+ All Categories
Home > Documents > UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e

UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e

Date post: 05-Jul-2018
Category:
Upload: artna-btari
View: 223 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 18

Transcript
  • 8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e

    1/18

    9A

    M R  K

    Warning

    The   Library Depar tment has an electr onic collection of laws and regulatio ns, which hav e

    either   been  d ownloade d f rom the websi tes of government , Non-gove rnment or private

    commpanies   or   sel f -scanned  from various publications. It should be noted   that these

    materials  are only intended for internal use within the  Firm.  A l l lawyers, paralegals,  interns,

    secretaries  and support staff should only be using these materials in the appropriate manner.

    It is strongly  advised  not to  send  any sof tcopies and/or hardcopies di rectly to  third  parties

    bearing  in mind the potential risk of Violation of the provisions of the prevailing Copyright Law.

    (Law  No. 15/ 2001 dated Augu st 1,2001)

    BY THE GRACE OF GOD ALMIGHTY

    THE  PRESI DENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA,

    Considering:

    a.  that in the global trade era, in line  with  the ratificationof international conventions by Indonesia, the role of

    marks  becomes very important, particularly in main

    taining the sound business competition;

    b. that in relation thereto, marks need adequate regula

    tion to provide better service for the public;

    c. that based on the considerations in letters a and b as

    well  as observing experience from the implementation

    of the existing mark taw, it is deemed necessary to

    replace Law No. 19/ 1992 on mark as already amended

    by Law No. 14/ 1997 concerning the amendment to Law

    No.  19/ 1992 on mark;

    In  view  of:

    1. Article 5 paragraph (1), Article 20 and Article 33 of the

    Constitution of 1945;

    2. Law No. 7/1994 on the ratification of the Agreement

    Establishing the World Trade Organization (Statute Book

    of 1994 No. 57, Supplement to Statute Book No. 3564);

    With  the approval of

    THE  HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF

    THE  REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA

    D E C I D E S :

    To stipulate :

    LAW ON MARK

    CHAPTER I

    GENERAL  PROVISION

    Article 1

    Referred to in this law as:

    1. . lark is a sign in the form of picture, name, word, let

    ters, figures, configuration of colors or combination of

    the said elements  which  has distinguishabiiity and is

    used in trading activities of goods and services.

    2. Trade mark is a mark used in goods traded by some

    body or several persons collectively or statutory bodies for distinguishing the goods from other goods of

    the same kind.

    3. Service mark is a mark used in services traded by some

    body or several persons collectively or statutory bo

    dies for distinguishing the services from other goods of

    the same kind.

    4. Collective mark is a mark used in goods and/ or ser

    vices of the same characteristics  which  are traded by

    somebody or several persons collectively or statutory

    bodies for distinguishing the goods and/or services from

    other goods/services of the same kind.

    5. Application is a request for the registration of mark

    submitted in  writing  to the Directorate General,

    6. Applicant is a party submitting an application.

    7. Auditor is a mark examiner, namely an official  appointed

    by a ministerial decree, and tasked to examine appli

    cations for the registration of marks because of his/ her

    expertise.

    8. Proxy is a consultant of intellectual property rights.

    9. Minister is the minister overseeing a department  with  a

    scope of tasks and responsibility covering intellectual

    property rights, including mark.

    10. Directorate General is the Directorate General of

    Intellectual Property Rights subordinate to the depart

    ment led by the minister,

    11. Date of receipt is the date of receipt of an application

    already  fulfilling  administrative requirements.

    12. Consultant of Intellectual Property Rights is somebody

    having expertise in the  field  of intellectual propertyrights and specially providing services in the  field  of

    submission and settlement of applications for patents,

    marks,  industrial designs as  well  as other fields of

    intellectual property rights and being registered as a

    consultant of intellectual property rights at the Direc

    torate General.

    13. License is a permit granted by a holder of a registered

    mark to other parties through an agreement based on

    the granting of rights (not the transfer of rights) to use

    the mark   wholly  and partly for goods and/ or services

    which  are registered in a specified period and under

    certain conditions.

    14. Priority right is a right of an applicant to submit an

    application originating in countries  which  join the Paris

    Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property or

    the Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organiza

    tion to secure recognition that the date of receipt in

    countries of origin constitutes the priority date in the

    destination country  which  is also a member country of

    the two agreements, as long as the submission is done

    in the period already determined on the basis of the

    Paris Convection for the Protection of Industrial Pro

    perty,

    15. Day is working day.

    CHAPTER II

    SCOPE  OF MARK

    Part One

    General

    Article 2

    The mark as stipulated in this law covers trade

    and service marks.

    Article 3

    Right to Mark is an exclusive right granted by the

    country to the owner of a mark registered at the Mark

    General List for a specified period to use the mark directly

    or  to permit other parties to use the mark.

    Business News 6661-6662/12-9- 2001Part Two

  • 8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e

    2/18

    10A

    Part Two

    Unregi5teredable and  rejected mark

    Article  4

    A mark cannot  be  registered  on the  basis  of an

    application submitted  by an  applicant  with  the bad inten

    tion.

    Article  5

    A mark cannot  be  registered  if it  contains  any ofthe  following  elements:

    a.  contravening  laws  in force, religious morality, decency

    or  public order;

    b.  not  having distinguishability

    c. already becoming public property; or

    d.  being information  on or  being connected  with  goods

    and/ or services whose registration  is applied  for.

    Article  6

    (1) The Directorate General must reject  any application,  if

    the mark:

    a.  being  the same principally  or  totally  as a  mark   of

    other parties,  which  has been registered first,  in thecase  of   goods and/ or services of the same kind;

    b. being  the  same principally  or  totally  as a  mark

    already popularly belonging  to  other parties,  in the

    case  of  goods and/ or services of the  same kind;

    c. being  the same principally  or totally  as a geographi

    cal indication already known.

    (2) The provision  as meant  in  paragraph  (10  letter  b  also

    can  be applied  to goods and/ or services  of  other kinds

    as long  as  they  fulfill  certain requirements  which  will

    be further stipulated  by a  government regulation.

    (3) The Directorate General also must reject  any applica

    tion  if the mark:

    a.  being  or  having resemblance  to  names  of   popularfigures, photos  or  names of   statutory bodies owned

    by other parties, unless otherwise based on the writ

    ten approval  of the  rightful party;

    b. being imitation  or  having resemblance  to  names or

    acronyms  of   names, flags, signs  or  symbols  or

    emblems  of   countries  or  national  and  international

    institutions, unless otherwise based on the  written

    approval of the authorized party;

    c. being imitation  or  having resemblance  to  signs  or

    seals  or official  stamps used  by countries  or govern

    ment  institutions, unless otherwise based  on the

    written  approval  of the authorized party.

    CHAPTER  III

    APPLICATION  FOR  REGISTRATION  OF  MARK

    Part One

    Requirements  and Procedures  for  Application

    Article  7

    (1) Every application  is submitted  in writing in the  Indone

    sian language  to the  Directorate General  by  mention

    ing:

    a.  month, date, year;

    b.  full  name, citizenship  and address of the  applicant;

    c.  full  name,  and  address  of   proxy,  in the case  of the

    application being submitted through  a  proxy;

    d.  colors,  if the mark whose registration  is  applied  for

    uses color elements;

    e. name  of   country  and date  of the  first request  for

    mark,  in the case of the  mark being submitted  with

    a priority right.

    (2) Every application must  be  signed  by the applicant  or

    his/her proxy.

    (3) The applicant  as meant  in paragraph (2) can consist of

    one person  or  several persons collectively,  or a  statu

    tory body.

    (4) The application  is  accompanied  by  payment receipt  of

    costs.

    (5) If an application  is submitted  by more than  one person

    collectively that have right to the  said mark,  all names

    of   the applicants  are mentioned  by choosing  one of the

    addresses  as their address.

    (6) If the  application  as meant  in  paragraph  (5) , the  said

    application  is  signed  by one of the applicants entitled

    to  the  mark   by  attaching  the  written  approval  of the

    representing applicants.

    (7) In the  case  of the  application  as meant  in  paragraph

    (5) being submitted through their proxy,  the power  of

    attorney  is  signed  by all  parties entitled  to the  said

    mark.

    (8) The proxy  as meant  in paragraph  (7) is a  consultant of

    inte'hctual property rights.

    (9) Provisions  on  requirements  for the  appointment  of a

    consultant  of   intellectual property rights  are  regulated

    by  a  government regulation,  while  procedures  for the

    appointment of the consultant  are regulated  by a presi

    dential decree.

