Cses Bibliography

7/27/2019 Cses Bibliography

1/37

CSES Full Bibliography (601 listings)

he listings are arranged in alphabetical order by the author's last name. Selecting the first

etter of an author's last name will go to the section containing the listing.

A B C D E F G H I J K L M

N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

arts, K. Determining the Pattern of Party Evaluations: Proximity and Directional Models ofdeology. in CSES Conference and Planning Committee Meeting. 2006. Seville, Spain.

arts, K. and B. Aardal, Patterns of Party Evaluations, in How Democracy Works: PoliticalRepresentation and Policy Congruence in Modern Societies : Essays in Honour of Jacques

homassen, M. Rosema, B. Denters, and K. Aarts, Editors. 2011, Pallas Publications -

msterdam University Press: Amsterdam. p. 159-179.

arts, K. and J. Thomassen, Satisfaction with Democracy: Do Institutions Matter? . Electoraltudies, 2008. 27(1): p. 5-18.

arts, K. and J.J.A. Thomassen. Electoral Institutions and Satisfaction With Democracy. innternational Conference on Elections and Democratic Governance, Institute of Political

cience, Academia Sinica (IPSAS). 2005. Taipei, Taiwan.

berg, M. and M. Sandberg, Social Capital and Democratisation: Roots of Trust in Post-ommunist Poland and Ukraine. 2003, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

chen, C.H., Two-Step Hierarchical Estimation: Beyond Regression Analysis. Political Analysis,005. 13(4): p. 447-456.

lber, J. and U. Kohler, Die Ungleichheit der Wahlbeteiligung in Europa und den USA und dieolitische Integrationskraft des Sozialstaats. Leviathan, 2007. 35(4): p. 510-539.

lber, J. and U. Kohler, The Inequality of Electoral Participation in Europe and America and theolitically Integrative Functions of the Welfare State. 2008, WZB Discussion Paper: Berlin. p.6.

lberro, I.N., Do the Poor Go to the Voting Booths? A Reevaluation of the SocioeconomicModel of Turnout in Established and Emerging Democracies, in Political Science. 2007,

orthwestern University: Evanston, Illinois. p. 143.

lbright, J. Party Discipline, Voter Heterogeneity, and the Notion of Representation: Thetrange Case of Spain. in 64th Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.006. Chicago.

lbright, J., Election Campaigns and Voter Realignments, in Political Science. 2008, Indiananiversity: Bloomington, Indiana. p. 249.

lbright, J.J., Does Political Knowledge Erode Party Attachments?: A Review of the CognitiveMobilization Thesis Electoral Studies, 2009. 28(2): p. 248-260.
http://www.cses.org/


2/37

lbritton, R. and T. Bureekul. Democracy: A Comparison of the 2001 and 2005 Parliamentarylections in Thailand. in 20th World Congress of the International Political Science Association.006. Fukuoka, Japan.

ldrich, J. and S. Popa. Clarity of Party Positions on Ideology: A Cross-National Analysis. inSES Conference: Political Institutions - Rationality - Electoral Behavior. 2008. Warsaw,oland.

lvarez, R.M. and G. Katz, Structural Cleavages, Electoral Competition and Partisan Divide: A

ayesian Multinomial Probit Analysis of Chile's 2005 Election. Electoral Studies, 2009. 28(2): p.77-189.

nderson, C.D. Economic Voting and Multi-level Governance: An Individual-level Analysis . in7th Annual Conference of the Canadian Political Science Association. 2004. Winnipeg,anada.

nderson, C.D., Economic Voting and Multi-level Governance: A Comparative Individual-Levelnalysis. American Journal of Political Science, 2006. 50(2): p. 449-463.

nderson, C.J. and P. Beramendi. Income Inequality and Turnout Inequality in Advancedndustrial Democracies. in 101st Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.005. Washington, D.C.

nderson, C.J., et al., eds. Losers Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. 2007,Oxford University Press: Oxford. 240.

renas Gmez, J.C. and J.C.E. Escobar, Las elecciones de octubre en Medelln: candidaturas,emas y resultados. Estudios Polticos, 2000. 17: p. 91-118.

rian, A. and M. Shamir, Context and Comparison in Election Research: The Israel Nationallection Study, in Election Studies: What's Their Use?, E. Katz and Y. Warshel, Editors. 2001,

Westview Press: Boulder, CO. p. 127-148.

rnold, J.R. Individual and Contextual Effects on Political Knowledge. in 103rd Annual Meetingf the American Political Science Association. 2007. Chicago.

rnold, J.R., Contextualizing Political Knowledge: A Cross-National, Multilevel Approach. 2007.

rnold, J.R., Public Ignorance and the Quality of Democracy, in Political Science. 2008,niversity of Minnesota: Minneapolis. p. 164.

descu, G., Cultural Heritage and Romanian Civil Society, in Pathways to Democraticommunity H.-D. Klingemann, et al., Editors. 2004, Oxford University Press: Oxford. p. 22.

descu, G. and P. Sum. Political Choice in an Unstructured Party System: The Importance of

he Left-Right Schema in Post-Communist Europe . in 18th World Congress of the Internationalolitical Science Association. 2000. Qubec City, Canada.

descu, G. and P. Sum. Mapping Political Preferences: The Emergence of Citizen Left-RightOrientations in New Democracies. in CSES Plenary Session. 2005. Washington D.C.

descu, G. and P. Sum. The Importance of Left-Right Orientations in the New Democracies.n International conference on "Elections and Democratic Governance", Institute ofolitical Science, Academia Sinica (IPSAS). 2005. Taipei, Taiwan.

descu, G. and P. Sum, Ideological Voting: A Cross-national Analysis of Left-RightOrientations on Voting Behavior. Studia Politica, 2008. 53(1): p. 52-73.


3/37

aek, M., Political Communication Systems and Voter Participation, in Government. 2009,niversity of Texas at Austin: Austin. p. 162.

ajarunieni, R.e.a., The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems: Final Report of the 1995-96lanning Committee, in The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, H.-D. Klingemann, Editor.009, Oxford University Press: Oxford.

aldini, G. and A. Pappalardo, eds. Elections, Electoral Systems and Volatile Voters. 2008,algrave Macmillan: New York, NY.

aldwin, K. and J.D. Huber, Economic versus cultural differences: Forms of ethnic diversity andublic goods provision. American Political Science Review, 2010. 104(104): p. 18.

anducci, S.A. and J.A. Karp, Gender, Leadership and Choice in Multiparty Systems. PoliticalResearch Quarterly, 2000. 53(4): p. 815-848.

anducci, S.A. and J.A. Karp, The 2002 Election in Comparative Context , in Voters' Veto. Thehe 2002 Election in New Zealand and the Consolidation of Minority Government, J. Vowles,ditor. 2004, Auckland University Press: Auckland, NZ. p. 150-166.

anducci, S.A. and J.A. Karp, Electoral Systems, Efficacy, and Voter Turnout, in Theomparative Study of Electoral Systems, H.-D. Klingemann, Editor. 2009, Oxford University

ress: Oxford. p. 109-134.argsted, M.A. and O. Kedar. Voting for Coalitions: Strategic Voting under Proportional

Representation. in 65th Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. 2007.hicago, IL.

argsted, M.A. and O. Kedar, Coalition-Targeted Duvergerian Voting: How Expectations Affectoter Choice under Proportional Representation. American Journal of Political Science, 2009.3(2): p. 307-323.

artle, J. and P. Belluci, eds. Political Parties and Partisanship: Social identity and individualttitudes. Routledge/ECPR Studies in European Political Science. Vol. 57. 2009, Routledge.

ean, C., How Well Does the Political System Represent the Public Interest? A Comparison ofoter Perceptions in Australia and New Zealand, inAustralasian Political Science Associationnnual Conference. 2008: Brisbane. p. 27.

ean, C.S. How Well Does the Political System Represent the Public Interest? A Comparisonf Voter Perceptions in Australia and New Zealand. inAustralian Political Studies Association008 Conference. 2008. Brisbane, Australia.

eard, V.P. Democratic Behaviors in Emerging African Democracies: The Role of Gender andReligion. in 64th Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. 2006. Chicago.

langer, .,Antipartyism and Third-Party Vote Choice. A Comparison of Canada, Britain andustralia. Comparative Political Studies, 2004. 37(9): p. 1054-1078.

eltrn, U. Do Economic Differences or Institutions Explain Variance in the Economic Votemong Countries? in International conference on "Elections and Democratic

Governance", Institute of Political Science, Academia Sinica (IPSAS). 2005. Taipei,aiwan.

eltrn, U. Contextual Effects on the Individual Rationality: Economic Conditions and Vote. in4th Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. 2006. Chicago, IL.


4/37

eltrn, U., Institutional Contexts and Individual Decisions: Fourth National CIDE-CSESurvey. Politica y Gobierno, 2007. 14(2): p. 467-490.

eltrn, U. Efectos contextuales sobre la racionalidad individual: Condiciones Econmicas yoto retrospectivo. in Primer Congreso Latinoamericano de Opinin Pblica. 2007. Colonia delacramento, Uruguay.

eltrn, U. Contextual Effects on the Individual Rationality: Economic Conditions, Institutionalrrangements and Retrospective Vote. in CSES Conference: Political Institutions - Rationality -lectoral Behavior. 2008. Warsaw School of Social Psychology, Warsaw Poland.

engtsson, . Prerequisites for Accountability and Political Efficacy . in International Conferencen "Elections and Democratic Governance", Institute of Political Science, Academia

inica (IPSAS). 2005. Taipei, Taiwan.

engtsson, . Inclusiveness or Accountability: What brings about the most Responsiveystem? in Workshop no. 15 "Democracy, accountability and political behaviour",ordic Political Science Association. 2005. Reykjavik, Iceland.

engtsson, . Prerequisites for Accountability and External Efficacy. in 1st Karlstad Seminar ontudying Political Action. 2005. Karlstad University, Sweden.

ernauer, J., N. Giger, and J. Rosset, The Substantial Representation of Subconstituencynterests in European Democracies, in 17th International Conference of the Council foruropean Studies. 2010. p. 36.

ernhagen, P. Information, Organization and Structural Power: Estimating Business Influencever Environmental Policy in 22 OECD Countries. in 101st Annual Meeting of the Americanolitical Science Association. 2005. Washington, DC.

ernhagen, P. The Political Power of Business: Environmental Regime Stringency andnformation Asymmetry in Thirty-one Capitalist Democracies. in 63rd Annual Meeting of the

Midwest Political Science Association. 2005. Chicago.

ernhagen, P. Political Power and International Environmental Agreements: Business Influencever Participation and Compliance. in 47th Annual Convention of the International Studiesssociation. 2006. San Diego.

