August 7, 2014August 7, 2014Lync Online PresentationLync Online Presentation

12:00pm CST12:00pm CST

2

Opening RemarksOpening Remarks

Omar CollierOmar CollierContracting OfficerContracting Officer

These slides are not to be interpreted as a comprehensive description of the procurement strategy or requirements in the Draft RFP

To the extent there are any inconsistencies between this briefing and any future RFP, the RFP will govern

3

Purpose of Pre-Solicitation ConferencePurpose of Pre-Solicitation Conference

The purpose of this Pre-Solicitation Conference is to help industry understand the Government’s requirements

Questions:– Real-time questions will be entertained during the conference by

sending in a “chat”. Also, questions submitted electronically will be answered after a brief break. These questions and responses will be posted to the CRS2 procurement website and the posted response will be considered official responses. If a difference exists between verbal and written responses to questions, the written responses shall govern. If there are questions that we need more time to respond to, they will be posted to the CRS2 website at a later time.

– The deadline for submitting questions prior to release of the Final RFP is August 8, 2014. You will have an opportunity to submit questions after the Final RFP is released.

4

Topic Presenter

Welcome Delene Sedillo, Associate Director, JSC Office of Procurement

Opening Remarks Omar Collier, Contracting Officer

Organization, Vision, and Objectives Marybeth Edeen, Board Chair

Orientation and Procurement Overview Omar Collier

Section I Capabilities Marybeth Edeen

Section II Topics Omar Collier

SOW, Attachments, and DRDs Marybeth Edeen

Instructions and Evaluation Overview Marybeth Edeen/David Wilson

Pricing David Wilson

Additional Information Omar Collier

Break and Question Submissions

Q&A, Schedule, and Closing Remarks

5

6

Organization, Vision, and ObjectivesOrganization, Vision, and Objectives

Program Vision◦ A world renowned laboratory in space enabling discoveries in

science and technology that benefit life on Earth and exploration of the universe.

Program Mission◦ To advance science and technology research, expand human

knowledge, inspire and educate the next generation, foster the commercial development of space and demonstrate capabilities to enable future exploration missions beyond low Earth orbit.

7

Commercial Resupply Services are critical to the execution of the ISS Program to provide crew supplies and research payloads to the ISS◦ MUST fly on-time◦ MUST provide flexibility for cargo manifesting◦ MUST be reliable

Combination of upmass, volume and number of flights per year is critical to the success of the ISS program

Research requirements to perform high quality science and technology development drive unique capabilities for the resupply service vehicles◦ These are critical for ISS to be a platform for discovery that will

improve life on Earth and allow us to explore beyond low Earth orbit External dependencies required to provide the service can limit the

robustness of a solution ◦ Political, social, economic or environmental impacts or events that

constrain the ability to meet these needs will be carefully evaluated for risk reduction approaches

8

Goal is to have a full and open competition that provides the most complete set of services for minimum cost◦ Inclusion of ISS Integration Certification as a separate CLIN and separate

payable milestones◦ Want to limit non-recurring engineering costs

Intent of the RFP is to define the requirements that the program needs at an ~85-90% level◦ Some highly desired capabilities were put as “should” statements instead

of “shall” statements not because we do not want them but because we are not sure we can afford them

◦ Special capabilities outside of an offeror’s mission defined capabilities would be handled on a case-by-case basis and would be negotiated as a special task when the need arises

9

ISS Flight PlanISS Flight PlanFlight Planning Integration Panel (FPIP)Flight Planning Integration Panel (FPIP)

(For Reference Only)(For Reference Only)

For current baseline refer to SSP 54100 Multi-Increment Planning Document (MIPD)

DC1 ↓

ISS Flight PlanISS Flight PlanFlight Planning Integration Panel (FPIP)Flight Planning Integration Panel (FPIP)

(For Reference Only)(For Reference Only)

For current baseline refer to SSP 54100 Multi-Increment Planning Document (MIPD)

12

Orientation and Procurement Orientation and Procurement OverviewOverview

Omar CollierOmar CollierContracting OfficerContracting Officer

Source Selection Authority −William Gerstenmaier, Associate Administrator for the Human

Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate

Acquisition Team− Marybeth Edeen, Board Chair− Omar Collier, Contracting Officer − Sam Krenek− Daniel Londa− Doug Rarick

