+ All Categories
Home > News & Politics > Marcellus Shale Coalition 2012 Year-End Workforce Survey

Marcellus Shale Coalition 2012 Year-End Workforce Survey

Date post: 01-Jul-2015
Category:
Upload: marcellus-drilling-news
View: 342 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
The results of an annual survey conducted by the Marcellus Shale Coalition (MSC) of its member companies. The survey identifies the types of companies hiring in the shale industry, where they are hiring, and the types of people they are hiring. It also identifies the kinds of jobs and services they outsource. This year's survey is tabulated from 101 MSC member companies participating. Bottom line: Marcellus and Utica Shale is creating a job surge in the northeast.
17
MSC 2012 Year-End Workforce Survey August 20, 2013 1 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION
Transcript
Page 1: Marcellus Shale Coalition 2012 Year-End Workforce Survey

MSC 2012 Year-End Workforce Survey

August 20, 2013

1 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION

Page 2: Marcellus Shale Coalition 2012 Year-End Workforce Survey

Responses

Best response rate since workforce survey initiated: 101 member companies

• 83% of executive board member companies • 67% of board member companies • 29% of associate member companies

Representing 13,099 employees dedicated to Marcellus & Utica Shale regions

2 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION

Page 3: Marcellus Shale Coalition 2012 Year-End Workforce Survey

% Distribution of New Hires in 2012

8.4%

13.2%

10.8%

3.9%

29.8%

1.3%

3.6%

20.3%

1.1% 1.9% 3.3% 2.5%

3 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION

Page 4: Marcellus Shale Coalition 2012 Year-End Workforce Survey

96% of New Hires originated from Marcellus/Utica Shale States in 2012

56.8%

12.7%

19.0%

2.0% 5.3% 4.2%

Pennsylvania West Virginia Ohio Maryland New York Other

4 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION

Page 5: Marcellus Shale Coalition 2012 Year-End Workforce Survey

Of the most difficult positions to fill in 2012

• 49% were professional

• 15% were management

5 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION

Page 6: Marcellus Shale Coalition 2012 Year-End Workforce Survey

Positions most difficult to fill in 2012

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Management/Executive Professional Business Support Technicians Operators

6 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION

Page 7: Marcellus Shale Coalition 2012 Year-End Workforce Survey

Top Three Challenges

• Qualified Talent (knowledge and experience)

• Competition for Qualified Talent

• Willingness to relocate

7 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION

Page 8: Marcellus Shale Coalition 2012 Year-End Workforce Survey

Recruitment Challenges

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70R

esis

tanc

e to

relo

catin

g to

Mar

cellu

s/U

tica

area

s

Com

pens

atio

n

Qua

lity

of li

fe

Indu

stry

Per

cept

ion

Typ

e of

wor

k / w

ork

cond

ition

Fai

led

back

grou

nd s

cree

ning

Fai

led

pre-

empl

oym

ent d

rug

test

Significant Somewhat Not at all

8 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION

Page 9: Marcellus Shale Coalition 2012 Year-End Workforce Survey

Approximately 4000 new hires expected in 2013 …. in which locations?

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

9 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION

Page 10: Marcellus Shale Coalition 2012 Year-End Workforce Survey

Approximately 4000 new hires expected in 2013 …. in which functions?

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Management/Executive Professional Business Support Technicians Operators

10 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION

Page 11: Marcellus Shale Coalition 2012 Year-End Workforce Survey

Outsourcing – which functions/services?

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Some/Partial No Yes

11 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION

Page 12: Marcellus Shale Coalition 2012 Year-End Workforce Survey

We need 4-year degree programs beyond what is currently available …

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Hea

lth a

nd S

afet

y

Fina

nce

and

Busi

ness

Pip

elin

e En

gine

erin

g

Envi

ronm

enta

l/Reg

ulat

ory

– em

phas

is o

n Ai

r Qua

lity

Pet

role

um T

echn

olog

y

Geo

logy

Saf

ety

Eng

inee

ring

Phy

sica

l Sci

ence

s

Info

rmat

ion

Tech

nolo

gy

Hum

an R

esou

rces

Gov

ernm

ent a

nd P

ublic

Affa

irs

Do not agree

Agree Somewhat

Agree Strongly

12 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION

Page 13: Marcellus Shale Coalition 2012 Year-End Workforce Survey

We need certificate programs beyond what is currently available…

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Sup

ervi

sory

Com

mun

icat

ion

– em

phas

is o

n w

ritin

g

Com

pute

r pro

ficie

ncy

Gen

eral

O&

G b

asic

s(i.