ernhagen, P., The Political Power of Business: Structure and Information in Publicolicymaking. 2007, Abingdon/New York: Routledge

ernhagen, P., Political Power and International Environmental Agreements: Businessnfluence over Participation and Compliance. Global Environmental Politics, 2008. 8(1): p. 78-10.

ernhagen, P. and M. Marsh. Citizen Participation: Voting and Beyond. in "Democracy inhe New Europe" conference of the Institute d'Etudes Politiques de Paris . 2003. Dijon,rance.

ernhagen, P. and M. Marsh. Turnout Matters: Sometimes. in Uppsala 2004 ECPR Jointessions of Workshops. 2004. Uppsala, Sweden.

ernhagen, P. and M. Marsh. Turnout Matters: Sometimes. in International conference onquot;Elections and Democratic Governance", Institute of Political Science, Academia

inica (IPSAS). 2004. Taipei, Taiwan.

ernhagen, P. and M. Marsh, Voting and Protesting: Explaining Citizen Participation in Old and


5/37

ew European Democracies. Democratization, 2007. 14(1): p. 44-72.

ernhagen, P. and M. Marsh, The Partisan Effects of Low Turnout: Analyzing Vote Abstentions a Missing Data Problem. Electoral Studies, 2007. 26(3): p. 548-560.

ernhagen, P. and M. Marsh, Missing Voters, Missing Data: Using Multiple Imputation tostimate the Effects of Low Turnout. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 2010.0(4): p. 447-472.

est, R.E., I. Budge, and M. McDonald, Representation as a median mandate: Taking cross-ational differences seriously. European Journal of Political Research, Forthcoming 2011.

est, S.J. and B. Radcliff, eds. Polling America: an Encyclopedia of Public Opinion . Vol. 1.005, Greenwood Press: Westport, CT.

irch, S. Explaining Confidence in the Conduct of Elections. in 2009 Annual Conference of thelections, Public Opinion and Parties Group of the Political Studies Association. 2005.niversity of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom.

irch, S. Perceptions of Electoral Fairness and Voter Turnout . in 101st Annual Meeting of themerican Political Science Association. 2005. Washington, DC.

irch, S., Electoral Systems and Electoral Misconduct. Comparative Political Studies, 2007.0(12): p. 1533-1556.

irch, S. Compulsory Electoral Participation and Political Legitimacy. in 103rd Annual meetingf the American Political Science Association. 2007. Chicago, IL.

irch, S., Electoral Management Bodies and the Electoral Integrity: Evidence from Easternurope and the Former Soviet Union, in Electoral Malpractice and Electoral Manipulation inew and Semi-Democracies. 2008. p. 20.

irch, S., Electoral Institutions and Popular Confidence in Electoral Processes: A Cross-

ational Analysis. Electoral Studies, 2008. 27(2): p. 305-320.irch, S. Electoral System Design and Electoral Malpractice. in 5th General Conference of theuropean Consortium for Political Research 2009. Potsdam, Germany.

irch, S., Electoral Corruption, in The Sage Handbook of Comparative Politics, T. Landmannd N. Robinson, Editors. 2009, Sage Publications: London. p. 395-409.

irch, S., Full Participation: a Comparative Study of Compulsory Voting. 2009, New York:nited Nations University Press.

irch, S., Perceptions of Electoral Fairness and Voter Turnout. Comparative Political Studies,010. 43(12): p. 1601-1622.

irnir, J.K., Divergence in Diversity? The Dissimilar Effects of Cleavages on Electoral Politics inew Democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 2007. 51(3): p. 602-19.

lais, A., Who Votes?, in To Vote or Not to Vote: The Merits and Limits of Rational Choiceheory, A. Blais, Editor. 2000, University of Pitsburgh Press: Pittsburgh.

lais, A. How Do Losers Assess Electoral Democracy? in 61st Annual Meeting of the Midwestolitical Science Association. 2003. Chicago.

lais, A. and M.A. Bodet, Does Proportional Representation Foster closer Congruence betweenitizens and Policy Makers? Comparative Political Studies, 2006. 39(10): p. 1243-1262.


6/37

lais, A., et al., Measuring Party Identification: Britain, Canada and the United States. Politicalehavior, 2001. 23(1): p. 18.

lais, A. and P. Loewen. Electoral Systems and Evaluations of Democracy. in 102nd AnnualMeeting of the American Political Science Association. 2006. Philadelphia.

lais, A. and P. Loewen, Electoral Systems and Evaluations of Democracy, in Democratic

Reform in New Brunswick, W. Cross, Editor. 2007, Canadian Scholars' Press: Toronto, Ontario.. 39-57.

org, S. and H. Paloheimo. Research and Data on Finnish Elections: An Overview . in CSESlenary Session. 2003. Stockholm, Sweden.

ovens, M. and A. Wille. Diploma Democracy: The Disappearance of the Less Educated fromolitical Life. in 4th General Conference of the European Consortium for Political Research.007. Pisa, Italy.

owler, S. and T. Donovan. Public Attitudes About Changing Political Institutions. in Politicalconomy Conference. 2000. Washington University.

rader, T. Of Time and Partisan Stability Revisited: The Post-Communist Puzzle . in 67thnnual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. 2009. Chicago.

rader, T.A. and J.A. Tucker. Do Party Cues Affect Policy Opinions in New Party Systems?urvey Experiments in Three Post-Communist Countries. in 104th Annual Meeting of themerican Political Science Association. 2008. Boston.

rader, T.A. and J.A. Tucker, Follow the Leader: Party Cues, Policy Opinion, and the Power ofartisanship in Three Multiparty Systems. 2010: Oxford. p. 55.

rader, T.A., J.A. Tucker, and A. Therriault, Thr Cross-Pressured Citizen. Revisiting Socialnfluence on Voting Behavior. 2010.

rady, H.E., Contributions of Survey Research to Political Science. PS: Political Science &olitics, 2000. 33(1): p. 47-57.

rockington, D. Constricted Policy Space and Political Participation: Evidence from 34emocracies. in 99th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. 2003.hiladelphia.

rockington, D. Familiarity Breeds Contentment: Contextual and Individual Determinants ofemocratic Satisfaction in 34 Democracies. in 61st Annual Meeting of the Midwest Politicalcience Association. 2003. Chicago.

rockington, D., The Paradox of Proportional Representation: The Effect of Party Systems and

oalitions on Individuals' Electoral Participation. Political Studies, 2004. 52(3): p. 469-490.rockington, D., It's about the Benefits: Choice Environments, Ideological Proximity and

ndividual Participation in 28 Democracies. Party Politics, 2009. 15(4): p. 435-454.

rockington, D. and J. Karp. Social Desirability and Response Validity: A Comparative Analysisf Over-Reporting Turnout in Five Countries. in 98th Annual Meeting of the American Politicalcience Association. 2002. Boston.

alvo, E. and T. Hellwig, Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives under Different Electoral


7/37

ystems. American Journal of Political Science, 2010. 55(1): p. 27-41.

ampante, F.R. and D. Chor, Schooling and Political Participation and the Economy. 2010,arvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.

aramani, D., ed. Comparative Politics. 2008, Oxford University Press: New York.

arlin, R. and G. Love. Policy Salience, Strategic Mobilization, and Voter Turnout. in 65thnnual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. 2007. Chicago.

astillo, A.M.J. Institutional Performance and Satisfaction with Democracy. A Comparativenalysis. in CSES Conference and Planning Commmittee Meeting. 2006. Seville, Spain.

hen, T.-h., Uncovering the micro-foundations of turnout and electoral systems. Electoraltudies, 2011. 30(2): p. 295-308.

hoi, E. and J. Woo, Political corruption, economic performance, and electoral outcomes: aross-national analysis. Contemporary Politics, 2010. 16(3): p. 249-262.

hu, Y.-h. and M.-h. Huang, Partisanship and Citizen Politics in East Asia. Journal of Eastsian Studies, 2007. 7(2): p. 295-321.

hu, Y.-h., M.-h. Huang, and Y.-t. Chang. Identifying Sources of Democratic Legitimacy instablished and Emerging Democracies. in International conference on "Elections andemocratic Governance", Institute of Political Science, Academia Sinica (IPSAS). 2005. Taipei,aiwan.

laibourn, M. and V. Sapiro. Gender Differences in Citizen-Level Democratic Citizenship:vidence from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. in 59th Annual Meeting of the

Midwest Political Science Association. 2001. Chicago.

larke, H., et al. Political Choice in Britain: The 2005 BES. in CSES Plenary Session. 2005.Washington, DC.

lausen, L. Party Democratization and Citizens: The Impact of Candidate Selection Rules on

oters. in 79th Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association . 2008. NewOrleans.

olton, T.J. Babes in Partyland: The Riddle of Partisanship in Post-Soviet Russia . in 2000World Democratization Conference on Rethinking Democracy in the New Millennium. 2000.

niversity of Houston, Houston.

olton, T.J., Parties, Citizens, and the Prospects for Democratic Consolidation in Russia , infter the Collapse of Communism: Comparative Lessons of Transition, M. MacFaul and K.toner-Weiss, Editors. 2004, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. p. 173-206.

ooper, A.L., Nonminating Presidential Candidates: The Primary Season Compared to Twolternatives. Political Research Quarterly, 2001. 54(4): p. 771-793.

row, D. and E. Berumen. Who Really votes? Rethinking the effects of sociodemographiconditions on voting in Mexico in light of turnout overestimation. in 103rd Annual meeting of themerican Political Science Association. 2007. Chigago.

row, D.B., Citizen Disenchantment in New Democracies: The Case of Mexico, in Government.009, University of Texas at Austin: Austin. p. 228.

urtice, J., The Future of Election Studies: Mid-Life Crisis of New Youth? , in CREST Workingaper No. 78. 2000, CREST: Centre for Research into Elections and Social Trends:


8/37

ondon/Oxford.

urtice, J., The State of Election Studies: Mid-Life Crisis or New youth? Electoral Studies,002. 21(2): p. 161-168.

urtice, J. Elections as Beauty Contests: Do the rules matter? in International Conference onPortugal at the Polls'. 2003. Lisbon, Portugal.

urtice, J. and A. Blais, Follow my Leader? A Cross-National Analysis of Leadership Effects inarliamentary Democracies, in CREST Working Paper 91. 2001, Centre for Research into

lections and Social Trends.

urtice, J., S. Fisher, and S. Smith, The Globalisation of Public Opinion Research, in CrestWorking Paper 109. 2005, CREST.

urtice, J. and H. Sarinder, The Impact of Leadership evaluations on voting behaviour: Do theules matter?, in Crest Working Paper 110. 2006, CREST.

urtice, J. and W.P. Shively. Who Represents Us Best? One Member or Many? innternational Fulbright Conference "Eleies e Democracia". 2002. Lisbon, Portugal.

urtice, J. and W.P. Shively, Who Represents Us Best? One Member or Many?, in Theomparative Study of Electoral Systems H.-D. Klingemann, Editor. 2009, Oxford Universityress: Oxford. p. 171-192.

zesnik, M. Polish 'Exceptionalism': Voter Turnout in Poland in the light of CSES data. inSES Conference and Planning Comittee Meeting. 2008. Warsaw, Poland.

zenik, M., Voter Turnout Stability Evidence from Poland. Polish Sociological Review 2009.5(1): p. 107-122.

ahlberg, S., Political Parties and Perceptual Agreement: The Influence of Party Relatedactors on Voters Perceptions in Proportional Electoral Systems. Electoral Studies, 2009.

