+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Eeweb Pulse 2012 40

Eeweb Pulse 2012 40

Date post: 05-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: bomezzz-enterprises
View: 225 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 24

Transcript
  • 7/31/2019 Eeweb Pulse 2012 40

    1/24

    PULSE

    EEWeb.c

    Issue

    April 3, 20

    Dave BaarmanFulton Innovation

    Electrical Engineering Commun

    EEWeb

  • 7/31/2019 Eeweb Pulse 2012 40

    2/24

    Contact Us For Advertising Opportunities

    [email protected]

    www.eeweb.com/advertising

    Electrical Engineering CommunityEEWeb

    http://bit.ly/kDYHm7http://bit.ly/kDYHm7http://bit.ly/kDYHm7http://bit.ly/kDYHm7http://bit.ly/kDYHm7http://bit.ly/kDYHm7http://bit.ly/kDYHm7http://bit.ly/kDYHm7http://bit.ly/kDYHm7http://bit.ly/kDYHm7
  • 7/31/2019 Eeweb Pulse 2012 40

    3/24EEWeb |Electrical Engineering Community Visit www.eeweb.com 3

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    Dave Baarman 4FULTON INNOVATION

    Featured Products 9

    Understanding Wireless Power - Part IBY DAVE BAARMAN AND JOSHUA SCHWANNECKE WITH FULTON INNOVATION

    A Simple Circuit to Generate Plus 18And Minus Supplies Using a Boost RegulatorBY DON LAFONTAINE WITH INTERSIL

    RTZ - Return to Zero Comic 23

    Interview with Dave Baarman - Director of Advanced Technologies

    With differing perceptions of wireless power demands among developers and consumers, itsimportant to find common ground for future wireless power solutions.

    See how using a boost converter can help you get larger supplies of both positive and negativevoltages within your circuit.

    11

  • 7/31/2019 Eeweb Pulse 2012 40

    4/24EEWeb |Electrical Engineering Community Visit www.eeweb.com 4

    INTERVIEW

    Fulton Innovationwater treatment system to eliminate6-log reduction or 8-log reductionof bacteria and viruses. It ended

    up becoming a flagship product for

    Amway.

    From developing that water

    treatment system, we created a very

    unique wireless power system that

    had a lot of versatility and was highlyresonant in the way that it would

    adapt and respond to environmental

    changes like temperature, space

    and pressure. It was then that we

    realized we really had a winning

    product.

    Can you tell us more aboutthe 400 patents you hold inwireless power technology?

    We began developing the watertreatment system and the wireless

    power system about 15 years ago

    and we saw a very open white-

    space of intellectual property

    in the patenting world. So we

    started patenting back then on

    this technology, and really havent

    stopped since. Actually, as it sits

    DaveBaarman

    Dave Baarman - Director of Advanced Technologies

    How did you get into electricalengineering and when didyou start?

    I always wanted to be an engineer.

    Much of my purpose revolves

    around being someone innovative

    and who can develop new products.

    I am very interested in research and

    developmentmy first job was

    actually in automotive research anddevelopment.

    I also have a very entrepreneurial

    mind. I started my own business,

    sold it, and became a consultant.

    I later got hired by Amway as a

    consultant to provide wireless

    power to a water treatment system.

    Out of that relationship, the eSpring

    water treatment system was born.

    We created a wireless-powered

    lamp system to be dropped into the

  • 7/31/2019 Eeweb Pulse 2012 40

    5/24EEWeb |Electrical Engineering Community Visit www.eeweb.com 5

    INTERVIEW

    right now, we have a portfolio of over

    700 patents pending or granted in

    just the wireless power space.

    Can you tell us about beinga founding member of theWireless Power Consortium?

    The goal of the Wireless Power

    Consortium is to establish Qi

    (pronounced chee) as the global

    standard for power rechargeable

    electronic products. It has more

    than 100 members including

    industry leaders in mobile phones,

    consumer electronics, batteries,

    semiconductors, components,

    wireless power technology, andinfrastructure such as wireless

    operators, furniture and automotive

    parts companies.

    Some member companies include

    Motorola, Samsung, Philips, Verizon

    Wireless, Texas Instruments, LG

    Electronics and many more. A full

    list of member companies can be

    found here.

    Fulton and the WPC believethat global standards are a vital

    step in driving widespread

    consumer adoption of wireless

    power, and opens up the door

    for full interoperability between

    device manufacturers and OEMs

    worldwide. Globally recognized

    standards give consumers

    confidence that their purchases

    will work with compatible devices,

    regardless of the brand.

    How does Qi certicationwork?

    We do Qi precertification for our

    partners. The actual certification

    is done by laboratories that are set

    up to do this type of testing through

    the WPC. It works out pretty nicely

    because once you become certified,

    they are deemed as interoperable,

    and you become part of the WPC

    and can put the Qi logo on your

    products, just like Bluetooth or Wi-

    Fi.

    Can you tell us more aboutFulton Innovation and thetechnology it is developing?

    Fulton Innovations goal is to

    commercializing new and innovative

    technologies that improve the way

    we live, work, and play. Fulton

    is working with a wide range of

    industry-leading companies to

    integrate wireless power technologyinto infrastructure and electronic

    devices enabling consumers to live

    a truly wireless life. Fulton Innovation

    was established in 2006 to advance

    wireless power technology, which

    was first developed in 1998 by

    parent company Alticor for its

    eSpring water purification system.

    The technology was further

    developed, branded, and officially

    launched as eCoupled technologyin 2007. Fulton licenses its eCoupled

    technology to manufacturers so they

    can incorporate eCoupled into their

    products.

    Can you tell us about theeCoupled intelligent wirelesspower project?

    eCoupled technology is intelligent

    wireless power based on inductive

    coupling that allows for safe andefficient power transfer without

    wires. eCoupled technology is

    based on the principle of near-

    field resonant magnetic induction.

    With magnetic induction, electricity

    travels via magnetic fields instead

    of through a physical connection

    of conductive materials like those

    found in a traditional power cord.

    Wireless power requires two coils:

    a power supply coil (usually in a

    surface or pad) and a receiving coil

    (in a device). A shared or coupledelectromagnetic field is generated

    when the power supply and

    receiving coils are positioned near

    each other, which then wirelessly

    transfers power to or charges the

    device.

    eCoupled technology uses this

    concept to eliminate the need

    for power cords. It creates an

    electromagnetic conduit, combined

    with an intelligent control system

    that constantly monitors the power

    flow to ensure optimal efficiency

    and safety.

    How did you and FultonInnovation get involved in thisproject?

    Fulton Innovation originally

    developed the concept of eCoupled

    wireless power in 1998 to solve a very

    real problemfinding a safe way topower a UV lamp in a water purifier.

    It was then that Fulton realized the

    true potential of wireless power and

    its broad applicability to virtually

    any electronic power system. Since

    then, Fulton has enhanced and

    developed the technology and is

    dedicated to commercializing new

    and innovative implementations of

    wireless power that improve the

    way we live, work, and play.

    How has this technology hada signicant impact on thewireless power industry?

    The Qi global low-power standard,

    set by the Wireless Power

    Consortium (WPC), includes

    elements of eCoupled technology.

    http://www.wirelesspowerconsortium.com/member-list/http://www.wirelesspowerconsortium.com/member-list/
  • 7/31/2019 Eeweb Pulse 2012 40

    6/24EEWeb |Electrical Engineering Community Visit www.eeweb.com 6

    INTERVIEW

    The Qi standard ensures full

    interoperability between devices

    and transmitters, regardless

    of brand. The Qi standard

    gives consumers flexibility and

    confidence in their technology

    purchase. Today, there are more

    than 100 Qi-certified devices on

    the market worldwide and the list

    is growing rapidly. Fulton, as a

    founding member of the WPC, is

    committed to advancing Qi as the

    standard with manufacturers and

    consumers to encourage wireless

    power industry growth.

