+ All Categories
Home > Documents > EFFECTS OF BOUNDARY CONDITIONS ON MPS · Determination of calorific value” ... to achieve...

EFFECTS OF BOUNDARY CONDITIONS ON MPS · Determination of calorific value” ... to achieve...

Date post: 30-Jan-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 3 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
13
Climbing higher. Together. © Diehl Aviation EFFECTS OF BOUNDARY CONDITIONS ON MPS TESTING Karsten Kirbach Research Systems 2019 May 14th
Transcript
  • Climbing higher.

    Together.

    © Diehl Aviation

    EFFECTS OF BOUNDARY CONDITIONS ON MPS

    TESTINGKarsten Kirbach

    Research Systems2019 May 14th

  • 2Titel der Präsentation, Abteilungskürzel, StandVertraulich C0-C3, © Diehl Stiftung & Co. KG

    2Folienmaster, Communications & PR, 09/2018

    © Diehl Aviation2© DIEHL AVIATION

    Motivation

    • For development and certification of a halon replacement fire suppression system extensive testing in alignment with the MPS is necessary.

    • Reference for testing and test results is the MPS Test Article at the FAA Technical Center.

    • To achieve a high comparability a replica test article needs to be as similar as possible to the FAA MPS Test Article.

    • The Minimum Performance Standard for Aircraft Cargo Compartment Halon Replacement Fire Suppression Systems is giving guidelines to build a replica test article, however some boundary conditions may not be defined in sufficient detail to achieve comparability.

    EFFECTS OF BOUNDARY CONDITIONS ON MPS

  • 3Titel der Präsentation, Abteilungskürzel, StandVertraulich C0-C3, © Diehl Stiftung & Co. KG

    3Folienmaster, Communications & PR, 09/2018

    © Diehl Aviation3© DIEHL AVIATION

    GUIDELINES GIVEN BY THE MPS

    “The fire load […] consists of single-wall corrugated cardboard boxes, […] of 18 by 18 by 18 inches (45.7 by 45.7 by 45.7 cm). The weight per unit area of the cardboard is 0.11 lb/ft2 (0.5417 kg/m2).”

    “The boxes are filled with 2.5 pounds (1.1 kg) of loosely packed standard weight office paper shredded into strips (not confetti).”

  • 4Titel der Präsentation, Abteilungskürzel, StandVertraulich C0-C3, © Diehl Stiftung & Co. KG

    4Folienmaster, Communications & PR, 09/2018

    © Diehl Aviation4© DIEHL AVIATION

    Shredded Paper

    CALORIFIC VALUE OFCOMMON MPS FIRE LOADS

    • Gross Calorific Value acc. DIN EN ISO 18125: 2017-08 „Solid biofuels -Determination of calorific value”

    • Samples are grinded down and burnedwithin a bomb calorimeter

    • Samples FAA 1 and FAA 2 provided byDhaval Dadia

    • Up to 20% difference in Gross CalorificValue

    75%

    80%

    85%

    90%

    95%

    100%

    105%

    110%

    115%

    FAA 1 FAA 2 sample No. 1 sample No. 2 sample No. 3

    Gro

    ss C

    alo

    rifi

    c V

    alu

    e

    Shredded Paper used for MPS testing

    water free

    conditioned

  • 5Titel der Präsentation, Abteilungskürzel, StandVertraulich C0-C3, © Diehl Stiftung & Co. KG

    5Folienmaster, Communications & PR, 09/2018

    © Diehl Aviation5© DIEHL AVIATION

    Cardboard Boxes

    CALORIFIC VALUE OFCOMMON MPS FIRE LOADS

    • Gross Calorific Value acc. DIN EN ISO 18125: 2017-08 „Solid biofuels -Determination of calorific value”

    • Samples are grinded down and burnedwithin a bomb calorimeter

    • Samples FAA 1 provided by Dhaval Dadia

    • Up to 16% difference in Gross CalorificValue

    75%

    80%

    85%

    90%

    95%

    100%

    FAA 1 sample No. 1 sample No. 2

    Gro

    ss C

    alo

    rifi

    c V

    alu

    e

    Cardboard Boxes used for MPS testing

    water free

    conditioned

  • 6Titel der Präsentation, Abteilungskürzel, StandVertraulich C0-C3, © Diehl Stiftung & Co. KG

    6Folienmaster, Communications & PR, 09/2018

    © Diehl Aviation6© DIEHL AVIATION

    Packed MPS Boxes

    CALORIFIC VALUE OFCOMMON MPS FIRE LOADS

    • Theoretical Gross calorific Value per packed MPS Box

    • Up to 13% difference in GrossCalorific Value

    • Samples FAA MPS Box 1 and FAA MPS Box 2 provided by DhavalDadia

    • Macroscopic combustion behavioris not considered!