13

Contracting Officer: Omar K. Collieromar.k.collier@nasa.gov 281.483.0004

Contracting Officer:Aneesah K. VaughnAneesah.k.vaughn@nasa.gov 281.244.5329

CRS2 web address: http://procurement.jsc.nasa.gov/crs2/ − Click on the “Anonymous Questions to the Contracting Officer and Feedback”

link to submit a question− This link will remain active until the release of the Final RFP; afterwards

communication will be in accordance with clause VI.A.17 COMMUNICATIONS REGARDING THIS SOLICITATION

14

Ombudsman (NFS 1852.215-84): “…before consulting with an ombudsman, interested parties must first address their concerns, issues, disagreements, and/or recommendations to the Contracting Officer for resolution … If resolution cannot be made by the Contracting Officer, interested parties may contact the installation ombudsman …”

JSC ombudsman information Perri E. Foxperri.e.fox@nasa.gov NASA Johnson Space Center

2101 NASA Parkway/Mail Code:ACPhone: (281) 358-0445

Houston, TX 77058

Installation ombudsman information may be found at:http://prod.nais.nasa.gov/pub/pub_library/Omb.html

Agency ombudsman information:NASA HeadquartersMail Code: LP011Washington, DC 20546-0001Phone: (202) 358-0445

Agency-procurementombudsman@nasa.gov

15

Contract Numbers: NNJ09GA02B & NNJ09GA04B

Prime Contractors: Space Exploration Technologies (SpaceX) & Orbital Sciences Corporation (Orbital)

Contract Type: FAR Part 12 Commercial Services, Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ)

Ordering Period: Dec 23, 2008 - Dec 31, 2015 ◦ Possible extension to Dec 31, 2016, Option to extend to Dec 31, 2017

Delivery Period End: December 31, 2016◦ Possible extension to Dec 31, 2017, Option to extend to Dec 31, 2018

Services currently provided on contract include: Cargo resupply missions to the ISS for pressurized or unpressurized cargo delivery, disposal, return, or any combination thereof

16

If an RFP is issued, the actual issued RFP and amendments take precedence over this conference or any draft RFP issued

Competition: Full and Open Competition; NAICS Code 481212 and Size Standard 1500 Employees

Subcontracting Goals:

Period of Performance: −Contract Ordering Period: May 2015 to December 2024

17

Small Businesses (SB) 9.0 %Small Disadvantaged Business Concerns (SDB) 1.5%Women Owned Small Business Concerns (WOSB)

1.0%

HUBZone Small Business Concerns (HBZ) 0.1%Veteran Owned Small Business Concerns (VOSB)

0.5%

Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Concerns (SDVOSB)

0.2%

Type of Contract: FAR Part 12 Commercial Services, Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ)

NASA may elect to award multiple contracts.

The guaranteed minimum value for any awarded contract is six (6) cargo resupply service missions with the capabilities defined for the awarded mission in Table I.A.3-1, Mission Capabilities for the Standard Resupply Services Mission.

The total maximum value of any contract awarded will be $14 billion. The total amount of all task orders under all contracts awarded shall not exceed $14 billion.

Services to be provided on contract include: ◦ Cargo resupply missions to the ISS for pressurized or unpressurized cargo delivery,

disposal, return, or any combination thereof◦ Special Task Assignments and Studies

18

19

CRS2 DRFP Section I CapabilitiesCRS2 DRFP Section I Capabilities

Marybeth EdeenMarybeth Edeen

20

Capability

Per Flight Range

Standard Mission

A

Standard Mission

B

Standard Mission

C

Standard Mission

D REQUIRED CAPABILITY: Pressurized Upmass Delivery (kg) Consisting of:

2500-5000 TBP TBP TBP TBP

M01 bag complement (#) 0-10 TBP TBP TBP TBP M02 bag complement (#) 6-100 TBP TBP TBP TBP M03 bag complement (#) 0-6 TBP TBP TBP TBP Single powered lockers with L-24 hour late load and 24 hour scrub turnaround (# lockers) 2-6 TBP TBP TBP TBP Conditioned stowage with L-24 hour late load and 24 hour scrub turn around (# bags) 2-6 TBP TBP TBP TBP Passive CTBEs with L-24 hour late load and 24 hour scrub turnaround (# CTBEs): 6-10 TBP TBP TBP TBP Including a Triple CTB with L-24 hour late load (# triple CTB) 0-1 TBP TBP TBP TBP Balance of CTBEs (# CTBEs to meet requirement of 74 CTBE/1000 kg)

