OCSE’s Efforts to Enhance Interstate
Communication
ERICSA 2011Atlantic City, New Jersey
May 22, 2011
1
Agenda
• Intergovernmental Referral Guide (IRG)– Ella Wood and Angela Kasey
• Interstate Case Reconciliation (ICR) Project– Pat Conrad
• Child Support Enforcement Network (CSENet)– Vinette Elam
• Query Interstate Cases for Kids (QUICK)– Vinette Elam
2
What you Can See by Using the IRG
3
What is the IRG?
The IRG is: An information resource tool
containing:
– Profiles of policies and statutory authorities
– Location Codes and Addresses
An interactive website
4
At-A-Glance Profiles State and tribal profiles contain information
regarding:– General/State/Tribe-at-a-Glance– Reciprocity– Age of majority– Statutes of limitations– Support details– Income withholding– Paternity– Support order establishment– Support enforcement– Modification and review/adjustment– Lump sum payments– Insurance match
5
Location Codes and Addresses
The Location Codes and Addresses section contains: State contact data
−Regional −County
Tribal contact data−Names, addresses, telephone numbers and, when available,
fax numbers and email addresses−Tribal Address Types: Tribal Office 1
Central and regional OCSE offices contact dataInternational contact data
6
OCSE Home Page
7
IRG Home Page
8
Public Access
9
Public Access • State and tribal profile download• Profile query• State addresses
– Automated interstate case status request– Automated interstate payment request– Central registry– Employer assistance contact– State disbursement unit– State IV-D director– State parent locator service– Domestic violence contact
• International Addresses– Canadian provinces
• Comprehensive Tribes• Tribal Office 1
10
View Access
11
View AccessState and Tribal Caseworkers
• State and tribal profile download• Profile query• State address types • State region address types • County addresses types• International addresses• Comprehensive tribes’ addresses• OCSE central contacts• OCSE regional contacts
12
Edit Access
13
Edit Access State and Tribal Administrators
• Edit all IRG data• Certify all IRG data• Disseminate state/tribal view user password
to all caseworkers• Attend OCSE IRG conference calls• Point of contact for state or tribal IRG data
14
OCSE Administrators
• Maintain and certify– OCSE central office addresses– OCSE regional office addresses– International addresses
• OCSE offers additional support– State liaison– Data quality and data correction– Unlock accounts– Provide username and passwords– Training and technical assistance
15
Enhancements
• Summer 2011– IRG password security protocols– Data quality reviews– Domestic violence contact information
• Future– Automatic password reset– Domestic violence profile questions
16
Questions or Comments
17
IRG Resource Information
Ella Wood, Federal Manager [email protected] – (202) 401-4963
Angela Kasey, IRG Task [email protected] – (703) 367-1659
IRG Web Address https://extranet.acf.hhs.gov/irgauth/login
18
What’s New with the ICR?
19
Interstate Case Reconciliation (ICR)
• OCSE’s initiative to assist states reconcile interstate cases
• Eight annual case matches conducted to date• Helps states improve/increase/implement:– CSENet– EFT/EDI– QUICK
20
Case Discrepancies the ICR Identifies
• Storing an incorrect case ID for the case in the other state
• Your open interstate case matches to a closed case in the other state
• You have no SSN for the case participant, but the other state has one• You are told if the SSN you receive is verifiable
• SSN you have does not match SSN the other state has• You are told if the SSN you receive is verifiable
• Case cannot be found in other state’s ICR extract file
21
22
ICR-1 – May 2004 ICR-11 – May 2011
32.5% Cases Matched by Case ID
37.2% Corrected Case IDs Provided
30.3% Cases Not Found
85.9% Cases Matched by Case ID
8.5% Cases Not Found
5.6% Corrected Case IDs Provided
Has the ICR Helped the States?
Three New Things to Help More
• Print program• ICR-FCR supplemental match• “Unnecessary Interstate Cases” match
23
Print Program
• For issues that require manual reconciliation• For states with limited programming resources
• State sets up a new CyberFusion node• State asks to receive whichever discrepancy it
wants to address• State prints its own formatted reports– Cases already sorted by county in your state
24
ICR-FCR Supplemental Match
• Looking for all ‘not found’ cases on the FCR• Match will be run in July• Last year discovered that 44% of the ‘not
found’ cases were not even on the FCR
• So what are these cases?• How would correcting/closing these cases
benefit you?