8(2): p. 270-278.ahlberg, S., Voters' Perceptions of Party Politics. - A Multilevel Approach , in Department ofolitical Science. 2009, University of Gothenburg: Gothenburg. p. 231.

ahlberg, S., Misperceptions and Effective Representation, inAnnual Meeting of the Americanolitical Science Association. 2010: Washington, D.C. p. 20.

ahlberg, S., The contextual sources of voters satisfaction with democracy in 6th ECPRGeneral Conference. 2011: Reykjavik.

ahlberg, S., H. Oscarsson, and D. Berlin. Ideological voting under different institutionalontexts: Political communication and effective representation in 37 countries. in XIV Annual

Meeting of the Nordic Political Science Association . 2005. University of Iceland, Reykjavik,celand.

alton, R. and S.A. Weldon, Partisanship and Party System Institutionalization. Party Politics,007. 13(2): p. 179-196.

alton, R.J., ed. Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Supportn Advanced Industrial Democracies. 2004, Oxford University Press: Oxford.

alton, R.J. (2005) The Myth of the Disengaged American . Public Opinion Pros.

alton, R.J., Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial


9/37

emocracies. 4 ed. 2005, Washington, DC: CQ Press.

alton, R.J., Social Modernization and the End of Ideology Debate: Patterns of Ideologicalolarization. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2006. 7(1): p. 1-22.

alton, R.J. The Quantity and the Quality of Party Systems: Party System Polarization, itsMeasurement and its Consequences. in 65th Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science

ssociation. 2007. Chicago, IL.

alton, R.J., The Quantity and the Quality of Party Systems. Party System Polarization, Its

Measurement, and Its Consequences Comparative Political Studies, 2008. 41(7): p. 899-920.

alton, R.J., Economics, Environmentalism and Party Alignments: A Note on Partisan Changen Advanced Industrial Democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 2009. 48(2): p.61-175.

alton, R.J., Voter Choice and Partisan Representation: One Link in the Chain of PartyGovernment, inAnnual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. 2009: Toronto,

A. p. 32.

alton, R.J., Ideology, Partisanship, and Democratic Development, in Comparing Democracies.lections and Voting in the 21st Century , L. LeDuc, R.G. Niemi, and P. Norris, Editors. 2010,age Publications: London. p. 143-166.

alton, R.J. and C.J. Anderson, eds. Citizens, Context, and Choice: How Context Shapesitizens' Electoral Choices. 2011, Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. 293.

alton, R.J., D.M. Farell, and I. McAllister, The Dynamics of Political Representation, in Howemocracy Works: Political Representation and Policy Congruence in Modern Societies :

ssays in Honour of Jacques Thomassen, M. Rosema, B. Denters, and K. Aarts, Editors.011, Pallas Publications - Amsterdam University Press: Amsterdam. p. 21-38.

alton, R.J. and A. Tanaka, The Patterns of Party Polarization in East Asia. Journal of East

sian Studies, 2007. 7(2): p. 203-223.

alton, R.J. and S.A. Weldon, L'immagine dei partiti politici nell'opinione pubblica: un maleecessario? [Public Images of Political Parties: A Necessary Evil?]. Rivista italiana di scienzaolitica, 2004. 34: p. 379-404.

alton, R.J. and S.A. Weldon (2005) Is the Party Over? Spreading Antipathy Toward Politicalarties. Public Opinion Pros.

alton, R.J. and S.A. Weldon, Public Images of Political Parties: A Necessary Evil? Westuropean Politics, 2005. 28(5): p. 931-951.

alton, R.J. and Y. Zhu, eds. Party Politics in East Asia: citizens, elections, and democraticevelopment. 2008, Lynne Rienner: Boulder, CO.

ez-Nicols, J.An Attempt to Interpret Party Attachment in Old and New Democracies. in 18thWorld Congress of the International Political Science Association. 2000. Qubec City, Canada.

ez-Nicols, J., K.A. Rasinski, and T.W. Smith.A Comparison of Public Responses toerrorist Attacks in Spain and the United States . in International conference on "Elections andemocratic Governance", Institute of Political Science, Academia Sinica (IPSAS). 2005. Taipei,aiwan.

inas, E. and S. Pardos Prado. Exploring contextual heterogeneity in issue voting: Proximityersus direction. in 4th General Conference of the European Consortium for Political Research.


10/37

007. Pisa, Italy.

owley, K. and B.D. Silver, Cross-National Survey Research and Subnational Pluralism.nternational Journal of Public Opinion Research, 2005. 17(2): p. 226-238.

owley, K.M. and B.D. Silver. Political Institutions and Minority Group Perceptions ofemocracy. in 103rd Annual meeting of the American Political Science Association . 2007.hicago.

rummond, A.Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Small and Large Party Systems. in 65thnnual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. 2007. Chicago, IL.

rummond, A.,Assimilation, contrast and voter projections of parties in left-right space: Doeshe electoral system matter? Party Politics, 2010: p. 1-34.

rummond, A.J. Thinking Outside the (Ballot) Box: Gauging the Cognitive Consequences oflectoral Rules for Partisans and Partisanship . in 101st Annual Meeting of the Americanolitical Science Association. 2005. Washington, DC.

rummond, A.J. Open and Closed: Party Affect and Sincere Voting in Electoral Context. in4th Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. 2006. Chicago.

rummond, A.J., Thinking Outside the (Ballot) Box: Gauging the Systemic and Cognitiveonsequences of Electoral Rules for Parties, Partisans and Partisanship, in Political Science.006, University of California, Irvine: Irvine. p. 243.

rummond, A.J. Ideological Bias and Perceptions of the Party Space: Comparing New and Oldemocracies. in 80th Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association . 2009. New

Orleans.

rummond, A.J.L., Jacek, Reconstructing Galicia: Mapping the Cultural and Civic Traditions ofhe Former Austrian Galicia in Poland and Ukraine. Europe-Asia Studies, 2010. 62(8): p. 1311-338.

uch, R.M., J. May, and D.A. Armstrong, Coalition-directed Voting in Multiparty Democracies.merican Political Science Review, 2010. 104(4): p. 22.

uch, R.M., J. May, and D.A. Armstrong II.A Strategic Ideological Vote. in Designingemocratic Institutions. 2008. London School of Economics, London.

uch, R.M. and R. Stevenson. The Micro-Foundations of the Economic Vote in Comparativeerspective. in 61st Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association . 2003.hicago.

uch, R.M. and R. Stevenson. The Micro-Foundations of the Economic Vote in Comparativeerspective. in Edinburgh 2003 ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops . 2003. Edinburgh,

cotland.

unn, K. and J. Thornton. Vote Choice and Ideological Consistency: A Comparativexamination. in 65th Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. 2007.hicago.

lff, M. Social Divisions, Political Sophistication, and Political Equality in Comparativeerspective. in 104th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. 2008.oston.


11/37

lff, M. Political Knowledge in Comparative Perspective: The Problem of Cross-Nationalquivalence of Measurement. in 67th Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Sciencessociation. 2009. Chicago.

llis, A. Participation and Turnout: Relating Knowledge and Tools to the Practical Questionsacing Democratic Reformers. in "Challenges to Democratic Governance": A Roundtablerganized by the Political Science Department of the University of Stockholm. 2004. Stockholm,weden.

nyedi, Z. and B. Todosijevic.Adversarial politics and party identification in Eastern andWestern Europe. in Nicosia 2006 ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops . 2006. Nicosia, Cyprus.

nyedi, Z. and G. Tka, Mo slabih: Politike stranke u Maarskoj [The Power of the Weak:olitical Parties in Hungary]. Politika Misao, 2001. 38(2): p. 68-90.

spirito-Santo, A., The Potential Symbolic Value of Descriptive Representation: The Case ofemale Representation, inAnnual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. 2009:oronto, CA. p. 35.

tienne, A., Do Election Results Represent People's Political Ideologies? A Study of the French002 Presidential Elections. French Politics, 2007. 5: p. 20-32.

ails, M.D. and H.N. Pierce, Changing Mass Attitudes and Democratic Deepening. PoliticalResearch Quarterly 2008. 63(1): p. 174-187.

arrell, D. and I. McAllister. Voter Satisfaction and Electoral Systems: Does Preferential VotingMake a Difference? in 51st Conference of the Australasian Political Studies Association. 2003.

niversity of Tasmania, Australia.

arrell, D. and I. McAllister. Voter Satisfaction and Electoral Systems: Does Preferential VotingMake a Difference? in 99th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.