TBP TBP TBP TBP

REQUIRED CAPABILITY: Pressurized Downmass Return (kg) Consisting of:

2500-5000 TBP TBP TBP TBP

M01 bag complement (#) 0-10 TBP TBP TBP TBP M02 bag complement (#) 6-100 TBP TBP TBP TBP M03 bag complement (#) 0-6 TBP TBP TBP TBP Powered lockers with R+24 hour hand over (# lockers) 2-6 TBP TBP TBP TBP Conditioned stowage with R+24 hour hand over (# bags) 2-6 TBP TBP TBP TBP Passive CTBEs with R+24 hour hand over (# CTBEs) 6-10 TBP TBP TBP TBP Balance of CTBEs (# CTBEs to meet requirement of 74 CTBE/1000 kg)

TBP TBP TBP TBP

21

REQUIRED CAPABILITY: Pressurized Disposal Downmass (kg) Consisting of:

2500-5000 TBP TBP TBP TBP

M01 bag complement (#) 0-10 TBP TBP TBP TBP M02 bag complement (#) 6-100 TBP TBP TBP TBP M03 bag complement (#) 0-6 TBP TBP TBP TBP Balance of CTBEs (# CTBEs to meet requirement of 74 CTBE/1000 kg)

TBP TBP TBP TBP

OPTIONAL CAPABILITY: Accelerated Pressurized Return Downmass (kg) Consisting of the same requirements as Pressurized Return Downmass with the following modifications: TBP TBP TBP TBP Powered lockers with R+6 hour in lieu of R+24 hour hand over (# lockers) 2-6 TBP TBP TBP TBP Conditioned stowage with R+6 hour in lieu of R+24 hour hand over (# bags) 2-6 TBP TBP TBP TBP Passive CTBEs with R+6 hour in lieu of R+24 hour hand over (# CTBEs) 2-10 TBP TBP TBP TBP Powered lockers with R+3 hour in lieu of R+6 hour hand over (# lockers) 1-2 TBP TBP TBP TBP REQUIRED CAPABILITY: Unpressurized Upmass and Disposal (kg) Consisting of:

800-1500 TBP TBP TBP TBP

Unpressurized upmass items (# items) 1-3 TBP TBP TBP TBP Unpressurized disposal items (# items) 1-3 TBP TBP TBP TBP DEFINE: Operational Capabilities Docking or Berthing D or B TBP TBP TBP TBP Mated Duration (days) 45+ TBP TBP TBP TBP

Offerors are required to provide 1) pressurized upmass, 2) pressurized return or pressurized disposal or both, 3) unpressurized upmass and disposal. Offerors have the option to provide accelerated pressurized return in lieu of pressurized return. Offerors can meet the required and optional capabilities by mixing them in any manner they choose within their 4 standard missions.

22

CRS2 DRFP Section II TopicsCRS2 DRFP Section II Topics

Omar CollierOmar Collier

23

MissionLevel

Milestone

Major Resupply Mission Milestone 

Invoice Submission

Date (ATP + or L- months)

Amount (%of Standard

Mission Price)

1 Authority To Proceed TBP TBP2 Vehicle Baseline Review TBP TBP3 Unpressurized Integration Review (if

applicable)TBP TBP

4 Mission Integration Review TBP TBP5 Cargo Integration Review TBP TBP6 Cargo Delivery to ISS TBP TBP7 Mission Completion TBP TBP

ISS Integratio

n Milestone

Major ISS Integration Certification Milestone

 

Invoice Submission

Date (Contract ATP + months)

Amount (% of ISS Integration

Cost in CLIN0002A)

1 Integration Review 1 ATP+TBP TBP2 Integration Review 2 ATP+TBP TBP3 Integration Review 3 ATP+TBP TBP4 Integration Review 4 ATP+TBP TBP5 Integration Review 5 ATP+TBP TBP6 Integration Review 6 ATP+TBP TBP7 Integration Review 7 ATP+TBP TBP

