Date post: | 02-May-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | simonetta-lombardi |
View: | 223 times |
Download: | 2 times |
Paolo Verdecchia, F.A.C.C., F.E.S.C., F.A.H.A.Hospital of AssisiDepartment of MedicineVia Valentin Müller, 106081 - Assisi PGE-mail: [email protected]
DabigatranDabigatran
Simposio:Nuovi anticoagulanti orali: dai criteri di scelta all’esperienza sul campo
Simposio:Nuovi anticoagulanti orali: dai criteri di scelta all’esperienza sul campo
Conflict of Interest Disclosure
Travel grants/fee for membership on Advisory Committees and speaking at scientific meetings:
• Boehringer-Inghelheim• Bayer• Daiichi-Sankyo• Stroder
Travel grants/fee for membership on Advisory Committees and speaking at scientific meetings:
• Boehringer-Inghelheim• Bayer• Daiichi-Sankyo• Stroder
No honorarium for today’s talkNo honorarium for today’s talk
DabigatranDabigatran
1. Lo studio RE-LY
2. Le indagini della Food and
Drug Administration (FDA)
3. L’esperienza di Assisi
1. Lo studio RE-LY
2. Le indagini della Food and
Drug Administration (FDA)
3. L’esperienza di Assisi
DabigatranDabigatran
1. Lo studio RE-LY
2. Le indagini della Food and
Drug Administration (FDA)
3. L’esperienza di Assisi
1. Lo studio RE-LY
2. Le indagini della Food and
Drug Administration (FDA)
3. L’esperienza di Assisi
ParametroParametro RELYRELYN = 18 113N = 18 113
ROCKET-AFROCKET-AFN = 14 264N = 14 264
ARISTOTLEARISTOTLEN = 18 201N = 18 201
ENGAGE-AFENGAGE-AFN = 21 105N = 21 105
Disegno dello Disegno dello studio:studio:
Multicentrico (951 centri), randomizzato, warfarin in aperto, dabigatran in doppia cecità (PROBE)
Multicentrico (1178 centri), randomizzato, doppia cecità, double dummy
Multicentrico (1030 centri), randomizzato, doppia cecità, double dummy
Multicentrico (1393 centri), randomizzato, doppia cecità, double dummy
DoseDose Dabigatran: 110 mg b.i.d.; 150 mg b.i.d.
Rivaroxaban: 20 mg o.d.(15 mg o.d. se VFG 30-49 cc/min)
Apixaban: 5 mg b.i.d.(2.5 mg o.d. se età > 80, peso <60 o creatininemia> 1.5 mg/dl)
Edoxaban: 60 mg od; 30 mg od. Dosi dimezzate se: VFG 30-50; peso <60, verapamil e/o chinidina
Endpoint Endpoint primarioprimario
Composito di ictus (ischemico / emorragico) ed embolia sistemica
Composito di ictus (ischemico / emorragico) ed embolia sistemica
Composito di ictus (ischemico ed emorragico) ed embolia sistemica
Composito di ictus (ischemico ed emorragico) ed embolia sistemica
Durata follow-Durata follow-upup
2.0 anni (mediana) 1.8 anni (mediana) 1.9 anni (mediana) 2.8 anni (mediana)
Endpoint Endpoint primario di primario di sicurezzasicurezza
Sanguinamenti maggiori (inclusi i sanguinamenti pericolosi per la vita e quelli fatali)
Composito di sanguinamenti maggiori e non maggiori clinicamente rilevanti
Sanguinamenti maggiori (criteri ISTH)
Sanguinamenti maggiori (criteri ISTH)
Età (anni)Età (anni) 71.5 (media) 73 (mediana) 70 (mediana) 72 (mediana)
CHADSCHADS22
ScoreScore2.1 3.5 2.1 2.8
TTR (medio%)TTR (medio%) 64 55 62 65
Analisi Analisi statisticastatistica
Intention to treat • Per protocol• Intention to treat
Intention to treat • Per protocol• Intention to treat
BID = 1 somministrazione ogni 12 ore
Connolly SJ et al. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1875–6 6
