+ All Categories
Home > Documents > BPSK - NASA ci an Optical Relay Satellite Using Reed-Solomon Coding Over a Cascaded Optical PPM and...

BPSK - NASA ci an Optical Relay Satellite Using Reed-Solomon Coding Over a Cascaded Optical PPM and...

Date post: 30-Mar-2019
Category:
Upload: vunhu
View: 217 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
15
Performance ci an Optical Relay Satellite Using Reed-Solomon Coding Over a Cascaded Optical PPM and BPSK Channel D. Divsalar CommunicationsSystems Research Section F. Naderi TelecommunicationsSystems Section The concept of using a rehy satellite which receives information fiom deep space vehicles over an optical channel and rehys this information to Earth over a microwave channel has been considered in the past, An importcnt consideration in such a system is the nature of the opticalfmicrowave interface aboard the rehy satellite. In order to allow for the maximum system flexibility, without overburdening either the optical or RF channel, this paper considers the option of demodulating the opt~cal channel on boani the rehy satellite but leaving the optical channel decoding to be performed at the ground station. This not only removes some degree of complexity ftom the rehy wellire but nwre importantly it circumvents resmcting all deep space vehicles to a specific channel coding for which the decodei is provided on board the rehy. For this scheme to be viable, the occurrence cf erasures in the optical channel must be properly trented. A hard decision on the emsure (ie., the rehy selecting a symbol at mndom in case of erasure occurrence) seriously clegmdes the pcrfomnce of the ovewll sysrcm irr inis paper, we suggest coding the emsure ~ccuncficcs at the r2hy and tmnsmitting this infonnation via an extra bit to the ground station where it can be used by the decoder. Many examples with vatying billphoton Pncrgy efficiency and for the noisy and noiseless optical channel have been considered. It is shown that coding the emsure occuvences dmmatkally improves rhe performance of the cascaded channel rehtive to the case of hard decision on the crasure by the relay. 117 https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19820024666 2019-03-30T10:22:52+00:00Z
Transcript
Page 1: BPSK - NASA ci an Optical Relay Satellite Using Reed-Solomon Coding Over a Cascaded Optical PPM and BPSK Channel D. Divsalar Communications Systems Research Section F. Naderi Telecommunications

Performance ci an Optical Relay Satellite Using Reed-Solomon Coding Over a Cascaded Optical PPM

and BPSK Channel D. Divsalar

Communications Systems Research Section

F. Naderi Telecommunications Systems Section

The concept of using a rehy satellite which receives information fiom deep space vehicles over an optical channel and rehys this information to Earth over a microwave channel has been considered in the past, An importcnt consideration in such a system is the nature of the opticalfmicrowave interface aboard the rehy satellite. In order to allow for the maximum system flexibility, without overburdening either the optical or RF channel, this paper considers the option of demodulating the opt~cal channel on boani the rehy satellite but leaving the optical channel decoding to be performed at the ground station.

This not only removes some degree of complexity ftom the rehy wellire but nwre importantly it circumvents resmcting all deep space vehicles to a specific channel coding for which the decodei is provided on board the rehy. For this scheme to be viable, the occurrence cf erasures in the optical channel must be properly trented. A hard decision on the emsure (ie., the rehy selecting a symbol at mndom in case of erasure occurrence) seriously clegmdes the pcrfomnce of the ovewll sysrcm i r r inis paper, we suggest coding the emsure ~ccuncficcs at the r2hy and tmnsmitting this infonnation via an extra bit to the ground station where it can be used by the decoder. Many examples with vatying billphoton Pncrgy efficiency and for the noisy and noiseless optical channel have been considered. It is shown that coding the emsure occuvences dmmatkally improves rhe performance of the cascaded channel rehtive to the case of hard decision on the crasure by the relay.

