+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Date post: 03-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: kristian-jenkins
View: 216 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
46
Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010
Transcript
Page 1: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Monitoring and EvaluatingSES Provider Programs

2009-2010

Page 2: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Overview

•Monitoring SES providers•Evaluating SES programs•Questions

Page 3: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)

The SEA is required to monitor the quality and effectiveness of the services offered by approved Supplemental Educational Services (SES) providers.

ESEA, Section 1116(e)(4)(D); 34 C.F.R. §200.47(c).

Page 4: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

SBE Policy

On September 30, 2009, the SBE approved the Supplemental Educational Services (SES) Evaluation Policy.

Page 5: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Monitoring SES Providers

Page 6: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Purpose of Monitoring

•Address requirements of SES providers as stipulated in ESEA; and •Verify compliance with narratives and assurances in the SES provider’s approved application.

Page 7: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Indicators

• Program Management• Instructional Program• Parent Communication• Health, Safety and Civil Rights

Laws• District Agreement• Online Provider Requirements

(when applicable)

Page 8: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Monitoring Visit

•On-site visit •Documentation review•Observation of tutoring session• Interview with tutor(s)

Page 9: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Prior to the VisitAt least five (5) days prior to the on-site monitoring visit, a Title I Consultant will:

• Notify the LEA Federal Programs director and/or the LEA’s SES coordinator by e-mail of the upcoming visit with specific information related to location, date, and time; and

• Invite an LEA observer to accompany the SES monitor (not required).

Page 10: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

During the Visit

•Documentation•Observation • Interview

Page 11: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Documentation Examples

•Student enrollment records including students with disabilities and limited English proficient students•Student attendance records•Student learning plans•Student materials

Page 12: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Observation Examples

•Start/stop times•Tutor interactions with students•Student engagement•Classroom management•Procedures to ensure health/safety of students

Page 13: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Interview

•Tutors•Site coordinators•Other provider representative if available

Page 14: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

After the Visit

•Monitoring report•Provider response

Page 15: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Monitoring Report

• Identifies indicator(s) rated as “not met”•Describes any required action(s)•Report emailed to the SES provider and the LEA

Page 16: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Provider Response

Providers have ten (10) business days to respond to any required action(s) as noted in the monitoring report.

Page 17: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Provider Response

•Address findings for any indicator(s) determined to be “not met”•Description of required action(s) included in the monitoring report•Documentation and/or descriptions required for required action(s)

Page 18: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Monitoring At-a-Glance

• Notify LEA 5 days prior to visit• Conduct on-site review during tutoring session– Review documents– Observe tutoring session– Interview tutors/coordinators

• Monitoring report to providers and LEA• Provider submits plan to DPI for addressing findings within 10 business days of the receipt of the report

Page 19: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Evaluating SES Provider

Page 20: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Provider Evaluation

SEA must establish procedures for withdrawing approval from SES providers that fail for 2 consecutive years to demonstrate effectiveness.

Page 21: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

SBE Policy Criteria

•Student achievement•Parental satisfaction•Student attendance

Page 22: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Student Achievement

•Assessment results•Pre and post assessment•Measure of “effect size” of all students in a provider’s program•Results submitted to SEA in January and May

Page 23: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Parental Satisfaction

•Survey•All parents of students within a providers program statewide•Disseminated, collected, and submitted by LEA

Page 24: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Student Attendance

•Hours offered vs. hours attended•All students within each provider’s program statewide

Page 25: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Weighted Criteria

•Student achievement = 50%•Parental satisfaction = 25%•Student attendance = 25%•Minimum rating of 75% to continue in Good Standing

Page 26: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Provider Status

•Good Standing = 75% or above•Probationary = less than 75%•Good Standing/Probationary With Reservations = – Compliance issues with Federal

or State requirements – 3 formal complaints

Page 27: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

With Reservation

Providers assigned any status “with reservation”–Must address the identified areas for improvement in the next SES reporting period (i.e., semester).

Page 28: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Provider Removal

•2 consecutive years of Probationary Status•Recommended removal to SBE•SBE makes final determination

Page 29: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

“Emergency” Clause

SBE may immediately remove or suspend services if it is determined there are:– Health or safety issues;– Illegal or deceptive practices;– Violation of an assurance or other

aspect of the approved plan;– Provision of falsified information; or– Violations of State or Federal law.

Page 30: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Corrective Action

A provider may be placed under “corrective action” if unresolved compliance issues are raised through NCDPI’s monitoring.

Page 31: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Corrective Action

A corrective action plan must be submitted within 30 days of the notification detailing how the provider intends to improve the deficiencies in its program.

Page 32: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Corrective Action

Removal from the state approved list if it fails to meet the requirements of its corrective action plan by the end of the SES reporting period following the provider’s placement into “corrective action.”

Page 33: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Provider Removal

Any provider removed from the State-approved list for any reason is ineligible to re-apply for the following two (2) fiscal years.

Page 34: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Provider Removal

Corrective action or termination of approval may be exercised solely with respect to the provider’s program in one or more schools or districts if issues are localized.

Page 35: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Frequently Asked Questions

Page 36: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Are there restrictions regarding who the LEA can assign as “the Director of SES?”

•No, that is a local decision.

Page 37: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Are there any restrictions on how providers may recruit classroom teachers to be SES tutors?

Yes, all local policies must be adhered to when recruiting teachers.

Page 38: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

May an LEA require criminal background checks for SES providers based on local policies?

•Yes

Page 39: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

May providers amend their program information?

•Providers may not amend their application during the current year of approval.•Providers may not add grade levels nor make other program changes.

Page 40: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

What are some examples of Parent Outreach Activities?

•Contact PIRC for ideas•Ms. Beverly [email protected]

Page 41: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

When will the 2010-11 application be posted?

•The 2010-11 application is expected to be posted in January.

Page 42: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Will current providers have to submit a new application next year?

•Current SES providers will complete a modified application to continue to be a provider in 2010-11 primarily to update current approved applications.

Page 43: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

How can I obtain a copy of the SES Standards and Procedures handbook?

•The handbook is available at

http://www.ncpublicschools.org/program-monitoring/titleIA/ses/

Page 44: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

SES Start Date

•SES Tutoring should begin by November 9, 2009.

Page 45: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Minimum Hours

•North Carolina requires providers to offer a minimum of a 30-hour program. Up to two hours of assessment may be included within the 30 hours.

Page 46: Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Hourly Rate

•Providers may not charge a higher hourly rate than the student cap can support.•Providers bill for every hour that the student attends.


Recommended