1265

London Hospital for Diseases of the Chest each receive £ 500.The ultimate residue of his estate is to be distributed

amongst the Westminster, Guy’s, and St. Mary’s Hospitals,London, the General Hospital, Tunbridge Wells, and theGlasgow Royal Infirmary. The estate is valued at .6119,508.

KING’S COLLEGE (UNIVERSITY OF LONDON).-The forty-seventh annual dinner of King’s College, London,will be held at the Hotel Cecil on Monday, May 27th. The

Bishop of St. Albans will be in the chair. -

AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION.-Mr. HerbertJ. Paterson, F’.R.C.S.Eng., is to give an address beforethe Surgical Section of the American Medical Association,which will meet at Atlantic City during the first week inJune. The subject is, "The Operation of Gastro-jejunostomyand its Physiological Effects."

CROWNHILL CONVALESCENT HOME.-The annualmeeting of the subscribers to the Crownhill ConvalescentHome, near Plymouth, was held on April 25th. The medical

report stated that during 1906 the in-patients numbered 279,compared with 317 in 1905. The financial statement wassatisfactory and showed a favourable balance of .&18.

PRESENTATION TO A MEDICAL PRACTITIONER.-At Treherbert, last week, the miners of the Fernhill. Blaen-rhondda, and Bute Collieries, presented Mr. William CathcartHinde, L.R.C.P. Lond., M.R.C.S. Eng., L.S.A., with a clock,a set of cutlery, and an address as a mark of respect andesteem.

NATIONAL SANATORIUM, BENENDEN.-PrincessChristian on April 30th formally inaugurated the completed

’’

portion of the National Sanatorium at Benenden, near

Granbrook, Kent, erected by the National Association for theEstablishment and Maintenance of Sanatoria for Workerssuffering from Tuberculosis. A description of the ceremonyand the building will be published in a future issue ofTHE LANCET.

ROYAL DEVON AND EXETER HOSPITAL.-At thequarterly meeting of the governors of the Royal Devonand Exeter Hospital, held on April 25th, it was reportedthat there was an adverse balance against the institutionof £ 1392, being C866 more than for the correspondingperiod of last year. The chairman (Sir Duckworth King)remarked that unless more support was forthcoming thecommittee would have to sell some more funded stock.

CERTIFICATES UNDER THE WORKMEN’S COM-PENSATION ACT.-At a meeting of the Newbury and DistrictMedical Society held on April 25th the following resolutionswere proposed, seconded, and carried nemine contradicenteand the honorary secretary was directed to forward a copyfor publication to THE LANCET and the British Medical

Journal, and also to every member of the society who wasnot present at the meeting.Resolution 1.-That this meeting is of opinion that the certificates

issued under the Workman’s Compensation Act by any insurancecompany, which are required to be filled in at the expense of theinjured workman and stating the probable duration of disablement,should not be signed by any member of this society.Resolution 2.-That no certificate be filled up on behalf of the

employer under the above Act for a less fee than one guinea.

Parliamentary Intelligence.NOTES ON CURRENT TOPICS.

Notification of Births Bill.THE Bill to provide for the early notification of births, which Lord

ROBERT CECIL has introduced into the House of Commons to dealwith the problem of infantile mortality, has the support of Mr.LYTTELTON, Mr. SSAOKLETON, Mr. VERNEY, Mr. GULLAND, Mr.

MASTERMAN, Mr. SHERWELL, and Mr. TENNANT. It has been printedand the text of its operative clause is as follows :-

(1) In the case of every child born after the first day of January, 1908,it shall be the duty of the father of the child, if he is actually residing inthe house where the birth takes place at the time of its occurrence, or inhis absence of any person in attendance upon the mother at the time ofthe birth or within six hours thereafter, to send or give notice of thebirth to the medical officer of the district in which the child is bornwithin 48 hours after such birth.

(2) It shall be sufficient compliance with this section if notice be sentby prepaid letter or postcard addressed to the medical officer.

(3) It shall be the duty of all rural and urban sanitary authorities to-bring the provisions of this Act to the attention of all medical practi-tioners and midwives practising in their district.

(4) Any person who fails to give or send notice of a birth inaccordance with this section shall be guilty of an offence and shall be,liable on summary conviction to a penalty not exceeding twentyshillings.

(5) The notification required to be made under this Act shall be inaddition to and not in substitution for the requirements of any Actrelating to the registration of births.

(6) This section shall apply to stillborn children as well as to childrenborn alive.

Pecblic Health Officers Bill.Three members of the House of Commons, Mr. ARTHUR BLACK,

Mr. HARMOOD-BANNER, and Mr. A. H. SCOTT, have given notice thatthey will move the rejection of the Public Health Officers Bill whenthe second reading of the measure is moved.

Opposed Bills.The second reading of the Pharmacy Bill is to be opposed by Mr.

BARKER and Mr. DUCKWORTH, whilst Mr. RADFORD has given noticethat he will move the rejection of the Sale of Whisky Bill.

