+ All Categories
Home > Documents > WtW Bernama BM Final

WtW Bernama BM Final

Date post: 14-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: tessa-j-houghton
View: 228 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 34

Transcript
  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    1/34

    'Watching the Watchdog'Malaysian Media Coverage of GE13

    Final Individual Report: BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

    15/08/13

    Dr Tessa J. HoughtonSchool of Modern Languages and Cultures

    Director of the Centre for the Study of Communications and CultureUniversity of Nottingham Malaysian Campus

    in collaboration with

    Comments and feedback welcomed at:

    [email protected] 523 4575

    or

    Masjaliza HamzahExecutive Officer

    Centre for Independent [email protected]

    03-4023-0772/4024-9840

    The work is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0

    http://www.nottingham.edu.my/Modern-Languages/index.aspxhttp://www.nottingham.edu.my/Modern-Languages/CentrefortheStudyofCommunicationsandCulture/index.aspxmailto:[email protected]://cijmalaysia.org/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/http://www.nottingham.edu.my/Modern-Languages/CentrefortheStudyofCommunicationsandCulture/index.aspxmailto:[email protected]://cijmalaysia.org/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/http://www.nottingham.edu.my/Modern-Languages/index.aspx
  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    2/34

    Table of ContentsExecutive Summary of Key Results for BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA.........................................................3Section 1: Media Coverage of Political Parties & Coalitions.......................................................................... 5

    1.1 Volume of Coverage of Parties & Coalitions......................................................................................... 5Figure 1: Volume of Coverage of Political Parties & Coalitions.......................................................... 5Figure 2: Volume of Coverage of Political Parties & Coalitions: Government vs. Opposition vs.

    Independent/Other........................................................................................................................................61.2 Tone of Coverage of Political Parties & Coalitions...............................................................................7Figure 3: Raw Tonal Coverage Volume of Political Parties & Coalitions............................................7Figure 4: Negative Political Party & Coalition Coverage ....................................................................8Figure 5: Positive Political Party & Coalition Coverage.........................................................................9Figure 6: Tone of Coverage of Political Parties & Coalitions: Government vs. Opposition vs.Independent/Other.....................................................................................................................................10

    Section 2: Media Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures.......................................................................112.1 Volume of Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures.......................................................................11

    Figure 7: Volume of Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures....................................................... 11Figure 8: Volume of Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures: Government vs. Opposition vs.Independent/Other.....................................................................................................................................12

    2.2 Volume of the Use of Politicians & Political Figures as Sources.......................................................13Figure 9: Volume of the Use of Politicians & Political Figures as Sources........................................13Figures 10: Volume of the Use of Politicians & Political Figures As Sources: Government vs.Opposition vs. Independent/Other..........................................................................................................14

    2.3 Tone of Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures............................................................................15Figure 11: Raw Tonal Coverage Volume of Politicians & Political Figures......................................15Figure 12: Negative Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures.......................................................16Figure 13: Positive Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures..........................................................17Figure 14: Tone of Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures: Government vs. Opposition vs.Independent/Other.....................................................................................................................................18

    2.4 Tone of the Use of Politicians & Political Figures As Sources: Attack Politics or Negative

    Campaigning......................................................................................................................................................19Figure 15: Attack Politics: Which Politicians and Political Figures Employ 'Attack Politics' MostOften?............................................................................................................................................................ 19Figure 16: Attack Politics: Which Coalition Employs Attack Politics Most Often?..........................20

    Section 3: Media Coverage of Issues.................................................................................................................213.1 Volume of Media Coverage of Policy Issues vs. Non-Policy Issues..................................................21

    Figure 17: Coverage of Policy Issues vs. Non-Policy Issues.................................................................21Figure 18: Media Coverage of Policy Issues.........................................................................................22Figure 19: Media Coverage of Non-Policy Issues................................................................................23

    Section 4: A Brief Methodology..........................................................................................................................24Section 5: Appendix 1 Tables..........................................................................................................................25

    .................................................................................................................................................................................. 26.................................................................................................................................................................................. 26Section 6: Appendix 2 Coding Scheme......................................................................................................... 32

    2 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    3/34

    Executive Summary of Key Results for BERNAMA BAHASAMALAYSIA

    Introduction

    Like all modern elections, it the Malaysian 13th General Election was fought primarily through themedia the so-called 'watchdogs' of democracy.

    But how effective were Malaysian media outlets at providing fair and objective informationabout national politics? How well did they inform Malaysian citizens about their political environment,and thus enable them to make informed decisions about who to vote for?

    The Watching the Watchdog project monitored coverage from 28 media newspapers, televisionnews broadcasts, online news sites as well as the national press agency, in four languages (English,Bahasa Malaysia, Mandarin, and Tamil); in Sabah and Sarawak as well as in Peninsular Malaysia,during the month spanning April 7th to May 7th 2013 (31 days in total). It is a collaboration betweenthe University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus and the Centre for Independent Journalism.

    The key results summarised below pertain to the individual publication addressed in this report.

    Key Results

    In scrutinising the GE13 coverage provided by Bernama Bahasa Malaysia, we found the followingtrends:

    (1) Coverage of Parties & Coalitions

    The ruling BN coalition and its parties were given the most coverage overall by a significant

    margin.

