+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Date post: 24-Jan-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
89
Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit October 28, 2008 Hiroshi Iwai, Tokyo Institute of Technology @Shenyang University of Technology 1
Transcript
Page 1: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

October 28, 2008

Hiroshi Iwai, Tokyo Institute of Technology

@Shenyang University of Technology

1

Page 2: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Founded in 1881, Promoted to Univ. 1929

Tokyo Institute of Technology東京工業大学

Page 3: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Tokyo Institute of Technology東京工業大学

Promoted to Univ. 1929

Page 4: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

International StudentsInternational Students

Asia 847Europe 78 North America 12

South America 24Oceania 5

Africa 16

Total 982

Country Students

China 403

S. Korea 130

Indonesia 64

Thailand 55

Vietnam 60

Malaysia 28

(As of May. 1, 2005)

Total 10,000 students: 5,000 under graduate

5,000 graduate

Page 5: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

• There were many inventions in the 20th

century:Airplane, Nuclear Power generation,

Computer,Space aircraft, etc

• However, everything has to be controlled by electronics

• ElectronicsMost important invention in the 20th

century• What is Electronics: To use electrons,

Electronic Circuits

Page 6: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Lee De Forest

Electronic Circuits started by the invention of vacuum tube (Triode) in 1906

Cathode(heated) Grid

Anode(Positive bias)

Thermal electrons from cathodecontrolled by grid bias

Same mechanism as that of transistor

Page 7: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

7

4 wives of Lee De Forest

1906 Lucille Sheardown1907 Nora Blatch1912 Mary Mayo, singer1930 Marie Mosquini, silent film actress

Mary Marie

Page 8: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

First Computer Eniac: made of huge number of vacuum tubes 19Big size, huge power, short life time filament

Today's pocket PCmade of semiconductor has much higher performance with extremely low power consumption

dreamed of replacing vacuum tube with solid-state device

8

Page 9: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

History of Semiconductor devices

1947, 1st Point Contact Bipolar Transistor: Ge Semiconductor, Bardeen, Brattin

Nobel Prize1948, 1st Junction Bipolar Transistor,

Ge Semiconductor, SchokleyNobel Prize

1958, 1st Integrated Circuits, Ge Semiconductor, J.Kilby Nobel Prize

1959, 1st Planar Integrated Circuits, Noice

1960, 1st MOS Transistor, Kahng, Si Semiconductor

1963, 1st CMOS Circuits, C.T. Sah and F. Wanlass9

Page 10: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

History of Electronic Devices

Transistor Concept

IC

Vacuum tube 1st Electronic circuits

Solid-State Circuits

Silicon TechnologyLSI

2000

706050

30

2010

1900TriodeDiode

MOSFETMISFET

bipolarICSi-MOSFET

1st Transistor

VLSI

LSI

CMOS

30 years

ULSI

20 years

10 years

Low Power

High Integration

Low PowerHigh speedHigh integration

Low PowerHigh speedHigh integration

10

Page 11: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

J.E.LILIENFELD

J. E. LILIENFELD

DEVICES FOR CONTROLLED ELECTRIC CURRENTFiled March 28, 1928

11

Page 12: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

ElectronSemiconductor

Gate Electrode

Gate InsulatorNegative bias

Positive bias

Capacitor structure with notch

No current

Current flows

Electricfield

12

Page 13: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Gate ElectrodePoly-crystal Si

Gate InsulatorSiO2

Drain

SiSubstrate

Source

Channel N-MOS (N-type MOSFET)

Gate ElectrodePoly Si

Gate InsulatorSiO2

SubstrateSi

Use Gate Field Effect for switching

ee

13

Page 14: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Source Channel Drain

0V

N+-Si P-Si

N-Si

0V

1V

Negative

Source Channel DrainN-Si1V

N+-Si P-Si

Surface Potential (Negative direction)

Gate Oxd

ChannelSource Drain

Gate electrode

S D

G

0 bias for gate Positive bias for gate

Surface

Electron flow

14

Page 15: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

N-MOS

Source Drain

Source Drain

(N-type MOSFET)

Gate

P-MOS (P-type MOSFET)

Gate

Hole flow

Electron flow

Current flow

Current flow

15

Page 16: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

However, no one could realize MOSFET operation for more than 30 years.Because of very bad interface property between the semiconductor and gate insulatorEven Shockley!