• Inclusion of payment constraints limits government risk while allowing service provider to make progress on integration in parallel with missions

• Constraints modified based on industry feedback and current practices

Purpose:◦ Define the terms and conditions for delivering non-NASA cargo

and performing contractor objectives unrelated to the ISS resupply mission

Constraints:◦ Shall not limit or interfere with the capabilities NASA is ordering◦ Notification timeline defined◦ Safety review process◦ Risk review process◦ Right to refuse◦ Resources required from ISS to evaluate the impacts to ensure

safety will be charged against an equitable adjustment

24

Purpose:◦ Ensure competition exists throughout the life of the contract for deliveries which

have not previously been awarded◦ To allow qualified service providers the opportunity to provide services at greater

value to the government◦ For providers to introduce new capabilities not available or identified at the time of

the award of the initial contract. Criteria: The Cargo Resupply Service provider shall have a plan to demonstrate ISS

integration as defined in paragraph 3.1 of the Statement of Work of the DRFP Minimum: The guaranteed minimum order amount for IDIQ contracts awarded in

accordance with the On-Ramp Clause will be two cargo resupply service missions Maximum: The maximum value of IDIQ contracts awarded in accordance with the

On-Ramp Clause are subject to the limitations of the total maximum value of any contract awarded of $14 billion, and the total amount of all task orders under all contracts awarded value of $14 billion

25

Task Orders may be issued from contract award through December 31, 2024

Contractor shall not be required to make any deliveries under this contract after December 31, 2024

Pricing for all Resupply Service Task Order Proposals shall not exceed the prices contained in the Schedule for the specific quantities being requested. Any Contractor proposed reduction will only be applicable to the Resupply Service Task Order addressed in the proposal and will not be deemed as a permanent reduction of the prices contained in the Schedule.

26

Identifies key positions and facilities for the work

Does not require key personnel in the key positions to be listed in the contract but does require updates to CO and COR at program reviews

27

18.1 NASA reserves the right to utilize Government-performed technical assessment of launch and cargo vehicles/configurations to evaluate the readiness of the Contractor to deliver NASA cargo to the ISS.

19.1 NASA insight and approval includes insight into any corporation, corporate divisions, subsidiaries, joint ventures, partner(s) and/or any other business entity actually performing launch or orbital vehicle manufacturing, management, orbital-to-launch vehicle integration, testing and launch.

19.2 NASA will retain approval authority over portions of the resupply service that interface with ISS hardware, cargo and operations.

19.3 NASA will retain insight into other components of the resupply service in order to assess the risk to the cargo itself and to its safe and timely delivery. NASA insight is defined as gaining an understanding necessary to knowledgeably assess the risk of Contractor actions or lack thereof through observation of manufacturing, processing or tests, review of documentation, and attendance at meetings and reviews, and review of flight performance.

28

Furnished Property◦ A comprehensive list of property is currently being developed and will be

incorporated into the RFP

Furnished Services and Data◦ Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System (TDRSS) and NASA Integrated

Services Network (NISN) support◦ The Government will make available the NASA Docking System (NDS)

data. ◦ Design data and acceptance test requirements for the systems below:

Common Communications for Visiting Vehicles (C2V2) Flight Releasable Attachment Mechanism (FRAM) designs Common Berthing Mechanism (CBM)

◦ Payload preparation capabilities at Kennedy Space Center (KSC) as defined in Attachment V.M., Payload Processing Capabilities Required at Launch Site, of the Statement of Work (SOW)

29

30

SOW, Attachments, and DRDsSOW, Attachments, and DRDsMarybeth EdeenMarybeth Edeen

The SOW, Attachment A, is composed of 4 sections, which outlines the following:

◦ 1.0 Scope◦ 2.0 Standard Resupply Service Mission◦ 3.0 Special Task Assignments and Studies◦ 4.0 Program Management

31

The end-to-end service shall include all activities to provide the resupply services including launch and landing site and associated resources, launch vehicle, ISS visiting vehicle, reentry vehicle and the manner in which these are architected and implemented by the Contractor.

NASA requires the service to be provided in no fewer than four (4) flights per year with the cargo somewhat evenly distributed throughout the year.

The only Crew interaction with the vehicle shall be during the period when the vehicle is mated to ISS.