    Article  8

    (1) Applications  for 2 (two) classes  of   goods  or more and/

    or  services can be  submitted  in one application.

    (2) The application  as meant  in  paragraph  (1) must  men

    tion kinds of  goods and/ or services subsumed  in classes

    whose registration  is applied for.

    (3) Classes of the goods and/ or services as meant  in para

    graph  (1) are further regulated  by a  government regu

    lation.

    Article  9

    Provisions on requirements and procedures for the

    application  are further stipulated  by a  government regulation.

    Article  10

    (1) Every application submitted by applicants living or domi

    ciled permanently outside  the territory  of the  Republic

    of Indonesia must  be  submitted through their proxies

    in Indonesia.

    (2) The applicants  as meant  in paragraph  (1) must declare

    and chose domiciles  of   proxies  as their legal domiciles

    in Indonesia.

    Business News 6661-6662/ 12-9-2001 Part Two

  • 8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e

    3/18

    11A

    Part Two

    Application for Registration of Mark   with  Priority Right

    Article 11

    Every  application using a priority right must be

    submitted not later than 6 (six) months, starting from the

    date of receipt of application for the registration of mark

    received for the first time in other country,  which  constitutes a member country of the Paris Convention for the

    Protection of Industrial Property or the Agreement Estab

    lishing the World Trade Organization.

    Article 12

    (1) Besides  fulfilling  the obligations as meant in Part One

    of this Chapter, every application using a priority right

    must be accompanied by evidence of receipt of appli

    cation for the first time,  which  results in the priority

    right.

    (2) The evidence of the priority right as meant in para

    graph (1) is translated into the Indonesian language.

    (3) In the case of the provisions as meant in paragraphs

    (1) and (3) being not  fulfilled  in a period not later than

    3 (three) months after the expiration of a right to sub

    mit application by using the priority right as meant in

    Article 11, the application continues to be processed,

    but it uses no priority right.

    Part Three

    Examination of Completeness of Application for

    Registration of Mark

    Article 13

    (1) The Directorate General examines the completeness of

    the requirements for registration of mark as meant in

    Articles 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12.

    (2) In the case of shortcomings being found in the  com

    pleteness of the requirements as meant in paragraph

    (1),  the Directorate Genera! asks for completing the

    requirements not later than 2 (two) months as from

    the date of dispatch of the request for completing the

    requirements.

    (3) In the case of the shortcomings dealing with the require

    ments as meant in Article 12, the deadline of comple

    tion of the requirements is 3 (three) months at the

    maximum,  starting from the date of expiration of the

    period of submission of application using a priority right.

    Article 14

    (1) In the case of the requirements being not completed inthe period as meant in Article 13 paragraph (2), the

    Directorate General notifies the applicant or his/ her

    proxy in  writing  that the application is considered ha

    ving withdrawn.

    (2) Should the application be considered having withdrawn

    as meant in paragraph (1), all costs already paid to the

    Directorate General cannot be taken off.

    Part Four

    Time of receipt of application for registration of mark

    Article 15

    (1) In the case of the whole administrative requirements

    as meant in Articles 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 being

    already fulfilled, the application is given the date of

    receipt.

    (2)The date of receipt as meant in paragraph (1) is

    recorded by the Directorate General.

    Part Five

    Change  in and withdrawal of application forregistration of mark

    Article 16

    Every  application is only allowed co change in name

    and/ or address of the applicant or his/her proxy.

    Article 17

    (1) As long as a decision does net yet obtain from the

    Directorate General, applicants or their proxies can with

    draw their applications.

    (2) In the case of the withdrawal as meant in paragraph

    (1) being done by a proxy, it must be done on the basis

    of special power of attorney for the need of the with

    drawal.

    (3) In the case of an application being withdrawn, all costs

    already paid to the Directorate General cannot be taken

    off.

    CHAPTER IV

    REGI STRATION OF MARK

    Part One

    Substantive Examination

    Article 18

    (1) Not later than 30 ( thirty) days as from the date of

    receipt as meant in Article 15, the Directorate General

    examines the application substantively.

    (2) The substantive examination as meant in paragraph (1)

    is done on the basis of the provisions as meant in

    Articles 4, S and 6.

    (3) The substantive examination as meant in paragraph (1)

    is completed not later than 9 (nine) months.

    Article 19

    (1) The substantive examination is executed by an auditor

    at the Directorate General.

    (2) Th e auditor is an  official  who is appointed as and

    relieved of a functional  official  by the Minister on the

    basis of certain requirements and qualifications because

    of his/her expertise.

    (3) The auditor is given a functional career path andallowance, besides other rights in accordance with  laws

    in force.

    Article 20

    (1) In the case of an auditor report ing results of the

    substantive examination that an application can be

    approved for registration, based on the approval of the

    Director General, the application is announced in Mark

    Gazette.

    (2) In the case of an auditor reporting results of the

    substantive examination that an application cannot be

    registered or is rejected, based on the approval of the

    Business News 6661-6662/ 12-9-2001 Director

  • 8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e

    4/18

    12A

    Director General, the rejection is notified in  writing  to

    the relevant applicant or his/ her proxy by mentioning

    reasons for the rejection.

    (3) Not later 30 (thirty) days as from the date of receipt of

    the application as meant in paragraph (2), the appli

    cant or his/ her proxy can raise objection or response

    by mentioning reasons.

    (4) In the case of the applicant or his/ her proxy not raising

    the objection or response as meant in paragraph (3),

    the Directorate General stipulates a decision on the

    rejection of the said application.

    (5) In the case of the applicant or his/ her proxy raising the

    objection or response as meant in paragraph (3), and

    the auditor reporting that the said response is accept

    able,  based on the approval of the Dir ecto rate

    General,  the application is announced in Mark Gazette.

    (6) In the case of the applicant or his/ her proxy raising the

    objection or response as meant in paragraph (3), and

    the auditor reporting that the said response is un

    acceptable, based on the approval of the Directorate

    General,  a decision on the rejection of the said appli

    cation is stipulated.

    (7) The decision on rejection as meant in paragraphs (4)

    and (6) is notified in  writing  to the relevant applicant

    or  his/ her proxy by mentioning its reasons.

    (8) In the case of an application being rejected, all costs

    already paid to the Directorate General cannot be with

    drawn.

    Part Two

    Announcement of Application

    Article 21

    Not later than 10 (ten) days as from the date of

    approval of an application for registration, the Directorate

    General announces the application in Mark Gazette.

    Article 22

    (1) The announcement lasts for 3 (three) months and is

    executed by:

    a.  placing it in Mark Gazette issued periodically by the

    Directorate General; and/ or

    b. placing it in special means easy and clear for public

    view which  is provided by the Directorate General.

    (2) The Directorate General records the date of commence

    ment of announcement of an application in Mark

    Gazette.

    Article 23

    The announcement is done by mentioning:

    a.  full  name and address of the applicant, including proxy

    in the case of the application being submitted through

    a proxy;

    b. class and kind of goods and/ or services whose mark is

    requested for registration;

    c. date of receipt;

    d.  name of the country and date of receipt of an applica

    tion for the first time, in the case of the application

    being submitted by using a priority right; and

    e. specimen of mark, including information on color and

    in the case of etiquette of mark using foreign language

    and/ or letters other than Latin letters and/ or figures

    not common in the Indonesian language, along  with  its

    translation into the Indonesian language, Latin letters

    or  figures common in the Indonesian language, as  well

    as its pronunciation in Latin spelling.

    Part Three

    Objection and Rebuttal

    Article 24

    (1) During the announcement period as meant in Article

    22,  every party can raise objection in  writing  for the

    said application to the Directorate General  with  a cost

    being charged.

    (2) The obj ection as meant in paragraph (1) can be sub

    mitted if there is sufficient reasons and proof that the

    mark   whose registration is applied for is an

    unregisteredable and rejected mark on the basis of laws.

    (3) In the case of the objection as meant in paragraph (1)

    being existent, the Directorate General sends a copy ofletter containing the objection to the relevant appli

    cant or his/ her proxy not later than 14 (fourteen) days

    as from the date of receipt of the objection.

    Article 25

    (1) The applicant or his/ her proxy is entitled to deliver a

    rebuttal of the objection as meant in Article 24 to the

    Directorate General.

    (2) The rebuttal as meant in paragraph (1) is submitted in

    writing  not later than 2 (two) months as from the date

    of receipt of the copy of objection conveyed by the

    Directorate General.

    Part Four

    Reexamination

    Article 26

    (1) In the case of any obj ection and/ or rebuttal , the

    Directorate General uses the objection and/ or rebuttal

    as consideration material in the reexamination of the

    application already announced as meant in Article 21.

