District Watershed Development Unit -...

District Watershed Development Unit- Porbandar

1


2

:Contents :

Table no.1: Basic project information ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Table no.2: Weightage of the project ........................................................................................................................................ 8 Table no.3: Watershed information ........................................................................................................................................ 12 Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area: ................................................................................... 12 Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area: ....................................................................................... 10 Table no. 6: PIA: ..................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: ................................................................................................................................................ 19 Table no. 8: Land use pattern: ................................................................................................................................................ 20 Table no. 9: Soil type and topography: ................................................................................................................................... 22 Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition: ............................................................................................................................ 23 Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion .................................................................................................................................................... 23 Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) ......................................................................................................... 24 Table no. 11.3: Waterlogging Conditions ............................................................................................................................... 24 Table no. 12: Climatic conditions: ........................................................................................................................................... 25 Table no. 13: Physiography and relief .................................................................................................................................... 25 Table no. 14: Land ownership details ..................................................................................................................................... 25 Table no. 15: Agriculture ......................................................................................................................................................... 27 Table no. 16: Irrigation ............................................................................................................................................................ 29 Table no. 17: Crop details: ...................................................................................................................................................... 30 Table no. 18: Livestock ........................................................................................................................................................... 32


3

Table no. 19: Drinking water ................................................................................................................................................... 33 Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources .......................................................................................................... 34 Table no. 21: Demographic information ................................................................................................................................. 38 Table no. 22: Literacy rate ...................................................................................................................................................... 39 Table no. 23: Migration details................................................................................................................................................ 39 Table no. 24: Poverty .............................................................................................................................................................. 41 Table no. 25: Village infrastructure ......................................................................................................................................... 41 Table no. 26 : Facilities / HH assets ....................................................................................................................................... 43 Table no. 27: Income .............................................................................................................................................................. 44 Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR ............................................................................................................................. 44 Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) .................................................................................................. 45 Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects* ............................................................................ 46 Table no. 31: Watershed Committee details ............................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. Table no. 32: SHG detail ........................................................................................................................................................ 69 Table no. 33: UG detail ........................................................................................................................................................... 69 Table no.34: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) ............................................................................ 73 Table no.35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) ...................................................... 84 Table no.36: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ..................... Table no.37: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) 93 Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas ........................................... 97 Table no. 39: Other activities of watershed works phase – Proposed target ....................................................................... 100 Table no.40: Details of engineering structures in watershed works* ................................................................................... 100


4

Table no.41: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works ............................................................ Table no.42: Details of allied / other activities ...................................................................................................................... 106 Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas ........................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution: .......................................................................................................................... 112 Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan: ................................................................................................................................... 113 Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities: ................................................................................... 113 Table no. 47: Village wise- activity wise budget ................................................................................................................... 116 Table no. 48: Budget at a glance .......................................................................................................................................... 117 Table no.49: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes ................................................................................... 118 Table no. 50: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects* .......................................................................................... 119 Table no. 51: Employment in Project area: .......................................................................................................................... 119 Table no. 52: Details of seasonal migration from Project area ............................................................................................ 122 Table no. 53: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters) ............................................... 122 Table no. 54: Status of Drinking water* ................................................................................................................................ 124 Table no. 55: Details of Kharif crop area and yield in the project areas ............................................................................... 125 Table no. 56: Area under horticulture ................................................................................................................................... 126 Table no. 57: Forest/vegetative cover ................................................................................................................................. 126 Table no. 58: Details of livestock in the project areas * (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.) ................................................................................................................................................................ 127 Table no. 59: Backward-Forward linkages ........................................................................................................................... 128


5


6

1.1 Project Background (IWMP-1) Kadegi project is located in Kutiyana Taluka, Porbandar District of Gujarat state. The project is a cluster

of 6 micro-watersheds with 5G1B1b1a, 5G1A6a2e, 5G1C1b1b, 5G1A5b1a, 5G1A6a2e, 5G1A6a2e being their respective codes. The total project area of the watershed is about 5853.11 Ha, of which has been undertaken to be treated under Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) starting year 2009-10.

The watershed includes three Villages Mer, Patel ,SC & Bharmin are the primary inhabitants of the village. The livelihood of these people is primarily based on rainfed agriculture, animal husbandry, wage labour, goat and sheep rearing.

The Project area falls under the IWDP according to DoLR Classification. It is a very poor and desolate village on the border of Porbandar. The Kadegi Project was heavily Every year Flood. This has resulted in Productivity of Agriculture Land was too low camper another villages of Kutiyana Block.

Table no.1: Basic project information

Sl No.

Name of the project

Villages Gram

Panchayats Taluka District Area of the project

Area proposed

to be treated

Total project

cost PIA Name Census

code

1

IWMP-1

Junej (00798000) Junej

KUTIYANA

PORBANDAR 496.6 496.6 5959200 DWDU PORBANDAR

2 Bhadula (00797900) Bhadula


3 Bhogsar (00797000) Bhogsar


4 JAMRA (00797500) JAMRA


5 KADEGI (00798200) KADEGI


6 Kotda (00796400) Kotda



7

Figure 1, Geographical Location of Kadegi

Porbandar District Kadegi Project


8

1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programme

Watershed Development Programme is prioritised on the basis of thirteen parameters namely Poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ST, Actual wages, Percentage of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rainfed agriculture, Drinking water situation in the area, Percentage of the degraded land, Productivity potential of the land, Continuity of another watershed that has already developed/treated, Cluster approach for plain or for hilly terrain. Based on these thirteen parameters a composite ranking was given to Kadegi Watershed project as given in table no. 2.

The total number of families under BPL is 390, which is less than 20 per cent of the total households of the village.

Hence a score of 3 is allotted. The percentage of schedule castes in the village is about 9.39 per cent to the total population; hence a score of 3 was allotted. Rainfed agriculture forms the primary occupation of the village due to the fact that ground water is saline and hence unfit for usage. More than 62 per cent of the farmers are small and marginal by nature and the actual wages earned by the labour is less than the minimum wages hence a composite rank of 5, 3 and 10 are allotted respectively.

Since the rainfall received is erratic and irregular, the moisture index is low and the area is classified under IWDP

block. Drinking water is problematic in the village. Majority of land is degraded due to inherent salinity and ingress of salt from Saliny Water. The soil is very permeable and production of the land can be significantly enriched with the availability of timely irrigation. Kadagi watershed falls in continuity with other watersheds namely Kasabad, Mahiyari. Cluster approach was followed taking into consideration four micro-watersheds covering a total area of 5051.07 Ha. Thus a cumulative score of 104 All the parameters taken together give a cumulative score of 104 to the watershed (reference Table 2.1 below

Area proposed to be treated Table no.2: Weightage of the project

Project name

Project type Weightage

Kadegi IWMP-1 i ii iii iv v vi vii viii ix x xi xii xiii 10.0 3 5 3 3 15 15 5 15 15 10 5 NA


9

Table no. 2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed Sr.

No.