    Of all the tonal categories used in the coverage of political parties and coalitions, the neutralcategory was used most often (42%), followed by the positive and negative categories (34%and 22% respectively).

    The ruling BN coalition and its parties were given the most positive coverage overall by asignificant margin, while PR and its parties were given the most negative coverage andattacks by significant margins.

    (2) Coverage of Politicians and Political Figures

    Who is talked about the most? And how are they talked about?

    The volume of mention-level coverage given to politicians from both coalitions was relativelyequitable overall, however:

    Of all the tonal categories used in the coverage of politicians and political figures, theneutral category is used the most often (51%), followed by the positive category (27%) thenthe negative category (18%).

    BN politicians were given the most positive coverage by a very significant margin, while PRpoliticians were given the most negative coverage and attacked the most by very significant

    margins.

    3 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    4/34

    Who is used as a source the most? And who engages in attack politics the most?

    Of all the politicians and political figures tracked, Najib Razak and Muhyiddin Yassin weremost commonly used as sources, with their combined use as sources larger than that of the restof the top 10 sources combined, and representing over 60% of all source usage tracked.

    Due in large part to this dominance, BN politicians were used much more often as

    sources overall than PR politicians, who were used as sources under 1% of the time -notably less than independent political figures.

    Muhyiddin Yassin was the source carrying out the highest proportion of all 'attack politics' bya significant margin, followed by Najib Razak.

    Overall, BN coalition politicians engaged in attack politics vastly more often than eitheropposition politicians or independent politicians or political figures.

    In fact, PR politicians were never used as attack sources.

    (3) Policy Issues vs. Non-Policy Issues

    Non-Policy Issues were given more coverage than Policy Issues.

    The Non-Policy Issue of Socioeconomic status was the most covered issue overall.

    4 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    5/34

    Section 1: Media Coverage of Political Parties & Coalitions

    1.1 Volume of Coverage of Parties & Coalitions

    Figure 1: Volume of Coverage of Political Parties & Coalitions

    BN received the most coverage by a very significant margin (43.19%), followed at adistance by PR (13.22%), then PAS, DAP & PKR.

    Refer to Table 1 for figures.

    5 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

    BN

    PR

    PAS

    DAP

    PKR

    UMNO

    MCA

    Other

    MIC

    Gerakan

    SAPP

    PBS

    PSM

    PBB

    SUPP

    PRS

    SPDP

    UPKO

    PRM

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

    43.19

    13.22

    10.97

    8.23

    6.48

    5.69

    3.84

    3.49

    1.30

    0.95

    0.60

    0.45

    0.35

    0.30

    0.30

    0.20

    0.20

    0.20

    0.05

    Volume

  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    6/34

    Figure 2: Volume of Coverage of Political Parties & Coalitions: Government vs.Opposition vs. Independent/Other

    Once parties/coalitions' coverage volumes are combined, the BN coalition again received themost coverage by a significant margin (56.61%), as opposed to PR (38.9%).

    Refer to Table 2 for figures.

    6 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

    BN

    PR

    Independent

    Other

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60

    56.61

    38.90

    1.00

    3.49

    Volume

  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    7/34

    1.2 Tone of Coverage of Political Parties & Coalitions

    Figure 3: Raw Tonal Coverage Volume of Political Parties & Coalitions

    Of all the tonal categories used in the coverage of political parties and coalitions, the neutralcategory was used most often (42%), followed by the positive and negative categories (34%and 22% respectively).

    7 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

    2%

    22%

    42%

    34% Attacked

    Negative

    Neutral

    Positive

  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    8/34

    Figure 4: Negative Political Party & Coalition Coverage

    PR was the most negatively covered (42.6%) and attacked (66.67%) party/coalition by avery significant margin.

    PAS and DAP were second and third most negatively covered, and second and fourth mostattacked, respectively.

    BN was fourth most negatively covered but received no attacks, while PKR was fifth mostnegatively covered and also received no attacks.

    Refer to Table 3 for figures.

    8 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

    PR

    PAS

    DAP

    BN

    PKR

    UMNOOther

    Gerakan

    MCA

    MIC

    PBB

    SPDP

    PBS

    PRS

    PRM

    PSM

    SAPP

    SUPP

    UPKO

    0 20 40 60 80 100 120

    Attacked Negative

    Coverage Volume

  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    9/34

    Figure 5: Positive Political Party & Coalition Coverage

    BN received the most positive (83.41%) and neutral (29.77%) coverage by a very significantmargin, with the opposition coalition/parties receiving very little positive coverage at all.

    Refer to Table 3 for figures.

    9 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

    BN

    PAS

    DAP

    PKR

    MCA

    OtherUMNO

    PR

    MIC

    SAPP

    Gerakan

    PSM

    PBS

    SUPP

    PBB

    UPKO

    PRS

    SPDP

    PRM

    0 20 40 60 80 100 120

    Posi tive Neutral

    Coverage Volume

  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    10/34

    Figure 6: Tone of Coverage of Political Parties & Coalitions: Government vs.Opposition vs. Independent/Other

    When coalition and party coverage is combined into the two opposing coalitions, it becomesvery clear that BN's coverage was very significantly positive, while PR received the mostnegative coverage and attacks. This dichotomous trend was extremely pronounced.

    Refer to Table 4 for figures and below for ratios.