    (2) The reexamination of the application as meant in para

    graph (1) is completed not later than 2 (two) months

    as from the date of expiration of the announcement

    period.

    (3) The Directorate General notifies in  writing  the result of

    the reexamination as meat in paragraphs (1) and (2)

    to the party raising the objection.

    (4) In the case of the auditor reporting results of the

    reexamination that the objection is acceptable, the

    Directorate General notifies the applicant in writing  that

    the application cannot be registered or is rejected, and

    in such case, the applicant or his/ her proxy can

    appeal.

    (5) In the case of the auditor reporting results of the

    reexamination that the objection is unacceptable, based

    on the approval of the Director General, the applica

    tion is declared approved for registration in Mark

    Gazette.

    Business News 6661-6662/12-9- 2001 Article 27

  • 8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e

    5/18

    13A

    Article 27

    (1) In the case of the objection as meant in Article 24 being

    not existent, the Directorate General issues and grants

    a mark certificate to the applicant or his/her proxy not

    later than 30 (thirty) days as from the date of expira

    tion of the announcement period.

    (2) In the case of the objection as meant in Article 26 para

    graph (5) being unacceptable, the Directorate Genera!

    issues and grants a mark certificate to the applicant or

    his/ her proxy not later than 30 (thirty) days as from

    the date of approval of the application for registration

    in Mark Gazette.

    (3) The mark certificate as meant in paragraph (1) contains:

    a.  full  name and address of the owner of the regis

    tered mark;

    b.  full  name and address of the proxy, in the case of

    the application being submitted on the basis of the

    provision in Article 10;

    c. date of submission and date of receipt;

    d.  name of the country and date of receipt of the appli

    cation for the first time, in the case of the applica

    tion being submitted by using a priority right;

    e. etiquette of the registered mark, including informa

    tion on kinds of colors, in the case of the said mark

    using mark elements and in the mark using foreign

    language and/ or letters other than Latin letters and/

    or  figures not common in the Indonesian language,

    along  with  its trans lation into the I ndonesian

    language, Latin letters or figures common in the

    Indonesian language, as  well  as its pronunciation in

    Latin spelling;

    f. number and date of registration;

    g.  the validity period of registration of mark.

    (4) Every party can submit an application for obtainingofficial  texts of certificates of marks registered in Mark

    Gazette by paying a cost.

    Part Five

    Protection Period of Registered Mark

    Article 28

    Every  registered mark secures legal protection for

    a period of 10 (ten) years as from the date of receipt and

    the protection period is extendible.

    Part Six

    Application for Appeal

    Article 29

    (1) An application for appeal can be  filed  against the

    rejection of an application connected  with  reasons and

    consideration bases on the substantive matters as

    meant in Articles 4, 5 and 6.

    (2) The application for appeal is submitted in  writing  by

    the relevant applicant or his/her proxy to the Mark

    Appeal Commission  with  a copy made available to the

    Directorate General by paying a cost.

    (3}The application for appeal is submitted by explaining

    the objection completely as  well  as reasons for the

    rejection of the application as a result of the substan

    tive examination.

    (4) The reasons as meant in paragraph (3} must not be

    correction or improvement of the rejectee application.

    Article 30

    (1) Every application for appeal is submitted not later thar.

    3 (three) months as from the date of notification of

    rejection of the application.

    (2) In the case of the period as meant in paragraph (1)

    already elapsing without the application for appeal, the

    application is considered accepting the rejection of the

    application.

    (3) In the case of the application being already considered

    acceptable as meant in paragraph (2), the Directorate

    Genera!  records and announces the rejec: :on.

    Article 31

    (1) The Mark Appeal Commission makes a decision not later

    than 3 (three) months as from the date of receipt of ar

    app'ication for appeal.

    (2) In the case of the Mark Appeal Commission ruling in

    favor of the application for appeal, the Directorate

    General executes the announcement as meant in

    Article 21, except the application already announced in

    Mark Gazette.

    (3) In the case of the Mark Appeal Commission rejecting

    the application for appeal, the applicant or his/ her proxy

    can  file  a lawsuit against the decision on the rejection

    of the application for appeal to the Court  of   Commerce

    not later than 3 (three) months as from the date of

    receipt of the decision on the rej ection.

    (4) Only appeal for the Supreme Court can be  filed  against

    the decision of the Court of Commerce as meant in

    paragraph (3).

    Article 32

    Procedures for the application, examination and

    settlement of appeal are further stipulated by a presiden

    tial  decree.

    Part Seven

    Mark Appeal Commission

    Article 33

    (1) The Mark Appeal Commission is a special agency  which

    is independent and belongs to the department in charge

    of intellectual property rights.

    (2) The Mark Appeal Commission consists of a chairman

    concurrently member, vice chairman concurrently  member  and members composed of several experts in

    needed fields, as  well  as senior auditors.

    (3) The members of the Mark Appeal Commission as meant

    in paragraph (I) are appointed and relieved by the Min

    ister for the tenure of 3 (three) years.

    (4) The chairman and vice chairman are elected from and

    by members of the Mark Appeal Commission.

    (5) In order to examine an application for appeal, the Mark

    Appeal Commission establishes a council  with  the  num

    ber  of members being odd, at least 3 (three) persons,

    and out of them, one is senior auditor not examining

    the application substantively.

    Business News 6651-6662/ 12-9-2001 Article 34

  • 8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e

    6/18

    14A

    Article 34

    The organizational structure, tasks and functions

    of the Appeal Mark Commission are further stipulated by a

    government regulation.

    Part Eight

    Extension of Protection Period of Registered Mark

    Article 35( 1) Every owner of mark can submit an application for the

    extension for the same period any time.

    (2) The application for the extension as meant in para

    graph (1) is submitted in  writing  by the owner of mark

    or his/ her proxy not later than 12 (twelve) months

    before the expiration of the protection period of the

    registered mark.

    (3) The application for the extension as meant in para

    graph (2) is submitted to the Directorate General.

    Article 36

    An application for the extension is approved if:

    the relevant mark is  still  used in the goods or servicesas meant in the said certificate of mark; and

    b. the goods or services as meant in letter a are  still  pro

    duced and traded.

    Article 37

    (1) The Directorate General rejects an application for the

    extension if the said application fails to comply  with

    the provisions as meant in Articles 35 and 36.

    (2) The Directorate General rejects an application for the

    extension, if the said mark has resemblance principally

    or totally to a popular mark belonging to other parties,

    by observing the provisions as meant in Article 6 para

    graph (1) letter b and paragraph (2).(3) The rejection of application for the extension is noti

    fied in writing  to the owner of the mark or his/her proxy

    by mentioning reasons for the rejection,

    (4) A rebuttal of rejection of application for the extension

    as meant in paragraphs (1) and (2) can be  filed  to the

    Court of Commerce.

    '5)Only appeal for the Supreme Court can be  filed  against

    the decision of the Court of Commerce as meant in

    paragraph (3).

    Article 38

    (1) The extension of the protection period of a registered

    mark is recorded in the Mark General List and announcedin Mark Gazette.

    (2) The extension of the protection period of a registered

    mark is notified in  writing  to the owner of the mark or

    his/her proxy.

    Part Nine

    Change in Name and/or Address of

    Owner of A Registered Mark

    Article 39

    (1) Every application for recording the change in name and/

    or address of owner of a registered mark is submitted

    Business News 6661-6662/12-9- 2001

    to the Directorate General by paying a cost of record

    ing in the Mark General List and accompanied a legiti

    mate copy of evidence of the change.

    (2) The change in name and/ or address of the owner of a

    registered mark already recorded by the Directorate

    General is announced in Mark Gazette.

    CHAPTER VTHE  TRANSFER OF RIGHT TO REG ISTE RED MARK

    Part One

    The transfer of right

    Article 40

    (1) The right to a registered mark can shift or be trans

    ferred due to:

    a.  inheritance;

    b. t .-stament;

    c. grant;

    d.  agreement; or

    e. other causes justified by laws.

    (2) The transfer of right to the mark as meant in para

    graph (1) must have its recording requested to theDirectorate General for being recorded in the Mark

    General List.

    (3) The application for the transfer of right to the mark as

    meant in paragraph (1) is accompanied by supporting

    documents.

    (4) The transfer of right to the mark already recorded as

    meant in paragraph (2) is announced in Mark Gazette.

    (5) The transfer of right to a registered mark   which  is not

    recorded in the Mark General List brings about no legal

    consequence to the third party.

    (6) The recording of transfer of right to the mark as meant

    in paragraph (1) is subjected to the cost as stipulated

    in this law.

