1
Where was the Garden of Eden located: Turkey, Iraq or India? The location of the Garden of Eden is often suggested at Lake Van in Turkey or
at Qurnah in Iraq. In this post we match the geographical descriptions of the
Garden of Eden given in the Bible with the geography of Turkey, Iraq and India.
The purpose of this exercise is to show that the Garden of Eden indeed existed
and it affirms the historicity of the Holy Bible.
Four Rivers of Eden in Bible
The Bible describes the four rivers of Eden as follows: “The name of the first is
Pishon; it runs through the entire land of Havilah… The name of the second
river is Gihon; it runs through the entire land of Cush. The name of the third
river is Hiddekel; it runs along the east side of Assyria. The fourth river is the
Perath (Genesis 2:11-14).
Eden in Turkey| David Rohl| Euphrates| Tigris| Uwzon| Gaihun| Lake
Van
British Egyptologist David Rohl has suggested that Eden could be located at
Lake Van in Turkey. The Hiddekel is the Tigris, the Perath is the Euphrates, the
Gihon is the Aras, and the Pishon is the Uwzon River as marked in Google Earth
picture in Figure 1. We shall discuss these rivers in clockwise direction starting
from the south.
This suggestion is largely
rooted in the similarity
of names. The Pishon is
suggested to be the
Uwzon River because
the alphabet “U” in the
name Uwzon, if
changed to “P,”
becomes Pwzon, which
is similar to Pishon. The
Hiddekel is said to be
Figure 1: Eden in Turkey. Photo: Traced by Author in Google Earth
picture.
2
the Tigris by default since the other three rivers are identified. The Perath is
suggested to be the Euphrates River because the Biblical name Perath is similar
to the name Euphrates. Both names have common consonants “p,” “r,” and
“t/th.” The Gihon is suggested to be the Aras River because the name “Gaihun”
used by Islamic scholars for this river is similar to the Biblical name Gihon. Thus
the Biblical description of four rivers emerging from a mountain matches with
Lake Van.
A difference is that the Biblical narrative revolves around the Pishon and Gihon
Rivers while the Hiddekel and Perath Rivers remain in the background. At Lake
Van, on the other hand, the Tigris and Euphrates are mighty rivers while the
Aras and Uwzon, relatively speaking, remain in the background.
Eden in Iraq| Euphrates| Tigris| Karun| Wady Ermek| Al-Qurnah|
Shatt al-Arab| Strong’s
Another proposed location for Eden is
at Al-Qurnah at the confluence of the
Tigris and Euphrates Rivers as shown in
Figure 2. Names of the four rivers are
circled in this picture. Here, Pishon is
suggested to be Wady Ermek. As in the
previous proposal, the Perath and
Hiddekel are suggested to be the
Euphrates and Tigris Rivers. Lastly,
Gihon is suggested to be the Karun
River. Thus the Biblical description of
four rivers matches with Al-Qurnah.
But locating Eden at Al-Qurnah
demands reconsideration because
here the rivers converge into one
river—the Shatt al-Arab—while,
according to the Bible, one river “went
out” in four rivers at the Garden. The
Bible uses the word “yatsa” for “going
out” (Strong’s 03318). It means: “out” 166 times, “went out” 48 times, “left”
Figure 2: Eden at Al-Qurnah. Photo: Townsend
Maccoun.
3
40 times, “go out” 40 times, “brought out” 38 times, “came out” 26 times… It is
difficult, therefore, to interpret the word “yatsa” as “coming in,” as the
situation is at Al-Qurnah.
The problem of the Biblical narrative revolving around the Pishon and Gihon
Rivers remains here as at Lake Van. The Hiddekel (Tigris) and Perath
(Euphrates) are mighty rivers while the Bible gives no details of these rivers.
The Pishon (Wady Ermek) and Gihon (Karun) re described in detail in the Bible
but are small rivers here.