    CoverageType

    BN : PRTonal

    Weighting

    Positive 1 : 0.04 34%Neutral 1 : 0.9 42%

    Negative 1 : 4.6 22%

    Attacked 1 : 34.1 2%

    10 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

    Attacked

    Negative

    Neutral

    Positive

    Attacked

    Negative

    Neutral

    Positive

    Attacked

    Negative

    Neutral

    Positive

    BN

    PR

    Independent & Other

    0 20 40 60 80 100 120

    2.56

    17.31

    47.75

    96.04

    87.18

    80.18

    43.62

    3.38

    10.26

    2.51

    8.63

    0.59

    Coverage Volume

  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    11/34

    Section 2: Media Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures

    2.1 Volume of Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures

    Figure 7: Volume of Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures

    Only the top 20 most mentioned politicians are shown on this graph.

    Out of these 20, Najib Razak received the most mentions by a significant proportion(31.59%), followed by Lim Kit Siang, Muhyiddin Yassin and Mahathir Mohamad, with AnwarIbrahim coming in with fifth most mentions overall.

    Refer to Table 5 for full figures.

    11 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

    Najib Razak

    Lim Kit Siang

    Muhyiddin YassinMahathir Mohamad

    Anwar Ibrahim

    Nik Aziz

    Karpal Singh

    Lim Guan Eng

    Musa Aman

    Hadi Awang

    Azmin Ali

    Khalid Ibrahim

    Nizar Jamaluddin

    Taib Mahmud

    Tian ChuaBernard Dompok

    Chua Soi Lek

    Khalid Samad

    Hishamuddin Hussein

    Ibrahim Ali

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

    31.59

    9.55

    7.737.05

    5.91

    4.32

    4.09

    2.95

    2.95

    2.73

    2.05

    2.05

    2.05

    1.82

    1.821.59

    1.36

    1.36

    0.91

    0.91

    Coverage Volume

  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    12/34

    Figure 8: Volume of Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures: Government vs.Opposition vs. Independent/Other

    When the mentions of individual politicians and political figures are combined and mergedinto their respective coalitions, we can see that coverage of figures from both major coalitionswas skewed slightly towards BN.

    Refer to Table 6 for figures.

    12 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

    57%

    41%

    2%

    BN

    PR

    Independent/Other

  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    13/34

    2.2 Volume of the Use of Politicians & Political Figures as Sources

    Figure 9: Volume of the Use of Politicians & Political Figures as Sources

    Of the politicians and political figures tracked, Najib Razak and Muyiddin Yassin were mostcommonly used as sources by a huge margin - their combined use as sources represents over60% of all source use - with the bulk of this coming from Razak's huge 41.99% of all sourceuse.

    This dominance flows on to the next graph which shows combined source use from eachcoalition across all politicians tracked.

    Interestingly, while Muhyiddin was spoken about relatively little, he was used as a source or

    allowed to speak very often. Opposition politicians were used as sources very rarely, with both the EC Spokespeople and

    Vox Pop opinions from the rakyat used significantly more often.

    Refer to Table 7 for figures.

    13 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

    Najib Razak

    Muhyiddin Yassin

    Vox Pop Male

    Election Commission Spokesperson

    Vox Pop Female

    Chua Soi Lek

    Musa Aman

    Hadi Awang

    Public Opinion/Vox Pop General

    Mahathir Mohamad

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

    41.99

    19.26

    18.54

    6.10

    5.38

    3.35

    2.39

    0.84

    0.84

    0.72

    Coverage Volume

  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    14/34

    Figures 10: Volume of the Use of Politicians & Political Figures As Sources: Governmentvs. Opposition vs. Independent/Other

    Politicians from BN were used as sources much more often (68.18%) than both independentpolitical figures and PR, whose politicians received under 1% use as sources.

    Refer to Table 7 for figures.

    14 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

    73%

    1%

    26%

    BN

    PR

    Independent/Other

  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    15/34

    2.3 Tone of Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures

    Figure 11: Raw Tonal Coverage Volume of Politicians & Political Figures

    Of all the tonal categories used in the coverage of politicians and political figures, theneutral category is used the most often (51%), followed by the positive category (27%) thenthe negative category (18%).

    15 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

    27%

    51%

    18%

    4%

    Positive

    Neutral

    Negative

    Attacked

  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    16/34

    Figure 12: Negative Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures

    In terms of the tone of mentions of politicians and political figures, Lim Kit Siang received themost negative coverage (16.88%), followed by Anwar Ibrahim, Karpal Singh, Hadi Awang,and Nizar Jamaluddin.

    Nik Aziz was overwhelmingly the most attacked political figure (52.94%), followed by AnwarIbrahim, Nizar Jamaluddin, and Tian Chua, all in second equal position. Khalid Ibrahim andAlfred Jabu are the third equal most attacked.

    Notably, BN political figures were very rarely attacked or covered negatively.

    Refer to Table 8 for full figures.

    16 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

    Lim Kit Siang

    Anwar Ibrahim

    Karpal Singh

    Hadi Awang

    Nizar Jamaluddin

    Khalid Ibrahim

    Azmin Ali

    Lim Guan Eng

    Mahathir Mohamad

    Nik Aziz

    Tian Chua

    Dzulkefly Ahmad

    Muhyiddin Yassin

    Khalid Samad

    Mohamad 'Mat' Sabu

    Alfred Jabu

    Abdul Rahman Dahlan

    Ambiga Sreenevasan

    Baru Bian

    Bernard DompokChong Chieng Jen

    Chua Soi Lek

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60

    Attacked Negative

    Coverage Volume

  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    17/34

    Figure 13: Positive Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures

    In terms of the tone of mentions of politicians and political figures, Najib Razak received themost positive (55.75%) and neutral coverage (35.05%) by a very significant margin.

