November 2016
www.pwc.com.au
2016 Australian and New Zealand Working Capital Survey
1 | PwC
ForewordWelcome to PwC’s 2016 Working Capital Survey of Australian and NZ companies. Working capital is the life blood of every company and is a barometer for how freely cash flows. In efficiently run businesses, cash runs freely; in others, cash gets trapped in working capital, restricting the company’s ability to grow. In this year’s Australian & NZ Working Capital Survey, we look at how the largest 458 companies on the ASX have performed and what the key trends are around the globe and across sectors. We are working with many companies to help them optimise their working capital and achieve sustainable performance improvements. This study shows that working capital continues to present a significant opportunity for releasing cash and should therefore receive special attention as companies seek to take full advantage of the global economic upturn.
Derrick VickersPartner, National Business Recovery Services LeaderPwC Australia
2016 Australian and New Zealand Working Capital Survey | 2
Executive summary
Working capital improvement is the key to reducing financial risk & fuelling growth for Australian & NZ companies
Jonas Schofer, Director Working Capital Management
While working capital performance has continued to improve, our latest survey shows that Australian companies still lag behind 2011 levels. This creates a $119b cash opportunity from improvements in working capital processes. Compared to this untapped potential, we can see that the overall liquidity in the region seems to have been mostly funded by debt from capital markets. Driven by record low interest rates, companies have turned towards financing solutions instead of unlocking the internally trapped cash. This has led to an increase in the credit risk in the market and can pose a risk for ASX share values compared to international competitors. While the ability to generate cash from profits has increased, the rate of investment in expansion and growth has slowed to record lows.
At the same time, companies will have to prepare for increased turbulence; the low interest environment is likely to end eventually, posing a risk from escalated funding costs of unprecedented levels. The US presidential election result is likely to induce additional turbulence into the global economies that Australian and NZ companies are reliant upon as export markets.
However, it’s not all doom and gloom: the top 458 ASX companies have improved their working capital performance for a second year in a row. Yet, they still fall short of demonstrated 2011 levels. The improvement in working capital stems from the asset side of the balance sheet, particularly from enhancements in inventories management. This was partially offset by more relaxed payable behaviour – likely caused through an increase in settlement discounts and stricter collection activities of suppliers.
$119bn additional liquidity could be released – and our survey shows a direct relationship between working capital performance and cost efficiency.
Companies with lower days sales outstanding (DSO) and higher days payable outstanding (DPO) show a considerably better cost base as percentage of revenue, proving the claim that working capital performance is a measure of a company’s process capability and quality.
No matter what financing is available in the market, companies could find there are extensive cash reserves tied up in their own balance sheets. Tapping into this will prove to be the cheapest source of cash available.
3 | PwC
Cost of finance at top quartile firms
0.53%
Working capital performance drives link to efficiency Analysis of accounts receivables performance shows that organisations with higher days sales outstanding typically spend one and a half times as much on their accounts receivable processes, and deploy twice as many people to manage them.
Analysis of accounts payables performance shows the cost and full time employee gap is also evident in companies with low or high DPO. However, the cost and headcount difference for these organisations is less extreme and shows the opposite picture to receivables. Whilst higher DPO are more desirable, some organisations may not achieve this by implementing strategies to optimise terms and make payments efficiently. Rather this may be achieved through inefficient processes, involving manual approvals, error, rework and simply paying late after the due date.
Top performing companies have a significantly lower finance cost base
Companies are continuing to drive down the overall cost of their capital finance. Whilst finance will always be required for significant investment, the fact that top quartile costs are 40 per cent lower than average performers indicates that leading organisations have managed finance costs more efficiently through a variety of methods, including automation, shared services and more efficient use of capacity.
11 140.059% 0.079%
Median FTEsper $ billion
Median FTEsper $ billion
Median Cost as % of revenue
Median Cost as % of revenue
son
Median FTEsper $ billion
DSO DPO
Companies with low DSO Companies with high DSO Companies with high DPO Companies with low DPO
13 260.083% 0.127%
Median FTEsper $ billion
Median FTEsper $ billion
Median Cost as % of revenue
Median Cost as % of revenue
Source: PwC Global Working Capital Survey
Cost of finance, as a percentage of revenue, at typical firms
0.89%
2016 Australian and New Zealand Working Capital Survey | 4
Working capital performance continues to vary across the globe
Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence
Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence
Over the last decade, E7 nations’ working capital days have increased from 40 days in 2006 to 44 days in 2015 by 11 per cent, whilst the G7 nations’ performance has remained stable.
