jahur, and Djusman,
2008) and also SCAFFOLDING: English for Junior High School Students Grade
VIII (Priyana, Irjayanti, and Renitasari, 2008). The teaching material included
the review information of narrative texts such as elements of narrative texts,
generic structure, language features, the use of tenses and also the application of
the narrative text.
The researcher also made the teaching activities. In the lesson plan, there
were 3 main activities: pre-activities, main activities, and post activities. In the
pre-activities, the researcher intended to introduce the students about what
materials they are going to learn. The researcher entered into the main activities
in which the researcher started to teach and give the materials to the students. In
the post activities, the students and the researcher conclude the materials and
ended the teaching and learning process.
a) Building the Context
In this stage, the researcher planned the pre-activities section. The
researcher arranged a review about narrative text which had been started by the
English teacher. The researcher planned to give handout which contained the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
64
definitions of narrative text, the elements and the language features used in the
narrative text.
b) Modeling and Deconstructing the Text
In this stage, the researcher planned to give an example of narrative text
entitled The Ugly Duckling. From the text, the researcher asked the students to
identify the generic structure, the language features, and also the tenses which
were used in the text.
c) Joint Construction of the Text
In the main activities, the researcher planned to give two activities. First,
the researcher would divide them into six groups, so that there would be four
students for each group. The researcher planned to give them a pre-writing
exercise in the group through a simple game called story chain. The researcher
distributed a blank sheet of paper to each group. Then, the researcher would give
the title of a story and also the first sentence of the story. Students in each group
had to continue the story. Every student had to write one sentence alternately.
The sentence had to connect with the previous sentences. The researcher would
stop the game after all students got their turns. The second activity was
composing the group narrative texts. The researcher planned to give a set of
picture series of a story entitled Three Little Pig which was attached on the
whiteboard. The researcher asked the students to compose the story. The
researcher planned to collect their drafts in the end of the class. This activity
aimed to give the students‟ view about what they were going to do in the class.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
65
Also, this activity helped the students have experience in composing a narrative
text correctly.
d) Independent Construction of the Text
In this stage, the activity made by the researcher was individual tasks. This
activity was conducted in the second meeting of cycle one. After seeing the
results of the groups‟ drafts in the first meeting of cycle one, if there was any
errors which mostly appeared in their drafts, the researcher planned to review in
that part so that the students would really understand before they went to the
individual writing. After doing the review, the researcher planned to give them the
second set of picture series entitled The Greedy Dog. The picture series was
attached on the whiteboard. Here, the researcher asked the students to compose
the story as the individual writing. The researcher would collect the students‟
drafts in the end of the class. After that, the researcher planned to give feedback to
the students‟ drafts. The students‟ drafts would be given back to the students on
Thursday, May 1st, 2014. Finally, the students were asked to revise their drafts
and to submit them on Friday, May 3rd
, 2014. In the post activities, the researcher
planned to give brief review of what they had learnt that day. The researcher also
would remind the students to submit their revised written on Friday, May 3rd
,
2014. In the post activities, the researcher would distribute the questionnaire for
first cycle and would ask the students to fill their questionnaire.
e) Linking to Related Texts
The researcher did not really pay attention to this stage. It was because this
research only focused on the use of picture series to improve writing skill in
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
66
composing narrative text. They did not need to compare their text to the related
text. The researcher made the students focus on the narrative text only.
In the lesson plan, the researcher also added the rubric scoring to assess students‟
drafts and revised writing. The scoring rubric which was used taken from
Anderson‟s scale as cited by Hughes (1989, p. 91-93)
b. Action
In this stage, the researcher implemented the plans which were arranged.
The implementation of the actions based on the lesson plan which was arranged
in the planning stage. The implementation must be in accordance with the
activities planned in the lesson plan. The activities consisted of pre-activities,
main activities, and post- activities. In implementing those three activities the
researcher included the stages of text-based approach (Feez & Joyce, 2002). The
stages are building the context, modeling and deconstructing the text, joint
constructions of the text, independent construction of the text, and also linking to
related text. There were two meetings of the implementation. The first meeting
was conducted on Thursday, April 24th
, 2014. The second meeting was
conducted on Tuesday, April 29th
, 2014.
a. First Meeting
1) Pre- Activity
a) Building the Context
In the beginning of the lesson, the researcher introduced herself to the
students. It was continued by greeting the students. In the introduction, the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
67
researcher asked the students about narrative text. The researcher asked the
students to mention the examples of narrative texts that they had known. The
students answered researcher‟ questions orally by mentioning several examples
of narrative texts.
2) Whilst Activity
b) Modeling and Deconstructing the Text.
The researcher distributed handouts. The researcher made a review on the
definition, elements and language features of narrative texts. The researcher as a
model also invited the students to identify an example story of narrative text in
the handout, The Ugly Duckling.
c) Joint Construction of the Text
In the main activity, the class was divided into six groups. Each group
consisted of four students. The researcher named the group with Group 1, Group
2, Group 3, Group 4, Group 5, and Group 6. The students were asked to play a
game as their pre-writing activity. The name of the game was story chain. The
researcher prepared the blank sheet of papers for each group. The researcher gave
the title and the first sentence of the story, then, the students were asked to
continue it. Each student wrote a sentence and it was continued by the other
students in the group. The sentences had to have connection one to another so
that in the end of the game, the group would produce a story. The title of the
story was Golden Cucumber (Timun Mas). The first sentence given by the
researcher was “Long time ago, there lived an old widow named Mbok Rondo
who had no child.” The students would continue the sentence. After finishing the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
68
game, the researcher invited the students to read together their written text in
groups.
Then, the second activity was composing the story of The Three Little
Pig. The researcher attached the picture series on the whiteboard. The researcher
also gave key words as the main vocabularies which were used in the text. The
researcher also permitted the students to use their dictionaries. The students
composed the text as their group works. The researcher asked the students to
submit their works in the end of the lesson.
d) Independent Construction of the Text
This stage was not done in the first meeting. The researcher would only
focus on the group work for the students before they started to write individually.
The independent task for individual writing activity was done in the second
meeting of cycle one. In the meeting one of cycle one, the researcher only
focused on the group drafts.
e) Linking to Related Texts
The researcher did not necessarily follow this stage since the students
only focused on writing narrative texts. This stage was employed for post
activities.
3) Post activity
In the post activity, the researcher reviewed the students‟ achievement of
learning through an asking and answering session. After that, the researcher gave
the conclusion orally to the students. The researcher also reminded the students
to bring their dictionary. Then, the researcher ended the lesson of the day.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
69
b. Second Meeting
The second meeting was conducted on Tuesday, 29th
April, 2014. There
were 26 students who joined in the lesson. The topic in the second meeting was
narrative texts for the individual drafts. There were 3 main activities.
1) Pre-Activity
In the pre-activities, the researcher began the class by greeting the
students. The students answered the greeting eagerly. The researcher also checked
the attendance list of the class. There was no student absent in the class.
a) Building the Context
In this step, the researcher started to give a review based on the results of
the group drafts done in the previous meeting. The researcher found that the
students still made errors in the use of past tense verbs in their sentences.
Particularly, the researcher found the grammatical errors that occurred in the use
of verb 2 and be form in the sentences. Therefore, the researcher gave thereview
on these parts in order to convince them that they would comprehend the
language elements before they did the individual draft.
The researcher made exercises in order to help the students reviewed the
materials. The researcher distributed some exercises to the students. The students
had to do the exercises. The exercise consists of 10 sentences which had
grammatical errors in the use of verb 2 and be form. The students had to analyze
those sentences and correct them. After they finishing the exercise, the researcher
discussed the answers with the students. The researcher also explained the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
70
reasons of the answer for each sentence. The students noted the explanation of
the researcher.
2) Main Activity
b) Modeling and Deconstructing the Text
The researcher asked them to gather in the group. The groups were the
same as the previous meeting. The researcher also gave a narrative text to the
students. The narrative text was The Story of Cinde Laras. They were asked to
identify the errors of the past tense which occurred in the text. After finishing
their assignment, the students and the researcher checked the work together.
c) Joint Construction of the Text
In the second meeting, the researcher focused on the individual composing
texts. Therefore, in this stage, the activity was the same as the deconstructing
activity since the student were asked to identify the errors of the past tense which
occurred in the text The Story of Cinde Laras in a group form.
d) Independent Construction of the Text
The second activity was composing the individual draft of narrative text.
Here, the researcher used a set of picture series again. The picture series was
about a story of The Greedy Dog. The picture series was attached on the
whiteboard, the same as the previous meeting. Here, the researcher provided the
keywords or the main vocabularies related to the story. Then, the students were
asked to compose a story related to the picture series individually. The researcher
allowed them to open their dictionaries. Conversely to the group draft in the
previous meeting, the individual writings had to be done individually.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
71
After finishing the writing, the students were asked to submit their
drafts. Then, the researcher gave the feedback to their drafts and returned to them
on Thursday, May 1st, 2014. After that, the students were asked to submit their
revised written on Tuesday, May 13th
, 2014. The researcher distributed the
questionnaire of the first cycle (Appendix C) and asked the students to fill up the
questionnaire.
3) Post Activity
In the post activities, the researcher reviewed what the students had learnt
by asking and answering some questions orally. The researcher then ended the
class of that day.
e) Linking to Related Text
The researcher did not necessarily follow this stage since the students only
focused on writing the narrative texts. This stage was employed for post
activities.
c. Observation
The observation was conducted in two meetings on Thursday, April 24th
.
2014 and Tuesday, April 29th
, 2014. In this stage, the researcher had double role
as the English teacher and the researcher. To observe the classroom, the
researcher also asked for help from two peer- observers (Zepeda, 2014). They
were the English teacher of the class and one student of English Language
Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University to observe the researcher
and students‟ activities during the implementation of picture series in teaching
narrative texts. Based on Foster (1996), in order to obtain the detailed
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
72
information, the observation was conducted by using several research
instruments. These instruments which were employed to obtain the data in cycle
one were observation checklist, students‟ score in their revised written, field
notes, and also questionnaire. The analyses of each instrument were presented as
follows.
1) The Analysis of Observation Checklist and Field Notes of Cycle 1
As clarified in the chapter 3, the researcher employed observation
checklist as one of research instruments which was used in this study. The peer-
observers did the observation of the teaching-learning activities by checking the
observation sheets (Appendix C) since the researcher employed checklist yes and
no form (Sloan & Sloan, 2013). Since the researcher used checklist form for the
observation sheet, the researcher decided to employ the field notes (Appendix C)
in order to obtain the supporting data of the classroom (Tomal, 2010).
The observation was done on the same time as the implementation was
done. The observers did the observation of the activities in the class while the
researcher was conducting the implementation of pictures series in the teaching-
learning process. The data were obtained from the teacher‟s activities
observation sheet, students‟ activities observation sheet, and also from field
notes. The followings are the summary of the results of observation checklists
and field notes which were done by the peer-observers.
a. First Meeting
The first observation was done in the first meeting of cycle one on
Thursday, April 24th
, 2014. Based on the observation sheet of the researcher‟s
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
73
activities, the researcher could do the teaching process step by step. The
researcher also gave clear instructions to the students. The researcher managed the
class well particularly when she used the picture series. It could be seen when the
researcher prepared the picture series, whereas the media was unfamiliar to the
students, they were very enthusiastic to see the picture series. The researcher
introduced and invited the students to engage to the pictures series presented in
the teaching and learning process. The same finding was found in the result of
field notes of cycle one (Appendix F):
“The students looked very enthusiastic to the picture series. By
using picture series, the lesson was more interesting. They tried
to find the new vocabularies which they saw in the picture
series. They also became more active in the group. However,
there were some groups who still had difficulty in composing
the text. The researcher visited the group and tried to guide
those groups.”
(Field notes, on Thursday, April 24th
, 2014)
The researcher did not speak English most of the time while teaching the
students. The researcher still used Bahasa Indonesia to teach them in order to help
the students understand the instructions and the materials given.
Related to the materials, the researcher taught the students in accordance
with the lesson plan. The researcher also mastered the materials well. The
researcher spoke clearly and loudly so that the students could understand the
materials and questions given. Unfortunately, the researcher could not manage the
time well. While conducting the first cycle, the implementation of pre-writing
activity exceeded from the time which had been prepared in the lesson plan. Also,
in the group activity, the technique in presenting the picture series on whiteboard
influenced the students‟ situation. It can be seen from the field notes:
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
74
“They also became more active in the group. However, the
main problem here was that since the picture series was
attached on the whiteboard, some students came forward to see
the picture series. They were busy huddling together in front of
the class and it wasted the time to do their work.”
(Field notes, on Thursday, April 24th
, 2014)
Based on the observation sheet on the students‟ activities, all of the
students understood and followed the researcher‟s instructions. Sometimes, they
made some noisy voice, talked about another topic which was not related to the
topic. However, they could be managed well. When the researcher did eye contact
with them, they knew that they had to give their attention to the researcher‟s
explanation. In the group work, some students did not cooperate actively. They
did not understand what they had to do. The researcher came to their seats and
tried to give more explanation to them. The researcher asked them to submit their
group writing and gave feedback to their work.
b. Second Meeting
The second observation was conducted in the second meeting of cycle one
on Tuesday, April 29th
, 2014. There were 26 students in the class. The researcher
started the meeting by greeting the students and asking their readiness since the
lesson was in the last hour of the day. In the second meeting, the researcher
delivered the materials in accordance with the lesson plan. Since the researcher
had the results of the group drafts in the first meeting, she started to review on
the parts where the students made errors. The researcher gave more explanations
to the students about the use of verb 2 and be form used in the past tense. The
researcher guided the students by way of providing the questions and answers
section. The researcher could respond the students‟ questions well. Besides, the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
75
researcher gave positive reinforcement to the students who could answer the
other students‟ question. In the second meeting, the researcher could manage the
time wisely than in the first meeting.
Based on the observation sheet on students‟ activities, the students looked
more enthusiastic when the researcher explained the materials. It could be seen
that the students started to get relaxed with the classroom atmosphere. Some of
them felt confident enough to state their opinion or just raised their hand to ask
something.
In the main activity of second meeting, the researcher asked the students
to compose a story from the picture series given individually. Here, the students
looked enthusiastic. They enjoyed the individual activity. But, unfortunately, the
classroom‟ situation still did not really conducive because of the technique in
presenting the picture series on the whiteboard. It can be seen in the results of
field notes of cycle two (Appendix F):
“The students were still enthusiastic with the picture series used
in the learning process. But, because of the picture series was
attached on the whiteboard, some of the students come in front
to see the details of the picture series. They wasted their time to
look the picture series rather than did their work.”
(Field notes, on Tuesday. April 29th
, 2014)
Some students still asked their friends when they were doing the writing.
The teacher asked them to do their own work and reminded them to always bring
their dictionary. The students who came in front of the class to see the detail of
the picture series also used the chances to talk about the other topics with their
friends. They wasted their time to compose the individual drafts. The teacher
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
76
visited them and asked them to go back to their seat. The same statements were
found in the field notes of cycle two:
“Also, there were some students who still had difficulty in
composing the text. Few students in the groups did their
writings then the rest just saw the picture series in front of the
class then informed to these students. Also, there were students
who talked about another topic which did not related to the
lesson. But the researcher tried to always control them. The
researcher visited the students and tried to guide them.”
(Field notes, on Thursday, April 29th
, 2014)
After finishing the writing, the researcher asked them to submit their
drafts. The researcher gave the feedback of their drafts. The students‟ drafts
would be returned to the students on Thursday, May 1st, 2014. Finally, the
students were asked to revise their drafts and to submit them on Friday, May 3rd
,
2014.
2) The Analysis of Students’ Score and Questionnaire of Cycle 1
In order to provide the evidences of students‟ improvement in the writing
skills, the researcher presented some aspects that showed the improvements
made by the students compared to their achievements in the preliminary study.
The results of cycle one was 15 out of 26 students (57.69%) reached the passing
grade for English subject. The passing grade of English subject for eight graders
in SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta was 65. It indicated that more than half of the
students in the class reached the passing grade. Meanwhile, in the preliminary
study only 5 (19.23%) of 26 students who reached the passing grade.
It could be summed up, in cycle one the students had made progress. The
number of the students who reached the passing grade increased. The following
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
77
was the presentation of their improvement in the form of table of students‟ scores
in their writing performance result which was done in cycle one.
Table 4.2 The Students’ Achievement Score in Cycle 1
No. Students’
Numbers
CYCLE 1
Indivi
dual
Draft
Score
Gra
m
Vo
c
Mec
h
Flu
e
Fo
rm
Revised
Written
Total Score
Note
1 Student 1 70.00 4 5 4 4 4 70.00 Successful
2 Student 2 56.67 3 4 4 4 4 60.00 Failed
3 Student 3 53.33 4 4 4 4 3 66.67 Successful
4 Student 4 66.67 5 5 5 4 4 76.67 Successful
5 Student 5 50.00 3 2 3 4 4 50.00 Failed
6 Student 6 70.00 4 5 4 5 5 76.67 Successful
7 Student 7 56.67 3 4 4 3 4 60.00 Failed
8 Student 8 63.33 5 5 5 4 4 76.67 Successful
9 Student 9 53.33 3 2 4 3 3 50.00 Failed
10 Student 10 60.00 6 5 5 4 5 83.33 Successful
11 Student 11 50.00 4 4 4 3 4 63.33 Failed
12 Student 12 56.67 4 4 4 3 4 63.33 Failed
13 Student 13 63.33 4 4 4 4 5 70.00 Successful
14 Student 14 56.67 4 4 3 4 3 60.00 Failed
15 Student 15 80.00 5 5 5 6 5 86.67 Successful
16 Student 16 70.00 5 6 5 5 5 86.67 Successful
17 Student 17 60.00 4 5 4 4 4 70.00 Successful
18 Student 18 56.67 4 4 3 4 4 63.33 Failed
19 Student 19 56.67 6 5 5 5 5 83.33 Successful
20 Student 20 56.67 4 5 4 4 5 73.33 Successful
21 Student 21 76.67 5 5 5 5 4 80.00 Successful
22 Student 22 63.33 4 5 4 4 4 70.00 Successful
23 Student 23 53.33 5 5 4 3 4 70.00 Successful
24 Student 24 60.00 5 5 5 4 3 73.33 Successful
25 Student 25 56.67 5 5 4 4 3 70.00 Successful
26 Student 26 56.67 4 4 4 4 3 63.33 Failed
Average 60.57 69.87
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
78
According to Table 4.1, it could be seen that the students made progress
on their writing skills. Their scores improved from the preliminary study, the first
individual drafts, and the revised written text. Besides, the students‟ achievement
in each aspect of writing skill also increased. The data were presented as follows.
a. Grammar
In the grammar aspects which were compared to the preliminary study,
there was no student who got point 6. The improvement of this aspect was there
were 1 (3.85%) of 26 students who got 6 as the maximum point of the scoring
rubric. There were 9 (34.62%) of 26 students who got 5 points in the grammar
aspect. There were 12 (46.15%) students who got 4 points. The others were 4
(15.38%) students who got 3 points. In cycle one after implementing the picture
series, there were no students who got 2 point in the grammar skill likewise in the
preliminary study.
b. Vocabulary
The implementation of picture series did improve students‟ vocabulary.