For the initial mission of a Contractor’s vehicle, additional orbital maneuvers may be required to be demonstrated while outside the ISS approach ellipsoid. For the initial mission only, cargo capabilities may be lower than those defined in the SOW and will be negotiated on a case-by-case basis.

32

Required Capabilities◦ Pressurized Delivery Upmass◦ Pressurized Return Downmass or Pressurized Disposal Downmass◦ Unpressurized Delivery Upmass and Disposal Downmass

◦ Dual Docked/Berthed Visiting Vehicles◦ Common Communications for Visiting Vehicles◦ Minimum 45 days docked/berthed◦ Launch and landing attempts on 2 out of every 3 days within a TBP launch window◦ Defined cargo types/quantities and variability, delivery and return timing,

integrated operations approach

Optional Capabilities◦ Accelerated Pressurized Return◦ Launch on Need (LON)

Safety and Mission Assurance and NASA Insight and Approval

33

ISS Integration

Requirements Change Evaluation

Special Tasks and Studies

34

Formal Reviews◦ Program Reviews◦ Technical Reviews (per mission)

Vehicle Baseline Review Mission Integration Review Unpressurized Integration Review Cargo Integration Review Post Delivery Review Post Mission Review

◦ ISS Integration Certification Reviews (per vehicle design) ISS Integration Certification Milestones 1-7

Progress towards ISS Integration Vehicle development to meet ISS integration requirements Safety External licenses/agreements

35

Configuration Management Export Control Management Scheduling Data Review for Crew Privacy

36

DRDs that are anticipated to be due with the proposal are : ◦ Mishap Preparedness and Contingency Plan◦ Safety and Health Plan◦ Mission Integration and Operations Management Plan (MIOMP)◦ Work Plan◦ Organizational Conflict of Interest Avoidance Plan

Attachments◦ Small Business Subcontracting Plan

37

38

Instructions and Evaluation OverviewInstructions and Evaluation Overview

Marybeth Edeen/David WilsonMarybeth Edeen/David Wilson

Volume I - Offer Volume− Model Contract

− Representations and Certifications

− DRDs

− Minimum Requirements

Volume II - Mission Suitability Factor− Subfactor A Technical Approach

System Capabilities and Summary of Performance Initial ISS Integration Certification ISS Resupply Mission Performance Plan

− Subfactor B Management Plan Company Organization Performance Milestones Safety and Mission Assurance

− Subfactor C Small Business Utilization Small Business Subcontracting Commitment to Small Business

Volume III - Price Proposal Volume IV - Past Performance

39

Pay close attention to ensure that the number of pages, page margins, font type, font size, and page size are in conformance to VI.A.18 Proposal Preparation-General Instructions

Please note page limitations.—Some volumes/sections are subject to a page limitation and others are not.

• In the Past Performance Volume, the Past Performance Information is subject to the page limit of 25 pages, but the Environmental Non-Compliance, OSHA Forms 300 and 300A, Insurance Carrier Information, and Consent Letter are not subject to the page limitation.

—Proposal information must be provided in the correct volume.—Proposal page limitations for Mission Suitability Volume is anticipated to

be updated to an undivided page limit for Technical and Management Subfactors (e.g. 225 pages for Technical, Management, and Appendixes).

Having non-conforming pages returned may affect the government’s evaluation of a proposal, and how this proposal is ultimately rated.

40

Price is approximately equal to the combination of Mission Suitability and Past Performance.

Mission Suitability is more important than Past Performance.

Price is more important than Mission Suitability.

Price is more important than Past Performance.

41

Subfactor A – Technical Approach - 650 points◦ System Capability and Summary of Performance

Meet the requirements in the SOW and per flight ranges as defined More comprehensive compliment of capabilities

Meet the need in 4 flights per year Provide LON capability More types/higher quantities of capabilities Provide flexibility for cargo Meet the research needs

Operational maturity of proposed capabilities

◦ Initial ISS Integration Certification Schedule and plans

◦ ISS Resupply Mission Performance Plan Technical feasibility of approach per MIOMP

◦ Risks and External Dependencies

42

Subfactor B – Management Approach – 300 points ◦ Company Information

Proposed management team and org structure Teaming arrangements Management plan

◦ Performance Milestones Compliance with limitations Risk to NASA

◦ Safety and Mission Assurance Safety, reliability, maintainability, supportability, quality, software

assurance, and risk management approach Mishap Preparedness and Contingency Plan Safety and Health Plan

