U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS
REHAB / NEW CONSTRUCTION COMPLETIONS BY UNIT TYPE ACTUAL VS. PROJECTED
PROJECTED*
ACTUAL
TOTAL NUMBER OF UNITS: 51,734
TOTAL ACQUISITION: 5,455
TOTAL CLEARANCE / DEMO: 22,082
TOTAL HOMEOWNERSHIP ASSISTANCE: 8,503
TOTAL REHAB / NEW CONSTRUCTION: 15,694
0% 30% 60% 90% 120% 150%
State vs Local Activity typesRehab/New Construction
0 5000 10000 15000 20000
Actual
Projected
0 5000 10000 15000 20000
Actual
Projected
State -- Actual vs Projected Local -- Actual vs Projected
0
5000
10000
15000
20000Actual
Projected
Single FamilyMultifamily
6,395
13,823
35%
57%
82%
50%
6,552
2,295
15,400
7,628
8,405
12,526
7337
4,203
7,394
3,160
15,224
8,066
8,560
9,556
5,260
4,300
53%
149%
112%
43%
10,395
15,548
TOTAL COMPLETIONS BY ACTIVITY TYPE
ACQUISITION
CLEARANCE / DEMO
HOMEOWNERSHIP ASSISTANCE
REHAB / NEW CONSTRUCTION
22,082
30%
43%
11%
15,694
8,503
5,455
16%
0% 30% 60% 90% 120% 150%
State vs Local Activity typesRehab/New Construction
0 5000 10000 15000 20000
Actual
Projected
0 5000 10000 15000 20000
Actual
Projected
State -- Actual vs Projected Local -- Actual vs Projected
0
5000
10000
15000
20000Actual
Projected
Single FamilyMultifamily
6,395
13,823
35%
57%
82%
50%
6,552
2,295
15,400
7,628
8,405
12,526
7337
4,203
7,394
3,160
15,224
8,066
8,560
9,556
5,260
4,300
53%
149%
112%
43%
10,395
15,548
PERCENT COMPLETE BY ACTIVITY TYPE STATE VS. LOCAL GOVERNMENT
STATE
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
ACQUISITION
CLEARANCE/ DEMO
HOME- OWNERSHIP ASSISTANCE
REHAB/NEW CONSTRUCTION
0% 30% 60% 90% 120% 150%
State vs Local Activity typesRehab/New Construction
0 5000 10000 15000 20000
Actual
Projected
0 5000 10000 15000 20000
Actual
Projected
State -- Actual vs Projected Local -- Actual vs Projected
0
5000
10000
15000
20000Actual
Projected
Single FamilyMultifamily
6,395
13,823
35%
57%
82%
50%
6,552
2,295
15,400
7,628
8,405
12,526
7337
4,203
7,394
3,160
15,224
8,066
8,560
9,556
5,260
4,300
53%
149%
112%
43%
10,395
15,548
* “Projected” refers to the total projected number of households (or properties for Clearance / Demo) the Grantee anticipates to complete by the end of their NSP grant for each Activity Type. Note: Single-Family = 1–4 units; Multifamily = 4+ units
Intense rehab of a single-family home in Mohave County, Arizona
COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES
HOME- REHAB/
CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW
GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL
Through Fourth Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report
LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity
with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee
2
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS
0% 30% 60% 90% 120% 150%
State vs Local Activity typesRehab/New Construction
0 5000 10000 15000 20000
Actual
Projected
0 5000 10000 15000 20000
Actual
Projected
State -- Actual vs Projected Local -- Actual vs Projected
0
5000
10000
15000
20000Actual
Projected
Single FamilyMultifamily
6,395
13,823
35%
57%
82%
50%
6,552
2,295
15,400
7,628
8,405
12,526
7337
4,203
7,394
3,160
15,224
8,066
8,560
9,556
5,260
4,300
53%
149%
112%
43%
10,395
15,548
Adams County, CO 13 3 0 16
LH25 5 5LMMI 8 3 0 11
Akron, OH 0 218 17 235
LH25 0 22 6 28LMMI 0 196 11 207