Criteria Maximum

Score

Ranges & Scores

i Poverty index (% of poor

to population

10 Above 80% (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20 %

(2.5)

ii % of SC/ST population 10 More than 40% (10) 20 to 40%(5) Less than 20% (3)

iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are

significantly lower than

minimum wages (5)

Actual wages

are equal to or

higher than

minimum wages

(0)

iv % of small and marginal

farmers

10 More than 80% (10) 50 to 80% (5) Less than 50 %

(3)

v Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0)

vi Moisture index / DPAP /

DDP Block

15 -66.7 & below (15)

DDP Block

-33.3 to -66.6

(10) DPAP Block

0 to -33.2 (0) Non

DPAP / DDP


10

Block

vii Area under rain – fed

agriculture

15 More than 90% (15) 80 to 90% (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70%

(Reject)

viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic

village (7.5)

Partially covered

(5)

Fully

covered (0)

ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20% (15) Medium – 10 to

20% (10)

Low-less than

10% of TGA (5)

x Productivity potential of

the land

15 Lands with low

production & where

productivity can be

significantly enhanced

with reasonable efforts

(15)

Lands with

moderate

production &

where

productivity can

be enhanced

with reasonable

efforts (10)

Lands with high

production &

where productivity

can be marginally

enhanced with

reasonable efforts

(5)

xi Contiguity to another

watershed that has

10 Contiguous to

previously treated

Contiguity within

the

Neither

contiguous to


11

already been

developed/treated

watershed & contiguity

within the

microwatersheds in

the project (10)

microwatersheds

in the project but

non contiguous

to previously

treated

watershed (5)

previously treated

watershed nor

contiguity within

the

microwatersheds

in the project (0)

xii Cluster approach in the

plains (more than one

contiguous micro-

watersheds in the project )

15 Above 6 micro-

watersheds in cluster

(15)

4 to 6

microwatersheds

in cluster (10)

2 to 4

microwatersheds

in cluster (5)

xiii Cluster approach in the

hills (more than one

contiguous micro-

watersheds in the project )

15 Above 5 micro-

watersheds in cluster

(15)

3 to 5

microwatersheds

in cluster (10)

2 to 3

microwatersheds

in cluster (5)

Total 150 150 90 41 2.5


12

Project type: Hilly/desert/Other Table no.3: Watershed information

Name of the Village Name of Project Name of the Village No. Of watersheds to be treated Watershed code Watershed

regime/type/order Junej

Kede

gi

Proj

ect

IWM

P-I

Junej 1 5G1B1b1a Mini Watershed Bhadula Bhadula 1 5G1A6a2e Mini Watershed Bhogsar Bhogsar 1 5G1C1b1b Mini Watershed Jamra Jamra 1 5G1A5b1a Mini Watershed Kadegi Kadegi 1 5G1A6a2e Mini Watershed Kotada Kotada 1 5G1A6a2e Mini Watershed

1.3 Other developmental projects/schemes running in the Kadegi Project

This village being very back ward, has been on top priority of a number of developmental projects. These programmes are Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS), Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC), Indira Awas Yojana (IAY) and Sakhi Mandal Besides, previously. i. MGNREGS: Construction of, murram road 58, Deepning of pond 7, Land Development 15 and 3 construction of lack has been taken-up under MGNREGA. ii. Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC): 1067 individual toilets are constructed under TSC programme. iii. Indira Awas Yojana: (Total 492 house have been constructed in the Kadegi Project under various Awas Yojana in which under Indira Awas Yojana= 177, Earth Quake covered 315 beneficiaries . iv. Sakhi Mandal Yojna– 47 Mandals are linked with bank and given loan of Rs.47000


13

Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area:

Sl no

Name of the programme/scheme

Sponsoring agency

Objectives of the programme/scheme Year of commencement Villages

covered

Estimated number of

beneficiaries 1 WASMO DWSSB WASMO 2007-08-09 6 1451

2 MGNREGS Rural Department Employment 2009 6 3285

3 IAY Rural

Department Housing 2005-08-09 6 177

4 TSC Rural Department Sanitation 2004-05 still 6 1067


14

Figure 2, Geographical Condition of the project


15


16

2.1. Project Implementing Agency The Project Implementing Agencies (PIA) is selected by an appropriate mechanism by Gujarat State Watershed

Management Agency (GSWMA), the State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) for Integrated Watershed Management

Programme (IWMP) in Gujarat. The PIAs are responsible for implementation of watershed project. These PIAs may include

relevant line departments, autonomous organizations under State/ Central Governments, Government Institutes/ Research

bodies, Intermediate Panchayats, Voluntary Organizations (VOs).The PIA for Mahiyari watershed Project is Chief

Conservator of Forest (Social Forest), Porbandar.

2.2 About Social Forest Department, Porbandar 2.2.1 The organization and its objectives: The District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Porbandar is a district level nodal agency and was established on 1

August ,2009 to oversee the smooth implementation of watershed projects in the district. The District Development Officer

(DDO) is the chairman of the DWDU. The DWDU has dedicated and experienced staff comprising one Project Manager

(deputation from Gujarat Forest Department), a technical expert and a multidisciplinary team of agriculture expert,

community mobilization expert and Data Entry Operator, civil engineer, MIS coordinator, system analyst, surveyor, and

accountant. The objectives of the DWDU, Porbandar are supervising, planning, implementing, documenting and promoting

watershed development projects and related developmental activities in the district as per guidelines. The DWDU,

Porbanar also works as a PIA for two IWMP projects.


17

2.2.2 Programmes/projects of DWDU, Porbandar:

At present 3 IWMP projects have been sanctioned by Government of India for Porbandar district . The entry point activities of all the Three IWMP projects have been identified by the respective PIAs in the district. Porbandar Forest Division is PIA for 1 projects (IWMP- 2) and DWDU itself is PIA for rest of the two projects (IWMP-1 & 3). Apart from the 3 IWMP projects, DWDU Porbandar is involved in a total of 94 pre-Hariyali & Hariyali projects (DDP &

IWDP); 51 projects are completed and 43 projects are still running in the district. The DWDU, Porbandar is also

monitoring a central government sponsored scheme on “Artificial Recharge of Groundwater through Dugwells” in the

district.

2.3 SWOT Analysis of the DWDU: Strength: (1) Dedicated and experienced staff and a multidisciplinary team

(2) Independent District Level Nodal Agency.

(3) Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities, North Gujarat University and NGOs for

capacity building and technical guidance

(4) Scientific planning in watershed projects with the help of BISAG, Gandhinagar,

(5) District level monitoring, coordination & Co-operation Committee


18

Weakness: (1) No permanent office building.

(2) No Vehicle

(3) Not any Technical Expert person in any Project of Watershed in Porbandar.

Opportunities: (1) A number of different other development schemes of the government are running; so, there can be horizontal

integration and convergence of programmes

(2) Better financial provision under IWMP

(3) Usage of new ICT tools like GIS, GPS

Threats: (1) Rainfall being very scarce and unreliable in the project area, the activities planned to be taken up may yield limited

impact

(2) Irregularities in fund flow can derail the smooth functioning

(3) Lack of contribution and cooperation from local people

(4) Low literacy rate in the project area.

(5) Because of flood prone area flood water remain for longer revised, farmer can’t take any monsoon Crop.

(6) Soil is saline.


