Date post: | 05-Jul-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | artna-btari |
View: | 223 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 18
8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e
1/18
9A
M R K
Warning
The Library Depar tment has an electr onic collection of laws and regulatio ns, which hav e
either been d ownloade d f rom the websi tes of government , Non-gove rnment or private
commpanies or sel f -scanned from various publications. It should be noted that these
materials are only intended for internal use within the Firm. A l l lawyers, paralegals, interns,
secretaries and support staff should only be using these materials in the appropriate manner.
It is strongly advised not to send any sof tcopies and/or hardcopies di rectly to third parties
bearing in mind the potential risk of Violation of the provisions of the prevailing Copyright Law.
(Law No. 15/ 2001 dated Augu st 1,2001)
BY THE GRACE OF GOD ALMIGHTY
THE PRESI DENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA,
Considering:
a. that in the global trade era, in line with the ratificationof international conventions by Indonesia, the role of
marks becomes very important, particularly in main
taining the sound business competition;
b. that in relation thereto, marks need adequate regula
tion to provide better service for the public;
c. that based on the considerations in letters a and b as
well as observing experience from the implementation
of the existing mark taw, it is deemed necessary to
replace Law No. 19/ 1992 on mark as already amended
by Law No. 14/ 1997 concerning the amendment to Law
No. 19/ 1992 on mark;
In view of:
1. Article 5 paragraph (1), Article 20 and Article 33 of the
Constitution of 1945;
2. Law No. 7/1994 on the ratification of the Agreement
Establishing the World Trade Organization (Statute Book
of 1994 No. 57, Supplement to Statute Book No. 3564);
With the approval of
THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF
THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA
D E C I D E S :
To stipulate :
LAW ON MARK
CHAPTER I
GENERAL PROVISION
Article 1
Referred to in this law as:
1. . lark is a sign in the form of picture, name, word, let
ters, figures, configuration of colors or combination of
the said elements which has distinguishabiiity and is
used in trading activities of goods and services.
2. Trade mark is a mark used in goods traded by some
body or several persons collectively or statutory bodies for distinguishing the goods from other goods of
the same kind.
3. Service mark is a mark used in services traded by some
body or several persons collectively or statutory bo
dies for distinguishing the services from other goods of
the same kind.
4. Collective mark is a mark used in goods and/ or ser
vices of the same characteristics which are traded by
somebody or several persons collectively or statutory
bodies for distinguishing the goods and/or services from
other goods/services of the same kind.
5. Application is a request for the registration of mark
submitted in writing to the Directorate General,
6. Applicant is a party submitting an application.
7. Auditor is a mark examiner, namely an official appointed
by a ministerial decree, and tasked to examine appli
cations for the registration of marks because of his/ her
expertise.
8. Proxy is a consultant of intellectual property rights.
9. Minister is the minister overseeing a department with a
scope of tasks and responsibility covering intellectual
property rights, including mark.
10. Directorate General is the Directorate General of
Intellectual Property Rights subordinate to the depart
ment led by the minister,
11. Date of receipt is the date of receipt of an application
already fulfilling administrative requirements.
12. Consultant of Intellectual Property Rights is somebody
having expertise in the field of intellectual propertyrights and specially providing services in the field of
submission and settlement of applications for patents,
marks, industrial designs as well as other fields of
intellectual property rights and being registered as a
consultant of intellectual property rights at the Direc
torate General.
13. License is a permit granted by a holder of a registered
mark to other parties through an agreement based on
the granting of rights (not the transfer of rights) to use
the mark wholly and partly for goods and/ or services
which are registered in a specified period and under
certain conditions.
14. Priority right is a right of an applicant to submit an
application originating in countries which join the Paris
Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property or
the Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organiza
tion to secure recognition that the date of receipt in
countries of origin constitutes the priority date in the
destination country which is also a member country of
the two agreements, as long as the submission is done
in the period already determined on the basis of the
Paris Convection for the Protection of Industrial Pro
perty,
15. Day is working day.
CHAPTER II
SCOPE OF MARK
Part One
General
Article 2
The mark as stipulated in this law covers trade
and service marks.
Article 3
Right to Mark is an exclusive right granted by the
country to the owner of a mark registered at the Mark
General List for a specified period to use the mark directly
or to permit other parties to use the mark.
Business News 6661-6662/12-9- 2001Part Two
8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e
2/18
10A
Part Two
Unregi5teredable and rejected mark
Article 4
A mark cannot be registered on the basis of an
application submitted by an applicant with the bad inten
tion.
Article 5
A mark cannot be registered if it contains any ofthe following elements:
a. contravening laws in force, religious morality, decency
or public order;
b. not having distinguishability
c. already becoming public property; or
d. being information on or being connected with goods
and/ or services whose registration is applied for.
Article 6
(1) The Directorate General must reject any application, if
the mark:
a. being the same principally or totally as a mark of
other parties, which has been registered first, in thecase of goods and/ or services of the same kind;
b. being the same principally or totally as a mark
already popularly belonging to other parties, in the
case of goods and/ or services of the same kind;
c. being the same principally or totally as a geographi
cal indication already known.
(2) The provision as meant in paragraph (10 letter b also
can be applied to goods and/ or services of other kinds
as long as they fulfill certain requirements which will
be further stipulated by a government regulation.
(3) The Directorate General also must reject any applica
tion if the mark:
a. being or having resemblance to names of popularfigures, photos or names of statutory bodies owned
by other parties, unless otherwise based on the writ
ten approval of the rightful party;
b. being imitation or having resemblance to names or
acronyms of names, flags, signs or symbols or
emblems of countries or national and international
institutions, unless otherwise based on the written
approval of the authorized party;
c. being imitation or having resemblance to signs or
seals or official stamps used by countries or govern
ment institutions, unless otherwise based on the
written approval of the authorized party.
CHAPTER III
APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF MARK
Part One
Requirements and Procedures for Application
Article 7
(1) Every application is submitted in writing in the Indone
sian language to the Directorate General by mention
ing:
a. month, date, year;
b. full name, citizenship and address of the applicant;
c. full name, and address of proxy, in the case of the
application being submitted through a proxy;
d. colors, if the mark whose registration is applied for
uses color elements;
e. name of country and date of the first request for
mark, in the case of the mark being submitted with
a priority right.
(2) Every application must be signed by the applicant or
his/her proxy.
(3) The applicant as meant in paragraph (2) can consist of
one person or several persons collectively, or a statu
tory body.
(4) The application is accompanied by payment receipt of
costs.
(5) If an application is submitted by more than one person
collectively that have right to the said mark, all names
of the applicants are mentioned by choosing one of the
addresses as their address.
(6) If the application as meant in paragraph (5) , the said
application is signed by one of the applicants entitled
to the mark by attaching the written approval of the
representing applicants.
(7) In the case of the application as meant in paragraph
(5) being submitted through their proxy, the power of
attorney is signed by all parties entitled to the said
mark.
(8) The proxy as meant in paragraph (7) is a consultant of
inte'hctual property rights.
(9) Provisions on requirements for the appointment of a
consultant of intellectual property rights are regulated
by a government regulation, while procedures for the
appointment of the consultant are regulated by a presi
dential decree.
Article 8
(1) Applications for 2 (two) classes of goods or more and/
or services can be submitted in one application.
(2) The application as meant in paragraph (1) must men
tion kinds of goods and/ or services subsumed in classes
whose registration is applied for.
(3) Classes of the goods and/ or services as meant in para
graph (1) are further regulated by a government regu
lation.
Article 9
Provisions on requirements and procedures for the
application are further stipulated by a government regulation.
Article 10
(1) Every application submitted by applicants living or domi
ciled permanently outside the territory of the Republic
of Indonesia must be submitted through their proxies
in Indonesia.