The Butter and Margarine Bill.Sir EDWARD STRAOHEY, who represents the Board of Agriculture in

the House of Commons, has, as already stated in THE LANCET, movedthe second reading of the Butter and Margarine Bill, which dealswith the limit of moisture in butter and butter substitutes. Some ofthe Irish Members take exception to provisions in the Bill which willaffect the Irish butter trade. Both Mr. WILLIAM REDMOND and Mr.JOYCE have given notice of an identical motion on this point, whichwill be moved as an amendment to the motion for the second readingbefore the debate terminates. It is in the following terms: "That,whilst it is highly desirable and necessary to legislate to secure properregulations for the sale of butter, it is not expedient to interfere inany way with Irish salt firkin butter, for which there is a steadymarket and which is an important industry for large numbers offarmers in Ireland."

The Vaccination Bill.Mr. JOHN BURNS on Tuesday presented a Bill to substitute a

statutory declaration for the certificate required under Section 2 ofthe Vaccination Act, 1898, of conscientious objection. It was read afirst time.The text of Mr. BuRNS’s Vaccination Bill was issued on Wednesday.

Its clauses are as follows :-

Clause 1.-The Vaccination Act, 1898, shall be read as if the followingsection were substituted for Section 2 of that Act :-

(1) No parent or other person shall be liable to any penalty under-Section 29 or Section 31 of the Vaccination Act. 1867, if within fourmonths from the birth of the child he makes a statutory declarationthat he conscientiously believes that vaccination would be prejudicialto the health of the child and within seven days thereafter delivers thedeclaration to the vaccination officer of the district.

(2) A statutory declaration made for the purposes of this sectionshall be exempt from Stamp Duty.

(3) A statutory declaration for the purposes of this section shall bemade in the form set out in the schedule to this Act, or in a form tothe like effect.Clause 2.-Section 2 of the Vaccination Act, 1898, is hereby repealed,

but the repeal shall not effect the operation of any certificate obtainedbefore the passing of this Act.Clause 3.-(1) This Act shall come into operation on the first day oJ

January nineteen hundred and eight.(2) This Act may be cited as the Vaccination Act, 1907, and may be

cited with the Vaccination Acts, 1867 to 1898. -

The form of declaration required to be signed by the parent or personhaving the custody of a child, which is given in the schedule, setsforth that he shall "solemnly and sincerely declare that he conscienti-ously believes that vaccination would be prejudicial to the health ofthe child, and he makes this solemn declaration conscientiouslybelieving the same to be true, and bv virtue of the provisions of theStatutory Declarations Act, 1835."

HOUSE OF LORDS.

THURSDAY, APRIL 25TH.

vecrosis in Match Factories.The Earl of LYTTON called attention to the death from necrosis recently

reported from the factory of the Messrs. Moreland. He asked the noblelord representing the Home Office in the House whether, in view of thefact that phosphorus poisoning could not be prevented by the specialregulations at present in force, His Majesty’s Government wouldreconsider its attitude towards the Berne Convention prohibitingthe use of yellow phosphorus in matches. The noble earl in puttingthe question mentioned that six European States-France, Germany,Italy, Holland, Denmark, and Switzerland-had signed the BerneConvention prohibiting the manufacture, importation, or use withintheir territories of matches made with the dangerous white or yellowphosphorus. Every kind of match which the public could require

1266

.could be made without the use of this dangerous kind of phosphorus.The British Government, although it claimed to have the interests-of the industrial classes at heart, would not join the other nations intheir efforts to stamp out necrosis. However, it said that itwould only join in the Convention on condition that every nationwhich imported matches did the same. The special regulations of,the Home Office on this subject were not a sufficient protection. Sincethey came into force five cases of phosphorus poisoning had occurred inthis country.

Earl BEAUCHAMP, on behalf of the Home Office, said that in 1900,when there was a good deal of discussion upon the question ofphosphorus poisoning, the Secretary of State for the Home Depart-ment, instead of prohibiting the use of phosphorus in this country,caused special rules to be made and the memoranda which had beenlaid before Parliament showed that these rules had had very,satisfactory results. There had only been five cases of necrosis in thefive years during which these special rules had been in force Threeof these cases had been mild and the persons affected had recoveredand were able to find other employment. The other two cases were fatal.As regarded the case to which the noble earl specifically referred to,it was probable that the disease was contracted before the special,rules were made, because he was informed that necrosis lurked in thethe body for a considerable period before making its appearance.The man had worked in a match factory for 12 years and it was very yprobable that he had caught the disease, which was of an insidiouscharacter, before the new rules came into operation. It would not be ’,fair, therefore, to regard the case as being in any way due to a defect inthese rules. The Government was of opinion that the special ruleshad been successful and it proposed to adhere to the position. TheHome Secretary, however, had in contemplation amendments whichwere specially designed to meet such a case as the noble earl hadbrought to the notice of their lordships. Special arrangements wouldhave to be made in regard to dental examination and the HomeSecretary proposed to frame a rule to prohibit tobacco chewing, whichwas said by doctors to have a bad effect upon persons who worked inmatch factories.

MONDAY, APRIL 29TE.Prohibition of Medical Practice by Companies Bill.

