Date post: | 29-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | lauren-ross |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Bologna 2007
The dark energy problem
GTRgR 82
1
gravity matter
1tot 3.0cluster
1 XX
X wp
Solution: modify either the Matter sector
or the Gravity sector
)( gF )(8 GT
...but remember :
DE
MG
Bologna 2007
Modified matter
Problem:All the matter particles we know possess an effective interaction range that is
much smaller the cosmological ones
the effective pressure is always positive !
Solution:add new forms of matter with strong interaction/self-interaction
the effective pressure can be large and negative
Dark Energy=scalar fields, generalized perfect fluids etc
Bologna 2007
Can we detect traces of modified gravity atbackground linear level ?non-linear
{ }
Modified gravity
Bologna 2007
What is gravity ?
A universal force in 4D mediated by a massless tensor field
What is modified gravity ?
What is modified gravity ?
A non-universal force in nD mediated by (possibly massive) tensor, vector and scalar fields
Bologna 2007
Cosmology and modified gravity
in laboratory
in the solar system
at astrophysical scales
at cosmological scales
} very limited time/space/energy scales;only baryons
complicated by non-linear/non-gravitational effects
unlimited scales; mostly linear processes;baryons, dark matter, dark energy !
Bologna 2007
L = crossover scale:
• 5D gravity dominates at low energy/late times/large scales
• 4D gravity recovered at high energy/early times/small scales
5D Minkowski bulk:
infinite volume extra dimension
gravity leakage
2
1
1
rVLr
rVLr
brane
Simplest MG (I): DGP
RgxdLRgxdS 4)5()5(5
(Dvali, Gabadadze, Porrati 2000)(Dvali, Gabadadze, Porrati 2000)
3
82 G
L
HH
Bologna 2007
f(R) models are simple and self-contained (no need of potentials) easy to produce acceleration (first inflationary model) high-energy corrections to gravity likely to introduce higher-order terms particular case of scalar-tensor and extra-dimensional theory
matterL+Rfgxd 4eg higher order corrections ...324 RR+Rgxd
Let’s start with one of the simplest MG model: f(R)
Simplest MG (II): f(R)
Bologna 2007
Is this already ruled out by
local gravity? matterL+Rfgxd )(4
is a scalar-tensor theory with Brans-Dickeparameter ω=0 or
a coupled dark energy model with coupling β=1/2
''
1
'
4'
''
1
)1()3
41(
22
/2*
ff
fRf
fm
eGeGG rrm
(on a local minimum)
α
λ
Bologna 2007
Dark Fog
The trouble with f(R): it’s Fourth Order Gravity (FOG) !
Higher order equations introduce: new solutions (acceleration ?)
new instabilities (is the universe stable?)
''3])126('[2
1'3 22 fRHfHHfHf m
Bologna 2007
The simplest caseThe simplest case
matterL+
R
μRgxd
44
2/1=β
03
0)'(3
mm H
VH
In Einstein Frame
2
33
2
3)'(3
mmm
m
H
VH
Turner, Carroll, Capozzielloetc. 2003
)'(g 2 gf
'log
'
')'(
2
f
f
ffRV
Bologna 2007
R-1/R model :R-1/R model : the the φφMDEMDE
rad mat
field
rad mat
fieldMDE
toda
y
9/1=Ωφ
2/1=β
a= t 1/2Caution:Plots in theEinstein frame!
)( 3
8
2
33
2
3)'(3
2
m
mmm
m
H
H
VH
2/3t=ainstead of !!
In Jordan frame:
Bologna 2007
Sound horizon in R+RSound horizon in R+Rnn model model
dec
dec
z
z
s
zH
dz
zH
dzc
0 )(/
)(
2/1t=a
3/1=weff
!!2a...and by the way
L.A., D. Polarski, S. Tsujikawa, PRL 98, 131302, astro-ph/0603173
Bologna 2007
Classification of f(R) solutions
,...)21
)1(2(
,...)1
3(
)0,5,4(
)0,0,1(
)0,0,1(
)2,1,0(
6
5
4
3
2
1
m
mP
m
mP
P
P
P
P
deSitter acceleration, w = -1
General acceleration, any w0
)1(2
)107(1
0
0
2
0
2
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
mm
For all f(R) theories, define the characteristic curve:
The problem is: can we go from matter to acceleration?
wrong matter era (t1/2)
good matter era (t2/3) for m≥0
fRfr
fRfrm
/'
'/'')(
Bologna 2007
The m,r plane
The dynamics becomes 1-dimensional !