    Muhyiddin Yassin received the second most positive coverage (17.7%), followed by MahathirMohamad (15.04%).

    Refer to Table 8 for figures.

    17 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

    Najib RazakLim Kit Siang

    Muhyiddin Yassin

    Mahathir Mohamad

    Anwar Ibrahim

    Musa Aman

    Karpal Singh

    Lim Guan Eng

    Taib Mahmud

    Bernard Dompok

    Chua Soi Lek

    Nik Aziz

    Khalid Samad

    Hadi Awang

    Ibrahim Ali

    Rosmah Mansur

    Azmin Ali

    Hishamuddin Hussein

    Tian Chua

    Baru BianKhalid Ibrahim

    Liow Tiong Lai

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Posi tive Neutral

    Coverage Volume

  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    18/34

    Figure 14: Tone of Coverage of Politicians & Political Figures: Government vs.Opposition vs. Independent/Other

    Overall, much more positive coverage was given to BN politicians (over 98%), while PRpoliticians were given much more negative coverage (92.21%) and attacks (94.12%).

    Refer to Table 9 for figures and below for ratios.

    Ratio Type BN : PRTonal

    Weighting

    Positive 1 : 0.02 26%

    Neutral 1 : 0.6 49%

    Negative 1 : 11.8 18%

    Attacked 1 : 16 4%

    18 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

    Attacked

    Negative

    Neutral

    Positive

    Attacked

    Negative

    Neutral

    Positive

    Attacked

    Negative

    Neutral

    Positive

    BN

    PR

    Independent/Other

    0 20 40 60 80 100 120

    5.88

    7.79

    61.68

    98.23

    94.12

    92.21

    34.58

    1.77

    0.00

    0.00

    3.74

    0.00

    Coverage Volume

  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    19/34

    2.4 Tone of the Use of Politicians & Political Figures As Sources: AttackPolitics or Negative Campaigning

    Figure 15: Attack Politics: Which Politicians and Political Figures Employ 'Attack Politics'

    Most Often?

    This graph is weighted to show attack politics as a proportion of overall use as source.

    Najib Razak (43.75%) was most commonly engaged in attack politics, followed by MuhyiddinYassin (31.25%). Male members of the rakyat were third most likely to be given space tovoice political attacks.

    The opposition leaders did not register, showing that they were a) rarely given the chance toappear as sources, and b) when they did so, they were not quoted as attacking.

    Refer to Table 10 for figures.

    19 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

    Najib Razak

    Muhyiddin Yassin

    Vox Pop Male

    Nazri Aziz

    Ambiga Sreenevasan

    Anwar Ibrahim

    Baru Bian

    Chua Soi Lek

    Hadi Awang

    Hassan Ali

    Jeffrey Kitingan

    Khalid Ibrahim

    Lim Guan Eng

    Lim Kit Siang

    Mahathir Mohamad

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

    43.75

    31.25

    18.75

    6.25

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    Attack Volume

  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    20/34

    Figure 16: Attack Politics: Which Coalition Employs Attack Politics Most Often?

    This graph is weighted to show attack politics as a proportion of overall use as source.

    Overall, BN coalition politicians engaged in attack politics vastly more often than eitheropposition politicians or independent politicians or political figures.

    Indeed, PR politicians were never used as attack sources.

    Refer to Table 10 for figures.

    20 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

    81%

    19%

    BN

    PR

    Independent/Other

  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    21/34

    Section 3: Media Coverage of Issues

    3.1 Volume of Media Coverage of Policy Issues vs. Non-Policy Issues

    Figure 17: Coverage of Policy Issues vs. Non-Policy Issues

    Significantly more coverage overall was given to Non-Policy Issues than Policy Issues.

    Refer to Table 11 for figures.

    21 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

    44%

    56%

    Policy Issues

    Non-Policy Issues

  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    22/34

    Figure 18: Media Coverage of Policy Issues

    Of all Policy Issues covered, Vision Policies and Programmes were given the most attention,followed by the Economy & Development; Domestic Policy, Crime & National Security; thenReligion.

    Refer to Table 11 for figures.

    22 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

    37%

    1%

    32%

    7%

    0%

    11%

    0%

    11%

    Policy Issues

    VisionPolicies/ProgrammesEnvironmentEconomy/DevelopmentEducationForeign PolicyDomestic Policy, Crime &National SecurityOppressive LegislationHealthReligion

  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    23/34

    Figure 19: Media Coverage of Non-Policy Issues

    Of all Non-Policy Issues covered, Socioeconomic Status was given the most coverage,followed by Electioneering and then Ethnicity.

    Refer to Table 11 for figures.

