Climbing higher.
Together.
© Diehl Aviation
EFFECTS OF BOUNDARY CONDITIONS ON MPS
TESTINGKarsten Kirbach
Research Systems2019 May 14th
2Titel der Präsentation, Abteilungskürzel, StandVertraulich C0-C3, © Diehl Stiftung & Co. KG
2Folienmaster, Communications & PR, 09/2018
© Diehl Aviation2© DIEHL AVIATION
Motivation
• For development and certification of a halon replacement fire suppression system extensive testing in alignment with the MPS is necessary.
• Reference for testing and test results is the MPS Test Article at the FAA Technical Center.
• To achieve a high comparability a replica test article needs to be as similar as possible to the FAA MPS Test Article.
• The Minimum Performance Standard for Aircraft Cargo Compartment Halon Replacement Fire Suppression Systems is giving guidelines to build a replica test article, however some boundary conditions may not be defined in sufficient detail to achieve comparability.
EFFECTS OF BOUNDARY CONDITIONS ON MPS
3Titel der Präsentation, Abteilungskürzel, StandVertraulich C0-C3, © Diehl Stiftung & Co. KG
3Folienmaster, Communications & PR, 09/2018
© Diehl Aviation3© DIEHL AVIATION
GUIDELINES GIVEN BY THE MPS
“The fire load […] consists of single-wall corrugated cardboard boxes, […] of 18 by 18 by 18 inches (45.7 by 45.7 by 45.7 cm). The weight per unit area of the cardboard is 0.11 lb/ft2 (0.5417 kg/m2).”
“The boxes are filled with 2.5 pounds (1.1 kg) of loosely packed standard weight office paper shredded into strips (not confetti).”
4Titel der Präsentation, Abteilungskürzel, StandVertraulich C0-C3, © Diehl Stiftung & Co. KG
4Folienmaster, Communications & PR, 09/2018
© Diehl Aviation4© DIEHL AVIATION
Shredded Paper
CALORIFIC VALUE OFCOMMON MPS FIRE LOADS
• Gross Calorific Value acc. DIN EN ISO 18125: 2017-08 „Solid biofuels -Determination of calorific value”
• Samples are grinded down and burnedwithin a bomb calorimeter
• Samples FAA 1 and FAA 2 provided byDhaval Dadia
• Up to 20% difference in Gross CalorificValue
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
105%
110%
115%
FAA 1 FAA 2 sample No. 1 sample No. 2 sample No. 3
Gro
ss C
alo
rifi
c V
alu
e
Shredded Paper used for MPS testing
water free
conditioned
5Titel der Präsentation, Abteilungskürzel, StandVertraulich C0-C3, © Diehl Stiftung & Co. KG
5Folienmaster, Communications & PR, 09/2018
© Diehl Aviation5© DIEHL AVIATION
Cardboard Boxes
CALORIFIC VALUE OFCOMMON MPS FIRE LOADS
• Gross Calorific Value acc. DIN EN ISO 18125: 2017-08 „Solid biofuels -Determination of calorific value”
• Samples are grinded down and burnedwithin a bomb calorimeter
• Samples FAA 1 provided by Dhaval Dadia
• Up to 16% difference in Gross CalorificValue
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
FAA 1 sample No. 1 sample No. 2
Gro
ss C
alo
rifi
c V
alu
e
Cardboard Boxes used for MPS testing
water free
conditioned
6Titel der Präsentation, Abteilungskürzel, StandVertraulich C0-C3, © Diehl Stiftung & Co. KG
6Folienmaster, Communications & PR, 09/2018
© Diehl Aviation6© DIEHL AVIATION
Packed MPS Boxes
CALORIFIC VALUE OFCOMMON MPS FIRE LOADS
• Theoretical Gross calorific Value per packed MPS Box
• Up to 13% difference in GrossCalorific Value
• Samples FAA MPS Box 1 and FAA MPS Box 2 provided by DhavalDadia
• Macroscopic combustion behavioris not considered!
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
105%
Gro
ss C
alo
rifi
c V
alu
e
packed Boxes used for MPS testing
water free
conditioned
7Titel der Präsentation, Abteilungskürzel, StandVertraulich C0-C3, © Diehl Stiftung & Co. KG
7Folienmaster, Communications & PR, 09/2018
© Diehl Aviation
8Titel der Präsentation, Abteilungskürzel, StandVertraulich C0-C3, © Diehl Stiftung & Co. KG
8Folienmaster, Communications & PR, 09/2018
© Diehl Aviation8© DIEHL AVIATION
GUIDELINES GIVEN BY THE MPS
“The fire tests are conducted inside a. The volume of the compartment is 2000 ±100 cubic feet (56.6 ±2.8 m3) (see figure 1).”