Lord HYLTON moved the second reading of the Prohibition ofMedical Practice by Companies Bill. He said that he hoped to be ableto convince their lordships of the necessity for legislation of thecharacter proposed in the Bill. He would remind them that theMedical Acts of 1858 to 1886 provided in effect that only persons whowere legally qualified by having passed prescribed qualifying examina-tions and by being registered in the Medical Register could law-fully practise medicine, surgery, and midwifery throughout theUnited Kingdom. It had been, unfortunately, true that whatwas illegal for one man to do himself as a physician or sur-

geon, it was legal for him to do if he joined unto himselffive or six or seven other unqualified persons. It seemeda scandalous state of things that such should be possible; but unfor-tunately the General Medical Council, who were the body whose dutyit was under the Privy Council to administer these Acts, had foundthemselves unable to stop these practices, and, in fact, they werewidely spread. From a document furnished to him by the GeneralMedical Council it appeared that the incorporation of these bogusmedical and dental companies went on steadily and a good many ofthem had befn registered since the matter was last brought beforeParliament. He found that a circular had been widely distributed bya firm of company registration agents in which it was urged that un-qualified men who wanted to act as doctors and dentists should availthemselves of the incorporation of companies as a means by whichthe prohibition imposed by the Medical Acts might be entirely avoided,this prohibition being described by them as onerous. He had been fur-nished by the General Medical Council with a long list of these boguscompanies, and many of them were not included in the return to theHouse of Commons moved by Sir John Tuke. Some of these boguscompanies had done great evil and the great object of the Bill wasto protect the poorer classes of the community who were deceived bythese sham companies. If these companies could be dealt with by thelaw and could be prosecuted it would be found that they would at oncego into liquidation. The examination of the list of shareholders of thesnam companies at oomerset nouse naa reveaiea tne lace mat merewere very few shareholders indeed, and only sufficient shareholderswere taken into the companies to permit of them being formed.Their lordships might wonder why legislation had not taken place toprotect the pl1blic ...nd to prevent lives being sacrificed by these com-panies. The General Medical Council were not to blame in thismatter. They had endeavoured to induce successive Governmentsto take up this matter and to initiate legislation. In 1900Lord .Halsbury put two clauses into his Companies Bill of that yearand these would effectually have put a stop to these evils. Theseclauses were accepted by their Lordships’ House. The Bill then wentdown to the Huuse of Commons. Unfortunately for the views of theGeneral Medical Council and others who took an interest in thematter, the clauses were struck out for the reason that they were notgermane to a Companies Bill. He did not speak with any authorityon that point, but the representatives of the medical profession in theHouse of Commons without exception, such as Sir Walter Foster andSir John Tuke, and other Members, such as Mr. Bryce, begged theGovernment of the day not to take these clauses out of the CompaniesBill. However, the month was August. Both Houses of Parliamentwere, as they usually were at that season of the year, anxious to getbusiness through, and in order to prevent any opposition taking placeto the Companies ;Bill the two clauses were struck out of it and inthis condition it was passed. The general view of the medical pro-fession was that something should be done to deal with this evil ofpractice by bogus companies. Since the Act of 1900 the GeneralMedical Council had not been idle in this matter, but they had beenunable to induce any of the Governments to take it up. Now, afterH.M. Government had been approached it was suggested that a privateMember like himself should bring in this Bill.The Earl of HALSBURY supported the Bill. His lordship, who was

indistinctly heard, was understood to say that the clauses dealingwith medical companies had not been persisted in in the Bill of 1900,because with them it would have been hopeless to have attempted topass the Bill. He had received an enormous amount of literaturefrom the medical profession which showed that the law had been i,ideliberately evaded by people turning themselves into a compiny. I

This was a very facile means of evading what the legislature haddeliberately laid down with regard to the qualifications of medical men.The Earl of CREWE, who spoke on behalf of the Government, said

that the two noble lords had given the past history of this matter,which was by no means unimportant matter. He thought that whathappened in 1899 was that the noble earl began by introducing a Billdealing with this subject only, and then it was thought better toattempt to incorporate the substance of that Bill in the Companies Billof the following year.. When the two clauses in that Bill dealing withmedical companies went to the House of Commons they met with thefate that had been described. He believed as a matter of fact that itwas the friends of the noble earl himself who got them struck out. Itwas satisfactory that Lord Hylton had brought the subject before theirlordships. His Bill in the opinion of the Government met somethingwhich nearly approached a public spandal-namely, the possibility ofthe evasion by unqualified persons of the law relating to medicalpractice. It was important to point out that in one respectthe Bill contained a drastic provision. Not only did it interferewith the proceedings of unqualified people, but it also prevented theformation of a company which would employ fully qualified doctors toact for them. That was a strong decision. However, he thought that itwas possible to justify it when they remembered that the relations ofdoctor and patient were so confidential that the weight of them oughtto rest upon each doctor :individually and he ought not to be ableto shelter himself behind the name of a company. He further thoughtthat it would be generally agreed that the kind of man who would beemployed by a company would be one of the derelicts of his professionand it would be as well not to encourage the kind of practice whichwould take place if such companies were allowed to be formed. Heunderstood that Lord Hylton was quite willing that this Bill should bereferred to a Select Committee. If that course were followed theGovernment would fully concur in it. It was no doubt importantthat they should seek to avoid all hardship to individuals, and theydesired to avoid any suspicion that they were dealing hardly with thekind of practice which obtained amongst the very poor. It wasdesirable that the. matter should be thoroughly threshed out before aSelect Committee. He hoped therefore that their lordships wouldagree to the second reading and allow this course to be followed.The motion for the second reading was then agreed to.Lord HYLTON then moved that the Bill should be sent to a Select

CommitteeThis course was also agreed to.