16

Page 17: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Very bad interface property between the semiconductor and gate insulator

Even Shockley!

eGe

GeO Electric Shielding

CarrierScattering

Interfacial Charges

Drain Current was several orders of magnitude smthan expected

17

Page 18: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

1947: 1st transistor W. Bratten,

W. ShockleyBipolar using Ge

However, they found amplification phenomenon when investigatingGe surface when putting needles.This is the 1st Transistor: Not Field Effect Transistor, But Bipolar Transistor (another mechanism)

J. Bardeen

18

Page 19: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

1958: 1st Integrated Circuit Jack S. Kilby

Connect 2 bipolar transistors in theSame substrate by bonding wire.

19

Page 20: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

1960: First MOSFET by D. Kahng and M. Atalla

Top View

Al Gate

Source

Drain

Si

Si

断面

Al

SiO2

Si

Si/SiO2 Interface is extraordinarily good

20

Page 21: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

1970,71: 1st generation of LSIs

DRAM Intel 1103 MPU Intel 4004

21

Page 22: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

MOS LSI experienced continuous progress for many years

1960s IC (Integrated Circuits) ~

1970s LSI (Large Scale Integrated Circuit) ~1,0

1980s VLSI (Very Large Scale IC) ~10,0

1990s ULSI (Ultra Large Scale IC) ~1,000,0

2000s ?LSI (? Large Scale IC) ~1000,000

Name of Integrated Circuits Number of Transistors

22

Page 23: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Gate ElectrodePoly Si

Gate InsulatorSiO2

Drain

SiSubstrate

Source

Channel N-MOS (N-type MOSFET)

Gate ElectrodePoly Si

Gate InsulatorSiO2

SubstrateSi

Use Gate Field Effect for switching

ee

23

Page 24: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

N-MOS

Source Drain

Source Drain

(N-type MOSFET)

Gate

P-MOS (P-type MOSFET)

Gate

Hole flow

Electron flow

Current flow

Current flow

24

Page 25: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

OFF Gate

Source

DrainSource

Drain

ON

Electrons

1 V

1 V0 V

0 V

Gate

1 V

1 V0 V

1 VElectron flow

High PotentialRegion

25

Page 26: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

26

OFF

OFF

Gate bias

Gate biasNegative voltage

Positive

Current

Negative

Current

ON

ON

Dra

in C

urre

nt

Dra

in C

urre

nt

Positive voltage

Threshold voltage

Threshold voltage

Page 27: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

27

CMOS

Complimentary MOS

Inverter

PMOS

NMOS

When NMOS is ON, PMOS is OFFWhen PMOS is ON, NMOS is OFF

Page 28: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

28

InputOutput

0 V

NMOS (OFF)

PMOS (ON)

1 V

1 V

0 V

0 V

1 V (0V)

(0 V)

(-1 V)

(-1V)

S

G

D

D

B

B

G

S

Page 29: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

29

InputOutput

1 V

NMOS (ON)

PMOS (OFF)

0 V

1 V

0 V

0 V

1 V (0V)

(0 V)

(0 V)

(-1V)

S

G

D

D

B

B

G

S

Page 30: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

30

Output

Inverter

Input Output

Page 31: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

31

0 1 0 1

1 0 1 0

1

0

Outputτ τ τ

1

0

1

03τ 3τ

Oscillator

Page 32: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

32

Outputτ τ

Page 33: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

33

1 0 1

1 0 1

1

1

Outputτ τ

1 1

Latch (Memory)

Page 34: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

34

VD

C

CVD2

1

2P =

VD

C

Q Charge Q Discharge

1 cycle Clock frequency f

fCVD2

1

2P =

CMOS: Low Power: No DC current from Power supply to the ground

Page 35: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

35

ANDInput 1 1 1 0 0Input 2 1 0 1 0Output 1 0 0 0

NAND= NOT・ANDInput1 1 1 0 0Input2 1 0 1 0Output 0 1 1 1

1V 1V

2 input NAND Circuit

Input 1

Input 1

Input 2

Input 2

Output

Page 36: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

CMOS Technology: Indispensible for our human society

Al the human activities are controlled by CMOS

living, production, financing, telecommunication, transportation, medical care, education, entertainment, etc.