(2) The applicants as meant in paragraph (1) must declare
and chose domiciles of proxies as their legal domiciles
in Indonesia.
Business News 6661-6662/ 12-9-2001 Part Two
8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e
3/18
11A
Part Two
Application for Registration of Mark with Priority Right
Article 11
Every application using a priority right must be
submitted not later than 6 (six) months, starting from the
date of receipt of application for the registration of mark
received for the first time in other country, which constitutes a member country of the Paris Convention for the
Protection of Industrial Property or the Agreement Estab
lishing the World Trade Organization.
Article 12
(1) Besides fulfilling the obligations as meant in Part One
of this Chapter, every application using a priority right
must be accompanied by evidence of receipt of appli
cation for the first time, which results in the priority
right.
(2) The evidence of the priority right as meant in para
graph (1) is translated into the Indonesian language.
(3) In the case of the provisions as meant in paragraphs
(1) and (3) being not fulfilled in a period not later than
3 (three) months after the expiration of a right to sub
mit application by using the priority right as meant in
Article 11, the application continues to be processed,
but it uses no priority right.
Part Three
Examination of Completeness of Application for
Registration of Mark
Article 13
(1) The Directorate General examines the completeness of
the requirements for registration of mark as meant in
Articles 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12.
(2) In the case of shortcomings being found in the com
pleteness of the requirements as meant in paragraph
(1), the Directorate Genera! asks for completing the
requirements not later than 2 (two) months as from
the date of dispatch of the request for completing the
requirements.
(3) In the case of the shortcomings dealing with the require
ments as meant in Article 12, the deadline of comple
tion of the requirements is 3 (three) months at the
maximum, starting from the date of expiration of the
period of submission of application using a priority right.
Article 14
(1) In the case of the requirements being not completed inthe period as meant in Article 13 paragraph (2), the
Directorate General notifies the applicant or his/ her
proxy in writing that the application is considered ha
ving withdrawn.
(2) Should the application be considered having withdrawn
as meant in paragraph (1), all costs already paid to the
Directorate General cannot be taken off.
Part Four
Time of receipt of application for registration of mark
Article 15
(1) In the case of the whole administrative requirements
as meant in Articles 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 being
already fulfilled, the application is given the date of
receipt.
(2)The date of receipt as meant in paragraph (1) is
recorded by the Directorate General.
Part Five
Change in and withdrawal of application forregistration of mark
Article 16
Every application is only allowed co change in name
and/ or address of the applicant or his/her proxy.
Article 17
(1) As long as a decision does net yet obtain from the
Directorate General, applicants or their proxies can with
draw their applications.
(2) In the case of the withdrawal as meant in paragraph
(1) being done by a proxy, it must be done on the basis
of special power of attorney for the need of the with
drawal.
(3) In the case of an application being withdrawn, all costs
already paid to the Directorate General cannot be taken
off.
CHAPTER IV
REGI STRATION OF MARK
Part One
Substantive Examination
Article 18
(1) Not later than 30 ( thirty) days as from the date of
receipt as meant in Article 15, the Directorate General
examines the application substantively.
(2) The substantive examination as meant in paragraph (1)
is done on the basis of the provisions as meant in
Articles 4, S and 6.
(3) The substantive examination as meant in paragraph (1)
is completed not later than 9 (nine) months.
Article 19
(1) The substantive examination is executed by an auditor
at the Directorate General.
(2) Th e auditor is an official who is appointed as and
relieved of a functional official by the Minister on the
basis of certain requirements and qualifications because
of his/her expertise.
(3) The auditor is given a functional career path andallowance, besides other rights in accordance with laws
in force.
Article 20
(1) In the case of an auditor report ing results of the
substantive examination that an application can be
approved for registration, based on the approval of the
Director General, the application is announced in Mark
Gazette.
(2) In the case of an auditor reporting results of the
substantive examination that an application cannot be
registered or is rejected, based on the approval of the
Business News 6661-6662/ 12-9-2001 Director
8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e
4/18
12A
Director General, the rejection is notified in writing to
the relevant applicant or his/ her proxy by mentioning
reasons for the rejection.
(3) Not later 30 (thirty) days as from the date of receipt of
the application as meant in paragraph (2), the appli
cant or his/ her proxy can raise objection or response
by mentioning reasons.
(4) In the case of the applicant or his/ her proxy not raising
the objection or response as meant in paragraph (3),
the Directorate General stipulates a decision on the
rejection of the said application.
(5) In the case of the applicant or his/ her proxy raising the
objection or response as meant in paragraph (3), and
the auditor reporting that the said response is accept
able, based on the approval of the Dir ecto rate
General, the application is announced in Mark Gazette.
(6) In the case of the applicant or his/ her proxy raising the
objection or response as meant in paragraph (3), and
the auditor reporting that the said response is un
acceptable, based on the approval of the Directorate
General, a decision on the rejection of the said appli
cation is stipulated.
(7) The decision on rejection as meant in paragraphs (4)
and (6) is notified in writing to the relevant applicant
or his/ her proxy by mentioning its reasons.
(8) In the case of an application being rejected, all costs
already paid to the Directorate General cannot be with
drawn.
Part Two
Announcement of Application
Article 21
Not later than 10 (ten) days as from the date of
approval of an application for registration, the Directorate
General announces the application in Mark Gazette.
Article 22
(1) The announcement lasts for 3 (three) months and is
executed by:
a. placing it in Mark Gazette issued periodically by the
Directorate General; and/ or
b. placing it in special means easy and clear for public
view which is provided by the Directorate General.
(2) The Directorate General records the date of commence
ment of announcement of an application in Mark
Gazette.
Article 23
The announcement is done by mentioning:
a. full name and address of the applicant, including proxy
in the case of the application being submitted through
a proxy;
b. class and kind of goods and/ or services whose mark is
requested for registration;
c. date of receipt;
d. name of the country and date of receipt of an applica
tion for the first time, in the case of the application
being submitted by using a priority right; and
e. specimen of mark, including information on color and
in the case of etiquette of mark using foreign language
and/ or letters other than Latin letters and/ or figures
not common in the Indonesian language, along with its
translation into the Indonesian language, Latin letters
or figures common in the Indonesian language, as well
as its pronunciation in Latin spelling.
Part Three
Objection and Rebuttal
Article 24
(1) During the announcement period as meant in Article
22, every party can raise objection in writing for the
said application to the Directorate General with a cost
being charged.
(2) The obj ection as meant in paragraph (1) can be sub
mitted if there is sufficient reasons and proof that the
mark whose registration is applied for is an
unregisteredable and rejected mark on the basis of laws.
(3) In the case of the objection as meant in paragraph (1)
being existent, the Directorate General sends a copy ofletter containing the objection to the relevant appli
cant or his/ her proxy not later than 14 (fourteen) days
as from the date of receipt of the objection.
Article 25
(1) The applicant or his/ her proxy is entitled to deliver a
rebuttal of the objection as meant in Article 24 to the
Directorate General.
(2) The rebuttal as meant in paragraph (1) is submitted in
writing not later than 2 (two) months as from the date
of receipt of the copy of objection conveyed by the
Directorate General.
Part Four
Reexamination
Article 26
(1) In the case of any obj ection and/ or rebuttal , the
Directorate General uses the objection and/ or rebuttal
as consideration material in the reexamination of the
application already announced as meant in Article 21.
(2) The reexamination of the application as meant in para
graph (1) is completed not later than 2 (two) months
as from the date of expiration of the announcement
period.
(3) The Directorate General notifies in writing the result of
the reexamination as meat in paragraphs (1) and (2)
to the party raising the objection.
(4) In the case of the auditor reporting results of the
reexamination that the objection is acceptable, the
Directorate General notifies the applicant in writing that
the application cannot be registered or is rejected, and
in such case, the applicant or his/ her proxy can
appeal.
