Date post: | 19-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | percival-francis |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Performance Improvement Through
Benchmarking and Performance
Measurement
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
In The Beginning
• RFP developed for operational study
• Three firms responded
• One proposed to provide a management team and save big $$
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
The DealThe Deal• Proposed a budget based on FY 1989 actual
• Provided a documented plan of cost-saving ideas
• Budget to stay at 1989 levels for 5 years, plus UM-wide increases
• We keep all savings for facilities renewal/campus improvements
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
Why Benchmark and Performance Measures?
• Business and Finance VP’s want them– They measure bookstore revenue– Endowment return
• Establishes a starting point to measure improvements
• Creates an atmosphere that fosters data-driven decision making
• Generates savings to be used for unfunded deferred maintenance projects
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
Financial Performance• Labor and Materials
• Utilities
• Environmental Services Contract
• Outside Services
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
How We Track Our Budget
• Cost per Square Foot
• Cost by Function
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
Cost by Functional Areas
• Labor
• Materials
• Outside Services
• Miscellaneous
• Labor
• Materials
• Outside Services
ZoneZone EnergyEnergy
Total TotalNot to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
Cost by Functional Areas Cost by Functional Areas (continued)(continued)
• Housekeeping-Basic
• Housekeeping-Extra
• Grounds-Basic
• Grounds-Extra
• Waste
• Recycling
• Electric
• Chilled Water
• Water
• Sewer
• Natural Gas
Environmental Services Contract
Total Total
Utilities
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
Name S.F. Labor Materials O/S Misc. Total $/S.F.
Ashe 75,800 34,757 9,988 13,480 1,505 59,730 $0.79
Physics 73,000 12,569 2,134 4,931 77 19,711 $0.27
Total Zone 148,800 47,326 12,122 18,411 1,582 79,441 $0.53
$/S.F. $0.32 $0.08 $0.12 $0.01 $0.53
Buildings
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
Utilities Performance Measures
•Electricity - Kilowatts/Square FootDollars/Square Foot
•Gas - Therms/Square FootDollars/Square Foot
•Water - Cubic Feet/Square FootDollars/Square/ Foot
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
How We Do It
• Lotus or Excel Spreadsheet
• Data entry totals only
• Sort by highest monthly increase
• Reports go to Facilities Managers for action
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
KW
H p
er S
qFt
KWH / SF(YTD May)
26.35 20.19 19.98
FY89 FY99 FY00
0.0000
0.0200
0.0400
0.0600
0.0800
0.1000
0.1200
Gas Consumption Therms / SF (May)
0.1174 0.0770 0.0703
FY99 FY00 FY01
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
Con
sum
ptio
n
Water Consumption in CCF (YTD May)
81,697 83,177 80,388
FY99 FY00 FY01
ResultsNot to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTTHROUGH
PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
Cleanup2.3%
Paperwork3.7%
Idle7.1%
Getting Parts6.7%
Trouble Shoot9.8%
Working30.1%
Talking8.2%
Travel22.2% Breaks
9.9%
Physical Plant Labor StudyMay 1995
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
Physical Plant Labor StudyMay 1995
Cleanup2 people
Paperwork3 people
Idle6 people
Getting Parts6 people
Trouble Shoot8 people
Working26 people
Talking7 people
Travel19 people Breaks
8 people
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
0
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Productive Time
Travel
22%
9.8%
3.7%
9.9%8.2%
7.1%6.7%
2.3%
Breaks T.S. Talking Idle Get Parts Paperwork Cleanup
Percentages
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
Physical Plant-1995
DIRECTOR
Assistant Director for Operations
Assistant Director Energy & Utilities
Carpentry
Painting
Plumbing
Support
Svcs
Zone
1
Zone
2
Zone
3
Electrical
H
V
A
C
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
Physical Plant-1997DIRECTOR
Academic
Maint.
Zone
1
Academic
Maint.
Zone
2
Housing
Maint.
Zone
Auxiliary
Maint.