003. Philadelphia.

arrell, D. and I. McAllister, Voter Satisfaction and Electoral Systems: Does Preferential Votingn Candidate-Centred Systems Make a Difference, in Center for the Study of Democracy Paper

4-04. 2004: University of California, Irvine, CA.

arrell, D. and I. McAllister, Voter Satisfaction and Electoral Systems: Does Preferential Votingn Candidate-Centred Systems make a Difference? European Journal of Political Research,006. 45(5): p. 723-749.

arrell, D.M. and I. McAllister, The Australian Electoral System: Origins, Variations andonsequences, ed. D. Farrell and I. McAllister. 2006, Sydney: UNSW Press.

isher, S.D. and S.B. Hobolt. Coalition Government and Retrospective Accountability. in 66thnnual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. 2008. Chicago.

isher, S.D. and S.B. Hobolt, Coalition Government and Electoral Accountability. Electoraltudies, 2010. 29(3): p. 358-369.

isher, S.D., et al. How the effect of political knowledge on turnout differs in plurality electoralystems in 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association . 2006.hiladelphia.

isher, S.D., et al.Accountability and Representation: how do voters approach elections? in5th Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. 2007. Chicago.

isher, S.D., et al., Disengaging Voters: Do Plurality Systems Discourage the Less


12/37

nowledgeable from Voting? Electoral Studies, 2008. 27(1): p. 89-104.

ortin, J. and D. Howell, Cross-National Comparison in the Comparative Study of Electoralystems (CSES): Capturing Demographics the Case of Religious Denomination, Ad Hoc

ession AH02: Cross-national, survey-research methodology, in XVII International Sociologicalssociation (ISA) World Congress of Sociology. 2010: Gothenburg, Sweden.

raile, M. Political Knowledge and the logic of voting: A comparative study . in 3rd Generalonference of the European Consortium for Political Research. 2005. Budapest, Hungary.

raile, M., La influencia del conocimiento poltico en las decisiones de voto (The influence ofolitical knowledge in voting decisions). Revista Espanola de Investigaciones Sociolgicas,007(120): p. 41-74.

raile, M., Political Knowledge and the Logic of Voting: A Comparative Study , in ControllingGovernments. Voters, Institutions, and Accountability, J.M. Maravall and I. Sanchez-Cuenca,

ditors. 2007, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

raile, M., Political Knowledge and the Logic of Voting: A Comparative Study , in ControllingGovernments: Voters, Institutions, and Accountability, J.M. Maravall and I. Sanchez-Cuenca,

ditors. 2008, Cambridges University Press: New York. p. 131-156.

ranklin, M.N. and C. Wlezien, Reinventing Election Studies. Electoral Studies, 2002. 21(2): p.31-338.

ranklin, M.N. and C. Wlezien, eds. The Future of Election Studies. 2002, Pergamon:msterdam.

reire, A. Issue Voting in Portugal: The 2002 legislative elections. in CSES Plenary Session.003. Stockholm, Sweden.

reire, A., Second Order Elections and Electoral Cycles in Democratic Portugal, 1975-2002 , innstituto de Ciencias Sociais WP 3-2003. 2003, Universidade de Lisboa: Lisboa, Portugal.

reire, A., Second-Order Elections and Electoral Cycles in Democratic Portugal. Southuropean Society & Politics, 2004. 9(3): p. 54-79.

reire, A. The Social Bases of Left and Right in Western Europe. in Electoral Behaviour andolitical Attitudes: Portugal in the European Context. 2005. Lisbon, Portugal: Social Science

nstitute of the Univesity of Lisbon.

reire, A. and M. Baum. Election Order and Electoral Cycles in Democratic Portugal, 1975-001. in 98th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. 2002. Boston, MA.

reire, A., M. Costa Lobo, and P. Magalhes, eds. Portugal a Votos. As Eleies Legislativase 2002. 2004, Imprensa de Cincias Sociais: Lisboa, Portugal.

Gallego, A. Why is Turnout More Unequal in Some Countries Than in Others? The Impact ofnstitutions and Political Mobilization. in 104th Annual Meeting of the American Political Sciencessociation. 2008. Boston, MA.

Gallego, A., Where Else Does Turnout Decline Come From? Education, Age, Generation anderiod Effects in Three European Countries. Scandinavian Political Studies, 2009. 32(1): p. 23-4.

Gallego, A., Understanding Unequal Turnout: Education and Voting in Comparative


13/37

erspective. Electoral Studies, 2010. 29(2): p. 239-248.

Garcia-Trejo, Y.A Never-Ending Gap? Political Knowledge and Gender Differences in Mexico.n 67th Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. 2009. Chicago, IL.

Gidengil, E., et al., The Correlates and Consequences of Anti-Partyism in the 1997 Canadianlection. Party Politics, 2001. 7(4): p. 491-513.

Giger, N., The electoral consequences of social policy. An empirical answer to the new politicsterature, in 67th Annual National Conference of the Midwest Political Science Association.

009: Chicago, Il.

Giger, N., Do voters punish the government for welfare state retrenchment A comparative studyf electoral costs associated with social policy. Comparative European Politics, 2010. 8(4): p.15-443.

Giger, N., Is Social Policy Retrenchment Unpopular? How Welfare Reforms Affect Governmentopularity. European Sociological Review, 2011.

Golder, M. and J. Stramski. Ideological Congruence and Two Visions of Democracy. in 103rdnnual meeting of the American Political Science Association. 2007. Chicago, IL.

Golder, M. and J. Stramski, Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions. American Journalf Political Science, 2010. 54(1): p. 90-106.

Gray, M.M. In the Midst of Fellows: The Social Context of the American Turnout Decision. in9th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. 2003. Philadelphia.

Gray, M.M., In the Midst of Fellows: The Social Context of the American Turnout Decision, inolitical Science. 2003, University of California, Irvine: Irvine. p. 234.

Grofman, B., Constraints on the turnout gap between high and low knowledge (or income)oters: Combining the Duncan-Davis method of bounds with the Taagepera method of bounds.

lectoral Studies, 2010. 29(4): p. 673-677.

Grofman, B. and R. Kline, How many political parties are there, really? A new measure of thedeologically cognizable number of parties/party groupings. Party Politics, 2011.

Grnlund, K. How Education and Political Information Affect Turnout in Different Electoralystems. in Turin 2002 ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops . 2002. Universit di Torino, Italy.

Grnlund, K. Knowledge and Turnout: A Comparative Analysis. in 2nd General Conference ofhe European Consortium for Political Research. 2003. Marburg, Germany.

Grnlund, K. Political Knowledge and the Internet. in XIV Annual Meeting of the Nordic Politicalcience Association. 2005. Reykjavik, Iceland.

Grnlund, K. and H. Milner. The Determinants of Political Knowledge in a Comparativeerspective. in 100th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Associaton 2004.hicago, IL.

Grnlund, K. and H. Milner, The Determinants of Political Knowledge in Comparativeerspective. Scandinavian Political Studies, 2006. 29(4): p. 386-406.

Grosse, A. and A. Appleton, "Big Social Science" in Comparative Politics, in The Comparativetudy of Electoral Systems. 2009, Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Gschwend, T. Comparative Politics of Strategic Voting: An Empirical Test of the Leys-Sartori


14/37

onjecture. in 61st Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association . 2003.hicago, IL.

Gschwend, T. Comparative Politics of Strategic Voting: A Hierarchy of Electoral Systems . in9th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. 2003. Philadelphia, PA.

Gschwend, T., Comparative Politics of Strategic Voting: A Hierarchy of Electoral Systems , inFB 504 Discussion Paper 04-41. 2004, Universitt Mannheim: Mannheim.

Gschwend, T. Comparative Politics of Strategic Voting: A Hierarchy of Electoral Systems . in

006 Annual Conference of the Elections, Public Opinion and Parties Group of the Politicaltudies Associations. 2006. University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Gschwend, T., District Magnitude and the Comparative Study of Strategic Voting , in Theomparative Study of Electoral Systems, H.-D. Klingemann, Editor. 2009, Oxford Universityress: Oxford.

Gschwend, T. and D. Leuffen, Divided We Stand - Unified We Govern? Cohabitation andRegime Voting in the 2002 French Elections. British Journal of Political Science, 2005. 35(4): p.

91-712.

aerpfer, C.W. Political Support for Democracy and Satisfaction with Democracy in Europeanolitical Systems. in CSES Conference and Planning Commmittee Meeting. 2006. Seville,pain.

ale, H.E., Why Not Parties in Russia? Democracy, Federalism, and the State. 2005, Nework, NY: Cambridge University Press. 280.

ansen, J.M., Task Force on the Federal Election System, Chapter 1: Sizing the Problem.001, Miller Center of Public Affairs, University of Virginia: Charlottesville, VA.

ausstein, B. and E. Brislinger, Data and Information Transfer Between Eastern and Westernurope, in Information Dissemination and Access in Russia and Eastern Europe: Problems and

olutions in East and West, R. Walker and M.F. Taylor, Editors. 1998, IOS Press: Netherlands.. 77-87.

eath, A., S. Fisher, and S. Smith, The Globalization of Public Opinion Research. AnnualReview of Political Science, 2005. 8: p. 297-333.

ellwig, T., Explaining the Salience of LeftRight Ideology in Postindustrial Democracies: TheRole of Structural Economic Change. European Journal of Political Research, 2008. 47(6): p.

87-709.

ellwig, T. and L. Ezrow, Globalization and the Responsiveness of Political Parties in 6thCPR General Conference. 2011: Reykjavik.

ellwig, T.T., Interdependence, Government Constraints, and Economic Voting. The Journal ofolitics, 2001. 63(4): p. 1141-1162.

ellwig, T.T. Policy Voting in Postindustrial Democracies: Measuring and Explaining thealience of Left-Right Ideology. in 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Political Sciencessociation. 2006. Philadelphia, PA.

enderson, A. Satisfaction with Democracy: Evidence from Westminster systems. in 62ndnnual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. 2004. Chicago, IL.

enderson, A. Satisfaction with Democracy: Evidence from Westminster systems. in 77thnnual Conference of the Canadian Political Science Association. 2004. Winnipeg, Canada.


15/37

enderson, A., Satisfaction with Democracy: The Impact of Winning and Losing in Westminsterystems. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 2008. 18(1): p. 3-26.

enjak, A. New Social Divisions and Party System Developments. in Edinburgh 2003 ECPRoint Sessions of Workshops. 2003. Edinburgh, Scotland.

ill, D. The Impact of the Separation of Powers on National Level Turnout . in 104th Annual

Meeting of the American Political Science Association. 2008. Boston, MA.

ill, D. Presidents, Parliaments and Turnout: The Indirect Effects of the Separation of Powersn the Probability of Voting. in 104th Annual Meeting of the American Political Sciencessociation 2008. Boston, MA

obolt, S.B. and J.A. Karp, Voters and coalition governments. Electoral Studies, 2010. 29(3): p.99-307.

obolt, S.B. and R. Klemmensen. Welfare to Vote: The Effect of Government Spending onurnout. in CSES Plenary Session. 2005. Washington DC, United States.

obolt, S.B. and R. Klemmensen. Welfare to Vote: The Effect of Government Spending onurnout. in 64th Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. 2006. Chicago,

L.

olmberg, S. Candidate Knowledge Differs Across Electoral Systems. in 18th World Congressf the International Political Science Association. 2000. Qubec City, Canada.

olmberg, S.,Are political parties necessary? Electoral Studies, 2003. 22(2): p. 287-299.

olmberg, S., Candidate Recognition in Different Electoral Systems, in The Comparative Studyf Electoral Systems, H.-D. Klingemann, Editor. 2009, Oxford University Press: Oxford.

olmberg, S. and H. Oscarsson, Svenskt vljarbeteende. 2002, University of Gteborg,

tatistics Sweden: Gteborg, Stockholm.olzner, C. Political Opportunities and Political Participation in Mexico. in 66th Annual Meetingf the Midwest Political Science Association. 2008. Chicago, IL.

olzner, C.A. Poverty of Democracy: Neoliberal Reforms and Political Participation of the Poorn Mexico. in 63rd Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. 2005. Chicago,L.

olzner, C.A. Policies and Political Participation in Latin America. in 102nd Annual Meeting ofhe American Political Science Association. 2006. Philadelphia, PA.

owell, D., Enhancing Quality and Comparability in the Comparative Study of Electoralystems (CSES), in Survey Methods in Multicultural, Multinational, and Multiregional Contexts ,.A. Harkness, et al., Editors. 2010, Wiley. p. 525-534.

owell, D.A. and K. Long Jusko, Methodological Challenges: Research Opportunities andQuestions for the Future, in The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, H.-D. Klingemann,

ditor. 2009, Oxford University Press: Oxford.

owell, D.A. and K.J. Long. The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. Questions for theuture: Methodological Research Opportunities. in Conference on the "Comparative Study oflectoral Systems". 2002. WZB, Berlin, Germany.