    23 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

    19%

    4%

    18%

    34%

    0%3%

    22%

    Non-Policy Issues

    Ethnicity

    Religion

    Democracy & Human Rights

    Socioeconomic Status

    Mudslinging

    Gender

    Electioneering

  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    24/34

    Section 4: A Brief Methodology

    Dates analysed: 7/4/13 07/05/13 (nd = 31 days)

    Number of data points/references identified and analysed: ndp = 8023

    Number of articles identified and analysed: na = 277

    Average number of articles/day: na/d = 8.9

    Data Collection

    The data was collected or 'coded' using sentence-level content analysis. A team of around 70'coders' from all over Malaysia, from both private and public universities, and from civil society,coded their assigned media on a daily basis.

    Stories 'coded' were selected according to the following criteria:

    They were within the Malaysian news section/s of the newspapers including the front page, orwere the paper's editorial (if they run one).

    They were from pre-defined 'Malaysian News' areas of the news websites monitored, with'snapshots' taken at 8pm daily.

    They were from within the TV news broadcasts.

    They were more than 1/3 about the election, and were news stories as opposed to columns,opinions pieces, letters, etc (with the exception of the paper's own editorial, if present).

    Within each story, category/operator references were identified and coded at the sentence level

    (from period to period). The 21 categories identified and their sub-categories or 'operators' areoutlined in Appendix 2. These 21 categories form the 'unit of analysis' for this study.

    Tone (positive, negative, neutral, attacking, or attacked) was determined based on matching eachreference to a media frame or frames, supportable via emotive/descriptive/subjectivelanguage/vocabulary utilised by the either the news personnel or the source beingquoted/paraphrased. As such, tone is not based upon coder opinion but on linguistic data. Coderswere instructed to 'code as neutral' whenever there was a lack of linguistic data to support apositive/negative/attacking/attacked frame, or whenever they were unsure/conflicted.

    Data Analysis

    The data was analysed using the open source software package GNU Octave (a multi-disciplinarymathematical data analysis programme capable of SPSS/NVIVO-level statistical analysis, as well asmuch higher-level mathematical analysis). Scripts were composed to count occurrences of key data-codes, as specified by the project's finite code-listing set (see Appendix 2), for every row of codeddata (i.e. every reference). Where appropriate, code-count occurrences have been normalised toprovide the percentage of these key-code occurrences.

    24 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

    http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/
  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    25/34