Students were accustomed to using their dictionary to find the meaning of new
words. The points of vocabulary aspect in cycle one increased from the
preliminary study. In the preliminary study, there was no one who got the
maximum point of vocabulary aspect. In cycle one, there was 1 (3.85%) student
who got 6 point. Also, there were 14 (53.85%) students who got 5 points. There
was no student who got 5 in the preliminary study. There were 9 (34.62%) of 26
students who got 4 points. The rest, there were 2 (7.69%) students who got 2
point.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
79
c. Mechanics
In the mechanics aspects, the researcher saw that some of the students had
been good enough in the preliminary study. But, still, the students made progress.
In the cycle one, students who got 5 points increased from 4 in the preliminary
study became 8 (30.77%). The others, 15 (57.69%) students got 4 points. There
were 3 (711.54%) students who got 3 point.
d. Fluency
In the fluency aspect, because of the grammar aspect and vocabulary aspect
increased, students produced better structure and vocabulary in composing the
story. In this aspect, there was no student who got 6 point as the highest score in
scoring rubric in the preliminary study. After the implementation of picture series,
there was 1 student (3.85%) who got 6. Also, there were 4 (15.38%) students who
got 5 points compared to preliminary study only in which 1 student got this point.
There were 16 students (61.54%) who got 4 points and 5 (19.23%) students who
got 3 points.
e. Form
In the form aspect, after implementing the picture series, the students looked
getting easier in organizing the idea. The students made improvement. There was
only 1 (3.85%) student who got 5 point in the form aspect in the preliminary
study. In cycle one, there were 7 (26.92%) students who got 5 points. There were
6 (23.08%) of 26 students who got 4 points in the preliminary study. In cycle one,
there were 13 (50.00%) of the students who got 4 points. The others, 6 (23.08 %)
students who got 3 points as the lowest point.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
80
The researcher employed the supporting research instruments to obtain the
data from the students. The researcher employed questionnaire in the cycle one
(Appendix C). The questionnaire of the first cycle consisted of three major parts
which were employed to observe the action implementation in the first cycle.
They were learning activity, learning product, and students‟ attitude. The result
(Appendix G) was presented as follows:
1) Learning activity conducted by the researcher in the first cycle
In discussing this topic, the researcher provided five statements. Those
five questions are placed in the beginning of the questionnaire. The researcher
presented the results of the questionnaire using the criteria of the total mean
score counted from the result of this topic. Here are the criteria of the total mean
score:
5.00 – 8.75 useless
8.76 – 12.50 less useful
12.51 – 16.25 useful
16.26 – 20.00 very useful
The total mean score of this topic was 15.69. It was considered as the
useful criteria. The students of class VIII F of SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta accepted
the activities which were implemented as the useful activities. The activities
implemented in the first cycle were made in order to improve students‟ writing
skills in composing narrative text. They were writing in a group, playing game as
the pre-writing activities, and also using the picture series to compose individual
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
81
draft. It was proved by the fact that 14 students (53.85%) who agreed and 5
students (19.23%) who strongly agreed that working in the group helped them in
composing the narrative texts. Meanwhile, there were 7 students (26.92%) who
disagreed that working in group could help them in composing a narrative text.
The game which was presented by the researcher in pre-writing actvity
could help them before they had to compose their individual drafts. It was proved
by the fact that 14 students (53.85%) agreed to the statement and 7 students
(26.92%) strongly agreed. They were 5 students (19.23%) who disagreed that
pre- writing activity could help them to practice their first writing of a narrative
text.
Picture series as a technique was used in this study in order to help the
students in practicing their writing. There were 16 students (61.5%) who strongly
agreed and 8 students (30.77%) agreed to that statement. Conversely, there were
2 students disagreed that picture series could help them in composing the
narrative texts.
Based on these results, the researcher could sum up that the activities were
applied in the first cycle were useful. However, the researcher still had to modify
and improve the activities since the researcher reflected that there were activities
which went well and which did not. The researcher also referred to the field
notes done by the observer in the first cycle to plan the activities in the second
cycle in order to obtain the very useful criteria in the second cycle.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
82
2) Learning products which were obtained by the students
In this part, the researcher presented 6 statements. The researcher provided
statements which were employed to observe students‟ achievement in composing
the narrative texts. The statements discussed the elements in narrative texts which
must be achieved by the students: the organization of ideas, the use of
vocabularies, the arrangement of generic structure, and also the use of the
appropriate tenses in the sentences. Here, the researcher made the criteria of the
total mean score:
06.00 – 10.50 very low achievement
10.51 – 15.00 low achievement
15.01 – 19.50 high achievement
19.51 – 24.00 very high achievement
The total mean score of this topic was 19.31. It indicated that the
application of the technique (picture series) could help the students to improve
their writing skills. The criterion achieved was high. The activities and the
techniques used in the first cycle could help them produce the better writing
product from the preliminary study. It could be seen that 10 students (38.46%)
agreed, 9 students (34.61%) strongly agreed, and 7 students (26.92%) disagreed
that picture series made them able to organize the ideas of the story. The
researcher also provided a statement about finding the new vocabularies to be
used in the story. The results were 12 students (46.15%) agreed 10 students
(38.46%) strongly agreed, and also 4 students (15.38%) disagreed that picture
series could help them in finding new vocabularies to compose the story.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
83
Referring to the generic structure of narrative text, there were 8 students (30.77%)
who agreed, 13 students (50.00%) who strongly agreed, and 5 students (19.23%)
who disagreed that picture series could help them in applying the appropriate
generic structure of narrative to the story they made. The researcher also
presented a statement related to the use of tense (simple past tense) to compose
the story. There were 11 students (42.31%) who agreed, 9 students (34.62%) who
strongly agreed, and 6 students (23.08%) who disagreed that the use of picture
series could help them in understanding the tense used for composing the story.
However, the achievement was not in very high level. The researcher
should clarify the focus on the second cycle for instance the form of the picture
series should be improved, the focus on the vocabulary and also tenses. In the
second cycle the researcher expected to achieve the very high level in the criteria.
3) Students‟ perception toward the learning process
This was the last topic discussed in the questionnaire. There were 4
statements provided by the researcher. The statements were used to obtain the
data of the students‟ perception toward what the researcher gave in the learning
activities and also their achievements in composing the narrative texts. Here are
the criteria of total mean score in this topic:
4.00 – 7.00 very low
7.01 – 10.00 low
10.01 – 13.00 high
13.01 – 16.00 very high
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
84
The total score of this topic was 13.62. It means that the students of class
VIII F class of SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta had willingness to improve their
writing skills since the level of the criteria was very high. By using picture series
in learning composing the narrative texts, most of the students were motivated to
write better than in the preliminary study. It could be seen from the questionnaire
that 17 students (65.38%) agreed, 4 students (15.38%) strongly agreed, 4
students (15.38%) disagreed, and 1 student (3.85%) strongly disagreed to the use
of picture series. Most of the students also viewed picture series as an interesting
technique to be used since they were not bored with the activities. It was proved
by the results that 18 students (69.23%) agreed, 15 students (57.69%) strongly
agreed, 1 student (3.85%) disagreed and 2 students (7.69%) strongly disagreed
that picture series made them not bored with the activities. Moreover, there were
14 students (53.85%) agreed and 8 students (30.77%) strongly agreed that they
felt more confident and enthusiastic while engaging with the writing activities.
There were only 3 students (11.54%) disagreed and 1 student (3.85%) who
strongly disagreed to the statement.
d. Reflection
Generally, the implementation of the picture series in cycle one was going
in accordance with the lesson plan. Based on the results of the observation
checklist and field notes, the peer-observers stated that the researcher could
manage the class well. The researcher had used clear voice and intonation. The
researcher also used clear instructions to the students. The field notes especially
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
85
recorded that the students were enthusiastic in joining the classroom activities.
To be particular, the use of picture series as the technique could grab students‟
attention in learning writing skills.
Another important thing was that the students could improve their writing
skills after experiencing the picture series technique. The improvement could be
seen in the students‟ achievements in the writing scoring rubric of cycle one
compared to what they had achieved in the preliminary study.
However, what had been implemented in the cycle one still needed
improvements. It was clarified that the group activity which was conducted by
the researcher in cycle one wasted time. Besides, in the field notes, observers
also stated that the technique of presenting the picture series was not really
appropriate. The researcher had to modify the technique in presenting the picture
series.
In the classroom action research (CAR), as the practitioner, the researcher
should find the appropriate solution for the classroom‟s problem (Ary et al.,
2010; and Richard, 2005). Therefore, the researcher thought that the results of
the implementation in cycle one still could be improved in the cycle two. In this
case, the researcher tried to plan modifying the activities and the technique in
presenting the picture series.
C. Changes in Cycle 2
According to the reflection in cycle one, the implementation of picture
series technique was good enough since the researcher did it in accordance with
the lesson plan. Nevertheless, the classroom practice still needed some
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
86
improvements. Therefore, the researcher planned to revise and modify what had
been done in cycle one. Since the fact that the activity, particularly in the group
activity, and also the technique in presenting the picture series were not really
appropriate in cycle one, the researcher planned to modify them in order to
optimize their improvement in the writing skills.
As stated in chapter two, in the text-based approach, one of the stages is
joint construction of the text (Feez & Joyce, 2002) in which students need to
experience their own contribution in composing the narrative text. The researcher
as the teacher has to reduce her contribution in giving the guidance. This stage
should be strengthened before they run to the next stage, independent
construction of the text. Joint construction of the text helps students to start their
very first writing before they write independently. Therefore, the researcher
planned to strengthen this stage by modifying the activity. Based on the
questionnaire results, the applying activities in the form of group work was
already good. It can be seen from the result of item 2 that 14 (53.85%) students
agreed and 5 (19.23%) students strongly agreed that working in the group helped
them in composing the text. Meanwhile, based on the field notes done by the
observers and the researcher‟s observation, story chain as the pre-writing activity
in the group activity did not really work. Therefore, the researcher changed the
activity become arranging the jumbled paragraphs of the narrative texts. The
students were also asked to fill the blank words of the paragraphs. Besides, the
number of students for each group also affected the effectiveness of the group
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
87
activity. Therefore, the researcher made the groups which consist of 4 or 5
students in cycle one into pairs in cycle two.
As clarified in chapter two, the techniques used in teaching affect to the
learner‟s understanding of the process. Also, the use of technique in teaching
should be potential to enhance and enrich the learning process (Dhand, 2008).
According to the theory, the technique which was employed by the teacher
should help the students to enhance and enrich their understanding of the topic.
Based on the fact, the researcher found that the way of presenting the picture
series by attaching them on the white board was not really effective for the
students. Therefore, the researcher planned to distribute the picture series directly
to the students. It was aimed to optimize the usage of the picture series to help
the students in composing the narrative texts.
2. The Implementation of Picture Series in the Cycle 2
In cycle two, the topic was similar to cycle one. It was about composing
narrative text. The differences were the group activity and the way of presenting
the picture series to the students. The researcher still employed the picture series
as a technique to improve students‟ writing skills.
The second cycle of implementing picture series was conducted in one
meeting: Tuesday, May 13th
, 2014. This meeting was conducted in eighty
minutes. There were 26 students who joined in the class. The researcher employed
the same steps as the first cycle namely planning, action, observation, and
reflection.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
88
a. Planning
The researcher had reflected what went well and what did not go well in
the first cycle. The researcher began to plan the second cycle action. In this step,
the researcher prepared the lesson plan (Appendix D) and the materials. The
lesson plan and the materials were prepared based on the reflection done in the
first cycle. The same as in cycle one, the researcher made the lesson plan based on
the model of curriculum 2006 (KTSP). The time allocation was 80 minutes and
the focus was writing skills. The researcher also employed the same competence
standard and the basic competence of English which were made by the
Department of Education. Besides, the indicators included cognitive, affective and
psychomotor, which were the same as lesson plan in cycle one. Moreover, the
learning goal in the lesson plan of cycle two was the same as in cycle one; the
students could make good narrative text as the final achievement of the indicators.
The methods which were used in the lesson plan cycle two still similar. They were
group work, questions and answers section, genre-based approach method to teach
the students in composing narrative texts, and giving assignments to the.
The researcher still employed the books: English in Focus for Grade VIII
(Wardiman et al., 2008) and SCAFFOLDING: English for Junior High School
Students Grade VIII (Priyana et al., 2008). The teaching materials were adapted
from these books. In the lesson plan, there were three activities employed: pre-
activities, main activities, and post activities.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
89
a) Building the Context
In the pre- activities, the researcher began to review the materials from the
previous meeting. The researcher reviewed the use of simple past tense like be
form and verb 2 by asking the students orally. In this activity, the researcher also
explained what they were going to do in the class.
b) Modeling and Deconstructing the Text
In the main activities, the researcher planned to ask the students to work in
pair. The researcher would give a set of jumbled picture series to the students. The
students had to arrange the jumbled picture series into the correct sequences. A set
of jumbled picture series entitled Cinderella Story. Then, the researcher asked the
students to work in pairs to identify the picture series. The students were asked to
identify characters and setting of the story which were described in the picture
series. After that, the researcher would distribute the jumbled paragraphs of the
story of the picture series. The researcher asked the students to work in pair and
arrange the correct sequences of the paragraphs. It aimed in order to make the
students understand the chronological events of the story. Also, the researcher
wanted to develop the ideas of the story by asking the students to identify what
were presented in the picture series (people, things, and places)
c) Joint Construction Text
Using the same text as in the stage modeling and deconstructing text, the
students worked to the next activity. Since there were several blanks in the
paragraphs, after finishing the paragraph arrangements, the students were asked
to fill up the blanks using the appropriate words.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
90
d) Independent Construction of the Text
After working in pairs, the researcher planned to give a set of picture
series. The picture series was used to compose the individual drafts. The title of the
picture series was The Rabbit and the Tortoise. The researcher would distribute a
set of picture series to the students and asked them to compose the story. In
conducting the research, the researcher planned to allow the students to find
difficult words in the dictionary. Then, the researcher planned to collect the
students‟ drafts in the end of the class. The researcher planned to give feedback on
their writing. The students‟ draft would be given back on Friday, May 16th
, 2014.
After that, the researcher planned to ask the students to collect the revised written
text on Monday, May 19th
, 2014.
In the post activities, the researcher planned to have a question and answer
session. It was aimed to ensure that the students understood the researcher‟s
explanation and also the materials given. The researcher also planned to distribute
the questionnaire of the second cycle. The students were asked to fill the
questionnaire. After that, the researcher collected the questionnaire and thanked the
English teacher, the students class VIII F of SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta, and also the
peer-observer for their help and cooperation during the implementation of the
research.
e) Linking to Related Text
The researcher did not have to follow this stage since the students only
focused in writing narrative text. To avoid students‟ confusion in understanding
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
91
the two or more kinds of text, the researcher decided not to relate narrative text
with other texts.
b. Action
The action was conducted in one meeting. The meeting was conducted on
Tuesday, May 13th
, 2014. The time allocation of the meeting was 80 minutes. The
topic of the meeting was similar to topic in cycle one. The differences of the
action in cycle 1 and cycle two were the activities. In this stage, the students were
arranging the jumbled picture series of Cinderella Story which was done in pairs
and also the technique of composing the individual draft of the picture series
entitled The Rabbit and the Tortoise.
1) Pre- Activities
a) Building the Context
In the pre-activities, the researcher began the lesson by greeting the
students. The researcher asked the students what they had learnt in the previous
meeting. The researcher checked the students‟ understanding by asking them
orally about the last materials. The researcher also informed the students that the
result of their writing in the first cycle was better than the preliminary study. They
made progress although they still made some errors in composing the narrative
texts.
2) Main Activities
b) Modeling and Deconstructing the Text
In the main activities, the researcher conducted two main activities: the
group activity and the individual activity. The researcher began the lesson by
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
92
asking the students to work in pairs. The researcher distributed a set of jumbled
picture series of Cinderella Story to each pair. Then, the students were asked to
arrange the picture series into the correct sequences. After that, the researcher
invited the students to identify the picture series. The researcher asked the
students to identify the characters, the things, and the places of the picture series
orally. The researcher pointed several pairs randomly to answer the identification
of the picture series. The researcher also invited the other students to give their
opinion by adding more information. After that, the researcher distributed the
jumbled paragraphs to each pair. The jumbled paragraphs were the story of the
picture series before. Then, the researcher asked the students to arrange the
paragraphs into a complete story.
c) Joint Construction of the Text
In this stage, the researcher used the same text as in the modeling and
deconstructing text stage. After finishing the arrangement of the paragraphs,
since the paragraphs contained several blanks of words, the students were asked
to fill the blanks using the appropriate words. The words had been listed by the
researcher on a sheet of paper in the paper. The students chose the appropriate
words to fill the blanks. After finishing the work, the students and the researcher
discussed the answers together. Then, the researcher asked the students to submit
their work.
d) Independent Construction of the Text
The activity in this step was composing the narrative texts individually.
The researcher distributed the second set of picture series. The story of picture
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
93
series was The Rabbit and the Tortoise. The researcher asked the students to
compose the story. The students were given 40 minutes to write the story. The
researcher allowed the students to use their dictionaries for some difficult
vocabularies. The researcher asked them to submit their drafts in the end of the
lesson. The researcher informed the students that the researcher would give a
feedback to their drafts. The drafts should be given back on Friday, May 16th
,
2014. After that, the researcher asked the students to collect the revised written text
on Monday, May 19th
, 2014.
3) Post Activities
In the post activities, the researcher reviewed what the students had learnt.