Without CMOS:

world economical activities immediately stop.

Cellarer phone dose not exists

Needless to say, but….

There is no computer in banks, and

36

Page 37: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

1900 1950 1960 1970 2000

VacuumTube

Transistor IC LSI ULSI

10 cm cm mm 10 µm 100 nm

In 100 years, the size reduced by one million times.There have been many devices from stone age.We have never experienced such a tremendous reduction of devices in human history.

10-1m 10-2m 10-3m 10-5m 10-7m

Downsizing of the components has been the driving force for circuit evolution

37

Page 38: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Downsizing1. Reduce Capacitance

Reduce switching time of MOSFETsIncrease clock frequency

Increase circuit operation speed2. Increase number of Transistors

Parallel processingIncrease circuit operation speed

Thus, downsizing of Si devices is the most important and critical issu38

Downsizing contribute to the performance increase in double ways 一石二鳥

Page 39: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Late 1970’s 1µm: SCEEarly 1980’s 0.5µm: S/D resistanceEarly 1980’s 0.25µm: Direct-tunneling of gate SiOLate 1980’s 0.1µm: ‘0.1µm brick wall’(various)

2000 50nm: ‘Red brick wall’ (various)

2000 10nm: Fundamental?

Period Expected Cause limit(size)

Many people wanted to say about the limit. Past predictions were not correct!!

39

Page 40: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Historically, many predictions of the limit of downsizing.VLSI text book written 1979 predict that 0.25 micro-meter would be the limit because of direct-tunneling current through the very thin-gate oxide.

Page 41: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

41C. Mead L. Conway

Page 42: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

VLSI textbookFinally, there appears to be a fundamental limit 10 of approximately quarter micron channel length, where certain physical effects such as the tunneling through the gate oxide .....begin to make the devices of smaller dimension unworkable.

42

Page 43: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Potential Barrier

Wave function

Direct-tunneling effect

43

G

SD

Gate Oxide

Gate OxideGate Electrode

Si Substrate

Direct tunneling leakage current start to flow when the thickness is 3 nm.

Direct tunnelingcurrent

Page 44: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Direct tunneling leakage wfound to be OK! In 1994!

Vg = 2.0V

1.5 V

1.0 V

0.5 V

0.0 V

1.6

1.2

0.8

0.4

0.0

-0.40.0 0.5 1.0 1.5

Vd (V)

Vg = 2.0V

1.5 V

1.0 V

0.5 V

0.0 V

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.0

-0.10.0 0.5 1.0 1.5

Vd (V)

Vg = 2.0V

1.5 V

1.0 V

0.5 V

0.0 V

0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02

0.00

-0.020.0 0.5 1.0 1.5

Vd (V)

Vg = 2.0V

1.5 V

1.0 V

0.5 V

0.0 V

0.03

0.02

0.01

0.00

0.01

-0.40.0 0.5 1.0 1.5

Vd (V)

Id (m

A / μ

m)

Lg = 10 µm Lg = 5 µm Lg = 1.0 µm Lg = 0.1µm

Gate electrode

Si substrate

Gate oxide

MOSFETs with 1.5 nm gate oxide

44

G

S D

Lg

Page 45: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Vg = 2.0V

1.5 V

1.0 V

0.5 V

0.0 V

1.6

1.2

0.8

0.4

0.0

-0.40.0 0.5 1.0 1.5

Vd (V)

Vg = 2.0V

1.5 V

1.0 V

0.5 V

0.0 V

1.6

1.2

0.8

0.4

0.0

-0.40.0 0.5 1.0 1.5

Vd (V)

Vg = 2.0V

1.5 V

1.0 V

0.5 V

0.0 V

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.0

-0.10.0 0.5 1.0 1.5

Vd (V)

Vg = 2.0V

1.5 V

1.0 V

0.5 V

0.0 V

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.0

-0.10.0 0.5 1.0 1.5

Vd (V)

Vg = 2.0V

1.5 V

1.0 V

0.5 V

0.0 V

0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02

0.00

-0.020.0 0.5 1.0 1.5

Vd (V)

Vg = 2.0V

1.5 V

1.0 V

0.5 V

0.0 V

0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02

0.00

-0.020.0 0.5 1.0 1.5

Vd (V)

Vg = 2.0V

1.5 V

1.0 V

0.5 V

0.0 V

0.03

0.02

0.01

0.00

0.01

-0.40.0 0.5 1.0 1.5

Vd (V)

Id (m

A/ μ

m)

Vg = 2.0V

1.5 V

1.0 V

0.5 V

0.0 V

0.03

0.02

0.01

0.00

0.01

-0.40.0 0.5 1.0 1.5

Vd (V)

Id (m

A/ μ

m)

Lg = 10 µm Lg = 5 µm Lg = 1.0 µm Lg = 0.1µm

Gate leakage: Ig ∝ Gate Area ∝ Gate length (Lg)

Id

Drain current: Id ∝ 1/Gate length (Lg)Lg small,

Then, Ig small, Id large, Thus, Ig/Id very small

45

G

S D

Ig Id

Page 46: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Never Give Up!

There would be a solution!

Think, Think, and Think!

Or, Wait the time!Some one will think for you

No one knows future!

Do not believe a text book statement, blindly!

46

Page 47: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Qi Xinag, ECS 2004, AMD47

Page 48: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Gate Oxd

Channel

Electronwavelength

10 nm

Channel length?Downsizing limit?

48

Page 49: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

5 nm gate length CMOS

H. Wakabayashi et.al, NEC

IEDM, 2003

Length of 18 Si atoms

Is a Real Nano Device!!

5 nm

49

Page 50: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Gate Oxd

Channel

Electronwavelength

10 nm

Tunnelingdistance

3 nm

Atomdistance

0.3 nm

Channel lengthGate oxide thickness

Downsizing limit!

50

Page 51: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Electronwavelength

10 nm

Tunnelingdistance

3 nm

Atomdistance

0.3 nm

MOSFET operation

Lg = 2 ~ 1.5 nm?Below this, no one knows future!

Prediction now!

51

Page 52: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Maybe, practical limit around 5 nm.

Vg

Id

Vth (Threshold Voltage)

Vg=0V

SubthreshouldLeakage Current

When Gate length Smaller, Subthrehold Leakage Current Larger

Subthreshold CurrentIs OK at Single Tr.

But not OKFor Billions of Trs.

ONOFF

52

Page 53: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

53

Vg (V)

Log Id

10-6A10-7A10-8A10-9A10-10A

Vg = 0VVthVth

Subthresholdleakage currentincrease Vth lowering

We have to reduce theSupply voltage.

Then Vth should be lowered.

Page 54: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Electronwavelength

10 nm

Tunnelingdistance

3 nm

Atomdistance

0.3 nm

MOSFET operationLg = 2 ~ 1.5 nm?

Below this, no one knows future!

Prediction now!

Practical limit for integrationLg = 5 nm?

54

Page 55: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Ultimate limitation

10-5

10-4

10-3

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

1970 1990 2010 2030 2050

MPU LgJunction depthGate oxide thickness

Direct-tunneling

ITRS Roadmap(at introduction)

Wave length of electron

Distance between Si atomsSize

(µm

), Vo

ltage

(V)

Min. V supply

10 nm3 nm

0.3 nm

ULTIMATELIMIT

However,Gate oxide thickne2 orders magnitude smaller

Close to limitation!!

Lg: Gate length downsizing will continue to another 10-15 years 55

Page 56: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

By Robert Chau, IWGI 200

0.8 nm Gate Oxide Thickness MOSFETs operat

0.8 nm: Distance of 3 Si atoms!!

56

Page 57: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

So, we are now in the limitation of downsizing?

Do you believe this or do not?

57

Page 58: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

There is a solution!To use high-k dielectrics

Thin gate SiO2Thick gate high-k dielectrics

Almost the same electric characteristics

However, very difficult and big challenge!Remember MOSFET had not been realizedwithout Si/SiO2!

K: Dielectric Constan

Thick

Small leakageCurrent

58

Page 59: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Historical Trend of New Material for Gate Stack

1st FET LSIPMOS

NMOS CMOSIC

Gate insulator

Gate electrode

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 05

MOSFETGate Stackin production

SiO2 SiOxNy

DoublePoly SiAl N+Poly Si

Silicide above Poly Si electrode TiSi2 CoSi2WSi2MoSi2 NiSi

MOSFET

DRAM Capacitor

NV Memory

Analog/RF

Al2O3, ZrO2

Ni3Si4 Stack NO(Si3N4/SiO2) R&D for high-k

NO, AO (Al2O3/SiO2)

Recent new high-kPure Si Period

(O)NO, Si3N4

(O)NO, Ni3Si4 Ta2O5 , Al2O3,

Ta2O5 ,

Hfbase

DoubleMetal

59

Page 60: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

R. Hauser, IEDM Short Course, 1999Hubbard and Schlom, J Mater Res 11 2757 (1996)

● Gas or liquidat 1000 K

●H

○Radio activeHe

● ● ● ● ● ●Li Be

B C N O F Ne① ● ● ● ●NaMg Al Si P S Cl Ar

② ① ① ① ① ① ① ① ① ① ① ● ● ● ●K Ca Sc Ti V Cr Mn Fc Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge As Se Br Kr● ① ① ① ① ① ● ① ① ① ① ① ● ●Rh Sr Y Zr Nb Mo Tc Ru Rb Pd Ag Cd In Sn Sb Te I Xe● ③ ① ① ① ① ① ● ● ● ● ① ① ○ ○ ○Cs Ba ★ Hf Ta W Re Os Ir Pt Au Hg Tl Pb Bi Po At Rn○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○Fr Ra ☆ Rf Ha Sg Ns Hs Mt

○La Ce Pr Nd PmSmEuGdTbDyHoEr TmYb Lu○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○Ac Th Pa U Np Pu AmCm Bk Cf Es Fm Md No Lr

Candidates

● ●Na Al Si P S Cl Ar

② ① ① ① ① ① ① ① ① ① ● ● ● ●K Sc Ti V Cr Mn Fc Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge As Se Br Kr● ① ① ① ① ① ● ① ①

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○Ac Th Pa U Np Pu AmCm Bk Cf Es Fm Md No Lr

Unstable at Si interfaceSi + MOX M + SiO2①

Si + MOX MSiX + SiO2

Si + MOX M + MSiXOY

Choice of High-k elements for oxide

HfO2 based dielectrics are selected as the first generation materials, because of their merit in1) band-offset, 2) dielectric constant3) thermal stability

La2O3 based dielectrics are thought to be the next generation materials, which may not need a thicker interfacial layer

60

Page 61: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

0 10 20 30 40 50Dielectric Constant

4

2

0

-2

-4

-6

SiO2

Ban

d D

isco

ntin

uity

[eV]

Si

XPS measurement by Prof. T. Hattori, INFOS 2003

Conduction band offset vs. Dielectric Constan

Band offset

Oxide

Leakage Current by Tunneling

61

Page 62: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

62

Intel’s announcement, January 26, 2007, and IEDM Dec 2007

Hafnium-based high-k material by ALD: EOT= 1nmSpecific gate metals ( Intel’s trade secret)

Different Metals for NMOS and PMOSUse of 193nm dry lithography

From 65 nm to 45 nm Tech.Tr density: 2 times increaseTr switching power: 30% reduction Tr switching speed: 20% improvementS-D leakage power: 5 times reductionGate oxide leakage: 10 times reduction

45nm processors (Core™2 family processors "Penryn") running Windows* Vista*, Linux* etc.

45nm production in the second half of 2007

Page 63: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

63

PMOS

High-k gate insulator MOSFETs for Intel: EOT=1nm

EOT: Equivalent Oxide Thickness

Page 64: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

64

History and future of TransistorShrinking, Shrinking, and Shrinking!

Integration density: 1/L2 Increase

Switching speed CV/I Decrease

C, V ∝ L

Power consumption CV2/2 Decrease

C: Capacitance V: Voltage

1970

Gate lengthGate Oxd Thickness

10,000 nm200725 nm

100 nm 1 nm

and then, Shrinking, Shrinking, and Shrinking!

Page 65: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

65Year

Pow

er p

er M

OSF

ET (P

)

P∝L

g 3

(Scaling)

EOT Limit0.7~0.8 nm

EOT=0.5nm

TodayEOT=1.0nm

Now

45nm nodeLg=22nm

One order of Magnitude

Si

HfO2

Metal

SiO2/SiON

Si

High-k

Metal

Direct ContactOf high-k and Si

Si

MetalSiO2/SiON

0.5~0.7nm

Introduction of High-kStill SiO2 or SiONIs used at Si interface

For the past 45 yearsSiO2 and SiON

For gate insulator

EOT can be reduced further beyond 0.5 nm by using direct contact to SiBy choosing appropriate materials and processes.

Page 66: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

66

R. Hauser, IEDM Short Course, 1999Hubbard and Schlom, J Mater Res 11 2757 (1996)

● Gas or liquidat 1000 K

●H

○Radio activeHe

● ● ● ● ● ●Li Be

B C N O F Ne① ● ● ● ●NaMg Al Si P S Cl Ar

② ① ① ① ① ① ① ① ① ① ① ● ● ● ●K Ca Sc Ti V Cr Mn Fc Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge As Se Br Kr● ① ① ① ① ① ● ① ① ① ① ① ● ●Rh Sr Y Zr Nb Mo Tc Ru Rb Pd Ag Cd In Sn Sb Te I Xe● ③ ① ① ① ① ① ● ● ● ● ① ① ○ ○ ○Cs Ba ★ Hf Ta W Re Os Ir Pt Au Hg Tl Pb Bi Po At Rn○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○Fr Ra ☆ Rf Ha Sg Ns Hs Mt

○La Ce Pr Nd PmSmEuGdTbDyHoEr TmYb Lu○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○Ac Th Pa U Np Pu AmCm Bk Cf Es Fm Md No Lr

Candidates

● ●Na Al Si P S Cl Ar

② ① ① ① ① ① ① ① ① ① ● ● ● ●K Sc Ti V Cr Mn Fc Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge As Se Br Kr● ① ① ① ① ① ● ① ①

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○Ac Th Pa U Np Pu AmCm Bk Cf Es Fm Md No Lr

Unstable at Si interfaceSi + MOX M + SiO2①

Si + MOX MSiX + SiO2

Si + MOX M + MSiXOY

Choice of High-k elements for oxide

HfO2 based dielectrics are selected as the first generation materials, because of their merit in1) band-offset, 2) dielectric constant3) thermal stability

La2O3 based dielectrics are thought to be the next generation materials, which may not need a thicker interfacial layer

Page 67: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

1.E-05

1.E-04

1.E-03

1.E-02

1.E-01

1.E+00

1.E+01

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

EOT ( nm )

Cur

rent

den

sity

( A

/cm

2 )Al2O3HfAlO(N)HfO2HfSiO(N)HfTaOLa2O3Nd2O3Pr2O3PrSiOPrTiOSiON/SiNSm2O3SrTiO3Ta2O5TiO2ZrO2(N)ZrSiOZrAlO(N)

Gate Leakage vs EOT, (Vg=|1|V)

La2O3

HfO2

67

Page 68: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

EOT = 0.48 nmTransistor with La2O3 gate insulator

Our results

68

Page 69: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

69

0.0E+00

5.0E-04

1.0E-03

1.5E-03

2.0E-03

2.5E-03

3.0E-03

3.5E-03

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Vg=0VVg=0.2VVg=0.4VVg=0.6VVg=0.8VVg=1.0VVg=1.2V

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Vg=0VVg=0.2VVg=0.4VVg=0.6VVg=0.8VVg=1.0VVg=1.2V

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Vg=0VVg=0.2VVg=0.4VVg=0.6VVg=0.8VVg=1.0VVg=1.2VI d

(V)

W/L = 50µm /2.5µm

Vd (V) Vd (V) Vd (V)

EOT=0.37nm

Vth=-0.04VVth=-0.05VVth=-0.06V

EOT=0.37nm EOT=0.40nm EOT=0.48nmW/L = 50µm /2.5µm W/L = 50µm /2.5µm

0.48 0.37nm Increase of Id at 30%

La2O3

Page 70: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

New material research will give us many future possibilities and the most importantfor Nano-CMOS!

New material for Metal gate electrodeNew material for High-k gate dielectric

New materialFor Metal S/D

New channel material

Not only for high-k!

70

Page 71: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

magnification

6 µm NMOS LSI in 1974

5. S/D

Layers

3. Gate oxide

1. Si substrate2. Field oxide

4. Poly Si

6. Interlayer7. Aluminum 8. Passivation

Si substrate

Field SiO2

ILD (InterlayerDielectrics)

Al interconnects

Passivation (PSG)

(SiO2 + BPSG)Si substrate

Field SiO2

ILD (InterlayerDielectrics)

Al interconnects

Passivation (PSG)

(SiO2 + BPSG)

Poly Si gate electrode

Gate SiO2

Source / Drain

Poly Si gate electrode

Gate SiO2

Source / Drain

Materials1. Si

3. BPSG

5. PSG4. Al

2. SiO2

Atoms1. Si

4. B

(H, N, Cl)

2. O3. P

5. Al

71

Page 72: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Y. Nishi, Si Nano Workshop, 2006,

(S. Sze, Based on invited talk at Stanford Univ., Aug. 1999)

Al

SiO2

Si

Poly Si

Si3N4

Air

HSQ

Polymer

TiN

TaN

Cu

Low-kdielectrics

Metals

La2O3

Ta2O5

HfO2

ZrO2

ZrSixOy

RuO2

Pt

IrO2

Y1

PZT

BST

High-kdielectrics

Electrode materials

Ferroelectrics

PtSi2WSi2CoSi2TiSi2MoSi2TaSi2

Silicides

W

1970 1980 1990 20001950 2010

Al

SiO2

Si

Ge SemiconductorsIII-V

Just examples!Many other candidatesNew materials

NiSi silicide

SiGe Semiconductor

72

Page 73: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Perc

enta

ge o

f are

a in

SoC

[%]

2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 20160

20

40

60

80

100

Year

Memory

Logic

Due to design productivity, yield, and power

ITRS’ 2000: Y, Nishi, Si Nano Workshop, 2006

Memory area will increase

73

Page 74: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

32 Gb and 16Gb NAND, SAMSUNG

Now: After 45 Years from the 1st single MOSFE

74

Page 75: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Capacity Node 1st FabricationProduction

512Mbit 120nm 2000 2001

1Gbit 100nm 2001 2002

2Gbit 90nm 2002 2003

4Gbit 70nm 2003 2004

8Gbit 60nm 2004 2005

16Gbit 50nm 2005 2006

32Gbit 40nm

256Gbit 20nm

Even Tbit would be possible in future!

Samsung’s NAND flash trend

75

Page 76: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Already 32 Gbit: larger than that of world populationcomparable for the numbers of neuronsin human brain

Samsung announced 256 Gbit will be produced in 2010.Only 4 years from now.256Gbit: larger than those of # of stars in galaxies

76

Page 77: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Moore’s Law & More

More Moore and More than Moore

http://strj-jeita.elisasp.net/pdf_ws_2005nendo/9A_WS2005IRC_Ishiuchi.pdf

ITRS 2005 EditionQuestion what is the other side of the cloud? 77

Page 78: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

We could keep the Moore’s law after 2020Without downswing the gate length

What is Moore’s law.to increase the number (#) of Tr. In a chip

Now, # of Tr. in a chip is limited by power.key issue is to reduce the power.to reduce the supply voltage is still effective

To develop devices with sufficiently high drain current under low supply voltage is important.

78

Page 79: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

F.-L.Yang, VLSI2004

FinFET to Nanowire

Ion/Ioff=230000Ion/Ioff=52200

Channel conductance is well controlled by Gateeven at L=5nm

79

Page 80: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Selection of MOSFET structure for high conduction:Nano-wire or Nano-tube FETs is promising

3 methods to realize High-conduction at Low voltageM1.Use 1D ballistic conduction

M2.Increase number of quantum channel

M3.Increase the number of wire or tube per area3D integration of wire and tubes

For suppression of Ioff, the Nanowire/tube is also good.80

Page 81: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

1D conduction per one quantum channel:G = 2e2/h = 77.8 µS/wire or tuberegardless of gate length and channel material

That is 77.8 µA/wire at 1V supply

This an extremely high value

However, already 20mA/wire was obtained experimentaly by Samsung

81

Page 82: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

1

10

100

1000

10000

0 1000 2000 3000 4000

bulkFinFETSiNWFETGeNWFETITRS(Planer)ITRS(SOI)ITRS(DG)

Bulk

DG

dia~3nm

dia~10nm

ITRS (SOI)

ITRS (DG)

ITRS(Bulk)

Si Nanowire

Ion (uA/um)

Ioff

(nA

/um

)

1

10

100

1000

10000

0 1000 2000 3000 4000

bulkFinFETSiNWFETGeNWFETITRS(Planer)ITRS(SOI)ITRS(DG)

1

10

100

1000

10000

0 1000 2000 3000 4000

bulkFinFETSiNWFETGeNWFETITRS(Planer)ITRS(SOI)ITRS(DG)

Bulk

DG

dia~3nm

dia~10nm

ITRS (SOI)

ITRS (DG)

ITRS(Bulk)

Si Nanowire

Ion (uA/um)

Ioff

(nA

/um

)Off Current

82

Page 83: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Increase the Number of quantum channels

Energy band of Bulk Si

Eg

By Prof. Shiraishi of Tsukuba univ.

Energy band of 3 x 3 Si wire

4 channels can be used

Eg

83

Page 84: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Maximum number of wires per 1 µm

Surrounded gate type MOS

Front gate type MOS 165 wires /µm

33 wires/µm

High-k gate insulator (4nm)Si Nano wire (Diameter 2nm)

Metal gate electrode(10nm)

Surrounded gate MOS

30nm

6nm6nm pitchBy nano-imprint method

30nm pitch: EUV lithograpy

84

Page 85: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

SiSiGe

SiSiGe

...

Selective EtchingDry EtchingSi/SiGe multistacked wafer

H2 Annealing

SiSiGeSi

(c) Selective Etching

(b) Dry Etching(a) Si/SiGe/Siepitaxial wafer

(d) H2 Annealing

(e) Gate Oxide (f) Gate, S/D Formation

SiSiGeSi

(c) Selective Etching

(b) Dry Etching(a) Si/SiGe/Siepitaxial wafer

(d) H2 Annealing

(e) Gate Oxide (f) Gate, S/D Formation

Increase the number of wires towards vertical dimension

85

Page 86: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

2015 2020 2025 2030 20352015 2020 2025 2030 2035

Cloud

Beyond the horizon

2010

?More Moore

ITRS Beyond CMOS

? ? ?? ? ? More Moore ??

ITRS

PJT(2007~2012)

2007

Horizon

Extended CMOS: More Moore + CMOS logic

Ribbon

Tube

Extended CMOS

Si Fin, Tri-gate

Si Nano wire

III-V及びGe Nano wire

製品段階

開発段階

研究段階

Production

Research

Development

Natural direction of downsizing

Diameter = 2nm

Si Channel

Nanowire

Tube, Ribbon

Selection

-

Problem:Mechanical Stress, Roughness

1D - High conduction

More perfect crystal

CNT

Graphene

Diameter = 10nm Problem:Hiigh-k gate oxides, etching of III-V wire

Further higher conductionBy multi quantum channel Selection

Our new roadmap

High conductionBy 1D conduction

86

Page 87: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Scaling proceeds

Siz

e(Gate length etc)

Saturation of Downsizing

2020?

5 nm?

New Materials, New Process, New Structure(Logic, Memory)

Hybrid integration of different functional Chip Increase of SOC functionality

3D integration of memory cell3D integration of logic devices

Low cost for LSI processRevolution for CR,Equipment, Wafer

Miniaturization of Interconnects on PCB(Printed Circuit Board)

Introduction of algorithmof bio-systemBrain of insects, human

87

Page 88: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Brain Ultra small volumeSmall number of neuron cellsExtremely low power

Real time image processing(Artificial) Intelligence3D flight control

Sensor

InfraredHumidityCO2

Mosquito

Dragonfly is further highperformance

System andAlgorism becomes more important!

But do not know how?

88

Page 89: Future of NanoCMOS after Scaling Limit

Thank you for your attention!

89


Recommended