    What Fulton Innovation clientsare using this technology?

    Fultons technology has been

    incorporated into scores of products

    from various manufacturers

    around the world. You can see

    our technology in the following

    products:

    Amway eSpring waterpurification system

    Samsung Droid Charge

    Motorola Droid 3

    Motorola Droid Bionic

    LG Revolution

    HTC Thunderbolt

    HTC Rezound

    HTC Incredible 2

    LG Charging Pad

    Pantech Breakout

    Motorola Droid 4

    Does your licensing involveproviding a developmentplatform for users to start usingthe eCoupled technology?

    This is a new science based on

    old physics. It has a new twist:

    multidimensional control. This

    means that we are maximizing

    physics in order to adapt to varying

    environmental conditions. So, when

    Fulton Innovationsgoal is to

    commercialize newand innovative

    technologies that

    improve the way welive, work, and play.

    we partner with a company, it

    is a true collaboration. What we

    are really selling is not just a

    technology; we are selling that

    knowledge to bring our partners

    up to speed to understand the

    state-of-the-art in a particular

    technological realm. We do this tocontribute to the understanding of

    state-of-the-art models, tools and

    equipment, space and relationships

    and electromagnetic fields and

    materials that help users see things

    in a dynamic environment that were

    not previously possible.

    Our patents are a progression of that

    knowledge, and our relationships

    are a technology transfer ofthat knowledge into a physical

    embodiment that enhances our

    customers products.

    Are there any certicationrequirements for productsto make sure there isnt anyinterference with the system?

    There are FCC, CISPR and IEC

    requirements associated with any

    electronics design. What weve

    done with the WPC is set up under

    a specific band where we have

    reference designs to meet the

    considerations and requirements

    that exist for various products.

    With the WPC, weve actually

    selected a specific frequency

    range in order to be able to meet

    the regulatory requirements for

    SAR exposure and insure that any

    products using the Qi standard

    are able to pass the strictest safety

    regulations. You can do some

    very interesting things balancingin between ICNIRP exposure

    guidelines. Our range allows us to

    do everything in the power range

    of automobiles all the way down to

    printed electronics.

    Is that safe?

    Just to give you an idea, a hairdryer

    generates more radiation than our

    power systems.

    How far away can a devicebe and still remain efcientwith power transfer?

    We can do relatively huge distances

    and still efficiently transfer wireless

    power. In space, you could do some

    very large distances. In a room with

    people in it, however, you are limited

    by SAR exposure and ICNIRP

    guidelines. We dont like to do huge

    distances in rooms because of the

    exposure to humans, so we have

    made a considerable effort to limit

    the distance between the appliance

    and the wireless power supply.

    We like the distance to be inches

    rather than feet. Although we have

    the ability, we have still chosen to

    try and limit the distances to limit

    exposure.

  • 7/31/2019 Eeweb Pulse 2012 40

    7/24EEWeb |Electrical Engineering Community Visit www.eeweb.com 7

    INTERVIEW

    Are you able to designdirectional antennas tocentralize where the power isbeing transferred?

    We have done some very interesting

    work with shaping electromagnetic

    fields. We call it selective saturation.

    We can actually put a radiator in a

    table and put laminate over that

    table with a shielding material.

    Then selectively, wherever you

    place your device, the field is

    opened to transfer power through

    the shielding material. It is very

    interesting because it allows for the

    opening of virtual holes where you

    want the power to be transferred.

    This year at the 2012 International

    Consumer Electronics Show (CES),

    we showed power through metal.

    We have designed an aluminum

    enclosure, and you can actually

    set your electronics on top of that

    product and it will charge.

    Do you help clients designand incorporate yourtechnology into theirproducts?

    Typically, yes. However, the process

    varies with each partner. Using

    a cell phone manufacturer as an

    example, we may or may not go

    through the process of using a

    license agreement because the

    client company might buy the

    semiconductors from another

    company (e.g., Texas Instruments)

    that is already a licensee of ours.The manufacturer might want to go

    through the process on its own and

    use parts from other companies, but

    still enlist our help with the product

    to make the design meet certain

    specifications and standards like

    size and efficiency. There also

    might be additional twists to the

    manufacturers desires such as

    incorporating another trademarked

    feature into the design.

    We then work together with the

    manufacturer to model, design,test, validate and make sure it is Qi

    compatible with the WPC. Doing all

    of these things is what allows other

    companies to use our technology in

    their products.

    Where can the eCoupledtechnology be used?

    There are almost no limits to where

    eCoupled can be used. Anywhere

    theres a traditional power cable,eCoupled can certainly replace

    it. We have shown examples of

    eCoupled in everything from kitchen

    appliances to vehicles. At last years

    Consumer Electronics Show, we

    demonstrated wirelessly charging

    a Tesla Roadster electric vehicle.

    eCoupled is flexible enough to be

    used in packaging or publishing.

    Using printed electronics, weve

    shown how wireless power canbe incorporated into packaging

    (we lit a cereal box so it flashed

    on a supermarket shelf), and at

    CES this year well be showing

    a similar example with a copy of

    Entertainment Weeklythat lights up

    and flashes while it sits on a stand.

    Regarding the technology,what frequency do youtypically use to transmit

    power?

    The technology is frequency-

    agnostic, which means that we

    can really tune to any frequency

    and utilize and maximize the

    relationships between transmitters

    and receivers.

    We can do that dynamically at

    about any frequency range, but

    with the WPC we operate between

    80 250kHz. We have done that

    very specifically for very specific

    reasons.

    What are you doing froma marketing standpoint toconvince companies toincorporate this technologyinto their next devices?

    Ten years ago, when we were

    pitching the capabilities of wireless

    power, the reactions were, Its

    impossible, It cant be done.

    People thought it would be

    inefficient and extremely expensive.Today, while it is a robust power

    supply, it is also more convenient

    to the consumer--it gets rid of a top-

    ten warranty and reliability issue

    by eliminating cords and cables

    that usually break, and it can be

    designed in ways that simply

    replace the current power supply

    and power management at very

    little additional cost, regardless of

    the power level.

    It has been a long road getting

    the consensus and understanding

    within the electronics arena. But we

    have been successfully doing it with

    over 100 companies in the WPC,

    and are finally nearing the tipping

    point where people are realizing the

    value in this technology.

    What is the overall target

    for Fulton Innovation for thewireless power industry?

    We want wireless power to become

    ubiquitous. Wed like to remove the

    final cable (power) so we can enjoy

    a truly wireless, mobile lifestyle.

  • 7/31/2019 Eeweb Pulse 2012 40

    8/24

    Avago Technologies new AEAT-6600

    Hall Eect Magnetic Encoder delivers optimal

    solutions for Robotic, Industrial and Medicalsystems designers.

    Worlds highest resolution

    16-bit absolute positiion through SSI

    Programmable Magnetic Rotary Encoder IC

    16-pin TSSOP package

    Power down mode

    New Encoder for theWorst Case Environments

    Avago Technologies Motion Control Products

    For more information and to request

    a free sample go to:

    www.avagotech.com/motioncontrol

    http://bit.ly/jpn9V5http://bit.ly/jpn9V5http://bit.ly/jpn9V5http://bit.ly/jpn9V5http://bit.ly/jpn9V5http://bit.ly/jpn9V5http://bit.ly/jpn9V5http://bit.ly/jpn9V5http://bit.ly/jpn9V5http://bit.ly/jpn9V5http://bit.ly/jpn9V5http://bit.ly/jpn9V5http://bit.ly/jpn9V5http://bit.ly/jpn9V5http://bit.ly/jpn9V5http://bit.ly/jpn9V5
  • 7/31/2019 Eeweb Pulse 2012 40

    9/24EEWeb |Electrical Engineering Community Visit www.eeweb.com 9

    FEATURED PROD UCTS

    3-W Class-D Amplier With Smart Gain

    The TPA2029D1 is a mono, filter-free Class-D audio power amplifier with

    dynamic range compression (DRC) and automatic gain control (AGC).