(5) In the case of the auditor reporting results of the
reexamination that the objection is unacceptable, based
on the approval of the Director General, the applica
tion is declared approved for registration in Mark
Gazette.
Business News 6661-6662/12-9- 2001 Article 27
8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e
5/18
13A
Article 27
(1) In the case of the objection as meant in Article 24 being
not existent, the Directorate General issues and grants
a mark certificate to the applicant or his/her proxy not
later than 30 (thirty) days as from the date of expira
tion of the announcement period.
(2) In the case of the objection as meant in Article 26 para
graph (5) being unacceptable, the Directorate Genera!
issues and grants a mark certificate to the applicant or
his/ her proxy not later than 30 (thirty) days as from
the date of approval of the application for registration
in Mark Gazette.
(3) The mark certificate as meant in paragraph (1) contains:
a. full name and address of the owner of the regis
tered mark;
b. full name and address of the proxy, in the case of
the application being submitted on the basis of the
provision in Article 10;
c. date of submission and date of receipt;
d. name of the country and date of receipt of the appli
cation for the first time, in the case of the applica
tion being submitted by using a priority right;
e. etiquette of the registered mark, including informa
tion on kinds of colors, in the case of the said mark
using mark elements and in the mark using foreign
language and/ or letters other than Latin letters and/
or figures not common in the Indonesian language,
along with its trans lation into the I ndonesian
language, Latin letters or figures common in the
Indonesian language, as well as its pronunciation in
Latin spelling;
f. number and date of registration;
g. the validity period of registration of mark.
(4) Every party can submit an application for obtainingofficial texts of certificates of marks registered in Mark
Gazette by paying a cost.
Part Five
Protection Period of Registered Mark
Article 28
Every registered mark secures legal protection for
a period of 10 (ten) years as from the date of receipt and
the protection period is extendible.
Part Six
Application for Appeal
Article 29
(1) An application for appeal can be filed against the
rejection of an application connected with reasons and
consideration bases on the substantive matters as
meant in Articles 4, 5 and 6.
(2) The application for appeal is submitted in writing by
the relevant applicant or his/her proxy to the Mark
Appeal Commission with a copy made available to the
Directorate General by paying a cost.
(3}The application for appeal is submitted by explaining
the objection completely as well as reasons for the
rejection of the application as a result of the substan
tive examination.
(4) The reasons as meant in paragraph (3} must not be
correction or improvement of the rejectee application.
Article 30
(1) Every application for appeal is submitted not later thar.
3 (three) months as from the date of notification of
rejection of the application.
(2) In the case of the period as meant in paragraph (1)
already elapsing without the application for appeal, the
application is considered accepting the rejection of the
application.
(3) In the case of the application being already considered
acceptable as meant in paragraph (2), the Directorate
Genera! records and announces the rejec: :on.
Article 31
(1) The Mark Appeal Commission makes a decision not later
than 3 (three) months as from the date of receipt of ar
app'ication for appeal.
(2) In the case of the Mark Appeal Commission ruling in
favor of the application for appeal, the Directorate
General executes the announcement as meant in
Article 21, except the application already announced in
Mark Gazette.
(3) In the case of the Mark Appeal Commission rejecting
the application for appeal, the applicant or his/ her proxy
can file a lawsuit against the decision on the rejection
of the application for appeal to the Court of Commerce
not later than 3 (three) months as from the date of
receipt of the decision on the rej ection.
(4) Only appeal for the Supreme Court can be filed against
the decision of the Court of Commerce as meant in
paragraph (3).
Article 32
Procedures for the application, examination and
settlement of appeal are further stipulated by a presiden
tial decree.
Part Seven
Mark Appeal Commission
Article 33
(1) The Mark Appeal Commission is a special agency which
is independent and belongs to the department in charge
of intellectual property rights.
(2) The Mark Appeal Commission consists of a chairman
concurrently member, vice chairman concurrently member and members composed of several experts in
needed fields, as well as senior auditors.
(3) The members of the Mark Appeal Commission as meant
in paragraph (I) are appointed and relieved by the Min
ister for the tenure of 3 (three) years.
(4) The chairman and vice chairman are elected from and
by members of the Mark Appeal Commission.
(5) In order to examine an application for appeal, the Mark
Appeal Commission establishes a council with the num
ber of members being odd, at least 3 (three) persons,
and out of them, one is senior auditor not examining
the application substantively.
Business News 6651-6662/ 12-9-2001 Article 34
8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e
6/18
14A
Article 34
The organizational structure, tasks and functions
of the Appeal Mark Commission are further stipulated by a
government regulation.
Part Eight
Extension of Protection Period of Registered Mark
Article 35( 1) Every owner of mark can submit an application for the
extension for the same period any time.
(2) The application for the extension as meant in para
graph (1) is submitted in writing by the owner of mark
or his/ her proxy not later than 12 (twelve) months
before the expiration of the protection period of the
registered mark.
(3) The application for the extension as meant in para
graph (2) is submitted to the Directorate General.
Article 36
An application for the extension is approved if:
the relevant mark is still used in the goods or servicesas meant in the said certificate of mark; and
b. the goods or services as meant in letter a are still pro
duced and traded.
Article 37
(1) The Directorate General rejects an application for the
extension if the said application fails to comply with
the provisions as meant in Articles 35 and 36.
(2) The Directorate General rejects an application for the
extension, if the said mark has resemblance principally
or totally to a popular mark belonging to other parties,
by observing the provisions as meant in Article 6 para
graph (1) letter b and paragraph (2).(3) The rejection of application for the extension is noti
fied in writing to the owner of the mark or his/her proxy
by mentioning reasons for the rejection,
(4) A rebuttal of rejection of application for the extension
as meant in paragraphs (1) and (2) can be filed to the
Court of Commerce.
'5)Only appeal for the Supreme Court can be filed against
the decision of the Court of Commerce as meant in
paragraph (3).
Article 38
(1) The extension of the protection period of a registered
mark is recorded in the Mark General List and announcedin Mark Gazette.
(2) The extension of the protection period of a registered
mark is notified in writing to the owner of the mark or
his/her proxy.
Part Nine
Change in Name and/or Address of
Owner of A Registered Mark
Article 39
(1) Every application for recording the change in name and/
or address of owner of a registered mark is submitted
Business News 6661-6662/12-9- 2001
to the Directorate General by paying a cost of record
ing in the Mark General List and accompanied a legiti
mate copy of evidence of the change.
(2) The change in name and/ or address of the owner of a
registered mark already recorded by the Directorate
General is announced in Mark Gazette.
CHAPTER VTHE TRANSFER OF RIGHT TO REG ISTE RED MARK
Part One
The transfer of right
Article 40
(1) The right to a registered mark can shift or be trans
ferred due to:
a. inheritance;
b. t .-stament;
c. grant;
d. agreement; or
e. other causes justified by laws.
(2) The transfer of right to the mark as meant in para
graph (1) must have its recording requested to theDirectorate General for being recorded in the Mark
General List.
(3) The application for the transfer of right to the mark as
meant in paragraph (1) is accompanied by supporting
documents.
(4) The transfer of right to the mark already recorded as
meant in paragraph (2) is announced in Mark Gazette.
(5) The transfer of right to a registered mark which is not
recorded in the Mark General List brings about no legal
consequence to the third party.
(6) The recording of transfer of right to the mark as meant
in paragraph (1) is subjected to the cost as stipulated
in this law.
Article 41
(1) The transfer of r ight to a registered mark can be
accompanied by the transfer of good name, reputation
or others connected with the mark.
(2) The right to a registered service mark inseparable from
the personal capability, quality and skill of the provider
of the relevant service can be transferred with the pro
vision that the guarantee for the quality of service pro
vided must be existent.