    Article 41

    (1) The transfer of r ight to a registered mark can be

    accompanied by the transfer of good name, reputation

    or others connected  with  the mark.

    (2) The right to a registered service mark inseparable from

    the personal capability, quality and  skill  of the provider

    of the relevant service can be transferred  with  the pro

    vision that the guarantee for the quality of service pro

    vided must be existent.

    Article 42

    The Directorate General only can records the trans

    fer of right to a registered mark if it is accompanied by a

    written  statement of the recipient of the transfer that the

    mark   will  be used for the trade of goods and/ or services.

    Part Two

    License

    Article 43

    ( l) The owner of a registered mark has a right to give a

    license to other parties by an agreement that the

    licensee  will  use the mark for goods or services  wholly

    or partly.

    f2^ The

  • 8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e

    7/18

    15A

    (2) The licensing agreement is effective throughout the

    territory of the Republic of Indonesia, unless other

    wise  agreed, for a period not longer than the protec

    tion period of the relevant registered mark.

    (3) The licensing agreement must have its recording

    requested to the Directorate General by paying a cost

    and legal consequences of the recording of the licens

    ing agreement apply to the relevant parties and thethird party.

    (4) The Directorate General records the licensing agree

    ment as meant in paragraph (3) in the Mark General

    List and announces its Mark Gazette.

    Article 44

    The owner of a registered mark already granting

    a license to the other party as meant in Article 43 para

    graph (1) can continue to exercise directly or give a

    license to the other third party to use the right, unless

    otherwise agreed.

    Article 45

    The statement that the licensee can further give a

    license to the third party can be stipulated.

    Article 46

    The use of the registered mark in Indonesia by

    the licensee is considered the same as the use of the mark

    in Indonesia by the owner of the mark.

    Article 47

    (1) A licensing agreement is prohibited from containing

    provisions directly and indirectly capable of causing

    harmful effects to the Indonesian economy or contain

    ing limitations discouraging the capability of I ndonesian people in mastering and developing technology in

    general.

    (2) The Directorate General must reject every application

    for the recording of licensing agreements containing

    the prohibitions as meant in paragraph (1) .

    (3) The Directorate General notifies in  writing  the rejec

    tion along  with  its reasons as meant in paragraph (2)

    to the owner of mark or his/ her proxy, and the

    licensee.

    Article 48

    (1) In the case of a licensee having good intention, but the

    mark is later revoked on the basis of the principal ortotal resemblance to other registered marks, the

    licensee continues to have a right to implement the

    licensing agreement up to the expiration of the period

    of the licensing agreement.

    (2) The licensee as meant in paragraph (1) is no longer

    obliged to continue the payment of royalty to the

    revoked licenser, but the licensee must pay royalty to

    the owner of the mark   which  is not nullified.

    (3) In the case of a licenser already receiving royalty in a

    lump sump from a licensee previously, the said licenser

    must give up the portion of royalty received to the owner

    Business News 6661-6662/12-9-2001

    of mark   which  is not nullified,  with  the amount being

    equal to the remaining period of the licensing agree

    ment.

    Article 49

    Requirements and procedures for the application

    for recording a licensing agreement and provisions on the

    licensing agreement as meant in this law are further stipu

    lated by a presidential decree.

    CHAPTER VI

    COLLECTIVE  MARK

    Article 50

    (1) Every application for the registration of trade or ser

    vice marks as a collective mark can be accepted if the

    application clearly certifies that the marks  will  be used

    a collective mark.

    (2) Besides the affirmation on the use of collective mark

    as meant in paragraph (1), the application must be

    accompanied by copies of provisions on the use of the

    marks  as a collective mark,  which  are signed by all

    owners of the relevant marks.

    (3) The provisions on the use of the collective mark as

    meant  in paragraph (1) at least contain:

    a.  nature, general characteristics or quality of goods

    or  services produced and traded;

    b. regulation for owner s of the col lective mark to

    supervise effectively the use of the mark; and

    c. sanction against the violation of regulation on the

    use of the collective mark.

    (4) The provisions as meant in paragraph (3) are recorded

    in the Mark General List and announced in Mark

    Gazette.

    Article 51

    Every  application for the registration of a collec

    tive mark is subjected to the examination of completeness

    of the requirements as meant in Articles 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

    and 50.

    Article 52

    The substantive examination of an application for

    a collective mark is done in accordance  with  the provi

    sions in Articles 18, 19 and 20.

    Article 53

    (1) Any change in the provision on the use of a collective

    mark must have its recording requested to the Direc

    torate General by accompanying a legitimate copy of

    evidence of the change.

    (2) The change as meant in paragraph (1) is recorded in

    the Mark General List and announced in Mark Gazette.

    (3) The change in the provision on the use of a collective

    mark is effective for the third party after being recorded

    in the Mark General List.

    Article 54

    ( l) The right to a collective mark only can be transferred

    to a

  • 8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e

    8/18

  • 8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e

    9/18

    17A

    b. the mark is used for goods and/ or services not suit

    able to goods and/ or services whose registration is

    applied for, including the use of a mark not suitable

    to the registered mark.

    (3) The reasons as meant in paragraph (2) letter a are due

    to:

    a.  import prohibition;

    b. prohibition connected  with  a license to distribute

    goods  which  use the relevant mark or a provisional

    decision from the authorized party;

    c. other similar prohibition stipulated by a government

    regulation.

    (4) The erasing of registration of the mark as meant in

    paragraph (2) is recorded in the Mark General List and

    announced in Mark Gazette.

    (5) Any objection against the decision on the erasing of

    registration of a mark as meant in paragraph (2) can

    be submitted to the Court of Commerce.

    Article 62

    '.) Every application for erasing the registration of a mark

    of goods and/ or services partly or  wholly  by the owner

    of the mark is submitted to the Directorate General.

    (2) In the case of the mark as meant in paragraph (1) being

    still  committed to a licensing agreement, the erasing

    only can be done if the matter is approved in writing  by

    the licensee.

    (3) The exception from the approval as meant in paragraph

    (1) is only possible if in the licensing agreement, the

    licensee firmly agrees to put aside the agreement.

    (4) The erasing of registration of the mark as meant in

    paragraph (1) is recorded in the Mark General List and

    announced in Mark Gazette.

    Article 63

    The erasing of registration of a mark on the basis

    of the reasons as meant in Article 61 letters a and b also

    can be submitted by the third party in the form of a litiga

    tion to the Court of Commerce.

    Article 64

    (1) Only appeal to the Supreme Court can be  filed  against

    the decision of the Court of Commerce as meant in

    Article 63.

    (2) The content of the decision of the judicial institution as

    meant  in paragraph (1) is promptly conveyed by the

    secretary of the relevant court to the DirectorateGeneral after the date when the decision is made.

    (3) The Directorate General erases the relevant mark from

    the Mark General List and announces it in Mark Gazette

    if the decision of the judicial institution as meant in

    paragraph (1) has been accepted and had permanent

    legal power.

    Article 65

    ( l) The Directorate General erases the registration of a

    mark by delisting the relevant mark from the Mark

    General  List and putting a note about the reason for

    and date of the erasing.

    (2) The erasing of the registration as meant in paragraph

    (1) is notified in  writing  to the owner of the mark or

    his/ her proxy by mentioning the reason for the erasing

    and affirming that certificate of the relevant mark is

    declared ineffective anymore as from the date of

    delisting from the Mark General List.

    (3) The erasing of registration of a mark causes the termi

    nation of legal protection of the relevant mark.

    Article 66

    (1) The Directorate General can erase the registration of a

    collective mark on the basis of:

    a.  the application of the owner of a collective mark

    with  the  written  approval of all users of the collec

    tive mark;

    b. sufficient evidence that the collective mark is not

    used for 3 (three) years consecutively as from the

    date of registration or the last use, unless there are

    reasons acceptable by the Directorate General.

    c. sufficient evidence that the collective mark is used

    for goods or services not suitable to the goods or

    services whose application is requested for;

    d.  sufficient evidence that the collective mark is not

    used in accordance  with  the regulation on the use of

    a collective mark.

    (2) The application for erasing the registration of a collec

    tive mark as meant in paragraph (1) letter a is submit

    ted to the Directorate General.

    (3) The erasing of registration of the collective mark as

    meant  in paragraph (2) is registered in the Mark

    General List and announced in Mark Gazette.

    Article 67

    The erasing of registration of a collective mark

    also can be  filed  by the third party in the form of a lawsuit

    to the Court of Commerce on the basis of the reasons as

    meant in Article 66 paragraph (1) letter b, c or d.