    It is available in a 1.63 mm x 1.63 mm WCSP package. The DRC/AGC

    function in the TPA2029D1 can be enabled and disabled. The DRC/AGCfunction is configured to automatically prevent distortion of the audio

    signal and enhance quiet passages that are normally not heard. The

    DRC/AGC is also configured to protect the speaker from damage at high power levels and compress the dynamic

    rangeofmusictofitwithinthedynamicrangeofthespeaker.TheTPA2029D1iscapableofdriving3Wat5Vinto4

    loador880mWat3.6Vinto8load.Thedevicefeaturesanenablepinandalsoprovidesthermalandshortcircuit

    protection. For more information, please click here.

    IN+

    IN-

    AGC1

    OUT+

    OUT-

    EN

    AGC2

    Class-D

    Modulator

    VolumeControl

    Dierential

    Input

    C IN

    1 F

    GPIOInterface

    Power

    Stage

    AGCReference

    PGND

    ReferencesPVDD

    AGC

    Processor Core Supply with I2C

    The TPS6236x are a family of high-frequency synchronous step down

    dc-dc converter optimized for battery-powered portable applications for

    a small solution size. With an input voltage range of 2.5V to 5.5V, common

    battery technologies are supported. The device provides up to 3A peak

    load current, operating at 2.5MHz typical switching frequency. The

    devices convert to an output voltage range of 0.77V to 1.4V (TPS62360/62)

    and 0.5V to 1.77V (TPS62361B/63), programmable via I2C interface in 10mV steps. Dedicated inputs allow fast

    voltage transition to address processor performance operating points. The TPS6236x supports low-voltage DSPs

    and processor cores in smart-phones and handheld computers including latest submicron processes. For more

    information, please click here.

    TPS6236x

    PGNDPGNDPGND

    AGND

    SWSW

    CPU

    10F

    0.1F

    SENSE-

    SENSE+

    VIN

    SCLSDA

    VSEL0VSEL1

    EN

    AVIN

    VDD

    2.5V .. 5.5V

    0.77V .. 1.4V (0.5

    TPS62360/62)V .. 1.77V (TPS62361B)1H

    10F

    becoming more prevalent, as they provide bi-directional communication and work through walls (no line-of-sight

    communication is required). Microchips remote-control demo is in the form factor of a wireless remote control, but

    it can also be used as a reference design to build any type of application that requires a graphical display, touchsensing, USB and/or wireless capability. The demo is supported by free source code that customers can use to

    customize for various graphical screens or touch-button scenarios. The MRF24J40 transceiver can be used with

    the 2.4 GHz RF4CE, ZigBee or MiWi protocols, depending upon the wireless needs of the end application. The

    demo showcases how a vivid color display application can use a low cost PIC24 MCU with integrated graphics

    driver, utilizing only the on-chip RAM to eliminate the cost of external memory.For more information, please click

    here.

    Demo Board - Touch, USB and Wireless

    Microchip Technology Inc., a leading provider of microcontroller, analog

    and Flash-IP solutions, announced the availability of its Remote Control

    Demo Board, which integrates graphics, touch sensing, USB, and

    wireless communications (ZigBee RF4CE). The board demonstrates a

    remote control populated with a PIC24FJ256DA210 MCU, 3.5 graphical

    TFT LCD display with resistive touch screen, capacitive touch keys with

    plastic overlay, MRF24J40 2.4 GHz transceiver and ZENA wireless

    adapter. Many consumer products now feature colorful graphical

    displays and touch capability. And, RF-based remote controls are

    http://www.ti.com/product/tpa2029d1http://www.ti.com/product/tps62363http://www.microchip.com/pagehandler/en-us/press-release/microchips-remote-control-demo.htmlhttp://www.microchip.com/pagehandler/en-us/press-release/microchips-remote-control-demo.htmlhttp://www.ti.com/product/tps62363http://www.ti.com/product/tpa2029d1
  • 7/31/2019 Eeweb Pulse 2012 40

    10/24

    1.800.574.2791

    EEWeb

    Contact Us For Advertising Opportunities

    [email protected]

    www.eeweb.com/advertising

    Electrical Engineering Community

    http://bit.ly/l6u6Cxhttp://bit.ly/l6u6Cxhttp://bit.ly/l6u6Cxhttp://bit.ly/l6u6Cxhttp://bit.ly/l6u6Cxhttp://bit.ly/l6u6Cxhttp://bit.ly/l6u6Cxhttp://bit.ly/l6u6Cx
  • 7/31/2019 Eeweb Pulse 2012 40

    11/24EEWeb |Electrical Engineering Community Visit www.eeweb.com 11

    Wireless power is transitioning

    from a technology to an industry.

    Many questions ranging from whatconsumers really expect to which

    technology is the safest and most

    efficient solution are generating

    an increasing amount of debate

    as proprietary products come

    to market and a wireless power

    standard is introduced. As wireless

    power reaches a tipping point,

    it is important that developers

    and consumers alike understand

    the realities of the different

    technological approaches

    especially the safety and efficiency

    concerns surrounding themand

    the current and future states of the

    technology as it gains momentum.

    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    Research has shown that wireless

    power is one of the most attractive

    new technologies to consumers.

    However, there are misconceptionsin the media and the marketplace

    about what consumers really expect

    from the technology. In order for

    the industry to fully develop and

    reach mass adoption, there needs

    to be a fuller understanding of the

    different embodiments of wireless

    power technology, as well as

    clearer definitions of efficiency

    (in particular, how efficiency is

    measured), safety and the different

    consumer embodiments of the

    technology, including pad and

    adapter solutions and a wireless

    power specification.

    Given these considerations

    the viability of the technology

    and the growing wireless power

    industryit has become necessary

    to collectively understand and

    educate developers and consumers

    and collaborate to create the bestavailable solution for today and

    best position wireless power for its

    future.

    UNDERSTANDING

    WHAT CONSUMERS

    REALLY EXPECT

    Research has shown that a desire

    to simplify powering and charging

    experiences and add a new level

    of convenience to everyday life are

    driving the consumer expectation

    for wireless power. As the latest

    wave of wireless power products

    enter the marketplace and the

    viability of the technology expands

    into industry, a need to address the

    understanding of wireless power

    and how it will be incorporated into

    Dave BaarmanDirector OfAdvanced Technologies

    UnderstandingWirelessPowerPART 1

    Joshua SchwanneckeResearchScientist

  • 7/31/2019 Eeweb Pulse 2012 40

    12/24EEWeb |Electrical Engineering Community Visit www.eeweb.com 12

    TECHNICAL ARTICLE

    everyday life has also arisen.

    There has been a level of

    misunderstanding about what

    the consumer really wants and

    needs. Research has shown that ifconsumers knew that an integrated

    wireless power solution was going

    to be offered in the future, they would

    support a pad and adapter solution

    today. Nearly half of consumers

    surveyed indicated that they would

    wait two years for a product if they

    could have the technology built

    into electronic devices. Still, about

    one-third would be willing to buy

    adapters, and about one-quarterwould buy the standalone charger

    (pad) and use them until they

    replace their devices with ones with

    embedded technology [1].