16/37

uang, C. Taiwans Election and Democratization Study, 2001 (TEDS 2001). in CSES Plenaryession. 2003. Stockholm, Sweden.

uang, M.-h., Y.-t. Chang, and Y.-h. Chu, Identifying Sources of Democratic Legitimacy: AMultilevel Analysis Electoral Studies, 2008. 27(1): p. 45-62.

uber, J., G. Kernell, and E. Leoni. The Institutional Origins of Party Identification. in 61stnnual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. 2003. Chicago, IL.

uber, J., G. Kernell, and E.L. Leoni, Institutional Context, Cognitive Resources and Partyttachments Across Democracies. Political Analysis, 2005. 13(4): p. 365-386.

uber, J.D., Measuring ethnic voting: Does proportional representation politicize ethnicity?010.

uber, J.D., G. Kernell, and E.L. Leoni. Institutional context and party attachments instablished democracies. in 61st Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association .003. Chicago, IL.

uber, J.D. and P. Stanig, Church-state separation and redistribution. Journal of Publicconomics, 2011. 95(7-8): p. 828-836.

keda, K.i. Recent Japanese Elections with CSES2 Data: Based on JES III project . in CSESonference and Planning Commmittee Meeting. 2006. Seville, Spain.

keda, K.i. Japanese National Election in 2005: Based on JES III project . in CSES Conferencend Planning Commmittee Meeting. 2006. Seville, Spain.

keda, K.i. Recent Japanese Elections with CSES3 Data: Based on a Panel Survey with Asianarometer. in CSES Conference: Political Institutions - Rationality - Electoral Behavior. 2008.

Warsaw School of Social Psychology, Warsaw Poland.

keda, K.i., T. Kobayashi, and M. Hoshimoto, Does Political Participation Make a Difference?he Relationship Between Political Choice, Civic Engagement and Political Efficacy. Electoraltudies, 2008. 27(1): p. 77-88.

rjani, A., Electoral Behavior in the 2005 Albanian Parliamentary Election. Albanian Journal ofolitics, 2005. 1(1): p. 75-86.

saev, K. Peculiarities and Results of the 2005 Elections in Kyrgyzstan . in CSES Conferencend Planning Commmittee Meeting. 2006. Seville, Spain.

ackson, R.J. and D. Jackson, eds. Comparative Government: An Introduction to Politicalcience. 1996, Prentice Hall: Toronto, Ontario.

aime-Castillo, A.M., Economic Inequality and Electoral Participation: A Cross-Countryvaluation, inAnnual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. 2009: Toronto,A. p. 31.

asiewicz, K., Pocketbook or Rosary? Economic and Identity: Voting in the 2000 - 2001lections in Poland. Studies in Public Policy, 2003. 379.

asiewicz, K. The Old Regime and Democracy. in CSES Conference: Political Institutions -Rationality - Electoral Behavior. 2008. Warsaw School of Social Psychology, Warsaw Poland.

ensen, J.L., P.E. Sum, and D.T. Flynn, Political Orientations and Behavior of Publicmployees: A Cross-National Comparison. Journal for Public Administration Research and


17/37

heory, 2009. 19(4): p. 709-730.

hee, B.-K. Economic Voting in the Third World. in 62nd Annual Meeting of the Midwestolitical Science Association. 2004. Chicago, IL.

ohann, D. and M. Wagner, Do knowledgeable voters take more complex decisions? Politicalophistication and models of issue voting, in 6th ECPR General Conference. 2011: Reykjavik.

ohnston, R., Learning about Ourselves from Learning about Others: Comparative Studies oflections. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 2005. 7(2): p. 281 - 291.

ohnston, R., Party Identification: Unmoved Mover or Sum of Preferences. Annual Review ofolitical Science, 2006. 9: p. 329-351.

ou, W., The Heuristic Value of the Left-Right Schema in East Asia. International Politicalcience Review, 2010. 31(3): p. 366-394.

usko, K.L.Are all Politics Local? A Multi-Level Analysis of Voters' Decisions. in PhD Summerchool on European Parties and Party Systems. 2002. Keele, UK.

age, R. Path-Dependency Effects in Electoral System Change. in 18th World Congress of thenternational Political Science Association. 2000. Qubec City, Canada.

arp, J., Party Systems and Mobilization: How Polarization Reduces Efficacy and Engagementn 6th ECPR General Conference. 2011: Reykjavik.

arp, J. and D. Brockington, Social Desirability and Response Validity: A Comparative Analysisf Over-Reporting Turnout in Five Countries. The Journal of Politics, 2005. 67(3): p. 825-840.

arp, J.A. Electoral Systems and Party Mobilization. in 19th World Congress of thenternational Political Science Association. 2003. Durban, South Africa.

arp, J.A. Party Mobilization and Political Participation in New and Old Democracies. in 102nd

nnual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. 2006. Philadelphia, PA.arp, J.A. and S.A. Banducci. Electoral Rules and Voter Participation: A Cross-Nationalnalysis of Individual-Level Behavior. in 95th Annual Meeting of the American Political Sciencessociation. 1999. Atlanta, GA.

arp, J.A. and S.A. Banducci. Electoral Rules and Voter Participation: A Cross-Nationalnalysis of Individual-Level Behavior. in 18th World Congress of the International Politicalcience Association. 2000. Qubec City, Canada.

arp, J.A. and S.A. Banducci. Electoral Systems and Political Efficacy . in CSES Conferencend Planning Commmittee Meeting. 2006. Seville, Spain.

arp, J.A. and S.A. Banducci, Party Mobilization and Political Participation in New and Oldemocracies. Party Politics, 2007. 13(2): p. 217-34.

arp, J.A. and S.A. Banducci, Political Efficacy and Participation in Twenty-Sevenemocracies: How Electoral Systems Shape Political Behaviour. British Journal of Politicalcience, 2008. 38(2): p. 311-334.

arp, J.A. and S.A. Banducci, When Politics is not just a Man's Game: Women'sRepresentation and Political Engagement. Electoral Studies, 2008. 27(1): p. 105-115.


18/37

arp, J.A., S.A. Banducci, and S. Bowler, Getting Out the Vote: Party Mobilization in aomparative Perspective. British Journal of Political Science, 2007. 38(1): p. 91-112.

arvonen, L. Preferential Voting: Does it Make a Difference? in 18th World Congress of thenternational Political Science Association. 2000. Qubec City, Canada.

ayser, M.A. and M. Peress. The Buck Stops over There? Globalization and Electoralccountability. in Political Science Seminar. 2010. University of Mannheim.

edar, O. Policy Balancing in Comparative Context: Institutional Mediation of Voter Behavior. in

dinburgh 2003 ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops . 2003. Edinburgh, Scotland.

edar, O., When Moderate Voters Prefer Extreme Parties: Policy Balancing in Parliamentarylections. American Political Science Review, 2005. 99(2): p. 185-99.

edar, O. How Diffusion of Power in Parliaments Affects Voter Choice. in CSES Plenaryession. 2005. Washington DC, .

edar, O., How Diffusion of Power in Parliaments Affects Voter Choice. Political Analysis,005. 13(4): p. 410-429.

edar, O., How Voters Work around Institutions: Policy Balancing in Staggered Elections.lectoral Studies, 2006. 25(3): p. 509-527.

edar, O., Voting for Policy, Not Parties: How Voters Compensate for Power Sharing .ambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. 2009, New York: Cambridge University Press.

ees, A. and J. Thomassen. Satisfaction with Democracy: Do Institutions Matter? in 102ndnnual meeting of the American Political Science Association. 2006. Philadelphia, PA.

ellermann, M.R., Essays on Parties and Elections in Federal Systems, in Government 2009,arvard University: Cambridge. p. 210.

ernell, G. Party Constitutions and Constituent Representation. in 102nd Annual Meeting of themerican Political Science Association. 2006. Philadelphia, PA.

ernell, G. Candidate Selection and Political Participation. in 102nd Annual Meeting of themerican Political Science Association 2006. Philadelphia, PA.

ernell, G. Party Experience, Consistency and Partisanship. in 65th Annual Meeting of theMidwest Political Science Association. 2007. Chicago, IL.

ernell, G., Political Party Organizations and Representations: Party Responsiveness,andidate Heterogeneity, and Voter Behavior in Mature Parliamentary Democracies, in Politicalcience. 2008, Columbia University: New York City. p. 176.

ernell, G.,A Tale of Two Constituencies: How Party Decentralization and Preference Votingorce (Some) Candidates to Balance between Party Members and the General Electorate .010, Northwestern University.

im, M., System support and ideological congruence between voters and policy positions , inolitical Science. 2004, State University of New York at Binghamton: Binghamton. p. 194.

im, M., Cross-National Analyses of Satisfaction with Democracy and Ideological Congruence.ournal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties, 2009. 19(1): p. 49-72.

ittilson, M.C. Rising Political Inequality in Established Democracies: Mobilization, Socio-conomic Status and Voter Turnout, 1960s to 2000 . in 101st Annual Meeting of the American


19/37

olitical Science Association. 2005. Washington, DC.

ittilson, M.C. and C.J. Anderson, Comparing Voter Participation: Individual Resources,Orientations and the Context of Party Politics, inAnnual Meeting of The American Political

cience Association. 2009.

ittilson, M.C. and M.M. Gray. Voter Equality in Post-Industrialized Nations: IndividualResources and Political Context. in 64th Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science

ssociation. 2006. Chicago, IL.

lein, M. and M. Ptschke, Wahlen im sozialen Kontext: Mehrebenenanalyse desWhlerverhaltens bei den Bundestagswahlen der Jahre 1969 bis 1998, in 50 Jahre EmpirischeWahlforschung in Deutschland, M. Klein, et al., Editors. 2000, Westdeutscher Verlag: Opladen.

