+ All Categories
Home > Documents > URBAN AGE ISTANBUL CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 2009• 1996: Transport Department of GNCTD commissions a...

URBAN AGE ISTANBUL CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 2009• 1996: Transport Department of GNCTD commissions a...

Date post: 29-Feb-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
35
URBAN AGE ISTANBUL CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 2009 Geetam Tiwari Indian Institute of Technology New Green Transport Infrastructure in Delhi All rights are reserved by the presenter www.urban-age.net
Transcript

URBAN AGE ISTANBUL CONFERENCE

NOVEMBER 2009

Geetam Tiwari

Indian Institute of Technology

New Green Transport Infrastructure in Delhi

All rights are reserved by the presenter

www.urban-age.net

Geetam Tiwari

Transportation Research and Injury Prevention Program (TRIPP)/ Civil Engineering Department

Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) New Delhi, India

NEW GREEN TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE DELHI TRANSIT

1996-2008

Understanding traffic chaos, congestion, accidents in Delhi

• Captive users of NMVs & PT

• Painted side bus lane occupied by NMVs and pedestrians

• Mismatch between road design and usage

• Poor utilization of space(~50%)

• 3 lane wide road is used as 2 lane road

Why BRT?

Short term:

Congestion free movement to majority people

Improve safety and convenience of PT users, pedestrians and bicyclists

Move out buses from congestion

Current modal shares can be maintained

(~30:30:30, NMV:PT:PRSVEH)

long term

increase in PT, pedestrians and bicyclists is possible

DELHI BRT PLANNING • 1996: Transport Department of GNCTD commissions a study after “Delhi on the Move 2005“ report for CPCB

• 1998: Study submitted to GNCTD indicating exclusive bicycle lanes are

required on all arterial roads to improve flow and safety of all. Designs for Vikas Marg and Wazirabad corridors prepared.

(DMRC construction is underway since 2006 on this corridor)

• 2002 (JANUARY): DTC, IDFC, SIAM organise an International Workshop .A consensus emerged that Delhi should plan for BRT corridors in Delhi.(Objection from Traffic Police)

• 2002 (MAY): Chief Minister GNTCD appoints a Committee ;Chief Secretary as Chairperson to examine all possible options for planning for sustainable transport in Delhi.

• 2002 (SEPT): Committee submits report and recommends that dedicated central lanes be established public transport on six corridors of Delhi.

• 2004: Contract awarded to RITES to prepare detailed plans for BRT for six corridors with construction details for the first corridor. Order placed for first 6 low floor buses for Delhi.

• (Alignment of 4 corridor has changed since then and DIMTS has prepared concept plan for LRT, and monorail as well)

• 2005: Transport Department (GNCTD) organises an international workshop to examine design details for the first corridor. The national and international experts review the details and examine the corridor and their suggestions are incorporated in the designs.

• 2006: GNTCD establishes Delhi Integrated Multi-Modal Transit System (DIMTS), a Special Purpose Vehicle to oversee the establishment of public transport systems in Delhi.

• 2006 (Oct): Construction of the first corridor starts.

• 2006-2007: All details of the project examined by EPCA in several meetings with all stakeholders and suggestions incorporated.

• 6 km corridor operating since April 2008

7 Major Activities to create a system

Delhi HCBS/ BRT

Road Infrastructure Physical Inventory Traffic Inventory Rd X section Bus Stops Junctions

Vehicle Specs, report submitted to Transport department 2003

I.T. Services Institutional

Financial

Social Marketing Capacity Building, workshops with vehicle manufacturers, Traffic police, MCD engineers

Planning completed for6 corridors, 14.5 km to be completed in 2008 August

6 Telco Buses Ordered 2004, 5000 in 2007

DIMTS formed in 2007 March

DIMTS& DTC invited tenders for passenger information services

Meeting with RWAs Meeting with MLAs Meeting with print media

Universal Design VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS

IIT Delhi January 08

Low Floor Buses first time in the country 2006

IIT Delhi January 08

BRT CORRIDORS IN DELHI

HCBS Phase 1 Ambedkar Nagar to

ISBT

S. No.

Section Length in km

4 way junction

T junction

Ped. subway

Flyover Bus shelter

(both direction

1 Ambedkar Nagar-Chiragh Delhi

2.9 1 3 - - 12

2 Chiragh Delhi-Sirifort

1.5 1 - 1 1 3

3 Sirifort-Moolcnd 1.4 1 1 1 1 6

4 Moolchand – Lodhi Road

3.2 1 - 1 1 9

5. Lodhi Road – Tila Bridge

3.7 1 5 2 2 14

6. Tilak Bridge – Delhi Gate

1.6 2 1 (U turn)

- - 6

7. Delhi Gate-ISBT

3.7 5 2 2 - 8

TENDER PROCESS

2005 : 6km

2006 : Approved section (Ambd.Ngr to Delhi Gate)

Ambedkar Nagar to ISBT(19 km)