Subfactor C – Small Business Utilization – 50 points◦ Small Business Subcontracting Plan compared to small business goals

43

44

PricingPricing

David WilsonDavid WilsonLead Price AnalystLead Price Analyst

Sub-CLIN 0001A-D Standard Mission Prices Sub-CLIN 0001E Provision of Early Cargo

Integration Hardware Sub-CLIN 0002A Initial ISS Integration

Certification Sub-CLIN 0002B NASA Requirements Changes Sub-CLIN 0002C Special Task Assignment and

Studies◦ Government Furnished Equipment, Property and

Services (GFEPS) Template◦ Milestone Payment Schedule Templates

Price analysis to validate price reasonableness on all proposed Standard Mission Pricing table and Special Task Assignment prices.

Mission Price Evaluation: (CLIN 0002A ISS Integration Certification Price) + the sum of (CLIN 0001 Contract Years 2017-2024 NTE Standard Mission prices at ½ annual demand for pressurized upmass).◦ 15,000kg annual demand for pressurized upmass◦ 2,000kg annual demand for unpressurized upmass◦ Time Value of Money◦ Government Furnished Equipment, Property and

Services (GFEPS) (FAR 45.202)

47

Additional InformationAdditional Information

Omar CollierOmar Collier

When reading the DRFP, note that:−Important information is contained in the SF 1449 and numerous

clauses and provisions that have been incorporated, via full text and/or referenced text, throughout the document

−Clauses incorporated by reference have the same force and effect as if they were included in their full text

−Section V. Attachments includes documents, exhibits, and other attachments

• For example, Statement of Work (SOW); Glossary; Data Requirement Descriptions (DRD); Acronyms and Abbreviations

48

Minimum Requirements (IV.A.1)

Commercial Space Act Requirements◦ Certification Regarding United States Commercial Provider of

Space Transportation Services

Organizational Conflict of Interest

49

Offeror’s initial proposal should contain the best terms from a price and technical standpoint

The Government preference is to award without discussions, however, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions with those Offerors who have made it to competitive range

If discussions are held, the Offeror will:−have the opportunity to correct weaknesses and; −be requested to resubmit the SF1449 with Final Proposal

Revisions (FPR) which will include clearly marked changes

50

51

For your proposal to be considered timely, your package must be delivered to Building 420 by the due date and time stated in the RFP.

Review all proposal delivery instructions with your courier to stress the importance of timeliness and the proper location of delivery.◦ Shipping and Receiving will give your courier a receipt of delivery.

When delivering a proposal in person, remember to deliver the proposal through Gate 4, and not through the Central JSC Gate 1.◦ Directions to Gate 4 are in the proposal instructions.

Allot at least 48 hours to over-night a proposal through a mail carrier.◦ A commercial/government mail carrier may have a mechanical breakdown or otherwise fail to

deliver in a timely manner. If you choose to deliver in person on the due date, remember that late flights, traffic

jams, and congestion in the JSC area may affect the timeliness of your proposal. Review the proposal instructions, coordinate with the point of contact in advance of

the delivery, and ask questions if any instructions are not clear.

NOTE TO PROSPECTIVE OFFERORS

Prospective Offerors are reminded not to contact incumbent personnel (either directly or through electronic means) during duty hours or at their place of employment, as such contacts are disruptive to the performance of the current contract

52

Questions may be submitted

◦ Through the CRS2 website at http://procurement.jsc.nasa.gov/crs2/questions.asp

◦ Using the Microsoft Lync messaging

53

54

Q&A, Schedule, and Closing Remarks

For questions submitted during the conference that we do not answer during this period, your question and our response will be posted with a later CRS2 Q&A posting.

Reminder: All contractual and technical questions must be submitted in writing (e-mail) not later than August 8, 2014.

55

Release of Final Request for Proposal (RFP) 09/30/14

Questions or Comments for Final RFP due10/23/14

Proposals Due 11/14/14

Contract Award 04/28/15

56

This concludes the This concludes the ISS CRS2ISS CRS2

Pre-Solicitation ConferencePre-Solicitation Conference

Thank You for your participation.Thank You for your participation.

57