    However, this research also

    indicates that there is a specific

    price point that, once exceeded, no

    longer makes the adaptive solution

    attractive, even to early adopters.

    Also, given the size of the adapter

    market in light of the larger pictureof all consumer electronics and

    infrastructure, it is not reasonable

    to think that proprietary charging

    pads and adapters are anything

    more than short-term options

    that will help prepare consumers

    for the universal, integrated,

    globally-available solution they are

    expecting.

    Given this understanding

    of the marketplace, many

    underdeveloped and divergent

    thoughts have been introduced

    from both the developmental and

    perceived consumer points of view.

    These range from broadcasting

    power and charging any device,

    in any position, anywhere in a

    room, to leveraging near-field

    solutions where devices interact

    with charging hot spots built into the

    surrounding infrastructure.

    As the industry matures and more

    specific questions and concernsaround wireless power technology

    develop along with it, there is a

    necessary sequence of events that

    is required for mass adoption of the

    technology worldwide. The first of

    these is a deeper understanding

    of the available technologies,

    their strengths and limitations

    and the importance of creating

    a global standard to serve as

    the most effective vehicle for theevolution of the universal wireless

    power solutions that is capable of

    answering the consumer demand

    for a universal, integrated solution.

    A simple assumption would be that

    consumers want wireless power in

    the same vein as Wi-Fi solutions

    where power would be available

    anywhere. Initially, this holds true

    until the aspects of efficiency,

    safety, cost and interoperabilityweigh into the equation. This then

    becomes a complex consideration

    of solutions. This is the underlying

    reason to further discuss these

    considerations, compromises and

    available solutions.

    THE PRIMARY

    EMBODIMENTS OF

    CONSUMER-READY

    WIRELESS POWER

    Wireless power can be transferred a

    number of ways. From microwaves

    and lasers, to the way Tesla did

    it, to simple embodiments like

    rechargeable toothbrushes--

    all these methodologies have

    limitations that potentially

    undermine mass adoption and

    commercialization. As an opening

    caveat, microwave and laser-type

    wireless power systems that are

    typically point-to-point sources have

    been excluded from this discussion.

    That said, development teams are

    stretching the boundaries of physics

    using available components to

    create systems that are able to

    compete with the efficiencies of

    wired solutions while offering

    the conveniences of wire-free

    connections. The solutions being

    offered currently are based on high-

    frequency broadcast, mid-range

    inductive coupling or near-field

    inductive coupling technologies.Other terms like magnetic

    resonance may be used, but think

    of this in terms of a very well-tuned

    and possibly larger inductively

    coupled transmitter and receiver

    system that can be configured and

    enabled in various ways.

    Several terms are used in defining

    inductive wireless power transfer,

    including magnetic coupling,

    where wireless power transfer

    is typically near-field inductive

    coupling. When discussing terms

    like non-radiated energy, this would

    assume magnetic coupling or, more

    specifically, inductive coupling.

    This can refer to both near-field and

    mid-range inductive coupling. This

    discussion defines these systems

    as near-field and those that use a

    larger primary coil for mid-range

    distances as near-field, far-edge.In addition, mid-range is defined

    as somewhere between one and

    ten times the diameter of the

    transmitting coil.

    Far-field is typically radio frequency

    (RF) and has a lower wavelength with

    a smaller antenna and propagates

  • 7/31/2019 Eeweb Pulse 2012 40

    13/24EEWeb |Electrical Engineering Community Visit www.eeweb.com 13

    TECHNICAL ARTICLE

    effectively. This discussion also

    reviews the considerations of these

    systems for use and integration. As

    a general term, both RF and mid-

    range wireless power are defined

    here as broadcast power systems,

    where the range invokes additional

    considerations in field, susceptibility

    and coverage in both radiated and

    non-radiated terms. The basic term

    broadcast for discussion is in a

    one-to-many relationshipthat is to

    say, one transmitter coil providing

    power to many receiver coils. In

    these broadcast relationships, the

    design requires every receiver in

    the system to suffer the differencefrom the most demanding

    requirement on the system. This

    will typically be expressed as

    losses in the transmitter and

    receiver. In broadcast systems, the

    consideration of the one-to-many

    relationship is very interesting;

    however, it brings many additional

    demands on both sides of the

    power system. On the receiver side,

    it demands that any device has theprotection and limiting of the largest

    device. This places very interesting

    and challenging requirements

    on the receivers to manage these

    voltages and power transactions.

    Although technology has advanced

    in DC-to-DC conversion, the

    efficiency of such systems will be

    challenged. Other factors include

    extraneous losses in the field and

    other parasitic elements. With

    close proximity systems, these

    can be easily managed. Each

    power channel delivers only what

    is requested for peak efficiency

    which, in turn, limits losses.

    Another key challenge is controlling

    in various modes with broadcast

    power. Consider the option to run as

    a battery charger, power supply or

    fast rate charger. A difficult problem

    for the one-to-many broadcast

    power system is managing powersupply interactions, as seen in

    Figure 1, along with meeting the

    time-dependent requirements of a

    demanding power system.

    It would be reasonable to think

    that for most broadcast systems

    the solution is one output and one

    charging solution, resulting in more

    waste. It is also important to point

    out that batteries are typically more

    forgiving than power systems. Withcloser proximity systems, scalable

    power from one transmitter over

    many control modes has been more

    easily demonstrated. This problem

    appears to be very challenging

    in broadcast power and may limit

    applications and interoperability.

    Figure 1: The power supply management demands of a basic 45 watt laptop power supplyfrom start up charging only, power and charging.

    MID-RANGE

    WIRELESS POWER

    Mid-range wireless power, as

    defined here, is wireless power thatextends to larger areas of influence.

    Mid-range wireless power is built

    around the idea of using resonant

    magnetic induction or near-field,

    far-edge to send power between

    coils across distances from

    several inches to several feet. The

    limitations of this concept start

    with the diameter of the transmitter.

    Typically, an inductive coupled

    system can transmit roughly thediameter of the transmitter. With

    additional tuning of the primary and

    secondary Q along with impedance

    matching capacitance or inductance

    to achieve a matched magnetic

    resonance, these distances

    can be extended. To date, the

    publications and experimentation

  • 7/31/2019 Eeweb Pulse 2012 40

    14/24EEWeb |Electrical Engineering Community Visit www.eeweb.com 14

    TECHNICAL ARTICLE

    show highly tuned systems that can

    transmit power over substantial

    distances with transmitter and

    receiver diameters that are larger

    than many consumer electronic

    devices. This tuning and the use

    of well-engineered low-loss coils

    in turn allow these distances to be

    extended. It should be noted that the

    discussion to date has been about

    extending distance and efficiency

    to ratios greater than four times the

    diameter of the transmitter. This

    is not to say that it will necessarily

    produce high efficiency, but rather

    that power can be transferred at this

    distance. For many, this will be moreinteresting at shorter distances

    where efficiencies are higher and

    suitable distances for specific

    applications are gained. This

    allows gains that create exciting

    opportunities but again benefit the

    closer proximity applications the

    most by extending distances and

    maintaining the highest efficiencies.

    The opportunities in this range are

    exciting but require additionalconsiderations.

    In reviewing the case of early RF

    wireless home control technologies

    that attempted to leverage the same

    thinking, these systems were tested

    in situations where significant gaps

    in coverage and limiting factors like

    aluminum siding were discovered

    that created additional consumer

    confusion and cost. Imagine these

    power transfer coils on the insidewall of a house with aluminum

    siding. This places a large coil

    within six inches of a metal surface.

    This is not an easy solution as the

    screen that holds plaster or stucco

    would present the same challenges

    to an RF-based power solution.

