Jet Energy Response from Z->ee+Jets 2012
Rajdeep Mohan Chatterjee
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research
INDIACMS MEETING BARC,Mumbai 3-4 August
Outline
Objective Response Estimators Event selection Samples used for MC and Data Triggers used and prescales Data MC comparison of relevant variables Response summary and comparison with other
channels Conclusion
Objective
We wish to study the Response of jets in the CMS detector.
It is important to study how closely a jet reconstructed using detector information resembles the original parton.
Both theoretical and experimental effects can lead to a mismatch between the reconstructed jet and the original hadron in terms of kinematics.
In order to study jet response we use utilize certain event topologies that involve a well measured object. Eg ү+jet,Z+jet and di-jet events.
Response Estimator(pT Balance
)
Response Estimator (MPF)
Event Selection: WP90 condition
Used GSF electrons for the analysis with pT>20 GeV (to be consistant with
the trigger) and |η|<2.4
https://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?contribId=4&sessionId=1&resId=0&materialId=slides&confId=165069
https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/CMS/VbtfEleID2011
Event Selection: Jets Used the standard PAT jets for this analysis
along with L1Fastjet, L2Relative and L3Absolute corrections.
Also studied the effect of L2L3 residuals on data
Added CHS jets Leading jet considered in 3 eta bins [0-1.3],
[1.3-2.5] and [2.5-5]
Event Selection criteria
Used the 2011 WP90 criteria for selecting good electrons
Cleaned the corrected jet collection by demanding that none of the electrons selected above layed within ΔR=0.5 of a jet.
Select non-zero jet events with the |η(leading jet)| in 3 bins[check previous slide] and |η(other jets)|<5 and leading jet p
T>10 GeV, other jets
pT>10 GeV .
The Z boson was reconstructed out of 2 electrons of opposite sign subject to 70 GeV<Z
mass(reco)<110 GeV with p
T(Z)>30 GeV.
|ΔΦ(leading jet,Z)| > 2.7
The data-MC comparison was performed with events satisfying these conditions.
Samples used for data and MCMC: /DYJetsToLL_M-50_TuneZ2Star_8TeV-madgraph-tarball/Summer12-PU_S7_START52_V9-v2/AODSIM
GlobalTag: MC_SQ_V2.db
cross-section: 2950 pb
Data:
/DoubleElectron/Run2012A-PromptReco-v1/AOD
/DoubleElectron/Run2012B-PromptReco-v1/AOD
GlobalTag: DATA_SQ_V2.db
Total integrated luminosity : 1.571 fbTotal integrated luminosity : 1.571 fb-1-1
JSON file: Cert_190456-194479_8TeV_PromptReco_Collisions12_JSON.txt
Triggers used
Tried to look for events where the following HLT had fired:
HLT_Ele17_CaloIdT_CaloIsoVL_TrkIdVL_TrkIsoVL_Ele8_CaloIdT_CaloIsoVL_TrkIdVL_TrkIsoVL versions 16 and 17
This trigger is unprescaled over 2012A,B
Primary vertex distributionBlack->data Red->Re-weighted MC
Z mass
Z pT
Alpha=pT(jet2)/p
T(Z)
Alpha(zoomed)
Response
MPF
Averages in bins of alpha and Z pT
The basic idea is to obtain the response and MPF for alpha extrapolated to 0 in bins of Z p
T
We choose alpha < 0.3
Z pT
bins ={30,60,90,120,150,400}
We have three eta bins for the leading jet [0-1.3],[1.3-2.5] and [2.5-5]
For each Z pT bin at the above value of the alpha the
mean and rms of the response and MPF were evaluated for the Data/MC ratio .
MPF/Response summary 1
MPF/Response summary 2
MPF/Response summary 3
Comparison with other channels
Conclusion
Results presented for a fixed alpha bin alpha<0.3 and different Z Pt bins
Studied effect of CHS in different bins of the eta of the leading jet. MPF with and without CHS is compatible with each other within statistical errors. A few Z Pt bins seem problematic for the consistency of the CHS and non-CHS Pt Balance values.
Differences with other channels need to be understood.
Future works
In the near future would study response for uncorrected jets as incorporate MET corrections
Other MC generators like Herwig are to be included
We should strive to be unify our event selection with the other channels.
Variation of Response with time needs to be studied
Preliminary results in AN-12-245. Needs to finalized with the updated luminosity.