The qualitative behavior of any f(R) model can beunderstood by looking at the geometrical properties of the
m,r plot
m(r) curve
crit. line
acceleration
matter era
deSitter
L.A., D. Polarski, S. Tsujikawa, PRD, astro-ph/0612180
f
Rfr
f
Rfrm
'
'
'')(
Bologna 2007
The triangle of viable trajectories
There exist only two kinds of cosmologically viable trajectories
baRRf )()(
pp
p
RRRf 1
1
1 )()(naRRRf )(
Notice that in the triangle m>0
Bologna 2007
Constraints on viable trajectories
Cosmological constraints
Constraint from thematter expansion:CMB peak requires
m(past)<0.1
Constraint from accelerated expansion:SN require
m(present)<0.1
Bologna 2007
Viable trajectories are cool !
Viable trajectories have a very peculiar effective equation of state
Define wDE implicitely as
daawaw
aaHH
DE
wmm
11
)ˆ1(3320
2
)(logˆ
])1([
We find )1(
3
9
1
,
2
2Rm
DE f
HR
Hw
Theorem: diverges if grows in the past, i.e. if Rf , 0)( Rm
Corollary: all viable f(R) cosmologies possess a divergent
DEw
DEw
baRRf )()( L.A., S. Tsujikawa, 2007
Bologna 2007
Phantom crossing
Conclusions: for all viable f(R) models
there is a phantom crossing of there is a singularity of both occur typically at low z when 1m
DEwDEw
phantom DE
standard DE
baRRf )()(
Bologna 2007
Crossing/singularity as signatures of
modified gravity The same phenomenon occurs for
DGP (Alam et al 2005) Scalar,Vector, Tensor models (Libanov et al. 2007)
and in the Riess et al. (2004) dataset !!
Nesseris Perivolaropoulos 2005
Bologna 2007
...but don’t forget theLocal Gravity Constraints...
However, if we apply naively the LGC at the present epoch.
mmfm 1''01
!!10'
'')( 58
0
000
f
fRrm
Bologna 2007
relaxing the Local Gravity Constraints ?
However, the mass depends on the local field configuration
623 1010'
'')(
s
sss f
fRRm
depending on the experiment: laboratory, solar system, galaxy
see eg. Nojiri & Odintsov 2003; Brookfield et al. 2006Navarro & Van Acoyelen 2006; Faraoni 2006; Bean et al. 2006;Chiba et al. 2006; Hu, Sawicky 2007;....