    Broadcast wireless power faces the

    same probable set of challenges,

    the most significant of which is

    consumer education. Today, this

    technology has been presented in a

    way that appears to be magic while

    the real comparisons will be made

    by the designers of future products.

    Wireless-powered devices can be

    very finely tuned and operate at

    specific frequencies. If a device,

    printed circuit, semiconductor or

    wire circuit happen to be tuned

    to these frequencies, they will

    suddenly develop a potential from

    the power being broadcasted. This

    opens up channels of interferencethat threaten efficiencies as well as

    functionality, creating usage issues

    for consumers. And, as distances

    between power sources and

    devices increase, these issues are

    amplified beyond simple shielding

    solutions. Additionally, wireless

    power in larger areas may present

    susceptibility and compatibility

    issues with devices. This may

    create a need for regulation and

    standardization that would require

    new levels of testing and design

    for devices to prevent additional

    reliability and warranty failures.

    Potential susceptibility failures

    can be immediate or latent failure

    modes.

    In reviewing the claims of non-

    radiated energy by some, one

    could see how it is more directed

    as in magnetic fields, but a specificenergy is still present at the transmit

    frequency within that field. This is

    typically strongest between these

    coils. It should be noted that this

    can be minimized but a component

    of radiated and non-radiated energy

    will be present.

    Orientation provides yet another

    challenging factor for broadcast

    power as distance increases. With

    this, consideration must be given

    to not only the physical orientation

    and alignment between the

    specific transmitter and receiver,

    but also orientation and alignment

    in conjunction with other bodies

    of various materials that fall within

    the broadcast field. If this condition

    happens to restrict the field

    completely, the consumer is left with

    a dead spot. These circumstances

    will change performance and

    operation unless the system can

    adjust and respond accordingly.

    This becomes even more importantwhen considering efficiencies in

    a highly tuned system. Adaptive

    intelligent solutions can provide

    gains in performance when facing

    these issues. However, if adaptive

    intelligence is not built into systems

    at the outset, the system risks

    potential technology failures and

    reduced consumer confidence.

    In addition to tuning and orientation

    challenges, mid-range wireless

    power solutions face coil geometry

    factors that should also be

    considered. The laws of physics

    have proven that well-matched coils

    provide the best power transfer.

    Referencing a recent paper by

    researchers at Koninklijke Philips

    Electronics N.V., one can see the

    possible practical applications

    using these methods [2]. All

    efficiencies referenced in thefollowing efficiencies section of this

    paper also consider tightly matched

    transmitter and receiver coils.

    Subsequent demonstrations have

    been realized with vastly different

    ratios from the transmitter diameter

    to receiver diameter. It should be

    pointed out that these efficiencies

  • 7/31/2019 Eeweb Pulse 2012 40

    15/24EEWeb |Electrical Engineering Community Visit www.eeweb.com 15

    TECHNICAL ARTICLE

    may follow some portion of these

    ratios. This may further degrade

    the efficiency references provided

    below for these systems as these

    ratios are changed from the

    mentioned efficiency. The example

    that follows uses a transmitter and

    receiver each with a 25cm coil, and

    this system demonstrates an AC

    system efficiency of 15 percent.

    By changing the receiver coil

    from 25cm to 25mm (a typical size

    needed for a handheld device)

    there should be a negative impact in

    efficiency. It would also be expected

    that any change in coil size would

    negatively impact tuning, so thissystem would need to be highly

    tuned as the system changes. Given

    these variables, there is opportunity

    for more system inefficiency at the

    system level when considering

    interoperability than has been

    communicated previously.

    Another consideration with mid-

    range wireless power systems is

    power control. When powering a

    laptop, a headset and cell phone,

    the power transmitted must be

    tailored to the highest demand. The

    other devices must be designed

    to either accommodate this input

    amplitude or other tradeoffs must

    be made. This represents yet

    another opportunity for losses,

    leading to overall lower efficiency

    and potentially greater thermal

    dissipation in the device. This

    also represents additional designconsiderations and protections

    for smaller devices that already

    struggle to reach their high level of

    integration.

    Appendix

    1. AcuPOLL Research, Inc.,

    August 2008 Project Alamo

    River

    2. Eberhard Waffenschmidt and

    Toine Staring, Limitation of in-

    ductive power transfer for con-

    sumer applications, Submittedas synopsis to European Power

    Electronics (EPE) Conference

    2009, Barcelona, Spain, 8-10

    September, 2009.

    3. AIP Industrial Physics Forum

    (November 13, 2006). Retrieved

    from: http://powercastco.com/

    PDF/HarvesterDataSheetv2.pdf

    4. Aristeidis Karalis,

    J.D.Joannopoulos, and MarinSoljacic (2006). Wireless Non-

    Radiative Energy Transfer.

    5. AIP Industrial Physics Forum

    (November 13, 2006). Retrieved

    from: http://powercastco.com/

    PDF/HarvesterDataSheetv2.pdf

    6. Hadley, Franklin (Version from

    November 19, 2008).Retrieved

    from: http://web.mit.edu/isn/

    newsandeven ts /wire less_power.html

    7. Eberhard Waffenschmidt and

    Toine Staring, Limitation of in-

    ductive power transfer for con-

    sumer applications, Submitted

    as synopsis to European Power

    Electronics (EPE) Conference

    2009, Barcelona, Spain, 8-10

    September, 2009.

    8. Hadley, Franklin (Version fromNovember 19, 2008). Retrieved

    from: http://web.mit.edu/isn/

    newsandeven ts /wire less_

    power.html

    9. Intel Labs (Accessed Octo-

    ber 2009). Wireless Resonant

    Energy Link. Retrieved from:

    http://seattle.intel-research.net/

    research.php#wrel

    10. Eberhard Waffenschmidt and

    Toine Staring, Limitation of in-

    ductive power transfer for con-sumer applications, Submitted

    as synopsis to European Power

    Electronics (EPE) Conference

    2009, Barcelona, Spain, 8-10

    September, 2009.

    11. http://www.ecoupled.com

    12. Eberhard Waffenschmidt and

    Toine Staring, Limitation of in-

    ductive power transfer for con-

    sumer applications, Submittedas synopsis to European Power

    Electronics (EPE) Conference

    2009, Barcelona, Spain, 8-10

    September, 2009.

    13. http://www.wirelesspowercon-

    sortium.com

    14. Aristeidis Karalis,

    J.D.Joannopoulos, and Marin

    Soljacic (2006). Wireless Non-

    Radiative Energy Transfer.

    About the Authors

    DAVID W BAARMAN

    David Baarman is the Director of

    Advanced Technologies at Fulton

    Innovation and the lead inventor

    of eCoupled intelligent wireless

    power technology. Mr. Baarman

    is responsible for the technical

    supervision and development ofeCoupled technology and other

    Fulton Innovation technologies. Mr.