Alameda County, CA 28 28
LH25 16 16LMMI 12 12
Alaska State Program 37 2 0 91 130
LH25 5 0 20 25LMMI 32 2 0 71 105
Allegheny County, PA 170 35 205
LH25 12 12LMMI 170 23 193
Allentown, PA 0 4 3 7
LH25 0 3 3LMMI 0 4 0 4
COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee
Through Fourth Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report
3
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS
HOME- REHAB/
CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW
GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL
American Samoa 1 1 2
LH25 1 1LMMI 1 1
Anaheim, CA 0 17 0 17
LH25 0 0 0LMMI 17 17
Anderson, IN 0 84 31 115
LH25 0 24 24LMMI 0 84 7 91
Anoka County, MN 3 5 2 18 28
LH25 0 8 8LMMI 3 5 2 10 20
Antioch, CA 12 12
LH25 5 5LMMI 7 7
Apple Valley, CA 0 29 29
LH25 0 0LMMI 0 29 29
Arizona State Program 0 905 89 994
LH25 0 46 89 135LMMI 859 859
Arlington, TX 7 0 25 32
LH25 0 0 7 7LMMI 7 0 18 25
Atlanta, GA 4 16 2 120 142
LH25 4 68 72LMMI 0 16 2 52 70
Augusta, GA 1 0 12 13
LH25 0 0LMMI 1 0 12 13
Aurora, CO 56 0 12 68
LH25 34 12 46LMMI 22 0 0 22
Aurora, IL 7 2 9
LH25 3 3LMMI 4 2 6
COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee
Through Fourth Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report
4
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS
HOME- REHAB/
CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW
GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL
Avondale City, AZ 4 46 0 50
LH25 8 0 8LMMI 4 38 42
Babylon Township, NY 5 5
LH25 4 4LMMI 1 1
Bakersfield, CA 19 77 71 167
LH25 19 19LMMI 77 71 148
Baltimore County, MD 27 34 33 94
LH25 4 4LMMI 27 34 29 90
Baltimore, MD 70 70
LH25 46 46LMMI 24 24
Baton Rouge, LA 12 12
LH25 12 12
Bergen County, NJ 8 3 4 15
LH25 8 4 12LMMI 3 3
Birmingham, AL 0 21 21
LH25 0 7 7LMMI 0 14 14
Boston, MA 6 8 9 23
LH25 3 4 7LMMI 3 8 5 16
Boynton Beach, FL 12 12
LH25 9 9LMMI 3 3
Brevard County, FL 11 3 39 53
LH25 5 9 14LMMI 6 3 30 39
Brockton, MA 1 8 6 15
LH25 0 4 4LMMI 1 8 2 11
COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee
Through Fourth Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report
5
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS
HOME- REHAB/
CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW
GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL
Broward County, FL 0 5 22 113 140
LH25 0 51 51LMMI 0 5 22 62 89
Butler County, OH 29 6 35
LH25 3 3LMMI 29 3 32
Canton Township, MI 8 8
LH25 1 1LMMI 7 7
Canton, OH 2 16 18
LH25 10 10LMMI 2 6 8
Cape Coral, FL 0 38 37 75
LH25 8 8LMMI 0 38 29 67
Chandler, AZ 22 7 29
LH25 6 6LMMI 16 7 23
Charlotte, NC 0 20 15 35
LH25 0 15 15LMMI 0 20 20
Chattanooga, TN 10 52 4 9 75
LH25 10 10LMMI 52 4 9 65
Chicago, IL 76 58 134
LH25 22 22LMMI 76 36 112
Chula Vista, CA 20 2 22
LH25 8 8LMMI 12 2 14
Cicero, IL 0 12 3 15
LH25 0 6 0 6LMMI 6 3 9
Cincinnati, OH 187 52 239
LH25 26 26LMMI 187 26 213
COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee
Through Fourth Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report
6
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS
HOME- REHAB/
CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW
GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL
Clark County, NV 13 197 210
LH25 72 72LMMI 13 125 138
Clayton County, GA 9 158 167
LH25 1 71 72LMMI 8 87 95