    Section 5: Appendix 1 Tables

    25 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

    TABLE 1

    Party Percentage

    BN 43.192

    DAP 8.2294

    Gerakan 0.94763

    MCA 3.8404

    MIC 1.2968

    PAS 10.973

    PBB 0.29925

    PBS 0.44888

    PKR 6.4838

    PR 13.217

    PRS 0.1995

    PRM 0.049875PSM 0.34913

    SAPP 0.5985

    SPDP 0.1995

    SUPP 0.29925

    UMNO 5.6858

    UPKO 0.1995

    Other 3.4913

    TABLE 2

    Party Percentage Coalition Percentage

    BN 43.192

    BN 56.60851

    Gerakan 0.94763

    MCA 3.8404

    MIC 1.2968

    PBB 0.29925

    PBS 0.44888

    PRS 0.1995

    SPDP 0.1995

    SUPP 0.29925

    UMNO 5.6858

    UPKO 0.1995

    PR 13.217

    PR 38.9032DAP 8.2294

    PAS 10.973

    PKR 6.4838

    PRM 0.049875

    Independent 0.997505PSM 0.34913

    SAPP 0.5985

    Other 3.4913 Other 3.4913

    TABLE 3

    Attacked Negative Neutral Positive TOTAL

    BN 0 10.478 29.769 83.407 123.654

    DAP 7.6923 12.301 12.272 0.88106 33.14636

    Gerakan 0 0.45558 1.0936 1.1747 2.72388

    MCA 0 0.45558 6.1968 3.5242 10.17658

    MIC 0 0.45558 2.1871 0.88106 3.52374

    PAS 12.821 18.451 15.188 1.0279 47.4879

    PBB 0 0.22779 0.48603 0.14684 0.86066

    PBS 0 0 0.60753 0.44053 1.04806

    PKR 0 6.8337 11.543 0.73421 19.11091

    PR 66.667 42.597 4.6173 0.73421 114.61551

    PRS 0 0 0.24301 0.29369 0.5367

    PRM 0 0 0.12151 0 0.12151

    PSM 0 0 0.85055 0 0.85055

    SAPP 0 0 1.4581 0 1.4581

    SPDP 0 0.22779 0.12151 0.29369 0.64299

    SUPP 0 0 0.60753 0.14684 0.75437

    UMNO 2.5641 5.0114 5.9538 5.7269 19.2562

    UPKO 0 0 0.48603 0 0.48603

    Other 10.256 2.5057 6.1968 0.58737 19.54587

    Parties &Coalitions

  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    26/34

    26 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

    TABLE 4

    BN

    A ttacked 2.5641

    Negative 15.71719

    Neutral 4 7.75194

    Positive 96.03545

    PR

    A ttacked 87.1803

    Negative 80.1827

    Neutral 43.6203

    Positive 3.37738

    A ttacked 10.256

    Negative 2.5057

    Neutral 8.62696

    Positive 0.58737

    Independent &

    Other

    TABLE 5

    Politician/Political Figure

    Abdul Rahman Dahlan 0.45455

    Alfred Jabu 0.45455

    Ambiga Sreenevasan 0

    Anwar Ibrahim 5.9091Azmin Ali 2.0455

    Baru Bian 0.45455

    Bernard Dompok 1.5909

    Chong Chieng Jen 0

    Chua Soi Lek 1.3636

    Dzulkefly Ahmad 0.45455

    Elizabeth Wong 0

    G. Palanivel 0

    Hadi Awang 2.7273

    Hassan Ali 0

    Hishamuddin Hussein 0.90909

    Ibrahim Ali 0.90909

    James Masing 0.45455

    Jeffrey Kitingan 0

    Karpal Singh 4.0909

    Khalid Ibrahim 2.0455

    Khalid Samad 1.3636

    Lim Guan Eng 2.9545

    Lim Kit Siang 9.5455

    Liow Tiong Lai 0.45455

    Mahathir Mohamad 7.0455Maximus Ongkili 0.45455

    Mohamad 'Mat' Sabu 0.45455

    Muhyiddin Yassin 7.7273

    Musa Aman 2.9545

    Najib Razak 31.591

    Ng Yen Yen 0

    Nik Aziz 4.3182

    Nizar Jamaluddin 2.0455

    Nurul Izzah 0.22727

    Rafizi Ramli 0.22727Rosmah Mansur 0.90909

    Siti Mariah Mahmud 0.22727

    Taib Mahmud 1.8182

    Teresa Kok 0

    Tian Chua 1.8182

    Tony Pua 0

    William Mawan 0

    Wong Ho Leng 0

    Wong Soon Koh 0

    Yong Teck Lee 0

    Percentage(mention)

  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    27/34

    27 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

    TABLE 6

    Politician/Political Figure Party etc. Percentage Coalition Percentage

    Chua Soi Lek

    MCA 1.81815

    BN 57.27284

    Liow Tiong Lai

    Ng Yen Yen

    G. Palanivel MIC 0

    Alfred Jabu PBB 2.27275Taib Mahmud

    Maximus Ongkili PBS 0.45455

    James Masing PRS 0.45455

    William Mawan SPDP 0

    Wong Soon Koh SUPP 0

    Abdul Rahman Dahlan

    UMNO 50.68194

    Hishamuddin Hussein

    Mahathir Mohamad

    Muhyiddin Yassin

    Musa AmanNajib Razak

    Bernard Dompok UPKO 1.5909

    Chong Chieng Jen

    DAP 16.5909

    PR 40.90926

    Karpal Singh

    Lim Guan Eng

    Lim Kit Siang

    Teresa Kok

    Tony Pua

    Wong Ho Leng

    Dzulkefly Ahmad

    PAS 11.59097

    Hadi Awang

    Khalid Samad

    Mohamad 'Mat' Sabu

    Nik Aziz

    Nizar Jamaluddin

    Siti Mariah Mahmud

    Anwar Ibrahim

    PKR 12.72739

    Azmin Ali

    Baru Bian

    Elizabeth Wong

    Jeffrey KitinganKhalid Ibrahim

    Nurul Izzah

    Rafizi Ramli

    Tian Chua

    Ambiga Sreenevasan Bersih 0

    1.81818

    Hassan Ali Independent 0

    Ibrahim Ali Perkasa 0.90909

    Rosmah Mansur 0.90909

    Yong Teck Lee SAPP 0

    Independent/Ot

    her'1st lady'

  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    28/34

    28 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

    TABLE 7

    Politician/Political Figure Coalition Percentage

    Chua Soi Lek 3.3493

    BN 68.18177

    Mahathir Mohamad 0.7177

    Muhyiddin Yassin 19.258Musa Aman 2.3923

    Najib Razak 41.986

    Nazri Aziz 0.47847

    Taib Mahmud 0

    Anwar Ibrahim 0

    PR 0.95694

    Baru Bian 0

    Hadi Awang 0.83732

    Jeffrey Kitingan 0

    Khalid Ibrahim 0

    Lim Guan Eng 0Lim Kit Siang 0.11962

    Nik Aziz 0

    Ambiga Sreenevasan 0

    Independent 23.9238Hassan Ali 0

    Vox Pop Male 18.541

    Vox Pop Female 5.3828

    Percentage(source)