The researcher also gave the chances to them to ask questions related to the
materials of the day. Then, the researcher distributed questionnaires (Appendix
C) to them, and they were asked to answer the questions. After collecting the
questionnaire of the students, the researcher thanked the participants who were
involved in the research: the English teacher, the students of VIII F class of SMP
Negeri 10 Surakarta, and also the peer-observer, for their cooperation.
e) Linking to Related Text
The researcher did not have to follow this stage since the students only
focused in writing narrative text. This stage was employed for post activities.
c. Observation
The observation was conducted in one meeting on Tuesday, May 13th
,
2014, the same time as the action implementation in the second cycle. The
researcher asked for help from two peer-observers (Zepeda, 2014). There were
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
94
the English teacher of class VIII F of SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta and a student of
English Language Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University to
observe the teaching-learning process during the implementation. In this cycle,
the observation still employed several instruments to obtain the data in order to
get detailed information (Foster, 1996). The data were obtained from the
teacher‟s observation checklists activities, students‟ observation checklists
activities and also from field notes. The difference from cycle 1 was the
researcher added students‟ interview in this cycle. The findings of each
instrument were presented as follows.
1) The Analysis of Observation Checklist and Field Notes of Cycle 2
The researcher used yes-no form of the observation checklist (Sloan &
Sloan, 2013).The researcher also employed field notes in order to support the
data of the classroom observation (Tomal, 2010). The observation was done at
the same time as the implementation of cycle two. The results of the data
(Appendix E and Appendix F) were presented in the descriptive form. Basically,
the data which were obtained from the observation checklist and field notes in
cycle two indicated that the students made progress for their writing skills.
The data from the observation checklist of the teacher‟s activities indicated
that the researcher could manage the class well. The data also showed that the
researcher gave clear instructions to the students while teaching them. In cycle
one, the data form the observation checklist showed that the researcher used
Bahasa Indonesia for giving instructions frequently. Meanwhile, in cycle two, the
researcher used English more often than the Bahasa Indonesia.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
95
The data of observation checklist also indicated that the researcher
mastered the materials well. The researcher also taught the materials in
accordance with the lesson plan that had been made before. In the middle of the
teaching-learning process, the researcher also gave positive reinforcement to the
students. Since the group work was in pairs, the researcher could control the
students well. The class condition was more conducive than the previous
meeting. The researcher made the students enjoy asking about the material. They
felt more confident to ask about their difficulties to the researcher. Similarly, the
researcher was also enthusiastic in responding students‟ questions or response. It
was consistent with the information found in the field notes of cycle two
(Appendix F):
“While conducting the teaching-learning process, the
researcher looked enjoyable in teaching the students since the
condition of the class was very conducive. It was the same as
the students. They looked more enthusiastic when they worked
in the activities given by the researcher. Some of them were
confident enough to ask and to share their opinions to the
researcher about the materials.”
(Field notes, on Tuesday, May 13th
, 2014)
The data showed that the students were enthusiastic with the activities.
They enjoyed working in pairs. They were involved in the learning process.
Some of them were more confident in expressing their opinions. Based on the
observation, the students were very noisy in the previous meeting because they
worked in the group consisting of 4-5 students. But, in this cycle, the students
were not busy talking to other students about other topics. They focused on the
group discussion. It can be seen in the field notes of cycle:
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
96
“In the group work, the students did not waste their time as in
cycle one. They were busy talking to others about other topics.
Then, after the researcher changed the activity in the group
work, the class became more conducive. They enjoyed working
in pairs. They easily finished the assignments which were given
to them.”
(Field notes, on Tuesday, May 13th
, 2014)
The data also indicated that they focused on their own writing since all
students got their own picture series. They focused only on their own picture
series. They enjoyed composing the narrative text based on the picture series.
Moreover, the research always reminded them to bring their dictionaries so that
they could find the new vocabulary by own. The same results appeared in the
field notes cycle two.
“The students were satisfied to the picture series given to them. They
focused on their own picture series and did not waste their time to talk
with other students like in the previous cycle. They enjoyed writing the
narrative text based on the topic given.”
(Field notes, on Tuesday, May 13th
, 2014)
2) The Analysis of Students’ Score, Questionnaire, and Students’
Interview.
In this section, the researcher provided the evidence of students‟
improvement in writing skills. Compared to cycle one, the students who reached
the passing grade increased in number. In the first cycle, there were 15 (57.69%)
students who reached the passing grade. Meanwhile, in the second cycle, students
who reached the passing grade were 20 (76.92%) students. The table presented
bellow shows the improvement of the students‟ writing skills in cycle two.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
97
Table 4.3 The Students’ Scores in the Second Cycle
N
o
Student
Number
Cycle 2
Individu
al drafts
Gra
m
Vo
c
Mech
Flu
e
Fo
m
Revised
written
Noted
1 Student 1 73.33 6 5 5 5 5 86.67 Successful
2 Student 2 50.00 4 3 4 3 4 60.00 Failed
3 Student 3 70.00 5 5 5 4 4 76.67 Successful
4 Student 4 63.33 5 6 5 5 6 90.00 Successful
5 Student 5 80.00 4 5 5 5 4 76.67 Successful
6 Student 6 43.33 4 4 4 3 4 63.33 Failed
7 Student 7 73.33 5 5 4 4 4 73.33 Successful
8 Student 8 73.33 5 6 5 4 4 80.00 Successful
9 Student 9 53.33 4 5 5 4 4 73.33 Successful
10 Student 10 50.00 3 4 5 4 3 63.33 Failed
11 Student 11 60.00 3 4 5 3 4 63.33 Failed
12 Student 12 66.67 4 5 4 4 3 66.67 Successful
13 Student 13 43.33 5 3 4 3 4 63.33 Failed
14 Student 14 53.33 5 4 5 5 5 83.33 Successful
15 Student 15 83.33 5 5 5 5 6 90.00 Successful
16 Student 16 70.00 4 4 4 4 4 70.00 Successful
17 Student 17 70.00 5 4 4 4 4 70.00 Successful
18 Student 18 76.67 5 4 5 5 5 80.00 Successful
19 Student 19 63.33 4 4 5 4 5 73.33 Successful
20 Student 20 90.00 6 6 5 6 5 93.33 Successful
21 Student 21 83.33 6 5 5 5 5 86.67 Successful
22 Student 22 70.00 5 5 5 5 5 83.33 Successful
23 Student 23 56.67 5 5 4 3 3 66.67 Successful
24 Student 24 53.33 4 4 4 3 4 63.33 Failed
25 Student 25 66.67 4 5 4 4 4 70.00 Successful
26 Student 26 46.67 4 4 4 4 4 66.67 Successful
Rata- Rata 64.74 74.36
The table showed that the writing skills of VIII F class improved. It could
be seen from the score achieved in each aspect. The explanations are presented as
follows.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
98
a. Grammar
After the researcher implementing the picture series technique, the
grammar aspect in the writing improved. They produced correct sentences with
the correct tenses and correct verb form of the tenses used for narrative texts.
They were able to reduce the grammatical mistakes in cycle two compared to the
preliminary study and also cycle one. In cycle one, there were 2 (7.69%) students
who got 6 points as the maximum point and 10 (38.46%) students who got 5
points. In other words, there were 12 (46. 15%) students who were successful. In
cycle two, there were 3 (11.54%) students who got 6 points and 10 (38.46%)
students who got 5 points. It could be said that 13 (50.00%) students who were
successful in improving their grammar skills.
b. Vocabulary
Students also made improvement in the vocabulary aspect. In cycle one,
there was only 1 (3.85%) student who got 6 point and 14 (53.85%) students who
got 5 points. Meanwhile, in cycle two there were 3 (11.54%) students who got 6
points and 11 (42.30%) students who got 5 points. In other words, 15 (57.69%)
students who considered successful in cycle 1. In cycle two, the percentage of
successful students bit higher. There were 14 (53.85%) students who were
successful.
c. Mechanics
In the mechanics aspect, the students made improvement. In cycle one,
students who got 5 points were 9 (34.62%) students and 15 (57.69%) got 4 points.
Meanwhile, in cycle two, there were 15 (57.69%) students who got 5 points and
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
99
11 (42.30%) students who got 4 points. Both, in cycle one and cycle two, there
was no student who got the maximum points. However, the students still made
progress in this aspect.
d. Fluency
In this case, the students started to make progress since the grammar and
vocabulary also increased. They produce better structure of the sentences
compared to cycle one. In cycle two, the students got a bit higher improvement.
It could be seen that 1 (3.85%) who got 6 points and 8 (30.77%) students who
got 5 points in cycle two. In cycle one, there was no student got 6 point. There
were 6 (23.08%) students who got 5 points in cycle one.
e. Forms
In forms aspect, students showed better performances in organizing the
ideas of the story than in cycle 1. After implementing picture series in the cycle
two, the students made significant progress. There were 2 (7.69%) students who
got 6 points and 7 (29.92%) students who got 5 points. Meanwhile, compared to
cycle one, there was no student who got 6 point and 7 (29.92%) who got 5
points. In other words, in cycle one; there were 7 (29.92%) students who
considered successful in forms aspect. The percentage increased in cycle two.
There were 9 (39.13%) students who considered successful in forms aspect.
However the improvement was not high, the students made their progress.
To strengthen the data finding in cycle two, the researcher also employed
questionnaire from the students (Appendix G). The researcher still employed
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
100
three major parts in the questionnaire: learning activity, learning product, and
students‟ attitude. The result was presented as follows.
1) Learning activity conducted by the researcher in the first cycle
In discussing this topic, the researcher provided five statements. Those
five statements were placed in the beginning of the questionnaire. The researcher
presented the results of the questionnaire using the criteria of the total mean score
counted from the results of this topic. Here are the criteria of the total mean score:
5.00 – 8.75 useless
8.76 – 12.50 less useful
12.51 – 16.25 useful
16.26 – 20.00 very useful
The total mean score of this topic was 17.31. It was considered as the very
useful criterion. The criteria gained in the second cycle showed progress from the
useful criteria into very useful level. The students of class VIII F of SMP Negeri
10 Surakarta accepted the activities which were implemented as the useful
activities. The activities implemented in the first cycle were made in order to
improve students‟ writing skills in composing the narrative texts. They were
practicing jumbled picture series as the pre-writing activities, and also using
picture series to compose the individual drafts. It was proved by 11 students
(42.31%) who agreed and 13 students (50%) who strongly agreed that working in
the group helped them in composing the narrative texts. Meanwhile, there were 2
students (7.69%) disagreed that working in group could help them in composing
the narrative texts.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
101
The interview result indicated the same information of the analysis. Some
of the students in the interview stated that the working in the group helped them in
composing narrative text.
Students 4: “Iya Miss. Waktu belajar kelompok di pertemuan
sebelumnya itu banyak yang rame. Jadi yang mau mengerjakan
terganggu dengan teman-teman yang rame. Kalau
mengerjakan di kelompok di pertemuan yang ketiga lebih enak.
Bisa sharing dengan teman sepasang.”
(Yes, Ms. When we are working in the previous cycle group.
So, when I want to do the tasks, I am disturbed by their noise.
But, in the third meeting, I think that the group discussion is
better. I can share the ideas with my friend in pairs.)
Also, the students said that the group activity was more interesting.
Students 2 : “Aktifitas di grup pada pertemuan yang ketiga
lebih menarik, Miss. Sewaktu diminta untuk mengurutkan
gambar dan paragraf, kita jadi tahu urutan yang benar dan
cerita yang benar.”
(Group activity in the third meeting is more interesting. When
we are asked to arrange the picture series and the paragraphs,
we get to know the correct sequences and the good paragraphs.)
Based on these results, the researcher could sum up that the activities were
applied in the second cycle were useful.
2) Learning products which were obtained by the students
In this part, the researcher presented 6 statements. The researcher provided
statements which were employed to observe students‟ achievement in composing
the narrative texts. The statements discussed the elements in the narrative texts
which must be achieved by the students namely: organizing ideas, using
vocabularies, arranging the generic structure, and also using the appropriate tenses
in the sentences. Here, the researcher made the criteria of the total mean score:
06.00 – 10.50 very low achievement
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
102
10.51 – 15.00 low achievement
15.01 – 19.50 high achievement
19.51 – 24.00 very high achievement
The total mean score of this topic was 21.65. It indicated that the
implementation of the technique (picture series) could help the students to
improve their writing skills. The criterion achieved was high achievement. The
activities and the techniques used in the second cycle could help them to produce
the writing products better than in the preliminary study and also the first cycle. It
could be seen that 18 students (69.23%) agreed, 8 students (30.77%) strongly
agreed, and there was no student who disagreed that picture series made them able
to organize the ideas of the story. The researcher also provided a statement about
finding the new vocabularies to be used in the story. There were 10 students
(38.36%) who agreed 13 students (50%) who strongly agreed, and also 3 students
(11.54%) who stated that picture series could help them in finding new
vocabularies to compose the story. Referring to the generic structure of narrative
text, there were 13 students (50%) who agreed, 9 students (34.62%) who strongly
agreed, and 4 students (15.38%) who disagreed that picture series could help them
in applying the appropriate generic structure of narrative to the story they made.
The researcher also presented a statement related to the use of tense (simple past
tense) to compose the story. There were 9 students (34.62%) who agreed, 11
students (42.31%) who strongly agreed, and 6 students (23.08%) who disagreed
that the use of picture series could help them in understanding the tense used for
composing the story. Moreover, related to the new vocabularies found in the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
103
story, the result was: 12 students (46.15%) agreed, 11 students (42.31%) strongly
agreed, and 3 students (11.54%) disagreed that the use of picture series in the
second cycle could help them in finding the new vocabularies. It was proved by
the statement of a student in the following interview report.
Student 3: “Menurut saya, kemampuan saya dalam menulis
narrative text bertambah, Miss. Dari yang pertemuan satu dan
dua, saya merasa lebih bisa menemukan ide, membuat kalimat
menggunakan vocab baru dan mengerti generic structure di
pertemuan yang ketiga.”
(In my opinion, my writing skills in composing a narrative text
make progress, Miss. I think that in the last meeting, I get better
in finding ideas, making sentences using new vocabularies, and
understanding the generic structure rather than in the first and
second meeting.)
The achievement of this criterion was very high achievement. The results
improved, comparing to the criterion in the first cycle: high achievement. The
picture series implemented in the second cycle could significantly improve their
writing skill in composing a narrative text.
3) Students‟ perception toward the learning process
This was the last topic discussed in the questionnaire. There were 4
statements provided by the researcher. The statements were used to obtain the
data of the students‟ perception toward what the researcher gave in the learning
activities and also their achievements in composing the narrative texts. Here are
the criteria of total mean score in this topic:
4.00 – 7.00 very low
7.01 – 10.00 low
10.01 – 13.00 high
13.01 – 16.00 very high
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
104
The total score of this topic was 13.38. It means that the students of VIII
F class of SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta were willing to improve their writing skills
since the level of the criteria was very high. By using the picture series in
learning composing the narrative texts, most of the students were motivated to
write better than in the first cycle. It could be seen from the questionnaire that 13
students (50%) agreed, 12 students (46.15%) strongly agreed, 1 student (3.85%)
disagreed to the use of picture series. Most of the students also viewed picture
series as an interesting technique to be used since they were not bored with the
activities. It was proved by the results that 13 students (50%) agreed, 11 students
(42.31%) strongly agreed, 2 students (7.96%) disagreed to the fact that picture
series made them not bored of the activities. Moreover, there were 12 students
(46.15%) agreed and 10 students (38.46%) strongly agreed as they felt more
confident and enthusiastic while getting engaged in with the writing activities.
There were only 3 students (11.54%) who disagreed to the statement. While
conducting the interview, the researcher found that students‟ statement supported
the finding above.
Student 1 : “Pembelajarannya menarik. Waktu tugas grup,
aktivitasnya menarik. Itu membuat saya lebih semangat dan
antusias dengan pelajaran bahasa Inggris.”
(The lesson is interesting. When the students are asked to do
the group work, the activity is nice. It makes me feel more
enthusiastic to the English lesson.)
Student 5 : “Ya membuat saya lebih semangat nulisnya.
Walaupun saya tidak suka menulis karangan bahasa Inggris,
tapi kalau pelajarannya menarik seperti tadi, saya jadi lebih
suka.”
(It makes me more enthusiastic in writing the text. Although, I
don‟t like writing an English text, but if the lesson is interesting
like that, I think I like it.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
105
d. Reflection
The implementation of picture series in the second cycle was quite
satisfactory. The researcher was satisfied with the results since there were many
things that went very well in the second cycle. Firstly, the time management
which became a problem in cycle 1 could be handled well in cycle two. The
researcher realized that time management was one of important aspects in
teaching the students. It indicated whether the activitiy, the strategy, or the
technique employed in the classroom research were effective or not. By using the
data instruments which were analyzed in the previous section, the researcher
found that the activities in the group in cycle one should be changed because it
caused the time management went not to run well.
The researcher agreed that enjoyment ought to be one of the important
aims of education. In order to have the students master the language skills,
teachers as a practitioner in the classroom had better make the language activities
enjoyable including teaching and learning process (Tiedt, 1989). The second and
third point of the researcher‟s reflection will use the theory as the guidance.
Second, the grouping activity which had some obstacles in the first cycle, since
the class condition was not conducive, could be also overcome by the researcher.
The modification of the group activity which was done by the researcher made
the students become more enthusiastic. It could be seen when the students were
involved in the teaching- learning process. They were more confident to express
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
106
their opinions in the learning process. It indicated that the students enjoyed
learning English, particularly in composing the narrative texts.
Third, the researcher also noticed that the students were satisfied with the
picture series which were distributed to them. Since in the previous meeting the
students got the picture series which were attached on the whiteboard, in the
second cycle they could use the picture series for themselves. They gained more
ideas based on the picture series. It made the students able to produce more
sentences for the story.
Here, the researcher summed up that the students made very good progress
in the second cycle. The activities went well in the second cycle. The students
showed significant improvements from their work. It indicated that they could
achieve the indicators expected by the researcher.
3. Lesson Learned of the Implementation Picture Series Technique to
Improve Students’ Writing Skills
As clarified in chapter two, the aim of conducting classroom action
research (CAR) is to improve classroom practice in the school (Richards, 2005;
Ary et al, 2010; Fraenkel & Wallen, 2009). The teachers as the practitioners of
the classroom action research conduct the action as the reflective practice (Burns,
2010). Therefore, the action as the implementation of certain techniques used in
the classroom should be evaluated in the reflection form.
This study employed text-based approach or known as genre-based
approach to view the goal of the research. The researcher focused on the need of
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
107
the students in composing certain text. The primary concern is what learners do
with the language through the text (Feez & Joyce, 2002). Text-based approach is
used as the approach to answer the questions of this study.