Bologna 2007
LGC+Cosmology
Take for instance the ΛCDM clone
baRRf )()(
Applying the criteria of LGC and Cosmology
23101 ba
i.e. ΛCDM to an incredible precision
Bologna 2007
MG at the linear level
At the linear perturbation level and sub-horizon scales, a modified gravity model will
mmakQGak ),(4 22 modify Poisson’s equation
induce an anisotropic stress
modify the growth of perturbations
)])(21()21[( 222222 dzdydxdtads
),( ak
0),(4')'
1('' kkk akGQH
H
Bologna 2007
MG at the linear level
scalar-tensor models
2
2
2
2
0,
*
'
')(
'32
)'(2)(
FF
Fa
FF
FF
FG
GaQ
cav
0),(
1),(
ak
akQ
standard gravity
DGP
13
2)(
21;3
11)(
a
wHraQ DEc
f(R)
Ra
km
Ra
km
a
Ra
km
Ra
km
FG
GaQ
cav2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
0,
*
21
)(,
31
41)(
Lue et al. 2004; Koyama et al. 2006
Bean et al. 2006Hu et al. 2006Tsujikawa 2007
coupled Gauss-Bonnet see L. A., C. Charmousis, S. Davis 2006...)(
...)(
a
aQ
Boisseau et al. 2000Acquaviva et al. 2004Schimd et al. 2004
Bologna 2007
Observer
Dark matter halos
Background sources
Radial distances depend on
geometry of Universe
Probing gravity with weak lensing
Statistical measure of shear pattern, ~1% distortion
Foreground mass distribution depends on growth/distribution of structure
Bologna 2007
Probing gravity with weak lensing
In General Relativity, lensing is causedby the “lensing potential”
and this is related to the matter perturbationsvia Poisson’s equation. Therefore the lensing signal depends on thetwo modified gravity functions
and in the growth function
in the WL power spectrum
Bologna 2007
Growth of fluctuations
A good fit to the linear growth of fluctuations is
where
LCDM
DE
DGP
ST
we parametrizeInstead of
Peebles 1980Lahav et al. 1991Wang et al. 1999Bernardeau et al. 2002L.A. 2004Linder 2006
Bologna 2007
Weak lensing measures Dark Gravity
DGP Phenomenological DE
Weak lensing tomography over half sky
LCDM
DGP
L.A., M. Kunz, D. Sapone arXiv:0704.2421
Bologna 2007
Weak lensing measures Dark Gravity
scalar-tensor model
Weak lensing tomography over half sky V. Acquaviva, L.A., C. Baccigalupi, in prep.
Bologna 2007
Non-linearity
N-Body simulations
Higher-order perturbation theory
Maccio’ et al. 2004Jain et al. 2006....
Kamionkowski et al. 2000Gaztanaga et al. 2003Freese et al. 2002Makler et al. 2004Lue et al. 2004L.A. & C. Quercellini 2004....
Bologna 2007
N-body simulations in MG
Two effects: DM mass is varying, G is different for baryons and DM
22 r
Gm
r
eGmHvv b
Cc
bb
mb mc
22
*
)2(r
Gm
r
emGvHv b
Cc
cc
Dark energy/dark matter coupling
Bologna 2007
N-body simulations
A. Maccio’, L.A.,C. Quercellini, S. Bonometto, R. Mainini 2004
Λ β=0.15 β=0.25
Bologna 2007
N-body simulations: halo profiles
β-dependent behaviour towards the halo center.
Higher β: smaller rc
2
1
)(:
cc
c
cr
r
r
r
r
rNFW
Bologna 2007
Conclusions: the teachings of DE
There is much more than meets the eyes in the Universe Two solutions to the DE mismatch: either add “dark energy” or “dark gravity” The high precision data of present and near-future observations allow to test for dark energy/gravity It is crucial to combine background and perturbations Weak Lensing is a good bet...(to be continued)
Bologna 2007
An ultra-An ultra-lightlight scalar field scalar field
DM
FIf
Abu
ndan
ce
MassL.A. & R. Barbieri 2005
Adopting a PNGBpotential
eVmm 3030 10/
Hubble size Galactic size
Bologna 2007
Dark energy as scalar gravity
Einstein frameEinstein frame Jordan frame Jordan frame
TRR
CTT
CTT
mLRL
m
mm
m
82
1
),(
,)(;)(
,)(;)(
;;;,
,
,
;)(
;)(
)(
)(2
18
)2
1(
0
0
)()(
fL
LLT
RRL
T
T
mLRfL
R
R
R
m
m
geg f ˆ'2
Bologna 2007
An extra gravityAn extra gravity
0)/13
41(4')2
'1(''
22
2
kkkkm
GH
H
)3
41( 2* rmeGG
Newtonian limit: the scalar interaction generates an attractive extra-gravity
Yukawa term
in real space
Bologna 2007
Understanding Understanding dark energydark energy
Let him who seeks continue seeking until he finds. When he finds, he will become troubled. When he becomes troubled, he will be astonished
Coptic Gospel of Thomas