e. c

ultu

re, p

roce

ss)

Con

flict

Res

olut

ion

Lead

ersh

ip

Agree Strongly Somewhat Do not Agree

13 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION

Page 14: Marcellus Shale Coalition 2012 Year-End Workforce Survey

Diversity

80%

20%

76.20%

21.90%

White Non White Male Female

Compared to general population of PA : White, non-Hispanic: 83% Male: 53% Non White: 17% Female: 47%

14 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION

Page 15: Marcellus Shale Coalition 2012 Year-End Workforce Survey

Top Recruiting Methods

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%C

ompa

ny w

ebsi

te

Car

eer w

ebsi

te /

job

porta

l

Soc

ial m

edia

- lin

kedi

n,fa

cebo

ok, e

tc

New

spap

er

PA

Car

eerli

nk /o

nest

op

Ref

erra

l

Sch

ool/t

rain

ing

cent

er

15 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION

Page 16: Marcellus Shale Coalition 2012 Year-End Workforce Survey

Participants • Access Midstream • Accutest Laboratories • Anchor Drilling Fluids USA, Inc. • Apex Companies, LLC • Aqua • ARM Group Inc. • Atlas Energy LP • Baker Hughes • Bergmann Associates, Inc • Burleson LLP • Burnett Oil Co., Inc. • Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation • Carolyn Henn • Casella - CARES Water Treatment • Champion Technologies • Chesapeake Energy • Chevron • Chief Oil & Gas LLC • Cleveland Brothers Equipment Co. • CMS Energy • Columbia Pipeline Group • CONSOL Energy Inc. • D.A. Nolt, Inc. of PA • Deloitte LLP • Draeger Safety Inc • DTE Energy • E-Finity • Endeavour International • Energy Corporation of America • Entech Engineering, Inc. • Environmental Drilling Solutions, LLC • EQT Corporation • Eureka Resources, LLC

• Eurofins Lancaster Laboratories, Inc. • EXCO Resources (PA), LLC • FTS International • Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P. • Geosyntec Consultants • GES • Glenn O. Hawbaker, Inc. • Groundwater & Environmental Services

Inc. (GES) • Halliburton Energy Services, • Heckmann Water Resources • Hoffman Construction Services, LLC • HomeWaters • HRG, Inc. • Hull & Associates, Inc. • Hunt Marcellus Operating Company • K&L Gates LLP • Keane Group • Kelchner, Inc. • LJ Stein & Company, Inc • Manko, Gold, Katcher & Fox, LLP • MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P. • Mascaro Construction Company, L.P. • Mccarl's Inc. • McClure Company • McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC • McTish, Kunkel & Associates • Michael Baker Corporation • Mitsui E&P USA LLC • Marcellus Shale Coalition • NBL • New Pig Energy • Noble Energy

• Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc • Penn E&R • Percheron LLC • PVR Partners • Range Resources • Reserved Environmental Services, LLC • RETTEW Associates, Inc. • Ridge Global • RT Energy Services, • SAIC • Schneider Downs & Co., Inc. • Schramm Incorporated • Seneca Resources Corporation • Sevenson Environmental Services, Inc. • Shell • Southwestern Energy • SuitKote Corporation • SWCA Environmental Consultants

Talisman Energy USA Inc. • TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. • The Gateway Engineers, Inc. • The Keane Group • TRC • Triana Energy • Trumbull Energy Services Corporation • Twilight Services • Ultra Petroleum Corp. • Valerus • Weatherford • Weavertown Environmental Group • Weston Solutions, Inc. • Williams • WPX Energy • XTO Energy Inc.

16 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION

Page 17: Marcellus Shale Coalition 2012 Year-End Workforce Survey

Thank you!

Marcellus Shale Coalition

MarcellusCoalition.org

LearnAboutShale.org

ShaleInsight.com

Twitter.com/MarcellusGas

Facebook.com/MarcellusCoalition

17 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION


Recommended