Dentrtl Cornpanies (Restriction of Practice) Bill.Lord HYLTON then moved the second reading of the Dental Com-

panies (Restriction of Practice) Bill. He said that this Bill was almoston all fours with the preceding Bill dealing with medical practice. Hedid not know whether it was proper to deal with both subjects in oneBill or in two. The General Medical Council thought, however, thattwo Bills should be brought in There was a difference in the two Bills.This Bill did not propose to make it illegal for a company to practisedentistry provided that its members were registered dentists.The Earl of CREWE said that this Bill was complementary to the

other with the addition mentioned by the noble lord. He thought thatthis case was different from the one of the doctor. The dentist re-mained in his own torture chamber and generally did not visit thedomestic circle of his patient. This provision did not apply to thedoctor.The Bill was then read a second time and was referred to the same

Select Committee as should deal with the Prohibition of MedicalPractice by Companies Bill. -

HOUSE OF OOMMON.S.WEDNESDAY, APRIL 24TH.

The Ballina Dispensary.Mr LONSDALE asked the Chief Secretary to the Lord Lieutenant of

Ireland what action had been taken by the Local Government Board inregard to the appointment of Dr. Clarke as temporary medical officerto the local dispensary district, having regard to the fact that theBallina board of guardians made it a condition of his appointment thathe should use his influence to induce his uncle to relinquish histenancy on the Crannagh farm.-Mr. BIRRELL replied: The LocalGovernment Board has sanctioned Dr. Clarke’s appointment as

temporary medical officer of the Ballina dispensary district. No factscame to the knowledge of the Board which would justify it in with-holding its sanction.

Medicine for the Edenderry Union.Mr. LoNSDALE asked the Chief Secretary to the Lord Lieutenant of

Ireland whether he was aware that when advertising for tenders for thesupply of medicines and surgical appliances the guardians of theEdenderry Union stipulated that the envelopes should be markedon the outside from Irish firms; that out of many tenders sentin only four were marked as directed, and only those four wereopened and considered; whether this device was resorted to becausethe guardians had been warned by the Local Government Board thatrecoupment would not be made in any case where the guardians didnot accept the lowest tender received by them; and whether, havingregard to the fact that the practice of the Edenderry guardians was beingrecommended for adoption by other boards with the avowed object of boy-cotting English firms, the Local Government Board proposed taking anyaction in the matter.-Mr. BIRRELL replied: The facts are correctlystated in the first two parts of the question. The regulations providethat recoupment from the Local Taxation Account will not be allowedin any case in which the guardians accept a tender other than thelowest without the approval of the Local Government Board. TheBoard does not consider that the contracts in this case have beenentered into in accordance with the regulations and it intends,therefore, to disallow recoupment to the guardians in respect of thecost of any medicines or appliances obtained under such contracts.

Typhoid Fever in Clare Lunatic Asylum.Mr. HALPIN asked the President of the Board of Trade whether he

would inquire into the cause of delay in not returning plans of seweragefrom the Clare lunatic asylum to the inspectors of lunatics in orderthat the sanction of the Lord Lieutenant should be obtained to carryout the works, those plans having been forwarded to the Board ofTrade eight months ago; and whether he was aware that a serious

1267

epidemic of typhoid fever broke out at the asylum owing tothe alleged defective sewerage, by which several of the patientslost their lives, and that the sanction of the Board ofTrade became necessary owing to the fact that the sewers

were to be carried over a small stream subject to tidal influence thatran dry in the summer season and that the principal owner andoccupier of the adjacent lands gave his sanction to the project monthsago.-Mr. LLOYD GFORGE (in a written answer) replied: The firstcommunication in this matter from the Dublin Office of LunaticAsylums was received in August last, but it was not until October thatthe necessary plans were forwarded to the Board, who, in the samemonth, gave instructions for the application to be advertised. TheLunatic Asylums Office, however, demurred to the newspapers pre-scribed by the Board for the advertisement, with the result thatproofs of the advertisement were only received on Jan. 5th last. Onreceipt of these proofs the owners of the property adjacent to thesite of the proposed works were at once consulted by the Board ofTrade, but one of them, though written to more than once, neglectedto reply, thus causing delay. The Board of Trade has now informedthe inspectors of Lunatic Asvlums that they are prepared to consentto the works on certain conditions. I have no information as to thematter referred to in the last part of the question.