While Australian companies have improved for the second year in a row, performance levels have not reached 2011 levels, and the competition does not sleep.
In 2015, both India and Japan experienced significant improvements in working capital performance. In particular, India’s improvement of seven days in 2015 is notable, especially when compared to their ten year average performance of 46 days.
This compares to Japan’s improvement, which is a return to their average performance following 2014’s significant deterioration.
Africa’s 2015 performance has deteriorated year-on-year, it is now in line with the region’s 10 year average. However, it is worth noting that working capital in Africa has shown a large deterioration in performance over the last 10 years as demonstrated by a performance of 89 days and 12 days in 2009 and 2013 respectively.
Germany and the USA are the most stable regions in our review, with an average performance of 48 days and 34 days respectively and a standard deviation of three and one days respectively.
E7 vs. G7 NWC days performance
NWC days change 2015 2014 by country
NWC 2015NWC 2015NWC 2006
39.86 days
44.11 days 41.35
days41.19
daysE7
G7
NWC 2006
25
20
15
10
5
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
Ind
ia
Jap
an
Uni
ted
Kin
gd
om
Bra
zil
Arg
entin
a
Ind
ia
Aus
tral
ia
Ger
man
y
Cen
tral
& S
out
h A
mer
icas
Fra
nce
Mex
ico
So
uth
Afr
ica
Rus
sia
Mid
dle
Eas
t
Res
t o
f A
sia
Chi
na
Res
t o
f E
uro
pe
Ital
y
Can
ada
Ind
one
sia
So
uthe
ast
Asi
a
Uni
ted
Sta
tes
So
uth
Ko
rea
Afr
ica
Turk
ey
Percentage
Significant improvements in working capital during 2015 for the likes of India and Japan, highlight how quickly the benefits of working capital can be realised.
5 | PwC
Working capital performance has continued to improve however Australian and NZ companies still lag behind 2011 levels and have a $119b cash opportunity
Days working capital Working capital is a fundamental component of most companies’ operations but the management thereof is often overlooked resulting in early warning signs not being identified and/or opportunities being missed. Efficient management of working capital within Australian and NZ companies can enable these companies to better ride the natural movements in an economy currently underpinned by a volatile commodities market. The region faces both challenging times ahead as we pivot away from the mining boom towards agriculture and services while contending with potential instability from China.
In the last two years we have seen an overall reduction in days of working capital indicating continued focus on tightening and improving processes. Despite this improvement – working capital performance still exceeds the levels achieved during 2011 – illustrating that significant opportunities currently exist to release cash from one of the cheapest sources available.
Australian and NZ companies can trigger a $119 billion cash release if the underperforming Australian companies would achieve just average performance and the better performing achieved only upper quartile performance.
45
47
48
50 49
47
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Day
s
2016 Australian and New Zealand Working Capital Survey | 6
Basis of calculations and limitationsBasis of calculations
This study provides a view of Australia’s working capital performance and is based on the research of the largest 458 listed companies on the ASX. The Financial Services, Banks, Real Estate and Insurance sectors are excluded.
Metric Basis of calculation
NWC % (Net working capital %) NWC % measures working capital requirements relative to the size of the company.
(Accounts Receivable + Inventories – Accounts Payable)/Sales
DSO (Days Sales Outstanding) DSO is a measure of the average number of days that a company takes to collect cash after the sale of goods or services have been delivered.
Accounts Receivable/ Sales x 365
DIO (Days Inventories On-hand)
DIO gives an idea of how long it takes for a company to convert its inventory into sales. Generally, the lower (shorter) the DIO, the better.
Inventories/Cost of Goods Sold x 365
DPO (Days Payables Outstanding)
DPO is an indicator of how long a company takes to pay its trade creditors.
Accounts Payable/Cost of Goods Sold x 365
CCE (Cash Conversion Efficiency)
CCE is an indicator of how efficiently a company is able to convert profits into cash.
Cash Flow from Operations/EBITDA
Investment Rate Investment Rate measures the amount of investment relative to the revenues of a company.
Capital Expenditure/Sales
ROC (Return on Capital) ROC is an indicator of profits as a proportion of a company’s capital.
EBIT x (1 – tax)/Average Total Capital
EBITDA Margin (Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation)
EBITDA Margin is an indicator of a company’s profitability level as a proportion of its revenue.
EBITDA/Sales
Cost of Debt Cost of Debt is the effective rate that a company pays on its debt.
