RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN (part I) · 7/4/2004  · /RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM...

Post on 11-May-2020

18 views 0 download

transcript

Helsinki University of Technology

T-72.333 Postgraduate Course in Radio Communications

RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN (part I)

Hafeth HouraniHafeth.hourani@nokia.com

/RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN/ 07.04.2004 hafeth.hourani@nokia.com 2

Outline

Amplifier NonlinearityPre-distortion TechniquesOFDM and PAPRConclusions

/RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN/ 07.04.2004 hafeth.hourani@nokia.com 3

Next . . .

Amplifier NonlinearityPre-distortion TechniquesOFDM and PAPRConclusions

/RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN/ 07.04.2004 hafeth.hourani@nokia.com 4

Amplifier Non-Linearity

Amplifier non-linearity leads toHarmonic DistortionIntermodulation Distortion / Spectral RegrowthCross ModulationSNR DegradationConstellation Deformation

/RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN/ 07.04.2004 hafeth.hourani@nokia.com 5

Harmonic Distortion

Harmonics distortion comes because of the amplifier non-linear transfer characteristics

2 3 41 2 3 4o i i i iv a v a v a v a v= + + + +…

Every nonlinear term (n > 1) generates a new harmonic component at nf1 and nf2

Harmonics can be filtered out without degrading the system performance, since they are far away from the fundamental frequency

/RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN/ 07.04.2004 hafeth.hourani@nokia.com 6

Intermodulation Distortion (1/2)Intermodulation Distortion (IMD) is a result of amplifier nonlinear terms (n > 1)

generates Intermodulation products (IMP) at fim = m f1 - n f2

Distortion order = n + m

In-band components (odd-order)

2fc 3fcfc0 Frequency

Am

plitu

de

2

2

4

3 3

5 5 22 2

4 4 5 53 33 3

3rd IMD (IM3)FundamentalHarmonicsSum IMPsDifference IMPs

Fundamental zone

2nd Harmonic zone

3rd Harmonic zoneDC

zone

IMD ratio

/RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN/ 07.04.2004 hafeth.hourani@nokia.com 7

Intermodulation Distortion (2/2)

IMD is a serious problem in RF systems, especially the third-order IMD (IM3)

At 2 f2 - f1 and 2 f1 - f2

IM3 is the strongest and the most closest to the fundamental frequency componentsIMD products appear regularly on either side of each carrierOdd-order products introduce in-band distortionEven-order products introduce out-of-band distortion

/RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN/ 07.04.2004 hafeth.hourani@nokia.com 8

Cross Modulation

The crossmodulation comes as a result of the amplifier nonlinearity

For the input

The 3rd order term is

New modulation term at fc1

V a

( )( )1 21 2cos(2 ) 1 cos(2 )in c cV V f t V m t f tπ π= + +

( ) ( )( ) 1

2 33 1 2

3 1 2 cos(2 )2o cVV m t m t f tπ= + +

/RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN/ 07.04.2004 hafeth.hourani@nokia.com 9

Spectral Regrowth

Also called “Adjacent Channel Interference”

IM3 energy leaks to the adjacent channelsACLR (Adjacent Channel Leakage Ratio)

/RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN/ 07.04.2004 hafeth.hourani@nokia.com 10

Constellation Deformation

16-QAM signal

Input signal Output signal

/RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN/ 07.04.2004 hafeth.hourani@nokia.com 11

Measuring Nonlinearity

Most common measures of nonlinearity1-dB compression pointIntercept pointsAM/AM and AM/PM conversion

/RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN/ 07.04.2004 hafeth.hourani@nokia.com 12

1-dB Compression Point

The point where the output signal gain has dropped by 1dB from the ideal linear characteristics

Input amplitude

Out

put a

mpl

itude

1 dB drop

Dynamic Range

1-dB compression point

/RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN/ 07.04.2004 hafeth.hourani@nokia.com 13

3rd Order Intercept Point (IIP3)

The interception point between the the extrapolated linear fundamental component and 3rd distortion product

Linear gain

3rd ha

rmon

ic

Fundamental

Input Voltage (peak)

Out

put V

olta

ge (p

eak)

3rd order intercept

point

/RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN/ 07.04.2004 hafeth.hourani@nokia.com 14

Amplifier Dynamic Range

Noise floorGkTeB

/RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN/ 07.04.2004 hafeth.hourani@nokia.com 15

Distortion in Power Amplifiers

There are two reasons for power amplifiers distortionDistortion due to the amplifier nonlinear characteristics

Small signal distortion

Distortion due to the amplifier saturationLarge signal distortion

The impact of the large-signal-distortion is more sever than that of small-signal-distortion

/RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN/ 07.04.2004 hafeth.hourani@nokia.com 16

Amplifier Back-Off

Input Back-Off (IBO)

Output Back-Off (OBO)

,

,

10 log sat in

avg in

PIBO

P

=

,

,

10 log sat out

avg out

POBO

P

=

/RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN/ 07.04.2004 hafeth.hourani@nokia.com 17

Next . . .