The researcher conducted this classroom action research (CAR) in class
VIII F of SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta. The focus of the study was to improve
students‟ writing skill in composing the narrative texts. The researcher, therefore,
needed some steps to be conducted in the research. The aim was to achieve the
goal of the research. The steps had been clarified in chapter 3.
The researcher proposed picture series technique as the teaching and
learning strategy to the students in order to improve their writing skills. To obtain
the very first data of the classroom, the researcher conducted a preliminary study.
The information gained in the preliminary study was used as the guidance in
arranging the plans of cycle one. In conducting cycle one, the researcher
employed several instruments to record the classroom practice. The researcher
reflected the results of cycle one. The time management, group activity, and the
way of presenting picture series to the students became the points noted by the
researcher. The reflection guided the researcher to conduct the new strategy of
cycle two.
By implementing the new strategy of the activities and the technique using
text-based approach in cycle two, the research concluded that the implementation
of cycle two was satisfactory. The students‟ achievement and data recorded in
the instruments as described in the previous sections did support the result that
the classroom action research (CAR) which was conducted by the researcher was
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
108
satisfactory. For instance, the observation checklist and field notes helped the
researcher to observe the improvements. Moreover, the writing scoring rubric
showed the improvements in each aspect of writing skills. It was supported by
the questionnaire and also the interview‟ results which were indicated that the
improvements of the writing skill of the students.
Finally, all of the research findings presented in this chapter gave
evidences that the researcher as the practitioner of the classroom action research
(CAR) conducted the action research successfully. The researcher conducted the
successful changes in order to improve students‟ writing skills in the study by
implementing the strategy of teaching; the technique and the activity so that the
learning goal could be achieved.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
109
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
In this chapter, there are two parts that will be discussed. The first part is
the conclusion of the research. The second part provides suggestions for the
English teachers who will implement picture series as teaching writing technique
and also for other researchers who will conduct the same type of research.
A. Conclusions
This research was conducted to find out the appropriate technique to
improve students‟ writing skills of the eight grade students of SMP Negeri 10
Surakarta. There were two problems in this research: “to what extent picture
series help class VIII F of SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta in writing narrative text and
how is the use of picture series implemented in writing narrative text toward
class VIII F of SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta to improve their writing skills.”
In conducting this research, the researcher employed several research
instruments to collect the data. The instruments were observation sheets, field
notes, questionnaires, interviews, and students‟ drafts. These instruments were
used to support each other in order to help the researcher in monitoring the
students‟ achievement and to know whether the technique applied was
appropriate or not.
The researcher also used writing scoring rubric to assess the students‟
drafts and the revised written. The scores of the students‟ writing results became
the major data of this research. The researcher assessed students‟ writing
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
110
performances by using the writing scoring rubric. The researcher employed the
passing grade of English subject which has specified by the English teachers of
this school. The students‟ writing performances, whether successful or not, were
determined by the passing grade. The score of the passing grade was 65.
There were two cycles in this classroom action research. In the first cycle,
the researcher conducted two meetings. In the second cycle, the researcher
conducted one meeting. The picture series were used in the first and second
cycle.
In the first cycle, most of the students improved their writing score. The
class average score improved in cycle one. The students who did not reach the
passing grade in the preliminary study decreased in the first cycle. But, according
to the field notes and the questionnaire results, it was shown that certain activities
in the first cycle was not effective to be applied in the classroom. In the second
cycle, the researcher still implemented the picture series. The activities in cycle
one were revised. The researcher changed the technique in giving the picture
series to the students. The picture series were given one by one to the students.
As a result in cycle two, the students who reached the passing grade increased
from the first cycle. The class average score also increased from the previous
cycle. The results of the field notes and also the questionnaire showed that their
skills in writing improved.
The researcher concluded that the picture series technique could improve
students‟ writing skills. As clarified in the previous chapter, the researcher had
presented the result of the research instruments were employed indicate several
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
111
improvements. The students‟ aspects in writing skills improved. It was presented
by the students‟ achievement scores showed that they got better score in cycle
one and cycle two. Students made improvement in their writing elements:
organizing ideas, finding new vocabularies and applying them into sentences,
using appropriate generic structure for composing the text, and knowing the tense
which used and applying the tense for writing the text. The students‟
achievement could be seen from their scores in the first and second cycle. When
the students could pass the passing grade, the researcher considered that the
students could make a progress. Another indication which showed that the
students‟ writing skills improved was that the students‟ perception toward
writing also improved. It could be seen through the results of research
instruments were employed such as questionnaire, field notes, and also interview.
The use of picture series technique had a great influence on the
improvement of students‟ writing skills. Picture series really helped the students
to be able to organize the ideas, to find the new vocabularies, to apply the
appropriate generic structure, and the use of simple past tense to write the
narrative text. Also, by applying picture series, the researcher is able to build
good atmosphere in which the students like the activities so that they enjoy
writing in the classroom. It comes to the conclusion that picture series technique
could improve the writing skills for the VIII F class of SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta
during the writing activity.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
112
B. Recommendations
Based on the research‟s findings, picture series became the appropriate
technique to improve writing skills to VIII F class of SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta.
Therefore, there are suggestions for the English teachers and also the future
researchers who want to conduct a study on the similar topic. The suggestions are
presented as follows:
1. For the English Teachers
It is suggested that the English teachers who want to teach their students
about writing narrative texts use picture series as a technique. The English
teachers can get the benefits which have been explained in the results and the
discussion of this study. Meanwhile, there are some suggestions which have to be
prepared. The English teachers should provide well- prepared picture series. The
size of the picture series, the variety of the picture series (colored picture series
or black and white picture series), and the way the teachers distribute the picture
series (attached on the whiteboard, presented using Liquid Crystal Display/ LCD,
or given to each student) will affect students‟ writing result. The English teachers
also should arrange well- planned activities to the students so that they can
engage with the picture series well.
2. For the Future Researchers
The future researchers who would like to conduct a study on the similar
topic may find the new ways to improve students writing skills through the use of
picture series technique. They could explore this issue by conducting more
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
113
research with other participants of the research. The future researchers also could
modify the picture series and the activities so they can be more interesting.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
114
REFERENCES
Acero, V., Javier, E., & Castro, H. (2007). Principles of teaching I. Manila: Rex
Book Store, Inc.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L., Razavieh, A., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to the
research education. Scarborough, ON: Nelson Education, Ltd.
Boone, H.N., & Boone, D.A. (2012). Analyzing Likert Data. Journal of
Extension. 50 (2), 1-5.
Retrieved from http://www.joe.org/joe/2012april/tt2.php.
Bright, J.A. & McGregor, G. P. (1973). Teaching English as a second language:
Theory and techniques for the secondary stage. London: Longman Group
Brown, J.D. & Rogers, T.S. (2002). Doing second language research. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Brown, H.D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language
pedagogy. Bergen County, NJ: Pearson Education ESL.
Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teacher.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide
for practitioners. New York: Routledge.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education
(5th
ed). New York: Routledge.
Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed
approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Darmadi, K. (1996). Meningkatkan kemampuan menulis panduan untuk
mahasiswa dan calon guru. Yogyakarta: Andi offset.
Dhand, H. (2008). Techniques of teaching. New Delhi: S.B. Nangia APH
Publishing Corporation.
Doyle. P. G., Goh, C.C.M., & Zhang, L. J. (2004). Language education concepts:
A guide for English language teachers. Singapore: Pearson Education Inc.
Dunn, M. & Finley, S. (2010). Children‟s struggles with the writing process
exploring storytelling, visual arts, and keyboarding to promote narrative
story writing. Multicultural Education,18 (1),33-42. Retrieved from :
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ916844.pdf.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
115
Elbow, P. (1998). Writing with power: Teaching for mastering the writing
process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fadlillah, M. (2014). Implementasi kurikulum 2013 dalam pembelajaran SD/MI,
SMP/MTs, dan SMA/MA. Yogyakarta: Ar- Ruzz Media.
Feez, S. & Joyce, H. (2002). Text based- syllabus design. Sydney: Macquarie
University Press.
Foster, P. (1996). Observing schools: A methodology guide. Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE Publications, Inc.
Fraenkel, R. & Wallen, E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in
education (7th
ed). Boston: McGraw- Hill Higher Education.
Gerot, L. &Wignell, P. (1995). Making sense of functional grammar: An
introductory workbook. Cammeray: Antipodean Educational Enterprises.
Guzzetti, J.B. (2002). Literacy in America: An encyclopedia of history, theory,
and practice. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC- CLIO, Inc.
Harmer, J. (2004). How to teach writing. Selangor: Pearson Education.
Heinich, R. (1982). Instructional media and the new technologies of instruction.
Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and sons.
Hopkins, D. (2008). A teacher’s guide to classroom research. New York:
McGraw- Hill Higher Education
Hughes, A. (1989). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Johnson, B. & Christensen, L. (2012). Educational research: Qualitative,
quantitative, and mixed approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. (1988).The action research planner. Burwood,
VIC: Deakin University Press.
Koshy, V. (2005). Action research for improving practice: A practice guide.
Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Knapp, P. & Watkins, M. (2005). Genres, text, grammar: Technologies for
teaching and assessing writing. Sydney: University of New South Wales
Press.
Kreidler, C. J. (1968). Visual aids for teaching English to speaker of other
language. Washington, D.C.: United States Information Agency.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
116
McDonough, J. & McDonough, S. (2014). Research methods for English
language teachers. Abingdon, OX: Routdlege.
Mckay, S.L. (2002). The reflective teacher: A guide to classroom action research.
Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
Mills, G. E. (2011). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. Boston:
Pearson Education, Inc.
Mulyasa, H. E. (2013). Pengembangan dan implementasi kurikulum 2013.
Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya
Nation, I.S.P. (2009). Teaching ESL/ EFL reading and writing. New York:
Routledge.
Norton, S. M. (2013). Competency-based leadership: A guide for high
performance in the role of school principal. Plymouth: R&L Education.
Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English language teaching. New York: McGraw-
Hill Companies.
Priyana, J., Irjayanti, A., & Renitasari, V. (2008). SCAFFOLDING: English for
junior high school students. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan, Departemen
Pendidikan Nasional.
Raimes, A. (1983). Techniques in teaching writing. Oxford: Oxford University
Press
Richards, J. (2005). Professional development for language teachers: Strategies
for teacher learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sloan, P., & Sloan, S. (2013). Early learning friends: Teacher guide. Balcatta:
R.I.C. Publications, Inc.
Tiedt, I.M. (1989). Writing from topic to evaluation. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Tomal, D. (2010). Action research for educators. Lanham, MD: Rowmand &
Littlefield Education.
Venkateswaran, S. (1995). Principles of teaching English, 1E. New Delhi: Vikas
Publishing House Pvt, Ltd.
Wardiman, A., Jahur, M., & Djusma, M. (2008). English in focus 1: For grade
VIII junior high school (SMP/ MTs). Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan,
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
117
Zepeda, S. J. (2014). Job-embedded professional development: Support,
collaboration, and learning in school. New York: Routledge.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
118
APPENDIX A
Covering letter for the Headmaster of
SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
120
APPENDIX B
Research Official Statement from
SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
122
APPENDIX C
Research Instruments
1. Observation Sheet
2. Field Notes
3. Writing Scoring Rubric
4. Questionnaire
5. Interview Guide
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
123
1. Observation Sheet
OBSERVATION SHEET ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE TEACHER
School :
Class :
Day :
Time :
Please give check mark (v) on the right column based on teacher‟s activity during
the observation.
No Statements Yes No
1. The teacher checks the students‟ readiness to follow the
lesson.
2. The teacher gives clear instruction to the students.
3. The teacher uses English most of the time.
4. The teacher delivers the materials in accordance with the
lesson plan.
5. The teacher manages the time well.
6. The teacher masters the material well.
7. The teacher explains the material clearly.
8. The teacher uses any media.
9. The teacher guides the students in writing narrative text
using picture series.
10. The teacher responds students‟ questions well.
11. The teacher gives positive reinforcement.
12. The teacher is able to manage the class.
13. The teacher uses clear voice.
14. The teacher is enthusiastic in teaching the lesson.
15. The teacher gets the students involve in teaching- learning
process
16. The teacher makes reflection in the end of the lesson.
Observer,
……………………………..
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
124
OBSERVATION SHEET ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE STUDENTS
School :
Class :
Day :
Time :
Please give check mark (v) on the right column based on students‟ activity during
the observation.
No Statements Yes No
1. The students are ready to follow the lesson.
2. The students understand the instruction given by the teacher.
3. The students use English most of the time to communicate with
their fellows or teacher.
4. The students could perceive teacher‟s explanation well.
5. The students do the task given by the teacher seriously.
6. The students actively involve during the lesson.
7. The students actively involve during the group discussion.
8. The students understand the media used in the classroom.
9. The students are enthusiastic with the use of picture series as the
media.
10. The students are motivated to use dictionary to find the difficult
word.
11. The students make notes during the lesson.
12. The students feel happy during the lesson.
13. The students feel bored during the lesson.
14. The students get difficulty in looking at the picture series.
15. The students get confused when do the task given by the teacher.
16. The students look enjoy when writing the text.
Observer
………………………………..
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
125
2. Field Notes
Field Notes
Please write down what is happening in the classroom activities during the
teaching and learning process.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
126
3. Writing Scoring Rubric
This scoring scale is based on Anderson‟s scale which was written in
Hughes book (1989, p. 91-93)
Grammar
6. Few (if any) noticeable errors of grammar or word order.
5. Some errors of grammar or word order which do not, however, interfere with
comprehension.
4. Errors of grammar or word order fairly frequent; occasional re-reading necessary
for full comprehension.
3. Errors of grammar or word order frequent; efforts of interpretation sometimes
required on reader‟s part.
2. Errors of grammar or word order very frequent; reader often has to rely on own
interpretation
1. Errors of grammar or word order so severe as to make comprehension virtually
impossible.
Vocabulary
6. Use of vocabulary and idiom rarely (if at all) distinguishable from that of
educated native writer
5. Occasionally uses inappropriate terms or relies on circumlocutions; expressions
of ideas hardly impaired
4. Uses wrong or inappropriate words fairly frequently; expressions of ideas may
be limited because of inadequate vocabulary.
3. Limited vocabulary and frequent errors clearly hinder expressions of ideas
2. Vocabulary so limited and so frequently misused that reader must often rely own
interpretation
1. Vocabulary limitations so extreme as to make comprehension virtually
impossible.
Mechanics
6. Few (if any) noticeable lapses in punctuation or spelling
5. Occasional lapses in punctuation or which do not, however, interfere with
comprehension.
4. Errors in punctuation or spelling order fairly frequent; occasional re-reading
necessary for full comprehension.
3. Frequent errors in spelling or punctuation; lead sometimes to obscurity.
2. Errors in punctuation or spelling order so frequent; reader often has to rely on
own interpretation
1. Errors in punctuation or spelling order so severe as to make comprehension
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
127
virtually impossible
Fluency (style and ease of communication)
6. Choice of structure and vocabulary consistently appropriate; like that of
educated native writer.
5. Occasional lack of consistency in choice of structure and vocabulary which does
not, however, impair overall ease of communication.
4. „Patchy‟, with some structures or vocabulary items noticeably inappropriate to
general style.
3. Structures or vocabulary items sometimes not only inappropriate but also
misused; little sense of ease if communication
2. Communication often impaired by completely inappropriate or misused
structures or vocabulary items
1. A „hotch- potch‟ of half-learned misused structures and vocabulary items
rendering communication almost impossible.
Form (organization)
6. Highly organized; clear progression of ideas well linked; like educated native
writer.
5. Material well organized, links could occasionally be clearer but communication
not impaired
4. Some lack of organization; re-reading required for clarification of ideas.
3. Little or no attempt at connectivity, though reader can deduce some
organization.
2. Individual ideas may be clear, but very difficult to deduce connection between
them.
1. Lack of organization so serve that communication is seriously impaired.
SCORE: Gramm _______+ Voc_______+ Mech_______+ Form______
=_________
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
128
4. Questionnaire
KUESIONER
CYCLE 1
Berdasarkan proses belajar- mengajar selama penelitian, isilah kuisioner
di bawah ini dengan jujur dan tepat. Centanglah () pada bagian yang disediakan,
keterangan untuk kolom 1: sangat tidak setuju; 2: tidak setuju; 3: setuju; 4:
sangat setuju
No Statement 1 2 3 4
Learning activity
1 Handout yang diberikan oleh guru sangat membantu saya dala
memahami karangan berbahasa Inggris narrative.
2 Bekerja dalam kelompok membantu saya untuk menulis
karangan berbahasa Inggris narrative sebelum menulis secara
individual.
3 Bermain game untuk pre- writing membantu saya untuk mulai
menyusun karangan berbahasa Inggris narrative.
4 Penggunaan gambar berseri dapat digunakan sebagai media
yang tepat dalam menulis karangan berbahasa Ingris narrative.
5 Gambar seri yang diberikan oleh guru sudah cukup jelas.
Learning Products
6 Saya dapat menangkap dengan jelas maksud dari gambar
berseri yang disajikan yang diberikan oleh guru.
7 Penggunaan gambar berseri membuat saya dapat menemukan
dan mengembangkan ide dalam menulis karangan berbahasa
Inggris berbentuk narrative
8 Penggunaan gambar berseri membuat saya mudah menemukan
kosa kata baru dalam bahasa Inggris
9 Penggunaan gambar berseri membuat saya mampu menyusun
cerita sesuai dengan generic structure narrative yang runtut
dan benar
10 Penggunaan gambar berseri membuat saya memahami konsep
tenses dan menggunakannya dalam penulisan karanagan
berbahasa Inggris bentuk narrative
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
129
11 Penggunaan gambar berseri yang digunakan membuat
saya lebih berpikir kreatif dalam menyusun karangan
berbahasa Inggris narrative text
Students’ perception
12 Penggunaan gambar berseri dalam menulis karangan
berbahasa Inggris bentuk narrative memotivasi saya
untuk menulis.
13 Penggunaan gambar berseri membuat saya tidak merasa
bosan dalam mengikuti aktifitas di kelas.
14 Penggunaan gambar berseri membuat saya lebih percaya
diri dalam menulis karangan bentuk narrative.
15 Penggunaan gambar berseri membuat saya lebih
bersemangat dan antusias dalam menulis karangan
berbahasa Inggris narrative.