    Baarman joined Amway in 1997,

    where he first pioneered the use of

    intelligent inductive coupling in the

    eSpring Water Purifier. With over

    20 years of leadership experience in

    the development of consumer and

    http://powercastco.com/PDF/HarvesterDataSheetv2.pdfhttp://powercastco.com/PDF/HarvesterDataSheetv2.pdfhttp://powercastco.com/PDF/HarvesterDataSheetv2.pdfhttp://powercastco.com/PDF/HarvesterDataSheetv2.pdfhttp://web.mit.edu/isn/newsandevents/wireless_power.htmlhttp://web.mit.edu/isn/newsandevents/wireless_power.htmlhttp://web.mit.edu/isn/newsandevents/wireless_power.htmlhttp://web.mit.edu/isn/newsandevents/wireless_power.htmlhttp://web.mit.edu/isn/newsandevents/wireless_power.htmlhttp://web.mit.edu/isn/newsandevents/wireless_power.htmlhttp://seattle.intel-research.net/research.php#wrelhttp://seattle.intel-research.net/research.php#wrelhttp://www.ecoupled.com/http://www.wirelesspowerconsortium.com/http://www.wirelesspowerconsortium.com/http://www.wirelesspowerconsortium.com/http://www.wirelesspowerconsortium.com/http://www.ecoupled.com/http://seattle.intel-research.net/research.php#wrelhttp://seattle.intel-research.net/research.php#wrelhttp://web.mit.edu/isn/newsandevents/wireless_power.htmlhttp://web.mit.edu/isn/newsandevents/wireless_power.htmlhttp://web.mit.edu/isn/newsandevents/wireless_power.htmlhttp://web.mit.edu/isn/newsandevents/wireless_power.htmlhttp://web.mit.edu/isn/newsandevents/wireless_power.htmlhttp://web.mit.edu/isn/newsandevents/wireless_power.htmlhttp://powercastco.com/PDF/HarvesterDataSheetv2.pdfhttp://powercastco.com/PDF/HarvesterDataSheetv2.pdfhttp://powercastco.com/PDF/HarvesterDataSheetv2.pdfhttp://powercastco.com/PDF/HarvesterDataSheetv2.pdf
  • 7/31/2019 Eeweb Pulse 2012 40

    16/24EEWeb |Electrical Engineering Community Visit www.eeweb.com 16

    TECHNICAL ARTICLE

    industrial products, Mr. Baarman

    took the technology behind eSpring

    and developed it to power everyday

    technologies, including consumer

    electronics, with a diverse range

    of power needs. Mr. Baarmans

    efforts have led to national and

    global recognition of eCoupled

    technology and the acquisition of

    former competitor, Splashpower, in

    May 2008. Mr. Baarman has more

    than 700 U.S. and foreign patents

    that are granted or pending.

    JOSHUA SCHWANNECKE

    Joshua Schwannecke is a Research

    Scientist with the Advanced

    Technologies Group at Fulton

    Innovation. Josh has more than fiveyears of experience with wireless

    power and developing solutions

    using eCoupled technology. He has

    developed wireless power solutions

    for the Amway eSpring Water

    Purifier and other devices including

    hearing aids, phones, headsets,

    laptops, and power tools. He also

    works closely with Fultons partner

    companies to research wireless

    power solutions for prototype

    products. Mr. Schwannecke holds

    a Masters in Electrical Engineering

    from Michigan State University and

    has received an excellence award

    for coil design and optimization. He

    holds one granted patent and has

    eight published patent applications.

    http://bit.ly/nKLRXohttp://bit.ly/nKLRXohttp://bit.ly/nKLRXohttp://bit.ly/nKLRXohttp://bit.ly/nKLRXohttp://bit.ly/nKLRXohttp://bit.ly/nKLRXo
  • 7/31/2019 Eeweb Pulse 2012 40

    17/24

    60V Fault Protected, 3.3V to 5V, 20V Common Mode

    Range, RS-485/RS-422 Transceivers with Cable Invert

    and 15kV ESD

    ISL32450E, ISL32452E, ISL32453E, ISL32455E, ISL32457EThe ISL32450E through ISL32457E are 3.3V to 5V powered, fault

    protected, extended common mode range differential transceivers

    for balanced communication. The RS-485 bus pins (driver outputs

    and receiver inputs) are protected against overvoltages up to

    60V, and against 15kV ESD strikes. These transceivers operate

    in environments with common mode voltages up to 20V

    (exceeds the RS-485 requirement), making this RS-485 family

    one of the more robust on the market.

    Transmitters are RS-485 compliant with VCC 4.5V and deliver a

    1.1V differential output voltage into the RS-485 specified 54

    load even with VCC = 3V.

    Receiver (Rx) inputs feature a Full Fail-Safe design, which

    ensures a logic-high Rx output if Rx inputs are floating, shorted, or

    on a terminated but undriven (idle) bus. Rx full fail-safe operation

    is maintained even when the Rx input polarity is switched (cable

    invert function on ISL32457E).

    The ISL32457E includes a cable invert function that reverses the

    polarity of the Rx and Tx bus pins in case the cable is

    misconnected during installation.

    See Table 1 on page 2 for key features and configurations by

    device number.

    Related Literature

    See FN7784, ISL32470E, ISL32472E, ISL32475E,ISL32478E: Fault Protected, Extended Common Mode Range,

    RS-485/RS-422 Transceivers with 16.5kV ESD

    Features Fault Protected RS-485 Bus Pins. . . . . . . . . . . . . Up to 60V

    Extended Common Mode Range . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20V

    Larger Than Required for RS-485

    15kV HBM ESD Protection on RS-485 Bus Pins

    Wide Supply Range . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3V to 5.5V

    Cable Invert Pin (ISL32457E Only)

    Corrects for Reversed Cable Connections While Maintaining Rx

    Full Fail-safe Functionality

    1/4 Unit Load for Up to 128 Devices on the Bus

    High Transient Overvoltage Tolerance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80V

    Full Fail-safe (Open, Short, Terminated) RS-485 Receivers

    Choice of RS-485 Data Rates . . . . . . . . . . . . 250kbps or 1Mbps

    Low Quiescent Supply Current . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.1mA

    Ultra Low Shutdown Supply Current . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10A

    Pb-Free (RoHS Compliant)

    Applications Utility Meters/Automated Meter Reading Systems

    Air Conditioning Systems

    Security Camera Networks

    Building Lighting and Environmental Control Systems

    Industrial/Process Control Networks

    FIGURE 1. EXCEPTIONAL ISL32453E RX OPERATES AT >1Mbps

    EVEN WITH 20V COMMON MODE VOLTAGE

    FIGURE 2. TRANSCEIVERS DELIVER SUPERIOR COMMON MODE

    RANGE vs STANDARD RS-485 DEVICES

    TIME (200ns/ DIV)

    VO

    LTAGE(V)

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    B

    A

    RO

    VCC = 3V

    VID = 1V2Mbps

    ISL3245XE

    COMMO

    N

    MODERANGE(V)

    STANDARD RS-485TRANSCEIVER

    -20

    -7

    0

    12

    20

    February 20, 2012

    FN7921.0

    Intersil (and design) is a registered trademark of Intersil Americas Inc. Copyright Intersil Americas Inc. 2012

    All Rights Reserved. All other trademarks mentioned are the property of their respective owners.

    Get the Datasheet and Order Samples

    http://www.intersil.com

    http://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhBhttp://bit.ly/nHxRhB
  • 7/31/2019 Eeweb Pulse 2012 40

    18/24EEWeb |Electrical Engineering Community Visit www.eeweb.com 18

    Combining the operation of a boost regulator and a

    negative voltage converter can generate a negative

    supply from a single low-voltage supply. The circuitin Figure 5 shows a standard application circuit for a

    +20V supply along with two op amps, two diodes and

    two capacitors to generate the 20V supply. This article

    will discuss the basic operation of a boost converter to

    generate a larger positive supply voltage. Equations

    are derived to determine the minimum inductor value to

    maintain a safe peak inductor current, and a maximum

    inductor value to maintain continuous conduction mode

    (CCM) operation. The article will then discuss the

    generation of a negative supply and the restrictions of

    the design.

    Understanding the Boost Topology:

    Before we add the additional circuitry to generate the

    negative supply, it is important to understand how the

    boost convertor produces an output voltage that is

    always greater than the input voltage. In order to do this,

    we analyze the boost circuits in Figure 1 and the current

    waveforms in Figure 2. For this analysis, we account

    for all the losses in the charging and discharging loops

    in our equations. This should help to give a complete

    understanding of the circuit.