    Part Two

    Annulment

    Article 68

    (1) A lawsuit for nullifying the registration of a mark can

    be  filed  by the interesting party on the basis of the

    reason as meant in Article 4, 5 or 6.

    (2) Owners of unregistered marks can  filed  the lawsuit as

    meant in paragraph (1) after submitting applications

    to the Directorate General.

    (3) The lawsuit for the annulment as meant in paragraph

    (1) is submitted to the Court of Commerce.

    (4) In the case of the plaintiff and defendant being domi

    ciled outside the territory of the Republic of Indonesia,

    the lawsuit can be submitted to the Court of Commerce

    in J akarta.

    Article 69

    (1) A lawsuit fcr nullifying a mark only can be submitted in

    a period of 5 (five) years as from the date of registra

    tion of the mark.

    Business News 6661-6662/ 12-9- 2001 (21 A  lawswit

  • 8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e

    10/18

    18A

    (2) A lawsuit for nullifying can be submitted without dead

    line, if the mark contravenes religious morality, decency

    or public order.

    Article 70

    (1) Only appeal to the Supreme Court can be  field  against

    a verdict of the Court of Commerce deciding a lawsuit

    for nullifying.

    (2) The content of the verdict of the judicial institution as

    meant in paragraph (1) is promptly conveyed by the

    relevant secretary of the court to the Directorate

    General after the date when the decision is made.

    (3) The Directorate General nullifies the registration of the

    relevant mark at the Mark General List and announces

    it in Mark Gazette after the decision of the judicial

    institution as meant in paragraph (1) is received and

    has permanent legal power.

    Article 71

    \ )The Directorate General nullifies the registration of a

    mark by delisting the mark from the Mark General List

    and putting a note about the reasons and the date of

    annullment.

    (2) The annullment of the registration as meant in para

    graph (1) is notified in  writing to the owner of the mark

    or his/ her proxy by mentioning reasons for the

    annullment and affirming that certificate of the relevant

    mark is declared ineffective anymore as from the date

    of delisting from the Mark General List.

    (3) The delisting of registration of a mark from the Mark

    General List as meant in paragraph (1) is announced in

    Mark Gazette.

    (4) The annullment and delisting of registration of a markcauses the termination of legal protection for the

    relevant mark.

    Article 72

    In addition to the reason for the annullment as

    meant in Article 68 paragraph (1), the annullment of a

    ^gistered collective mark also can be requested to the

    _ ourt of the Commerce if the use of the collective mark

    contravenes the provision as meant in Article 50 paragraph

    CD-

    CHAPTER IX

    ADMINI STRATI ON OF MARK

    Article 73

    The administration of mark as stipulated in.this

    law is executed by the Directorate General.

    Article 74

    The Directorate General operates a national mark

    information and documentation network system capable

    of providing information on mark to the public.

    CHAPTER X

    C O S T

    Article 75

    ( l)The submission of every application or application for

    the extension of mark, application for obtaining a copy

    of the Mark General List, the recording of transfer of

    right, the change in name and/ or address of a holder

    of a registered mark, the recording of a licensing agree-

    meiit, objection against an application, application for

    appeal as  well  as others determined in this law is sub

     jected to a cost whose amount is stipulated by a

    government regulation.

    (2) Further provisions on the requirements, period and

    procedures for the payment as meant in paragraph (1)

    are stipulated by a presidential decree.

    (3) The Directorate General, based on the approval of the

    Minister and the Minister of Finance, can use revenue

    coming from the cost as meant in paragraphs (1) and

    (2) on the basis of   laws  in force.

    CHAPTER XI

    SETTLEMENT  OF DI SPUTE

    Part One

    Lawsuit Against Mark Violation

    Article 76

    (1) The owner of a registered mark can  file a lawsuit against

    every party that without right uses a mark having

    resemblance principally or totally for goods or services

    of the same kind in the form of:

    a.  lawsuit for compensation; and/ or

    b. termination of all activities connected  with  the use

    c»" the said mark.

    (2) The lawsuit as meant in paragraph (1) is submitted to

    the Court of Commerce.

    Article 77The lawsuit against the mark violation as meant

    in Article 76 can be submitted by a licensee of a registered

    mark individually and together  with  the owner of the

    relevant mark.

    Article 78

    {l )When the examination is underway and in order to pre

    vent the occurrence of a bigger loss, based on a

    request of the holder of a mark or licensee as a plain

    tiff,  the law can order the defendant to stop producing,

    distributing and/ or trading goods or services using the

    mark without right.

    (2) In the case of the defendant being also demanded togive up goods  which  use the mark without right, the

     judge can order that the delivery of goods or value of

    the good is done after the decision of the court has

    permanent legal power.

    Article 79

    Only appeal to the Supreme Court can be  filed

    against the decision of the Court of Commerce.

    Part Two ( To be continued )

    Business News 6661-6662/ 12-9-2001

  • 8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e

    11/18

    16A

    M A R K

    (Law  No. 15/ 2001 dated Aug ust 1,2001)

     / Con t in ued f r om Bu si nes s New s   No. 6661 -  6662 pages   9A - ISA J

    Part Two

    Procedure for litigating in the Court of Commerce

    Article 80(1) A lawsuit for nullifying the registration of a mark is

    submitted to the Chairman of the Court of Commerce

    in jurisdiction of address or domicile of the defendant.

    (2) In the case of the defendant being domiciled outside

    the territory of Indonesia, the lawsuit is submitted to

    the Chairman of Central Jakarta Court of Commerce.

    (3) The secretary of the court registers the lawsuit for the

    annullment on the date of submission of the relevant

    lawsuit and gives a  written  evidence of receipt signed

    by the secretary to the plaintiff   with  the same date as

    the date of registration of the lawsuit.

    (4) The secretary conveys the lawsuit for the annullment

    to the Chairman of the Court of Commerce not later

    than 2 (two) days as from the date of registration of

    the lawsuit.

    (5) Not later than 3 (three) days as from the date of

    registration of the lawsuit for the annullment, the Court

    of Commerce studies the lawsuit and stipulates the

    date of legal proceedings.

    (6) The legal proceedings for the lawsuit for the annul

    ment  are executed not later than 60 (sixty) days after

    the registration of the lawsuit.

    (7) The  bailiff   summons parties not later than 7 (seven)

    days  after the registration of the lawsuit for the

    annullment.

    (8) A decision on the lawsuit for the annulment must be

    read out not later than 90 (ninety) days after the  reg

    istration of the lawsuit and the period can be extended

    to another term of 30 (thirty) days at the maximum

    on the basis of the approval of the Chairman of the

    Supreme  Court.

    (9) The decision on the lawsuit for the annulment as meant

    in paragraph (8)  which  completely contains legal con

    siderations being the basis for the said decision must

    be read out in legal proceedings open for the public

    and can be executed first, even though a legal action

    is  filed  against the decision.

    (10) The  bailiff   must convey content of the decision of the

    Court of Commerce as meant in paragraph (9) to par

    ties not later than 14 (fourten) days after the decision

    on the lawsuit for the annullment is read out.

    Article 81

    The procedure for litigating as regulated in Article

    80 is effective mutatis mutandis for the lawsuit as stipu

    lated in Article 76.

    Part Three

    Appeal to the Supreme Court

    Article 82

    Only appeal can be  filed  against the decision of

    the Court of Commerce as meant in Article 80 paragraph

    (8).

    Article 83

    (1) Every application for the appeal as meant in Article 82

    must be submitted not later than 14 (fourteen) days

    after the date of the decision against  which  appeal is

    requested is read out or notified to parties by means

    of registering it to the secretary of the court already

    deciding the lawsuit.

    (2) The secretary of the court registers the appeal for the

    Supreme  Court on the date of submission of the re

    levant application and a  written  receipt signed by the

    secretary of the court  with  the date being the same as

    that of receipt of registration is given to the applicant

    of the appeal.

    (3) The applicant of appeal to the Supreme Court must

    have  conveyed an appeal memory to the secretary of

    the court in 7 (seven) days as from the date of regis

    tration of the application for the appeal as meant in

    paragraph (1).

    (4) The secretary of the court is obliged to send the

    application for the appeal and the appeal memory as

    meant in paragraph (3) to the defendant in the

    appeal not later than 2 (two) days after the date of

    registration of the appeal.

    (5) The defendant can  file  contra-appeal memory to the

    secretary of the court not later than 7 (seven) days

    after the date of receipt the appeal memory as meant

    in paragraph (4) by the relevant defendant and the

    secretary of the court is obliged to convey the contra-appeal memory to the applicant of the appeal not later

    than 2 (two) days after the secretary of the court re

    ceives the contra-appeal memory.