Cleveland, OH 687 105 792
LH25 82 82LMMI 687 23 710
Clinton Township, MI 11 0 12 23
LH25 11 11LMMI 0 12 12
Cobb County, GA 0 50 50
LH25 0 3 3LMMI 47 47
Collier County, FL 22 1 26 49
LH25 22 5 27LMMI 1 21 22
Columbus, OH 99 111 210
LH25 91 91LMMI 99 20 119
Columbus-Muscogee, GA 0 1 1 3 5
LH25 0 1 3 4LMMI 0 1 0 0 1
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 16 16
LH25 5 5LMMI 11 11
Compton, CA 5 5
LH25 0 0LMMI 5 5
Connecticut State Program 51 1 12 7 71
LH25 26 5 31LMMI 25 1 12 2 40
Contra Costa County, CA 17 23 40
LH25 9 9LMMI 17 14 31
COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee
Through Fourth Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report
7
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS
HOME- REHAB/
CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW
GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL
Cook County, IL 0 38 8 46
LH25 0 0 0LMMI 0 38 8 46
Coral Springs, FL 38 38 76
LH25 10 10 20LMMI 28 28 56
Corona, CA 9 9
LH25 0 0LMMI 9 9
Cuyahoga County, OH 53 7 203 263
LH25 180 180LMMI 53 7 23 83
Dakota County, MN 0 14 41 5 60
LH25 0 4 5 9LMMI 0 14 37 51
Dallas County, TX 12 30 42
LH25 12 12LMMI 30 30
Dallas, TX 42 42 84
LH25 17 17LMMI 25 42 67
Dayton, OH 546 4 550
LH25 4 4LMMI 546 0 546
Dearborn, MI 54 4 58
LH25 3 3LMMI 54 1 55
Deerfield Beach, FL 0 7 0 7
LH25 0 3 0 3LMMI 0 4 4
Dekalb County, GA 0 27 150 177
LH25 1 94 95LMMI 0 26 56 82
Deltona, FL 50 50
LH25 17 17LMMI 33 33
COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee
Through Fourth Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report
8
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS
HOME- REHAB/
CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW
GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL
Denver, CO 40 13 53
LH25 30 30LMMI 10 13 23
Detroit, MI 0 3,080 0 0 3,080
LH25 0 0LMMI 0 3,080 0 0 3,080
DuPage County , IL 26 15 8 49
LH25 7 0 7LMMI 19 15 8 42
El Paso, TX 0 2 2
LH25 0 0LMMI 0 2 2
Elgin, IL 0 0 5 5
LH25 3 3LMMI 0 0 2 2
Elk Grove, CA 15 13 28
LH25 4 4LMMI 15 9 24
Elkhart, IN 0 55 1 56
LH25 0 1 1LMMI 0 55 0 55
Elyria, OH 38 8 46
LH25 6 6LMMI 38 2 40
Escambia County, FL 0 48 8 83 139
LH25 0 46 46LMMI 0 48 8 37 93
Euclid, OH 0 125 7 132
LH25 0 2 2LMMI 0 125 5 130
Evansville, IN 1 86 11 98
LH25 1 3 4LMMI 0 86 8 94
Fairfax County, VA 28 10 38
LH25 28 28LMMI 10 10
COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee
Through Fourth Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report
9
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS
HOME- REHAB/
CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW
GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL
Flint, MI 0 125 0 125
LH25 0 0LMMI 0 125 0 125
Fontana, CA 25 25
LH25 7 7LMMI 18 18
Fort Bend County, TX 0 4 18 22
LH25 2 14 16LMMI 0 2 4 6
Fort Lauderdale, FL 26 26
LH25 8 8LMMI 18 18
Fort Wayne, IN 0 1 27 28
LH25 3 3LMMI 0 1 24 25
Fort Worth, TX 0 166 166
LH25 0 13 13LMMI 153 153
Franklin County, OH 8 0 20 28
LH25 2 12 14LMMI 6 0 8 14
Fresno County. CA 68 68 136
LH25 25 25 50LMMI 43 43 86
Fresno, CA 260 82 0 342
LH25 236 236LMMI 24 82 0 106
Ft. Myers, FL 15 19 34
LH25 14 4 18LMMI 1 15 16
Fulton County, GA 0 89 89
LH25 0 26 26LMMI 0 63 63
Garland, TX 9 10 4 23
LH25 4 4LMMI 5 10 4 19
COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee
Through Fourth Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report
10
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS
HOME- REHAB/
CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW
GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL
Gary, IN 11 185 196
LH25 9 9LMMI 2 185 187
Genesee County, MI 40 150 8 0 198
LH25 21 0 21LMMI 19 150 8 177
Glendale, AZ 69 69
LH25 0 0LMMI 69 69
Grand Prairie, TX 18 61 79
LH25 4 10 14LMMI 14 51 65
Grand Rapids, MI 0 10 37 47
LH25 11 11LMMI 0 10 26 36
Greenville County, SC 4 45 21 70
LH25 3 21 24LMMI 1 45 46
Gwinnett County, GA 112 36 143 291
LH25 58 2 61 121LMMI 54 34 82 170
Hamilton City, OH 1 8 0 10 19
LH25 1 5 6LMMI 0 8 0 5 13
Hamilton County, IN 23 23
LH25 5 5LMMI 18 18
Hamilton County, OH 2 104 34 140
LH25 1 16 17LMMI 1 104 18 123
Hammond, IN 25 25
LH25 12 12LMMI 13 13
Harris County, TX 81 131 212
LH25 0 131 131LMMI 81 81
COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee
Through Fourth Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report
11
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS
HOME- REHAB/
CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW
GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL
Hawaii State Program 16 59 75
LH25 28 28LMMI 16 31 47
Hemet, CA 44 0 44
LH25 5 5LMMI 39 0 39
Henderson, NV 18 14 6 38
LH25 9 3 12LMMI 9 14 3 26
Hennepin County, MN 32 19 51
LH25 9 6 15LMMI 23 13 36
Hesperia, CA 0 0
LH25 0 0LMMI 0 0
Hialeah, FL 0 0
LH25 0 0LMMI 0 0
Hidalgo County, TX 5 5
LH25 1 1LMMI 4 4
Hillsborough County, FL 46 0 0 46
LH25 0 0LMMI 46 0 0 46
Hollywood, FL 25 11 22 58
LH25 25 3 28LMMI 0 11 19 30
Homestead City, FL 12 0 2 12 26
LH25 4 4 8LMMI 8 0 2 8 18
Houston, TX 13 0 0 13
LH25 10 0 10LMMI 3 0 3
Indianapolis, IN 239 134 373
LH25 73 73LMMI 239 61 300
COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee
Through Fourth Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report
12
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS
HOME- REHAB/
CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW
GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL
Islip Town, NY 9 9
LH25 3 3LMMI 6 6
Jackson, MS 0 11 11
LH25 0 8 8LMMI 0 3 3
Jacksonville-Duval, FL 0 0 110 110
LH25 52 52LMMI 0 0 58 58
Jefferson County, AL 0 15 15
LH25 0 6 6LMMI 0 9 9
Jersey City, NJ 6 9 70 85
LH25 43 43LMMI 6 9 27 42
Joliet, IL 3 11 17 31
LH25 5 5LMMI 3 11 12 26
Kane County, IL 1 7 8
LH25 0 3 3LMMI 1 4 5
Kansas City, MO 24 24
LH25 5 5LMMI 19 19
Kent County, MI 19 32 51
LH25 7 9 16LMMI 12 23 35
Kern County, CA 28 0 28
LH25 26 0 26LMMI 2 0 2
Kissimmee, FL 10 0 10
LH25 0 0LMMI 10 0 10
Knoxville, TN 8 6 104 118
LH25 2 47 49LMMI 6 6 57 69
COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee
Through Fourth Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report
13
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS
HOME- REHAB/
CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW
GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL
Kokomo, IN 0 0 0 13 13
LH25 0 9 9LMMI 0 0 0 4 4
Lake County, FL 0 0 28 28
LH25 0 13 13LMMI 0 0 15 15
Lake County, IL 39 39
LH25 13 13LMMI 26 26
Lake County, IN 21 22 24 67
LH25 24 24LMMI 21 22 43
Lake County, OH 0 16 16
LH25 0 0LMMI 16 16
Lakeland, FL 0 5 12 17
LH25 0 3 5 8LMMI 0 2 7 9