. 182-211.

lingemann, H.-D. The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems: A Reminder of Module One . inSES Plenary Session. 2003. Stockholm, Sweden.

lingemann, H.-D. Questions and Answers: How Political Institutions influence the Votingehavior. in CSES Conference: Political Institutions - Rationality - Electoral Behavior. 2008.

Warsaw School of Psychology, Warsaw, Poland.

lingemann, H.-D., ed. The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. 2009, Oxford Universityress: Oxford. 264.

lingemann, H.-D., The Impact of Political Institutions: A Contribution of the "Comparativetudy of Electoral Systems" (CSES) to Micro-Macro Theories of Political Attitude Formation

nd Voting Behavior, in The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, H.-D. Klingemann,ditor. 2009, Oxford University Press: Oxford. p. 3-27.

lingemann, H.-D. and B. Weels, How Voters Cope with the Complexity of their Politicalnvironment: Differentiation of Political Supply, Effectiveness of Political Institutions, and the

alculus of Voting, in The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, H.-D. Klingemann, Editor.009, Oxford University Press: Oxford. p. 237-265.

lingemann, H.-D. and B. Wessels. Voter Rationalities in Different Electoral Systems. in 18thWorld Congress of the International Political Science Association. 2000. Qubec City, Canada.

lingemann, H.-D. and B. Wessels, Political Consequences of Germany's Mixed-Memberystem: Personalization at the Grass-Roots?, in Mixed Member Electoral Systems. The Best ofoth Worlds?, M.S. Shugart and M.P. Wattenberg, Editors. 2001, Oxford University Press:

Oxford. p. 279-296.

lingemann, H.-D. and B. Wessels. Sincere Voting in Different Electoral Systems. in Berlinonference The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems . 2002. Berlin, Germany.

night, K. and M. Marsh, Varieties of Election Studies. Electoral Studies, 2002. 21(2): p. 169-87.

ostadinova, T.,Abstain or Rebel: Corruption Perceptions and Voting in East Europeanlections. Politics & Policy, 2010. 37(4): p. 691-714.

ostelka, The Turnout Decline in the Post-Communist Members States of the EU: AMulticausal Explanation, in ECPR Graduate Conference. 2010. p. 31.

roh, M., Parties, Politicians, and Policies: Orientations of Vote Choice Across Voters andontexts, in Faculty of Social and Behavioral Science. 2003, University of Amsterdam:


20/37

msterdam.

roh, M. Contextual Variation in Voters' Reasoning: Voting in Systems of Single Party andoalition Governments. in 19th World Congress of the International Political Sciencessociation. 2003. Durban, South Africa.

roh, M. Personal Voting: Individual and Contextual Determinants of Political Leadership . inGemeinsame Tagung des Arbeitskreises Interkultureller Demokratievergleich und der Ad-hoc-

Gruppe Empirische Methoden der Politikwissenschaft. 2004. Universitt Lneburg.

roh, M., The Ease of Ideological Voting: Voter Sophistication and Party System Complexity , inhe Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, H.-D. Klingemann, Editor. 2009, Oxfordniversity Press: Oxford. p. 220-236.

acewell, O. Measures of Immigration and Radical Right Voting in Europe . in 65th AnnualMeeting of the Midwest Political Science Association . 2007. Chicago, IL.

andman, T. and N. Robinson, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Comparative Politics . 2009, Sage:ondon.

au, R.R., et al. Correct Voting Across 30 Democracies (and 40 Elections). in 63rd AnnualMeeting of the Midwest Political Science Association . 2005. Chicago, IL.

au, R.R., et al. Correct Voting Across 32 Democracies. in 66th Annual Meeting of the Midwestolitical Science Association. 2008. Chicago, IL.

eDuc, L., J.H. Pammet, and H. Bastedo. The Problem of Young Voters: A Qualitative andQuantitative Analysis. in 104th Annual Meeting ot the American Political Science Association.

008. Boston, MA.

ee, H. Gender Differences in Political Participation in Korea and Japan . in 20th Worldongress of the International Political Science Association. 2006. Fukuoka, Japan.

ee, N.-Y., et al. The Political Effects of the Introduction of Two-Ballot Votes System inorea: Comparison with Japan, New Zealand, and Germany. in CSES Conference in Taiwan005. Taipei, Taiwan.

efkofridi, Z. and A. Gallego, Policy (in)congruence & Abstention in European democracies inth ECPR General Conference. 2011: Reykjavik.

ewis, P.G. Party System Institutionalisation in East-Central Europe: Empirical Dimensions andentative Conclusions. in Rennes 2008 ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops . 2008. Universityf Rennes, France.

ewis-Beck, M.S. and M.C. Lobo.Anchoring the Portuguese Voter: Panel Dynamics as a Newlectorate. in 107th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. 2008.

oston , MA.

isthaug, O., B. Aardal, and I.O. Ellis. Institutional Variation and Political Support: An Analysisf CSES Data from 16 Countries. in 18th World Congress of the International Political Sciencessociation. 2000. Qubec City, Canada.

isthaug, O., B. Aardal, and I.O. Ellis, Institutional Variation and Political Support: An Analysisf CSES Data from 29 Countries, in The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems H.-D.lingemann, Editor. 2009, Oxford University Press: Oxford. p. 311-332.

iu, A., Political Participation and Dissatisfaction with Democracy: A Comparative Study of Newnd Stable Democracies. 2001, The Research Methods Institute (URL:


21/37

ttp://www.ResearchMethods.org). p. 11.

obo, M.C. The Impact of Party Leaders on the Outcome of the 2002 Portuguese Legislativelections: Choosing between Relatively Unpopular Candidates. in International Conference on

Portugal at the Polls'. 2002. Lisbon, Portugal.

obo, M.C., Parties and Leader Effects: Impact of Leaders in the Vote for Different Types ofarties. Party Politics, 2008. 14(3): p. 281-298.

oewen, P.J. and A. Blais. Testing Publius' Federalism: Losers Consent, Winners Lament? in

SES Conference and Planning Commmittee Meeting. 2006. Seville, Spain.

ong Jusko, K. The Political Representation of the Poor: A Research Note Using CSES Data.n Plenary Meeting of the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. 2005. Washington, D.C.

ong Jusko, K. and W. Phillips Shively,Applying a Two-Step Strategy to the Analysis of Cross-ational Public Opinion Data. Political Analysis, 2005. 13(4): p. 327-344.

ucas, L. The Institutional Determinants of Political Sophistication. in 101st Annual Meeting ofhe American Political Science Association. 2005. Washington, DC.

utz, G., Participation, Information and Democracy, in Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftlicheakultt. 2004, Universitt Bern: Bern.

Magalhes, P.C., Disaffected Democrats: Political Culture and Political Action in Portugal. Westuropean Politics, 2005. 28(5): p. 973-991.

Magalhes, P.C., Exposure to Polls, Cognitive Mobilization, and Voting Behavior: the 2002General Elections in Portugal , in Research paper. 2006: Instituto de Cincias Sociais da

niversidade de Lisboa. p. 22.

Mahler, V. Income Redistribution by the State: A Comparative Analysis of the Developed World .n 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association . 2006. Philadelphia, PA.

Mahler, V., Electoral Turnout and Income Redistribution by the State: A Cross-Nationalnalysis of the Developed Democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 2008. 47(2):. 161-183.

Mahler, V. and S. Skowronski. Inequality, Redistribution and Electoral Turnout: A Cross-ational Analysis of the Developed Countries. in 104th Annual Meeting of the Americanolitical Science Association. 2008. Boston, MA.

Maimone, C.R., Voter Decision-Making from a Comparative Perspective, in Political Science.007, Stanford University. p. 189.

Maimone, C.R. and J.C. Pope. Candidates vs. Parties: How Electoral Systems Shape Voter. in

3rd Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. 2005. Chicago, IL.

Mainwaring, S. and M. Torcal. Party System Institutionalization and Party System Theory: Afterhe Third Wave of Democratization. in 101st Annual Meeting of the American Political Sciencessociation. 2005. Washington, DC.

Mainwaring, S. and M. Torcal, Party System Institutionalization and Party System Theory Afterhe Third Wave of Democratization, in Kellog Institute Working Papers Series WPS #319. 2005,he Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies: Notre Dame, Indiana.


22/37

Mainwaring, S. and M. Torcal, Party System Institutionalization and Party System Theory Afterhe Third Wave of Democratization, in Working Papers Online Series, Estudio/Working Paper1/2005. 2005, Departamento de Ciencia Poltica y Relaciones Internacionales: Facultad deerecho, Universidad Autnoma de Madrid, Spain.

Mainwaring, S. and M. Torcal, Teoria e institucionalizao dos sistemas partidrios aps aerceira onda de democratizao. Opinio Pblica, 2005. 11(2): p. 249-286.

Mainwaring, S. and E. Zoco, Political Sequences and the Stabilization of Interpartyompetition. Party Politics, 2007. 13(2): p. 155-78.

Maravall, J.M. and I. Sanchez-Cuenca, eds. Controlling Governments: Voters, Institutions, andccountability. 2008, Cambridge University Press: New York. 311.

Marian, C.G., Informare politica si sisteme electorale in Europa Centrala si de Est. Revistaransilvan de tiine Administrative, 2004. 1(10): p. 84-90.

Markowski, R. Satisfaction with Democracy and Diffuse Political Support . in 18th Worldongress of the International Political Science Association. 2000. Qubec City, Canada.

Markowski, R. Diffuse Political Support in New and Stable Democracies: Do Institutions Matter?n IWM Conferences, Lectures and Seminars . 2002. Vienna, Austria: Institute for Humanciences (Institut fr die Wissenschaften vom Menschen).

Markowski, R. Diffuse Political Support in New and Old Democracies. in Conference on theComparative Study of Electoral Systems". 2002. Berlin, Germany.

Markowski, R. Incumbents and Opposition: On Two Different Manifestations of Representationnd Accountability. in 19th World Congress of the International Political Science Association.003. Durban, South Africa.

Markowski, R. Electoral Accountability in New Democracies. in 99th Annual Meeting of themerican Political Science Association. 2003. Philadelphia, PA.

Markowski, R. Synergy and Trade-offs between Political Representation and Accountability in

table and New Democracies. in International Conference on "Elections and DemocraticGovernance", Institute of Political Science, Academia Sinica (IPSAS) . 2005. Taipei, Taiwan.

Markowski, R. Meaningful Choices: Micro Level Logic. in CSES Conference and Planningommmittee Meeting. 2006. Seville, Spain.

Markowski, R. Representation, Accountability, and Rational Electoral Behavior'. in 103rdnnual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. 2007. Chicago, IL.

Markowski, R. and J. Tucker. Subjective vs. Objective Proximity in Poland: Controversies in thehoice of Measurement? in CSES Conference: Political Institutions - Rationality - Electoralehavior. 2008. Warsaw, Poland.