Interest Expense/Average Total Debt
7 | PwC
The improvement in working capital stems from the asset side of the balance sheet, particularly from enhancements in inventories management – however this was partially offset by quicker payment behaviour.
Days sales outstanding Days inventories on-hand Days payables outstanding
Receivables performance, measured in days sales outstanding, have continued the steady decline over the past 6 years to record low levels.
This could be as a result of continued focus on overdue reduction programmes which has traditionally been deemed – together with delayed payments – as the easiest and safest ways to improve working capital.
The significant improvement in inventories, measured as days inventories on-hand, has decreased by five days since 2014. This is deemed to be the primary driver of the improved working capital performance over the past two years.
The biggest improvement in inventory performance came from consumer services and consumer durables and apparel which decreased average days by 28 per cent – it is not unreasonable to assume that management’s continued focus on cost management has been a primary contributor to these improvements.
Days payables outstanding, which is used to monitor payables performance, has continued to decline and has reached a record low since 2011.
The continued deterioration of payable terms could be indicative that management have pursued cost cutting initiatives such as early settlement discounts, which could potentially be to the detriment of its working capital cycle.
This highlights that various untapped opportunities exist in this space.
46 46
44 44
45
43
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Day
s
54
58 57
61
59
56
53
55
57
59
61
63
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Day
s
61 59
53 53 54
49
48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Day
s
2016 Australian and New Zealand Working Capital Survey | 8
“Automobiles and Component” and “Telecommunication Services” have been the primary industries driving the improvement in working capital performances
(Improvement)/Deterioration in days working capital
While the majority of industries have been able to improve their average days working capital from FY15 to FY16, “Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology and Life Sciences” have seen a significant deterioration in its working capital driven primarily by an increase in inventory days as well as reduction in creditor days.
(19)
(11) (7) (6) (6) (5) (4) (4) (4) (3) (3)
(1) (0)
0 1 2 5
(25)
(20)
(15)
(10)
(5)
5
10
Day
s
Auto
mob
iles
and
Com
pone
nts
Tele
com
mun
icat
ion
Ser
vice
s
Ener
gy
Con
sum
er D
urab
les
and
App
arel
Tech
nolo
gy H
ardw
are
and
Equ
ipm
ent
Softw
are
and
Ser
vice
s
Hea
lthca
re E
quip
men
t a
nd S
ervi
ces
Reta
iling
Com
mer
cial
and
Pro
fess
iona
l S
ervi
ces
Cap
ital G
oods
Mat
eria
ls
Tran
spor
tatio
n
Con
sum
er S
ervi
ces
Util
ities
Food
, Bev
erag
e a
nd T
obac
co
Med
ia
Phar
mac
eutic
als,
Bio
tech
nolo
gy a
nd L
ife S
cien
ces
0
9 | PwC
The overall liquidity in the Australian & NZ market has been funded by debt – resulting in an increase in the credit risk in the market
Cash-in-hand ($ billions) Net Debt ($ billions)
While cash available to companies continued to increase post 2014, Net Debt balances have reached record levels in 2016. This illustrates that the availability of borrowed cash in capital markets is increasing the risk companies will face when interest rates eventually rise.
Given the current economic environment where interest rates are low, consumer confidence is
high applying upward pressure on inflation. The Australian Reserve Bank has kept interest rates at record lows; considering these market indicators, it is only a matter of time before interest rates are increased.
Assuming an increase in the prime interest rate of just 25 basis points and given the current net debt levels – this would result in additional finance costs of circa
$455 million which would by applied to companies’ bottom line.
This additional risk taken on by Australian & New Zealand companies would result in foreign investors requiring additional and higher returns from Australian companies, which if not achieved could have a negative impact on the overall ASX.
0
105
148 164
149
176 181
50
100
150
200
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
46 42 42
53
46 49
20
0
40
60
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
2016 Australian and New Zealand Working Capital Survey | 10
While the ability to generate cash from profits has increased, the rate of investment in expansion and growth has slowed to record lows
Cash conversion efficiency Investment rate
The steady increase in the cash conversion efficiency illustrates companies’ improved ability to convert profits into cash – which in turn has a positive impact on liquidity.
However the slow down in the overall investment rate since 2011 illustrates that companies are investing a smaller portion of cash generated in expansion and growth. This decrease is a result of both decreases in the nominal
value of investments during the year as well as slight increases in revenue.
Together with the survey results regarding liquidity and capital balances raises concerns over the raising decisions of companies. It would seem that corporates are raising debt and therefore increasing their overall risk profile – not to fund expansion and growth but to increase their liquidity.