Dispensary Doctors in Ireland.Answering Mr. THOMAS O’DONNEL, who asked a series of questions

bearing on the amounts paid to dispensary doctors in Ireland, Mr.BIRRRLL wrote : The total amount of the salaries of dispensary medicalofficers in the year 1897 came to E90,727, of which one-half wasrecouped from the Parliamentary Grant. It would not be possible tostate with accuracy the actual credit given to each county in respectof the salaries of dispensary medical officers. In the year ended March,1906, the salaries of medical officers, together with the payments forservices of temporary medical officers, came to ellO,134, of which itmay be taken that somewhat less than one-half was recouped from theLocal Taxation Account. The exact amount of recoupment cannot begiven owing to the limitation imposed by section 6 (1) of the LocalGovernment Act of 1902. The salaries of medical officers a e paidaccording to unions, and the unions are not in all cases coterminouswith the counties The present number of unions extending beyondcounty limits is 46, but there were more than this number in 1897, andno sectional valuations are available for the purpose in that year, sothat a comparative statement could not be arrived at.

THURSDAY, APRIL 25TH.The Irish University Scheme.

Answering Viscount TURNOUR,Mr. BIRRELL said that he had received protests against proceeding

with the Irish University scheme upon the lines laid down by the lateChief Secretary to the Lord Lieutenant for Ireland from the Senate ofthe University of Dublin; resident members of the University ofOxford; principals and professors of the Scottish universities, of theUniversity of Sheffield, the constituent colleges of the University ofWales, and of St. David’s College, Lampeter; and from lecturers in theSchool of Medicine of the Royal Colleges, Edinburgh. So far as

English and Scottish university opinion was expressed in these protestsit was mainly confined to that part of the proposal which related to afederated university.

Pulmoraary Tuberc2closis in Belfast Mills.Mr. DEVHN asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department

whether his attention had been called to the high death rate in Beltastfrom pulmonary consumption and to the fact that the death-rate washighest among mill and factory workers,’the vast majority of whomwere females; whether there was any female factory inspector inBelfast; and, if not, whether, in view of the number of women andyoung girls employed in mills and factories in Belfast, he would con-sider the advisability of appointing a female inspector for that city andthe North of Ireland generally -Mr, GLADSTONE answered: The

figures given in the report of the Registrar-General for reland forthe year 1905 do not appear to me to show any necessary con-

nexion between the deaths in Belfast from tuberculous diseaseand employment in the linen factories. I may point out thatthe conditions obtaining in the flax and linen mills have beenmade the subject of a special inquiry by Sir Hamilton Freer-Smith andthat as a result new regulations for the industry have just been estab-lished dealing with the removal of dust, wet, &c., which should domuch to improve the health of the workers I shall be glad to sendthe honourable Member a copy. With regard to the last part of thequestion, one of the lady inspectors resides in Belfast for two-thirds ofeach year, devoting her time chiefly to inspection in the city. Othersof the lady inspectors also visit Ireland occasionally.

Lead Poisoning in Royal Dockyards.Mr. BRAMSDON asked the Secretary to the Admiralty to state how

many cases of lead poisoning had been treated bv the surgeons ofPortsmouth, Devonp rt, Chatham, Sheerness, and Pembroke dockyardsrespectively during the year 1906.-Mr. Enxuxn ROBERTSoN replied(by written answer) : The following is the number of cases of lead

poisoning treated during the year 1906:-Portsmouth, 7; Devonport, 3 ;Keyham, 2; Chatham, 2 ; Sheerness, nit ; and Pembroke, 2.Cerebro-spinal Fever and Old Clothes.

Mr. SLOAN asked the Chief Secretary to the Lord Lieutenant ofIreland whether his attention had been called to a resolution passed bythe Downpatrick rural district council against Belfast dealers dis-playing goods for sale on fair days in that town on the pretence that itwas done to avoid the spread of spotted fever ; and whether, in view ofthe iact that the Downpatrick council gave no evidence to support Iits contention and the fact that dealers from Belfast had been [injured in their business he would call upon the council to justifyits resolution or withdraw it.-Mr. BIRRFLL furnished the followingwritten reply : The Downpatrick town commissioners passed a resolu-tion requesting the Downpatrick rural district council to take steps toprevent old clothes from being brought for sale into the town. Thedistrict council thereupon inquired from the Local Government Boardwhether it had power to comply with the request and was informedin reply that the Board was not aware of any enactment giving suchpower except in the case of infected articles. I have no authority to dowhat the honourable Member suggests.

P"or-law Children.In answer to Mr. W. E. B. PRIESTLEY, Mr. JOHN BURNS wrote: On

Jan. 1st, 1907, the numbers of pauper children relieved in workhouse-infirmaries in England and Wales were as follows :-

There were also 132 children chargeable to London unions indistrict sick asylums and 797 children in the imbecile asylums belong-ing to the managers of the Metropolitan Asylum District.The number of children over three years of age chargeable to Poor lawunions in London in the workhouses on Jan. 5th last was 446 and ininfirmaries 1004. Similar information with regard to the rest of

England and Wales is not available.MONDAY, APRIL 29TH.

The Royal Commission on the Feeble-minded.In answer to Lord RoBEBT CECIL, Sir HENRY CAMPBELL-

BANNERMAN said: I am informed by the chairman of the RovalCommission on the Care and Control of the Feeble-minded that theevidence has just been closed and that the report will be presentedat the earliest possible moment, but how soon this would be it wasimpossible to say.