117

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19820024666 2019-03-30T10:22:52+00:00Z

Page 2: BPSK - NASA ci an Optical Relay Satellite Using Reed-Solomon Coding Over a Cascaded Optical PPM and BPSK Channel D. Divsalar Communications Systems Research Section F. Naderi Telecommunications

1. Introduction Optical communication systems have been studies in the

past as a means of improving and/or expanding the capabilities of NASA's current Deep Space Network (Ref. I). The princi- pal advan*3ge in communicating with optical frequencies is the potential increase in the information that can be trans- mitted to Earth from a deep space vehicle (DSV) having limited power and a structurally small antenna. However, Earth's atmosphere and adverse weather effrcts introduce attenuation and possible outages which limit thz reliability of an Earth-based oprical system.

In order to elirinate the atmospheric effects detrimental to ,ptical links, an orbiting relay satellite might be employed. Such a satellite outside the Earth's atmosphere at the geosyn- chronous orbit would receive signals from the deep space vehicle over an optical link and subsequently relay the signals to Earth via a conventional microwave link (Ref. 2). Under this concept one would exploit advantages afforded by an optical link while diminatinn snmc oi its negative attributes. Figure 1 shows the block diagram for the opticallmicrowave communication syptem.

In the above, an important consideration is the n;ture of the optical/microwave lir k interface. Two alternatives were discussed in an earlier report (Ref. 2) and are briefly discussed here. Figure 2 shows thz interface for option 1. Here the c t- put of the photodetector is demcdulated and decoded to recover the baseband data, which then modulates an ai. car- rier prior tu transrcission to Earth. The overd! bit error prob- nhtlitv a t t h gitwi:i station IS gven by the expressioc

PE = PERF + PE, - 2PERF PE, %PERF + PE4 I )

where PER,= and PE, are the bit error probabilities in the microwave and optical links respectively. The principal disad- vantage o f !his scheme. which we shall refer to as a "demodu- late and decode," is that by placing the demodulator and the decoder on the relay. the system is dictating the modulation and channel coding schemes to be used by all deep space vehicles which want t o communicate through the relay satellite.

To mitigate this problem, the satellite can be operated in the "bent pipe" mode. Figure 3 shows the optical/microwave interface for this option where tile analog output of the photodetector, x ( t ) . dircctly modulates (e.g.. FM) an RF carrier. At the ground station, the RF carrier is demodulated 10 get an estimate of x ( f ) . which is then routed to an optical uimodulator and a channel decoder to recover tile basebatid data. While this schemc offers the most flexibility. i t also

imposes a wide bandwidth requirement on the microwave link. The performance ~t %s system is being studied.

As a compromise between the above two alternatives, a third option is discussed and evaluated in this paper. In order to eliminate the wi t - '.andwidth requirement nf the benL pipe option and yet retain somi? degree of flexibility in the system, consider the case where the ouiput of the photodetector on the relay satellite is demodulated but not decoded. The demodulated bit stream moddates an RF carrier for trans- mission to the grwrld station where the chmer is demodulated and decoded trl recover the baseband data.

As an example, the optical link may use ReedSolomon (RS) coding followed by a pulse position modulation PPM) IO transmit data from deep space to the relay satellite where the received signal is demodulated and the ensuing bit s t r em modulites an RF carrier using binary phase shift keying (BPSK). In the next section we analyze the performance of this system.

II. Performance of Reed-Solamon Coding Over Cascaded Optical PPM and BPSK Channel

In this Fuction we analyze the performance of an (N, E;) RS code over cascaded Mary optical PPM and binary F'SK chan- nels. The mathematical model for the system under considera- tion ir hown in Fig. 4. Allowing for erasure, the PPM channel a n be modeled as an M-ary input (M t I)ary output discrete memoryless channel (DMC), characterized by symbol error probability P,, erasure probability P, and correct symbd probability P,, shown in Fig. 5 .

Two cases are considered. In the first case the erasure is eliminated on the relay satellite by hard decision (i.e., a sym- bol is randemly selected in case of an eiasure occurrence). In the second case, the occurrence of an erasure is properly coded and !ransmitted to the ground station where this information is used by the decoder.