    (6) The secretary of the court is obliged to documents of

    the relevant appeal to the Supreme Court not later

    than 7 (seven) days after the period as meant in para

    graph (5) elapses.

    (7) The Supreme Court must study the documents of the

    appeal as meant in paragraph (6) and stipulate the

    date of legal proceedings not later than 2 (two) days

    after the application for the appeal is received by the

    Supreme  Court.

    (8) Legal proceedings for examining the application for

    the appeai must be done not later than 60 (sixty) days

    after the date of receipt of the application by the

    Supreme  Court.

    (9) A decision on the application for the appeal must be

    read out not later than 90 (ninety) days as from the

    date of receipt of the application by the Supreme Court.

    (10) The decision on the application for the appeal as meant

    in paragraph (9) completely containing legal conside

    rations  which  become the basis for the said decision

    must  be read out in legal proceedings open for the

    public.

    Business News 6664-6665/19-9-2001 flPT he

  • 8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e

    12/18

    17A

    (11) The secretary of the Supreme Court is obliged to con

    vey  the content of the decision on the appeal to the

    secretary of the court not later than 3 (three) days

    after the decision on the application for the appeal is

    read out.

    (12) Bailiff must convey the content of the decision on theappeal as meant in paragraph (I ) to the plaintiff and

    defendant of the appeal not later than 2 (two) days

    after the decision is received.

    Part Four

    Alternative for Settlement of Dispute

    Article 64

    In addition to the settlement of the lawsuit as

    meant in Part One of this Chapter, parties can settle dis

    putes through arbitration or alternative for the settlement

    of disputes.

    CHAPTER XII

    PROVIS IONAL STIPULATION OF THE COURT

    Article 85

    Based on sufficient evidence, every party whose

    right is inflicted can ask the judges of the Court of   Com

    merce to issue a provisional stipulation on:

    a.  the prevention of goods connected  with  the violation

    against mark rights from coming in.

    b. the storage of evidence connected with  violation against

    the rights.

    Article 86

    (1) Every application for the provisional stipulation is sub

    mitted in  writing  to the Court of Commerce  with  the

    requirements as  follow:

    a.  attaching evidence of right ownership;

    b. attaching evidence of strong  initial  indications of vio

    lation against mark;

    c. clear information on goods and/or documents asked,

    sought, gathered and collected for proving;

    d.  having fears that parties allegedly violating mark   will

    be able easily to make the evidence disappear;

    e. paying guarantee in form of cash money or bank

    guarantee.

    (2) In the case of the provisional stipulation as meant inArticle 85 being already executed, the Court of   Com

    merce promptly notifies parties subjected to actions

    and open opportunity for the parties to have their

    information heard.

    Article 67

    In the case of the judge of the Court of   Com

    merce  already issuing a provisional stipulation, the judge

    of the Court of Commerce examining the dispute must

    decide to amend, revoke or fortify the stipulation as meant

    in Article 85 not later than 30 (thirty) days as from the

    date of issuance of the stipulation.

    Article 88

    If the provisional stipulation is:

    a.   fo r t i f i ed ,  the  g u a r a n t e e  money  a l r eady pa id mus t  be

    r e t u r n e d  to the  app l i can t  of th e  s t i pu la t i on  and the  sair.

    app l i can t  can  f i le  t he  l a w s u i t  as  m e a n t  in  Article  76;

    b . r e v o k e d ,  t h e  g u a r a n t e e m o n e y a l r e a d > p a i d  m u s 'p rom pt l y g i ven  up to the  pa r ty sub j ec ted  to th e  ac t ion

    as  a  compensation for the provisional stipulation.

    CHAPTER  XIII

    INVESTIGATION

    Article 89

    (1) In addition to the investigators of the Indonesian Po

    lice  Force, certain civil servant officials at the Direc

    torate General are given special authority to act as the

    investigators as meant in Law No. 8/1981 on Civil Code,

    to investigate crimes in the mark field.

    (2) The civil servant investigators as meant in paragraph

    (1) are authorized to:

    a.  examine the truth of lawsuits connected crimes in

    the mark field;

    b. investigate persons or statutory bodies allegedly

    committing crimes in the mark, field  on the basis of

    the lawsuits as meant in letter a;

    c. ask information and evidence from persons or statu

    tory bodies in connection  with  crimes in the mark

    field;

    d.  audit the bookkeeping, records and other documents

    connected  with  crimes in the mark field;

    e. undertake examination in certain places allegedl>

    containing evidence, bookkeeping, records and other

    documents as  well  as confiscating materials anc

    products of the violation  which  can be used as  evi

    dence in a criminal case in the mark field; and

    f. ask assistance from experts in the framework of

    execution of tasks of investigation into crimes in the

    mark field;

    (3) The civil servant investigators as meant in paragraph

    (1) notify the commencement of investigation anc

    results of their investigation to investigators of the

    Indonesian  Police  Force.

    (4) The civil servant investigators as meant  in  paragrapl

    (1) convey results of their investigation to Public Pro

    secutors through investigators of the Indonesian  Polict

    Force by observing the provision in Article 10 of Lav

    No.  8/1981 on Criminal Code.

    CHAPTER XIV

    CRIMINAL PROVISION

    Article 90

    Whoever intentionally and unrightfully uses a marl

    totally the same as a registered mark belonging to th.

    other party for goods and/ or services of the same kirn

    which  are produced and/ or traded is sentenced to impris

    onment of 5 (five) years at the maximum and/or a fine c

    Rp 1,000,000,000.00 (one  billion  rupiah) at the maximum

    Business News 6664-6665/ 19-9- 2001 Article 91

  • 8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e

    13/18

    ISA

    Article 91

    Whoever intentionally and unrightfully uses a mark

    principally the same as a registered mark belonging to the

    other party for goods and/ or services of the same kind

    which  are produced and/ or traded is sentenced to impri

    sonment of 4 (five) years at the maximum and/ or a fine of

    Rp 800,000,000.00 (eight hundred million) at the maxi

    mum.

    Article 92

    (1) Whoever intentionally and unrightfully uses a mark

    totally the same as a geographical indication belong

    ing to the other party for goods and/ or services of the

    same  kind  which  are produced and/ or traded is  sen

    tenced to imprisonment of 5 (five) years at the maxi

    mum and/or a fine of Rp 1,000,000,000.00 (one  billion

    rupiah) at the maximum.

    (2) Whoever intentionally and unrightfully uses a mark

    principal ly the same as a geographical indication

    belonging to the other party for goods and/ or services

    of the same kind  which  are produced and/ or traded is

    sentenced to imprisonment.of 4 (five) years at the

    maximum and/ or a fine of Rp 800,000,000.00 (eight

    hundred million) at the maximum.

    (3) The provisions as meant in paragraphs (1) and (2) are

    applied to the attachment of actual origin to products

    resulting from a violation or the attachment of words

    showing that the said products constitute imitation of

    a registered and protected mark on the basis of geo

    graphical indications.

    Article 93Whoever intentionally and unrightfully uses a pro

    tected mark on the basis of indications of origin in goods

    or services thus having capable of deceiving or misleading

    the public about the origin of the goods or services is  sen

    tenced to imprisonment of 4 (four) years at the maximum

    and/ or Rp 800,000,000.00 (eight hundred million) at the

    laximum.

    Article 94

    (1) Whoever trading goods and/ or services ascertained or

    noteworthy to ascertain that the said goods and/ or ser

    vices result from the violations as meant in Articles 90,

    91 and 93 is sentenced to imprisonment of one year atthe maximum and/ cr a fine of Rp 200,CC ? #000.00 (two

    hundred million) at the maximum.

    (2) Thc crime  as  meant in paragraph (1)  is a violation.

    Article 95

    The crimes as meant in Articles 90, 91, 92, 93

    and 94 constitute actions liable to litigate.

    CHAPTER XV

    TRANSI TI ONAL PROVISION

    Article 96

    (1) Every applicat ion for the extension of protection

    period of a registered mark, the recording of transfer

    of a right, the recording of change in name and/ or

    address,  request for delisting or annulment of regis

    tration of a mark submitted on the basis of Law No.

    19/ 1992 as already amended by Law No. 14/ 1997 on

    mark but the application is not yet completed upon

    the date of enforcement of this law is settled on thebasis of the provisions in the said law.

    (2) All marks already registered on the basis of Law No.

    19/ 1992 as meant in Law No. 14/ 199-7 on mark and

    still  valid upon the promulgat ion of this law are

    declared to remain valid according to this law for the

    remainder of their respective registration periods.