  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    29/34

    29 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

    TABLE 8

    Politician/Political Figure Attacked Negative Neutral Positive

    Abdul Rahman Dahlan 0 0 0 1.7699

    Alfred Jabu 5.8824 0 0.46729 0

    Ambiga Sreenevasan 0 0 0 0

    Anwar Ibrahim 11.765 12.987 4.2056 0

    Azmin Ali 0 5.1948 1.4019 0.88496Baru Bian 0 0 0.93458 0

    Bernard Dompok 0 0 2.8037 0.88496

    Chong Chieng Jen 0 0 0 0

    Chua Soi Lek 0 0 2.8037 0

    Dzulkefly Ahmad 0 2.5974 0 0

    Elizabeth Wong 0 0 0 0

    G. Palanivel 0 0 0 0

    Hadi Awang 0 10.39 1.8692 0

    Hassan Ali 0 0 0 0

    Hishamuddin Hussein 0 0 1.4019 0Ibrahim Ali 0 0 1.8692 0

    James Masing 0 0 0 1.7699

    Jeffrey Kitingan 0 0 0 0

    Karpal Singh 0 12.987 3.7383 0

    Khalid Ibrahim 5.8824 7.7922 0.93458 0

    Khalid Samad 0 1.2987 2.3364 0

    Lim Guan Eng 0 5.1948 3.7383 0

    Lim Kit Siang 0 16.883 9.8131 0

    Liow Tiong Lai 0 0 0.93458 0

    Mahathir Mohamad 0 5.1948 4.6729 15.044

    Maximus Ongkili 0 0 0.93458 0

    Mohamad 'Mat' Sabu 0 1.2987 0.46729 0

    Muhyiddin Yassin 0 2.5974 5.6075 17.699

    Musa Aman 0 0 3.7383 4.4248

    Najib Razak 0 0 35.047 55.752

    Ng Yen Yen 0 0 0 0

    Nik Aziz 52.941 3.8961 2.3364 0.88496

    Nizar Jamaluddin 11.765 7.7922 0 0

    Nurul Izzah 0 0 0.46729 0

    Rafizi Ramli 0 0 0.46729 0

    Rosmah Mansur 0 0 1.8692 0Siti Mariah Mahmud 0 0 0.46729 0

    Taib Mahmud 0 0 3.271 0.88496

    Teresa Kok 0 0 0 0

    Tian Chua 11.765 3.8961 1.4019 0

    Tony Pua 0 0 0 0

    William Mawan 0 0 0 0

    Wong Ho Leng 0 0 0 0

    Wong Soon Koh 0 0 0 0

    Yong Teck Lee 0 0 0 0

  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    30/34

    30 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

    TABLE 10

    Politician/Political Figure Coalition Percentage

    Chua Soi Lek 0

    BN 81.25

    Mahathir Mohamad 0

    Muhyiddin Yassin 31.25

    Musa Aman 0

    Najib Razak 43.75

    Nazri Aziz6.25Taib Mahmud 0

    Anwar Ibrahim 0

    PR 0

    Baru Bian 0

    Hadi Awang 0

    Jeffrey Ki tingan 0

    Khalid Ibrahim 0

    Lim Guan Eng 0

    Lim Kit Siang 0

    Nik Aziz 0

    Ambiga Sreenevasan 0

    Independent 18.75

    Hassan Ali 0

    Vox Pop Male 18.75

    Vox Pop Female 0

    0

    0

    Percentage

    (source +attacking)

    Public Opinion/Vox PopGeneral

    Election CommissionSpokesperson

    TABLE 9

    BN

    Attacked 5.8824

    Negative 7.7922

    Neutral 61.68245

    Positive 98.22952

    PR

    Attacked 94.1184

    Negative 92.208

    Neutral 34.57942

    Positive 1.76992

    Attacked 0

    Negative 0

    Neutral 3.7384

    Positive 0

    Independent/

    Other

  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    31/34

    31 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

    TABLE 11

    Issues Coverage PI/NPI Coverage

    Vision Policies/Programmes 11.349

    Policy Issues 30.512658

    Environment 0.34843

    Economy/Development 9.7063

    Education 1.991

    Foreign Policy 0.049776

    Domestic Policy, Crime & National Security 3.4843

    Oppressive Legislation 0.099552

    Health 0

    Religion 3.4843

    Ethnicity 7.6157

    39.47273

    Religion 1.5431

    Democracy & Human Rights 6.9189

    Socioeconomic Status 13.39

    Mudslinging 0.14933

    Gender 1.0951Electioneering 8.7606

    Non-PolicyIssues

  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    32/34

    Section 6: Appendix 2 Coding Scheme

    1. Politician or Political Figure (Mentioned)

    1. Abdul Rahman Dalan

    2. Alfred Jabu3. Ambiga Sreenevasan4. Anwar Ibrahim5. Azmin Ali6. Baru Bian7. Bernard Dompok8. Chong Chieng Jen9. Chua Soi Lek10. Dzulkefly Ahmad11. Elizabeth Wong12. G. Palanivel13. Hadi Awang14. Hassan Ali15. Hishamuddin Hussein

    16. James Masing17. Jeffrey Kitingan18. Karpal Singh19. Khalid Ibrahim20. Khalid Samad21. Lim Guan Eng22. Lim Kit Siang23. Liow Tiong Lai24. Mahathir Mohamad25. Maximus Ongkili26. Mohamad 'Mat' Sabu27. Muhyiddin Yassin28. Musa Aman

    29. Najib Razak30. Ng Yen Yen31. Nik Aziz32. Nizar Jamaluddin33. Nurul Izzah34. Rafizi Ramli35. Rosmah Mansur36. Siti Mariah Mahmud37. Taib Mahmud38. Teresa Kok39. Tian Chua40. Tony Pua41. William Mawan42. Wong Ho Leng

    43. Wong Soon Koh44. Yong Teck Lee

    2. Politicians or Political Figure (Used as a Source)

    1. Ambiga Sreenevasan (Bersih)2. Anwar Ibrahim (PKR)3. Baru Bian4. Chua Soi Lek5. Hadi Awang6. Hassan Ali7. Jeffrey Kitingan8. Khalid Ibrahim9. Lim Guan Eng

    10. Lim Kit Siang11. Mahathir Mohamad

    12. Muhyiddin Yassin13. Musa Aman14. Najib Razak

    15. Nazri Aziz16. Nik Aziz17. Taib Mahmud18. Vox Pop Male19. Vox Pop Female20. Public Opinion/Vox Pop General21. Election Commission Spokesperson