Lancaster, CA 19 0 19
LH25 9 0 9LMMI 10 0 10
Lansing, MI 84 18 102
LH25 8 8LMMI 84 10 94
Las Vegas, NV 29 0 106 135
LH25 29 29LMMI 0 0 106 106
Lauderhill, FL 3 35 38
LH25 1 7 8LMMI 2 28 30
Lee County, FL 70 132 202
LH25 70 1 71LMMI 0 131 131
Lincoln Park, MI 22 17 39
LH25 13 13LMMI 22 4 26
COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee
Through Fourth Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report
14
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS
HOME- REHAB/
CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW
GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL
Long Beach, CA 10 10
LH25 0 0LMMI 10 10
Lorain, OH 6 124 130
LH25 4 4LMMI 2 124 126
Los Angeles County, CA 21 100 121
LH25 21 21LMMI 100 100
Los Angeles, CA 20 40 60
LH25 3 8 11LMMI 17 32 49
Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government, KY 16 16
LH25 3 3LMMI 13 13
Macomb County, MI 0 21 108 0 129
LH25 0 81 0 81LMMI 21 27 48
Manatee County, FL 0 98 1 29 128
LH25 0 1 22 23LMMI 0 98 0 7 105
Margate, FL 10 10
LH25 4 4LMMI 6 6
Maricopa County, AZ 57 10 0 67
LH25 21 0 21LMMI 36 10 46
Marion County, FL 39 0 10 49
LH25 17 0 17LMMI 22 0 10 32
McHenry County, IL 16 16
LH25 6 6LMMI 10 10
Memphis, TN 21 59 22 102
LH25 0 0 0LMMI 21 59 22 102
COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee
Through Fourth Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report
15
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS
HOME- REHAB/
CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW
GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL
Mesa, AZ 0 1 0 62 63
LH25 0 1 33 34LMMI 0 0 29 29
Mesquite, TX 7 7
LH25 4 4LMMI 3 3
Miami Gardens City, FL 0 5 0 50 55
LH25 8 8LMMI 0 5 0 42 47
Miami, FL 26 33 111 170
LH25 25 25LMMI 1 33 111 145
Miami-Dade County, FL 12 0 5 0 17
LH25 0 0 0LMMI 12 0 5 0 17
Middletown, OH 37 15 52
LH25 6 6LMMI 37 9 46
Milwaukee, WI 58 109 58 225
LH25 36 37 73LMMI 58 73 21 152
Minneapolis, MN 0 99 6 8 113
LH25 4 4LMMI 0 99 6 4 109
Miramar, FL 23 47 47 117
LH25 8 9 9 26LMMI 15 38 38 91
Modesto, CA 49 2 51
LH25 13 13LMMI 36 2 38
Montgomery County, MD 1 1
LH25 1 1
Montgomery County, OH 0 78 1 26 105
LH25 12 12LMMI 0 78 1 14 93
COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee
Through Fourth Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report
16
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS
HOME- REHAB/
CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW
GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL
Moreno Valley, CA 42 42
LH25 4 4LMMI 38 38
Muncie, IN 0 4 4
LH25 4 4LMMI 0 0
Nashville-Davidson, TN 52 52
LH25 44 44LMMI 8 8
Nassau County, NY 0 148 148
LH25 126 126LMMI 0 22 22
New Mexico State Program 12 130 142
LH25 5 56 61LMMI 7 74 81
New Orleans, LA 0 36 0 36
LH25 0 0LMMI 36 0 36
New York City, NY 11 26 37
LH25 11 0 11LMMI 26 26
Newark, NJ 4 79 83
LH25 0 21 21LMMI 4 58 62
North Miami, FL 15 15
LH25 5 5LMMI 10 10
Northern Mariana Islands 9 9
LH25 6 6LMMI 3 3
Oakland County, MI 81 180 158 419
LH25 92 71 163LMMI 81 88 87 256
Oakland, CA 2 0 2
LH25 0 0LMMI 2 2
COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee
Through Fourth Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report
17
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS
HOME- REHAB/
CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW
GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL
Oklahoma City, OK 0 0
LH25 0 0LMMI 0 0
Oklahoma State Program 0 40 0 2 42
LH25 0 1 0 2 3LMMI 0 39 0 0 39
Ontario, CA 0 16 16
LH25 0 4 4LMMI 0 12 12
Orange County, CA 8 8
LH25 1 1LMMI 7 7
Orange County, FL 12 28 150 71 261
LH25 12 14 0 26LMMI 0 28 136 71 235
Orange County, NY 0 6 6
LH25 1 1LMMI 0 5 5
Orlando, FL 2 0 41 43
LH25 0 13 13LMMI 2 0 28 30
Palm Bay, FL 42 4 16 62
LH25 14 4 16 34LMMI 28 0 28
Palm Beach County, FL 217 217
LH25 96 96LMMI 121 121
Palmdale, CA 18 0 18
LH25 11 11LMMI 7 0 7
Pasco County, FL 0 93 0 209 302
LH25 0 0 53 53LMMI 0 93 0 156 249
Paterson, NJ 2 7 9
LH25 5 5LMMI 2 2 4
COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee
Through Fourth Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report
18
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS
HOME- REHAB/
CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW
GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL
Pembroke Pines, FL 3 36 36 75
LH25 2 1 2 5LMMI 1 35 34 70
Philadelphia, PA 47 47
LH25 0 0LMMI 47 47
Phoenix, AZ 0 16 186 229 431
LH25 5 169 174LMMI 0 16 181 60 257
Pima County, AZ 0 5 15 20
LH25 11 11LMMI 0 5 4 9
Pinellas County, FL 0 0 0 71 71
LH25 0 36 36LMMI 0 0 0 35 35
Pittsburgh, PA 154 73 227
LH25 46 46LMMI 154 27 181
Plantation, FL 8 6 14
LH25 0 0 0LMMI 8 6 14
Polk County, Fl 0 163 163
LH25 30 30LMMI 0 133 133
Pomona, CA 13 0 0 13
LH25 6 6LMMI 7 0 0 7
Pompano Beach, FL 20 3 1 24
LH25 10 10LMMI 10 3 1 14
Pontiac, MI 9 89 1 12 111
LH25 3 12 15LMMI 6 89 1 96
Port St. Lucie, FL 0 30 0 107 137
LH25 0 13 0 44 57LMMI 0 17 0 63 80
COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee
Through Fourth Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report
19
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS
HOME- REHAB/
CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW
GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL
Prince Georges County, MD 1,117 26 1,143
LH25 142 4 146LMMI 975 22 997
Prince William County, VA 3 22 25
LH25 3 1 4LMMI 21 21
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9 9
LH25 3 3LMMI 6 6
Redford, MI 25 0 37 62
LH25 0 13 13LMMI 25 0 24 49
Rhode Island State Program 2 2 136 225 365
LH25 100 100LMMI 2 2 136 125 265
Rialto, CA 3 58 61
LH25 0 0LMMI 3 58 61
Richland County, SC 37 12 49
LH25 9 9LMMI 37 3 40
Richmond, CA 0 14 14
LH25 0 6 6LMMI 8 8
Riverside County, CA 65 67 214 346
LH25 65 3 64 132LMMI 0 64 150 214
Riverside, CA 62 9 71
LH25 35 35LMMI 27 9 36
Rockford, IL 1 26 0 1 28
LH25 0 1 1LMMI 1 26 0 0 27
Sacramento County, CA 0 1 166 167
LH25 55 55LMMI 0 1 111 112
COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee
Through Fourth Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report
20
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS
HOME- REHAB/
CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW
GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL
Sacramento, CA 0 0 111 111
LH25 38 38LMMI 0 0 73 73
San Antonio, TX 105 18 214 337
LH25 86 0 86LMMI 19 18 214 251
San Bernardino County, CA 18 286 304
LH25 7 148 155LMMI 11 138 149
San Bernardino, CA 54 11 65
LH25 9 9LMMI 45 11 56
San Diego County, CA 14 3 1 18
LH25 14 1 15LMMI 3 3
San Diego, CA 38 51 4 93
LH25 30 4 34LMMI 8 51 59
