Economic pressures continue for all states
• Reduced State Revenues• Corporate Tax Receipts• Personal Tax Receipts• Sales Tax Receipts• Inheritance/Estate Tax Receipts
• Reduced State Revenues• Corporate Tax Receipts• Personal Tax Receipts• Sales Tax Receipts• Inheritance/Estate Tax Receipts
• Higher Expenditures• Medicaid Costs• Homeland Security• Education• Corrections• Employee Salaries• Employee Healthcare
Costs
• Higher Expenditures• Medicaid Costs• Homeland Security• Education• Corrections• Employee Salaries• Employee Healthcare
Costs
StateBudget
States face difficult budgetary choices
• Increase Revenues
• Reduce Expenditures
• Use Reserves
Tax Revenue Decline Much Worse Than Economy Might Suggest
State Tax Rev enue Has Fallen Far More Sharply Relativ e to Ec onomyThan in 1980-82 and 1990-91 Rec es s ions
1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002
State F is cal Y ear
Sources : U .S. Bureau of Ec onom ic Analy s is , U .S. Bureau of the C ens us , Signif ic ant Features of Fis cal Federalism -1984 (AC IR ), Fis c al Survey of the States (N GA), R oc kef eller Ins t itute of Gov ernm ent
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
% C
hang
e
R eal GD P per capita, c alendar y ear in whic h f is c al y ear began R eal s tate tax rev enue per capita, adjus ted f or legis lat ion
-7.4
-2.0
-3.0-3.5
-1.8
-0.7
Tax Revenue: No Longer PlummetingBut Remains Weak
State Tax Revenue Adjusted for Legislation and InflationFour-Quarter Moving Average, Indexed to 1994
100
105
110
115
120
125
Source: Nicholas W. Jenny, Rockefeller Institute of Government, Underlying State Revenue Picture Remains Bleak, August 2003
1994
=10
0
States Borrowing Record Amounts
• $224 billion during FY 2003
• Double the amount of two years ago
• “Follow the federal leader” tactics?
• Stall tactic?
• Even this market has limits
Over 60 percent of the State’s General Fund budget goes toward education
FY2003 General Fund Expenditures
Economic Development,
Ag, Other4%
Property Tax Relief
8%Safe Communities
10%
K-12 Education46%
Higher Education
15%
Health and Family Services
17%
Source: Iowa Department of Management
• Fund balances: drawn down from more than 10% of expenditures in FY 2001 to 1.3% of expenditures at end of FY 2003; 16 states now have balances of <1%
• Special funds: At least 23 states tapped capital, highway, other funds for FY 2003, and 29 for FY 2004; at least 16 have used tobacco settlement money
• Spending cuts: 31 states cut for FY 2004 in some fashion; Medicaid cost containment planned in many states (but how real?)
• Tax increases:– FY 2003: >= 1% in 16+ states, for $6.7 billion, 40% of $ was
cigarette taxes; a few large or broad-based tax increases – KS, IN, MA, NJ, TN – but these were exceptions, not the rule
– FY 2004: more income and sales tax increases, $6.9 billion tax increase in total (see next page)
Source: Donald Boyd, Director, Rockefeller Institute of Government, SUNY
State Responses So Far
0.10
0.11
0.12
0.13
0.14
0.15
0.16
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
The Tax Burden: Rising Expectations?
(Ratio of personal taxes to personal income)
Source: Global Insight
Gimmicks and Tricks• Payment shifts
– Texas delayed $2 billion over 2 years
– Minnesota delayed $700 million
– New Jersey $300 million school aid payment delayed
– Kansas $200 million delayed $170 million advanced deadline for payment of property taxes
• Sit on bills– Illinois $1.5 billion this year ($2 billion last year)
• Asset sales and leasebacks
• Draining trusts and other funds – Florida $1.3 billion
When Will Finances Of State Governments Recover?
• Economy currently at least as weak as state government forecasters expected
• Additional near-term risks for income taxes, related to financial markets
• Will be many years before markets, and associated income, recover to 2000 and 2001 levels
• Continued erosion of states’ sales taxes• Medicaid and K-12 education spending pressures• Many states solved 2003-04 problems in ways that make
2004-05 and 2005-06 much worse
Good times for most states probably at least 2-3 years away
Moody’s Outlook for StatesContinues to be Negative
• 16 states currently on negative outlook.
• More negative outlooks and rating actions likely.
• Oregon downgrade in March was 8th for states since last state upgrade in 2/01 (Connecticut).
• 4 states now on Watchlist for downgrade (Conn., Minn., Mich., Ill.)
All States:Structural Balance Will Be Elusive
• Spending is on a higher growth plane and is outstripping revenue growth.
• Budget problems will persist into FY05:– FY04 have large budget gaps due to
substantial use on non-recurring resources to balance FY03.
• Pace of economic recovery will be key, but modest recovery
forecasts will leave a difficult FY04 and FY05.• Higher rated credits will restore structural balance and
rebuild reserve funds quickly.• Further credit deterioration among states is likely. • Problems beginning to be pushed down to local governments.