~Terimakasih~ Thank you~ Maturnuwun
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
130
KUESIONER
CYCLE 2
Berdasarkan proses belajar- mengajar selama penelitian, isilah kuisioner di
bawah ini dengan jujur dan tepat. Centanglah () pada bagian yang disediakan,
keterangan untuk kolom 1: sangat tidak setuju; 2: tidak setuju; 3: setuju; 4:
sangat setuju
No Statement 1 2 3 4
Learning activity
1 Handout yang diberikan oleh guru membantu saya untuk
mengulang materi yang sudah diberikan sebelumnya.
2 Bekerja dalam kelompok melalui jumbled picture series
membantu saya menemukan urutan cerita yang runtut dan
benar
3 Bekerja dalam kelompok membantu saya memperdalam materi
past tense terutama penggunaan to be dan verb 2 dalam
menyusun karangan berbahasa Inggris narrative.
4 Penggunaan gambar berseri yang dibagikan masing-masing
lebih membantu saya dalam menulis karangan berbahasa
Inggris narrative daripada yang ditempel di papan tulis.
5 Gambar berseri yang diberikan oleh guru sudah cukup jelas.
Learning Products
6 Saya dapat menangkap dengan jelas maksud dari gambar
berseri yang disajikan yang diberikan oleh guru.
7
Saya dapat lebih mudah menemukan dan mengembangkan ide
dalam menulis karangan berbahasa Inggris bentuk narrative
menggunakan gambar berseri yang ada diberikan langsung
(tidak ditempel di papan tulis)
8
Saya dapat dengan mudah membuat cerita sesuai dengan
generic structure narrative yang runtut dan benar
menggunakan gambar berseri yang ada diberikan langsung
(tidak ditempel di papan tulis)
9
Saya lebih memahami konsep tenses yang digunakan dalam
penulisan karangan berbahasa Inggris bentuk narrative dengan
menggunakan gambar berseri yang ada diberikan langsung
(tidak ditempel di papan tulis)
10 Saya dapat menemukan kosa kata baru dalam bahasa Inggris
dengan menggunakan gambar berseri yang ada diberikan
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
131
langsung (tidak ditempel di papan tulis)
11 Saya dapat berpikir lebih kreatif dalam menyusun teks
berbahasa Inggris narrative dengan media gambar berseri yang
ada diberikan langsung (tidak ditempel di papan tulis)
Students’ perception
12 Penggunaan gambar berseri dalam menulis karangan
berbahasa Inggris bentuk narrative memotivasi saya untuk
menulis.
13 Penggunaan gambar berseri membuat saya tidak merasa bosan
dalam mengikuti aktifitas di kelas.
14 Penggunaan gambar berseri membuat saya lebih percaya diri
dalam menulis karangan bentuk narrative.
15 Penggunaan gambar berseri membuat saya lebih bersemangat
dan antusias dalam menulis karangan berbahasa Inggris
narrative.
~Terimakasih~ Thank you~ Maturnuwun
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
132
5. Interview Guide
INTERVIEW GUIDE
This guideline will be used to conduct the interview for the students who
had been chosen. This interview is employed to obtain the information to support
the result of this research. It aims to see students‟ response of the use picture
series technique for improving students‟ writing skills in composing narrative
text.
1. What is your opinion about writing English text? How about your
writing skills right now?
2. How about your writing skills in composing narrative text? Do you
find difficulties in composing narrative text? Explain further.
3. What do you think about picture series technique as the media in
composing narrative text?
4. What do you think about the activities which were done during the
teaching and learning process?
5. What is your opinion about your writing skills after the
implementation of picture series technique? Are there any changes?
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
133
APPENDIX D
Lesson Planand Teaching Material
1. Lesson Plan and Teaching Material Cycle 1
2. Lesson Plan and Teaching Material Cycle 2
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
134
LESSON PLAN
Cycle 1
School : SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta
Subject : English
Class/ Semester : VIII/ 2
Skill Focus : Writing
Time Allotment : 2 X 40 minutes
A. Competence Standard
12. To express the meaning of simple short functional written texts and
essay in the forms of recount and narrative to interact with surrounding
environment.
B. Basic Competence
12.2. To express the meaning and rhetoric steps in simple short essay in
written language accurately, fluently and acceptable to interact with
surrounding environment in the form of narrative.
C. Indicators
Cognitive
1. Students are able to identify the elements of narrative text
2. Students are able to identify the generic structure of a narrative text
3. Students are able to identify the language features in a narrative
text
4. Students are able to use past tense sentences in writing a narrative
text correctly
Affective
1. Students are able to arrange the narrative text in group activity
2. Students are able to respond and give opinion in arranging the
narrative text in group.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
135
3. Students are able to participate actively and produce the
narrative text
Psychomotor
1. Students are able to produce good narrative text.
D. Classroom Activities
MEETING ONE
Time Teacher activities Students activities
Pre Learning Activities
2‟ Teacher asks a student to lead the prayer and
greet the students.
The students pray
together and respond the
teacher‟s greeting.
2‟ Teacher asks the students about stories they
know from their own hometowns or ethnics.
The students mention
some titles of stories
from their ethnics or
culture they know.
1‟ Teacher asks the students to guess about what
they are going to learn today.
The students guess
about what they are
going to learn today
Whilst Learning Activities
20‟
Teacher reviews on the communicative
purpose, generic structure, and tense of
narrative text briefly. Review will be done
orally.
The students pay
attention to the teacher‟s
review. Students also get
involved in the review
by answering the
questions orally.
Teacher distributes the handout. There is a
model of narrative text then the students are
The students read the
model of narrative text
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
136
asked to identify the generic structure and
answer the questions followed by the text.
and answer the
questions based of the
text.
15‟
Teacher asks the students to make group of
four or five. Then, the teacher will give a game
called STORY CHAIN. The teacher will give
the students a sentence of a story: Golden
Cucumber (Timun Mas). The first sentence
given by the researcher was “Long time ago,
there lived an old widow named Mbok Rondo
who had no child.”
Then, the teacher asks the students to continue
the story. Each students will get their turns to
continue
The students would
continue the sentence.
After finishing the
game, the researcher
invited the students to
read together their
written text in groups.
35‟ Teacher discuss about a title of story which
will be given as the individual work, orally.
Then, the teacher attaches the picture series of
the story on the whiteboard.
The story is Three Little Pig
Teacher distributes a blank paper for each
student to write their individual draft.
Students get involved in
the discussion.
Students work on their
individual draft.
Post Learning Activities
1‟ Teacher asks the students to submit their
individual draft.
Students submit their
individual draft.
3‟ Teacher reviews what they have learnt today
by asking questions orally
Students review what
they have learnt today
by answering the
questions orally.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
137
1‟ Teacher end the lesson.
E. Sources and Teaching Media
Teacher module which contains discussion, exercises and instruction for the
project
White board
Board marker
Picture series
F. Assessment
Form: draft of narrative text
Rubric of scoring:
This scoring scale is based on Anderson‟s scale which was written in
Hughes book (1989: 91-93)
Grammar
6. Few (if any) noticeable errors of grammar or word order.
5. Some errors of grammar or word order which do not, however,
interfere with comprehension.
4. Errors of grammar or word order fairly frequent; occasional re-reading
necessary for full comprehension.
3. Errors of grammar or word order frequent; efforts of interpretation
sometimes required on reader‟s part.
2. Errors of grammar or word order very frequent; reader often has to
rely on own interpretation
1. Errors of grammar or word order so severe as to make comprehension
virtually impossible.
Vocabulary
6. Use of vocabulary and idiom rarely (if at all) distinguishable from that
of educated native writer
5. Occasionally uses inappropriate terms or relies on circumlocutions;
expressions of ideas hardly impaired
4. Uses wrong or inappropriate words fairly frequently; expressions of
ideas may be limited because of inadequate vocabulary.
3. Limited vocabulary and frequent errors clearly hinder expressions of
ideas
2. Vocabulary so limited and so frequently misused that reader must
often rely own interpretation
1. Vocabulary limitations so extreme as to make comprehension virtually
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
138
impossible.
Mechanics
6. Few (if any) noticeable lapses in punctuation or spelling
5. Occasional lapses in punctuation or which do not, however, interfere
with comprehension.
4. Errors in punctuation or spelling order fairly frequent; occasional re-
reading necessary for full comprehension.
3. Frequent errors in spelling or punctuation; lead sometimes to
obscurity.
2. Errors in punctuation or spelling order so frequent; reader often has to
rely on own interpretation
1. Errors in punctuation or spelling order so severe as to make
comprehension virtually impossible
Fluency (style and ease of communication)
6. Choice of structure and vocabulary consistently appropriate; like that
of educated native writer.
5. Occasional lack of consistency in choice of structure and vocabulary
which does not, however, impair overall ease of communication.
4. „Patchy‟, with some structures or vocabulary items noticeably
inappropriate to general style.
3. Structures or vocabulary items sometimes not only inappropriate but
also misused; little sense of ease if communication
2. Communication often impaired by completely inappropriate or
misused structures or vocabulary items
1. A „hotch- potch‟ of half-learned misused structures and vocabulary
items rendering communication almost impossible.
Form (organization)
6. Highly organized; clear progression of ideas well linked; like educated
native writer.
5. Material well organized, links could occasionally be clearer but
communication not impaired
4. Some lack of organization; re-reading required for clarification of
ideas.
3. Little or no attempt at connectivity, though reader can deduce some
organization.
2. Individual ideas may be clear, but very difficult to deduce connection
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
139
between them.
1. Lack of organization so serve that communication is seriously
impaired.
SCORE: Gramm _______+ Voc_______+ Mech_______+ Form______
=_________
G. Materials:
Handout (Attachment 1)
Picture series (Attachment 2)
Teaching Material
Attachment 1
NARRATIVE TEXT A. Definition, Communicative purpose and Types of narrative text
Narrative text is a description of a series of events, either real or
imaginary, that is written or told in order to entertain people.
Communicative purpose of narrative text is to amuse or entertain the
reader.
Types of narrative text:
Fictional narrative presents an imaginary narrator‟s account
of a story that happened in an imaginary world. (fairy tales,
folklore or folktales, horror stories, fables, legends, myths, and
science fictions)
Nonfictional narrative presents a real life person‟s account of
a real-life story. (historical narrative, personal experience) B. Generic Structure
Orientation : It is about the opening paragraph where the characters
of the story are introduced. Tells the reader about the background of
the story (time, places).
Complication : Where the problems in the story developed.
Resolution : Where the problems in the story is solved. The problem
of the story ends, it can be happy ending or bad/ sad ending.
C. Language Features
Using past tense
Using adjective to describe characters
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
140
Using direct and reported speech to present the dialogue.
D. Example of narrative text
Read the text below. Try to identify the generic structure. Underlying the
past tense sentences, adjective clauses and also direct and reported speech
from the text.
Generic
structure Text
The Ugly Duckling
One upon time, a mother duck sat on her eggs. She felt tired of
sitting on them. She just wished the eggs would break out.
Several days later, she got her wish. The eggs cracked and some
cute little ducklings appeared. "Peep, peep" the little ducklings cried.
"Quack, quack" their mother greeted in return.
However the largest egg had not cracked. The mother duck sat
on it for several days. Finally, it cracked and a huge ugly duckling
waddled out. The mother duck looked at him in surprise. He was so
big and very gray. He didn't look like the others at all. He was like a
turkey
When the mother duck brought the children to the pond for their
first swimming lesson. The huge grey duckling splashed and paddled
about just as nicely as the other ducklings did. "That is not a turkey
chick. He is my very own son and quite handsome" the mother said
proudly
However, the other animals didn't agree. They hissed and made
fun of him day by day. Even his own sisters and brothers were very
unkind. "You are very ugly" they quacked.
The little poor duckling was very unhappy. "I wish I looked like
them" he thought to himself. One day, the ugly duckling run away
and hid in the bushes. The sad duckling lived alone through the cold
and snow winter. Finally the spring flowers began to bloom. While
he was swimming in the pond, he saw three large white swans
swimming toward him. "Oh, dear. these beautiful birds will laugh
and peck me too" he said to himself.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
141
But the swans did not attack him. Instead, they swam around him
and stroked him with their bills. As the ugly duckling bent his neck to
speak to them, he saw his reflection in the water. He could not
believe his eyes. "I am not an ugly duckling but a beautiful swan" he
exclaimed.
He was very happy. From that day on, he swam and played with his
new friends and was happier than he had never been.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
142
E. Group work!
STORY CHAIN
Make a group consists of 4-5 members. Discuss the story entitled “The
Golden Cucumber (Timun Mas) ”with your friends. The teacher will give
you a sentence orally. When you get your turns, you have to continue the
story.
Bank words!
The followings are the vocabularies that can be used to make the story.
Petani : farmer
Raksas : monster
Gua : cave
Menanam : plant
Remaja : teenager
Menagihjanji : ask the promise
Melarikandiri : escape, get away
Jarumbambu : bamboo needles
Bijimentimun : seeds of cucumber
Terasi : shrimp paste
Garam : salt
Senjata :weapon
Menyebar : spread
Mengejar : chase
Lumpur : mud
Tenggelam : sink, drown
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
143
Attachment 2: A set of picture series of THREE LITTLE PIGS
http://dbsenk.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/3-pigs-sequence.jpg
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
144
LESSON PLAN
Cycle 1
School : SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta
Subject : English
Class/ Semester : VIII/ 2
Skill Focus : Writing
Time Allotment : 2 X 40 minutes
A. Competence Standard
12. To express the meaning of simple short functional written texts and
essay in the forms of recount and narrative to interact with surrounding
environment.
B. Basic Competence
12.2. To express the meaning and rhetoric steps in simple short essay in
written language accurately, fluently and acceptable to interact with
surrounding environment in the form of narrative.
C. Indicators
Cognitive
1. Students are able to identify the elements of narrative text
2. Students are able to identify the generic structure of a narrative text
3. Students are able to identify the language features in a narrative
text
4. Students are able to use past tense sentences in writing a narrative
text correctly
Affective
1. Students are able to arrange the narrative text in group activity
2. Students are able to respond and give opinion in arranging the
narrative text in group.
3. Sudents are able to participate actively and produce the narrative
text
Psychomotor
1. Students are able to produce good narrative text.
D. Classroom Activities
MEETING TWO
Time Teacher activities Students activities
Pre Learning Activities
2‟ Teacher asks a student to lead the prayer and The students pray
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
145
greet the students. together and respond the
teacher‟s greeting.
3‟ Teacher asks the students about the previous
lesson.
The students orally share
about the previous
lesson.
Main Learning Activities
10‟ Teacher reviews on the previous students‟
drafts.
Teacher will go deeply on the part of the
students‟ mistake: the use of past tenses. The
teacher distributes worksheet of simple past
tense exercise.
Students learn more to
the use of past tense.
Students work on the
exercise.
20‟ The students worked in the group. The groups
were the same as in the previous
meeting.Teacher gives exercises of past tense
to the students.
The teacher gives a narrative text The Story of
Cinde Laras. The students are asked to identify
the grammatical errors of the text.
Students work on the
exercise.
40‟
Teacher sticks the pictures which have already
arranged on the white board. Then, teacher
will ask the students to write down the story
based on the pictures.
This is an individual task. The students are
asked to make their own draft of narrative text.
The students take a look
at the pictures on the
white board.
Based on the pictures,
the students try to make
their own narrative text.
The students check their
draft and submit the
draft.
Post Learning Activities
1‟ Teacher asks the students to submit their
individual draft.
Students submit their
individual draft.
3‟ Teacher reviews what they have learnt today
by asking questions orally
Students review what
they have learnt today by
answering the questions
orally.
1‟ Teacher end the lesson.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
146
E. Sources and Teaching Media
Teacher module which contains discussion, exercises and instruction for the
project
White board
Board marker
Picture series
F. Assessment
Form: draft of narrative text
This scoring scale is based on Anderson‟s scale which was written in
Hughes book (1989, p. 91-93)
Grammar
6. Few (if any) noticeable errors of grammar or word order.
5. Some errors of grammar or word order which do not, however, interfere with
comprehension.
4. Errors of grammar or word order fairly frequent; occasional re-reading necessary for
full comprehension.
3. Errors of grammar or word order frequent; efforts of interpretation sometimes
required on reader‟s part.
2. Errors of grammar or word order very frequent; reader often has to rely on own
interpretation
1. Errors of grammar or word order so severe as to make comprehension virtually
impossible.
Vocabulary
6. Use of vocabulary and idiom rarely (if at all) distinguishable from that of educated
native writer
5. Occasionally uses inappropriate terms or relies on circumlocutions; expressions of
ideas hardly impaired
4. Uses wrong or inappropriate words fairly frequently; expressions of ideas may be
limited because of inadequate vocabulary.
3. Limited vocabulary and frequent errors clearly hinder expressions of ideas
2. Vocabulary so limited and so frequently misused that reader must often rely own
interpretation
1. Vocabulary limitations so extreme as to make comprehension virtually impossible.
Mechanics
6. Few (if any) noticeable lapses in punctuation or spelling
5. Occasional lapses in punctuation or which do not, however, interfere with
comprehension.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
147
4. Errors in punctuation or spelling order fairly frequent; occasional re-reading
necessary for full comprehension.
3. Frequent errors in spelling or punctuation; lead sometimes to obscurity.
2. Errors in punctuation or spelling order so frequent; reader often has to rely on own
interpretation
1. Errors in punctuation or spelling order so severe as to make comprehension virtually
impossible
Fluency (style and ease of communication)
6. Choice of structure and vocabulary consistently appropriate; like that of educated
native writer.
5. Occasional lack of consistency in choice of structure and vocabulary which does not,
however, impair overall ease of communication.
4. „Patchy‟, with some structures or vocabulary items noticeably inappropriate to
general style.
3. Structures or vocabulary items sometimes not only inappropriate but also misused;
little sense of ease if communication
2. Communication often impaired by completely inappropriate or misused structures or
vocabulary items
1. A „hotch- potch‟ of half-learned misused structures and vocabulary items rendering
communication almost impossible.
Form (organization)
6. Highly organized; clear progression of ideas well linked; like educated native writer.
5. Material well organized, links could occasionally be clearer but communication not
impaired
4. Some lack of organization; re-reading required for clarification of ideas.
3. Little or no attempt at connectivity, though reader can deduce some organization.
2. Individual ideas may be clear, but very difficult to deduce connection between them.
1. Lack of organization so serve that communication is seriously impaired.
SCORE: Gramm _______+ Voc_______+ Mech_______+ Form______
=_________
G. Materials:
1. Worksheet 1 (Attachment 1)
2. A set of picture series The Greedy Dog (Attachment 2)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
148
Teaching Materials:
Worksheet 1
NARRATIVE TEXT
Exercise 1 :Review on past tense
Exercise 2 : Identify the story below. Underlining the incorrect past tense!