The Royal College of Physicians of London and the Plague.Dr. RUTIFFRFORD asked the Secretary of State for India what action

had been taken by the Government in regard to a deputation of theRoyal College of Physicians in May, 1905, to the Secretary of State forIndia pointing out the danger of the plague and recommending certainmeasures to be taken; and whether he would Jay upon the tablethe memorandum of the College of Physicians.-Mr. MORLEYfurnished the following written answer: S< me delay which I

regret has occurred in this matter. The memorandum reachedIndia at a time when the Government of India had called forand were awaiting reports by the local governments on thesubject of plague remedies, based on the personal experience oftheir officers. These reports, which were verv voluminous, weredealt with in a published resolution by the Government of Indiaof Jan. 17th, 1906, laying down in detail a complete policy for dealingwith plague. This policy in its preventive features is in practicalaccordance with the memorandum of the Royal College of Physicians,The GoverJ ment of India have since considered, in communicationwith the lopal governments, the recommendations of the memorandumfor a special medical organisation for dealing with plague. Theirscheme has not yet been definitely formulated, but I understand thatthe sanitary service will be strengthened by employing a larger numberof qualified natives of India. I shall be happy to lay the memorandumon the table if mv honourable friend will move for it.

The Vaccination Order.Mr. LuPTON asked the President of the ...ocal Government Board

whether he would state the reasons for delay in issuing the VaccinationOrder which on Feb. 14th he stated in the House was to be circulatedin a few days ; and whether he would name a day by which the Orderin question might be xpected to appear.-Mr BURNS replied tby awritten answer): Some questions of difficulty have arisen in settlingthe details of the Order which have delaved its issue. These will, Ihope, be very shortly surmounted and the Order will then be issued.

TUESDAY, APRIL 30TH.Calico and Blood Poisoning.

Mr. SUMMERBELLasked the Secretary of State for the Home Depart-ment whether he was yet in a position to report the results of hisinvestigations in regard to the death of Ann Wilson at Sunderlandthrough blood poisoning, alleged to have been set up through thedressing used by manufacturers in the making of calico -Mr. GLAD-STONE answered : I obtained a piece of the calico and had it subjectedto analysis by an expert, who after various experiments reported thatit was free from pathogenic organisms, the organisms found beingcommon contaminations of any material which is exposed to air.

Smcill-pox in Germany.Mr. LUPTON asked the President of the Local Government Board

whether, in view of the epidemic of small-pox in Germany and theprobable derivation of vaccine from variolous matter in that country,he would take steps to prohibit the importation of vaccine from thecontinent into England during such time as the epidemic may con-tinue.-Mr. JOHN BURNS said in reply: I have no information as tothere being an epidemic of small-pox in Germany, although I am awarethat th-re has been some prevalence of the disease on the frontier atMetz. I have no authority to prohibit the importation of lymph fromthe continent, and I may add that I understand that any vaccine ofvariolous origin which is current in Germany and which is liable to beimported into this country would have been frequently passed throughthe calf.

Public Health Inspection in Scotland.Mr. WATT asked the Secretary for Scotland whether he would grant

a return of the number of local authorities who had, and of t hose whohad not appointed veterinary surgeons to carry out the provisions con-tained in Sections 43 and 60 of the Public Health (Scotland) Act. 1897,and in Article 3 of the Dairies, Cowsheds, and Milkshops’ Order of 1899.- Mr. SINCLAIR replied: I am informed that ail the burghal and 97 out

1268

of a total number of 107 county anthorities have approved the employ-ment of veterinary surgeons for the purpose of Section 43 of the PublicHealth Scotland Act, 1897.

The Medical Officer to the Tokio Embassy.Sir WILLIAM COLLINS asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs

whether an appointment to the medical officership to the BritishEmbassy at Tokio was made in the early part of this year; if so,whether the vacancy was advertised; whether the gentleman appointedwas a British subject; and, if not, whether he held any medicalqualification recognised as registrable by the General Medical Council.-Sir EDWARD GREY (by written answer) replied: There was novacancy. The medical adviser to His Majesty’s Embassy proceeded onleave and made arrangements for a competent substitute to act duringhis absence.

__________________

Appointments.Successful applicants for Vacancies, Secretaries of Public Institutions, I,

and others possessiny information suitable for this column, areinvited to forward to THE LANCET Office, directed to the Sub-Editor, not later than 9 o’clock on the Thursday morning of eachweek such information for gratuitous publication.

BERTRAM-HILL, W., M.B. Manch , has been appointed House Surgeonat the Hospital for Women and Children, Leeds.

FiNzi. NEVILLE S.. M.B. Lond., M.R.C.S., L.R.C P., L.S.A., hasbeen appointed Medical Officer in Charge of the Electrical Depart-ment, Metropolitan Hospital, N.E.

FISHER, H. R., M.B. Cautab., has been appointed Certifying Surgeonunder the Factory and Workshop Act for the Fillongley District of

the county of Warwick.GRIMBLY. RICHARD HENRY, M.R C.S., L.S.A., has been appointed

Medical Officer for the Ippledon District by the Newton Abbot- (Devon) Board of Guardians.HARMER, JOHN D., M.B., Ch.B. Edin., has been appointed House

, Surgeon at the Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter.HINGSTON. CHARLES ALBERT. M.D., B.Sc. Lond., M.R.C.S, has been

re-appointed Honorary Physician to the Crownhill ConvalescentHome, near Plymouth.