Case A - Hard Decision on Erasures at the Refay

in :h, case of hard decision, the symbol error probability P& and correct symbol probability Pcj, are c;en by

and

118

Page 3: BPSK - NASA ci an Optical Relay Satellite Using Reed-Solomon Coding Over a Cascaded Optical PPM and BPSK Channel D. Divsalar Communications Systems Research Section F. Naderi Telecommunications

After PPM demodulation (and the hard d :ision) RS symuols must be sent over a binary symmetric channel (BW) charac- terized by bit error probability Pb given as

(4)

where Eb is energy per bit and No is the one-sided noise spec- tral density at the ground station. Since edch RS symbol can be represented by n = log2 M bits, transmission of an RS symbol can be modeled by a (BSC)" channel as depicted in Fig. 6.

The equivalent cascaded Mary PPM diannel, wilh hard- decided erasure symbols, and (BSCP channel is shown in Fig. 7. From this figure, the syvbol error probability 0; the equivalent channel is given by

ngh = 1 - [(I -2) (1 -Pb-y) t'A-l .L 3 (5;

If an (N, K ) RS code is used in cr.njimction with the cascade2 channel, a word error occurs when there are more than (N - K)/2 symbol errors in the N symbol received code word; then the word error probability ot the !IS code is given by

where N = M - I . Note thvt for large alphabet size RS codes in which we are interested, since the mass of spheres (with radius of one-half of the code minimum distance) around the code words is much smaller than the mass of total signal space, for a practical range of bit error rates, the prooability of an incorrect decoding event ian be ignored. Thus when rh: RS code fails to decode, we may hdve a bit in error. Under these conditions a bit error ~CPUIS wbsn a bit in a received symbol is in error and there arc (N - K) /2 or more symbol errors in the remaining N - I symbols in a received code word. Then the bit error rate of the RS iUdc is given by

In (7). the expression in brsckets represents the bit error probability before RS dccoding and the summation in (7)

represents the probability of making (N - K)/2 or more sym- bol errors in N - 1 symbols of ieceived code word.

Caw B - No Hard W s i o n On h 8 u m a t h s We now consider the case where erasure information is

encoded and relayed to the p u n d station and compare the performance with that of hard.decided erasure on the relay.

In order to transmit the erasure symbols over tlte downlink BSC, an extra bit is appwded to the RS symbols. (We shall see shortly that for the range of Eb/No of interest, one extra bit is sufficient to achieve acceptable performance). This means that symbols sent over the BSC cnannel are of lengtns rl + 1 bits. At thc ground station the decoder examines the (n t 1)rk bit; if it is zero, the decoder accepts tire first n bits as the RS symbol. However, if the appended bit is oiie, the receiver declares an erasure symbol and disregards the first n bits. For this case for each transmission cf RS or eiasure symbols the channel can be modclled as (BSCy+l. The equivalent cas- caded PPM and (BSCY+l channel is shown in Fig.8. From thi~ figure. the symbol erasure probability of the equivalent channel is:

and the symbol error prouability is

M - 1 ns = P, [l -!1 -rbrj I ! - P b ) t - M 'ePb

While the correct

", = PC(

vmbol probability is

_Pb)"+l t - 1 Pepb AM? 1 Ps M

From the above three equations, the v drd error and the bit error probability of the RS ccde we, the equivdent channel of Fig. 8 are given by (Ref. 3).

118

Page 4: BPSK - NASA ci an Optical Relay Satellite Using Reed-Solomon Coding Over a Cascaded Optical PPM and BPSK Channel D. Divsalar Communications Systems Research Section F. Naderi Telecommunications

ORlGINAt PA=

OF pm *Iwn Next the procedure is repeated for the case of a noisy 0pti- and cal channel. In the presence of background mise. a F h threshold detector (Ref. 3) is used where for each slot in the PPM framcthe number of received photons is compared with a

i = O j=A A’ threnfiold y to decide the presence or the absence of the sigd. P,(Rs) = - M Ng (7) r ; i ) - i + j Z ( M - 1)

where

. $ ,,i p4-i Assume Poison distribution .n the number of received photons in each dot, with a mean K, in the absence of the signal and mean K, t K, in the presence of a ygnal in th dot. Then the probability of correctly detecting the p m r af the signal is given by