Article 42
The Directorate General only can records the trans
fer of right to a registered mark if it is accompanied by a
written statement of the recipient of the transfer that the
mark will be used for the trade of goods and/ or services.
Part Two
License
Article 43
( l) The owner of a registered mark has a right to give a
license to other parties by an agreement that the
licensee will use the mark for goods or services wholly
or partly.
f2^ The
8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e
7/18
15A
(2) The licensing agreement is effective throughout the
territory of the Republic of Indonesia, unless other
wise agreed, for a period not longer than the protec
tion period of the relevant registered mark.
(3) The licensing agreement must have its recording
requested to the Directorate General by paying a cost
and legal consequences of the recording of the licens
ing agreement apply to the relevant parties and thethird party.
(4) The Directorate General records the licensing agree
ment as meant in paragraph (3) in the Mark General
List and announces its Mark Gazette.
Article 44
The owner of a registered mark already granting
a license to the other party as meant in Article 43 para
graph (1) can continue to exercise directly or give a
license to the other third party to use the right, unless
otherwise agreed.
Article 45
The statement that the licensee can further give a
license to the third party can be stipulated.
Article 46
The use of the registered mark in Indonesia by
the licensee is considered the same as the use of the mark
in Indonesia by the owner of the mark.
Article 47
(1) A licensing agreement is prohibited from containing
provisions directly and indirectly capable of causing
harmful effects to the Indonesian economy or contain
ing limitations discouraging the capability of I ndonesian people in mastering and developing technology in
general.
(2) The Directorate General must reject every application
for the recording of licensing agreements containing
the prohibitions as meant in paragraph (1) .
(3) The Directorate General notifies in writing the rejec
tion along with its reasons as meant in paragraph (2)
to the owner of mark or his/ her proxy, and the
licensee.
Article 48
(1) In the case of a licensee having good intention, but the
mark is later revoked on the basis of the principal ortotal resemblance to other registered marks, the
licensee continues to have a right to implement the
licensing agreement up to the expiration of the period
of the licensing agreement.
(2) The licensee as meant in paragraph (1) is no longer
obliged to continue the payment of royalty to the
revoked licenser, but the licensee must pay royalty to
the owner of the mark which is not nullified.
(3) In the case of a licenser already receiving royalty in a
lump sump from a licensee previously, the said licenser
must give up the portion of royalty received to the owner
Business News 6661-6662/12-9-2001
of mark which is not nullified, with the amount being
equal to the remaining period of the licensing agree
ment.
Article 49
Requirements and procedures for the application
for recording a licensing agreement and provisions on the
licensing agreement as meant in this law are further stipu
lated by a presidential decree.
CHAPTER VI
COLLECTIVE MARK
Article 50
(1) Every application for the registration of trade or ser
vice marks as a collective mark can be accepted if the
application clearly certifies that the marks will be used
a collective mark.
(2) Besides the affirmation on the use of collective mark
as meant in paragraph (1), the application must be
accompanied by copies of provisions on the use of the
marks as a collective mark, which are signed by all
owners of the relevant marks.
(3) The provisions on the use of the collective mark as
meant in paragraph (1) at least contain:
a. nature, general characteristics or quality of goods
or services produced and traded;
b. regulation for owner s of the col lective mark to
supervise effectively the use of the mark; and
c. sanction against the violation of regulation on the
use of the collective mark.
(4) The provisions as meant in paragraph (3) are recorded
in the Mark General List and announced in Mark
Gazette.
Article 51
Every application for the registration of a collec
tive mark is subjected to the examination of completeness
of the requirements as meant in Articles 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
and 50.
Article 52
The substantive examination of an application for
a collective mark is done in accordance with the provi
sions in Articles 18, 19 and 20.
Article 53
(1) Any change in the provision on the use of a collective
mark must have its recording requested to the Direc
torate General by accompanying a legitimate copy of
evidence of the change.
(2) The change as meant in paragraph (1) is recorded in
the Mark General List and announced in Mark Gazette.
(3) The change in the provision on the use of a collective
mark is effective for the third party after being recorded
in the Mark General List.
Article 54
( l) The right to a collective mark only can be transferred
to a
8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e
8/18
8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e
9/18
17A
b. the mark is used for goods and/ or services not suit
able to goods and/ or services whose registration is
applied for, including the use of a mark not suitable
to the registered mark.
(3) The reasons as meant in paragraph (2) letter a are due
to:
a. import prohibition;
b. prohibition connected with a license to distribute
goods which use the relevant mark or a provisional
decision from the authorized party;
c. other similar prohibition stipulated by a government
regulation.
(4) The erasing of registration of the mark as meant in
paragraph (2) is recorded in the Mark General List and
announced in Mark Gazette.
(5) Any objection against the decision on the erasing of
registration of a mark as meant in paragraph (2) can
be submitted to the Court of Commerce.
Article 62
'.) Every application for erasing the registration of a mark
of goods and/ or services partly or wholly by the owner
of the mark is submitted to the Directorate General.
(2) In the case of the mark as meant in paragraph (1) being
still committed to a licensing agreement, the erasing
only can be done if the matter is approved in writing by
the licensee.
(3) The exception from the approval as meant in paragraph
(1) is only possible if in the licensing agreement, the
licensee firmly agrees to put aside the agreement.
(4) The erasing of registration of the mark as meant in
paragraph (1) is recorded in the Mark General List and
announced in Mark Gazette.
Article 63
The erasing of registration of a mark on the basis
of the reasons as meant in Article 61 letters a and b also
can be submitted by the third party in the form of a litiga
tion to the Court of Commerce.
Article 64
(1) Only appeal to the Supreme Court can be filed against
the decision of the Court of Commerce as meant in
Article 63.
(2) The content of the decision of the judicial institution as
meant in paragraph (1) is promptly conveyed by the
secretary of the relevant court to the DirectorateGeneral after the date when the decision is made.
(3) The Directorate General erases the relevant mark from
the Mark General List and announces it in Mark Gazette
if the decision of the judicial institution as meant in
paragraph (1) has been accepted and had permanent
legal power.
Article 65
( l) The Directorate General erases the registration of a
mark by delisting the relevant mark from the Mark
General List and putting a note about the reason for
and date of the erasing.
(2) The erasing of the registration as meant in paragraph
(1) is notified in writing to the owner of the mark or
his/ her proxy by mentioning the reason for the erasing
and affirming that certificate of the relevant mark is
declared ineffective anymore as from the date of
delisting from the Mark General List.
(3) The erasing of registration of a mark causes the termi
nation of legal protection of the relevant mark.
Article 66
(1) The Directorate General can erase the registration of a
collective mark on the basis of:
a. the application of the owner of a collective mark
with the written approval of all users of the collec
tive mark;
b. sufficient evidence that the collective mark is not
used for 3 (three) years consecutively as from the
date of registration or the last use, unless there are
reasons acceptable by the Directorate General.
c. sufficient evidence that the collective mark is used
for goods or services not suitable to the goods or
services whose application is requested for;
d. sufficient evidence that the collective mark is not
used in accordance with the regulation on the use of
a collective mark.
(2) The application for erasing the registration of a collec
tive mark as meant in paragraph (1) letter a is submit
ted to the Directorate General.
(3) The erasing of registration of the collective mark as
meant in paragraph (2) is registered in the Mark
General List and announced in Mark Gazette.
Article 67
The erasing of registration of a collective mark
also can be filed by the third party in the form of a lawsuit
to the Court of Commerce on the basis of the reasons as
meant in Article 66 paragraph (1) letter b, c or d.
Part Two
Annulment
Article 68
(1) A lawsuit for nullifying the registration of a mark can
be filed by the interesting party on the basis of the
reason as meant in Article 4, 5 or 6.
(2) Owners of unregistered marks can filed the lawsuit as
meant in paragraph (1) after submitting applications
to the Directorate General.