Attachment: Picture series of The Greedy Dog
Exercise on past tense 1. Peter and John (go/ goes/ went) to the cinema last night.
2. I (am/ was/ is) sick yesterday so I stayed at home.
3. A woman (saw/ see/ seen) the accident two days ago.
4. My mother and I (cook/ cooked/ cooking) brownies cake yesterday.
5. I (was/ were/ am) at library yesterday when my friend called me.
6. My friends and I (watch/watched/ watching) “Amazing Spiderman” two days
ago in Solo Grand Mall.
7. My father (buyed/ bought/ buying) a new car last week.
8. I (am/was/ is) very happy in my birthday three days ago.
THE STORY OF CINDE LARAS
Long time ago in the island of Java, there is a kingdom of Kediri. The king
was Raden Putra. He is a rich and powerful king. He likes cock fighting. One of his
wives tell him that the queen had putted poison in his food. The king is very angry.
Without thinking deeply and without checking this information, he immediately
orders his soldiers took her to the wood. But when thet where there the soldiers take
a pity on her. They do not want to kill her because she is a kind and wise queen. At
that time, she is pregnant. So, they built house for her.
Several months later, the queen give birth baby boy. He smart and strong
boy. He likes cock fighting. One day, he join in the cock fighting tournament. In the
final tournament, he playing the cock fighting in the palace. Finally, he got first
winner. The king surprises to his ability. He asked CindeLaras about his home.
CindeLaras tells that he come from a wood. He is a son of king. But her mother was
alienated from the palace.Suddenly, the king regret his decision long time ago. Then
the king brought them back to the palace.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
149
Attachment: Picture Series of The Greedy Dog (Breikreuz, 1967, p.26)
LESSON PLAN
Cycle 2
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
150
School : SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta
Subject : English
Class/ Semester : VIII/ 2
Skill Focus : Writing
Time Allotment : 2 X 40 minutes
A. Competence Standard
12. To express the meaning of simple short functional written texts and
essay in the forms of recount and narrative to interact with surrounding
environment.
B. Basic Competence
12.2. To express the meaning and rhetoric steps in simple short essay in
written language accurately, fluently and acceptable to interact with
surrounding environment in the form of narrative.
C. Indicators
Cognitive
1. Students are able to identify the elements of narrative text
2. Students are able to identify the generic structure of a narrative text
3. Students are able to identify the language features in a narrative
text
4. Students are able to use past tense sentences in writing a narrative
text correctly
Affective
1. Students are able to arrange the narrative text in group activity
2. Students are able to respond and give opinion in arranging the
narrative text in group.
3. Sudents are able to participate actively and produce the narrative
text
Psychomotor
1. Students are able to produce good narrative text.
D. Classroom Activities
Time Teacher activities Students activities
Pre Learning Activities
2‟ Teacher asks a student to lead the prayer and greet The students pray
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
151
the students. together and respond
the teacher‟s
greeting.
Main Learning Activities
3‟ Teachers will distribute a set of picture series.
Students will work in pair.
Students work in pair
and do the
assignment.
30‟
The teacher distributes a set of jumbled picture
series of Cinderella Story to each pair. Then, the
students are asked to arrange the picture series into
the correct sequences. After that, the teacher
invites the students to identify the picture series.
The teacher asks the students to identify the
characters, the things, and the places of the picture
series
After that, the teacher distributes the jumbled
paragraphs to each pair. The jumbled paragraphs
are the story of the picture series before. Then, the
teacher askes the students to arrange the
paragraphs into a complete story.
The students work in
pairs.
The students arrange
the jumbled pictures
series
The students identify
the picture series
Then, they get the
jumbled paragraphs.
The students have to
arrange the
paragraphs into a
complete one and fill
the blanks.
5‟ Teacher distributes a set new picture series of the
story The Greedy Dog to the students. Each student
will get a set of picture series. Teacher explains the
picture series to the students.
The students get a set
of picture series.
Students pay
attention to the
explanation.
35‟ Teacher asks the students to write a narrative text
based on the new picture series individually.
The students write a
narrative text based
on the new picture
series individually.
Post Learning Activities
1‟ Teacher asks the students to submit their individual
draft.
Students submit their
individual draft.
2‟ Teacher reviews what they have learnt today by
asking questions orally
Students review what
they have learnt
today by answering
the questions orally.
1‟ Teacher end the lesson.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
152
E. Sources and Teaching Media
Teacher module which contains discussion, exercises and instruction for the
project
White board
Board marker
Picture series
F. Assessment
Form: draft of narrative text
Rubric of scoring:
This scoring scale is based on Anderson‟s scale which was written in
Hughes book (1989, p.91-93)
Grammar
6. Few (if any) noticeable errors of grammar or word order.
5. Some errors of grammar or word order which do not, however, interfere
with comprehension.
4. Errors of grammar or word order fairly frequent; occasional re-reading
necessary for full comprehension.
3. Errors of grammar or word order frequent; efforts of interpretation
sometimes required on reader‟s part.
2. Errors of grammar or word order very frequent; reader often has to rely on
own interpretation
1. Errors of grammar or word order so severe as to make comprehension
virtually impossible.
Vocabulary
6. Use of vocabulary and idiom rarely (if at all) distinguishable from that of
educated native writer
5. Occasionally uses inappropriate terms or relies on circumlocutions;
expressions of ideas hardly impaired
4. Uses wrong or inappropriate words fairly frequently; expressions of ideas
may be limited because of inadequate vocabulary.
3. Limited vocabulary and frequent errors clearly hinder expressions of ideas
2. Vocabulary so limited and so frequently misused that reader must often rely
own interpretation
1. Vocabulary limitations so extreme as to make comprehension virtually
impossible.
Mechanics
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
153
6. Few (if any) noticeable lapses in punctuation or spelling
5. Occasional lapses in punctuation or which do not, however, interfere with
comprehension.
4. Errors in punctuation or spelling order fairly frequent; occasional re-
reading necessary for full comprehension.
3. Frequent errors in spelling or punctuation; lead sometimes to obscurity.
2. Errors in punctuation or spelling order so frequent; reader often has to rely
on own interpretation
1. Errors in punctuation or spelling order so severe as to make comprehension
virtually impossible
Fluency (style and ease of communication)
6. Choice of structure and vocabulary consistently appropriate; like that of
educated native writer.
5. Occasional lack of consistency in choice of structure and vocabulary which
does not, however, impair overall ease of communication.
4. „Patchy‟, with some structures or vocabulary items noticeably inappropriate
to general style.
3. Structures or vocabulary items sometimes not only inappropriate but also
misused; little sense of ease if communication
2. Communication often impaired by completely inappropriate or misused
structures or vocabulary items
1. A „hotch- potch‟ of half-learned misused structures and vocabulary items
rendering communication almost impossible.
Form (organization)
6. Highly organized; clear progression of ideas well linked; like educated
native writer.
5. Material well organized, links could occasionally be clearer but
communication not impaired
4. Some lack of organization; re-reading required for clarification of ideas.
3. Little or no attempt at connectivity, though reader can deduce some
organization.
2. Individual ideas may be clear, but very difficult to deduce connection
between them.
1. Lack of organization so serve that communication is seriously impaired.
SCORE: Gramm _______+ Voc_______+ Mech_______+ Form______
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
154
=_________
G. Material
Attachments:
1. Picture series of Cinderella Story:
http://www.abcteach.com/free/c/cinderellasequencecards.pdf
2. Picture series of Rabbit and Tortoise (Breikreuz, 1967, p.32)
NARRATIVE TEXT Exercise 1
Work in pair! Arrange these jumbled picture series with your friend!
A
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
156
When Cinderella arrived to the palace, the prince chose her to be the most beautiful. Then,
the prince danced with Cinderella. When they enjoyed the party and danced together, the
clock began to strike at __________________. She ran toward the door as fast she could. In
her hurry, she felt the ____________________. Cinderella went back to home.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
157
Happily invitation Cinderella’s feet cooked
step mother cleaned step sisters Cinderella
was midnight happy twelve
slipper fairy godmother married
carriage pumpkin
The prince was so curious about Cinderella. He made a contest for who fit with the glass
slipper, she would be his wife. Fortunately, when the prince came to Cinderella’ house, he
put on the slipper to ______________________. And amazingly, the slipper was very fit to
be worn. Cinderella also showed the pair of the glass slipper. Then, finally the prince got
___________________ with Cinderella. They live _________________ ever after.
Once upon a time, there was a beautiful young lady named ________________. Her
mother was passed away so that his father married to her _________________. Then, she
also lived with the two ______________________. The step mother and the step sisters
were so arrogant and bad tempered, they treated Cinderella very badly. The step mother
made Cinderella do the house keeper’s job in the house. Cinderella _______________ the
floor and _____________ food for the step mother and the step sisters.
One day, there was an ________________ to the ball and who would be the most
beautiful would dance with the prince. They were excited about it and spent so much time
to choose the dresses and the beautiful shoes they would wear. Unfortunately, the two
step sisters did not allow Cinderella to attend the party. Then, Cinderella ______ very sad
because she couldn’t go to the party. Suddenly, she was shocked. She saw a
________________________ in front of her. The fairy godmother knew that Cinderella
was a good girl. She turned the __________________ into a beautiful ______________.
The fairy godmother also gave Cinderella a beautiful gown and a pair of glass slippers. She
was very ____________. The fairy godmother said that she only could dance until
______________.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
158
Attachment: Picture series of Rabbit and Tortoise (Breikreuz, 1967, p.32)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
159
APPENDIX E
Observation Sheet Result
1. Observation Sheet from the Researcher in the
Preliminary Study
2. Observation Sheet from Observer A in Cycle 1
Meeting 1
3. Observation Sheet from Observer B n Cycle 1
Meeting 1
4. Observation Sheet from Observer A in Cycle 1
Meeting 2
5. Observation Sheet from Observer B in Cycle 1
Meeting 2
6. Observation Sheet from Observer A in Cycle 2
7. Observation Sheet from Observer B n Cycle 2
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
160
1. Observation Sheet from the Researcher in the Preliminary Study
OBSERVATION SHEET ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE TEACHER
School : SMP NEGERI 10 SURAKARTA
Class : VIII F
Day : Thursday, April 15th
, 2014
Time : 10.50- 12.10
Please give check mark (v) on the right column based on teacher‟s activity during
the observation.
No Statements Yes No
1. The teacher checks the students‟ readiness to follow the
lesson.
2. The teacher gives clear instruction to the students.
3. The teacher uses English most of the time.
4. The teacher delivers the materials in accordance with the
lesson plan.
5. The teacher manages the time well.
6. The teacher masters the material well.
7. The teacher explains the material clearly.
8. The teacher uses any media.
9. The teacher guides the students in writing recount text
using the media.
10. The teacher responds students‟ questions well.
11. The teacher gives positive reinforcement.
12. The teacher is able to manage the class.
13. The teacher uses clear voice.
14. The teacher is enthusiastic in teaching the lesson.
15. The teacher gets the students involve in teaching- learning
process
16. The teacher makes reflection in the end of the lesson.
Observer,
Floriberta Ratih Dewanti N.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
161
OBSERVATION SHEET ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE STUDENTS
School : SMP NEGERI 10 SURAKARTA
Class : VIII F
Day : Thursday, April 15th
, 2014
Time : 10.50- 12.10
Please give check mark (v) on the right column based on students‟ activity during
the observation.
No Statements Yes No
1. The students are ready to follow the lesson.
2. The students understand the instruction given by the teacher.
3. The students use English most of the time to communicate with
their fellows or teacher.
4. The students could perceive teacher‟s explanation well.
5. The students do the task given by the teacher seriously.
6. The students actively involve during the lesson.
7. The students actively involve during the group discussion.
8. The students understand the media used in the classroom.
9. The students are enthusiastic with the use of picture series as
the media.
10. The students are motivated to use dictionary to find the
difficult word.
11. The students make notes during the lesson.
12. The students feel happy during the lesson.
13. The students feel bored during the lesson.
14. The students get difficulty in looking at the picture series.
15. The students get confused when do the task given by the
teacher.
16. The students look enjoy when writing the text.
Observer
Floriberta Ratih Dewanti
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
162
2. Observation Sheet from Observer A in Cycle 1 (Meeting 1)
OBSERVATION SHEET ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE TEACHER
School : SMP NEGERI 10 SURAKARTA
Class : VIII F
Day : Thursday, April 24, 2014
Time : 10.50- 12.10
Please give check mark (v) on the right column based on teacher‟s activity during
the observation.
No Statements Yes No
1. The teacher checks the students‟ readiness to follow the
lesson.
2. The teacher gives clear instruction to the students.
3. The teacher uses English most of the time.
4. The teacher delivers the materials in accordance with the
lesson plan.
5. The teacher manages the time well.
6. The teacher masters the material well.
7. The teacher explains the material clearly.
8. The teacher uses any media.
9. The teacher guides the students in writing narrative text
using picture series.
10. The teacher responds students‟ questions well.
11. The teacher gives positive reinforcement.
12. The teacher is able to manage the class.
13. The teacher uses clear voice.
14. The teacher is enthusiastic in teaching the lesson.
15. The teacher gets the students involve in teaching- learning
process
16. The teacher makes reflection in the end of the lesson.
Observer,
Saptowati, S. Pd.
NIP. 199630715198720005
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
163
OBSERVATION SHEET ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE STUDENTS
School : SMP NEGERI 10 SURAKARTA
Class : VIII F
Day : Thursday, April 24, 2014
Time : 10.50- 12.10
Please give check mark (v) on the right column based on students‟ activity during
the observation.
No Statements Yes No
1. The students are ready to follow the lesson.
2. The students understand the instruction given by the teacher.
3. The students use English most of the time to communicate with
their fellows or teacher.
4. The students could perceive teacher‟s explanation well.
5. The students do the task given by the teacher seriously.
6. The students actively involve during the lesson.
7. The students actively involve during the group discussion.
8. The students understand the media used in the classroom.
9. The students are enthusiastic with the use of picture series as
the media.
10. The students are motivated to use dictionary to find the
difficult word.
11. The students make notes during the lesson.
12. The students feel happy during the lesson.
13. The students feel bored during the lesson.
14. The students get difficulty in looking at the picture series.
15. The students get confused when do the task given by the
teacher.
16. The students look enjoy when writing the text.
Observer
Saptowati, S. Pd.
NIP. 199630715198720005
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
164
3. Observation Sheet from Observer B in Cycle 1 (Meeting 1)
OBSERVATION SHEET ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE TEACHER
School : SMP NEGERI 10 SURAKARTA
Class : VIII F
Day : Thursday, April 24, 2014
Time : 10.50- 12.10
Please give check mark (v) on the right column based on teacher‟s activity during
the observation.
No Statements Yes No
1. The teacher checks the students‟ readiness to follow the
lesson.
2. The teacher gives clear instruction to the students.
3. The teacher uses English most of the time.
4. The teacher delivers the materials in accordance with the
lesson plan.
5. The teacher manages the time well.
6. The teacher masters the material well.
7. The teacher explains the material clearly.
8. The teacher uses any media.
9. The teacher guides the students in writing narrative text
using picture series.
10. The teacher responds students‟ questions well.
11. The teacher gives positive reinforcement.
12. The teacher is able to manage the class.
13. The teacher uses clear voice.
14. The teacher is enthusiastic in teaching the lesson.
15. The teacher gets the students involve in teaching- learning
process
16. The teacher makes reflection in the end of the lesson.
Observer,
Fransiska Natalia Susi
A student of ELESP of Sanata Dharma University
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
165
OBSERVATION SHEET ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE STUDENTS
School : SMP NEGERI 10 SURAKARTA
Class : VIII F
Day : Thursday, April 24, 2014
Time : 10.50- 12.10
Please give check mark (v) on the right column based on students‟ activity during
the observation.
No Statements Yes No
1. The students are ready to follow the lesson.
2. The students understand the instruction given by the teacher.
3. The students use English most of the time to communicate with
their fellows or teacher.
4. The students could perceive teacher‟s explanation well.
5. The students do the task given by the teacher seriously.
6. The students actively involve during the lesson.
7. The students actively involve during the group discussion.
8. The students understand the media used in the classroom.
9. The students are enthusiastic with the use of picture series as
the media.
10. The students are motivated to use dictionary to find the
difficult word.
11. The students make notes during the lesson.
12. The students feel happy during the lesson.
13. The students feel bored during the lesson.
14. The students get difficulty in looking at the picture series.
15. The students get confused when do the task given by the
teacher.
16. The students look enjoy when writing the text.
Observer
Fransiska Natalia Susi
A student of ELESP of Sanata Dharma University
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
166
4. Observation Sheet from Observer A in Cycle 1 (Meeting 2)
OBSERVATION SHEET ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE TEACHER
School : SMP NEGERI 10 SURAKARTA
Class : VIII F
Day : Tuesday, April 29, 2014
Time : 08.20- 09.55
Please give check mark (v) on the right column based on teacher‟s activity during
the observation.
No Statements Yes No
1. The teacher checks the students‟ readiness to follow the
lesson.
2. The teacher gives clear instruction to the students.
3. The teacher uses English most of the time.
4. The teacher delivers the materials in accordance with the
lesson plan.
5. The teacher manages the time well.
6. The teacher masters the material well.
7. The teacher explains the material clearly.
8. The teacher uses any media.
9. The teacher guides the students in writing narrative text
using picture series.
10. The teacher responds students‟ questions well.
11. The teacher gives positive reinforcement.
12. The teacher is able to manage the class.
13. The teacher uses clear voice.
14. The teacher is enthusiastic in teaching the lesson.
15. The teacher gets the students involve in teaching- learning
process
16. The teacher makes reflection in the end of the lesson.
Observer,
Saptowati, S. Pd.
NIP. 199630715198720005
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
167
OBSERVATION SHEET ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE STUDENTS
School : SMP NEGERI 10 SURAKARTA
Class : VIII F
Day : Tuesday, April 29, 2014
Time : 08.20- 09.55
Please give check mark (v) on the right column based on students‟ activity during
the observation.
No Statements Yes No
1. The students are ready to follow the lesson.
2. The students understand the instruction given by the teacher.
3. The students use English most of the time to communicate with
their fellows or teacher.