HOWELL, ALFRED, M.D. Lond., has been appointed Honorary AssistantPhysician to the Cardiff Infirmary.

RELLAS, ARTHUR, M. B , Ch.B.. D.P H. Aberd , has been appointedResident Medical Officer at the Aberdeen Sick Children’s Hospital.

LEWIS, W. J., L.R.C.P. & S Edin., L F.P.S. Glasg., has been appointedCertifying Surgeon under the Factory and Workshop Act for theYstalyfera District of the counties of Brecknock and Glamorgan.

McELWAINE. THOMAS, L.R.C.S. & P. Edin, L F.P.S. Glasg., has beenappointed P lice Surgeon for the Borough of Devouport.

RUDGE, FREDERICK HENRY, L.R.C.P. Lond., M R.C.S., has beenappointed House Surgeon at the Torbay Hospital, Torquay.

SHARP, ALEXANDER D., M.D. Brux., F.R.C.S. Edin.. has been appointedConsulting Surgeon for Diseases of the Ear, Nose, and Throat atNoble’s Isle of Man Hospital.

STEWART, J., M.B., M S. Edin., has been appointed Certifying Surgeonunder the Factory and Workshop Act ior the Beith District ot thecounty of Ayr.

TAYLOR. A. E, M.B., M.S. Edin., has been appointed HonoraryPhysician to the Cardiff Infirmary.

WEBB, H. GORDON, M.R.C.S., L R.C.P. Lond., has been appointedJunior House Surgeon at the Tottenham Hospital.

Vacancies.For further information regarding each vacanc,y reference should be

made to the advertisement (see lndex).

AYRSHIRE, CUNINGHAME COMBINATION POORHOUSE.-Medieal Super-intendent. Salary B300 per annum, with house, fuel, light, &c.

BRADFORD CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL.-House Surgeon. Salary .E100.BuiDGWATEB HOSPITAL.-House Surgeon. Salary &pound;100 per annum,

with board, lodging, and laundry.BRIGHTON, bussEx COUNTY HOSPITAL.-House Physician, unmarried.

Salary R80 per annum, with board, residence, and washing.BURY ST EDMUNDS, WEST SUFFOLK GENERAL HOSPITAL.-House

Surgeon, unmarried. Salary &pound;100 per annum, with board andlodging.

CANCER HOSPITAL, Fulham-road, London, S.W.-House Surgeon.CARMARTHEN, JOINT COUNTIES LUNATIC ASYLUM.-Medical Super-

intendent. Salary E450 per annum, with house, fire, light, andwashing. Also Assistant Medical Officer. Salary .E200 per annum, Iwith board, lodging, washing, and attendance. ,

CHESTERFIELD AND NORTH DERBYSHIRE HOSPITAL AND DISPENSARY. -Junior House Surgeon. Salary &pound;80 a year, with board, apart-ments and laundress.

CITY OF LONDON HOSPITAL FOR DISEASES OF THE CHEST, VictoriaPark E. Physician to Out-patients.

COVENTRY AND WARWICKSHIRE HOSPITAL.&mdash;Junior House Surgeon for’

six months. Salary &pound;60 per annum, with rooms, board, washing,and attendance.

EVELINA HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN, Southwark Bridge-road,S.B.&mdash;House Ph‘ sician, House Surgeon, and Assistant HouseSurgeon. Salary of two former &pound;80 and of latter L70 per annum,with board, residence, and %i,ashiieg.

EXETER, ROYAL DEVON AND EXETER HOSPITAL.-Assistant HouseSurgeon, unmarried. Salary &pound;60 per annum, with board, lodging,and washing.

GLOUCESTER, GENERAL INFIRMARY AND THE GLOUCESTERSHIRE EYE_ INSTITUTE N.-Assistant Surgeon. Also Assistant Hoube Surgeon

for six months. Salary at iate of &pound;30 per annum, with buard,residence, and washing.

GUY’S HOSPITAL DENTAL SCHOOL.-Travelling Scholarship. ValueB100.

HARTSHILL, STOKE-ON-TRENT, NORTH STAFFORDSHIRE INFIRMARY ANDEYE HOSPITAL.&mdash;Rouse Physician. Salary ,cIOO per annum, withapartments. board, and washing.

HOSPITAL FOR SICK OHiiDREN, Great Ormond-street, London, W.C.-House Surgeon, unmarried, for six months. Salary &pound;20, withboard and residence.

HULL ROYAL INFIRMARY.&mdash; Casualty House Surgeon. Salary .B50, withboard and lodging.

IPSWICH, EAST SUFFOLK AND IPSWICH HOSPITAL.-Third House Sur-geon. Salary &pound;50.

LEEDS GENERAL INFIRMARY.-House Physician for six months.MACCLESFIELD GENERAL INFIRMAMY.&mdash;Junior House Surgeon. Salary

.e60 per annum, with board and residence.MAIDS TONE, WEST KKNT GENERAL HOSPITAL.-Assistant House

Surgeon and Anaesthetist, unmarried. Salary &pound;60, with board,lodging, and washing.

