+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Date post: 16-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: louise-harrell
View: 216 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
60
Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1
Transcript
Page 1: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Welcome!

Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count

WERA Conference

December 2007

1

Page 2: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Goals for the Afternoon

Share lessons learned from the ASK Project (an assessment design project funded by the National Science Foundation). Designing assessment systems for science curriculum.

Understanding best practices.

2

Page 3: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Purposes

Classroom assessment practicesDevelop assessment strategies and practices that lead to better student achievement and enhance instructional practices.

AccountabilityDevelop assessments with the technical quality needed to provide accountability information to districts.

3

Page 4: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

External Evaluator

BEAR

Charleston

ME ST LP LF

Fresno

ME ID SE MX

Las Vegas

MS IDLF SE EV

Manhattan

HB ST LF LP

Vista

MS FN

Vancouver

PS HB FN MD

San Diego

PS EV

Formative Evaluator

Advisory Board

Madison

WA EM VB MX

Phoenix

WA EM VB MD

LHS

4

Page 5: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Two Reports from NRC

5

Page 6: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

The Assessment Triangle

OBSERVATION INTERPRETATION

COGNITION

6

Page 7: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

The Assessment Triangle

OBSERVATION INTERPRETATION

COGNITION

7

Page 8: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Cognition

The Cognitive Perspective Focuses on how people develop

structures of knowledge—content, reasoning, and problem solving.

The Situative Perspective (Sociocultural) Focuses on how people learn to

participate in the practices, goals, and habits of mind of a particular community.

8

Page 9: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Inquiry

Constructs

9

Page 10: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Physics of Sound

Constructs

10

Page 11: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Progress Levels

Strategic

Conceptual

Recognition

Notions

11

Page 12: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

The Assessment Triangle

OBSERVATION INTERPRETATION

COGNITION

12

Page 13: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Observation—Item Development

Because you can’t see directly into a child’s mind, you have to find ways to infer evidence of learning. Items are written Panels review items Researchers look at cognitive demands Students and teachers test them out! Empirical data informs further revisions

13

Page 14: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

ASK Assessment Items

Embedded Assessment items (diagnostic and part of daily instruction) Notebook entries Notebook sheets Response sheets

Benchmark Assessment items (evaluative, but also formative—given periodically)

Short Answer Open Response Multiple Choice/Multiple Answer

14

Page 15: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Benchmark Assessments

Before starting After Investigation 1 After Investigation 2 After Investigation 3 After Investigation 4 After completing the

module

Survey Inv 1 I-Check Inv 2 I-Check Inv 3 I-Check Inv 4 I-check Posttest

15

Page 16: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

The Assessment Triangle

OBSERVATION INTERPRETATION

COGNITION

16

Page 17: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Coding (scoring) guides—

Based on “Progress Levels”

4 Strategic

3 Conceptual

2 Recognition

1 Notions

0 Makes no attempt

(Coding guides are 0-2, 0-3 or 0-4 depending on the level of the question.)

17

Page 18: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Qualitative Methods Teacher feedback, expert panels and

cognitive analysis.

Quantitative Methods Item Response Theory (statistical analysis) ClassMap (computer program/reports)

Interpretation

18

Page 19: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

The Assessment Triangle

OBSERVATION

(Item development

)

INTERPRETATION

(Coding guides and measurement

model)

COGNITION

(Construct Maps &

Progress Maps) 19

Page 20: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Focus on Embedded Assessment

How is embedded assessment enacted within a curriculum?

Context: Physics of Sound

20

Page 21: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

What students have learned before the lesson we’ll be doing

Sound is caused by vibrations. A sound source is an object that is vibrating.

A sound receiver detects sound vibrations.

Sounds have identifiable properties.

Pitch (a property of sound) is how high or low the sound is (volume = loud or soft).

The faster an object vibrates the higher the pitch (and vice versa).21

Page 22: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Notes to Myself

Review the At-a-Glance chart Read Background for the Teacher and

Teaching Children About… Read through the steps in Guiding the

Investigation

Review the I-Check for Investigation 2

Review the focus questions

Prep for Inv 2

22

Page 23: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Notes to Myself

The three big ideas:

Sounds are caused by vibrations Clarify distinction between pitch and volume

The length of the instrument affects the pitch

Shorter length = higher pitch Longer length = lower pitch

Tension also affects the pitch More tension = higher pitch Less tension = lower pitch

Prep for Inv 2

23

Page 24: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Focus Question

How does length affect the pitch (and therefore the speed of vibrations)?

Record observations:WaterphoneXylophoneKalimbaString Beam

24

Page 25: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Class Discussion

How does length affect the pitch (and therefore the speed of vibrations)?

Record observations:WaterphoneXylophoneKalimbaString Beam

25

Page 26: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Notes to MyselfLength/Pitch

waterphonena √ √ √ √ √ √ na

xylophone √ rev ? ? rev ? ? √

kalimba √ √ rev P/v ? da ? na

String beam √ √ ? √ rev ? ? na

Ada

Badu

Cala

Derek

Edita

Flavo

Gen

Halyn

Key

√ = Got it!

rev = reversed

? = confused

da = didn’t answer the question

na = no answer

26

Page 27: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Notes to MyselfLength/Pitch

27

Can students distinguish high from low pitches?

Do they know the rule?

Why are they inconsistent?

Page 28: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Next Steps

(Can students discriminate pitch?)

Activity:Close your eyes.Listen to the sounds.If the sound has a high pitch, show thumbs up.If the sound has a low pitch, show thumbs down.

