+ All Categories
Home > Education > Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

Date post: 20-Oct-2014
Category:
View: 1,118 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Talk by John Couwenberg at VNN peatland meeting, Leeds 18th January 2012
Popular Tags:
37
Assessing GHG Emissions from peatlands using vegetation as a proxy John Couwenberg
Transcript
Page 1: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

Assessing GHG Emissions from peatlands

using vegetation as a proxy

John Couwenberg

Page 2: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

Peatlands contain a lot of carbon

Tollund Man, Denmark

Page 3: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

Kalimantan, Indonesia

drainage mobilises carbon: CO2 (und N2O) emissions

Page 4: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

Peenetal, Germany

rewetting to reduce emissions

Page 5: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

Quantifying GHG fluxes:

• direct flux measurements (chambers, micrometeorol.)

– combined with indicators / proxies (cf. IPCC)

• CO2 flux also assessed via stock-change approach

– standard approach for e.g. forest, mineral soil)

– not practicable for organic soils

organic soil fluxes are based on direct measurement

Page 6: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

Measuring over small areas: closed chamber method

Page 7: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

For all three GHG (CH4, CO2, N2O)

Page 8: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

Measuring over large areas: eddy covariance

Page 9: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

Mainly used for CO2, but also for CH4 and N2O

Page 10: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

Measurements need to be frequent, long term, intensive

Page 11: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

Wide variety of site parameters influencing emissions

…peatland types, peat types, spatial heterogeneity,

land use, former land use, abiotic conditions, vegetation…

Page 12: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

Measuring is complicated, time consuming, expensive

Page 13: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

Measure pilot sites, develop proxies

Meta-analysis: water level main single explanatory variable

Page 14: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

CO2 emissions from temperate European peatlands

Field measurements: WL is a good proxy

mean annual water level (cm)

t C

O2·h

a-1

·y-1

after Couwenberg et al. (2011)

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

-140 -120 -100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40

r2 = 0.68, p < 0.01

Page 15: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

-140 -120 -100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40

r2 = 0.68, p < 0.01

CO2 emissions from temperate European peatlands

Subsidence based emissions: WL is a good proxy

mean annual water level (cm)

t C

O2·h

a-1

·y-1

after Couwenberg et al. (2011): ● direct flux, ● site specific subsidence

Page 16: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

N2O emissions from temperate European peatlands

Direct flux measurements: WL is a good proxy

Couwenberg et al. (2011), bog sites, fen sites without fertilizer application, fen sites with fertilizer

application; x treed sites.

0

20

40

60

80

100

-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60

mean annual water level (cm)

kg

N2O

·ha

-1·y

-1

Page 17: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40

mean annual water level (cm)

kg

CH

4·h

a-1

·y-1

CH4 emissions from temperate European peatlands

Direct flux measurements (annual flux): WL is a good proxy

Couwenberg et al. (2011)

Page 18: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

CH4 emissions from tropical and boreal peatlands

Direct flux measurements (hourly flux): WL is a good proxy

Couwenberg et al. (2010)

Tropical; Temperate; ∆ Boreal

0

1

2

3

CH

4 e

mis

sio

n [

mg

m-2

h-1

]

-0,5

0

5

10

15

-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20

water level [cm]

-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20

wood peat SE Asia

Page 19: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

• many and frequent data necessary

• measure a lot (e.g. automatic logger)

• modeling using weather data (calibrate, monitor)

• WL not yet measurable using remote sensing

• particularly for CH4 high uncertainty remains

Proxy: Water level

Page 20: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40

mean annual water level (cm)

kg

CH

4·h

a-1

·y-1

CH4 emissions from temperate European peatlands

WL is not a quantitatively precise proxy

Couwenberg et al. (2011)

Page 21: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

-20 -18 -16 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0

mean annual water level (cm)

kg

CH

4·h

a-1

·y-1

CH4 emissions from temperate European peatlands

Direct flux measurements (annual flux): WL + vegetation

Couwenberg et al. (2011), sites with aerenchymous shunt species; sites with open vegetation without

shunt species; x treed sites.

r2 = 0.76, p < 0.01

Page 22: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

CH4 emissions from temperate European peatlands

Direct flux measurements (annual flux): vegetation

After Drösler (2005)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

aerenchymous leaves (n m-2)

kg

CH

4·h

a-1

·y-1

Page 23: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

Emissions strongly related to water level

Vegetation strongly related to water level

Emissions also related to vegetation

Use vegetation as indicator for emissions!

Page 24: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

Vegetation as indicator of emissions

• Integration of site parameters

• Quick

• Easy

• Cheap

• Reliable … ?

Greenhouse Gas Emission Site Types (GESTs)

Page 25: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

advantages

• relationship to long-term water level

• relationship to other relevant site conditions

(nutrient status, pH, land use, …)

• influences fluxes itself

(substrate quality, aerenchyma)

• can be mapped on relevant scale (1:2,500 – 1:10,000)

• can be mapped using remote sensing (good for €)

Proxy: Vegetation

Page 26: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

disadvantages

• slow reaction to changing site conditions

• must be calibrated for different climate and

phytogeographic regions

• not suitable when not there (e.g. ‘black deserts’)

Proxy: Vegetation

Page 27: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

Towards GESTs: Vegetation-forms

Integration of flora and environment

- Species groups

- Presence and absence as indicator

site factor gradient

species groups

site factor classes

subunits 1

1 2

2

3 4 5

1 2

Page 28: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

Water level class long-term median water level (cm)

wet season dry season

7+ upper sublitoral +250 to +140 +250 to +140

6+ lower eulitoral +150 to +10 +140 to +0

5+ wet (upper eulitoral) +10 to -5 +0 to -10

4+ very moist -5 to -15 -10 to -20

3+ moist -15 to -35 -20 to -45

2+ moderately moist -35 to -70 -45 to -85

2- moderately dry Water supply deficiency: < 60 l/m²

3- dry Water supply deficiency: 60–100 l/m²

4- very dry Water supply deficiency: 100–140 l/m²

5- extremely dry Water supply deficiency: > 140 l/m²

Water level classes (Wasserstufen)

Page 29: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

GESTs:

Greenhouse gas Emission Site Types

Page 30: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

Assessing rewetting

• N2O fluxes from drained peatlands very erratic

• N2O fluxes from rewetted peatlands negligible

• N2O fluxes can only decline upon rewetting

• reduction cannot be quantified

• disregard N2O: conservative estimate of reductions

Page 31: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

Ostrovskoje: GESTs

A: 2009

B: 2039 Baseline

C: 2039 Wiedervernässung

A: 7343 t CO2-eq / J

B: 7933 t CO2-eq / J

C: 3779 t CO2-eq / J

Page 32: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

Rewetting

• hydrologic analysis necessary:

which sub-area will become how wet ?

• CH4 emissions may become very high

• but unlikely higher than previous CO2 emissions

Page 33: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

Complication: methane spike after rewetting

plants not adapted to wet conditions will die off

labile carbon pool anoxic conditions methane

direct flux measurements rare or lacking

avoid: remove plants, possibly even enriched upper soil

Page 34: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

Complication: nutrient enriched soils

Large methane fluxes may persist (how long ?)

2005 2006 2007

kg CH4 ha-1 a-1 2521 4934 2376

Augustin & Chojnicki, 2008

additional problem: litter import

Page 35: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

Peatlands contain a lot of carbon

Tollund Man, Denmark

Page 36: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

peatlands are much more than just carbon…

avoid one-dimensional approach to rewetting

• biodiversity

• water retention

• nutrient retention

• local cooling

• tourism

• production (paludicultures)

Page 37: Peatland management impacts on carbon/climate regulation - international evidence

and make it wet !


Recommended