4. The students could perceive teacher‟s explanation well.
5. The students do the task given by the teacher seriously.
6. The students actively involve during the lesson.
7. The students actively involve during the group discussion.
8. The students understand the media used in the classroom.
9. The students are enthusiastic with the use of picture series as
the media.
10. The students are motivated to use dictionary to find the
difficult word.
11. The students make notes during the lesson.
12. The students feel happy during the lesson.
13. The students feel bored during the lesson.
14. The students get difficulty in looking at the picture series.
15. The students get confused when do the task given by the
teacher.
16. The students look enjoy when writing the text.
Observer
Saptowati, S. Pd.
NIP. 199630715198720005
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
168
5. Observation Sheet from Observer B in Cycle 1 Meeting 2
OBSERVATION SHEET ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE TEACHER
School : SMP NEGERI 10 SURAKARTA
Class : VIII F
Day : Tuesday, April 29, 2014
Time : 08.20- 09.55
Please give check mark (v) on the right column based on teacher‟s activity during
the observation.
No Statements Yes No
1. The teacher checks the students‟ readiness to follow the
lesson.
2. The teacher gives clear instruction to the students.
3. The teacher uses English most of the time.
4. The teacher delivers the materials in accordance with the
lesson plan.
5. The teacher manages the time well.
6. The teacher masters the material well.
7. The teacher explains the material clearly.
8. The teacher uses any media.
9. The teacher guides the students in writing narrative text
using picture series.
10. The teacher responds students‟ questions well.
11. The teacher gives positive reinforcement.
12. The teacher is able to manage the class.
13. The teacher uses clear voice.
14. The teacher is enthusiastic in teaching the lesson.
15. The teacher gets the students involve in teaching- learning
process
16. The teacher makes reflection in the end of the lesson.
Observer,
Fransiska Natalia Susi
A student of ELESP of Sanata Dharma University
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
169
OBSERVATION SHEET ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE STUDENTS
School : SMP NEGERI 10 SURAKARTA
Class : VIII F
Day : Tuesday, April 29, 2014
Time : 08.20- 09.55
Please give check mark (v) on the right column based on students‟ activity during
the observation.
No Statements Yes No
1. The students are ready to follow the lesson.
2. The students understand the instruction given by the teacher.
3. The students use English most of the time to communicate with
their fellows or teacher.
4. The students could perceive teacher‟s explanation well.
5. The students do the task given by the teacher seriously.
6. The students actively involve during the lesson.
7. The students actively involve during the group discussion.
8. The students understand the media used in the classroom.
9. The students are enthusiastic with the use of picture series as
the media.
10. The students are motivated to use dictionary to find the
difficult word.
11. The students make notes during the lesson.
12. The students feel happy during the lesson.
13. The students feel bored during the lesson.
14. The students get difficulty in looking at the picture series.
15. The students get confused when do the task given by the
teacher.
16. The students look enjoy when writing the text.
Observer
Fransiska Natalia Susi
A student of ELESP of Sanata Dharma University
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
170
6. Observation Sheet from Observer A in Cycle 2
OBSERVATION SHEET ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE TEACHER
School : SMP NEGERI 10 SURAKARTA
Class : VIII F
Day : Tuesday, May 13, 2014
Time : 08.20- 09.55
Please give check mark (v) on the right column based on teacher‟s activity during
the observation.
No Statements Yes No
1. The teacher checks the students‟ readiness to follow the
lesson.
2. The teacher gives clear instruction to the students.
3. The teacher uses English most of the time.
4. The teacher delivers the materials in accordance with the
lesson plan.
5. The teacher manages the time well.
6. The teacher masters the material well.
7. The teacher explains the material clearly.
8. The teacher uses any media.
9. The teacher guides the students in writing narrative text
using picture series.
10. The teacher responds students‟ questions well.
11. The teacher gives positive reinforcement.
12. The teacher is able to manage the class.
13. The teacher uses clear voice.
14. The teacher is enthusiastic in teaching the lesson.
15. The teacher gets the students involve in teaching- learning
process
16. The teacher makes reflection in the end of the lesson.
Observer,
Saptowati, S. Pd.
NIP. 199630715198720005
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
171
OBSERVATION SHEET ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE STUDENTS
School : SMP NEGERI 10 SURAKARTA
Class : VIII F
Day : Tuesday, May 13, 2014
Time : 08.20- 09.55
Please give check mark (v) on the right column based on students‟ activity during
the observation.
No Statements Yes No
1. The students are ready to follow the lesson.
2. The students understand the instruction given by the teacher.
3. The students use English most of the time to communicate with
their fellows or teacher.
4. The students could perceive teacher‟s explanation well.
5. The students do the task given by the teacher seriously.
6. The students actively involve during the lesson.
7. The students actively involve during the group discussion.
8. The students understand the media used in the classroom.
9. The students are enthusiastic with the use of picture series as
the media.
10. The students are motivated to use dictionary to find the
difficult word.
11. The students make notes during the lesson.
12. The students feel happy during the lesson.
13. The students feel bored during the lesson.
14. The students get difficulty in looking at the picture series.
15. The students get confused when do the task given by the
teacher.
16. The students look enjoy when writing the text.
Observer
Saptowati, S.
Pd.
NIP. 199630715198720005
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
172
7. Observation Sheet from Observer B in Cycle 2
OBSERVATION SHEET ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE TEACHER
School : SMP NEGERI 10 SURAKARTA
Class : VIII F
Day : Tuesday, May 13, 2014
Time : 08.20- 09.55
Please give check mark (v) on the right column based on teacher‟s activity during
the observation.
No Statements Yes No
1. The teacher checks the students‟ readiness to follow the
lesson.
2. The teacher gives clear instruction to the students.
3. The teacher uses English most of the time.
4. The teacher delivers the materials in accordance with the
lesson plan.
5. The teacher manages the time well.
6. The teacher masters the material well.
7. The teacher explains the material clearly.
8. The teacher uses any media.
9. The teacher guides the students in writing narrative text
using picture series.
10. The teacher responds students‟ questions well.
11. The teacher gives positive reinforcement.
12. The teacher is able to manage the class.
13. The teacher uses clear voice.
14. The teacher is enthusiastic in teaching the lesson.
15. The teacher gets the students involve in teaching- learning
process
16. The teacher makes reflection in the end of the lesson.
Observer,
Fransiska Natalia Susi
A student of ELESP of Sanata Dharma University
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
173
OBSERVATION SHEET ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE STUDENTS
School : SMP NEGERI 10 SURAKARTA
Class : VIII F
Day : Tuesday, May 13, 2014
Time : 08.20- 09.55
Please give check mark (v) on the right column based on students‟ activity during
the observation
.
No Statements Yes No
1. The students are ready to follow the lesson.
2. The students understand the instruction given by the teacher.
3. The students use English most of the time to communicate with
their fellows or teacher.
4. The students could perceive teacher‟s explanation well.
5. The students do the task given by the teacher seriously.
6. The students actively involve during the lesson.
7. The students actively involve during the group discussion.
8. The students understand the media used in the classroom.
9. The students are enthusiastic with the use of picture series as
the media.
10. The students are motivated to use dictionary to find the
difficult word.
11. The students make notes during the lesson.
12. The students feel happy during the lesson.
13. The students feel bored during the lesson.
14. The students get difficulty in looking at the picture series.
15. The students get confused when do the task given by the
teacher.
16. The students look enjoy when writing the text.
Observer
Fransiska Natalia Susi
A student of ELESP of Sanata Dharma University
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
174
APPENDIX F
Field Notes Result
1. Field Notes Cycle 1 Meeting 1
2. Field Notes Cycle 1 Meeting2
3. Field Notes Cycle 2
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
175
1. Field Notes of Cycle 1 Meeting 1
FIELD NOTES 1
The first meeting was conducted on Thursday, April 24th
, 2014. The
research was conducted in class VIII F in SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta. There were
24 students in the class. Two students were absent. The time allocation was 80
minutes (10.50- 12.10). For the first time, the researcher introduced herself to the
students since in the preliminary study she had not introduced herself. Also, the
researcher introduced the observer. The researcher also explained the purpose of
teaching in order to conduct research for thesis. This teaching process was aimed
to collect the data for her undergraduate thesis. In the beginning, the students
looked tired because it was the last subject for that day. The researcher then
greeted all the students and checked the attendance list. There were two students
absent; Ardhaninggar and MashabihulHudha.
In the class, the observer observed that there was no LCD used in the
class. The only media that available to be used in the class was whiteboard.
Therefore, the researcher distributed the handouts of narrative text to the
students. Then, after distributing the handout, the researcher asked questions to
the students about the example of narrative text which they had known. There
were several students who mentioned “legendatangkubanperahu”,
“legendarorojonggrang”, “malinkundang”,”cinderella”, “putritidur”, and so
on. They looked more enthusiastic than previous. After that, the researcher tried
to dig out the students‟ understanding about what narrative text was. They
answered in Bahasa Indonesia. The teacher asked them to speak in English. The
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
176
researcher responded some answersfrom the students. As the conclusion, the
researcher read the handout together with the students. From the handout, there
were explanations about the definition of narrative text, the communicative
purpose, types of narrative text, generic structure (organization), language
features, and example of narrative text. While teaching about language features,
the researcher reviewed about past tense briefly since the students had gotten it in
the previous meeting with their English teacher. There was an example of
narrative text in the handout entitled “The Ugly Duckling”. Here, the researcher
invited the students to analyze the generic structure and also found the past tense
particularly the use of Verb 2 in the text.
In the middle explanation, some of students talked about something else
that was not related to the materials. The researcher tried to get students‟
attention by counting loudly one until five, doing eye contact with the whole
class. She also said, “Can I have your attention please” when she needed the
students‟ attention. The researcher explained the material using English and
Bahasa Indonesia.
After finishing the explanations, the teacher asked the students to work in
group. Each group consists of 4 until 5 students. The researcher invited the
students to play a game, namely Story Chain. In the game, the students had to
make a sentence alternately. The sentence had to be connected to the previous
sentences. The students look very enthusiastic. They were engaged in the game.
They experienced to write narrative text for the first time. After gaming, the
researcher asked them to compose a narrative text of “Three Little Pig” based on
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
177
the picture series which presented on the whiteboard. The students looked very
enthusiastic to the picture series. By using picture series, the lesson was more
interesting. They tried to find the new vocabularies which they saw in the picture
series. They also became more active in the group. However, the problems here
were since the pictureseries was attached on the whiteboard, some students came
forward to see the picture series. They were busy huddling together in front of
the class and it wasted the time to do their work. Also, there were some groups
who still had difficulty in composing the text. Few students in the groups did
their writings then the rest just saw the picture series in front of the class then
informed to these students. Also, there were students who talked about another
topic which did not related to the lesson and the students who they considered as
the smart students did the drafts alone. But the researcher tried to always control
them. The researcher visited the group and tried to guide those groups.
After finishing the activities, the researcher asked the students to submit
their group draft. The researcher gave them feedback and the students had to
revise it and that submit to the teacher.
As the closing activity, the researcher reviewed the material that they had
learnt. She also asked the students to bring their dictionaries for the next meeting.
Then, the researcher ended the lesson.
The observer
Fransiska Natalia Susi W.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
178
2. Field Notes of Cycle 1 Meeting 2
FIELD NOTES 2
The second field note was conducted in the second meeting of the first
cycle on April, 29th
, 2014. The lesson was begun by greeting the students and
checking the students‟ attendance list. They also greet the researcher
enthusiastically. After greeting, the researcher began the learning process.
In the beginning, the researcher informed that they got better scores in
their group drafts in the previous meeting rather than comparing to the
preliminary study. But, still, they made some mistakes in composing the story.
The researcher said that the students often made grammatical mistakes in
applying the simple past tense particularly in the use of verb 2 and be form.
Therefore, the researcher informed to the students that in this meeting, the first
activity was reviewing the part in which the students had the mistakes.
The activity was begun by researcher‟s review on the use of simple past tense.
The researcher distributed exercise of simple past tense to the students. The
students were asked to change the verb into verb 2 and the be form. They looked
serious enough while did the exercise. After finished the exercise, the researcher
and the students discussed the answer together. The researcher also invited the
students‟ attention about their opinion of each question. There were several
students were more confident to express their opinion of the answer of the
questions.
The second activity was identifying the new narrative text given by the
researcher. The researcher gave the new story, The Story of Cinde Laras. The
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
179
students were asked to identify the grammatical errors of simple past tense in the
story. The students worked in the same group as the previous meeting. In this
occasion, theresearcher did not use the picture series in the group since they
focused only on reviewing the use of simple past tense. The students looked
more serious while working in the group rather than in the previous meeting.
After finished in the group task, the researcher and the students discussed the
answers together. The researcher asked students‟ opinions about the answers.
In the individual activity, the researcher put a set of picture series attach on the
whiteboard. The story was The Greedy Dog. The students did their writing. The
students were still enthusiastic with the picture series used in the learning
process. But, because of the picture series was attached on the whiteboard, some
of the students came in front to see the details of the picture series. They wasted
their time to look the picture series rather than did their work. The observer
suggestion was the researcher had to modify the way she delivered the picture
series to the students.
After finished the task, the researcher asked the students to submit their writing
and ended the learning process.
The observer,
Fransiska Natalia Susi W.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
180
3. Field Notes of Cycle 2
FIELD NOTES OF CYCLE TWO
The third field notes was made in the cycle two which was conducted on
Tuesday, May 13th
, 2014. The lesson was begun by greeting the students and
checking the students‟ attendance list. They also greet the researcher
enthusiastically. After greeting, the researcher began the learning process.
The researcher started the lesson by informing what they were going to
learn and what activities they were going to have. Then, the researcher asked the
students to work in pairs. Each pair was given a set of jumbled picture series of a
narrative text Cinderella Story. The researcher asked the students to arrange the
picture series and identify it. The students were asked to identify the characters of
the story, the setting of the story (place and time), and also the plot of the story.
The students looked very enthusiastic in arranging the picture series.
After that, the researcher distributed the jumbled paragraphs of the story.
The students got the paragraphs and they had to arrange those paragraphs
according to the picture series given. This group activity worked well rather than
in the first and second meeting. Those jumbled paragraphs actually had several
blanks. The students‟ task was filling the blanks in those paragraphs. The
researcher had already given the vocabulary in the handouts. They only had to
choose the appropriate vocabulary. The observer looked that this activity was very
good. The students focused on the tasks given by the researcher. Also, working in
pairs made the class more conducive.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
181
In the individual writing, the researcher asked the students to work
individually. A set of picture series was given one by one. The story was The
Rabbit and the Tortoise. It was really good. The students focused on their work.
They did notneed to see the details of the picture series on the whiteboard likewise
the previous meeting.
In the post activity, the researcher ended the lesson and thanked to the
participants of this research: the English teacher of the class, the students class
VIII F of SMP Negeri 10 Surakarta, and also the observer.
The observer,
Fransiska Natalia Susi W.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
182
APPENDIX G
Questionnaire Results
1. Questionnaire Result of the Preliminary Study
2. Questionnaire Result Cycle 1
3. Questionnaire Result Cycle 2
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
183
Questionnaire Result of the Preliminary Study
No Statements
Strongly
Disagree
(1)
Disagree
(2)
Agree
(3)
Strongly
Agree
(4)
N
1. Anda menyukai pelajaran
Bahasa Inggris. -
6
(23.01%)
20
(76.92%) - 26
2.
Anda menyukai saat guru
mengajarkan materi
menulis (writing) dalam
Bahasa Inggris.
- 12
(46.15%)
14
(53.85%) - 26
3.
Anda menemui kesulitan
atau kendala saat akan
menulis (writing) dalam
Bahasa Inggris
- 1
(3.85%)
4
(15.83%)
21
(80.77%) 26
4.
Anda mudah dalam
menemukan ide/ gagasan
dalam menulis (writing)
dalam Bahasa Inggris.
- 21
(80.77%)
5
(19.23%) - 26
5.
Anda mudah dalam
menemukan kata-kata
dalam bahasa Inggris saat
menulis (writing) dalam
Bahasa Inggris.
- 19
(73.08%)
7
(26.92%) - 26
6.
Media yang digunakan
guru pada saat
mengajarkan materi
menulis (writing)
menarik.
- 17
65.38%)
9
(34.61%) - 26
7.
Media yang digunakan
guru pada saat
mengajarkan materi
menulis (writing)mudah
dipahami.
- 4
(15.38%)
22
(84.61%) - 26
8.
Media yang digunakan
guru pada saat
mengajarkan materi
menulis (writing)
membantu anda dalam
meningkatkan
- 12
(46.15%)
14
(53.85%) - 26
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
184
kemampuan menulis
(writing) anda
9.
Kondisi dan situasi kelas
menyenangkan saat guru
menyampaikan materi
menulis (writing).
- 1
(3.85%)
25
(96.15%)
-
26
10.
Anda merasa sudah puas
dengan hasil tulisan anda
(tugas-tugas) yang
diberikan guru pada
materi menulis (writing).
- 22
(84.61%)
4
(15.38%) - 26
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
185
Questionnaire Result of Cycle 1
No Statements
Frequency of Points of
Agreement
Central
Tendency
1 2 3 4 N MN
Learning activity
1
Worksheet yang diberikan oleh
guru sangat membantu saya dala
memahami karangan berbahasa
Inggris narrative.
0 5 17 4 26 2.96
2
Bekerja dalam kelompok
membantu saya untuk menulis
karangan berbahasa Inggris
narrative sebelum menulis secara
individual.
0 7 14 5 26 2.92
3
Bermain game untuk pre- writing
membantu saya untuk mulai
menyusun karangan berbahasa
Inggris narrative.
0 5 14 7 26 3.08
4
Penggunaan gambar berseri dapat
digunakan sebagai media yang
tepat dalam menulis karangan
berbahasa Ingris narrative.
0 2 8 16 26 3.54
5 Gambar seri yang diberikan oleh
guru sudah cukup jelas. 0 7 7 12 26 3.19
Total mean score 15.6
9
Learning products
6
Saya dapat menangkap dengan jelas
maksud dari gambar berseri yang
disajikan yang diberikan oleh guru.