AMBEDKAR NAGAR

CHIRAGH DELHI

ORTHONOVA

PRESS ENCLAVE

SIRI FORT ROAD MOOLCHAND

LODHI ROAD

TILAK BRIDGE

DELHI GATE

SHAHEED PARKITO

BHAIRON ROAD

PURANABHAGWAN

SHERSHAH ROAD

ANDREWS GANJ LAJPAT NAGAR

DEFENCE COLONYJANGPURA

BHARTI MARGSUBRAMANYAM

MATHURA ROAD

DAS ROADQUILA ROAD

CS1CS2

CS3

CS4 CS5CS6

CS7

CS8

CS9

CS10

JAMA MASZIDRED FORT

ANSARI ROAD

GPOSP MARG

TELEPHONE EXCHANGE

ST.JAMES CHURCHKASMERE GATE ISBT

CS13

CS14

CS12

GOLCHA

Ist BRT in INDIA

27th September

2006

AN junction 2005 120 buses/h

A.N.Junction 2008 2 bus platforms (near side of junction) capacity:TU of 10 vehicles,at

grade crossing

Line capacity: 9000 prs/h Peak demand: 6000 prs/h

Bicycle lanes

IIT Delhi January 08

Bicycle lane and Midblock bus shelter (single platform)

~1200 bicycles/h

At grade pedestrian crossing

DETAILED DESIGN FEATURES

WIDE BARRIER FREE PEDESTRIAN INFRASTRUCTURE

Cycle Tracks

• Continuous Concrete Tracks

• Adjacent to MV lanes • Raised by 75 to 100mm

above road level • Physically segregated

from MV lanes and pedestrian path

• Tree belt provide shade

Cycle Track

• Raised crossing established cyclist and pedestrian priority at un-signalized junctions

• Textured ramps for vehicles – different surface treatment at crossing

Bus Stations Access to the Bus

• Defined boarding gates with warning tiles

Buses Inside the Bus

• Space to park wheelchairs with provision of special belt to secure during journey

Traffic Safety

1.4, 15%

3.2, 35%

4.6, 50%

Yearly Average Fatalities Before Construction on 5.8km Stretch of

BRT Corridor, Delhi

CyclistsMotoristPedestrian

0, 0% 0, 0%

6, 100%

Yearly Average Fatalities After Construction on 5.8km Stretch of

BRT Corridor, Delhi

CyclistsMotoristPedestrian

No. of Accidents post installation of rumble strips in bus lane – “ZERO”

0

3

0 0

1

2 2

0

1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1

0 0

2

0

3

5

2

4

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0123456

020406080100120140

No.

of S

peed

ing

Inci

dent

s

Comparison Between Accidents and Bus Speeding on BRTS Corridor, Delhi

Fatal AccidentsMajor AccidentsMore than 70 Km/hr60-70 Km/hr50-60 Km/hr

Installation of rumble strips –

Source - Dario Hidalgo, Madhav Pai; Embarq

Source - Dario Hidalgo, Madhav Pai; Embarq

Delhi BRT Traffic May 2009

• 200 buses • 15,000

persons • 1500

bicycles • Bus speed

20km/h • Car speed • 15 m/h

Source - Dario Hidalgo, Madhav Pai; Embarq

15000

Source - Dario Hidalgo, Madhav Pai; Embarq

21

Media Reports

• 2002-2006(november) “…why has the project been delayed?”

• 2007May-2008 May “…BRT-Big Road Trauma”

• Mis-reporting of design details • High lighting inconvenience during

construction • Sensationalizing fatal accidents

IIT Delhi May 15

Central Bus Lanes in Delhi

NAPM march for “Equal right campaign on road”

IIT Delhi 2003

Impacts

Short Term

Bus speed 20km/h, car 12-15 km/h

Urban rejuvenation – landscaping and beautification of complete corridor benefiting all residents

Whole corridor made accessible to disabled people as required by law

Zero Fatal Accidents January 2009-october 2009

IIT Delhi 2003

Impacts

LongTerm

Increase in PT users because Bus speed 20km/h, car 12-15 km/h

Increase in pedestrian and bicycle trips because of safe network

Reduction in vehicular emissions because of smoother driving cycle

Reduction in GHGs because of high share of low carbon modes of transport

GREEN TRANSPORT AGENDA

• CNG in Public Transport: Initial outcry Bus travel becomes expensive and fleet size

reduces • Metro : Strong support from media PT becomes expensive, poor household

relocated • BRT: Strong opposition from media Bus travels faster than car, car lanes congested

Delhi Climate Policy

• Description of projects

• Metro extension • BUS

corporatisation • AFCS • Flyovers, ROBs,

RUBs • Street lighting

Possible Impact on CO2 (woodcock J et al, Accepted in Lancet, 2009)

London Population London Delhi 2006 = 7.5m 2030 = 9.0m

Delhi Population

2004 = 14.8m

2030 = 26.0m Aggregate Transport CO2 Emissions

Transport CO2 Emissions Per Person (tCO2/ person)

CO2 Emissions Reduction on 1990 (%)

Aggregate Transport CO2 Emissions

Transport CO2 Emissions Per Person (tCO2/ person)

CO2 Emissions Increase on 1990 (%)

(tonnes)

2006 London 2004 Delhi

9,647,900 1.3 -2.50% 6,146,651 0.4 97% 2010 BAU 9,935,897 1.3 0% 8,268,298 0.5 165% 2030 Scenario 1 BAU

10,381,318 1.2 4.80% 19,550,693 0.8 526% 2030 Scenario 2 LCD

6,480,565 0.7 -39% 17,069,668 0.7 447% 2030 Scenario 3 AT

6,120,306 0.7 -43% 10,458,736 0.4 235% 2030 Scenario 4 ST

3,608,226 0.4 -65% 9,327,207 0.4 199%


Recommended