    75%

    80%

    85%

    90%

    95%

    100%

    105%

    Gro

    ss C

    alo

    rifi

    c V

    alu

    e

    packed Boxes used for MPS testing

    water free

    conditioned

  • 7Titel der Präsentation, Abteilungskürzel, StandVertraulich C0-C3, © Diehl Stiftung & Co. KG

    7Folienmaster, Communications & PR, 09/2018

    © Diehl Aviation

  • 8Titel der Präsentation, Abteilungskürzel, StandVertraulich C0-C3, © Diehl Stiftung & Co. KG

    8Folienmaster, Communications & PR, 09/2018

    © Diehl Aviation8© DIEHL AVIATION

    GUIDELINES GIVEN BY THE MPS

    “The fire tests are conducted inside a. The volume of the compartment is 2000 ±100 cubic feet (56.6 ±2.8 m3) (see figure 1).”

  • 9Titel der Präsentation, Abteilungskürzel, StandVertraulich C0-C3, © Diehl Stiftung & Co. KG

    9Folienmaster, Communications & PR, 09/2018

    © Diehl Aviation9© DIEHL AVIATION

    1371 kg

    493 kg 477 kg

    0 kg

    350 kg

    700 kg

    1050 kg

    1400 kg

    1750 kg

    0,0 kJ/K

    150,0 kJ/K

    300,0 kJ/K

    450,0 kJ/K

    600,0 kJ/K

    750,0 kJ/K

    Galvanized SteelGA16

    Aluminium GA14 glassfiber reinforcedplastics

    The

    rmal

    Ma

    ss

    Mass Properties of Lining Materials

    Thermal Mass

    Lining Net Mass

    THERMAL PROPERTIES OF MPS TEST CELL LINING MATERIALS

    • Lining Material for MPS Test cell isnot specified

    • Up to 56% difference in thermal mass

    • Thermal mass may influence MPS results

    Possible effects:

    Damping of peak temperatures

    Increased thermal inertia of thetest setup

    Dhaval Dadia, Oct 31 2018 –

    Rebuild of the Cargo MPS Test Article

  • 10Titel der Präsentation, Abteilungskürzel, StandVertraulich C0-C3, © Diehl Stiftung & Co. KG

    10Folienmaster, Communications & PR, 09/2018

    © Diehl Aviation10© DIEHL AVIATION

    32,20E-06 K/W 9,87E-06 K/W000,00E+00 K/W

    2,00E-03 K/W

    4,00E-03 K/W

    6,00E-03 K/W

    8,00E-03 K/W

    Galvanized Steel GA16 Aluminium GA14 glassfiber reinforcedplastics

    The

    rmal

    Re

    sist

    ance

    pe

    r m

    ²

    Thermal Properties of Lining Materials

    THERMAL PROPERTIES OF MPS TEST CELL LINING MATERIALS

    • Lining Material for MPS Test cell is not specified

    • Several orders of magnitude difference in thermal conductivity and thus thermal resistance

    • Thermal conductivity and resistance may influence MPS results

    Possible effects:

    Faster/slower heat conduction through lining material

    In-/decreased convective cooling at exterior of test cell(depending on outside surface- and surrounding environmental temperatures)

    Increased susceptibillity for surrounding environmental conditions (e.g. temperature, airflow, …) if test cell lining isnot enclosed or insulated

    0,34 W/m*K0,00 W/m*K

    50,00 W/m*K

    100,00 W/m*K

    150,00 W/m*K

    200,00 W/m*K

    Galvanized Steel GA16 Aluminium GA14 glassfiber reinforced plastics

    The

    rmal

    Co

    nd

    uct

    ivit

    y

    Thermal Properties of Lining Materials

  • 11Titel der Präsentation, Abteilungskürzel, StandVertraulich C0-C3, © Diehl Stiftung & Co. KG

    11Folienmaster, Communications & PR, 09/2018

    © Diehl Aviation11© DIEHL AVIATION

    Karsten Kirbach

    Research SystemsProduct Innovation

    Phone: +49 351 88597 [email protected]

    • Further investigation of macroscopiccombustion behavior of common MPS fire loadsis needed to better understand possible impacton MPS test results.

    • A more detail definition of „simulated, below-floor cargo compartment of a wide-body aircraft” and „loosely packed standard weight office paper shredded into strips” is necessary to achieve comparable boundary conditions for different test articles.

    • Cargo compartment lining material, surrounding structural buildup, insulation materials and buildup as well as shredded paper composition may need to be specified in more detail.

    SUMMARY CONTACT

    mailto:[email protected]

  • Climbing higher.

    Together.

    Diehl Aviation Holding GmbH

    Vorname Nachname

    Am Flugplatz88471 Laupheim

    Deutschland

    Tel +49 7392 703-0 Fax +49 7392 709-1860

    diehl.com/aviation

  • Climbing higher.

    Together.

    Weitergabe sowie Vervielfältigung dieses Dokuments, Verwertungund Mitteilung seines Inhalts sind verboten, soweit nichtausdrücklich gestattet. Zuwiderhandlungen verpflichten zuSchadenersatz. Alle Rechte für den Fall der Patent-, Gebrauchsmuster- oder Designeintragung vorbehalten.

    The reproduction, distribution and utilization of this document as well as the communication of its contents to others without express authorization is prohibited. Offenders will be held liable for the payment of damages. All rights reserved in the event of the grant of a patent, utility model or design.


Recommended