(I2) s e e

A = U A X (N - K + 1 - 2 i, 0) (13)

111. Numericaf Resub In order to compare the performance of the two cases

discussed in the previous section, we now consider specific examples. Consider using Wary PPM with M = 256 and three RS codes, namely (255.223), (255.191) and (255,127).

and the probability of correctly detecting the absence of the Signal (or presence of the noise) is given by

= 2 (5 e-Kb A!

t = 0 Both noisy and miseless optical channels are considered. p&l

Assurnkg no background noise, the PPM channel can be viewed as a purely erasure channel with

Using Eqs. (19) and (20) we have

P, = (M- 1)(1 -P*)(l -P*)qH,--’ pe = e-Ks (14)

and

Pc = P*%-‘

Pe = 1 - 9 - 9 where K, is the average number of photon counts per PPM frame of the optical channel. For the case of harddecided erasures, using Eqs. (14) and ( 1 5) above in Eqs. (2) and (3) with P, set to zero, we have

These results are ~ x t used in bs. (2) and (3) to calculate p a and Pdl and in Eqs. (8) through (10) to calculate ne, ns and n,, which are subsequently used to calculate P,(RS) and Pb(RS). The threshold 7 has been optimized to give minimum bit error rates. f b # ? S ) and P,JRS) are shown in Figs. 11-20.

M - 1 -K, 6, e -

p a -7 and

Using these results, we have plotted the bit error rate of the end-toend system (i.e.. Pbh(RS)) tor the harddecided erasure from Eq. (7) ana P,(E S) for the cGded erasure fram Eq. ( 1 2) as a function of EJK, of the microwave channel for various energy cfficiency of p bitslphoton where p is given by

The results are pven L i Figs. 9-1 1 .

IV. Conclusion This paper has considercd an optical relay satellite system

which has been modeled as a cascaded optical PPM and micro- wave BPSK channel. In order to maintain maximum system Rexibility, the rdlay satellite demodulates but does not decode the optical channel; the decoding is performed by the ground station. The occurrence of optical erasures is properly coded by the relay and transmitted to the ground decoder using an extra bit. It is shown that this improves the overall system prformance dramatically relative to the case where the relay makes hard decision on the erasures, thereby screening the :Jound decoder from the kmwledge of such erasure occur tnces.

1 20

Page 5: BPSK - NASA ci an Optical Relay Satellite Using Reed-Solomon Coding Over a Cascaded Optical PPM and BPSK Channel D. Divsalar Communications Systems Research Section F. Naderi Telecommunications

I . Vilnrottrr. V. A.. and Gaglirrdi. R. M.. “OpticdCuinnruniatiun Systems for Deep Sp8t.r Applitationt.” Publication 80-7. Jet Propulson Ldboru;.wy. Pasadena. Cdi- fomh. March I S . 1980.

2 . Caglrardi. K. M.. Vilnrottcr. V. A.. and Dulinar. S. 4.. “0ptic.d Dcep Sprcv Communi- c ~ t i m nr Relay Satellite.” Puhlkatitw 8 1 4 . Jet hopulson hbor8101y. b d e n a . Cdiiornrr. August 15, 1981.

3. Lcsh. J. R.. h~t. I., Tan. H. 14.. and Zwillinpcr. D.. “2.5-Bitil)etcctcd Photon Demon- stration Prograin. Analysis and Phase I Results.” TDA R q w s Report 42M. Jet Propuhon Lyh.iratom, l?i.udrlw. Cdrfomia. pp. 115-122, kxmbei 15. 1981.