Anni di osservazione0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.05
0.04
Ris
chio
cu
mu
lati
vo
0.00
WarfarinDabigatran
110 mg BID
Dabigatran 150 mg BID
Dabigatran 150 mg BIDvs. warfarin: HR 0.65(95% CI: 0.52–0.81)Non inferiorità: p<0.001 Superiorità: p<0.001
Dabigatran 150 mg BID vs warfarin: -35%
RE-LY: stroke or systemic embolismDabigatran 110 mg BID vs. warfarin: RR 0.90 (95% CI: 0.74–1.10)Non inferiorità: p<0.001Superiorità: p=0.30
Dabigatran 110 mg BID vs warfarin: -10%
Ischaemic StrokeIschaemic Stroke
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4-24% vs warfarin
P=0.03
1.34 0.92 1.21
WarfarinDabigatran150 mg
Dabigatran110 mg
p = 0.42p = 0.42
0.97 1.05
p = 0.581p = 0.5811.32 1.42
N Engl J Med 2010;363:1875–6N Engl J Med 2010;363:1875–6N Engl J Med 2011;365:883-91N Engl J Med 2011;365:883-91
N Engl J Med 2011;365:981-92N Engl J Med 2011;365:981-92
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1,4
1,6
1,8
2
WarfarinEdoxaban30 mg
Edoxaban60 mg
1.25 1.77 1.25
N Engl J Med 2013;369:2093-104N Engl J Med 2013;369:2093-104
+41% vs warfarinP<0.001
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
RE-LY ROCKET-AF ARISTOTLE ENGAGE-AF
WarfarinDabigatran 150 mg
Dabigatran 110 mg ApixabanRivaroxaban Edoxaban 30 mg
Edoxaban 60 mg
Haemorragic Stroke in RE-LY, ROCKET AF, ARISTOTLE, ENGAGE AF
0.760.76
0.100.100.120.12
0.440.44
0.260.26
0.470.47
0.240.24
0.470.47
0.260.26
Rate(x 100
patientsper
year)
Rate(x 100
patientsper
year)
HR 0.26p<0.001
HR 0.51p<0.001
HR 0.33p<0.001
HR 0.54p<0.001
0.160.16
HR 0.59p=0.024
HR 0.31p<0.001
Intracranial bleeding is less with dabigatran than with warfarin at any level
of cTTR
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9
1
Dabigatran 110mg BID
Dabigatran 150mg BID
Warfarin
< 57.1%< 57.1% 57.1-65.5%57.1-65.5% 65.5-72.6%65.5-72.6% > 72.6%> 72.6%cTTR:cTTR:
Rate ofintracranial
bleeding(per 100patients
per year)
Rate ofintracranial
bleeding(per 100patients
per year)
cTTR < 57.1%D 110 mg vs warfarin: HR 0.43 (0.19-1.00)D 150 mg vs warfarin: HR 0.53 (0.25-1.15)cTTR 57.1-65.5%D 110 mg vs warfarin: HR 0.31 (0.15-0.66)D 150 mg vs warfarin: HR 0.45 (0.24-0.88)cTTR 65.5-72.5%D 110 mg vs warfarin: HR 0.20 (0.07-0.58)D 150 mg vs warfarin: HR 0.35 (0.15-0.82)cTTR > 72.6%D 110 mg vs warfarin: HR 0.27 (0.11-0.66)D 150 mg vs warfarin: HR 0.39 (0.18-0.84)
cTTR < 57.1%D 110 mg vs warfarin: HR 0.43 (0.19-1.00)D 150 mg vs warfarin: HR 0.53 (0.25-1.15)cTTR 57.1-65.5%D 110 mg vs warfarin: HR 0.31 (0.15-0.66)D 150 mg vs warfarin: HR 0.45 (0.24-0.88)cTTR 65.5-72.5%D 110 mg vs warfarin: HR 0.20 (0.07-0.58)D 150 mg vs warfarin: HR 0.35 (0.15-0.82)cTTR > 72.6%D 110 mg vs warfarin: HR 0.27 (0.11-0.66)D 150 mg vs warfarin: HR 0.39 (0.18-0.84)
Wallentin L et al. Lancet 2010;376:975–83
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
RE-LY ROCKET-AF ARISTOTLE ENGAGE-AF
WarfarinDabigatran 150 mg
Dabigatran 110 mg ApixabanRivaroxaban Edoxaban 30 mg
Edoxaban 60 mg
Major Bleedings in RE-LY, ROCKET AF, ARISTOTLE, ENGAGE AF
3.573.57
3.313.31
2.872.87
3.453.453.603.60
3.093.09
2.132.13
3.433.43
2.752.75
1.611.61
Rate(x 100
patientsper
year)
Rate(x 100
patientsper
year)
HR 0.81p=0.002
HR 0.71p<0.001
HR 0.53p<0.001
HR 0.80p<0.001