Zone
ProjectsEnergy
and
Utilities
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
Physical Plant Labor StudyWork Breakdown (May 1997)
65%
1
Paperwork2%
Idle
1%Talking
1%
Working
Travel
18%
Breaks
4%
Trouble Shoot3%
Getting Parts6%
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
Indicators of Efficiency and Improvements
•109% improvement in productivity after reorganization in 1997, compared to 1995
•63% reduction in service response time from 18.1 days in 1995 to 3 days in 2001
•Improvement in preventive maintenance work order completion, from 43% in 1995 to 96% in 2001
•90% increase in average square feet maintained per employee, from 31,000 in 1989 to 67,000 in 2001
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
Indicators of Efficiency and Improvements
•98% customer satisfaction for fiscal year 2001; based on customer comment cards stating that service was good or great.•44% reduction in sick leave used from fiscal year 1997 to 2001; capturing 2440 hours of additional work time.
•Decrease in the academic building Facilities Condition Index (FCI) from 11.9% in 1993 to 3.1% in 2001.•38% reduction in Overtime used from fiscal year 1997 to 2001.
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN
OPEN CLOSED BACKLOG
Housing FacilitiesMonthly Work Order Count
June 2001
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
Housing Work Orders8/19/00 to 9/15/00
Pm's
5% Air Conditioning
16%
Plumbing
12%
Electrical
15%
Carpentry
27%
Trucking
25%
Painting
0%
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
Furniture Repair
31%
Tile Repair3%
Leak Repair6%
Hurricane Prep/Recovery
11%
Miscellaneous Repairs
4%
Toilet/Bathroom Repairs
6%
Door Repairs16%
Windows/Blinds Shutter Repair
23%
Housing Carpentry Work Orders8/19/00 to 9/15/00
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
Housing FacilitiesResponse Days
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
MEDIAN 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN
June 2001
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
Sign ShopBacklog Work Orders
19%
0%
0%
4%
20%
18%
0% 0%0%
0%
0%
0% 0%
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR
Under 30-Days O ver 30-Days percent> 30-Days
March 2001
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
Housing Elevator Problems(08/19/2000 to 09/15/2000)
1 1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
4
1
1
2
5
1
3
4
1
1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Nu
mb
er o
f In
cid
ents
Wals
h
Comm
ons
Pentla
nd
Eaton
Rosbo
roug
h
Pears
on
Mah
oney
McD
onald
Building
Items down shaft
Shaking/Noise
Fire Service
Other
Vandalism
Doors
Stuck
Not Working
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
OC
T
NO
V
DE
C
JA
N
FE
B
MA
R
AP
R
MA
Y
JU
N
JU
L
AU
G
SE
P
DE
C
MA
R
AP
R
MA
Y
JU
N
JU
L
AU
G
SE
P
OC
T
NO
V
DE
C
JA
N
FE
B
MA
R
A1 A2 AUX EM H1
Completed Preventive Maintenance Work Orders
Percent by Month by Zone
1997 1998
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
MA
Y
JU
N
JU
L
AU
G
SE
P
OC
T
NO
V
DE
C
JA
N
FE
B
MA
R
AP
R
MA
Y
JU
N
JU
L
AU
G
SE
P
OC
T
NO
V
DE
C
JA
N
FE
B
MA
R
AP
R
MA
Y
JU
N
A1 A2 AUX EM H1 FS
Completed Preventive Maintenance Work Orders
Percent by Month by Zone
1999 2000
June 2001
2001
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
Performance IndicatorsCustomer Comment Cards
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
Physical Plant - Sicktime ComparisonFiscal Years 98, 99, 00 and 01
5574
321733393134
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
Physical Plant - Overtime ComparisonFiscal Years 98, 99, 00 and 01
33603111
3480
5054
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
Facilities Condition Index
•Based on the NACUBO/APPA concept
•Based on annual re-assessment of University Facilities
•Shared with the Board of Trustees and Deans
•Used by FP&C as a programming tool for renovations
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.
Physical PlantPerformance Measures
Facilities Condition Index (FCI)Labor StudyWork Order Completion RatesResponse TimeBacklogPreventive Maintenance Completion PercentageWork Order Completion/EmployeeO&M Costs/Square Foot/FunctionCustomer SatisfactionOvertime CostsSick Time Usage
Not to be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the University of Miami - Facilities Administration Department.