    Article 97

    Lawsuits for the annulment of the marks as meant

    in Article 96 paragraph (2) can continue to be submitted

    to the Court of Commerce as meant in Article 68, on the

    basis of the reasons as meant in Articles 4, 5 and 6.

    Article 98

    Disputes over marks  which  are  still  processed in

    the court upon the enforcement of this law continue to be

    processed on the basis of Law No. 19/ 1992 as already

    amended by Law No. 14/ 1997 on mark   until  they obtain

    decisions having permanent legal power.

    Article 99

    All technical directives made on the basis of Law

    No. 19/1992 as already amended by Law No. 14/1997 on

    mark  which  have existed upon the enforcement of this law

    are declared to remain effective as long as they do not

    contravene this law or are not yet replaced by new regula

    tions on the basis of this law.

    CHAPTER XVI

    CONCLUSION

    Article 100

    With  the enforcement of this law, Law No. 19/

    1992 as already amended by Law No. 14/ 1997 on mark is

    declared null and void.

    Article 101

    This law comes into force as from the date of pro

    mulgation.

    For public cognizance", this law shall be promul

    gated by placing it in Statute Book of the Republic of

    Indonesia.

    Ratified in Jakarta

    On August  1,2001

    THE  PRESI DENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF I NDONESIA

    sgd

    MEGAWATI SOEKARNOPUTRI

    Business News 6664-6665/19-9-2001 Promulgated

  • 8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e

    14/18

    19A

    Promulgated in J akarta

    On August  1,2001

    THE  SECRETARY OF  STATE

    sgd

    MUHAMMAD M. BASYUNI

    STATUTE  BOOK OF

    THE  REPUBLIC OF INDONESI A OF 2001 NO. 110

    ELUCIDATION

    O N

    LAW NO. 15/2001

    CONCERNING

    M A R K

    I. GENERAL

    The widespread globalization in both social, eco

    nomic, cultural and other  life  sectors is a development

    which  is actual and seizes thorough attention in the last

    decade as  well  as a trend  which  stifl  continues in the future. Developments of technology, information and trans

    portation have caused trading activities to  grow  rapidly

    and even positioned the  world  as the collective sole mar

    ket.

    The global trade era only can be maintained if a

    climate of fair business competition is existent. In this case,

    marks  play a very important role, requiring a more

    adequate regulation  system.  Based on the said develop

    ments and in line  with  international agreements already

    ratified by Indonesia as  well  as experiences from execut

    ing the mark administration, the mark law, namely Law

    No. 19/1992 (Statute Book of 1992 No. 81) as already

    amended  by Law No. 14/ 1997 (Statute Book of 1997 No.

    37) hereinafter called  the o ld mark law   needs to be

    improved by a new mark law.

    Compared  to the old mark law, contrast differ

    ences in this law deal with, among others, the settlement

    of an application. Pursuant to this law, substantive exami

    nation is executed after the applications  fulfill administra

    tive requirements. Previously, the substantive examination

    is executed after the completion of announcement of marks.

    The amendment is intended to enable parties faster to

    ascertain whether the application is accepted or rejected,

    and open opportunity for other parties to raise objections

    against applications already approved for registration.

    Under the new law, the announcement period is 3 (three)

    months,  shorter than that in the old law. As a result of the

    cutting of the announcement period, the settlement pe

    riod of an application  will  be shorter totally in the frame

    work of enhancing service for the public.

    In connection  with  a priority right, this law stipu

    lates that in the case of an application  failing  to meet  evi

    dence of receipt of an application resulting in the priority

    right for the first time in 3 (three) months after the expi

    ration of the priority right, the said application  will  be

    treated as an ordinary application without the priority right.

    Another matter deals  with  the rejection of an

    application being the loss of an application. For that pur

    pose,  it needs regulation capable of helping the applicant

    to ascertain reasons for the rejection of his/ her applica

    tion more clearly by first notifying the applicant that the

    application  will  be turned down.

    In addition to the protection of trade and service

    marks,  this law also regulates the protection of a geographical indication, namely a sign showing the region of

    origin of a product because of geographical factors, in

    cluding natural or human factor or combination thereof,

    giving certain characteristics and quality to the produc

    tion. Moreover, it also regulates an indication of origin.

    Subsequently,  in the  view  of the fact that a mark

    constitutes part of economic/ business activities, the settle

    ment of a dispute over a mark needs a special j udicial

    institution, namely the Court of Commerce so that the dis

    pute over the mark can be settled in a relatively fast

    period.  In relation thereto, special law must also regu

    lated to settle disputes over mark, including intellectual

    property rights. The special court for the settlement ofdisputes over mark and intellectual property rights is also

    known in other countries, such as Thailand. In this law,

    the owner of a mark is also given iegal protection efforts,

    such as prov is ional st ipulat ion   to prevent his/ her mark from

    suffering a bigger loss. In addition, this also contain pro

    visions on arbitration and alternative for the settlement of

    disputes to provide wider opportunity in the settlement of

    the disputes.

    This law results in the regulation on mark in a

    single text so as to better facilitate the public to use it. In

    this case, provisions in the old law whose substances are

    not changed, are contained again in this law.

    II. ARTICLE BY ARTICLE

    Articles 1 and 1

    Sufficiently clear

    Article 3

    Unless otherwise stipulated firmly, what is meant

    by parties in this article and subsequent articles in this law

    is  someone , severa l persons co l l ect i ve l y or s ta tu to ry

    bod ies .

    Article 4

    An applicant having good intention is an applica

    tion registering his/her mark properly and honestly without having any intention to get ride on, copy or crib the

    popularity of a mark belonging another party in the inter

    est of his/ her business that  inflicts  a loss on the other

    party or causes unfair business competition, carelessness

    or  misleading to consumers. For example, trade mark A

    already known generally by the public for years is cribbed

    in such a way so as to have resemblance to the trade mark

    A principally or totally. Since the imitator has committed

    the bad intention in the example, elen.ents of his/ her

    intention in copying the already known traJ e mark at least

    are noteworthy to ascertain.

    Business News 6664-6665/19-9-2001 Article 5

  • 8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e

    15/18

    20A

    Article 5

    Letter a

    The use of a mark capable of hurting the feeling,

    polite  behavior, orderliness and religiosity of public or cer

    tain  groups of the society is included  into  the  definition

    contravening religious morality, decency or public order.

    Letter b

    A mark is considered not having distinguishability

    if the mark is too simple, such as being  line  mark or spot

    mark, or too complicated so as to be unclear.

    Letter c

    An example of the mark is the mark of skull above

    two crossing bones,  which  have been publicly  known  as

    the danger mark. Such a mark is a mark being general in

    the nature and already belonging to the public property.

    In relation thereto, the sign cannot be used as a mark.

    Letter d

    The mark connects  with  or only mentions goods

    or  services whose registration is requested, e.g. mark of

    coffee or coffee picture for coffee or coffee products.

    .rticle  6

    Paragraph (1)

    Letter a

    What is meant by  s imi la r i ty in pr inc ip le   is the

    resemblance caused by significant elements between a

    mark and other mark,  which  can result in the impression

    of similarity in both form, placement method, writing  way

    or  combination of elements and similarity of pronuncia

    tion  contained in the mark.

    Letter b

    The rejection of an application having similarity

    principally and  wholly  to a popular mark for goods and/ or

    services of the same kind is done by observing the public

    knowledge about the mark in the relevant business field.

    In addition, reputation of the popular mark acquired due

    to intensive and massive promotion, investments in coun

    tries  which  are executed by the owner and accompanied

    by evidence of registration of the mark in countries also

    needs to be observed. In the case of the above mentioned

    matters being considered not sufficient yet, the Court of

    Tommerce  can instruct an independent  institution  to carry

    out a survey for making a conclusion whether the mark

    becoming the basis for the rejection is popular or not.

    Letter c

    Sufficiently clear

    Paragraph (2)

    Sufficiently clear

    Paragraph (3)

    Letter a

    Name   o f s ta tu to r y body   means the name of the

    statutory body used as a mark and registered at the Mark

    General List.

    Letter b

    Nat iona l ins t i tu t i ons   includes mass organizations

    and social  political  organizations.

    Letter c

    Sufficiently clear

    Article  7

    Sufficiently clear

    Article S

    Paragraph (1)

    In principle, an application can be submitter "ror

    m ora than  one class of goods and/ or services in accor

    dance  w i th  provisions of Trade Mark Treaty already rati

    fied  by  Presidential Decree No. 17/ 1997.

    It  a i m s  at  facilitating  the mark owner planning to

    use his/her mark for several goods and/ or services of seve

    ral classes  which  are not necessary to get occupied by

    administrative procedures requiring the separate regula

    tion  on an application for every class of the goods and/ or

    services.