Amplifier NonlinearityOFDM and PAPRPre-distortion TechniquesConclusions

/RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN/ 07.04.2004 hafeth.hourani@nokia.com 18

OFDM Problems

There are some obstacles when using OFDM

High sensitivity to the frequency errors

Intercarrier Interference (ICI) between the subcarriers

OFDM signal exhibits very high Peak to Average Power Ratio (PAPR)

/RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN/ 07.04.2004 hafeth.hourani@nokia.com 19

PAPR of OFDM Signals

The complex envelope of the OFDM signal, over T second interval is given by

1

0( ) ( ), 0

N

c n nn

S t A w t t Tϕ−

=

= > >∑Where

is the carrier amplitude, andis the data vector

And the orthogonal carriers are

where

cAnw

2( ) nj f tn t e πϕ =

1 1( )2n

Nf t nT

− = −

/RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN/ 07.04.2004 hafeth.hourani@nokia.com 20

PAPR Definition

The PAPR is defined as ( )( )2

2

0

max ( )

1 ( )

tNT

s

S tPAPR S t

E S t dtNT

=

/RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN/ 07.04.2004 hafeth.hourani@nokia.com 21

Quantifying PAPR

As N becomes larger, the imaginary and real parts of S(t) becomes Gaussian distributed (central limit theory)

The amplitude of PAPR has a Rayleigh distribution, with zero mean and variance N times of one complex sinusoid

Assuming mutually uncorrelated symbols, the CDF of PAPR per OFDM symbol is given by

{ } ( )( )Pr 1 1N

PAPR eγγ> = − −

/RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN/ 07.04.2004 hafeth.hourani@nokia.com 22

PAPR Properties

From the pervious two slides, we can conclude the following PAPR properties

PAPR results from the superposition of large number of subcarriersThe PAPR follows the Rayleigh distributionThe large peaks do not occur very often

/RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN/ 07.04.2004 hafeth.hourani@nokia.com 23

Next . . .

Amplifier NonlinearityOFDM and PAPRPre-distortion TechniquesConclusions

/RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN/ 07.04.2004 hafeth.hourani@nokia.com 24

Predistortion Techniques

Attempts to compensate for the nonlinear distortions by modifying the input signal characteristics

These modifications can be either non-adaptive or adaptive

/RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN/ 07.04.2004 hafeth.hourani@nokia.com 25

Amplitude Clipping

Limits the peak envelope of the input signal to a predefined value

The amplitude clipping introduces additional distortion, which can be viewed as a clipping noise

In-band noise for Nyquist sampled signalsOut-of-band noise for oversampled signals

arg( )

,( )

,j x

x x AL x

Ae x A ≤= >

/RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN/ 07.04.2004 hafeth.hourani@nokia.com 26

Clipping Ratio

Clipping Ratio (CR) The ratio of peak value (A) to the RMS value of the OFDM signal

PSD

(dB

)

/RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN/ 07.04.2004 hafeth.hourani@nokia.com 27

Clipping Noise

Clipped and Filtered OFDM signals

/RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN/ 07.04.2004 hafeth.hourani@nokia.com 28

Next . . .

Amplifier NonlinearityOFDM and PAPRPre-distortion TechniquesConclusions

/RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN/ 07.04.2004 hafeth.hourani@nokia.com 29

Conclusions

Clipping is the simplest and most common non-adaptive predistortion techniqueAlthough clipping helps limits the peak amplitude of the input signal, it also introduces an additional noise source called clipping noiseClipping noise can greatly degrade the BER performance of the system

/RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN/ 07.04.2004 hafeth.hourani@nokia.com 30

Thank You!

/RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN/ 07.04.2004 hafeth.hourani@nokia.com 31

References

J. Heiskala and J. Terry, “OFDM Wireless LAN: A Theoretical and Practical Guide”, SAM Publishing, 2001Peter B. Kenington, “High Linearity RF Amplifier Design”, Artech House, 2002

/RF Distortion Analysis for OFDM WLAN/ 07.04.2004 hafeth.hourani@nokia.com 32

Exercise

Clipping is one method to overcome the PAPR in OFDM. List three other methods, and give a two lines description for each.

Hint.There are around 9 popular PAPR reduction methods. You may google the internet with “PAPR Reduction”