25
“Unnecessary Interstate Cases” Match
• Matching last year’s ICR response file to this year’s response file– To identify cases that had the same issue (e.g.,
open/closed mismatch) 2 years in a row• This match will be available after Labor Day
• How can this match help you triage the workload to address the most important cases first?
26
Questions or Comments
27
ICR Resource Information
Pat Conrad, ICR team [email protected] – (701) 258-6426
ICR Web Addresswww.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cse/newhire/nicr/nicr.htm
28
29
CSENet and QUICK and
Intergovernmental Regulations
CSENet and QUICK
30
• Child Support Enforcement Network (CSENet)– A batch interstate communications tool that conveys
information regarding child support business, locate and case status through the use of transactions
• Query Interstate Cases for Kids (QUICK)– A real-time application for users to view participant
information, financial information, case activities and contact information on a case in another participating state
Intergovernmental Regulations
• Comprehensive regulation (states, tribes and foreign countries)
• Replaces 1988 interstate regulation• Applies only to IV-D programs and clarifies the IV-D
initiating and responding states’ responsibilities• Recognizes electronic communications
advancements• Effective date: January 3, 2011
31
Description of Revised RegulationsCase Closure 303.11(b)(14) Notify the responding agency that its intergovernmental services are no longer
needed.
303.7(d)(10) Notify the initiating agency when a case is closed pursuant to one of the case closure criteria under (d)(9) and 303.11 (b)(12) through (14).
303.7(c)(12) Instruct the responding agency to close its case and stop any withholding order or notice before the initiating state transmits a withholding order or notice to an employer, unless the two states reach another agreement on how to proceed.
303.7(d)(9) Stop the responding state’s income withholding order or notice and close the intergovernmental case within 10 working days of receipt of instructions for case closure from an initiating agency under paragraph (c)(12) of this section, unless the two states reach an alternative agreement.
Interest 303.7(c)(7) Provide annual notice to responding agency regarding amount of interest charges owed
on overdue support on an initiating state order and upon request in an individual case.
32
Initiating State Responsibilities
• Provide annual notification of interest charged on overdue support on an initiating state order
• Within 10 working days, notify responding state of case closure and basis for closure
• Instruct responding state to close its case and stop the wage withholding process before the initiating state begins the wage withholding process
33
Responding State Responsibilities
• Stop wage withholding actions when directed unless an alternative agreement can be reached
• Assess the need for case closure based on receipt of case closure information from the initiating state
34
CSENet Changes
35
• Four New Case Closure Transactions were added– To notify the responding state that the initiating state is
keeping its case open, but no longer needs the responding state’s intergovernmental services (MSC P GSC15)
– To notify the initiating state when a case is closed pursuant to Sec. 303.11(b)(12) through (14) and Sec. 303.7(d)(90) (MSC P GSC16)
CSENet Changes cont.
36
– To notify the responding state that it must stop any income withholding orders or notices to an employer and close the interstate case unless the two states reach an alternative agreement (MSC P GSC17)
– To notify the initiating state when a case is closed pursuant to CFR 303.7(c)(12) since an alternate arrangement was not reached. The responding state closed its corresponding case upon direction from the initiating state. (MSC P GSC18)
CSENet Changes cont.
37
• Two new transactions for arrears and interest– Request another state’s interest information on
an individual interstate case (MSC R GRINT)
– Initiating state provides the responding state with arrears and interest information annually (MSC P GSTAI)
QUICK Changes
38
• Three new case closure reason codes– The initiating state directed closure because it
issued a direct withholding order
– The initiating state advised that its case is closed
– Intergovernmental services are no longer needed by the initiating state
When will these changes take effect?
39
• CSENet changes were implemented:– March 4, 2011
• QUICK changes will be implemented:– June 21, 2011
Questions or Comments
40
Resources
41
• CSENet/QUICK Assistance– Email: [email protected]– Help Desk: 1-800-258-2736
• Release Management Library, OCSE Website:– 11-02 Release Specifications Documentation
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cse/newhire/library/relmgnt/relmgnt.htm