METROPOLITAN HOSPITAL, Kingsland-road, N.E.-Surgeon. AlsoAssistant Surgeon.

MILLER HOSPITAL, Greenwich-road, S.E. --Junior House Surgeon.Salary at rate of &pound;80 per annum, with board, attendance, andwashing.

NATIONAL DENTAL HOSPITAL AND COLLEGE. Great Portland-street, W.-Anaesthetist,

NORTHAMPTON, BERRY WOOD ASYLUM.-Junior Assistant MedicalOfficer, unmarried. Salary .E150, increasing to oE200, with board,lodging, washing, and attendance.

OLDHAM UNION.-Resident Medical Officer, unmarried. Salary &pound;120per annum, with residence, coal, gas, rations, washing, and attend-ance.

PADDINGTON GREEN CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL, London, W.-Surgeon tothe Eye Department.

ROCHDALE INFIRMRY.-House Surgeon, unmarried. Salary &pound; 100 perannum, with board, residence, and laundry.

ROYAL EAR HOSPITAL, Dean-street, Soho, W.-House Surgeon forsix months. Salary at rate of P-40 per annum.

ROYAL NAVY MEDICAL DEPARTMENT.&mdash;Examination of Candidates forEntrv.

ST. BaliraoLOMEw’s HOSPITAL. -Assistant Physician-Accoucheur,Assistant Surgeon, and Assistant Aural Surgeon.

ST. MARY’S HOSPITAL, Paddington, W.-Physician-in-Charge of Out-Patients.

SCARBOROUGH HOSPITAL AND DISPENSARY.&mdash;Junior House Surgeon.Salary ,cSO per annum, with board, residence, and laundry.

SWANSEA GENERAL AND EYE HOSPITAL.-House Surgeon. Salary &pound;75per annum.

TEIGNlVIOU’l’H HOSPITAL, South Devon.-House Surgeon. Salary &pound;70a year, with board, lodging, and washing.

WADSLEY, NEAR SHEFFIELD. WEST RIDING ASYLUM.-Fifth AssistantMedical Officer. Salary .6140, rising to &pound;160, with board, &c.

WALSALL AND DISTRICT HOSPITAL.-Junior House Surgeon. SalaryE50 per annum, with board, residence, and washing.

WANDSWORTH UNION INFIRMARY, St. John’s Hill, near ClaphamJunction.-Junior Assistant Medical Officer, unmarried. Salary atrate of &pound;100 a year, with board, lodging, and washing.

WEST BROMWICH DISTRICT HOSPITAL.-Resident Assistant HouseSurgeon, unmarried. Salary ,c50 per annum, with board, resi-dence, and washing. Also House Surgeon, unmarried. Salary &pound;100per annum, with board, residence, and washing.

WEST-END HOSPITAL FOR DISEASES OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM, &C.,73, Welbeck-street, Loudon, W.-Resident House Physician andMedical Registrar. Salary at rate of bO guineas per annum, withboard, washing, and attendance.

WEST LONDON HOSPITAL, Hammersmith-road, W.-Officer-in-Chargeof X-Ray Department.

WINCHESTER, ROYAL HANTS COUNTY HOSPITAL.-House Surgeon,unmarried. Salary ;E65, rising to ,c75, with board, residence, &c.Also Honorary Physician in Ordinary.

THE Chief Inspector of Factories, Rome Office, S.W., gives notice ofa vacancy as Certifying Surgeon under the Factory and WorkshopAct at Br.myard, in the county of Hereford.

Births, Marriages, and Deaths.BIRTHS.

FAWCETT.-On April 25th, at 66, Wimpole-street, W., the wife of JohnFawcett, M D., of a son.

GAMAN.-On April 26th, at Caistor House, Caistor, Lincolnshire, thewife of F. R. S. Gaman, M.R.C.S., L.R.C.P., ot a daughter.

VISGER -On April 3Jth, 1907, at Elm Lodge, Oleved&ugrave;ll, the wife ofCharles Visger, M.R.C.S., of a daughter.

MARRIAGE.GATHER&mdash;HEYCOCK.&mdash;On April 25th, at Great St. Marv’s Church,

Cambridge, Francis Gayner, M.A., M.R.C.S., L.R.C.P., to EmilyBertha, elder daughter of Charles T. Heycock, F.R.S., Fellow ofKing’s College, Cambridge _--_-

DEATHS.HUGHES.&mdash;On April 24th, at Bronwendon, Penmaenmawr, North Wales,

in his 82nd year, Robert Hughes, M.D.SKERRITT.&mdash;On April 29th, at Ivor House, Durdham Park, Clifton,

BrisLol, Edward Marktiana Skerritt, M.D., F.R.C.P., SemorPhysician to the Bristol General Hospital, aged 58.

WILSON.&mdash;On April 26th, at Deuham House, Goldhawk-road, London,W., Enid May, aged two years, youngest daughter of Janies Wtlson,M.D.

-

N.B.-A fee of 5s. is chargedfor the insertion of Notices of Births,Marriages, and Deaths.