(3) The lawsuit for the annulment as meant in paragraph
(1) is submitted to the Court of Commerce.
(4) In the case of the plaintiff and defendant being domi
ciled outside the territory of the Republic of Indonesia,
the lawsuit can be submitted to the Court of Commerce
in J akarta.
Article 69
(1) A lawsuit fcr nullifying a mark only can be submitted in
a period of 5 (five) years as from the date of registra
tion of the mark.
Business News 6661-6662/ 12-9- 2001 (21 A lawswit
8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e
10/18
18A
(2) A lawsuit for nullifying can be submitted without dead
line, if the mark contravenes religious morality, decency
or public order.
Article 70
(1) Only appeal to the Supreme Court can be field against
a verdict of the Court of Commerce deciding a lawsuit
for nullifying.
(2) The content of the verdict of the judicial institution as
meant in paragraph (1) is promptly conveyed by the
relevant secretary of the court to the Directorate
General after the date when the decision is made.
(3) The Directorate General nullifies the registration of the
relevant mark at the Mark General List and announces
it in Mark Gazette after the decision of the judicial
institution as meant in paragraph (1) is received and
has permanent legal power.
Article 71
\ )The Directorate General nullifies the registration of a
mark by delisting the mark from the Mark General List
and putting a note about the reasons and the date of
annullment.
(2) The annullment of the registration as meant in para
graph (1) is notified in writing to the owner of the mark
or his/ her proxy by mentioning reasons for the
annullment and affirming that certificate of the relevant
mark is declared ineffective anymore as from the date
of delisting from the Mark General List.
(3) The delisting of registration of a mark from the Mark
General List as meant in paragraph (1) is announced in
Mark Gazette.
(4) The annullment and delisting of registration of a markcauses the termination of legal protection for the
relevant mark.
Article 72
In addition to the reason for the annullment as
meant in Article 68 paragraph (1), the annullment of a
^gistered collective mark also can be requested to the
_ ourt of the Commerce if the use of the collective mark
contravenes the provision as meant in Article 50 paragraph
CD-
CHAPTER IX
ADMINI STRATI ON OF MARK
Article 73
The administration of mark as stipulated in.this
law is executed by the Directorate General.
Article 74
The Directorate General operates a national mark
information and documentation network system capable
of providing information on mark to the public.
CHAPTER X
C O S T
Article 75
( l)The submission of every application or application for
the extension of mark, application for obtaining a copy
of the Mark General List, the recording of transfer of
right, the change in name and/ or address of a holder
of a registered mark, the recording of a licensing agree-
meiit, objection against an application, application for
appeal as well as others determined in this law is sub
jected to a cost whose amount is stipulated by a
government regulation.
(2) Further provisions on the requirements, period and
procedures for the payment as meant in paragraph (1)
are stipulated by a presidential decree.
(3) The Directorate General, based on the approval of the
Minister and the Minister of Finance, can use revenue
coming from the cost as meant in paragraphs (1) and
(2) on the basis of laws in force.
CHAPTER XI
SETTLEMENT OF DI SPUTE
Part One
Lawsuit Against Mark Violation
Article 76
(1) The owner of a registered mark can file a lawsuit against
every party that without right uses a mark having
resemblance principally or totally for goods or services
of the same kind in the form of:
a. lawsuit for compensation; and/ or
b. termination of all activities connected with the use
c»" the said mark.
(2) The lawsuit as meant in paragraph (1) is submitted to
the Court of Commerce.
Article 77The lawsuit against the mark violation as meant
in Article 76 can be submitted by a licensee of a registered
mark individually and together with the owner of the
relevant mark.
Article 78
{l )When the examination is underway and in order to pre
vent the occurrence of a bigger loss, based on a
request of the holder of a mark or licensee as a plain
tiff, the law can order the defendant to stop producing,
distributing and/ or trading goods or services using the
mark without right.
(2) In the case of the defendant being also demanded togive up goods which use the mark without right, the
judge can order that the delivery of goods or value of
the good is done after the decision of the court has
permanent legal power.
Article 79
Only appeal to the Supreme Court can be filed
against the decision of the Court of Commerce.
Part Two ( To be continued )
Business News 6661-6662/ 12-9-2001
8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e
11/18
16A
M A R K
(Law No. 15/ 2001 dated Aug ust 1,2001)
/ Con t in ued f r om Bu si nes s New s No. 6661 - 6662 pages 9A - ISA J
Part Two
Procedure for litigating in the Court of Commerce
Article 80(1) A lawsuit for nullifying the registration of a mark is
submitted to the Chairman of the Court of Commerce
in jurisdiction of address or domicile of the defendant.
(2) In the case of the defendant being domiciled outside
the territory of Indonesia, the lawsuit is submitted to
the Chairman of Central Jakarta Court of Commerce.
(3) The secretary of the court registers the lawsuit for the
annullment on the date of submission of the relevant
lawsuit and gives a written evidence of receipt signed
by the secretary to the plaintiff with the same date as
the date of registration of the lawsuit.
(4) The secretary conveys the lawsuit for the annullment
to the Chairman of the Court of Commerce not later
than 2 (two) days as from the date of registration of
the lawsuit.
(5) Not later than 3 (three) days as from the date of
registration of the lawsuit for the annullment, the Court
of Commerce studies the lawsuit and stipulates the
date of legal proceedings.
(6) The legal proceedings for the lawsuit for the annul
ment are executed not later than 60 (sixty) days after
the registration of the lawsuit.
(7) The bailiff summons parties not later than 7 (seven)
days after the registration of the lawsuit for the
annullment.
(8) A decision on the lawsuit for the annulment must be
read out not later than 90 (ninety) days after the reg
istration of the lawsuit and the period can be extended
to another term of 30 (thirty) days at the maximum
on the basis of the approval of the Chairman of the
Supreme Court.
(9) The decision on the lawsuit for the annulment as meant
in paragraph (8) which completely contains legal con
siderations being the basis for the said decision must
be read out in legal proceedings open for the public
and can be executed first, even though a legal action
is filed against the decision.
(10) The bailiff must convey content of the decision of the
Court of Commerce as meant in paragraph (9) to par
ties not later than 14 (fourten) days after the decision
on the lawsuit for the annullment is read out.
Article 81
The procedure for litigating as regulated in Article
80 is effective mutatis mutandis for the lawsuit as stipu
lated in Article 76.
Part Three
Appeal to the Supreme Court
Article 82
Only appeal can be filed against the decision of
the Court of Commerce as meant in Article 80 paragraph
(8).
Article 83
(1) Every application for the appeal as meant in Article 82
must be submitted not later than 14 (fourteen) days
after the date of the decision against which appeal is
requested is read out or notified to parties by means
of registering it to the secretary of the court already
deciding the lawsuit.
(2) The secretary of the court registers the appeal for the
Supreme Court on the date of submission of the re
levant application and a written receipt signed by the
secretary of the court with the date being the same as
that of receipt of registration is given to the applicant
of the appeal.
(3) The applicant of appeal to the Supreme Court must
have conveyed an appeal memory to the secretary of
the court in 7 (seven) days as from the date of regis
tration of the application for the appeal as meant in
paragraph (1).
(4) The secretary of the court is obliged to send the
application for the appeal and the appeal memory as
meant in paragraph (3) to the defendant in the
appeal not later than 2 (two) days after the date of
registration of the appeal.
(5) The defendant can file contra-appeal memory to the
secretary of the court not later than 7 (seven) days
after the date of receipt the appeal memory as meant
in paragraph (4) by the relevant defendant and the
secretary of the court is obliged to convey the contra-appeal memory to the applicant of the appeal not later
than 2 (two) days after the secretary of the court re
ceives the contra-appeal memory.
(6) The secretary of the court is obliged to documents of
the relevant appeal to the Supreme Court not later
than 7 (seven) days after the period as meant in para
graph (5) elapses.