San Joaquin County, CA 80 0 42 122
LH25 42 42LMMI 80 0 80
San Jose, CA 5 5
LH25 5 5
Santa Ana, CA 50 4 54
LH25 14 14LMMI 36 4 40
Sarasota County, FL 60 60
LH25 26 26LMMI 34 34
Savannah, GA 2 6 8
LH25 2 1 3LMMI 0 5 5
Seminole County, FL 3 58 61
LH25 0 35 35LMMI 3 23 26
COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee
Through Fourth Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report
21
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS
HOME- REHAB/
CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW
GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL
Shelby County, TN 25 34 59
LH25 6 11 17LMMI 19 23 42
South Bend, IN 69 25 94
LH25 17 17LMMI 69 8 77
South Carolina State Program 206 307 77 590
LH25 124 70 194LMMI 82 307 7 396
Southfield, MI 6 65 51 122
LH25 22 22LMMI 6 65 29 100
Springfield, MA 0 24 24
LH25 14 14LMMI 0 10 10
Springfield, OH 0 30 22 52
LH25 0 0 12 12LMMI 0 30 10 40
St Paul, MN 30 30
LH25 22 22LMMI 8 8
St Petersburg, FL 0 0 20 20
LH25 0 20 20LMMI 0 0 0 0
St. Clair County, IL 42 42
LH25 18 18LMMI 24 24
St. Louis County, MO 0 33 33
LH25 0 18 18LMMI 0 15 15
St. Louis, MO 0 3 3
LH25 0 0 0LMMI 0 3 3
Stanislaus County, CA 69 3 69 141
LH25 24 24 48LMMI 45 3 45 93
COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee
Through Fourth Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report
22
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS
HOME- REHAB/
CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW
GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL
Stark County, OH 33 17 42 2 94
LH25 14 14LMMI 19 17 42 2 80
State of Alabama 0 156 156
LH25 75 75LMMI 0 81 81
State of Arkansas 271 271
LH25 260 260LMMI 11 11
State of California 0 90 198 530 818
LH25 0 187 187LMMI 90 198 343 631
State of Colorado 0 0 0 0
LH25 0 0 0LMMI 0 0 0 0
State of Delaware 3 28 51 82
LH25 7 14 21LMMI 3 21 37 61
State of Florida 531 12 100 736 1379
LH25 267 1 300 568LMMI 264 11 100 436 811
State of Georgia 14 0 559 363 936
LH25 0 0 74 142 216LMMI 14 0 485 221 720
State of Idaho 206 53 259
LH25 59 5 64LMMI 147 48 195
State of Illinois 0 1 74 75
LH25 47 47LMMI 0 1 27 28
State of Indiana – IHCDA 118 478 527 1,123
LH25 242 242LMMI 118 478 285 881
State of Iowa 73 142 131 346
LH25 48 28 51 127LMMI 25 114 80 219
COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee
Through Fourth Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report
23
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS
HOME- REHAB/
CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW
GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL
State of Kansas 3 2 24 190 219
LH25 2 4 81 87LMMI 1 2 20 109 132
State of Kentucky 26 28 13 168 235
LH25 7 13 70 90LMMI 26 21 98 145
State of Louisiana 0 0 167 232 399
LH25 0 0 151 151LMMI 0 0 167 81 248
State of Maine 0 6 26 32
LH25 0 11 11LMMI 0 6 15 21
State of Maryland 5 1 236 48 290
LH25 2 30 31 63LMMI 3 1 206 17 227
State of Massachusetts 24 32 189 245
LH25 7 101 108LMMI 17 32 88 137
State of Michigan 0 756 21 141 918
LH25 3 6 9LMMI 0 756 18 135 909
State of Minnesota 121 181 302
LH25 31 73 104LMMI 90 108 198
State of Mississippi 546 139 685
LH25 92 139 231LMMI 454 454
State of Missouri 4 6 295 14 319
LH25 0 3 14 17LMMI 4 3 295 0 302
State of Montana 0 3 152 155
LH25 0 3 85 88LMMI 0 67 67
State of Nebraska 10 99 109
LH25 19 19LMMI 10 80 90
COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee
Through Fourth Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report
24
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS
HOME- REHAB/
CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW
GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL
State of Nevada 128 116 244
LH25 80 80LMMI 128 36 164
State of New Hampshire 0 19 28 47
LH25 0 0 0LMMI 0 19 28 47
State of New Jersey 2 10 166 178
LH25 2 10 97 109LMMI 0 0 69 69
State of New York 167 343 510
LH25 227 227LMMI 167 116 283
State of North Carolina 30 6 408 286 730
LH25 19 0 206 242 467LMMI 11 6 202 44 263
State of North Dakota – DOC 1 1 199 201
LH25 60 60LMMI 1 1 139 141
State of Ohio 0 10,379 135 10,514
LH25 18 18LMMI 0 10,379 117 10,496
State of Oregon 169 58 227
LH25 18 35 53LMMI 151 23 174
State of Pennsylvania 7 442 449
LH25 305 305LMMI 7 137 144
State of South Dakota 12 3 1 99 115
LH25 3 0 0 43 46LMMI 9 3 1 56 69
State of Tennessee 130 146 4 3 283
LH25 27 3 30LMMI 103 146 4 0 253
State of Texas – TDHCA 56 163 18 31 268
LH25 39 6 16 61LMMI 17 163 12 15 207
COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee
Through Fourth Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report
25
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS
HOME- REHAB/
CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW
GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL
State of Utah 163 0 0 163
LH25 102 102LMMI 61 0 0 61
State of Vermont 22 0 175 197
LH25 15 87 102LMMI 7 0 88 95
State of Virginia 0 0 0 0
LH25 0 0LMMI 0 0 0 0
State of Washington 93 3 54 150
LH25 55 0 55LMMI 38 3 54 95
State of West Virginia 123 123
LH25 65 65LMMI 58 58
State of Wisconsin 0 64 59 310 433
LH25 0 18 180 198LMMI 0 64 41 130 235
Sterling Heights, MI 0 25 12 37
LH25 12 12LMMI 0 25 25
Stockton, CA 2 7 61 70
LH25 0 0LMMI 2 7 61 70
Suffolk County, NY 20 20
LH25 6 6LMMI 14 14
Summit County, OH 0 65 65
LH25 0 48 48LMMI 0 17 17
Sunrise, FL 1 0 14 15
LH25 0 4 4LMMI 1 0 10 11
Surprise Town, AZ 26 0 26
LH25 10 0 10LMMI 16 0 16
COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee
Through Fourth Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report
26
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS
HOME- REHAB/
CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW
GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL
Tamarac, FL 1 53 53 107
LH25 16 16 32LMMI 1 37 37 75
Tampa, FL 0 109 109
LH25 0 81 81LMMI 0 28 28
Tarrant County, TX 14 10 24
LH25 10 10LMMI 14 14
Taylor, MI 21 21
LH25 5 5LMMI 16 16
Territory of Guam 3 3
LH25 3 3
Toledo, OH 112 51 163
LH25 17 17LMMI 112 34 146
Tucson, AZ 11 11
LMMI 11 11
Union County, NJ 0 0 0
LH25 0 0 0LMMI 0 0
Vallejo, CA 3 6 9
LH25 0 0LMMI 3 6 9
Victorville, CA 66 2 17 0 85
LH25 57 2 59LMMI 9 17 0 26
Virgin Islands 0 0 0
LH25 0 0LMMI 0 0 0
Visalia, CA 27 27
LH25 5 5LMMI 22 22
Volusia County, FL 11 40 51
LH25 11 19 30LMMI 21 21
COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee
Through Fourth Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report
27
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS
HOME- REHAB/
CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW
GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL
