+ All Categories
Home > Documents > High feedstuffs costs: Improving nutritional value of swine diets by processing conditions

High feedstuffs costs: Improving nutritional value of swine diets by processing conditions

Date post: 03-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: milling-and-grain-magazine
View: 216 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 7

Transcript
  • 8/12/2019 High feedstuffs costs: Improving nutritional value of swine diets by processing conditions

    1/7

    Digital Re-print -May | June 2014

    High feedstuffs costs: Improving nutritionalvalue of swine diets by processing conditions

    www.gfmt.co.uk

    Grain & Feed Milling Technology is published six times a year by Perendale Publishers Ltd of the United Kingdom. All data is published in good faith, based on information received, and while every care is taken to prevent inaccuracies,the publishers accept no liability for any errors or omissions or for the consequences of action taken on the basis ofinformation published.Copyright 2014 Perendale Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any formor by any means without prior permission of the copyright owner. Printed by Perendale Publishers Ltd. ISSN: 1466-3872

    http://-/?-http://-/?-
  • 8/12/2019 High feedstuffs costs: Improving nutritional value of swine diets by processing conditions

    2/7

    ELEVATOR BUCKETS - ELEVATOR BOLTS

    The color blue, when used in connection with elevator buckets, is a U.S. registered trademark owned by Tapco Inc. 2014 Tapco Inc. All rights reserved.

    Tel.: +1 314 739 9191 Fax: +1 314 739 5880 Email: [email protected] www.tapcoinc.com

    For over 40 years, and in more than50 countries, Tapco has been solving the problem ofbent & torn steel buckets.

    S TYLE CC-HD (H EAVY D UTY )Polyethylene Elevator Bucket

    Also available in Polyurethane & Nylon

    T apco nonmetallic buckets have the ability to absorb impact in theelevator leg and give or yield to bypass an obstruction thenreturn to their original shape and keep on working for you.

    Tapco buckets weigh less than their pressed steel counterparts, lack sharp edgesand therefore are far safer and easier to handle when fitting an elevator.

    With 900,000 buckets in 93 sizes stocked throughout the world,Tapco has what you want, when you need it! Tapco also maintainsover 15 million elevator bolts in imperial and metric threads in six

    styles. Tapco fanged elevator bolts have been specifically designedto work with nonmetallic buckets.

    Contact Tapco or visit www.tapcoinc.com today.

    Replace your steel buckets with Tapco the buckets with the memory .

    F ANGED H EAD Elevator Bolt

    Have You Experienced This In Your Elevator?

    http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/http://www.tapcoinc.com/
  • 8/12/2019 High feedstuffs costs: Improving nutritional value of swine diets by processing conditions

    3/7

    Pig production costs have increasedmore than 10 percent duringthe last five years, primari-

    ly due to higher feedstuff prices.

    Feed costs contribute more than 60percent of total pig production costs (in

    the USA and Brazil even as high as 70-75percent, respectively (LEI, 2013)).

    As feed milling affects the dietary nutri- tional value and feed efficiency of pigs,profit over feeds costs can be improved byoptimising the feed milling process.

    The effects of processing of feed on itsnutritional value are highly underestimated.Profit of animal production in the end isdetermined by both feed production costsand animal performance. Both should bothbe optimised to get the highest return oninvestment, as the highest feed mill through-put will probably not result in the best

    technical quality of the feed.On the other hand the best technical

    quality might not be needed for maximisednutritional value or optimal pig performance.

    Feed millers have a very large tool box tooptimise technical quality of the feed.

    Here, attention is paid to grinding andcompacting (or pelleting), which are the

    tools that have the higher impact on nutri- tional quality of feed, assuming that dosingand mixing will be done with the rightaccuracy.

    Grinding for optimal particle sizeIn pigs it is consistently shown, oppo-

    sitely to broiler production, that reduction ofdietary particle size improves daily gain andfeed conversion rate (FCR).

    Goodband et al. (1993) reported thatFCR improved by more than five per-cent when reducing feed particle size from767m to 634m (dgw, dry sieving) of cornin meal diets and Rojas et al. (2013) dem-onstrated that reducing particle size of corn-

    based diets improves nutrient digestibilityand energy value of feedstuffs by increasingsurface area (see Figure 2).

    The type and intensity of grinding (rollermills verses hammer mills) has an impact notonly on particle size distribution, but also onparticle shape, bulk density and surface area.These are additional criteria to considerwhen evaluating the impact of grinding pro-cess on digestibility and animal performance.

    At this point, it is important to realize that, although optimal feed particle sizeranges from 500-700m, there is no singleoptimum value as the optimum depends on

    type of raw material (for example, type ofcereals, soybean meal, DDGS), feed form(mash verses pellet), age of the animal(piglet, growing/finishing pig, sow) and healthstatus.

    Despite the linear increase in feedingvalue by reduced feed particle size (seeFigure 2), too small particles are disadvanta-geous as they might cause gastric ulcers.

    In addition, fine grinding requires highenergy inputs.

    Effects of cereal type and feed form onpig performance were studied by Gidley et

    al. (2012). They showed that particle size,especially the coarser fractions, had largerimpact than feed form in barley and sorghumdiets (see Figure 3).

    From grinding to pelletingGrinding and pelleting are tools that

    interact: At one side grinding affects pel-let quality and on the other side pelletingreduces particle size further. The effects ofgrinding on pellet quality are discussed atend of this paper.

    The pelleting step is considered a sec-ondary grinding. It has been shown that the

    percentage of coarse fraction (> 1.4mm)is reduced by 15 percent in coarse mealdiets after pelleting, and the fine fraction(

  • 8/12/2019 High feedstuffs costs: Improving nutritional value of swine diets by processing conditions

    4/7

    by more than five percent, com-pared to meal diets, as shownboth in nursery pigs and in grow-ing-finishing pigs.

    This effect, however, isdependent on the conditioning

    time and temperature and shearforces during pelleting.

    There is little consensus about the reason for increased per-formance in pigs fed pelleteddiets. Some argue it is becauseof increased bulk density andpalatability, which is not in agree-ment with decreased feed intakeobserved in some cases. Othersclaim that a higher growth is due

    to higher nutrient digestibility due to starch gelatinisation and pro- tein denaturation.

    Crumbled pellets, conditionedat 90C improved feed efficiencyby 5.2 percent compared to mealdiets in five weeks-slaughter pigs

    fed wheat-barley-corn baseddiets, whereas expandate feed(120C) resulted in lower benefitover mash and crumbled pellet(Millet et al., 2012).

    In nursery pigs, total tractdigestibility of protein and energyimproves when feeds are condi-

    tioned and pelleted or extruded.Lundblad et al. (2011) showed

    that there was no additional ben-efit of expanding over steam pel-

    leting at 47C or 90C on feedefficiency.

    However, extrusion in spiteof having reduced feed intake,probably caused by low bulkdensity, resulted in increasedpiglets performance, due tohigher nutrient digestibilities.

    Pellet quality (PDI) has alarge impact on production per-formance of pigs.

    When percent finesexceeds more than 20 percentat feeder, benefits of pelletingwill be much smaller. Main fac-

    tors affecting PDI and their rel-evance are indicated in Figure 5.

    Formulation-size-specification

    Diet formulation: Experiencednutritionists and feed millersknow that wheat-based dietsresult in better PDI compared

    to corn-based diets; increasingprotein content improves PDI,and specific protein sources, suchas soybean isolates have largereffect (Briggs et al., 1999).

    Different fiber can haveopposite results: adding fivepercent of cellulose may havepositive effect, whereas ligninat same amount has detrimen-

    tal effect (Buchanan & Moritz,2009).

    Figure 2: The metabolise energy (Kcal ME/kg DM) increase byreduction of particle size in corn-based diets fed as meal inbarrows (29kg BW) (Source: Modified from Rojas et al., 2013)

    Figure 3: Effect of grain type, feed particle size (regrindingof particles with size >1.8mm or >0.9mm in barley andsorghum respectively) and feed form (mash verses pellet)on FCR in growing pigs

    May - June 2014 | 43GRAIN& FEED MILLING TECHNOLOGY F

    http://www.zhengchang.com/
  • 8/12/2019 High feedstuffs costs: Improving nutritional value of swine diets by processing conditions

    5/7

    DDGs have variable effect on PDI,depending on particle size, fiber and proteincontent. Several authors (Feoli, 2008 andKnauer et al., 2013) found that adding 30percent DDGs increased PDI, whereasother studies show a decreased pelletdurability when increasing inclusion level in

    the diets (Fahrenholz et al., 2013, Loar etal., 2010).

    Particle size: Reduction of particle sizeimproves pellet quality (PDI) as has beenshown in some studies: in corn-soy diets,reduction from 1000m to 400m improvedPDI from 79 to 86 percent/m (Wondra etal., 1995) and from 543m to 233m thePDI improvement was up to 99 percent(Stark, 1994).

    Similar results were found by Knauer

    et al. (2013)when reducing particle size of soybean meal

    to 450m.In the case of DDGS, it has not been

    shown clear improvement of PDI by reduc-ing particle size whereas it seems there isa benefit of when DDGS have been previ-

    ously pelleted in origin and re-grinded in thefeedmill.

    Conditioning and die specifications: con-sidering a range of particle size of the mashbetween 500-700m, the conditioning tem-perature should range between 60C to 80C

    to achieve good PDI (fines 10 percent).In general, pig diets are pelleted at 4mm,

    but hole length varies considerably amongregions and feedmillers, from 4x40 up to4x60/70.

    The selection of the die (diameter andactive hole lengths) is upon diet formula-

    tion and target PDI. It seems obvious that when hole length is increased, PDIis improved but production (tonne/hour)is decreased and energy consumptionincreased. The economical optimum atfeed mill may not fit with the optimum foranimal production.

    Take home messages- Profit over feeds costs can be improved

    by optimising the feed milling process.Optimising nutrient utilisation by theanimal has a tremendous impact in pigproduction costs

    - The optimal feed particle size rangesbetween 500-700m (dgw), butdepends on type of raw material, feedform, age of the animal and healthstatus

    - Particle size and feed form affect feedintake and feed efficiency. Bulk densityand percent fines or PDI should be

    accounted for to optimise animalperformance

    - Pelleting improves feed efficiency bymore than five percent compared tomeal diets, providing a good pelletquality The benefit of more intense thermal

    treatment, such as expansion is not clear.Extrusion process may increase digestibil-

    ity of nutrients in nursery pigs but attention to feed intake should be paid.

    Figure 4: Effect of feed structure on performanceof growing-finishing (five weeks-slaughter) pigs fedwheat-barley-maize-soya diets.

    44 | May - June 2014 GRAIN& FEED MILLING TECHNOLOGY

    Turning ideas into opportunities.PROGRESSIVE AQUAFEED PROCESSING

    Imagine the possibilities

    wenger.com

    BELGIUM TAIWAN BRASIL CHINA TURKEY INDIA

    Leave it to Wenger to redene aquatic feed productionvia twin screw extrusion. Based on the proven Wenger

    Magnum twin-screw series, the new TX-3000 features

    barrel geometries that allow greater capacities thanany other extruder in its class.

    The combined features allow increased production capacity of up to 30 percent compared to previousand competitive aquatic machines totallyredening cost/benet. The TX-3000 can be equipped

    with either the High Intensity Preconditioner (HIP) orthe High-Shear Conditioner (HSC) to match specic

    process and capacity requirements, making it ideal

    for processing a full range of aquatic feed products.Contact us now. With new concepts and visionaryleadership, were ready to help you selectthe right tools for your extrusion anddrying needs.

    Our business in life is not to get ahead of others, but to get ahead of ourselves.Stewart B. Johnson, Dutch Artist

    TX-3000 RAISES THE BAR ON AQUATIC FEED PRODUCTION

    i

    http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.wenger.com/http://www.vigan.com/
  • 8/12/2019 High feedstuffs costs: Improving nutritional value of swine diets by processing conditions

    6/7

    VIGAN Engineering s.a. Rue de lIndustrie, 16 1400 Nivelles (Belgium)Tl.: +32 67 89 50 41 Fax : +32 67 89 50 60 www.vigan.com [email protected]

    A win-win solutionbetween customer expertise and VIGAN know-how

    Pneumatic or MechanicalShip Loaders & Unloaders

    Port Equipment - Turnkey Projects

    NIV: up to 800 tons/hour Average efciency 75%-80%

    A l l

    t y p e s o f g r a i

    n

    http://www.vigan.com/http://www.vigan.com/http://www.vigan.com/http://www.vigan.com/http://www.vigan.com/http://www.vigan.com/http://www.vigan.com/http://www.vigan.com/http://www.vigan.com/http://www.vigan.com/http://www.vigan.com/http://www.vigan.com/http://www.vigan.com/http://www.vigan.com/http://www.vigan.com/http://www.vigan.com/http://www.vigan.com/http://www.vigan.com/http://www.vigan.com/http://www.vigan.com/http://www.vigan.com/http://www.vigan.com/http://www.vigan.com/http://www.vigan.com/http://www.vigan.com/http://www.vigan.com/http://www.vigan.com/http://www.vigan.com/http://www.vigan.com/http://www.vigan.com/
  • 8/12/2019 High feedstuffs costs: Improving nutritional value of swine diets by processing conditions

    7/7

    www.gfmt.co.uk

    LINKS See the full issue Visit the GFMT website

    Contact the GFMT Team

    Subscribe to GFMT

    A subscription magazine for the global flour & feed milling industries - first published in 1891INCORPORATING PORTS, DISTRIBUTION AND FORMULATION

    In this issue:

    Role ofextrudersin Halal foodproduction

    FortificationFortification in

    rice and flour

    IAOM118th AnnualConference &Expo

    M a y - J u n e

    2 0 1 4

    GM soybeansThe on-farm facts

    Harvestconditions:wheat qualityand addressingissues

    The Mills ArchiveGFMT becomes apatron

    first published in 1891

    This digital Re-print is part of the May | June 2014 edition of Grain & FeedMilling Technology magazine.Content from the magazine is available to view free-of-charge, both as a fullonline magazine on our website, and as an archive of individual features onthe docstoc website.Please click here to view our other publications on www.docstoc.com .

    To purchase a paper copy of the magazine, or to subscribe to the paper edi-tion please contact our Circulation and Subscriptions Manager on the linkadove.

    INFORMATION FOR ADVERTISERS - CLICK HERE

    Article reprintsAll Grain & Feed Milling Tecchnology feature articles can be re-printed as a 4 or 8 page booklets (thesehave been used as point of sale materials, promotional materials for shows and exhibitions etc).

    If you are interested in getting this article re-printed please c ontact t he GFMT team for more informa- tion on - Tel: +44 1242 267707 - Email: [email protected] or visit www.gfmt.co.uk/reprints

    http://www.gfmt.co.uk/http://www.gfmt.co.uk/archive.phphttp://www.gfmt.co.uk/http://www.gfmt.co.uk/contact.phphttp://www.gfmt.co.uk/subscriptions.phphttp://www.docstoc.com/profile/Perendalehttp://www.gfmt.co.uk/advertising.phpmailto:[email protected]://www.gfmt.co.uk/reprintsmailto:[email protected]://www.gfmt.co.uk/reprintshttp://www.gfmt.co.uk/reprintsmailto:[email protected]://www.gfmt.co.uk/advertising.phphttp://www.docstoc.com/profile/Perendalehttp://www.gfmt.co.uk/subscriptions.phphttp://www.gfmt.co.uk/contact.phphttp://www.gfmt.co.uk/http://www.gfmt.co.uk/archive.phphttp://www.gfmt.co.uk/

Recommended