28

Page 29: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

What are our “rules?”

The longer the length,

the ___________ the pitch,

29

and the ___________ the vibrations.

Page 30: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

What are our “rules?”

The shorter the length,

the ___________ the pitch,

30

and the ___________ the vibrations.

Page 31: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Next Steps

Statement disagrees with the rule

Statement needs clarification

Statement agrees with the rule

31

•The longer the length, the lower the pitch, the slower the vibrations.

•The shorter the length, the higher the pitch, the faster the vibrations.

Page 32: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

32

Page 33: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

33

Page 34: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Next Steps

Statement disagrees with the rule

Statement needs clarification

Statement agrees with the rule

34

•The longer the length, the lower the pitch, the faster the vibrations.

•The shorter the length, the higher the pitch, the slower the vibrations.

Page 35: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

35

Page 36: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Next Steps

What do the dots tell you about your use of the “rule?”

Rewrite any sentences you marked with a red or yellow dot.

36

Page 37: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

37

Page 38: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Purposes:Summative (measure for giving grades)Formative (continue the learning)

Procedures:Take the testCode, but don’t mark on papersUse self-assessment strategies with students before revealing codes.

38

Benchmark Assessments

Page 39: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Students have Learned… Sound is caused by vibrating objects. Length affects pitch

Longer = lower pitch (slower vibrations) Shorter = higher pitch (faster vibrations)

Tension affects pitch Looser = lower pitch (slower vibrations) Tighter = higher pitch (faster vibrations)

39

Page 40: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Benchmark Assessment Take the I-Check for Investigation 2

40

Page 41: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Behind the scenes

After students take the benchmark, the teacher codes the items to determine what students know and what they still need help with.

The teacher then plans which items to use to help students self-assess their understanding.(we’ll come back to coding later) 41

Page 42: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Self-assessment Strategy Multiple-Choice Corners

Look at item 13

• You will be assigned a letter A, B, or C• (In the classroom students would go to the corner that corresponds with their actual answer.)

• Meet with your group to create an argument to convince the other groups in the room that your answer is the correct one.

• If at some point you “disagree with yourself,” you are allowed to change corners. 42

Page 43: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Self-assessment Strategy Sentence Starters

I used to think….but now I think… I should have gotten this one right, I just…

I know…but I’m still not sure about… The most important thing to remember is…

Can you help me with… Next time I will remember to… I’m confused about… Now I know…

43

Page 44: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Sentence StartersAndy

44

Page 45: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Sentence StartersAndy

45

Page 46: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Sentence StartersRachael

46

Page 47: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Sentence StartersRachael

47

Page 48: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Coding Benchmark ItemsCode If the student…

3

states that the short string will have a higher pitch than the long string (does not need to use the word pitch, but must describe the sound of both strings or make a correct comparison).

2

states that the short string will have a high pitch or the long string will have a low pitch, but does not make a comparison.

1 provides any other answer.

0 makes no attempt.Note: Coding Guides may be 0–2, 0–3 or 0–448

44

Page 49: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Levels of Progress

4 Strategic

3 Conceptual

2 Recognition

1 Notions

0 No attempt

49

Page 50: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Code Inv 2 I-Check

Review the coding guide for first item.

Code responses for all students on that item

Go on to the next item

22 23 24 25 26a

Ada 3

Badu 2

Cala 1

Derek 2

50

Page 51: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

51

Page 52: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

The Development Process Construct Maps and Frameworks Item Development Field Testing Analysis using item response theory software

(ConstructMap) Item fit Standard setting

Iterative revision of items Progress Levels and Maps

52

Page 53: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Does formative assessment matter?

Benchmark scores were not as high as we thought they should be.

When we interviewed teachers they said they looked over students’ shoulders when they wrote in notebooks, but did not critically look at embedded assessment evidence.

Through FAST Project, worked with a small group of teachers to “force” looking at embedded assessments. 53

Page 54: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

1.6 1.2 2.61.615.7 15.9

9.7

22.9

34.9

87.1

60.0

46.7

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1 2 3

Series4Series3Series2Series1

Strategic

Conceptual

Recognition

Notions

54

Magnetism and Electricity

Posttest Results

Page 55: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

ClassMap

Berkeley Evaluation and Assessment Research Center

55

Page 56: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Beliefs and Actions

The most valuable use of assessment is as a learning

tool.

• Embedded assessment is the major focus.

• Assessment data is used to identify gaps in content understanding for both students and teachers.

56

Page 57: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Beliefs and Actions

Students need to take

responsibility for their own

learning through active investigation and reflection.

• Collaboration rather than competition.

• Students have time to reflect on their learning through class interaction and writing-to-learn activities.

• Students are willing to make their thinking public…

• Students self-assess rather than self-evaluate… 57

Page 58: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Beliefs and Actions

Embedded assessment needs to

reflect student thinking and how it changes and develops.

• Students write initial thinking in their notebooks without teacher intervention.

• Students may add additional information (under line of learning) after feedback, class discussion, or further activities.

58

Page 59: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Beliefs and Actions

Students need immediate and effective feedback to improve learning.

• Teachers work to have thorough understanding of the content…

• Teachers look at notebooks after every lesson to reflect on learning and instruction and to determine next-steps.

• Teachers provide feedback as soon and as often as possible.

• Feedback is based on data and provides information for improved understanding.

59

Page 60: Welcome! Making Formative and Benchmark Assessments Count WERA Conference December 2007 1.

Discussion

Questions?

Comments?

60


Recommended