Marsh, M., Electoral Context. Electoral Studies, 2002. 21(2): p. 207-217.

Marsh, M.An insecure anchor for a floating party system: party identification in Ireland. indinburgh 2003 ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops . 2003. Edinburgh, Scotland.

Marsh, M., Party Identification and Party Choice in Ireland: An Insecure Anchor for a Floatingarty System. Electoral Studies, 2006. 25(3): p. 489-508.

Marsh, M. and J. Tilley. Golden halos and forked tails: The attribution of credita and blame toovernments and its impact on vote choice . in 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Political


23/37

cience Association. 2006. Philadelphia.

Marsh, M. and C. van der Eijk. Dont expect me to vote for you just because I like you, even ifou do make me feel warm inside: A comparison of the validity of non-ipsative measures of

arty support. in 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association . 2007.hicago, IL.

Marthaler, S., The Paradox of the Politically-Sophisticated Partisan: The French Case. Westuropean Politics, 2008. 31(5): p. 937-959.

McAllister, I.,Accountability, Representation and Satisfaction with Democracy. Internationalournal of Public Opinion Research, 2005. 17(3): p. 371-379.

McAllister, I., The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems: Module 3 and Beyond , in ICOREews. 2005. p. 2-3.

McAllister, I. The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Project: An Overview. in 20th Worldongress of the International Political Science Association. 2006. Fukuoka, Japan.

McAllister, I., Social Structure and Party Support in the East Asian Democracies. Journal ofast Asian Studies, 2007. 7(2): p. 225-249.

McAllister, I., Public Support for Democracy: Results from the Comparative Study of Electoralystems Project Electoral Studies, 2008. 27(1): p. 1-4.

McAllister, I. and S. White. Political Parties and Democratic Consolidation in Postcommunistocieties. in 20th World Congress of the International Political Science Association. 2006.ukuoka, Japan.

McAllister, I. and S. White, Political Parties and Democratic Consolidation in Post-Communistocieties. Party Politics, 2007. 13(2): p. 197-216.

McDonald, M. and K. Myunghee. On Observing the Variety of Party Policy Offerings in Nationaleft-Right Policy Space. in 67th Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.009. Chicago, IL.

Meleshevich, A.A., Party Systems in Post-Soviet Countries: A Comparative Study of Politicalnstitutionalization in the Baltic States, Russia, and Ukraine. 2007, New York, NY: Palgrave

Macmillan. 280.

Meneguello, R.A democracia brasileira, 21 anos depois. in Primer Congreso Latinoamericanoe Opinin Pblica. 2007. Colonia del Sacramento, Uruguay.

Merolla, J.L. and E.J. Zechmeister. El Poder del Peje: Crises and Leadership Perceptionsollowing the 2006 Mexican Election. in 65th Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Sciencessociation. 2007. Chicago, IL.

Milner, H. Political Participation, and the Political Knowledge of Adults and Adolescents. in 30thCPR Joint Sessions of Workshops 22: "Political Participation and Information" . 1998. Turin.

Milner, H. (2001) Civic Literacy in Comparative Context: Why Canadians Should be Concerned.olicy Matters 2, 1-40.

Milner, H., Civic Literacy: How Informed Citizens Make Democracy Work. 2002, Hanover, NH:niversity Press of New England. 293.

Milner, H. The Voters' Paradox: Bringing back the Knowledge Dimension . in 52nd Annualonference of the Political Studies Association, "Making Politics Count". 2002. Aberdeen,


24/37

cotland.

Milner, H. Civic Drop-outs? What Young Citizens Know and Dont Know About Politics: Canadan Comparative Perspective. in 98th Annual Meeting of the American Political Sciencessociation. 2002. Boston, MA.

Milner, H. Civic Drop-outs? What Young Citizens Know and Dont Know About Politics: Canadan Comparative Perspective. in Citizenship on Trial: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Politicalocialization of Adolescents. 2002. McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Milner, H. Creating an Instrument for Testing Political Knowledge: Theoretical Considerationsnd Preliminary Findings. in 2nd General Conference of the European Consortium for Political

Research. 2003. Marburg, Germany.

Milner, H. The Phenomenon of Political Dropouts: Age, Abstention and Political Institutions. inppsala 2004 ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops . 2004. Uppsala, Sweden.

Milner, H. Does Proportional Representation Boost Turnout? A Political Knowledge-basedxplanation. in CSES Conference. 2006. Toronto.

Mochmann, E., European Co-Operation in Social Science Data Dissemination, in Informationissemination and Access in Russia and Eastern Europe: Problems and Solutions in East and

West, R. Walker and M.F. Taylor, Editors. 1998, IOS Press: Netherlands. p. 33-43.

Mochmann, E. European Infrastructure Needs for Comparative Socio-Economic Research. inU Socio-Economic Research Conference. 1999. Brussels, Belgium.

acif, B., Understanding Party Discipline in the Mexican Chamber of Deputies; the Centralizedarty Model, in Legislative Politics in Latin America, S. Morgenstern and B. Nacif, Editors.002, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. p. 254-284.

agler, J.A Comparative Analysis of Variation in Turnout by Education . in 64th Annual Meetingf the Midwest Political Science Association. 2006. Chicago, IL.

alen, J.E., Comparative Elections: Building a Basic Reference Collection. Reference & Userervices Quarterly, 2001. 41(2): p. 119-26.

eller, K. and S.I. Thaidigsmann, Gelungene Identittserweiterung durch Namensnderung?Treue " Whler, Zu- und Abwanderer der Linkspartei bei der Bundestagswahl 2005 , in Dieundestagswahl 2005: Analysen des Wahlkampfes und der Wahlergebnisse , F. Brettschneider,

O. Niedermayer, and B. Weels, Editors. 2007, VS Verlag: Wiesbaden (Ger). p. 421-453.

evitte, N., et al. Socio-Economic Status and Non-Voting: A Comparative Cross-Nationalnalysis. in 18th World Congress of the International Political Science Association. 2000.

Qubec City, Canada.

evitte, N., et al., Socioeconomic Status and Non-Voting: A Cross-National Comparativenalysis, in The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, H.-D. Klingemann, Editor. 2009,

Oxford University Press: Oxford. p. 85-108.

ickel Makszin, K. Explaining Continuity and Change in Postcommunist Central Europeanamily Benefits: The Politics of Redistribution in Postcommunist Central European Welfare

tates. in My PhD International Conference "Europe in motion: society, labour market andustainability in the age of migration". 2009. Bratislava, Slovak Republic.

ishizawa, Y. Economic Voting: Do Institutions Affect the Way Voters Evaluate Incumbents? in8th World Congress of the International Political Science Association. 2000. Qubec City,


25/37

anada.

ishizawa, Y., Economic Voting: Do Institutions Affect the Way Voters Evaluate Incumbents?,n The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, H.-D. Klingemann, Editor. 2009, Oxfordniversity Press: Oxford. p. 193-219.

orris, P. Ballots not Bullets: Testing the Consociational Theories of Ethnic Conflict, Electoralystems and Democratization. in Conference on Constitutional Design 2000: Institutionalesign, Conflict Management and Democracy in the late Twentieth Century . 1999. University ofotre Dame, Notre Dame, IN.

orris, P., The Twilight of Westminster? Electoral Reform and Its Consequences. Politicaltudies, 2001. 49(5): p. 877-900.

orris, P., Women's Power at the Ballot Box, in Voter Turnout from 1945 to 2000: A GlobalReport on Political Participation . 2001, International IDEA: Stockholm. p. 12.

orris, P., Ballots not Bullets: Testing the Consociational Theories of Ethnic Conflict, Electoralystems and Democratization, in The Architecture of Democracy: Constitutional Design,onflict Management, and Democracy, A. Reynolds, Editor. 2002, Oxford University Press:

Oxford. p. 206-247.orris, P. Ballot Structures & Legislative Behavior. in Exporting Congress? The Influence of.S. Congress on World Legislatures. 2002. Gordon Institute for Public Policy and Citizenshiptudies, Florida International University, Miami, Florida.

orris, P. Electoral Engineering: Electoral Rules and Voting Choices. in 99th Annual Meeting ofhe American Political Science Association. 2003. Philadelphia, PA.

orris, P.A Comparative Perspective on Political Behaviour and Turnout . in CSES Plenaryession. 2003. Stockholm, Sweden.

orris, P. The new cleavage thesis and the social basis of radical right support. in 100th

nnual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. 2004. Chicago, IL.

orris, P.,Are Australian MPs in touch with constituents? 2004, Democratic Audit of Australia:ustralian National University, Canberra, Australia. p. 12.

orris, P., Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. 2004, New York:ambridge University Press.

orris, P. The "new cleavage" thesis and the social basis of radical right support. in 101stnnual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. 2005. Washington, DC.

orris, P., ed. Radical Right: Voters and Parties in the Electoral Market . 2005, Cambridgeniversity Press: New York, NY.

orris, P.,A tese da "nova clivagem" e a base social do apoio direita radical. Opinioblica, 2005. 11(1): p. 1-32.

orris, P. Fast Track Strategies for Achieving Women's Representation in Iraq and Afghanistan:hoices and Consequences. in 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Political Sciencessociation. 2006. Philadelphia, PA.

orris, P., Ballot Structures and Legislative Behavior: Changing Role Orientations via ElectoralReform, in Exporting Congress? The Influence of The U.S. Congress on World Legislatures,

.J. Power and N.C. Rae, Editors. 2006, University of Pittsburgh Press: Pittsburgh.


26/37

orris, P. Christian conservatism in global perspective: US exceptionalism (again)? in Thehristian Conservative Movement and American Society Conference. 2007. New York, NY.

orris, P., The Globalization of Comparative Public Opinion Research, in Sage Handbook ofomparative Politics, T. Landman and N. Robinson, Editors. 2009, Sage: London, UK. p. 522-40.

orris, P., Christian conservatism in global Perspective: US Exceptionalism (again)?, inhristian Conservatives and American Democracy, S. Brint and J.R. Schroedel, Editors. 2009,

Russell Sage: New York, N.Y.

orris, P. and R. Inglehart, Religious Parties and Electoral Behavior, in Sacred and Secular:Religion and Politics Worldwide. 2004, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge (UK). p. 352.

OECD, Society at a Glance: OECD Social Indicators. 2006 ed. 2007: OECD Publishing.

Ohr, D. and H. Oscarsson. Leader Traits, Leader Image and Vote Choice. in 2nd Generalonference of the European Consortium for Political Research 2003. Marburg, Germany.