Lower with dabigatran 110 mg, apixaban and both doses of edoxaban versus warfarinLower with dabigatran 110 mg, apixaban and both doses of edoxaban versus warfarin
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
RE-LY ROCKET-AF ARISTOTLE ENGAGE-AF
WarfarinDabigatran 150 mg
Dabigatran 110 mg ApixabanRivaroxaban Edoxaban 30 mg
Edoxaban 60 mg
Gastrointestinal Bleedings in RE-LY, ROCKET AF, ARISTOTLE, ENGAGE AF
1.251.25
1.851.85
1.361.36
1.121.12
1.621.62
0.860.860.760.76
1.231.23
1.511.51
Rate(x 100
patientsper
year)
Rate(x 100
patientsper
year)
HR 1.49p<0.001
HR 0.89P=0.37
HR 0.67p<0.001
HR 1.23P=0.03
0.820.82
HR 1.45 P<0.05
HR 1.09P=0.44
Lower only with edoxaban 30 mg versus warfarinLower only with edoxaban 30 mg versus warfarin
Higher with dabigatran 150 mg, rivaroxaban and edoxaban 60 mg versus warfarinHigher with dabigatran 150 mg, rivaroxaban and edoxaban 60 mg versus warfarin
Quindi, rispetto al warfarin, il dabigatran:
• Riduce significativamente l’end-point primario e l’ictus ischemico (150 mg), o è equivalente al warfarin (110 mg)
• Riduce drasticamente le emorragie endocraniche e l’ictus emorragico (110 mg e 150 mg)
• Riduce significativamente le emorragie maggiori (110 mg), o è equivalente al warfarin (150 mg)
• Aumenta le emorragie gastrointestinali (150 mg), o è equivalente al warfarin (110 mg)
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Apix
D150
RivaED60
Warf
ED30
D110
D150
ED60Apix Riva D110
Warf
ED30
Stroke/Systemic Embolism Stroke
Ischaemic Stroke Death
D150
ED60Apix
Riva
D110
Warf
ED30
D150ED60
Apix
Riva
D110
Warf
ED30
Apixaban (Apix) Dabigatran (D)
110 mg150 mg
Edoxaban (ED)
30 mg60 mg
Rivaroxaban (Riva) Warfarin (Warf)
Pro
ba
bili
ty o
f e
ach
ra
nk
Pro
ba
bili
ty o
f e
ach
ra
nk
Pro
ba
bili
ty o
f e
ach
ra
nk
Pro
ba
bili
ty o
f e
ach
ra
nk
Verdecchia P, Lip GYH, et al. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014 Oct 14:1-14. [Epub ahead of print]
Verdecchia P, Lip GYH, et al. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014 Oct 14:1-14. [Epub ahead of print]
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
ApixD150
Riva
ED60
Warf
ED30
D110
D150
ED60
Apix
RivaD110
Warf
ED30 Major Bleeding Intracranial Bleeding
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Myocardial Infarction
D150ED60
Apix Riva
D110
Warf
ED30
D150
ED60
Apix
Riva
D110
WarfED30
Apixaban (Apix) Dabigatran (D)
110 mg150 mg
Edoxaban (ED)
30 mg60 mg
Rivaroxaban (Riva) Warfarin (Warf)
Pro
ba
bili
ty o
f e
ach
ra
nk
Pro
ba
bili
ty o
f e
ach
ra
nk
Pro
ba
bili
ty o
f e
ach
ra
nk
Pro
ba
bili
ty o
f e
ach
ra
nk
Verdecchia P, Lip GYH, et al. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014 Oct 14:1-14. [Epub ahead of print]
Verdecchia P, Lip GYH, et al. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014 Oct 14:1-14. [Epub ahead of print]
DabigatranDabigatran
1. Lo studio RE-LY
2. Le indagini della Food and
Drug Administration (FDA)
3. L’esperienza di Assisi
1. Lo studio RE-LY
2. Le indagini della Food and
Drug Administration (FDA)
3. L’esperienza di Assisi
Event(x 100 patient-years)
Dabigatran(N=67 207)
Warfarin (reference)
(N=67207)
Adjusted HR (95% CI)
Ischemic stroke 1.13 1.39 0.80 (0.67-0.96)
Intracranial hemorrhage
0.33 0.96 0.34 (0.26-0.46)
Major Gastrointestinal bleeding
3,42 2,65 1.28 (1.14-1.44)
Acute Myocardial Infarction