    However, the output voltage is not dependent upon any

    losses in the circuit. This is because all the losses are

    inside the circuits feedback loop of the ISL97701which

    we will use as an example hereand are automatically

    accounted for. The output voltage is defined from

    the feedback resistor network shown in Figure 5 and

    calculated in Equation 1, where VrefFB is the internal

    reference voltage of the ISL97701.

    ( )

    .( )

    ( )

    V V

    R

    R R

    V VR

    R R1 15 1

    OUT refFB

    OUT

    2

    1 2

    2

    1 2

    :

    :

    =+

    =+

    Positive Supply:

    Figure 6a shows the basic boost converter circuit.

    During one switching cycle, the transistor Q1 turns on

    and turns off. During the time Q1 is on, the inductor

    L1 is placed in series with the VIN supply through the

    Don LaFontaineSenior Application Engineer

    A Simple Circuit to GeneratePlus and Minus Supplies

    Using a Boost Regulator

    +++

  • 7/31/2019 Eeweb Pulse 2012 40

    19/24EEWeb |Electrical Engineering Community Visit www.eeweb.com 19

    TECHNICAL ARTICLE

    ISL97701s integrated boost FET (Q1). The diode D1 is

    reverse biased and the circuit reduces to that shown in

    Figure 6b. The voltage across the boost inductor (L1)

    is equal to VIN (VDS + IL1 x RL1) and the current

    ramps up linearly in inductor L1 to a peak value at time

    DT. Thepeak inductorcurrent (IL1) is calculated in

    Equation 3 and shown graphically in Figure 6b. Any

    load requirements during this phase are supplied by the

    output capacitor C1.

    The duty cycle (D) in Equation 5 is determined by setting

    the losses in Equation 5 (IL1 x RL1, VD1, VDS) to zero

    because they are within the feedback loop of the ISL97701.

    The ISL97701 varies the duty cycle continuously to keep

    Figure 1

    V Ldtdi

    iLV

    dt ( )2LL

    LpkL

    T

    DT

    0

    = = #

    When Q1 turns off, because the current in an inductor

    cannot change instantaneously, the voltage in L1 reverses

    and the circuit becomes that shown in Figure 1c. Now the

    no-dot end of L1 is positive with respect to the dot end

    and D1 becomes forward biased. Because the dot end is

    at VIN, L1 delivers its stored energy to C1 and charges it

    up to a higher voltage than VIN. This energy supplies the

    load current and replenishes the charge drained away

    from C1. During this time, energy is also supplied to the

    load from VIN. The voltage applied to the dot end of the

    inductor is (VIN IL1 x RL1), while the voltage applied

    to the no-dot end of L1 is now the output voltage (VO)

    plus the diode forward voltage (VD). The voltage across

    the inductor during the off-state is ((VO + VD1 + IL1 x

    RL1) VIN). The inductor current during the off-time of

    the switch (T-DT) is calculated in Equation 4 and shown

    graphically in Figure 1c.

    IL

    V (V I R )DT ( )3L1(on)

    IN DS L1 L1=

    - + ##D

    IL

    (V V I R ) V(T DT) ( )4L1(off)

    o D1 L1 L1 IN=

    + + --

    ##D

    In steady-state conditions, the current increases during

    the on-time of the switch and decreases during the off-time of the switch (Figure 7). Both on-time and off-time

    currents are equal to prevent the inductor core from

    saturating. Setting both currents equal to each other

    and solving for VO results in the continuous conduction

    mode boost voltage shown in Equation 5.

    V1 D

    V I R )V V

    1 DD

    ( )5oin L L

    D1 DS= -

    -- -

    -

    ##

    Figure 2

    RL1

    IL1

    RL

    L1 D1

    Q1C1

    IO

    VIN

    VDS

    +

    VO

    RL1

    IL1

    IQ1

    L1

    (VO+VD+IL1xRL)VIN(T-DT)

    L

    Q1VIN+

    RL1

    IL1

    RL

    L1 D1

    DT

    DTOT

    T

    VO

    C1

    VIN+

    IO

    a

    b

    a

    b

    IL1(of f) =

    (VIN(VDS+IL1xRL1))DT

    L

    IL1(on) =

    DTOT

    IL1

    IL1

    IL1(pk)

    IL1(a ve)

    ID1

    IQ1

    OT DT T

    OT DT T

    OT DT T

  • 7/31/2019 Eeweb Pulse 2012 40

    20/24EEWeb |Electrical Engineering Community Visit www.eeweb.com 20

    TECHNICAL ARTICLE

    VO constant, regardless of the conduction losses as

    a function of load current. With the losses set to zero,

    Equation 5 reduces to Equation 6. This results in the

    value for the duty cycle shown in Equation 7.

    the output current multiplied by the gain of the boost

    regulator as shown in Equation 10.

    VV

    1 D1 ( )6

    IN

    O=

    -

    D 1V

    V( )7

    O

    IN= -

    Inductor Selection

    The inductor selection determines the output ripple

    voltage, transient response, output current capability

    and efficiency. Its selection depends on the input

    voltage, peak inductor current, output voltage, switching

    frequency and maximum output current. When choosing

    an inductor, make sure the saturation current of theinductor is greater than the IPEAK of the circuit. Likewise,

    the transistor should be able to handle peak current

    greater than IPEAK. The peak inductor current is shown

    in Figure 10 and can be calculated using Equation 11.

    Figure 3

    From Figure 3, we can see that the peak inductor current

    IL1 is equal to the average inductor current IL1 plus one

    halftheIL1current,asshowninEquation8.

    I I21

    I ( )8L1(PEAK) L1(AVE) L1(ON)= + D

    The average power IN is equal to the average power

    OUT divided by the efficiency of the circuit, as shown inEquation 9.

    V IEff

    V I( )9IN L1 (AVE)

    O O=##

    Where Eff is equal to the efficiency of the ISL97701 boost

    regulator.

    Therefore, the average inductor current is equal to

    IV Eff

    V I( )10L1(AVE)

    IN

    O O=#

    #

    IL1wasdefinedinEquation3andthedutycycle(D)

    in Equation 7. Substituting Equation 7 into Equation

    3 and adding it to Equation 10 results in Equation 11.

    Equation 11 gives the inductors peak current in terms of

    input voltage, output voltage, switching frequency, and

    maximum output current (again, the losses due to VDS

    and IL1 x RL1 are not included because they are inside

    the feedback loop of the ISL97701).

    IV Eff

    V I1/2

    L V FREQ

    V (V V )( )11L(PEAK)

    IN

    O O

    O

    IN O I N+

    -

    =#

    #

    #

    # #

    #

    By rearranging the terms in Equation 11, we can solve

    for the inductor value using Equation 12.

    L(I V Eff I V )2V FREQ

    V Eff (V V )( )12

    PK IN O O O

    IN2

    O IN

    -

    -

    =

    Equation 12 is useful for determining the minimum

    value of L that the circuit can handle without exceeding

    the peak current through the inductor, and therefore the

    switch Q1. The maximum peak current (IPEAK) allowed

    through Q1 for safe operation is given in the electricaltable as 1.2A.

    Minimum Inductor Value Design Example

    Given: VIN = 5V, VO = 20V, IO = 50mA, IPK = 1.2A, freq

    = 1MHz, Eff = 0.85 (Efficiency of 85% from Figure 3 in

    the ISL97701 data sheet).

    Equation 12 gives us the boundary condition for the

    smallest inductor we can have to ensure the peak

    current through Q1 is less than the max limit of 1.2A.

    The minimum inductor value for the given conditions isdetermined to be 1.94H.