(7) The Supreme Court must study the documents of the
appeal as meant in paragraph (6) and stipulate the
date of legal proceedings not later than 2 (two) days
after the application for the appeal is received by the
Supreme Court.
(8) Legal proceedings for examining the application for
the appeai must be done not later than 60 (sixty) days
after the date of receipt of the application by the
Supreme Court.
(9) A decision on the application for the appeal must be
read out not later than 90 (ninety) days as from the
date of receipt of the application by the Supreme Court.
(10) The decision on the application for the appeal as meant
in paragraph (9) completely containing legal conside
rations which become the basis for the said decision
must be read out in legal proceedings open for the
public.
Business News 6664-6665/19-9-2001 flPT he
8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e
12/18
17A
(11) The secretary of the Supreme Court is obliged to con
vey the content of the decision on the appeal to the
secretary of the court not later than 3 (three) days
after the decision on the application for the appeal is
read out.
(12) Bailiff must convey the content of the decision on theappeal as meant in paragraph (I ) to the plaintiff and
defendant of the appeal not later than 2 (two) days
after the decision is received.
Part Four
Alternative for Settlement of Dispute
Article 64
In addition to the settlement of the lawsuit as
meant in Part One of this Chapter, parties can settle dis
putes through arbitration or alternative for the settlement
of disputes.
CHAPTER XII
PROVIS IONAL STIPULATION OF THE COURT
Article 85
Based on sufficient evidence, every party whose
right is inflicted can ask the judges of the Court of Com
merce to issue a provisional stipulation on:
a. the prevention of goods connected with the violation
against mark rights from coming in.
b. the storage of evidence connected with violation against
the rights.
Article 86
(1) Every application for the provisional stipulation is sub
mitted in writing to the Court of Commerce with the
requirements as follow:
a. attaching evidence of right ownership;
b. attaching evidence of strong initial indications of vio
lation against mark;
c. clear information on goods and/or documents asked,
sought, gathered and collected for proving;
d. having fears that parties allegedly violating mark will
be able easily to make the evidence disappear;
e. paying guarantee in form of cash money or bank
guarantee.
(2) In the case of the provisional stipulation as meant inArticle 85 being already executed, the Court of Com
merce promptly notifies parties subjected to actions
and open opportunity for the parties to have their
information heard.
Article 67
In the case of the judge of the Court of Com
merce already issuing a provisional stipulation, the judge
of the Court of Commerce examining the dispute must
decide to amend, revoke or fortify the stipulation as meant
in Article 85 not later than 30 (thirty) days as from the
date of issuance of the stipulation.
Article 88
If the provisional stipulation is:
a. fo r t i f i ed , the g u a r a n t e e money a l r eady pa id mus t be
r e t u r n e d to the app l i can t of th e s t i pu la t i on and the sair.
app l i can t can f i le t he l a w s u i t as m e a n t in Article 76;
b . r e v o k e d , t h e g u a r a n t e e m o n e y a l r e a d > p a i d m u s 'p rom pt l y g i ven up to the pa r ty sub j ec ted to th e ac t ion
as a compensation for the provisional stipulation.
CHAPTER XIII
INVESTIGATION
Article 89
(1) In addition to the investigators of the Indonesian Po
lice Force, certain civil servant officials at the Direc
torate General are given special authority to act as the
investigators as meant in Law No. 8/1981 on Civil Code,
to investigate crimes in the mark field.
(2) The civil servant investigators as meant in paragraph
(1) are authorized to:
a. examine the truth of lawsuits connected crimes in
the mark field;
b. investigate persons or statutory bodies allegedly
committing crimes in the mark, field on the basis of
the lawsuits as meant in letter a;
c. ask information and evidence from persons or statu
tory bodies in connection with crimes in the mark
field;
d. audit the bookkeeping, records and other documents
connected with crimes in the mark field;
e. undertake examination in certain places allegedl>
containing evidence, bookkeeping, records and other
documents as well as confiscating materials anc
products of the violation which can be used as evi
dence in a criminal case in the mark field; and
f. ask assistance from experts in the framework of
execution of tasks of investigation into crimes in the
mark field;
(3) The civil servant investigators as meant in paragraph
(1) notify the commencement of investigation anc
results of their investigation to investigators of the
Indonesian Police Force.
(4) The civil servant investigators as meant in paragrapl
(1) convey results of their investigation to Public Pro
secutors through investigators of the Indonesian Polict
Force by observing the provision in Article 10 of Lav
No. 8/1981 on Criminal Code.
CHAPTER XIV
CRIMINAL PROVISION
Article 90
Whoever intentionally and unrightfully uses a marl
totally the same as a registered mark belonging to th.
other party for goods and/ or services of the same kirn
which are produced and/ or traded is sentenced to impris
onment of 5 (five) years at the maximum and/or a fine c
Rp 1,000,000,000.00 (one billion rupiah) at the maximum
Business News 6664-6665/ 19-9- 2001 Article 91
8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e
13/18
ISA
Article 91
Whoever intentionally and unrightfully uses a mark
principally the same as a registered mark belonging to the
other party for goods and/ or services of the same kind
which are produced and/ or traded is sentenced to impri
sonment of 4 (five) years at the maximum and/ or a fine of
Rp 800,000,000.00 (eight hundred million) at the maxi
mum.
Article 92
(1) Whoever intentionally and unrightfully uses a mark
totally the same as a geographical indication belong
ing to the other party for goods and/ or services of the
same kind which are produced and/ or traded is sen
tenced to imprisonment of 5 (five) years at the maxi
mum and/or a fine of Rp 1,000,000,000.00 (one billion
rupiah) at the maximum.
(2) Whoever intentionally and unrightfully uses a mark
principal ly the same as a geographical indication
belonging to the other party for goods and/ or services
of the same kind which are produced and/ or traded is
sentenced to imprisonment.of 4 (five) years at the
maximum and/ or a fine of Rp 800,000,000.00 (eight
hundred million) at the maximum.
(3) The provisions as meant in paragraphs (1) and (2) are
applied to the attachment of actual origin to products
resulting from a violation or the attachment of words
showing that the said products constitute imitation of
a registered and protected mark on the basis of geo
graphical indications.
Article 93Whoever intentionally and unrightfully uses a pro
tected mark on the basis of indications of origin in goods
or services thus having capable of deceiving or misleading
the public about the origin of the goods or services is sen
tenced to imprisonment of 4 (four) years at the maximum
and/ or Rp 800,000,000.00 (eight hundred million) at the
laximum.
Article 94
(1) Whoever trading goods and/ or services ascertained or
noteworthy to ascertain that the said goods and/ or ser
vices result from the violations as meant in Articles 90,
91 and 93 is sentenced to imprisonment of one year atthe maximum and/ cr a fine of Rp 200,CC ? #000.00 (two
hundred million) at the maximum.
(2) Thc crime as meant in paragraph (1) is a violation.
Article 95
The crimes as meant in Articles 90, 91, 92, 93
and 94 constitute actions liable to litigate.
CHAPTER XV
TRANSI TI ONAL PROVISION
Article 96
(1) Every applicat ion for the extension of protection
period of a registered mark, the recording of transfer
of a right, the recording of change in name and/ or
address, request for delisting or annulment of regis
tration of a mark submitted on the basis of Law No.
19/ 1992 as already amended by Law No. 14/ 1997 on
mark but the application is not yet completed upon
the date of enforcement of this law is settled on thebasis of the provisions in the said law.
(2) All marks already registered on the basis of Law No.
19/ 1992 as meant in Law No. 14/ 199-7 on mark and
still valid upon the promulgat ion of this law are
declared to remain valid according to this law for the
remainder of their respective registration periods.
