IPCC WG1 AR5: Key Findings Relevant to Future Air Quality

Post on 12-Jan-2016

23 views 1 download

Tags:

description

IPCC WG1 AR5: Key Findings Relevant to Future Air Quality. Fiona M. O’Connor, Atmospheric Composition & Climate Team, Met Office Hadley Centre. IPCC AR5 WG1 Report. WG1 Summary for Policy Makers released 27 Sept 2013 WG1 Full Report published 30 Sept 2013 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

transcript

IPCC WG1 AR5: Key Findings Relevant to Future Air QualityFiona M. O’Connor, Atmospheric Composition & Climate Team, Met Office Hadley Centre

IPCC AR5 WG1 Report

• WG1 Summary for Policy Makers released 27 Sept 2013

• WG1 Full Report published 30 Sept 2013

• WG1 provides the latest assessment of the physical science with respect to climate change

• Observed changes are unprecedented and have been seen throughout the climate system

• It is now possible to link observed changes in many climate components to human influence

• Climate models have been improved, and can reproduce main features of observed multi-decadal warming

• WG2 and WG3 on impacts and mitigation to be released in 2014

Outline of Presentation

• Observed Changes in the Climate

• What’s Causing these Changes?

• Future Projections of Climate Change

• Future Projections of Air Quality

• Main Conclusions and Key Uncertainties

Part 1: Observed changes to the climate

Atmospheric CO2 levels are unprecedented for 800,000 yrs

Atmospheric CO2 concentrations have

• increased by about 40% since 1750, due to human activity

• exceed values recorded in ice cores for the last 800,000 years

2000s: warmest decade on record

• Last 3 decades warmest in instrumental record.

• From palaeoclimate records, in the NH, last 30 years likely (66-100%) the warmest period of the past 1400 years.

• Very likely (90-100%) that number of warm days has increased and cold nights decreased globally

Almost the whole globe is warming

Most global land areas analysed have experienced significant warming including of both maximum and minimum temperature extremes since 1950

Despite robust multi-decadal warming since 1901, there is substantial decadal variability in the rate of warming with several periods exhibiting almost no linear trend.

Annual mean temperature (1901-2012)

Part 2: What are the causes of the changing climate?

Changes to Earth’s Energy Budget

The AR5 estimate for 2011 is 44% greater than the AR4 estimate for 2005 because of:

• Increased forcing from greenhouse gases

• Revised estimate of aerosol forcing

Attribution of Radiative Forcing to Emissions

Radiative Forcing from Aerosols

Time Evolution and Spatial Heterogeneity in RF

Part 3: Future projections

Scenarios for future change

• AR4: Special Report on Emission Scenarios (SRES) are four major families of GHG emission scenarios each making different assumptions for future greenhouse gas pollution, land-use and other driving forces

• AR5: Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) are four GHG concentration trajectories, each describing a different future value of radiative forcing in 2100. RCPs aim to provide a range of climate model responses, rather than being derived from socio-economic storylines.

Projections of global average warming

• By the end of the century, the increase of global mean surface temperature above 1986-2005 levels is projected to be:

• 0.3-1.7˚C for RCP2.6

• 2.6-4.8˚C for RCP8.5

• Global warming >2˚C is likely (66-100%) for RCP6.0 and RCP8.5• Global warming >4˚C is unlikely (0-33%) except for RCP8.5

Warming will not be the same everywhere

• There is very high confidence that long-term warming will be larger over land than over the ocean, and that the Arctic region will warm most rapidly.

• Ocean warming will continue for centuries, even if greenhouse gas emissions are decreased.

There will be large geographical variations in precipitation change

• For the next few decades, changes in regional-scale precipitation will be strongly influenced by natural variability.

• Contrast between wet and dry regions and seasons will increase over most of the globe, though there are regional exceptions.

• Monsoon precipitation is likely to intensify, along with a lengthening of the monsoon season.

Projections of temperature over Europe

Figure 11.18Rajczak et al. (2013)

2016–2035 vs 1986–2005 ensemble mean results from the ENSEMBLES project

Part 4: Future Projections of Air Quality (O3 and PM2.5)

AQ Statements in Summary for Policy Makers

• Range in projections of near-term AQ (surface O3 and PM2.5) is driven primarily by emissions rather than by climate change

• Globally, warming decreases background surface O3 but high CH4 (RCP8.5) can offset this decrease

• Higher surface temperatures in polluted regions will trigger feedbacks in local chemistry and emissions, increasing peak levels of O3 and PM2.5

• For PM2.5,climate change may alter natural aerosol sources and wet removal, but no confidence level is attached to the overall impact

Future Anthropogenic Emissions

SRES vs

RCPs

Figure 8.2 AR5

Changes in Trop. O3 Burden

AtmosphericComposition and Climate ModelIntercomparisonProject (ACCMIP)

Young et al., ACP, 2013

Changes in Near-Term Surface O3

Figure 11.21 (adapted from Fiore et al., 2012)

Global and Regional Changes in Surface O3

Figure 11.23a

Time seriesof O3

Changes in OH/Reactivity

Results from ACCMIP time slice experiments

Voulgarakis et al., ACP, 2013.

Changes in Aerosol Optical Depth relative to Yr- 2000

2030 2100

RCP2.6 -14% -26%

RCP4.5 -4% -18%

RCP6.0 -12% -23%

RCP8.5 -4% -14%

Table AII.5.3

Changes in Surface PM2.5

Figure 11.23b

Time seriesof PM2.5

Extreme Weather and AQ

• Extreme AP episodes are associated with changing weather patterns, such as heat waves and stagnation episodes

• Climate change has increased the near-term risk of heat waves

• Projected changes in the frequency of regional air stagnation events remain difficult to assess -> regional AP extremes

• Projections show increases in extreme O3 pollution events over US/Europe but lack of agreement at regional level

Longer-Term Feedbacks on Natural CH4 Emissions

Figure 6.36O’Connor et al., 2010

Summary on AQ

• Lower background AP levels are projected following the RCPs compared to SRES (high confidence)

• Range in near-term projections of AQ is driven primarily by emissions rather than by climate change (medium confidence)

• The total range in emissions — including the CLE and MFR scenarios—is larger than spanned by the RCPs

• Peak O3 and PM2.5 will increase with climate change

Key Gaps and Uncertainties

• Uncertainties in Future Anthropogenic Emissions• Uncertainties in BVOC chemistry• Impact of climate change on BVOC emissions• Impact of climate change on natural CH4 emissions• Impact of climate change on transport pathways• Future Projections of Stagnation Events• Future Projections of Regional AQ• Future Projections of Regional OH• Recent and Future Trends in surface O3

Questions and answers