This seemingly cosmetic measure applied by management to improve balance sheets, could have a detrimental impact on the overall markets if the companies are unable to reward foreign investors for the additional risk of higher debt levels.
9% 9%
8%
6% 6% 6%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Day
s 72%
69%
71% 72%
78% 77%
64%
68%
72%
76%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 D
ays
$119bn additional liquidity could be released if working capital processes were improved*
Industries Net Working Capital days
Days of working capital: industry performers
111 97
87 85 82
64
47 47 46 43 39 39 35 32 30 19
4 20
0
40
60
80
100
120
Auto
mob
iles
and
Com
pone
nts
Food
, Bev
erag
e a
nd T
obac
co
Con
sum
er D
urab
les
and
App
arel
Tech
nolo
gy H
ardw
are
and
Equ
ipm
ent
Phar
mac
eutic
als,
Bio
tech
nolo
gy a
nd L
ife S
cien
ces
Cap
ital G
oods
Ener
gy
Con
sum
er S
ervi
ces
Hea
lthca
re E
quip
men
t a
nd S
ervi
ces
Softw
are
and
Ser
vice
s
Mat
eria
ls
Reta
iling
Com
mer
cial
and
Pro
fess
iona
l S
ervi
ces
Util
ities
Med
ia
Tran
spor
tatio
n
Tele
com
mun
icat
ion
Ser
vice
s
0
111 97 87 85 82 64 47 47 46 43 39 39 35 32 30 19 4 111
23 37 65
19 31 4 (25) (4) 12 1 5 5 6 (9) (15) (18)
112
182 141
110 157
97 105
196
106 79 95 79 63 58 63 44 23
(50)
50 100 150 200 250
Auto
mob
iles
and
Com
pone
nts
Food
, Bev
erag
e a
nd T
obac
co
Con
sum
er D
urab
les
and
App
arel
Tech
nolo
gy H
ardw
are
and
Equ
ipm
ent
Phar
mac
eutic
als,
Bio
tech
nolo
gy a
nd L
ife S
cien
ces
Cap
ital G
oods
Ener
gy
Con
sum
er S
ervi
ces
Hea
lthca
re E
quip
men
t a
nd S
ervi
ces
Softw
are
and
Ser
vice
s
Mat
eria
ls
Reta
iling
Com
mer
cial
and
Pro
fess
iona
l S
ervi
ces
Util
ities
Med
ia
Tran
spor
tatio
n
Tele
com
mun
icat
ion
Ser
vice
s
Industry average Top performers Bottom performers
* To the industries’ average and the companies reaching their industries’ average improves to the top performers
11 | PwC
2016 Australian and New Zealand Working Capital Survey | 12
“Consumer Services” is the biggest outlier in the market with the longest DSO by far
Days sales outstanding: industry performers
45
23 23
47
28
42
12 5 10
36
1 1
22 29
42
13 14
51 53 50 58
53 57
44 53
45
61
25
15
51
38
60
32 40
56
85
65 68 76 74
84
134
76
90
52
40
72
50
74
52 61
20 0
0
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Top performers Bottom performers Industry average
Auto
mob
iles
and
Com
pone
nts
Food
, Bev
erag
e a
nd T
obac
co
Con
sum
er D
urab
les
and
App
arel
Tech
nolo
gy H
ardw
are
and
Equ
ipm
ent
Phar
mac
eutic
als,
Bio
tech
nolo
gy a
nd L
ife S
cien
ces
Cap
ital G
oods
Ener
gy
Con
sum
er S
ervi
ces
Hea
lthca
re E
quip
men
t a
nd S
ervi
ces
Softw
are
and
Ser
vice
s
Mat
eria
ls
Reta
iling
Com
mer
cial
and
Pro
fess
iona
l S
ervi
ces
Util
ities
Med
ia
Tran
spor
tatio
n
Tele
com
mun
icat
ion
Ser
vice
s
13 | PwC
The variance between top inventory managing companies and bottom ranked companies is large indicating a significant advantage for the top companies
Days inventory on-hand
127
66
30
60 42
7 10 1
10 2
26
43
1 13
5 2 1
158
133
111 100
130
66
43 53
94
128
74
106
22
54
13 20 8
189 205
166
143
222
126
74
180 195
102
133
207
59
79
24 34
15
50
100
150
200
250
Auto
mob
iles
and
Com
pone
nts
Food
, Bev
erag
e a
nd T
obac
co
Con
sum
er D
urab
les
and
App
arel
Tech
nolo
gy H
ardw
are
and
Equ
ipm
ent
Phar
mac
eutic
als,
Bio
tech
nolo
gy a
nd L
ife S
cien
ces
Cap
ital G
oods
Ener
gy
Con
sum
er S
ervi
ces
Hea
lthca
re E
quip
men
t a
nd S
ervi
ces
Softw
are
and
Ser
vice
s
Mat
eria
ls
Reta
iling
Com
mer
cial
and
Pro
fess
iona
l S
ervi
ces
Util
ities
Med
ia
Tran
spor
tatio
n
Tele
com
mun
icat
ion
Ser
vice
s
0
Top performers Bottom performers Industry average
2016 Australian and New Zealand Working Capital Survey | 14
The analysis of payables performance illustrates that some companies within industries are able to gain better terms with creditors through effective processes and understanding the value of cash
Days payables outstanding: industry performers
54
96
74 80
121
76 68
91
112
149
119
92 89
126
80
63
87
52 58
47 57
72
46 37
48 53 62
55 50 52
57 57
42
62
49
17 18
41
26 19
10 17 14
9 15
25 14 -
17 12
36 20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Auto
mob
iles
and
Com
pone
nts
Food
, Bev
erag
e a
nd T
obac
co
Con
sum
er D
urab
les
and
App
arel
Tech
nolo
gy H
ardw
are
and
Equ
ipm
ent
Phar
mac
eutic
als,
Bio
tech
nolo
gy a
nd L
ife S
cien
ces
Cap
ital G
oods
Ener
gy
Con
sum
er S
ervi
ces
Hea
lthca
re E
quip
men
t a
nd S
ervi
ces
Softw
are
and
Ser
vice
s
Mat
eria
ls
Reta
iling
Com
mer
cial
and
Pro
fess
iona
l S
ervi
ces
Util
ities
Med
ia
Tran
spor
tatio
n
Tele
com
mun
icat
ion
Ser
vice
s
0
Top performers Bottom performers Industry average
15 | PwC
How can we support you
Typical Results our Clients Experience:
15-30% Reduction in Days Sales Outstanding, reduced number of disputes, reduced margin erosion
10-25% Reduction in Days Inventory on-hand at improved service levels & leadtimes
30-90% Increase in Days Payables Outstanding, reduced direct & indirect spend, better transparency
Change mindsets and create a cash culture
Typical Improvement Journey for our Clients Why PwC is best suited to support your Executive Agenda
1.
2.
3.
4.
Complete a working capital benchmarking exercise to compare performance against peers and identify potential improvement opportunities.
Perform a diagnostic review to identify ‘quick wins’ and longer-term working capital improvement opportunities.
Develop detailed action plans for implementation to generate cash and make sustainable improvements.
Assist the realisation of sustainable working capital reduction by implementing robust, efficient and collaborative processes.
Australian team has delivered more than 40 dedicated working capital engagements, 100’s in the global network
We do WCM, and nothing else
Part of global WCM specialist team with 100’s of successful engagements and matter and industry experts
We are not resprayed accountants, we are operationally experienced managers
We make change stick
We deliver results that are fast and measurable
We deliver significant returns: Typical cash results range from 5-10% of revenue
Our approach adapts to clients’ needs: Performing, Stressed or Distressed
PwC | 2016 Australian and New Zealand Working Capital Survey | 15
2016 Australian and New Zealand Working Capital Survey | 18
PwC contacts
Troy Porter Partner
+61 (2) 8266 7516 [email protected]
Michael Fung Partner
+61 (3) 8603 1147 [email protected]
Derrick Vickers Partner
+61 (7) 3257 5141 [email protected]
Kate Warwick Partner
+61 (3) 8603 3289 [email protected]
Greg Hall Partner
+61 (2) 8266 7138 [email protected]
Sam Marsden Partner
+61 (8) 9238 3290 [email protected]
Jonas Schofer Director
+61 (2) 8266 4782 [email protected]
PwC | 2016 Australian and New Zealand Working Capital Survey | i
© 2016 PricewaterhouseCoopers. All rights reserved. PwC refers to the Australian member firm, and may sometimes refer to the PwC network. Each member firm is a separate legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details.
At PwC Australia our purpose is to build trust in society and solve important problems. We’re a network of firms in 157 countries with more than 223,000 people who are committed to delivering quality in assurance, advisory and tax services. Find out more and tell us what matters to you by visiting us at www.pwc.com.au
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.
127044756