121

Page 6: BPSK - NASA ci an Optical Relay Satellite Using Reed-Solomon Coding Over a Cascaded Optical PPM and BPSK Channel D. Divsalar Communications Systems Research Section F. Naderi Telecommunications

'I -- J

122

Page 7: BPSK - NASA ci an Optical Relay Satellite Using Reed-Solomon Coding Over a Cascaded Optical PPM and BPSK Channel D. Divsalar Communications Systems Research Section F. Naderi Telecommunications

I I

c

I I MICROWAVE I

I *RE<IMR

L- I

I m I

123

Page 8: BPSK - NASA ci an Optical Relay Satellite Using Reed-Solomon Coding Over a Cascaded Optical PPM and BPSK Channel D. Divsalar Communications Systems Research Section F. Naderi Telecommunications

I I

sp*cEcRAfl r-- - - - ---- 1 O P - O M U S 1 r--------

G R O W STATION r--------- 1 Lr’

! I I I I I I I I I I

124

Page 9: BPSK - NASA ci an Optical Relay Satellite Using Reed-Solomon Coding Over a Cascaded Optical PPM and BPSK Channel D. Divsalar Communications Systems Research Section F. Naderi Telecommunications

M

M * l

(1 - P d " 1 - - 1 _ .

Pb (1 - Pb)"-l

Pb (1 - Pb)"-'

p?b (1 - P$'*

\ \

(1 - Pbf = f 2x 2"

I

2

lNlul

M

1

P

M

M

M + 1

125

Page 10: BPSK - NASA ci an Optical Relay Satellite Using Reed-Solomon Coding Over a Cascaded Optical PPM and BPSK Channel D. Divsalar Communications Systems Research Section F. Naderi Telecommunications

IO0

10-1

10-2

IO-^

IO-'

a z - 104

13-11

Io-'

10-2

4 ; lo-'

n z - 10-8

DO*N LlNh S N R idBl

126

Page 11: BPSK - NASA ci an Optical Relay Satellite Using Reed-Solomon Coding Over a Cascaded Optical PPM and BPSK Channel D. Divsalar Communications Systems Research Section F. Naderi Telecommunications

ORIGINAL PACE IS OF POOR QUALITY

\

IO-'

10-2

IO-*

5 5 m IOd

IO-'

- 10'8

IO-^

1O'lO

a e a Y

0 z

0 z

lo-'?

127

Page 12: BPSK - NASA ci an Optical Relay Satellite Using Reed-Solomon Coding Over a Cascaded Optical PPM and BPSK Channel D. Divsalar Communications Systems Research Section F. Naderi Telecommunications

a E 9 f n

10-8

IO-^

10-10

1 10-1'

4 5 6 3 0 W N L I N K SNR (dB) D O W N L I N K S N R (db)

Page 13: BPSK - NASA ci an Optical Relay Satellite Using Reed-Solomon Coding Over a Cascaded Optical PPM and BPSK Channel D. Divsalar Communications Systems Research Section F. Naderi Telecommunications

D O W N LIr4K SNR (del

104

IC!

10-5 -

J c- 10-6 LD 0 2 ; lo-?

0

lo-E

IO-^ .

10-10

\a-11

10'1

10-2

10-3

P 10 1 1 12 1 5 6 7 8

D O W N L I N K S N R (d8)

129

Page 14: BPSK - NASA ci an Optical Relay Satellite Using Reed-Solomon Coding Over a Cascaded Optical PPM and BPSK Channel D. Divsalar Communications Systems Research Section F. Naderi Telecommunications

ORIGINAL PAGE IS OF POOR QlJALm

lo”

10-2

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 D O W N L I N K SNR (de) D O W N L I N K SNR (de)

I30

Page 15: BPSK - NASA ci an Optical Relay Satellite Using Reed-Solomon Coding Over a Cascaded Optical PPM and BPSK Channel D. Divsalar Communications Systems Research Section F. Naderi Telecommunications

ORIGINAL FAZE IS Of POOR QUALITY

10-1

10-2

1 0-3

10'4

0

IO4 f

1 o - ~

10- IO

lo-11

lO"2 4 5 6 7 8 P IO 1 1 12

DOWN L I N K S N R (d81

a 5 g IO-' a 2

10-8

1 o - ~

lo-lo

10-1' 1HRESHOLD 7 = 0

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 I 1 I ? DOWN LINK S N R (dB)

131


Recommended