Ohr, D. and H. Oscarsson, Leader Traits, Leader Image and Vote Choice, in Political Leaders

nd Democratic Elections, K. Aarts, A. Blais, and H. Schmitt, Editors. 2009, Oxford Universityress: Oxford

Orriols, L. The effect of social spending on vote choice in OECD countries. in 4th Generalonference of the European Consortium for Political Research. 2007. Pisa, Italy.

Ortega, C. Incentives to Organise Personal Campaigns in Preferential Voting Systems. in 18thWorld Congress of the International Political Science Association. 2000. Qubec City, Canada.

Ortega, C. Preferential Voting Systems and their Impact on the Personalization of Politics. inSES Conference and Planning Commmittee Meeting. 2006. Seville, Spain.

Oscarsson, H. Ideological Voting Under Different Institutional Contexts . in 2nd General

onference of the European Consortium for Political Research. 2003. Marburg, Germany.

aloheimo, H., ed. Vaalit ja demokratia Suomessa. 2005, WSOY: Helsinki.

askeviciute, A., The Role of Political Parties for Political System Support in Established andew Democracies, in Political Science. 2005, State University of New York at Binghamton:inghamton. p. 224.

askeviciute, A. Party Identification and System Legitimacy in Established and Newemocracies. in 64th Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. 2006.hicago, IL.

askeviciute, A. Party identification and system legitimacy in established and new democracies .n Nicosia 2006 ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops . 2006. Nicosia, Cyprus.

askeviciute, A. Partisanship and system support in comparative perspective. in 4th Generalonference of the European Consortium for Political Research. 2007. Pisa, Italy.

askeviciute, A. and C.J. Anderson. Political Party Behavior and Political Trust inontemporary Democracies. in 99th Annual Meeting of the American Political Sciencessociation. 2003. Philadelphia, PA.

askeviciute, A. and C.J. Anderson. Political parties, partisanship, and support for the political


27/37

ystem in established democracies. in 62nd Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Sciencessociation. 2004. Chicago, IL.

askeviciute, A. and M. Rosema. Political Cynicism and Electoral Choice. in 31st Annualcientific Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology. 2008. Paris.

attie, C.J. and R.J. Johnston, Party Knowledge and Candidate Knowledge: Constituencyampaigning and Voting and the 1997 British General Election. Electoral Studies, 2004. 23(4):. 795-819.

ersson, M., How Inequality Affects Political Engagement , inAnnual Scientific Meeting of theSSP. 2010: San Francisco, CA, USA.

ickup, M. Sifting through the endogeniety: How to measure the effect of a campaign poll withpoll. in 4th General Conference of the European Consortium for Political Research. 2007.isa, Italy.

op-Eleches, G., Throwing out the Bums: Protest Voting and Unorthodox Parties afterommunism. World Politics, 2010. 62(2): p. 221-260.

owell, G.B. The Ideological Congruence Controversy: The Impact of Alternativeonceptualizations and Data on the Effects of Election Rules . in 103rd Annual meeting of themerican Political Science Association. 2007. Chicago, IL.

owell, G.B. Changing Party System Polarization, Election Rules and Ideological Congruence .n 104th Annual Meeting ot the American Political Science Association. 2008. Boston, MA.

owell, G.B. Voter Diversity, Ideological Trends, and Changing Party System Polarization inWestern Democracies: Implications for Ideological Congruence. inAnnual Meeting of the

merican Political Science Association. 2009. Toronto, CA.

owell, G.B.J. Party System Change, Election Rules and Ideological Congruence . in 66thnnual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. 2008. Chicago, IL.

owell, G.B.J., The Ideological Congruence Controvery: The Impact of Alternative Measures,ata, and Time Periods on the Effects of Election Rules. Comparative Political Studies, 2009.2(12): p. 1475-1497.

Quinlan, S., Does 'Butskellism' contribute to a decline in youth electoral participation , inAnnualMeeting of the American Political Science Association. 2010. p. 34.

Rai, S. Political Participation and Voting Behavior: An Analysis of Motivating Factors for Votingn India and Bangladesh. in 18th World Congress of the International Political Sciencessociation. 2000. Qubec City, Canada.

Raymond, C. The Continued Salience of Religious Voting in the United States, Germany, andGreat Britain. in 67th Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. 2009.

hicago, IL.

Raymond, C., The continued salience of religious voting in the United States, Germany, andGreat Britain. Electoral Studies, forthcoming. In Press, Corrected Proof.

Rehm, P. and T. Reilly, United We Stand: Constituency Homogeneity and Comparative Partyolarization. Electoral Studies, 2010. 29(1): p. 40-53.

Renwick, A. Is There a Trend in the Direction of Electoral Reforms in Establishedemocracies? in 104th Annual Meeting ot the American Political Science Association. 2008.oston, MA.


28/37

Rico, G. Factors of voting personalization in Spanish elections, 1979-2004 . in CSESonference and Planning Commmittee Meeting. 2006. Seville, Spain.

Rose, R. and W. Mishler, How Do Electors Respond to an "Unfair" Election? The Experience ofRussians Post-Soviet Affairs, 2009. 25(2): p. 118-136.

Rosema, M. and C. De Vries. The Dual Nature of EU Issue Voting: The Impact of Europeanntegration in National and European Parliamentary Elections. in 4th General Conference of theuropean Consortium for Political Research. 2007. Pisa, Italy.

Rosema, M. and J. Thomassen.A Theory of Dual Partisanship . in 31st Annual ScientificMeeting of the International Society of Political Psychology . 2008. Paris.

Rosenstone, S.J., Planning Proceeds on the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, inCORE News. 1995.

Roteutscher, S., CDU-Wahl 2005: Katholiken, Kirchgnger und eine protestantischepitzenkandidatin aus dem Osten, in Die Bundestagswahl 2005: Analysen des Wahlkampfesnd der Wahlergebnisse, F. Brettschneider, O. Niedermayer, and B. Weels, Editors. 2007, VSerlag: Wiesbaden, Ger. p. 321-348.

Rudi, T. What kind of party identification does exist in emerging democracies in Central andastern Europe? in Nicosia 2006 ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops . 2006. Nicosia, Cyprus.

Rudi, T., Einstellungen zu Werten, Ideologien und Sachfragen als Determinanten desWahlverhaltens in Mittel- und Sdosteuropa, in Wahlen und Whler. Analysen aus Anlass der

undestagswahl 2005, O.W. Gabriel, B. Weels, and J.W. Falter, Editors. 2009, VS Verlag frozialwissenschaften: Wiesbaden.

altman, R.B., V. Bankauskaite, and K. Vraengbaeck, eds. Decentralization in European healthare systems. 2007, Open University Press/McGraw-Hill: Berkshire/New York.

amuels, D. Presidents, Assemblies, and Accountability. in 99th Annual Meeting of themerican Political Science Association. 2003. Philadelphia, PA.

amuels, D., The Initial Emergence of Mass Partisanship: Evidence from Brazil , in 4O Encontroacional da ABCP - Associao Brasileira de Cincia Poltica. 2004: Rio de Janeiro.

amuels, D., Sources of Mass Partisanship in Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society,006. 48(2): p. 1-27.

amuels, D., Sources of Mass Partisanship in Brazil, in Latin American Democraticransformations: Institutions, Actors, Processes, W.C. Smith, Editor. 2009, University of Miami:

Miami. p. 231-250.

apiro, V. Fifty Years of the National Election Studies: A Case Study in the History of "Bigocial Science". in 95th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. 1999.tlanta, GA.

apiro, V. and L.M. Bartels, The American National Election Studies: A Progress Report. PS:olitical Science and Politics, 1998. 31(1): p. 64-68.

auger, N.,Assessing the Accuracy of Polls for the French Presidential Election: The 2007xperience. French Politics, 2008. 6: p. 116-136.


29/37

carrow, H., The Impact of at-Large Elections: Vote Dilution, Choice Dilution and the VotingRights Act. Electoral Studies, 1999. 18(4): p. 557-567.

cheuch, E.K., History and visions in the development of data services for the social sciences.nternational Social Science Journal, 2003. 55(177): p. 385-399.

chmitt, H., Comparative Elections Research: International and European, in EURODATAewsletter. 1996. p. 1-5.

chmitt, H. Multiple Parteibindungen: Parteibindungen der Schweizerinnen und Schweizer im

nternationalen Vergleich. inAnnual Meeting of the Swiss Political Science Association. 2000.alsthal, Switzerland.

chmitt, H. Zur vergleichenden Analyse des Einflusses gesellschaftlicher Faktoren auf dasWahlverhalten: Forschungs-fragen, Anlysestrategien und einige Ergebnisse . in German

olitical Science Association Meeting. 2000. Mannheim, Germany.

chmitt, H., Zur vergleichenden Analyse des Einflusses gesellschaftlicher Faktoren auf dasWahlverhalten: Forschungsfragen, Anlysestrategien und einige Ergebnisse, in Wahlen undWhler. Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 1998, H.-D. Klingemann and M. Kaase,

ditors. 2001, Westdeutscher Verlag: Opladen (Ger). p. 621-644.

chmitt, H. Multiple Party Identifications. in Conference on the "Comparative Study of Electoralystems". 2002. WZB, Berlin, Germany.

chmitt, H. Political Parties, Left-Right-Orientations and the Vote in Germany and France. innternational Conference on "Elections and Democratic Governance", Institute of Political

cience, Academia Sinica (IPSAS). 2005. Taipei, Taiwan.

chmitt, H., Multiple Party Identification, in The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, H.-D.lingemann, Editor. 2009, Oxford University Press: Oxford. p. 137-157.

chmitt, H. and D. Ohr.Are Party Leaders Becoming More Important in German Elections?eader Effects on the Vote in Germany, 1961-1998 . in 96th Annual Meeting of the Americanolitical Science Association. 2000. Washington, DC.

chmitt, H. and B. Wessels, Meaningful Choices: Under which conditions do general electionsrovide a meaningful choice set, and what happens if they dont? 2003. p. 23.

eawright, J., The Demand Side of Party System Collapse: Political Preferences and Votesor Insurgent Parties. Workshop on the analysis of political cleavages and party competition,004.

elb, P.,A Deeper Look at the ProportionalityTurnout Nexus. Comparative Political Studies,009. 42(4): p. 527-548.

elway, J.S.A Socio-Institutional Theory of Public Goods Provision in 67th Annual Meeting ofhe Midwest Political Science Association 2009. Chicago, IL.

elway, J.S., Constitutions, Cleavages and Coordination: A Socio-Institutional Theory of PublicGoods Provision, in Political Science. 2009, University of Michigan: Ann Arbor. p. 237.

elway, J.S., Cross-Cuttingness, Cleavage Structures and Civil War Onset. British Journal ofolitical Science, 2010.

Date post:	14-Apr-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	kitty990
View:	229 times
Download:	0 times

Cses Bibliography

Documents