Eden in the Indus Valley
Now we suggest an alternative location for Eden in the Indus Valley. Four rivers
flow out of Pushkar as shown in Figure 3. The river emerging to the south of
Pushkar is the Sagarmati. We suggest she is the Pishon of the Bible. She flows
near the town of Pisangan. The name “Pishon” and first part “Pisan” of the
name Pisangan both carry the same consonants “p,” “s” and “n” and suggest a
common origin of the two names.
The river emerging to the west of Pushkar is the Saraswati. We suggest she is
the Gihon of the Bible. The river emerging to the northeast is the Nahar. We
suggest she is the Perath River of the Bible. The river emerging to the
southeast is the Dai. We suggest she is the Hiddekel of the Bible.
4
The problem of the
Biblical narrative revolving around the Pishon and Gihon Rivers does not arise
here. The Luni (Gihon), carrying the water of Sagarmati (Pishon), is a mighty
river while the Nahar (Perath) and Dai (Hiddekel) are, relatively speaking, puny
rivers as indicated in the Bible giving no details of them.
Pishon Joins Gihon| Targums| Jonathan| Josephus| Legend of the
Jews| Sea of Suph
The secondary text Targum Jonathan says that the Gihon carried the waters of
the Pishon to the Sea: “And the Mizraee followed after (the Hebrews), and
came upon them as they were encamped by the sea, gathering of pearls and
goodly stones, which the river Pishon had carried from the Garden of Eden into
the Gihon, and the Gihon had carried into the Sea of Suph, and the Sea of Suph
had cast upon its bank” (Exodus 13: 17, italics provided). Jewish Historian
Josephus, writing in Legends of the Jews in the 1st century CE, described the
same situation: “The chariots were laden with silver, gold, and all sorts of
costly things, which the river Pishon, as it flows forth from Paradise, carries
down into the Gihon.” This description does not match with Lake Van where
Gihon (Aras) does not carry waters of Pishon (Uwzon); and also does not match
with Al-Qurnah where Gihon (Karun) does not carry waters of Pishon (Wady
Ermek). In contrast, this is exactly the situation in the Indus Valley where the
Gihon (Saraswati) carries the waters of the Pishon (Sagarmati) as shown in
Figure 3.
“Zahab,” “Bdellium” and “Shoham”| Gum Resin| Arabia| Gold|
Emerald| Beryl| Guggulu| Rajgarh| Mangaliawas
The Bible tells of an association of the Pishon River with three materials: “The…
Pishon… runs through the entire land… where there is zahab. (The zahab of
that land is pure; bdellium and shoham stone are also there)” (Genesis 2:11-
14).
I have found no suggestions for these materials near the Uwzon River in
Turkey, which is identified with the Biblical Pishon.
It is reported that the area through which Wady Ermek flows, “was rich in
bdellium, an aromatic gum resin that can still be found in north Arabia, and
Figure 3: Rivers of Pushkar. Shaded areas indicate mountains.
5
gold, which was still mined in the general area in the 1950s” (Has the Garden
of Eden been located at last? By Dora Jane Hamblin).
We find all the three materials at
Pushkar though with some
unconventional interpretations.
The first material is “Zahab” which
is conventionally identified with
gold. But gold is not found along
the Sagarmati (Pishon). However,
the root of the word “zahab” is “to
shimmer” (Strong’s 02091). Thus,
the two qualities of zahab are
yellow colour, which is derived
from its conventional association
with gold; and shimmering, which is
derived from its grammatical root. The yellow emerald has both these qualities
and is found in the area. Photo of an abandoned emerald mine near Rajgarh is
given in Figure 4. Thus, “zahab” could be the yellow emerald.
The second material is “bdellium,”
which is a gum resin (Strong’s
0916). People harvest a gum resin
from the guggulu plant in the area.
Figure 5 gives picture of gum
oozing from the trunk of a guggulu
tree at the Guggulu Research Farm
at Mangaliawas, located on the
banks of the Sagarmati.