    1.94 H ( )13= n

    L(1.2A (5)(0.85) 50mA(20)) 2 (20) 1MHz

    (5V) (0.85)(20 5)2

    -

    -

    =

    Maintaining CCM Design Example

    For maximum efficiency, the boost converter needs to

    IL1

    IL1

    IL1(pk)

    IL1(a ve)

    O DT T

  • 7/31/2019 Eeweb Pulse 2012 40

    21/24EEWeb |Electrical Engineering Community Visit www.eeweb.com 21

    TECHNICAL ARTICLE

    Negative Supply

    The operation of the negative supply is best understood

    by considering Figure 5. We will start our analysis

    under steady state conditions (the inductor operating

    in continuous conduction mode and C1 is equal to thevoltage calculated in Equation 1).

    When Q1 turns off, the inductor voltage flies up turning

    on D1 and D3. Diode D2 is blocking current flow from

    C3. The inductor current now charges both capacitors

    C1 and C2 with the polarity shown in Figure 5. The

    voltage on C2 is equal to the voltage on C1 plus the

    forward voltage drop of D1.

    When Q1 turns on, Diodes D1 and D3 are blocking and

    capacitor C2 is now in parallel with capacitor C3 through

    D2 (which is now on), as seen in Figure 4. This connectionresults in a negative voltage being transferred on to C3.

    The voltage transferred to C3 is equal to the voltage on

    C1 as shown in Figure 4 and Equation 18.

    be operated in continuous conduction mode (CCM). To

    maintain continuous conduction mode operation of the

    boost regulator, the value of IL1 needs to be greater than

    orequaltoIL1/2(Figure3).

    I21 I

    V Eff

    V I1/2

    L V FREQ

    V (V V( )14

    L1(AVE) L1

    IN

    O O

    O

    IN O IN)-

    #

    #

    #

    # #

    #

    $

    $

    D

    Rearranging terms and solving for L results in Equation

    15.

    L 1/2

    V Eff

    V IV FREQ

    V (V V )(15)

    IN

    O OO

    IN O IN-

    #

    #

    #

    # #

    #

    $

    To maintain continuous conduction mode operation for

    the given circuit design conditions above, the value of L

    has to be greater than 7.96H.

    L 1/2

    5V (0.85)

    20V 50mA20 1MHz

    5V (20V 5V)-#

    #

    #

    # #

    #

    $

    7.96 H ( )16$ n

    It should be noted that when there is a light load, the circuit

    can slip into discontinuous conduction mode, where the

    inductor becomes fully discharged of its current each

    cycle. This operation will reduce the overall efficiency

    of the supply. Using Equation 15 and making the value

    of the inductor large enough for a given minimum

    output current will ensure continuous conduction mode

    operation.

    Output Capacitor

    Low ESR capacitors should be used to minimize the

    output voltage ripple. Multilayer ceramic capacitors

    (X5R and X7R) are preferred for the output capacitors

    because of their lower ESR and small packages.Tantalum capacitors with higher ESR can also be used.

    The output ripple can be calculated in Equation 17:

    Vf C

    I DI ESR ( )17O

    SW 1

    OUT

    OUT=#

    #

    #D +

    For noise sensitive applications, a 0.1F placed in

    parallel with the larger output capacitor is recommended

    to reduce the switching noise.

    Figure 4

    The efficiency of the charge transfer between the

    two capacitors is related to the energy lost during this

    process. Energy is lost only in the transfer of charge

    between capacitors if a change in voltage occurs. Theenergy lost is defined in Equation 19:

    (V D ) D V 0

    V V

    ( )18C1 1 2 C3

    C1 C3

    + - - =

    =

    E21

    C (V V ) ( )192 12

    2

    2-=

    Where V1 and V2 are the voltages on C2 during the

    charging and transfer cycles. If the impedances of

    C2 and C3 are relatively high at the 1MHz frequency

    compared to the value of RL, there will be substantial

    +

    +

    +

    C2

    V = VC1 +D1

    Q1 turns on connecting

    C2 to ground as shown

    VC3

    C3

    C1

    D1

    D2

  • 7/31/2019 Eeweb Pulse 2012 40

    22/24EEWeb |Electrical Engineering Community Visit www.eeweb.com 22

    TECHNICAL ARTICLE

    difference in the voltages V1 and V2. Therefore it is

    not only desirable to make C3 as large as possible to

    eliminate output voltage ripple, but also to employ a

    correspondingly large value for C2 in order to achieve

    maximum operation efficiency.

    Output Voltage Regulation Using Op Amps

    The final output voltage regulation is accomplished

    using the ISL28208 Dual Opamp. The voltage developed

    by the boost converter powers the amplifiers and the

    output voltage is calculated using Equations 20 and 21.

    currents between 25mA and 125mA. The circuit will

    work perfectly fine outside these ranges, as long as the

    maximum IPEAK current is not exceeded (Equation 12).

    The only drawback will be a reduction in the efficiency

    of the circuit. The percent efficiency could drop fromthe 80s to the 60s as the operation goes from continuous

    conduction mode to discontinuous conduction mode.

    Reference the ISL97701 data sheet for additional

    information on performance.

    About the Author

    Don LaFontaine is a Sr. Principal Application Engineer/

    Sr. Engineering Manager with Intersils Analog/Mixed

    Signal product line in Palm Bay, Florida. His focus is on

    precision analog products. He has been with Intersil

    Corp. for the last 30 years. He graduated from theUniversity of South Florida with a BSEE in 1985.

    V 5V (R R ) /R ( )20OUT(positive) 3 4 3:= +

    V V R /R ( )21OUT (negative) OUT (positive) 6 5= :-

    Restriction On DesignFor reasonable voltage regulation of the negative supply

    voltage, the negative supply current needs to be less than

    or equal to the positive supply current. This is because

    the control loop for output voltage regulation is around

    the positive supply voltage only.

    I I ( )22OUT(positive) OUT(negative)$

    The ISL97701 is optimized to work best for a small

    range of inductors. The slope compensation ramp

    generator, inside the ISL97701, is optimized for inductorvalues between the range of 4.7H to 15H and output

    Figure 5

    EEWebElectrical Engineering CommunityJoin Today

    www.eeweb.com/register

    C2

    C3

    C1

    C0

    VOUT(positive)

    VOUT

    FB

    ISL97701

    ISL28108

    ISL28108

    VDDOUT

    VDD

    NEN

    NSYNC

    GND

    LX20V

    VOUT(negative)

    - 20V

    4.7F6.8H

    4.7F

    4.7F

    R1383k

    R2

    R3

    22.2k

    33.2k

    R4

    100k

    R5

    100k

    R6

    100k

    5F

    - 20.99V

    5V

    5V

    V+

    V

    V+

    V

    5V

    20.99V

    L1

    Q1

    D2

    D1 V0

    D3

    +

    +

    +

    +

    +

    O

    SCILLATOR

    AN

    DCONTROL

    http://bit.ly/jd6Wcwhttp://bit.ly/jd6Wcwhttp://bit.ly/jd6Wcwhttp://bit.ly/jd6Wcwhttp://bit.ly/jd6Wcwhttp://bit.ly/jd6Wcwhttp://bit.ly/jd6Wcwhttp://bit.ly/jd6Wcwhttp://bit.ly/jd6Wcwhttp://bit.ly/jd6Wcwhttp://bit.ly/jd6Wcwhttp://bit.ly/jd6Wcw
  • 7/31/2019 Eeweb Pulse 2012 40

    23/24EEWeb |Electrical Engineering Community Visit www.eeweb.com 23

    RETURN TO ZERO

  • 7/31/2019 Eeweb Pulse 2012 40

    24/24

    RETURN TO ZERO

    http://bit.ly/zVvNIs

Recommended