1,57 1,69 0.92 (0.78-1.08)
Death 3,26 3,78 0.86 (0.77-0.96)
Event Rates with Dabigatran (75 mg or 150 mg bid) vs Warfarin in 134 000 patients with AF aged ≥ 65 years
Graham DJ et asl. Circulation 2014; October 30Graham DJ et asl. Circulation 2014; October 30
Graham DJ et asl. Circulation 2014; October 30Graham DJ et asl. Circulation 2014; October 30
-20%Adjusted HR:0.80 (0.67-0.96); p=0.02
-20%Adjusted HR:0.80 (0.67-0.96); p=0.02
-66%Adjusted HR:0.34 (0.26-0.46); p<0.001
-66%Adjusted HR:0.34 (0.26-0.46); p<0.001 -14%
Adjusted HR0.86 (0.77-0.96); p=0.006
-14%Adjusted HR0.86 (0.77-0.96); p=0.006
+28%Adjusted HR:1.28 (1.14-1.44); p=0.006
+28%Adjusted HR:1.28 (1.14-1.44); p=0.006
DabigatranDabigatran
1. Lo studio RE-LY
2. Le indagini della Food and
Drug Administration (FDA)
3. L’esperienza di Assisi
1. Lo studio RE-LY
2. Le indagini della Food and
Drug Administration (FDA)
3. L’esperienza di Assisi
L’esperienza di AssisiL’esperienza di Assisi
Maria Gabriella Molini Francesca Valecchi Paolo VerdecchiaClaudia Bartolini Adolfo Aita
Letizia Di GiacomoStefania Martone
Maria Gabriella Molini Francesca Valecchi Paolo VerdecchiaClaudia Bartolini Adolfo Aita
Letizia Di GiacomoStefania Martone
www.umbriafa.itwww.umbriafa.it
Number 115
Age (years) 78.3 (8)
Weight (Kg) 75.6 (13)
Height (cm) 166.3 (10)
Sex (% women) 53Classification of AF (N, %) - New-onset 24 (21%) - Paroxysmal 12 (10%) - Persistent 30 (26%) - Permanent 49 (43%)
Main Characteristics of Patients (1)
Verdecchia P et al. Curr Op Drug Saf 2014 (in press)Verdecchia P et al. Curr Op Drug Saf 2014 (in press)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
CHA2DS2VASc GroupCHA2DS2VASc Group
Per centof
Patients
Distribution of CHA2DS2VASc
1010
28283131
1616
1010
33 11
Verdecchia P et al. Curr Op Drug Saf 2014 (in press)Verdecchia P et al. Curr Op Drug Saf 2014 (in press)
21%21%
18%18%
9%9%
52%52%
Terapie antitrombotiche/antiaggreganti assunte in precedenza
Terapie antitrombotiche/antiaggreganti assunte in precedenza
WarfarinWarfarin
NullaNulla
EparinaEparina
AspirinaAspirina
Verdecchia P et al. Curr Op Drug Saf 2014 (in press)Verdecchia P et al. Curr Op Drug Saf 2014 (in press)
Sospeso Continuato
Sospensione Definitiva Trattamento
N = 97(84%)
N = 18(16%)
Sospensione definitiva by Dabigatran dose:11 su 76 pazienti (14%) con Dabigatran 110 mg7 su 39 pazienti (18%) con Dabigatran 150 mg
Sospensione definitiva:In media, 76 giorni dopo l’inizio del trattamento
Cause sospensione definitiva:
• Distress epigastrico: 10 pazienti
• Sanguinamento GI: 1 paziente
• VFG < 30 ml/min: 3 pazienti• Prurito intenso: 1
paziente• By pass aorto-coronarico: 2 pazienti• Polmonite: 1
paziente
Totale 18 pazienti
Totale: 115 pazienti
Dopo la sospensione:Warfarin: 7 pazienti;Altro NAO: 7 pazientiNé anticoagulanti né ASA: 4 pazienti
Verdecchia P et al. Curr Op Drug Saf 2014 (in press)Verdecchia P et al. Curr Op Drug Saf 2014 (in press)
Tollerabilità
Distress epigastrico
Diarrea
Sanguinamenti Minori
Sanguinamenti Maggiori
Assente(N=90)
Presente(N=2521,7%) Assente
(N=106)
Presenti(N=9; 7,8%)
Assente(N=112)
Presente(N=32,6%)
Assenti(N=113)
Presenti(N=2;1,7%)
Verdecchia P et al. Curr Op Drug Saf 2014 (in press)Verdecchia P et al. Curr Op Drug Saf 2014 (in press)
A che punto siamo con l’antidoto ?