Article 97
Lawsuits for the annulment of the marks as meant
in Article 96 paragraph (2) can continue to be submitted
to the Court of Commerce as meant in Article 68, on the
basis of the reasons as meant in Articles 4, 5 and 6.
Article 98
Disputes over marks which are still processed in
the court upon the enforcement of this law continue to be
processed on the basis of Law No. 19/ 1992 as already
amended by Law No. 14/ 1997 on mark until they obtain
decisions having permanent legal power.
Article 99
All technical directives made on the basis of Law
No. 19/1992 as already amended by Law No. 14/1997 on
mark which have existed upon the enforcement of this law
are declared to remain effective as long as they do not
contravene this law or are not yet replaced by new regula
tions on the basis of this law.
CHAPTER XVI
CONCLUSION
Article 100
With the enforcement of this law, Law No. 19/
1992 as already amended by Law No. 14/ 1997 on mark is
declared null and void.
Article 101
This law comes into force as from the date of pro
mulgation.
For public cognizance", this law shall be promul
gated by placing it in Statute Book of the Republic of
Indonesia.
Ratified in Jakarta
On August 1,2001
THE PRESI DENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF I NDONESIA
sgd
MEGAWATI SOEKARNOPUTRI
Business News 6664-6665/19-9-2001 Promulgated
8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e
14/18
19A
Promulgated in J akarta
On August 1,2001
THE SECRETARY OF STATE
sgd
MUHAMMAD M. BASYUNI
STATUTE BOOK OF
THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESI A OF 2001 NO. 110
ELUCIDATION
O N
LAW NO. 15/2001
CONCERNING
M A R K
I. GENERAL
The widespread globalization in both social, eco
nomic, cultural and other life sectors is a development
which is actual and seizes thorough attention in the last
decade as well as a trend which stifl continues in the future. Developments of technology, information and trans
portation have caused trading activities to grow rapidly
and even positioned the world as the collective sole mar
ket.
The global trade era only can be maintained if a
climate of fair business competition is existent. In this case,
marks play a very important role, requiring a more
adequate regulation system. Based on the said develop
ments and in line with international agreements already
ratified by Indonesia as well as experiences from execut
ing the mark administration, the mark law, namely Law
No. 19/1992 (Statute Book of 1992 No. 81) as already
amended by Law No. 14/ 1997 (Statute Book of 1997 No.
37) hereinafter called the o ld mark law needs to be
improved by a new mark law.
Compared to the old mark law, contrast differ
ences in this law deal with, among others, the settlement
of an application. Pursuant to this law, substantive exami
nation is executed after the applications fulfill administra
tive requirements. Previously, the substantive examination
is executed after the completion of announcement of marks.
The amendment is intended to enable parties faster to
ascertain whether the application is accepted or rejected,
and open opportunity for other parties to raise objections
against applications already approved for registration.
Under the new law, the announcement period is 3 (three)
months, shorter than that in the old law. As a result of the
cutting of the announcement period, the settlement pe
riod of an application will be shorter totally in the frame
work of enhancing service for the public.
In connection with a priority right, this law stipu
lates that in the case of an application failing to meet evi
dence of receipt of an application resulting in the priority
right for the first time in 3 (three) months after the expi
ration of the priority right, the said application will be
treated as an ordinary application without the priority right.
Another matter deals with the rejection of an
application being the loss of an application. For that pur
pose, it needs regulation capable of helping the applicant
to ascertain reasons for the rejection of his/ her applica
tion more clearly by first notifying the applicant that the
application will be turned down.
In addition to the protection of trade and service
marks, this law also regulates the protection of a geographical indication, namely a sign showing the region of
origin of a product because of geographical factors, in
cluding natural or human factor or combination thereof,
giving certain characteristics and quality to the produc
tion. Moreover, it also regulates an indication of origin.
Subsequently, in the view of the fact that a mark
constitutes part of economic/ business activities, the settle
ment of a dispute over a mark needs a special j udicial
institution, namely the Court of Commerce so that the dis
pute over the mark can be settled in a relatively fast
period. In relation thereto, special law must also regu
lated to settle disputes over mark, including intellectual
property rights. The special court for the settlement ofdisputes over mark and intellectual property rights is also
known in other countries, such as Thailand. In this law,
the owner of a mark is also given iegal protection efforts,
such as prov is ional st ipulat ion to prevent his/ her mark from
suffering a bigger loss. In addition, this also contain pro
visions on arbitration and alternative for the settlement of
disputes to provide wider opportunity in the settlement of
the disputes.
This law results in the regulation on mark in a
single text so as to better facilitate the public to use it. In
this case, provisions in the old law whose substances are
not changed, are contained again in this law.
II. ARTICLE BY ARTICLE
Articles 1 and 1
Sufficiently clear
Article 3
Unless otherwise stipulated firmly, what is meant
by parties in this article and subsequent articles in this law
is someone , severa l persons co l l ect i ve l y or s ta tu to ry
bod ies .
Article 4
An applicant having good intention is an applica
tion registering his/her mark properly and honestly without having any intention to get ride on, copy or crib the
popularity of a mark belonging another party in the inter
est of his/ her business that inflicts a loss on the other
party or causes unfair business competition, carelessness
or misleading to consumers. For example, trade mark A
already known generally by the public for years is cribbed
in such a way so as to have resemblance to the trade mark
A principally or totally. Since the imitator has committed
the bad intention in the example, elen.ents of his/ her
intention in copying the already known traJ e mark at least
are noteworthy to ascertain.
Business News 6664-6665/19-9-2001 Article 5
8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e
15/18
20A
Article 5
Letter a
The use of a mark capable of hurting the feeling,
polite behavior, orderliness and religiosity of public or cer
tain groups of the society is included into the definition
contravening religious morality, decency or public order.
Letter b
A mark is considered not having distinguishability
if the mark is too simple, such as being line mark or spot
mark, or too complicated so as to be unclear.
Letter c
An example of the mark is the mark of skull above
two crossing bones, which have been publicly known as
the danger mark. Such a mark is a mark being general in
the nature and already belonging to the public property.
In relation thereto, the sign cannot be used as a mark.
Letter d
The mark connects with or only mentions goods
or services whose registration is requested, e.g. mark of
coffee or coffee picture for coffee or coffee products.
.rticle 6
Paragraph (1)
Letter a
What is meant by s imi la r i ty in pr inc ip le is the
resemblance caused by significant elements between a
mark and other mark, which can result in the impression
of similarity in both form, placement method, writing way
or combination of elements and similarity of pronuncia
tion contained in the mark.
Letter b
The rejection of an application having similarity
principally and wholly to a popular mark for goods and/ or
services of the same kind is done by observing the public
knowledge about the mark in the relevant business field.
In addition, reputation of the popular mark acquired due
to intensive and massive promotion, investments in coun
tries which are executed by the owner and accompanied
by evidence of registration of the mark in countries also
needs to be observed. In the case of the above mentioned
matters being considered not sufficient yet, the Court of
Tommerce can instruct an independent institution to carry
out a survey for making a conclusion whether the mark
becoming the basis for the rejection is popular or not.
Letter c
Sufficiently clear
Paragraph (2)
Sufficiently clear
Paragraph (3)
Letter a
Name o f s ta tu to r y body means the name of the
statutory body used as a mark and registered at the Mark
General List.
Letter b
Nat iona l ins t i tu t i ons includes mass organizations
and social political organizations.
Letter c
Sufficiently clear
Article 7
Sufficiently clear
Article S
Paragraph (1)
In principle, an application can be submitter "ror
m ora than one class of goods and/ or services in accor
dance w i th provisions of Trade Mark Treaty already rati
fied by Presidential Decree No. 17/ 1997.
It a i m s at facilitating the mark owner planning to
use his/her mark for several goods and/ or services of seve
ral classes which are not necessary to get occupied by
administrative procedures requiring the separate regula
tion on an application for every class of the goods and/ or
services.