    3. Party or Coalition

    1. BN (Barisan Nasional)2. DAP (Democratic Action Party)3. Gerakan (Malaysian People's Movement

    Party)

    4. MCA (Malaysian Chinese Association)5. MIC (Malaysian Indian Congress)6. PAS (Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party)7. PBB (Parti Besaka Bumputera Bersatu)8. PBS (Parti Bersatu Sabah)9. PKR (People's Justice Party)10. PR (Pakatan Rakyat)11. PRS (Sarawak People's Party)12. PRM (Parti Rakyat Malaysia)13. PSM (Parti Sosialis Malaysia)14. SAPP (Sabah Progressive Party)15. SPDP (Sarawak Progressive Democratic Party)16. SUPP (Sarawak United People's Party)

    17. UMNO (United Malays National Organisation)18. UPKO (United Pasokmomogun KadazandusunMurut Organisation)

    4. Organisations

    1. Bersih2. Community-based organisations.3. Democracy- or human rights-oriented

    organisations (excluding Bersih)4. Environmentally-oriented organisations5. Ethnicity-oriented organisations6. JATI7. Perkasa8. Professionals organisations9. Religious organisations.10. Trade Unions11. Womens' rights or issues focused organisations.12. Youth or student focused organisations13. Election Commission

    5. Policy Issues

    1. Vision Policies or Programmes1. 1Malaysia2. GTP (Government Transformation

    Programme)3. ETP (Economic Transformation Programme)

    4. NKRA (National Key Results Areas)5. NEP/'Bumiputeraism'

    32 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    33/34

    6. PAS's Welfare State7. PKR's Buku Jingga8. NEM (New Economic Model)9. 'Transformasi'10. BN Manifesto11. PR Manifesto12. Other

    2. Environment1. Deforestation/Land Rights2. Recycling3. Lynas4. Polluting Industries (non-Lynas)5. Damming Projects6. Other

    3. Economy/Development1. Recession2. Welfare3. Unemployment4. Poverty5. Privatisation6. Growth/FDI7. FTA/Globalisation8. Inflation/Price Rises9. Infrastructure10. Housing11. Other

    4. Education1. Vernacular Schools2. Access3. PPSMI4. Academic Freedom5. System

    6. PTPTN7. Other

    5. Foreign Policy1. Western World2. Singapore (Mentions of)3. Singapore (Comparison with)4. China5. India6. Islamic World7. Israel/Palestine8. Indonesia9. Other

    6. Domestic Policy, Crime, & National Security1. Immigration2. Illegals/Refugees3. Terrorism (not Lahad Datu)4. Crime5. Lahad Datu Incident6. Other

    7. Oppressive Legislation1. ISA (Internal Security Act)2. AUKU/UUCA (Universities and University

    Colleges Act 1971)3. Sedition Act

    4. PPPA (Printing Presses and Publication Act)5. PAA (Peaceful Assembly Act 2012)

    6. SOSMA (Security Offences (SpecialMeasures) Act 2012)

    7. Other

    8. Health1. 1Care2. Other

    9. Religion1. Apostasy2. Islamic State3. Hudud4. Conversion (into Islam)5. 'Allah' issue6. Other

    6. Non-Policy Issues

    1. Ethnicity1. Malaysia2. Chinese3. Indian/South Asian4. Orang Asli5. Orang Asal, Sabah & Sarawak6. Thai7. Portuguese/Eurasian8. Malay Rights9. Other

    2. Religion1. Islam2. Buddhism/Taoism3. Hinduism4. Christianity5. Sikhism

    6. Religious Freedom (non-apostasy related)7. Interfaith Dialogue/Unity8. Interfaith Friction9. Other

    3. Democracy & Human Rights1. General Corruption2. Electoral Corruption3. Media Freedom4. Electoral Reform5. Electoral Legislation6. 2-Party System7. Protest/Rallies8. Other

    4. Socioeconomic Sectors1. Middle Class/Professionals2. Working Class3. Aristocracy/Monarchy4. Civil Service5. Military and Police6. FELDA7. Plantation/Estate Workers8. Chine New Villagers9. Senior Citizens/Retirees10. RELA/Wataniah11. Urban

    12. Rural13. Cost of Living

    33 BERNAMA BAHASA MALAYSIA

  • 7/29/2019 WtW Bernama BM Final

    34/34

    14. Other

    5. Territory1. Kuala Lumpur2. Labuan3. Putrajaya4. Johor5. Kedah

    6. Kelantan7. Malacca8. Negeri Sembilan9. Pahang10. Perak11. Perlis12. Penang13. Sabah14. Sarawak15. Selangor16. Terengganu17. Sarawak Independence18. Sabah Independence

    6. Mudslinging1. Anwar/Sodomy2. Altantuya3. Rosmah4. Penang CM5. Selangor CM6. NFC7. Arms Deals8. Psy/CNY Concert9. Project IC10. Taib Mahmud and Logging Expose11. Other

    7. Gender

    1. Sexuality2. Women in politics3. Personal/Private life4. Womens' Issues5. LGBT/Q6. Appearance

    7. Sexism8. Other

    8. Electioneering1. Event-specific Gifts2. Handouts3. Timely Developments4. Election Promises5. Baby-kissing6. Cybertroopers/Social Media War7. Other


Recommended