A che punto siamo con l’antidoto ?
Sept 2014
Idarucizumab An Antidote Specific to Dabigatran
Restoration of coagulation Potent binding affinity ~350 times
higher than the binding of dabigatran to thrombin
No procoagulant or anticoagulant effects
Short half-life
Easy and rapid administration IV administration, immediate onset of
action
Low risk of adverse reactions– No Fc receptor binding– No endogenous targets
Idarucizumab is currently in development and is not approved for use in any country. The information presented here is intended for medical education purposes only
Glund S et al. AHA 2013; abstract 17765; van Ryn J. AHA 2012; Presentation 9928; van Ryn J et al. Circulation 2012;126:A9928
Fully humanized antibody fragment
(Fab)
Fully humanized antibody fragment
(Fab)
Sept 2014
Healthy volunteer study: immediate, complete, and sustained reversal of dabigatran anticoagulation
Idarucizumab is currently in development and is not approved for use in any country. The information presented here is intended for medical education purposes only ‘Normal upper reference limit’ refers to (mean+2SD) of 86 predose measurements from a total of 51 subjects
Glund S et al. AHA 2013; abstract 17765
Dabigatran plus:Placebo (n=9)1 g idarucizumab (day 4) (n=9)2 g idarucizumab (day 4) (n=9)4 g idarucizumab (day 4) (n=8)Normal upper reference limit (n=86)Mean baseline (n=86)
29
End of idarucizumab injection (5 min infusion)
Dabigatran + placebo
–2
Time after end of infusion (hours)
dTT (
s)
DabigatranAntidote
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 24 36 48 7260
Sept 2014
First patient trial of a NOAC-specific antidote
Study to evaluate reversal of the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran with idarucizumab in:
Bleeding patients – overt bleeding judged by the physician to require a reversal agent
Surgical patients – require an emergency surgery or procedure for a condition other than bleeding
Idarucizumab is currently in development and is not approved for use in any country. The information presented here is intended for medical education purposes onlyNCT02104947: Available at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02104947; Accessed August 2014
30
Started in April 2014, currently recruiting in >35 countries worldwide
Grazie per la vostra attenzione
Grazie per la vostra attenzione
2.8
4.84.6
6.3
2.6
4.4 4.3
5.5
2.2
3.93.8
5.4
Rateof
MajorBleeding
(% peryear)
Concomitant Use of Antiplatelet Therapy with Dabigatran or Warfarin
Dans M et al. Circulation 2013;127:634-640
Of 18 113 patients, 6952 (38.4%) received concomitant aspirin or clopidogrel, or both, at some time during the study (in 1 out of 5 for the total study duration).
Graham DJ et asl. Circulation 2014; October 30Graham DJ et asl. Circulation 2014; October 30
La dose 150 mg bid (pazienti con VFG > 30 ml/min) è migliore del warfarin per ictus ischemico, emorragie endocraniche e mortalità, e peggiore del warfarin per emorragie gastrointestinali
La dose 150 mg bid (pazienti con VFG > 30 ml/min) è migliore del warfarin per ictus ischemico, emorragie endocraniche e mortalità, e peggiore del warfarin per emorragie gastrointestinali
La dose 75 mg bid (pazienti con VFG < 30 ml/min) è equivalente al warfarin per ictus ischemico, sanguinamenti GI e mortalità, ma pur sempre migliore del warfarin per emorragie endocraniche
La dose 75 mg bid (pazienti con VFG < 30 ml/min) è equivalente al warfarin per ictus ischemico, sanguinamenti GI e mortalità, ma pur sempre migliore del warfarin per emorragie endocraniche
Drug-safety investigation, focused on the occurrence of bleeding, promoted by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) over the period October 19, 2010 to December 31, 2011.
Limitations1. Lack of adjustment for confounders2. Lack of detailed medical records review
Limitations1. Lack of adjustment for confounders2. Lack of detailed medical records review
Southworth MR et al. N Engl J Med 2013Southworth MR et al. N Engl J Med 2013
Effect of Dabigatran Plasma Concentrations and Patient Characteristics on Ischemic Stroke
and Major Bleeding in AF Patients
Effect of Dabigatran Plasma Concentrations and Patient Characteristics on Ischemic Stroke
and Major Bleeding in AF Patients
Reilly PA et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:321–8Reilly PA et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:321–8
Italia:60.600.000 individui
Umbria:897.000 individui(1,5% della popolazioneItaliana)
2.730/135.000piani terapeutici = 2.0%(rispetto ad 1,5% atteso)