Paragraphs (2) and (3)
Sufficiently clear
Article 9
Sufficiently clear
Article 10
Paragraph (1)
This provision also applies to applications using a
priority right.
Paragraph (2)
Sufficiently clear
Article 11
This provision aims at accommodating the state
interest being a member of the Paris Convention for the
Protection of Industrial Property 1883 (as already amended
several times) or the Agreement Establishing the World
Trade Organization.
Article 12
Paragraph (1)
The evidence of a priority right is in the form of
application for registration along evidence of receipt of
the application also providing affirmation on the date of
receipt of the application. If what is conveyed is in the
form of copy or photocopy of the receipt, the endorse
ment of the copy or photocopy of the receipt is granted by
the Directorate General in the case of the application is
submitted for the first time.
Paragraph (2)
Translation is done by a sworn in translator.
Paragraph (3)
Sufficiently clear
Article 13
Paragraph (1)
Sufficiently clear
Paragraph (2)
Date o f d ispa tch means the date of dispatch on
the basis of postal stamp.
Paragraph (3)
Sufficiently clear
Business News 6664-6665/19-9-2001 Article 14
8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e
16/18
8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e
17/18
22A
Paragraph (4)
Sufficiently clear -
Paragraph (5)
The stipulation that the legal consequences are
just effective after the transfer of right to the mark is
recorded in the Mark Genera! List is intended to facilitate
supervision and realize legal certainty.
Article 41
Paragraph (L)
Sufficiently clear
Paragraph (2)
The transfer of right to a service mark in this para
graph can only be done if there is a guarantee from both
the mark owner or mark licensee or recipient of license, to
maintain the quality of service traded.
For the purpose, it needs a special guideline for
mulated by the mark owner ( licenser or party transferring
the mark) on methods of or procedures for providing ser
vices attached by the mark.
.rticle 42 up to article 45
Sufficiently clear
Article 46
In the case of the owner of a registered mark not
using his/her mark directly in the trade of goods or ser
vices in Indonesia, the use of the mark by a licensee is the
same as the use by the owner of the registered mark. It
connects with possibilities of delisting of registration of
marks which are not used in the trade of goods or services
for 3 (three) months consecutively as meant in Article 61
paragraph (2) letter a.
Article 47 up to article 49
Sufficiently clear
Article 50
Paragraphs (1) and (2)
Sufficiently clear
aragraph (3)
Provisions on, amongst others, nature, general
characteristics and quality of goods or services as well as
their supervision contain a definition that there are
requirements which must be fulfilled by parties taking part
in using the collective mark.
Paragraph (4)
Sufficiently clear
Article 51 up to article 55
Sufficiently clear
Article 56
• Paragraph (1)
A geographical indication is an indication or iden
tity of a product originating on a certain place, region or
territory that shows the quality, reputation and character
istics, including natural and human factors used as an
attribute of the product. Marks which can be used as a
geographical condition can take the form of etiquette or
label attached to the production. The marks can be in the
form of name of place, region or territory, word, picture,
letter or combination of the elements. The name of place
can originate from a name mentioned in the geographical
map or name known as the name of place of origin of thesaid product due to the continuous use. The protection of
geographical indication covers natural resources, agricul
tural products, handicraft; or certain industrial products.
Paragraph (2)
Ins t i tu t i ons represen t ing comm un i t i es in reg ions
produc ing goods are institutions authorized to register
geographical indications and the institutions constitute
government institutions or other official institutions, such
as cooperatives, associations and others.
Paragraph (3) up to paragraph (9)
Sufficiently clear
Article 57 up to article 60Sufficiently clear
Article 61
Paragraph (1)
Sufficiently clear
Paragraph (2)
Letter a
The latest use means the use of the mark for goods
or services which are traded. The moment of the latest
use is calculated from the date of the latest use even though
the goods are still distributing in communities.
Letter b
The unsuitability in the use covers the unsuitabil-
ity in the form of writing of word or letter or the unsuit
ability in the use of different color.
Paragraph (3) up to paragraph (5)
Sufficiently clear
Article 62 up to article 67
Sufficiently clear
Article 68
Paragraph (1)
Interesting parties means, amongst others, pro
secutor, consumer advocacy foundations/institutions and
religious councils/ institutions.
Paragraph (2) up to paragraph (4)
Sufficiently clear
Article 69
Paragraph (1)
Sufficiently clear
Paragraph (2)-
The definition con t raven ing re l i g ious mo ra l i t y ,
decency or publ ic order is the same as that as contained
in elucidation on Article 5 letter a. Also included into the
definition contravening public order is bad intention.
Business News 6664-6665/19-9-2001 Article 70
8/15/2019 UU 15 2001 - UU Merek - English - Trademark Law2001_15e
18/18
23A
Article 70 up to article 74
Sufficiently clear
Article 75
Paragraphs (1) and (2)
Sufficiently clear
Paragraph (3)
This law stipulates provisions on possibilities of
the use of part of non-tax state revenue (PNBP) by the
Directorate General, which comes from all costs connected
with mark.
To use t he revenue means the use of PNBP on the
basis of systems and mechanisms in force. In this case,
the whole revenue is remitted directly to the state trea
sury office as PNBP. Later, the Directorate General through
the Minister submits an application to the Minister of
Finance for using part of PNBP in accordance with the need
permitted by law, which is now regulated in Law No. 20/
1997 on Non-Tax State Revenue (Statute Book of 1997
No. 43).
Article 76 up to article 79
Sufficiently clear
Article 80
Paragraph (1)
Chairman of the Court of Commerce means the
Chairman of the Court of Commerce in place where the
Court of Commerce is located.
Paragraph (2)
Sufficiently clear
Paragraph (3)
Unless otherwise stipulated, the secretary of the
court as meant in this law is the secretary of the Court of
Commerce.
Paragraph (4) up to paragraph (6)
Sufficiently clear
Paragraph (7)
Bailiff means a bailiff at the State Court/ Court of
Commerce.
Paragraph (8) up to paragraph (10)
Sufficiently clear
Articles 81 and 82
Sufficiently clear
Article 83
Paragraph (1) up to paragraph (5)
Sufficiently clear
Paragraph (6)
Documents of appeal means application for
appeal, appeal memory, and/ or contra-appeal memory as
well as other documents.
Paragraph (7) up to paragraph (12)
Sufficiently clear
Article 84
Sufficiently clear
Article 85
Letter a
This provision is intended to prevent the party
whose right is violated from suffering a bigger loss so that
the Court of Commerce is authorized to issue a provisional
stipulation for preventing the continuous violation and
goods allegedly violating right to a mark from coming into
trading lanes, including the importation.
Legal action of appeal or appeal to the Supreme
Court cannot filed against the provisional stipulation.
Letter b
The provision aims at preventing violators from
causing the evidence to despair.
Article 86
Paragraph (1)
Letter a
Evidence o f ma rk owne rsh ip means a certificate
of mark. In the case of the applicant of stipulation being a
licensee, the evidence can be in the form of letter of
recording of licensing agreement.
Letter b
Sufficiently clear
Letter c
The information is in the form of details of kinds
of goods or kinds of serv ices suspec ted as products
resulting from the violation against mark.
Letter d
Sufficiently clear
Letter e
The amount of guarantee is equal to the value of
goods or the value of services subj ected to the provisional
stipulation.
Paragraph (2)
Sufficiently clear
Article 87
Sufficiently clear
Article 88
Letter a
Sufficiently clear
Letter b
In the case of the guarantee money being in the
form of bank guarantee, the judge instructs for cashing
out the guarantee into cash money.
Articles 89 up to article 101
Sufficiently clear
SUPPLEMENT TO STATUTE BOOK OF
THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NO. 4131
Business News 6664-6665/19-9-2001