9Titel der Präsentation, Abteilungskürzel, StandVertraulich C0-C3, © Diehl Stiftung & Co. KG
9Folienmaster, Communications & PR, 09/2018
© Diehl Aviation9© DIEHL AVIATION
1371 kg
493 kg 477 kg
0 kg
350 kg
700 kg
1050 kg
1400 kg
1750 kg
0,0 kJ/K
150,0 kJ/K
300,0 kJ/K
450,0 kJ/K
600,0 kJ/K
750,0 kJ/K
Galvanized SteelGA16
Aluminium GA14 glassfiber reinforcedplastics
The
rmal
Ma
ss
Mass Properties of Lining Materials
Thermal Mass
Lining Net Mass
THERMAL PROPERTIES OF MPS TEST CELL LINING MATERIALS
• Lining Material for MPS Test cell isnot specified
• Up to 56% difference in thermal mass
• Thermal mass may influence MPS results
Possible effects:
Damping of peak temperatures
Increased thermal inertia of thetest setup
Dhaval Dadia, Oct 31 2018 –
Rebuild of the Cargo MPS Test Article
10Titel der Präsentation, Abteilungskürzel, StandVertraulich C0-C3, © Diehl Stiftung & Co. KG
10Folienmaster, Communications & PR, 09/2018
© Diehl Aviation10© DIEHL AVIATION
32,20E-06 K/W 9,87E-06 K/W000,00E+00 K/W
2,00E-03 K/W
4,00E-03 K/W
6,00E-03 K/W
8,00E-03 K/W
Galvanized Steel GA16 Aluminium GA14 glassfiber reinforcedplastics
The
rmal
Re
sist
ance
pe
r m
²
Thermal Properties of Lining Materials
THERMAL PROPERTIES OF MPS TEST CELL LINING MATERIALS
• Lining Material for MPS Test cell is not specified
• Several orders of magnitude difference in thermal conductivity and thus thermal resistance
• Thermal conductivity and resistance may influence MPS results
Possible effects:
Faster/slower heat conduction through lining material
In-/decreased convective cooling at exterior of test cell(depending on outside surface- and surrounding environmental temperatures)
Increased susceptibillity for surrounding environmental conditions (e.g. temperature, airflow, …) if test cell lining isnot enclosed or insulated
0,34 W/m*K0,00 W/m*K
50,00 W/m*K
100,00 W/m*K
150,00 W/m*K
200,00 W/m*K
Galvanized Steel GA16 Aluminium GA14 glassfiber reinforced plastics
The
rmal
Co
nd
uct
ivit
y
Thermal Properties of Lining Materials
11Titel der Präsentation, Abteilungskürzel, StandVertraulich C0-C3, © Diehl Stiftung & Co. KG
11Folienmaster, Communications & PR, 09/2018
© Diehl Aviation11© DIEHL AVIATION
Karsten Kirbach
Research SystemsProduct Innovation
Phone: +49 351 88597 [email protected]
• Further investigation of macroscopiccombustion behavior of common MPS fire loadsis needed to better understand possible impacton MPS test results.
• A more detail definition of „simulated, below-floor cargo compartment of a wide-body aircraft” and „loosely packed standard weight office paper shredded into strips” is necessary to achieve comparable boundary conditions for different test articles.
• Cargo compartment lining material, surrounding structural buildup, insulation materials and buildup as well as shredded paper composition may need to be specified in more detail.
SUMMARY CONTACT
mailto:[email protected]
Climbing higher.
Together.
Diehl Aviation Holding GmbH
Vorname Nachname
Am Flugplatz88471 Laupheim
Deutschland
Tel +49 7392 703-0 Fax +49 7392 709-1860
diehl.com/aviation
Climbing higher.
Together.
Weitergabe sowie Vervielfältigung dieses Dokuments, Verwertungund Mitteilung seines Inhalts sind verboten, soweit nichtausdrücklich gestattet. Zuwiderhandlungen verpflichten zuSchadenersatz. Alle Rechte für den Fall der Patent-, Gebrauchsmuster- oder Designeintragung vorbehalten.
The reproduction, distribution and utilization of this document as well as the communication of its contents to others without express authorization is prohibited. Offenders will be held liable for the payment of damages. All rights reserved in the event of the grant of a patent, utility model or design.