    Paragraphs (2) and (3)

    Sufficiently clear

    Article 9

    Sufficiently clear

    Article 10

    Paragraph (1)

    This provision also applies to applications using a

    priority right.

    Paragraph (2)

    Sufficiently clear

    Article 11

    This provision aims at accommodating the state

    interest being a member of the  Paris  Convention for the

    Protection of Industrial Property 1883 (as already amended

    several  times) or the Agreement Establishing the  World

    Trade Organization.

    Article 12

    Paragraph (1)

    The evidence of a priority right is in the form of

    application for registration along evidence of receipt of

    the application also providing affirmation on the date of

    receipt of the application. If   what  is conveyed is in the

    form of copy or photocopy of the receipt, the endorse

    ment of the copy or photocopy of the receipt is granted by

    the Directorate General in the case of the application is

    submitted for the  first  time.

    Paragraph (2)

    Translation is done by a sworn in translator.

    Paragraph (3)

    Sufficiently clear

    Article 13

    Paragraph (1)

    Sufficiently clear

    Paragraph (2)

    Date o f d ispa tch   means the date of dispatch on

    the basis of postal stamp.

    Paragraph (3)

    Sufficiently clear

    Business  News  6664-6665/19-9-2001 Article 14

  • 8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e

    16/18

  • 8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e

    17/18

    22A

    Paragraph (4)

    Sufficiently clear -

    Paragraph (5)

    The stipulation that the legal consequences are

     just effective after the transfer of right to the mark is

    recorded in the Mark Genera! List is intended to facilitate

    supervision and realize legal certainty.

    Article 41

    Paragraph (L)

    Sufficiently clear

    Paragraph (2)

    The transfer of right to a service mark in this para

    graph can only be done if there is a guarantee from both

    the mark owner or mark licensee or recipient of license, to

    maintain the quality of service traded.

    For the purpose, it needs a special guideline for

    mulated by the mark owner ( licenser or party transferring

    the mark) on methods of or procedures for providing ser

    vices attached by the mark.

    .rticle 42 up to article 45

    Sufficiently clear

    Article 46

    In the case of the owner of a registered mark not

    using his/her mark directly in the trade of goods or ser

    vices in Indonesia, the use of the mark by a licensee is the

    same  as the use by the owner of the registered mark. It

    connects  with  possibilities of delisting of registration of

    marks  which  are not used in the trade of goods or services

    for 3 (three) months consecutively as meant in Article 61

    paragraph (2) letter a.

    Article 47 up to article 49

    Sufficiently clear

    Article 50

    Paragraphs (1) and (2)

    Sufficiently clear

    aragraph (3)

    Provisions on, amongst others, nature, general

    characteristics and quality of goods or services as  well  as

    their supervision contain a definition that there are

    requirements which  must be  fulfilled  by parties taking part

    in using the collective mark.

    Paragraph (4)

    Sufficiently clear

    Article 51 up to article 55

    Sufficiently clear

    Article 56

    • Paragraph (1)

    A geographical indication is an indication or iden

    tity  of a product originating on a certain place, region or

    territory that shows the quality, reputation and character

    istics, including natural and human factors used as an

    attribute of the product. Marks  which  can be used as a

    geographical condition can take the form of etiquette or

    label attached to the production. The marks can be in the

    form of name of place, region or territory, word, picture,

    letter or combination of the elements. The name of place

    can originate from a name mentioned in the geographical

    map  or name known as the name of place of origin of thesaid product due to the continuous use. The protection of

    geographical indication covers natural resources, agricul

    tural products, handicraft; or certain industrial products.

    Paragraph (2)

    Ins t i tu t i ons represen t ing comm un i t i es in reg ions

    produc ing goods   are institutions authorized to register

    geographical indications and the institutions constitute

    government institutions or other  official  institutions, such

    as cooperatives, associations and others.

    Paragraph (3) up to paragraph (9)

    Sufficiently clear

    Article 57 up to article 60Sufficiently clear

    Article 61

    Paragraph (1)

    Sufficiently clear

    Paragraph (2)

    Letter a

    The latest use means the use of the mark for goods

    or  services  which  are traded. The moment of the latest

    use is calculated from the date of the latest use even though

    the goods are  still  distributing in communities.

    Letter b

    The unsuitability in the use covers the unsuitabil-

    ity in the form of   writing  of   word  or letter or the unsuit

    ability in the use of different color.

    Paragraph (3) up to paragraph (5)

    Sufficiently clear

    Article 62 up to article 67

    Sufficiently clear

    Article 68

    Paragraph (1)

    Interesting parties means, amongst others, pro

    secutor, consumer advocacy foundations/institutions and

    religious councils/ institutions.

    Paragraph (2) up to paragraph (4)

    Sufficiently clear

    Article 69

    Paragraph (1)

    Sufficiently clear

    Paragraph (2)-

    The definition  con t raven ing re l i g ious   mo ra l i t y ,

    decency or publ ic order   is the same as that as contained

    in elucidation on Article 5 letter a. Also included into the

    definition contravening public order is bad intention.

    Business News 6664-6665/19-9-2001 Article 70

  • 8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e

    18/18

    23A

    Article 70 up to article 74

    Sufficiently clear

    Article 75

    Paragraphs (1) and (2)

    Sufficiently clear

    Paragraph (3)

    This law stipulates provisions on possibilities of

    the use of part of non-tax state revenue  (PNBP)  by the

    Directorate General, which  comes from all costs connected

    with  mark.

    To use t he revenue   means the use of   PNBP  on the

    basis of systems and mechanisms in force. In this case,

    the  whole  revenue is remitted directly to the state trea

    sury  office  as  PNBP.  Later, the Directorate General through

    the Minister submits an application to the Minister of

    Finance for using part of   PNBP  in accordance with  the need

    permitted by law,  which  is now regulated in Law No. 20/

    1997 on Non-Tax State Revenue (Statute Book of 1997

    No. 43).

    Article 76 up to article 79

    Sufficiently clear

    Article 80

    Paragraph (1)

    Chairman of the Court of Commerce means the

    Chairman  of the Court of Commerce in place where the

    Court of Commerce is located.

    Paragraph (2)

    Sufficiently clear

    Paragraph (3)

    Unless otherwise stipulated, the secretary of the

    court as meant in this law is the secretary of the Court of

    Commerce.

    Paragraph (4) up to paragraph (6)

    Sufficiently clear

    Paragraph (7)

    Bailiff   means a  bailiff   at the State Court/ Court of

    Commerce.

    Paragraph (8) up to paragraph (10)

    Sufficiently clear

    Articles 81 and 82

    Sufficiently clear

    Article 83

    Paragraph (1) up to paragraph (5)

    Sufficiently clear

    Paragraph (6)

    Documents of appeal means application for

    appeal,  appeal memory, and/ or contra-appeal memory as

    well  as other documents.

    Paragraph (7) up to paragraph (12)

    Sufficiently clear

    Article 84

    Sufficiently clear

    Article 85

    Letter a

    This provision is intended to prevent the party

    whose right is violated from suffering a bigger loss so that

    the Court of Commerce is authorized to issue a provisional

    stipulation for preventing the continuous violation and

    goods allegedly violating right to a mark from coming  into

    trading lanes, including the importation.

    Legal action of appeal or appeal to the Supreme

    Court cannot  filed  against the provisional stipulation.

    Letter b

    The provision aims at preventing violators from

    causing the evidence to despair.

    Article 86

    Paragraph (1)

    Letter a

    Evidence   o f ma rk owne rsh ip   means a certificate

    of mark. In the case of the applicant of stipulation being a

    licensee, the evidence can be in the form of letter of

    recording of licensing agreement.

    Letter b

    Sufficiently clear

    Letter c

    The information is in the form of details of kinds

    of goods or kinds of serv ices suspec ted as products

    resulting from the violation against mark.

    Letter d

    Sufficiently clear

    Letter e

    The amount of guarantee is equal to the value of

    goods or the value of services subj ected to the provisional

    stipulation.

    Paragraph (2)

    Sufficiently clear

    Article 87

    Sufficiently clear

    Article 88

    Letter a

    Sufficiently clear

    Letter b

    In the case of the guarantee money being in the

    form of bank guarantee, the judge instructs for cashing

    out the guarantee  into  cash money.

    Articles 89 up to article 101

    Sufficiently clear

    SUPPLEMENT TO STATUTE BOOK OF

    THE  REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NO. 4131

    Business  News  6664-6665/19-9-2001


Recommended