The third material is “shoham”
which means “a precious stone or
gem, probably the beryl (from its
pale green color)” (Strong’s 07718). Beryl is also found in the area as reported
by the Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Rajasthan on its
website under the title “Precious & Semi-Precious Stones in Rajasthan.” Thus,
Figure 4: Abandoned Emerald mine at Rajgarh near
Sagarmati River.
Figure 5: Resin oozing out of guggulu tree, Mangaliawas.
Photo: Author, January 2008.
6
all the three materials associated with the Pishon River are found in the area
south of Pushkar though not in their conventional identifications.
Archaeology| Open Bible| 4000 BCE| Groningen Institute of
Archaeology| Allchin |Rise of Civilization in India and Pakistan| Budha
Pushkar
The Open Bible says that Adam lived around 4000 BCE. Thus the proposed
location of Eden must provide archaeological evidence of habitation at this
time.
The area of Lake Van witnessed the beginning of human habitation and grazing
around 6000 BCE and this supports the possibility that Adam could have lived
here. However, the area was fragile and susceptible to repeated degradation.
A study by the Groningen Institute of Archaeology says: “the decline of grass
steppe… proclaim increasingly arid conditions… The introduction of domestic
cattle in these grasslands readily leads to disturbance and degradation of the
vegetation… The interference of man and his animals with the fragile balance…
probably started the decline of the grass steppe… Pollen values suggest a…
declining agricultural activity towards the end of the 5th millennium BP.”
Further, Lake Van is a dead and extremely saline lake, which does not support
cultivation. Such an area could hardly be a “Garden.”
A large number of ancient archaeological sites are found near Al-Qurnah hence
it is plausible that the area was inhabited at 4000 BCE.
Evidence of habitation is available continuously from the last 200,000 years at
Pushkar. Bridget and Raymond Allchin, authors of The Rise of Civilization in
India and Pakistan, say: “Around the… Budha Pushkar there is concentration of
sites with (small stone tool) industries… these are primarily living or camping
sites… the importance of this unique place may extend back without a break to
prehistoric times.” Thus Al-Qurnah and Pushkar provide supporting
archaeological evidence.
7
Living Traditions| Akdamar| Abraham| Jesus| Adam’s Tree| Brahma|
Temple
The church at Akdamar Island in
Lake Van has stone reliefs depicting
Biblical scenes with Adam, Eve,
Abraham, David and Goliath, and
Jesus as well as earthly themes,
such as hunting scenes and human
and animal figures as shown in
Picture 6. There appears to be no
special living tradition of Adam in
the area.
There is a tradition of the Adam’s
Tree at Qurnah. A plaque announces
that Prophet Abraham had visited
the place in 2000 BCE and said that a
tree would grow at that place
“which is similar to our Father
Adam’s” as shown in Picture 7. This
indicates that the “tradition”
extends only to Prophet Abraham.
The Hindu living tradition says that
Brahma undertook the task of
creation at Pushkar. His main temple
is located here as shown in Picture 8.
Thus we find living tradition only at
Pushkar.
Comparative Assessment
We have marked the evidences at
the three proposed locations in the
Table below. We have given the
evidence in green color where it
matches with the Biblical descriptions, in yellow color where the match is
Figure 6: Stone relief of Adam and Eve at Akdamar
Island, Lake Van.
Figure 7: Plaque of Adam's Tree at Qurnah
Figure 8: Temple of Brahma at Pushkar.
8
weak, and in red colour where the evidence does not match the Biblical
descriptions. In the last row of the Table we have given a numerical summary
with green = 2 points, yellow = 1 point, and red = 0 points. The maximum
possible score is 14 points for the 7 evidences. We find that the score of Lake
Van is 6/14, of Qurnah is 7/14 and Pushkar is 13/14. Thus, we submit, there
exists a good case to examine whether the Garden of Eden could be located at
Pushkar.