0 4 12 10 26 3.23
7
Penggunaan gambar berseri
membuat saya dapat menemukan
dan mengembangkan ide dalam
menulis karangan berbahasa Inggris
berbentuk narrative
0 7 10 9 26 3.08
8
Penggunaan gambar berseri
membuat saya mudah menemukan
kosa kata baru dalam bahasa
Inggris
0 4 12 10 26 3.23
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
186
9
Penggunaan gambar berseri
membuat saya mampu menyusun
cerita sesuai dengan generic
structure narrative yang runtut dan
benar
0 5 8 13 26 3.31
10
Penggunaan gambar berseri
membuat saya memahami konsep
tenses dan menggunakannya dalam
penulisan karanagan berbahasa
Inggris bentuk narrative
0 6 11 9 26 3.12
11
Penggunaan gambar berseri yang
digunakan membuat saya lebih
berpikir kreatif dalam menyusun
karangan berbahasa Inggris
narrative text
0 3 11 12 26 3.35
Total mean score 19.31
Student’s perception
12
Penggunaan gambar berseri dalam
menulis karangan berbahasa Inggris
bentuk narrative memotivasi saya
untuk menulis.
1 4 17 4 26 2.92
13
Penggunaan gambar berseri
membuat saya tidak merasa bosan
dalam mengikuti aktifitas di kelas.
2 1 18 15 26 4.54
14
Penggunaan gambar berseri
membuat saya lebih percaya diri
dalam menulis karangan bentuk
narrative.
1 3 14 8 26 3.12
15
Penggunaan gambar berseri
membuat saya lebih bersemangat
dan antusias dalam menulis
karangan berbahasa Inggris
narrative
2 3 13 8 26 3.04
Total mean score 13.62
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
187
The Percentage of the Questionnaire Result Cycle 1
N
o Pernyataan
Frequency of Points of Agreement N
1 2 3 4
Learning activity
1
Worksheet yang diberikan oleh
guru sangat membantu saya
dala memahami karangan
berbahasa Inggris narrative.
-
5
(19.23
%)
17
(65.38%)
4
(15.38%) 26
2
Bekerja dalam kelompok
membantu saya untuk menulis
karangan berbahasa Inggris
narrative sebelum menulis
secara individual.
-
7
(26.92
%)
14
(53.85%)
5
(19.23%) 26
3
Bermain game untuk pre-
writing membantu saya untuk
mulai menyusun karangan
berbahasa Inggris narrative.
-
5
(19.23
%)
14
(53.85%)
7
(26.92%) 26
4
Penggunaan gambar berseri
dapat digunakan sebagai media
yang tepat dalam menulis
karangan berbahasa Ingris
narrative.
-
2
(7.69
%)
8
(30.77%)
16
(61.54%) 26
5 Gambar seri yang diberikan
oleh guru sudah cukup jelas. -
7
(26.92
%)
7
(26.92%)
12
(46.15%) 26
Learning products
6
Saya dapat menangkap dengan
jelas maksud dari gambar
berseri yang disajikan yang
diberikan oleh guru.
-
4
(15.38
%)
12
(46.15%)
10
(38.46%) 26
7
Penggunaan gambar berseri
membuat saya dapat
menemukan dan
mengembangkan ide dalam
menulis karangan berbahasa
Inggris berbentuk narrative
-
7
(26.92
%)
10
(38.46%)
9
(34.62%) 26
8
Penggunaan gambar berseri
membuat saya mudah
menemukan kosa kata baru
dalam bahasa Inggris
-
4
(15.38
%)
12
(46.15%)
10
(38.46%) 26
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
188
9
Penggunaan gambar berseri
membuat saya mampu
menyusun cerita sesuai dengan
generic structure narrative
yang runtut dan benar
-
5
(19.23
%)
8
(30.77%)
13
(50%) 26
10
Penggunaan gambar berseri
membuat saya memahami
konsep tenses dan
menggunakannya dalam
penulisan karanagan berbahasa
Inggris bentuk narrative
-
6
(23.08
%)
11
(42.31%)
9
(34.62%) 26
11
Penggunaan gambar berseri
yang digunakan membuat saya
lebih berpikir kreatif dalam
menyusun karangan berbahasa
Inggris narrative text
-
3
(11.54
%)
11
(42.31%)
12
(46.15%) 26
Student’s perception
12
Penggunaan gambar berseri
dalam menulis karangan
berbahasa Inggris bentuk
narrative memotivasi saya
untuk menulis.
1
(3.85
%)
4
(15.38
%)
17
(65.38%)
4
(15.38%) 26
13
Penggunaan gambar berseri
membuat saya tidak merasa
bosan dalam mengikuti
aktifitas di kelas.
2
(7.69
%)
1
(3.85%
)
18
(69.23%) 15 26
14
Penggunaan gambar berseri
membuat saya lebih percaya
diri dalam menulis karangan
bentuk narrative.
1
(3.85
%)
3
(11.54
%)
14
(53.85%)
8
(30.77%) 26
15
Penggunaan gambar berseri
membuat saya lebih
bersemangat dan antusias
dalam menulis karangan
berbahasa Inggris narrative
2
(7.69
%)
3
(11.54
%)
13
(50%)
8
(30.77%) 26
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
189
Questionnaire Result of Cycle 2
N
o Pernyataan
Frequency of Points of
Agreement
Central
Tendency
1 2 3 4 N MN
Learning activity
1
Worksheet yang diberikan oleh
guru membantu saya untuk
mengulang materi yang sudah
diberikan sebelumnya.
0 0 7 19 26 3.73
2
Bekerja dalam kelompok melalui
jumbled picture series membantu
saya menemukan urutan cerita
yang runtut dan benar
0 2 11 13 26 3.42
3
Bekerja dalam kelompok
membantu saya memperdalam
materi past tense terutama
penggunaan to be dan verb 2
dalam menyusun karangan
berbahasa Inggris narrative.
0 0 17 9 26 3.35
4
Penggunaan gambar berseri yang
dibagikan masing-masing lebih
membantu saya dalam menulis
karangan berbahasa Inggris
narrative text daripada yang
ditempel di papan tulis.
0 0 12 14 26 3.54
5 Gambar berseri yang diberikan
oleh guru sudah cukup jelas. 0 0 19 7 26 3.27
Total mean score 17.31
Learning products
6
Saya dapat menangkap dengan
jelas maksud dari gambar berseri
yang disajikan yang diberikan oleh
guru.
0 0 18 8 26 3.31
7
Saya dapat lebih mudah
menemukan dan mengembangkan
ide dalam menulis karangan
berbahasa Inggris bentuk narrative
menggunakan gambar berseri yang
ada diberikan langsung (tidak
ditempel di papan tulis)
0 3 13 10 26 5.58
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
190
8
Saya dapat dengan mudah
membuat cerita sesuai dengan
generic structure narrative yang
runtut dan benar menggunakan
gambar berseri yang ada diberikan
langsung (tidak ditempel di papan
tulis)
0 4 13 9 26 3.19
9
Saya lebih memahami konsep
tenses yang digunakan dalam
penulisan karangan berbahasa
Inggris bentuk narrative dengan
menggunakan gambar berseri yang
ada diberikan langsung (tidak
ditempel di papan tulis)
0 6 9 11 26 3.19
10
Saya dapat menemukan kosa kata
baru dalam bahasa Inggris dengan
menggunakan gambar berseri yang
ada diberikan langsung (tidak
ditempel di papan tulis)
0 3 12 11 26 3.31
11
Saya dapat berpikir lebih kreatif
dalam menyusun teks berbahasa
Inggris narrativedengan media
gambar berseri yang ada diberikan
langsung (tidak ditempel di papan
tulis)
0 6 12 8 26 3.08
Total mean score 21.65
Student’s perception
12
Penggunaan gambar berseri dalam
menulis karangan berbahasa
Inggris bentuk narrative
memotivasi saya untuk menulis.
0 1 13 12 26 3.42
13 Penggunaan gambar berseri
membuat saya tidak merasa bosan
dalam mengikuti aktifitas di kelas.
0 2 13 11 26 3.35
14
Penggunaan gambar berseri
membuat saya lebih percaya diri
dalam menulis karangan bentuk
narrative.
0 3 11 12 26 3.35
15
Penggunaan gambar berseri
membuat saya lebih bersemangat
dan antusias dalam menulis
karangan berbahasa Inggris
narrative
0 3 13 10 26 3.27
Total mean score 13.38
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
191
The Percentage of Questionnaire Result Cycle 2
No Pernyataan Frequency of Points of
Agreement N
1 2 3 4
Learning activity
1
Worksheet yang diberikan oleh
guru membantu saya untuk
mengulang materi yang sudah
diberikan sebelumnya.
- -
7
(26.93%
)
19
(73/08%
)
26
2
Bekerja dalam kelompok melalui
jumbled picture series membantu
saya menemukan urutan cerita
yang runtut dan benar
-
2
(7.69
%)
11
(42.31%
)
13
(50%) 26
3
Bekerja dalam kelompok
membantu saya memperdalam
materi past tense terutama
penggunaan to be dan verb 2
dalam menyusun karangan
berbahasa Inggris narrative.
- -
17
(65.38%
)
9
(34.62%
)
26
4
Penggunaan gambar berseri yang
dibagikan masing-masing lebih
membantu saya dalam menulis
karangan berbahasa Inggris
narrative text daripada yang
ditempel di papan tulis.
- -
12
(46.15%
)
14
(53.85%
)
26
5 Gambar berseri yang diberikan
oleh guru sudah cukup jelas.
- -
19
(73.08%
)
7
(26.92%
)
26
Learning products
6
Saya dapat menangkap dengan
jelas maksud dari gambar berseri
yang disajikan yang diberikan oleh
guru.
- -
18
(69.23
%)
8
(30.77%) 26
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
192
7
Saya dapat lebih mudah
menemukan dan mengembangkan
ide dalam menulis karangan
berbahasa Inggris bentuk narrative
menggunakan gambar berseri yang
ada diberikan langsung (tidak
ditempel di papan tulis)
-
3
(11.5
4%)
13
(50%)
10
(38.46%) 26
8
Saya dapat dengan mudah
membuat cerita sesuai dengan
generic structure narrative yang
runtut dan benar menggunakan
gambar berseri yang ada diberikan
langsung (tidak ditempel di papan
tulis)
-
4
(15.3
8%)
13
(50%)
9
(34.62%) 26
9
Saya lebih memahami konsep
tenses yang digunakan dalam
penulisan karangan berbahasa
Inggris bentuk narrative dengan
menggunakan gambar berseri yang
ada diberikan langsung (tidak
ditempel di papan tulis)
-
6
(23.0
8%)
9
(34.62
%)
11
(42.31%) 26
10
Saya dapat menemukan kosa kata
baru dalam bahasa Inggris dengan
menggunakan gambar berseri yang
ada diberikan langsung (tidak
ditempel di papan tulis)
-
3
(11.5
4%)
12
(46.15
%)
11
(42.31%) 26
11
Saya dapat berpikir lebih kreatif
dalam menyusun teks berbahasa
Inggris narrativedengan media
gambar berseri yang ada diberikan
langsung (tidak ditempel di papan
tulis)
-
6
(23.0
8%)
12
(46.15
%)
8
(30.77%) 26
Student’s perception
12
Penggunaan gambar berseri dalam
menulis karangan berbahasa
Inggris bentuk narrative
memotivasi saya untuk menulis.
-
1
(3.85
%)
13
(50%)
12
(46.15
%)
26
13
Penggunaan gambar berseri
membuat saya tidak merasa bosan
dalam mengikuti aktifitas di kelas.
-
2
(7.69
%)
13
(50%)
11
(42.31
%)
26
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
193
14
Penggunaan gambar berseri
membuat saya lebih percaya diri
dalam menulis karangan bentuk
narrative.
-
3
(11.5
4%)
11
(42.31
%)
12
(46.15
%)
26
15
Penggunaan gambar berseri
membuat saya lebih bersemangat
dan antusias dalam menulis
karangan berbahasa Inggris
narrative
-
3
(11.5
4%)
13
(50%)
10
(38.46
%)
26
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
194
APPENDIX H
Writing Rubric Result
1. Students’ Achievement inPreliminary Study
2. Students’ Achievement in Cycle 1
3. Students’ Achievement in Cycle 2
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
195
Students’ Achievement in Preliminary Study
No Students
Items Being Measured
Score
Total Score
Passing Grade
(65)
Gra
m
Vo
c
Mec
h
Flu
e
Fo
rm
1 Students 1 3 3 3 3 3 15 50.00 Failed
2 Students 2 2 3 3 3 3 14 46.67 Failed
3 Students 3 2 2 3 3 2 12 40.00 Failed
4 Students 4 3 4 5 4 4 20 66.67 Successful
5 Students 5 3 3 3 3 2 14 46.67 Failed
6 Students 6 3 3 4 4 3 17 56.67 Failed
7 Students 7 2 3 3 3 2 13 43.33 Failed
8 Students 8 3 3 4 4 3 17 56.67 Failed
9 Students 9 2 3 4 3 3 15 50.00 Failed
10 Students 10 2 3 3 3 3 14 46.67 Failed
11 Students 11 2 3 3 3 2 13 43.33 Failed
12 Students 12 2 3 3 3 3 14 46.67 Failed
13 Students 13 2 3 3 4 3 15 50.00 Failed
14 Students 14 3 3 3 4 4 17 56.67 Failed
15 Students 15 3 4 5 4 4 20 66.67 Successful
16 Students 16 3 4 4 5 4 20 66.67 Successful
17 Students 17 3 3 4 3 3 16 53.33 Failed
18 Students 18 3 4 3 3 3 16 53.33 Failed
19 Students 19 2 3 4 3 3 15 50.00 Failed
20 Students 20 3 3 4 3 3 16 53.33 Failed
21 Students 21 3 4 5 4 5 21 70.00 Successful
22 Students 22 3 4 5 4 4 20 66.67 Successful
23 Students 23 2 3 4 3 3 15 50.00 Failed
24 Students 24 2 3 3 3 4 15 50.00 Failed
25 Students 25 3 3 4 3 3 16 53.33 Failed
26 Students 26 2 3 3 3 2 12 40.00 Failed
Average 52.44
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
196
Students’ Achievement in Cycle 1
No
. Students’ Numbers
CYCLE 1
Indivi
dual
Draft
Score
Gra
m
Vo
c
Mec
h
Flu
e
Fo
rm
Revised Written Total Score
Note
1 Student 1 70.00 4 5 4 5 5 73.33 Successful
2 Student 2 56.67 3 4 4 4 4 60.00 Failed
3 Student 3 53.33 5 4 4 4 3 70.00 Successful
4 Student 4 66.67 5 5 5 4 4 76.67 Successful
5 Student 5 50.00 3 2 3 4 3 50.00 Failed
6 Student 6 70.00 4 5 4 5 5 76.67 Successful
7 Student 7 56.67 3 4 4 3 4 60.00 Failed
8 Student 8 63.33 5 5 5 5 4 80.00 Successful
9 Student 9 53.33 3 2 4 3 3 50.00 Failed
10 Student 10 60.00 6 5 5 4 5 83.33 Successful
11 Student 11 50.00 4 4 4 3 4 63.33 Failed
12 Student 12 56.67 4 4 4 3 4 63.33 Failed
13 Student 13 63.33 4 4 4 4 5 70.00 Successful
14 Student 14 56.67 4 4 4 4 3 63.33 Failed
15 Student 15 80.00 5 5 5 6 5 86.67 Successful
16 Student 16 70.00 5 6 5 5 5 86.67 Successful
17 Student 17 60.00 4 5 4 4 4 70.00 Successful
18 Student 18 56.67 4 4 3 4 4 63.33 Failed
19 Student 19 56.67 6 5 5 5 5 86.67 Successful
20 Student 20 56.67 5 5 5 4 5 80.00 Successful
21 Student 21 76.67 5 5 5 5 4 80.00 Successful
22 Student 22 63.33 4 5 4 4 4 70.00 Successful
23 Student 23 53.33 5 5 4 3 4 70.00 Successful
24 Student 24 60.00 5 5 5 4 3 73.33 Successful
25 Student 25 56.67 5 5 4 4 3 70.00 Successful
26 Student 26 56.67 4 4 4 4 3 63.33 Failed
Average 60.57 69.87
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
197
Students’ Achievement in Cycle 2
No Student
Number
Individual
drafts
Cycle 2
Gra
m
Vo
c
Mech
Flu
Fo
rm
Revised written
Noted
1 Student 1 73.33 6 5 5 5 5 86.67 Successful
2 Student 2 50.00 4 4 4 4 4 66.67 Successful
3 Student 3 70.00 5 5 5 4 4 76.67 Successful
4 Student 4 63.33 5 6 5 5 6 90.00 Successful
5 Student 5 80.00 4 5 5 5 4 76.67 Successful
6 Student 6 43.33 4 4 4 3 4 63.33 Failed
7 Student 7 73.33 5 5 4 4 4 73.33 Successful
8 Student 8 73.33 5 6 5 4 4 80.00 Successful
9 Student 9 53.33 4 5 5 4 4 73.33 Successful
10 Student 10 50.00 3 4 5 4 3 63.33 Failed
11 Student 11 60.00 3 4 5 3 4 63.33 Failed
12 Student 12 66.67 5 5 4 4 4 73.33 Successful
13 Student 13 43.33 5 3 4 3 4 63.33 Failed
14 Student 14 53.33 5 4 5 5 5 83.33 Successful
15 Student 15 83.33 5 5 5 5 6 90.00 Successful
16 Student 16 70.00 4 4 4 4 4 70.00 Successful
17 Student 17 70.00 5 4 4 5 4 73.33 Successful
18 Student 18 76.67 5 4 5 5 5 80.00 Successful
19 Student 19 63.33 4 4 5 4 5 73.33 Successful
20 Student 20 90.00 6 6 5 6 5 93.33 Successful
21 Student 21 83.33 6 6 5 5 5 90.00 Successful
22 Student 22 70.00 5 5 5 5 5 83.33 Successful
23 Student 23 56.67 5 5 4 3 3 66.67 Successful
24 Student 24 53.33 4 4 4 3 4 63.33 Failed
25 Student 25 66.67 4 5 4 4 4 70.00 Successful
26 Student 26 46.67 4 4 4 4 4 66.67 Successful
Average 64.74 74.36
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
198
APPENDIX I
Samples of Students’ Draft and Revised Draft
1. Sample of Student’s Draft in Cycle 1
2. Sample of Student’s Revised Draft in Cycle 1
3. Sample of Student’s Draft in Cycle 2
4. Sample of Student’s Revised Draft in Cycle 2
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
199
1. Sample of Student’s Draft in Cycle 1
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
200
2. Sample of Student’s Revised Draft in Cycle 1
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
201
3. Sample of Student’s Draft in Cycle 2
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI