+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land-Use: Combining two sectors of the IPCC 1996 Guidelines Leandro...

Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land-Use: Combining two sectors of the IPCC 1996 Guidelines Leandro...

Date post: 18-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: derek-chandler
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
21
Agriculture, Forestry and O ther Land-Use: Combining tw o sectors of the IPCC 1996 Guidelines Leandro Buendia Technical Support Unit – IPCC NGGIP
Transcript

Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land-Use: Combining two sectors of the IP

CC 1996 Guidelines

Leandro BuendiaTechnical Support Unit – IPCC NGGIP

Outline

Introduction of the 2 Sectors

Challenges to Integration

Approach to Integration

Progress so far…

Bases for 2006 Guidelines

Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines (1996GL) GPG2000 GPG for LULUCF Plus:

Experience in the use of GLs and GPGs New scientific and technological development

Agriculture Sector in 1996GL and GPG2000

1. CH4 Emissions from Enteric Fermentation

2. CH4 and N2O Emissions from Manure Management

3. CH4 Emissions from Rice Cultivation

4. GHG Emissions from Savanna and Agricultural Burning

5. N2O Emissions from Agricultural Soils

LUCF Sector in 1996GL

1. Changes in Forest and Other Woody Biomass Stocks

2. Forest and Grassland Conversion

3. Abandonment of Managed Lands

4. CO2 Emissions and Removals from Soils

5. Other

LULUCF-GPG1. Forest Land

2. Cropland

3. Grassland

4. Wetlands

5. Settlements

6. Other Land

1996GL(3 Vols.)

GPG2000

LULUCF-GPG

2006GL

Challenge to Integration…

- new development- experience

Challenges to Integration

Present the methodological guidance in a more step-by-step “cookbook” structure;

Avoid repetition of information among the 1996GL, GPG2000, and LULUCF-GPG;

Avoid double counting or omissions and to be consistent with the treatment of categories (e.g. N2O from soils, GHG from biomass burning, etc.)

Provide default values for all Tier 1 variables wherever possible;

Re-evaluate and improve the current default emission factors.

Approach to Integration to be based on the IPCC approved TOC

to merge the materials from the 1996Guidelines, GPG2000 and GPG-LULUCF;

to use the structure consistent with the GPG-LULUCF (i.e. by land-use category);

to integrate Agriculture into this new framework to resolve inconsistencies and avoid double counting;

to be consistent with existing inventory data;

to update data, methods and emission factors where feasible.

Progress so far…

Volume 4: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU) 4.1 Overview and cross-cutting issues4.2 Consistent Representation of Lands4.3 Agriculture

- Cropland and Grassland Remaining Cropland and Grassland- Land Converted to Cropland- Land Converted to Grassland- Livestock

4.4 Forest lands- Forest land remaining forest land- Land converted to forest land

4.5 Wetlands- Peatlands- Flooded lands

4.6 Settlements- Settlements remaining settlements- Land converted to settlements

4.7 Other land4.8 Other

- HWP (taking into consideration any decision of the COP on this matter)

69 Experts/Authors for AFOLU(3 CLAs; 66 LAs)

Biomass (23)

Soils (17)

Livestock (9)

Wetlands (11)

Representation (4)

HWP(5)

CLAs Meeting b/b with Cross-Cutting Issue Meeting, Oslo (May 2004)

Elaborated the TOC …4.1 Overview and cross-cutting issues4.2 Consistent Representation of Lands/Management Sys

tems4.3 Summary of the Methodologies (equations for pools

and gases)4.4 Agriculture4.5 Forest lands4.6 Wetlands4.7 Settlements4.8 Other land4.9 Other

4.4 Agriculture

4.4.1 Cropland and Grassland Remaining Cropland and Grassland

4.4.2 Land Converted to Cropland

4.4.3 Land Converted to Grassland

4.4.4 Livestock

4.4.1 Cropland Remaining Cropland 4.4.1.1 Biomass (above- and belowground biomass)

- Change in carbon stocks in- Methodological Issues- Uncertainty Assessment

4.4.1.2 Dead organic Matter (litter and deadwood)- Change in carbon stocks

4.4.1.3 Soils - Change in carbon stocks (mineral, organic, liming)- CH4 from rice cultivation- Direct N2O from soils- Indirect N2O from soils

4.4.1.4 Non-CO2 GHG emissions (CO, CH4, N2O, NOx)- burning of biomass/residues

- Choice of Method- Choice of E/R Factor- Choice of Activity Data

…and similar elaboration was applied to other sections 4.4 Agriculture

- Cropland and Grassland Remaining Cropland and Grassland- Land Converted to Cropland- Land Converted to Grassland- Livestock

4.5 Forest lands- Forest land remaining forest land- Land converted to forest land

4.6 Wetlands- Peatlands- Flooded lands

4.7 Settlements- Settlements remaining settlements- Land converted to settlements

4.8 Other land4.9 Other

AFOLU Authors/Expert Meeting, Mauritius (June 2004)

General Guidance to Authors of the 2006GL (Oslo output)

to guide authors in writing contributions to the 2006GL

to ensure a consistent and coherent approach across all the volumes and to promote common terms used

Some major decisions in Mauritius to have a generalized framework to describe C stock

changes, disturbance impact and non-CO2 emissions for consistent treatment of C stock and transfers among biomass, DOM and soil

to develop consistent terminology and symbols for pools and transfers

to check GPG equations for consistent use of terminology and completeness

to review additional literatures on EF readjust some default EFs, scaling factors

to provide guidelines on using additional activity data (water management, organic amendments, climate zone, soil type)

Some major decisions in Mauritius

to provide uncertainty levels for default EFs and other default parameters

to provide QA/QC methodology to ensure completeness of reported emission related to N sources

to review and revise decision trees to reflect all available options

to do proper accounting for applied nitrogen to soils from manure management systems

Some major decisions in Mauritius to enhance consistency in representation of land areas

using a common set of classifications of land into areas that match default factors and where possible available global data

to provide guidance on matching area estimates to default factors in the methodological guidance

to encourage transparent reporting through (or to) classification systems, relevant at Tiers 2 and 3

HWP group did not meet (to take into consideration any decision of the COP on this matter); to meet in November 2004

Workplan for First-order Draft

Mauritius – identified tasks and assignments

June-Oct 15 – Work by LAs & CLAs to draft report

Oct 15-Nov 15 – Consolidation/exchange of draft

Nov 15-Dec 1 – Drafts finalized by CLAs

November –incorporation of HWP section

Dec 1 – 0+ draft to TSU - tech. editing/formatting

Jan 05 – Consolidation meeting for 1o draft

Mar 05 – Final 1o draft for expert review


Recommended