19

Table no. 6: PIA:

Sl. No. Names of project Details of PIA

1 KADEGI

(i) Type of organization District Level Nodel Agency (Society) (ii) Name of organization DWDU, Porbandar (iii) Designation & Address Project Manager, DWDU, Porbandar (iv) Telephone (0286) 2213736 (v) Fax (0286) 2213735 (vi) E-mail pordwdugmail.com

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level:

Sl no Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned Monthly

remuneration

1 J. H. Trivedi 51 M Project Manager GAS 28 Years Project Management 50000

2 Arti N. Vyas 30 F MDT (CM) BA CRD 8 Years Community Mobilization 10000

3 Bhgwatiben M. Tilavat 30 F MDT (A/c) M.Com 1 Year Accounting 12000 4 Nishith M Purohit 30 M Sys. Analyst B.I.T. & C.A 4 Years System Analyst 8000 5 Hiriben C. Gareja 30 F Executive Asst. M.A. B. Ed 2 Years 5000 6 Sarikhda Varun 25 M WDT (Surveyer) ITI Surveyer 3 Year Surveyer 8000 7 Pranay J Raval 27 M WDT (Engg.) Dip. Civil.engg. 5 Years Civil Engineer 8000

8 Reema S. Mehta 20 F WDT (C M) BRS 11 months Community Mobilization 8000

9 Kumarkhaniya Vitthalbhai B 40 M WDT (Agri) BRS ( B.Ed.) 6 Years Agricultural

Development 8000

10 Sandip Adodariya 24 M WDT (A\C) M.Com 0 Accounting 8000


20


21

3.1. Geography and Geo-hydrology 3.1.1 Land use pattern: The net geographical area of Kadegi watershed is about 5853.11 ha out of which has no forest area. The About 70% of

land is under agriculture which is completely rain-fed; mainly a Kharif crop is taken. About 13.69% of the total land is

classified under wasteland of which 2.84 percent is cultivable and rest is uncultivable and hilly. The watershed consists of

thorny species of Ground Nuts which was mainly broadcasted to stop the spread of desert.

Table no. 8: Land use pattern:

S. No. Names of villages

Geographical Area of the

village

Forest Area

Land under agricultural

use

Rainfed area

Perm-anent

pastu-res

Wasteland

Cultivable Non-cultivable

1 Junej 496.6 - 347.7 347.7 53.9 - 14.1 2 Bhadula 936.6 - 690.2 690.2 102.5 - 16.5 3 Bhogsar 453.4 - 392 392 40.2 - 21.2 4 Jamra 1460.4 - 1287.8 1287.8 165.7 - 7 5 Kadegi 1651.8 - 1100.6 1100.6 289.8 - 70.4 6 Kotda 1365.6 - 676.2 676.2 201.8 - 14.5


22

3.1.2 Soil and topography: Kadegi watershed project (IMWP) falls under Saurashtra South Zone. The soil is mainly sandy

loamy and saline. The soil is Sticky Black to very dark grayish brown in surface colour. The depth of soil is moderate to

deep about 22 to 73 cm. The predominant texture of soil is loamy sand and silt and clay. The soil fertility is very poor with

low nitrogen, phosphorus and potash. The soil falls in Undulated to Flat. The topography of the area is moderate ranging

from 0-1% slop.

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography:

S. No. Name of the Agro-climatic zone covers project area Area in ha

Names of the villages

Major soil types Topo-graphy a)Type b) Area in ha

1

Saurashtra South Zone – 7

496.6 Junej

Sticky Black/ Sandy long –

Saline

496.6

Moderate Undulated to

flat

2 936.6 Bhadula 936.6

3 453.4 Bhogsar 453.4 4 1460.4 Jamra 1460.4 5 1651.8 Kadegi 1651.8 6 1365.6 Kotda 1365.6

# Flat, undulating, moderate slope, Steep slope


23

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition:

Sl no Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence) 1 Junej Every Year 3-4 Years 2 Bhadula Every Year 3-4 Years

3 Bhogsar Every Year 3-4 Years

4 Jamra Every Year 3-4 Years

5 Kadegi Every Year 3-4 Years

6 Kotda Every Year 3-4 Years

11. Edaphic Factors

Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion

Cause Type of erosion Area affected (ha) Run off (mm/ year)

Average soil loss (Tonnes/ ha/ year)

Water erosion a Sheet 4708.672

b Rill 697.517 c Gully 406.946 d Ravenous

Sub-Total 5813.135 Wind erosion 5813.135 NA

Total


24

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress)

Name of the Village Survey Number Soil pH Type of Salinity (Inherent/Ingress)

Junej

Ingrees

Bhadula Bhogsar Jamra Kadegi Kotda

Table no. 11.3: Waterlogging Conditions Name of the Village Survey Number Reasons

Junej All most all the land area Kharo river is Nearest Villages Runoff water washout the soil

Bhadula All most all the land area Kharo river is Nearest Villages Runoff water washout the soil

Bhogsar All most all the land area Bhadar river is Nearest Villages Runoff water washout the soil

Jamra All most all the land area Kharo River is Water and Nearest Villages Runoff water washout the soil

Kadegi All most all the land area Kharo River is Water and Nearest Villages Runoff water washout the soil

Kotda All most all the land area Milsar, Bhadar, Lakendri and Dudhi rivers are Nearest Villages Runoff

water washout the soil


25

The rainfall is scanty which has resulted in recurrent phenomenon Flood every years. The average rainfall of this

area is about 833 mm (from past five year data) with a highest intensity of 84 mm within span of a day. This uneven distribution is leading to runoff of soil every year to the streams, rivulets and depressed area saline.

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions:

Name of project Average rainfall- last 5 years Average temperature

IWMP-1 833 Summer Winter

Max Min Max Min 42 35 40 39

Table no. 13: Physiography and relief

Project name Elevation Slope range (%) Major streams IWMP-1 43 meters 0-1 % Kharo River

3.1.3 Land and Agriculture: Lack of surface water source and high salinity of ground water has limited the sufficient base for irrigation as well as for

drinking purpose. The average land holding is ranging from 1 to 4 ha. Lack of irrigation source forces the majority of the

farmers to take one Crop in all seasons. This affects directly the demographic profile of the village. The major crops

cultivated by the farmers are Ground nuts and Jowar (Sorghum). Some of the farmers take up rain-fed castor crop if rainfall

is good. The land conservation measures such as earthen bunds and farm bunds in the area will help them to take up a

rabi crop of wheat and Chana in the residual moisture.


26

Table no. 14: Land ownership details

Sl

no Village

Total owned land HHs giving

land on lease

HHs taking

land on lease Gen OBC SC ST

1 Junej

2 Bhadula 297.9915 598.1670 24.2294 -

3 Bhogsar

4 Jamra 40.5063 814.80548 - -

5 Kadegi 30.2181 1060.5197 39.8232 -

6 Kotda


27

Figure 3, Bio Physical Survey of the project


28

Table no. 15: Agriculture

Sl no Village Net sown area (in ha)

One time Two times Three times

1 Junej 335.8 NA NA

2 Bhadula 670.2 NA NA

3 Bhogsar 330.6 NA NA

4 Jamra 1115.1 951.78 NA

5 Kadegi 1056.78 NA NA

6 Kotda 658.2 NA NA


29

Table no. 16: Irrigation

Sl

no Village

Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Well

Availability

months Net area

Gross

area

Availability

months Net area

Gross

area

Availability

months

Net

area

Gross

area

1 Junej NA NA NA 6 month NA NA NA NA NA

2 Bhadula NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

3 Bhogsar NA NA NA 3-6 5 5 0-3 5 5

4 Jamra NA NA NA 3-6 75 75 - - -

5 Kadegi NA NA NA 6 - - - - -

6 Kotda NA NA NA 3-6 75 75 NA NA NA


30

Table no. 17: Crop details

Sl

no Village Kharif (Monsoon)

Ground Nut Crop 2 Crop 3

Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity

1 Jamra 618.66 123731 200 - - - - - -

2 Kadegi 686.91 137382 200 - - - - - -

3 Junej 235.06 70518 300 - - - - - -

4 Bhadula 459.14 410497.5 875 - - - - - -

5 Bhogsar 231.42 57855 250 - - - - - -

6 Kotda 460.74 129007 280 - - - - - -


31

Sl

no Village Rabi (Winter)

Juwar Channa Crop 3

Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity

1 Jamra 519.20 62304 120 230.25 29932 130 - - -

2 Kadegi 430.25 47327.5 110 267.30 32076 120 - - -

3 Junej 153.80 19225 125 135.20 18252 135 - - -

4 Bhadula 315.20 36248 115 165.33 20666 125 - - -

5 Bhogsar 163.15 22025 135 125.23 14401 115 - - -

6 Kotda 380.25 53235 140 156.20 19525 125 - - -


32

3.1.4 Livestock: The village has 266 cows, 1732 buffaloes, 1006 bullocks, 1526 goat . Majority of rabari community depends on goat and

sheep rearing for their livelihood. Cows and buffaloes are of local breed. Lack of rain and surface water has reduced the

fodder and pasture availability for their animals. This leads to heavy migration to other parts of the state with their herds of

goats and sheep. Milk production is so low in the village.

Table no. 18: Livestock

Sl

no Village Buffalo Cow

Total Milk

(Buffalo+Cow) Goat Sheep Bullock Hen Others

No milk No Milk No Milk

1 Junej 235 1420/DAY 25 90/DAY 1510/DAY 350 350/DAY 350 210 0 4

2 Bhadula 175 1750/DAY 10 55/DAY 1805/DAY 5 4/DAY 00 100 0 11

3 Bhogsar 100 1500/DAY 40 400/DAY 1900/DAY 25 23.5/DAY 60 80 0 3

4 Jamra 200 2850/DAY 25 250/DAY 3100/DAY 100 91/DAY - 140 0 3

5 Kadegi 230 1700/DAY 60 250/DAY 1950/DAY 525 25/DAY 500 110 0 15

6 Kotda 792 6336/DAY 106 530/DAY 6866/DAY 524 511/DAY 860 366 0 29

Total 1732 15556/DAY 266 1575/DAY 17131/DAY 1526 1004.5/DAY 1770 1006 0 65


33

Table no. 19: Drinking water

Sl no Village Ground water table (mt) Source of drinking

water Availability in

months Quality

1 Junej 25-30 mt

Bore Water Pipe Line From Paswari 9 Month Not Good

2 Bhadula 25-30 mt Bore Water Pipe Line

From Paswari 9 Month Not Good

3 Bhogsar 25-30 mt Bore Water Pipe Line


4 Jamra 25-30 mt Bore Water Pipe Line


5 Kadegi 25-30 mt Bore Water Pipe Line


6 Kotda 25-30 mt Bore Water Pipe Line



34

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources

S. No.

Names of

project

Name of

Village

CPR Particulars

Total Area (ha) Area owned/ In possession of Area available for treatment (ha)

Pvt. persons

Govt. (specif

y deptt.)

PRI Any

other (Pl. Specify)

Pvt. person

s

Govt. (speci

fy deptt.)

PRI Any other

(Pl. Specify)

1

IWMP-

1

Junej

Wasteland/

degraded land 279.7 53.9 279.7 53.9

Pastures 14.1 14.1

Village Ponds/

Tanks 2

Community

Buildings 1

Temples/ Places of

worship 4


35

2

IWMP-1

Bhadula

Wasteland/ degraded land 690.2 16.5 690.2 16.5

Pastures 102.5 102.

5

Village Ponds/ Tanks 2

Community Buildings 1

Temples/ Places of worship 3

3 Bhogsar


Pastures 21.2 21.2 Village Ponds/ Tanks 4




36

4

IWMP-1

JAMRA


Pastures 7 7 Village Ponds/ Tanks 2



5 KADEGI

Wasteland/

degraded land 740.4 289.8 740.4 289.8

Pastures 70.4 70.4

Village Ponds/

Tanks 1

Community

Buildings 1

Temples/ Places of

worship 9


37

6 IWMP-

1

Kotda

Wasteland/

degraded land 459.9 201.8 459.9 201.8

Pastures 14.5 14.5

Village Ponds/

Tanks 7

Community

Buildings 1

Temples/ Places of

worship 10


38

3.2. Socio-Economic Profile 3.2.1 Demographic Status: Kadegi watershed project has a total of 2129 households with a population of 8369 (as per base-line survey) out of which

4461 are male and 3908 female .The sex ratio is 877 female to 1000 male. There are 390 BPL families. The average

family size is 5. The literacy rate is average i.e. 51.04 per cent; male literacy rate is 59.41 per cent (of total male

population) and female literacy rate is 41.14 per cent (of total female population). It is noticeable that only 15 Percent

persons have reached up to ninth standard. The major castes in the village are Patel. Mer(OBC), Gen and Schedule Tribe

. Majority of population is involved in agriculture and animal husbandry.

Table no. 21: Demographic information

Sl

no Village Population SC ST

Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female %

1 Junej 560 299 261 67 38 29 11.96 0 0 0 0

2 Bhadula 698 366 332 88 43 45 12.60 0 0 0 0

3 Bhogsar 485 252 233 55 29 26 11 0 0 0 0

4 Jamra 1191 637 554 128 62 66 11 7 3 4 0.06

5 Kadegi 2227 1142 1085 75 39 36 3.40 0 0 0 0

6 Kotda 3208 1765 1443 205 105 100 06 0 0 0 0

Total 8369 4461 3908 618 316 302 9.33 7 3 4 0.06


39

Table no. 22: Literacy rate

Sl no Village Literacy Literacy %

above age 14

Literacy %

below age 14 Total % Male % Female %

1 Junej 326 58.21 207 69.23 119 45.60 40.75 17.46

2 Bhadula 413 59.17 252 68.85 161 48.49 41.42 17.75

3 Bhogsar 256 53 160 63 96 41 37.1 15.9

4 Jamra 579 49 351 55 228 41 34.3 14.7

5 Kadegi 1009 45.86 621 54.37 388

35.76 32.10 13.76

6 Kotda 1310 41 806 46 504 35 28.7 12.3

Total 3893 51.04 2397 59.41 1496 41.14 35.73 15.31

Migration Pattern: People migrate during summer season to different parts of the District like Jungadh and Rajkot as

daily wagers, agricultural labours and construction workers. Lack of fodder availability and grazing land for smaller

ruminant force these people to migrate to other places


40

Table no. 23: Migration details

Sl

no Village

Total

population

Migration Migration by months

Main reason

for migration

Income

during

migration

/ month

Total Male Female Up to 3

months

3-6

months

More

than 6

months

1 Junej 560 58 42 16 Na YES

Lake of

Employment

2200

2 Bhadula 698 140 84 56 Na YES 2250

3 Bhogsar 485 65 45 20 Na YES 2350

4 Jamra 1191 250 180 70 Na NO 2350

5 Kadegi 2227 245 174 71 Na NO 2200

6 Kotda 3208 550 335 215 Na YES 2850


41

Table no. 24: Poverty

Sl no Village Total

Household

BPL % of BPL

HH

Total Land less

HH

% of land less

HH 0-16 16-20 Total

1 Junej 154 5 6 11 7.14 24 15.58%

1 Bhadula 190 4 33 37 19.47 37 19.47%

1 Bhogsar 167 43 21 64 38.32 25 14.80%

1 JAMRA 275 116 82 198 72% 9 3.28%

1 KADEGI 525 3 38 41 7.80% 39 7.42%

1 Kotda 733 17 22 39 5.32 90 12.28%

Infrastructure facilities: Kadegi watershed is well connected with Kutiyana Taluka with pucca roads. The village has electricity connectivity under

Jyotigram Yojana of the State Government. Nearly 99 per cent of households in the village have their personal electric

meters. Kadegi Projecthas a primary school with all facilities. For middle and higher secondary education, the students

have to go to Kutiyana 30 kilometres away. This also contributes to lower education level of the people. The village do not

have a Primary Health Centre for which villagers have to go to Kutiyana which is 30 Km. away. The village comes under

not Group Panchayat..


42

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure

Sl

no Village

Pucca

road

to the

village

(Y/N)

Schools

Colleges

(Number)

Post

Office

(Distance)

Banks

(Number)

Distance

from

nearest

market

yard

Milk

collection

centre

(Number)

Milk

cooperative

(Number)

Other

cooperatives

/ CBIs

(Number)

Any other

institution LP UP HS

1 Junej Y LP up 0 2 km 0 30 KM 1 1 0 0

2 Bhadula Y LP 0 0 0 28 KM 1 1 0 0

3 Bhogsar Y LP 0 7 0 15 KM 1 1 0 0

4 Jamra Y LP UP 0 0 0 22 KM 1 1 0 0

5 Kadegi Y LP UP 0 0 0 32 KM 1 1 0 0

6 Kotda Y LP 0 0 0 9 KM 1 1 0 0


43

Table no. 26 : Facilities / HH assets

Sl

no Village

HHs with

electricity

HHs

with

safety

latrines

HHs with phones HHs with vehicle HHs

with TV

set

HHs

with

cooking

gas

HHs with

Drinking

water

HHs

with

freedge

Land

line Mobile

2-

wheeler

4-

wheeler

1 Junej 154 115 0 118 67 6 128 19 154 12

2 Bhadula 175 135 30 175 56 2 95 15 190 15

3 Bhogsar 167 120 2 125 39 3 112 11 167 10

4 Jamra 275 98 40 215 157 20 145 17 275 19

5 Kadegi 498 211 15 491 155 19 145 87 450 29

6 Kotda 733 733 115 690 432 50 358 55 729 115


44

3.3. Livelihood pattern:

The villagers earn their livelihood from animal husbandry and agriculture and during lean seasons they migrate for daily

wage labourers in Kutiya , & Junagadh District and as agriculture labour in other parts of the District.

Table no. 27: Income

Sl no Village Agriculture Animal

husbandry Casual labour Others Total

1 Junej 7738000 171000 777000 0 8686000

2 Bhadula 7422000 479000 809500 30000 8740500

3 Bhogsar 4550000 173000 765000 0 5488000

4 Jamra 3650000 369000 709000 75000 4638600

5 Kadegi 14134000 798000 2537800 163200 17633000

6 Kotda 19029000 2109700 6675000 45000 27858700

Total 56523000 4099700 12273300 313200 73044800


45

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)

Sl

no Village

Total

workforce Agriculture

Animal

husbandry

(AH)

Agriculture

+ AH

Casual

labour Services Handicraft Others

1 Junej 364 200 73 55 47 18 0 25

2 Bhadula 454 250 91 68 59 23 0 32

3 Bhogsar 315 173 63 47 41 16 0 22

4 Jamra 774 426 155 116 101 39 0 54

5 Kadegi 1448 796 290 217 188 72 0 101

6 Kotda 2085 1147 417 313 271 104 0 146

Total 5440 2992 1088 816 707 272 0 381


46

3.4. Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: project area vs. District vs. State vs. Country vs. World: “The term productivity in general means the total output per unit of factor input. For example land productivity means

output per hectare of land. Productivity is an average and is calculated by dividing the total output of a particular crop by

the total cultivated area under that crop.”

Data are made available by the Baseline survey (for Kadegi Project), Handbook of Agriculture, ICAR publication 2006(For

Gujarat and India), and Final district plan (IWDP) of Dept. of Agriculture (for Porbandar). The results indicate that Kadegi

Project has very low productivity compared to world, India, Gujarat and Porbandar. The productivity is low not only

because that the land is unproductive or the farmer’s lack the skills to manage their crop but also due lack to of source of

irrigation, salty water and scarcity of rain.

The Kadegi Project comes under arid zone. So farmers grow crop according to the rainfall. If they get good rainfall they

generally grow high value crops like Ground nut, Juwar etc. In case of low rainfall they can’t take any crops. So we can

say that monsoon decides cropping patterns of Kadegi Project.

The world productivity of Ground nuts is 665.80 kg/ha. In India, it is grown in about 7.3 lakh hectares with a production of

8.0 lakh tonnes and productivity of 1,094 kg/ha. Gujarat alone produces about 80% of the total castor of our country from

50% of the area with a record productivity of about 1950 kg/ha. Porbanar district has very good productivity 1300 kg /ha.

The Kadegi Projectarea has only 400 kg/ha productivity. It is very low compare to district, State, India and world.


47

Figer No. 4 Comparative Groundnut Producitivity

Pearl millet is the fourth most important grain crop next to rice,wheat and sorghum.The crop is cultivaed for grain as

well as fodder in the semi arid tropical regions. Pearl millet traditionally is an indispensable component of dry-land farming

system. In world pearl millet productivity is 984 kg/ha and India has 1094 kg/ha of Bajara productivity and Gujarat is far

better than world and India. The productivity of pearl millet is 3800 kg/ha for Porbanar, whereas for Kadegi porject, it is only

500 kg/ha.

G roundnut P roduc tivity (kg /ha/year)

665.8

1094

19501300

400

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

World India G ujarat P orbandar K adeg i


48

Figer No. 5 Comparative Pearal Millet Producitivity

Rapeseed (mustard) is the second most important oilseed crop after groundnut,contributing nearly 25-30% of the total

oilseed production in the country.The world productivity of Rapeseed-mustard is 829 kg/ha.We can see that Kadegi

Projecthas very low productivity in comparison to Porbanar,Gujarat,India and world

P earl millet produc tivity (kg /ha/year)

9841,094

1,9501,800

500

0

500

1000

1500

2000



49

The world and India productivity of cumin are 550 kg,400 kg per hectare respectively. Gujarat is a major cumin producing

state in India with the productivity of 472 kg/ha.Cumin productivity of Porbanar is 300 kg/ha and Kadegi village has very

poor productivity with 225 Kg/ha.

Figer No. 6 Comparative Cumin Producitivity

C umin produc tivity (kg /ha/year)

550

400

472

300

225

0

100

200

300

400

500

600



50

The Kadegi Project area has low productivity because of the following reasons:

i) Full dependence on monsoon: Kadegi Project is dependent on monsoon. Water is essential input in agriculture. Due to the absence of proper irrigation

facility, 100% of the total cultivated area depends on the uncertain monsoon. Therefore, the success or failure of the

monsoon determines the success or failure of agriculture production. The rainfall is unreliable due to two factors: untimely

and inadequate.

ii) Low use of fertilizer per unit cropped area: Farmers do not use sufficient fertilizer due to lack of water, scarcity of fertilizer in market and insufficient money for

fertilizer. Many a times they don’t get fertilizer at the right time. and the salinity also decrees his fertility.

iii) Traditional farming methods: This also leads to low productivity. There is a lot of ignorance about the use of new farming methods and technologies

such as multiple cropping. They don’t use FYM and other input in a proper way; that is why they don’t get 100% output. So

these factors contribute to low productivity.


51

iv) Lack of adequate farm machinery: Even today a large number of farmers in Junej use wooden ploughs and bullocks. They don’t have adequate machinery

like seed drill. So, old machineries take more time in tillage practices.

v) Lack of finances for farmers: In Junej most of the farmers are marginal and small. They do not have enough money to buy good quality seeds,

machinery and other inputs.

vi) Lack of good quality seeds and fertilizers: Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The use of good quality leads to

higher land productivity. In Junej, however, there are two limitations in the use of fertilizer. First these fertilizers are most

useful in irrigated condition. But in Junej 100 per cent of land depend on rainfall. In Junej mostly farmers use nitrogenous

fertilizers, especially urea, it can’t decrees salinity. This has resulted in disproportionate use of fertilizer depleting the

quality of land.


52

vii) Lack of other facilities such as storage and marketing: 5-10% of agriculture product damage after harvesting due to scarcity of proper storage and proper market for sale. So he

sells to local traders at the low prices. Farmers mainly face proper means of transportation and roads. And second problem

is farmers don’t have proper storage facilities.


53


54

Watershed Activities Watershed management as a strategy has been adopted by Government of India especially in the rain-fed regions of semi-

arid tropics. These regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure

development, low literacy and high incidence of migration. Several studies have identified that there is a dire need of a

systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed development. The common guidelines generate a fresh and

flexible framework for the next generation watershed development.

4.1. Scientific Planning:

i) Cluster Approach This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-watershed. The Kadegi

Projectconsists of four microwatersheds namely 5G1B1b1a as their respective codes. Further Junej watershed project is

in continuation with other watershed projects.

ii) Base line Survey To access the impact of any watershed development programme a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This

acts a benchmark for any intervention during and post implementation of any development programme. A detailed baseline

survey was undertaken which involved household census survey, Bio-physical survey and Village level data collection from

Talati –cum mantri. Household census survey includes a detailed questionnaire which was been filled by visiting each and

every household in the village. This gave in the details of the demographic profile of the village, the literacy percentage,


55

SC/ST population, number of BPL household, cattle population, net consumption rate in the village, average milk

production of the cattle and various schemes running and their benefits

Bio-physical survey was undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil

typology, well in the area, crop taken in the field, Cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the

field.

iii) Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders

towards the programme. This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and

indigenous Technological Knowledge (ITK) while planning for any activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for

planning, implementing, monitoring and post- withdrawal activities with a complete accountability of the stakeholders.

Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social mapping, and season calendars were used to understand the

physical and social orientation of the village in general and watershed in specific. These tools put the villagers in ease than

the complicated questionnaires. Various tools like Matrix ranking, Venn Diagram were used to identify various local

vegetations (apt for afforestation) , Fodders crops , various institution and their significance in the life of the farmers


56

iv) Use of GIS and Remote sensing for planning

Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development.

a) Prioritization Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like

Geo-morphological, Soil, BPL Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation Slope percent.

These were all given proper weightage according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of various

watershed areas.

b) Planning A action plan matrix was formulated by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) taking into account various features like the

slope percent, soil Depth, Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land. Global

positioning System (GPS) was used to identify each and every water conservation structures available in the project area.

This was used to create a map. Contour Map of vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:8000 was used for identifying

various locations for soil and water conservation structures.


57

c) Hydrological modelling

Hydrology modelling technique was used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, Flow accumulation. This

model overlaid over cadastral map to calculate the catchment area of each structures like the check dam etc. This has

helped to remove the human error which generally occurs while calculating the catchment area of a check dam.

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects

S. No.

Scientific criteria/ inputs used Whether scientific criteria

was used

(A) Planning

Cluster approach Yes

Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention

the name of the Institute

Baseline survey Yes

Hydro-geological survey Yes

Contour mapping Yes

Participatory Net Planning (PNP) Yes

Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover Yes


58

Ridge to Valley treatment

Online IT connectivity between

(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes

(2) DRDA and SLNA Yes

(3) SLNA and DoLR Yes

Availability of GIS layers

1. Cadastral map Yes

2. Village boundaries Yes

3. Drainage Yes

4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes

5. Land use Yes

6. Ground water status Yes

7. Watershed boundaries Yes

8. Activity Yes

Crop simulation models# Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed soil nutrient analysis Yes

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)# No

Weather Station No

(B) Inputs


59

1. Bio-pesticides No 2. Organic manures No 3. Vermicompost Yes 4. Bio-fertilizer Yes 5. Water saving devices Yes 6. Mechanized tools/ implements Yes 7. Bio-fencing Yes 8. Nutrient budgeting No 9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers No Any other (please specify)


60

Figer No. 7 Focuas Group Discussion


61


62

4.2. Institution building

i) Watershed Committee (WC) It is a committee that is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with technical support of WDT in

the village. This committee is registered under society Registration Act 1860. The Gram Sabha of the village selects the

chairman of the watershed committee with the secretary who will be a paid functionary. A watershed Committee was

formed accordingly in Junej village. Since the watershed has only one village so no separate watershed sub-committee

was formed in the village. Capacity building training to the watershed committee is given by WDT.


63

Table No. 31 Committee Details

Sl. No.

Names of WCs

Date of Registration

as a Society (dd/mm/

yyyy)

Designation Name M/

F SC ST SF

MF

LF

Land-less UG

SHG

GP Any othe

r

Educa-tional

qualifi-cation

Function/s

assigned#

1

Bhad

ula

Wat

ersh

ed C

omm

ittee

Und

er P

rogr

ess

President Bhalodiya Kumandas B. M √ √ √ 10 Secretary Bhalodiya Sureshbhai

B. M √ √ 12

Member/ Secretary Vyas Arti N. F √ CRD Member Seradiya Viotthalbhai S. M √ √ 10 (Member Rabara Ranchodbhai J. M √ √ 8 (Member) Kher Hardasbhai P. M √ √ 6 (Member Bhoraniya Hardasbhai

K.) M √ √ 12 (Member) Keshwala Bachubhai

Masri M √ √ 7 (Member) Maru Hardasbhai T. M √ √ √ 10 (Member) Vaghela Mansukhbhai

S.. M √ √ √ 0 (Member) Koradiya Kaushalyaben

K. F √ √ 10 (Member) Kher Valiben C. M √ √ 0

2 ar

Wat

ersh

ed

Com

m U

nder

Pr

ogre

ss (President) Bhogesara Hajabhai K.. M √ √ √ 12

(Secretary) Bhogesara Hirben H. F √ √ 7


64

(Member/ Secretary) Vyas Arti N. F √ CRD Member Bhogesara Nagajan U. M √ √ 8

(Member) Bhogesara Motiben A.. F √ √ 5 (Member) Bhogesara Puriben K. F √ √ 3 (Member) Bhogesara Karsanbhai

R. M √ √ 5 (Member) Bhogesara Nagabhai R. M √ √ 5 (Member) Bhogesara Lilabhai A. M √ √ 3 (Member) Chavda Govindbhai S. M √ √ √ 4 (Member) Chavda Labhuben G. F √ √ √ 2 (Member) Jivtiben Keshubhai F √ √ 7

3

Jam

ra W

ater

shed

Com

mitt

ee

Und

er P

rogr

ess

(President) Karangiya Vejiben P. M √ √ √ 5 (Secretary) Karangiya Hardasbhai

N. M √ √ 12

(Member/ Secretary) Vyas Arti N. F √ CRD Member Karangiya Nanduben M. F √ √ 5

(Member) Karangiya Manjuben V.. F √ √ 7 (Member) Vala Pala V. M √ √ 4 (Member) Vadoliya Sarmanbhai B. M √ √ 7


65

(Member) Vadoliya Nathabhai U. M √ √ 6 (Member) Karangiya Maniben B. F √ √ 2 (Member) Karangiya Mulubhai L. M √ √ 5 (Member) Vadoliya Sajanben K. F √ √ 0 (Member) Sisodiya Masribhai K. M √ √ 5

4

Kade

gi W

ater

shed

Com

mitt

ee

Und

er P

rogr

ess

(President) Kadegiya Keshubhai A. M √ √ √ 12 (Secretary) Kadegiya Sanganbhai M

√ √ 7 (Member/ Secretary) Vyas Arti N. F √ CRD Member Kadegiya Jivabhai R. M √ √ 6

(Member) Chauhan Rajsibhai M. M √ √ √ 5 (Member) Jadeja Chana A. M √ √ 8 (Member) Kodiyatar Gogadhbhai

M. M √ √ √ 0 (Member) Chauhan Manjuben M. F √ √ √ 0 (Member) Solanki Kamlaben J. F √ √ √ 5 (Member) Kadegiya Hiriben G. F √ √ 0 (Member) Kadegiya Satiben S. F √ √ 0


66

(Member) Kadegiya Ramdebhai D.. M √ √ 5

5

Kotd

a W

ater

shed

Com

mitt

ee

Und

er P

rogr

ess

(President) Modha Bhimabhai S. M √ √ √ 8 (Secretary) Odedara Ramdebhai D. M

√ √ 10 (Member/ Secretary) Vyas Arti N. F √ CRD Member Odedra Alabhai M. M √ √ 2

(Member) Parmar Karshanbhai L. M √ √ 4 (Member) Modha Valiben B. F √ √ 0 (Member) Parmar Gauri K.

(Member) F √ √ √ 9 (Member) Chauhan Jivat D. M √ √ √ 0 (Member) Odedara Jayshreeben

N. F √ √ √ 9 (Member) Rabari Devabhai V. M √ √ √ 4 (Member) Timaniya Lakhmanbhai

J. M √ √ √ 4 (Member) Bambhaniya Kishorbhai

D. M √ √ 10

6

June

j W

ater

she

d C

omm

itte

Und

er

Pro

gres

s (President

) Modha Vikrambhai V. M

√

√ √ 10

Modhvadiya F √ √ 7


67

(Secretary)

Leenaben J.

(Member/ Secretary) Vyas Arti N. F √ CRD

Member Modha Motiben A. F √ √ 7

(Member) Vadher Nathiben K. F √ √ 2

(Member) Gosai Manglaben M. F √ √ 7

(Member)

Modhvadiya Shantiben P. F √ √ 6

(Member) Modha Dudabhai A.. M √ √ 9

(Member) Parmar Nebhabhai H. M √ √ 1

(Member) Modha Lakhabhai R. M √ √ 10

(Member) Pandya Dhirajlal M. M √ √ 10

(Member) Vadher Dilipbhai A. M √ √ 8


68

ii )Self Help Group Self Help Groups are motivated, small homogenous groups organized together through credit and thrift activities. Self help

group initiative especially for women/men help uplift their livelihood. Generally self help groups include landless and poor

women.

Before formation of the SHGs, during PRA activities, Focussed Group Discussions (FGDs) were held with the women,

which came up with the following observations:

a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institution.

b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders

c) Lack of attitude for saving among poor people

d) Lack of knowledge on credit and thrift activity and banking.

With a detailed discussion with some of the local working in the area like Sakhi Mandal, it was planned to have some

capacity building training regarding SHG activities. It was also proposed to have some livelihood activities which will

promote women empowerment.


69

Table no. 32: SHG detail

Name of

the

Village.

Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each

category

No. of BPL in each

category

With

only

Men

With only

Women

With

both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

Junej 1 1 0 2

(i) Landless 9 9 5 5 9 0 9

(ii) SF 2 11 13 3 3 0 8 8

(iii) MF

(iv) LF

Total

1 1 2 11 11 22 5 3 8 9 8 15

Bhadula 1 0 0 1

(i) Landless

(ii) SF 11 11

(iii) MF

(iv) LF

Total 11 11


70

Bhogsar 2 2 0 4

(i) Landless 18 8 26 11 11

(ii) SF 4 14 18

(iii) MF

(iv) LF

Total 2 2 0 4 22 22 44 11 11

Jamra 1 1 0 2

(i) Landless 5 6 11

(ii) SF 6 5 11

(iii) MF

(iv) LF

Total 11 11 22

Kadegi 2 2 1 5

(i) Landless 11 11 22 1 1 2

(ii) SF 22 11 33 17 3 20

(iii) MF

(iv) LF

Total 2 2 1 5 33 22 55 18 4 22


71

Kotda 3 2 0 5

(i) Landless 22 24 35 11 24 35 11 0 11

(ii) SF 11 0 11

(iii) MF

(iv) LF

Total 3 2 0 5 33 24 57 11 24 35 11 0 11


72

User Group: User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or asset created under the programme on a long term basis. The

user group collect user charges from their members, oversee the works and manage the benefits. It was decided that

each group would formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership with community spirit.

Table no. 33: UG detail

S. No. Total no. of UGs No. of members

No. of SC/ST in

each category

No. of BPL in each

category

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

(i)Landless

(ii) SF

(iii) MF

(iv) LF

Total


73

Table no.34: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S.

No.

Names of

Villages

Amount

earmarked for

EPA

Entry Point Activities planned Estimated cost Expected

outcome

1 Junej 2.38

Storage Room in Smasan,with new smashan

2.30

Roof Water Harvesting Structer (2, in School & Agnwadi) 0.60

2 Bhadula 4.49

New construction of havada

0.90

Repairing of Community well 0.52 Roof Water Harvesting Structer (2, in

School & Agnwadi, 0.60

Community roof water harvesting 0.60

R.O. filter 0.20


74

3 BHOGSAR 2.17

Wire Fancing With Gate in GP, Agnwadi 0.37

R.O. filter in school 0.20

Roof Water Harvesting Structure in

School & Agnwadi

0.60

Recharging of Pond 1.09

4 Jamra 7.01

wire fencing with Gate in Samsan with

Gardening 0.60

Repairing Community Hall with Roof

Water Harvesting Structer 0.82

Roof Water Harvesting Structer in

School & Agnwadi 0.60

Snanghat 1.51

Hume Pipe Culvert 1.68

R.O. Plant 0.20

Havada With Slab 0.86

5 Kadegi 4.08 wire fancing with gate in Samsan with 1.45


75

Toilet Block

Roof Water Harvesting Structer in

School & Agnwadi 0.60

R.O. filter (1) 0.20

Hume Pipe Culvert 0.71

Pond Recharging line 0.52

6 Kotda

4.10

Repairing of pump house 0.60

Repairing of community open well 0.40

Stand Post ( water tap–7 nozzle) 0.20

R.O. filter (1) 0.20

New Havada With Slab 0.86

Wire Fancing With Gate & Gardening at

aanganwadi,pump room 0.87

Community Pond Wire Fencing and Bio

Fencing 1.00

Total 24.23 - 24.78


76


77

(A) New Construction of Havada with slab at village:- Bhadula, Ta-kutiyana,.

I t e m Description No Length Width Depth Qty. T. Qty. Unit Rate Amount

1 Excavation for Foundation including

dewatering & depositing the excavated

material as and where directed with

lead of 100 mt and all lift etc. comp.

a) Loose or Soft Soil

b) Dense or Hard Soil

c) Hard Murrum

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 13 Sr. No. 3

2

2

1

9.00

6.54

4.45

0.23

0.23

2.46

0.23

0.23

0.60

0.95

0.69

6.58

8.23

CMT

70.00

576.10

2

P & L C.C.-1:3:6 and curing comp

.(A) Foundation & plinth

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 16 Sr.

2

2 9.00

2.00

2.50

2.50

0.15

0.15

6.75

1.50

10.09

CMT

1758.00

17738.22


78

No.3 1

1

4.00

4.00

2.00

2.00

0.15

0.08

1.20

0.64

3

U.C.R. masonry with hard stone of approved quality in foundation & plinth in C.M. 1:6 incl.

levelling up etc. comp. (i) C.M. 1:6

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 28 Sr. No. 1

1 4.46 2.46 0.45 4.94 4.94 CMT 1473.00 7276.62

4

Filling available excavated earth in trenches plinth, sides of foundation etc. comp.

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 14 Sr. No. 6

2

2

8.54

2.00

2.27

2.27

0.15

0.15

5.82

1.36

7.18

CMT

29.90

214.68


79

5

White stone bela masonary block in course

in super structure in C.M. 1:6 etc. comp.

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 29 Sr. No. 11

0.23

0.15

4.00

1.54

1.54

9.00

6.54

4.46

2.00

0.38

0.23

0.23

0.23

0.23

0.23

0.23

0.23

0.23

2.74

2.74

1.00

1.00

0.76

0.45

0.45

0.45

0.45

0.96

0.38

1.84

0.71

0.27

1.86

1.35

0.92

0.41

8.71 CMT 2530.00 22036.30

6

P & L C.C. 1:2:4 & curing comp. for chejja,

lintel, beam, Slab etc

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 17 Sr. No. 11[B]

2

2

1

2

2

4.46

2.00

4.46

4.91

2.91

0.23

0.23

2.46

0.45

0.45

0.23

0.23

0.13

0.13

0.13

0.47

0.21

1.43

0.57

0.34

3.02

CMT

2524.00

7622.48


80

7

Cold twised steel rein forcement for RCC

work incl. bending, etc comp

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 18 Sr. No. 14(A)

6

60

6

34

36

23

4.46

0.92

2.46

0.92

3.81

5.81

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

26.76

55.20

14.76

31.28

137.16

133.63

23.82

21.53

13.14

12.20

85.0392

52.1157 207.83 KG 50.00 10391.50

8

Cold twised steel rein forcement for RCC

work incl. bending, etc comp.

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 18 Sr. No. 14(A)

2

2

1

8

8

8

2

2

2

2

1

2

3.70

1.70

1.70

0.38

0.23

0.38

3.70

1.70

5.36

2.46

4.00

4.46

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

2.00

0.00

2.23

2.23

2.23

2.74

2.74

1.74

0.69

0.69

1.03

1.03

0.00

1.13

16.50

7.58

3.79

8.32

5.04

5.29

5.11

2.35

11.04

5.07

8.00

9.04

91.65

CMT

152.00

13930.80


81

2 2.00 0.00 1.13 4.52

9

P & L C.C. 1:2:4 laid in one layer finished

with a floating coat of a neat cement

(B) 50 mm thick

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 49 Sr. No. 15(B)

1

1

3.54

4.00

1.54

2.00

0.00

0.00

5.45

8.00 13.45 SMT 167.00 2246.15

10 White Washing with lime two coat to give

an even shade etc comp.

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 58 Sr. No. 1

8

8

8

2

2

2

2

1

2

2

0.38

0.23

0.38

3.70

1.70

5.36

2.46

4.00

4.46

2.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

2.00

0.00

0.00

2.74

2.74

1.74

0.69

0.69

1.03

1.03

0.00

1.13

1.13

8.32

5.04

5.29

5.11

2.35

11.04

5.07

8.00

9.04

4.52 63.78 SMT 3.60 229.61


82

11 Providing cement Vata (10 cm x 10 cm size)

quater round in cement mortam 1:1 incl.

neat cemet finishing. watering etc. comp.

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 57 Sr. No. 15

2

2

2

4

4.00

2.00

3.31

1.54

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

8.00

4.00

6.62

6.16

24.78

RMT

15.80

391.524

12 P & F polythelene pipe to wall celling & floor

6.0 kgf/cm4 working pressure low density.

(E) 50mm dia

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 72 Sr. No. 4(E)

2

2.00

0.00

0.00

4.00

4.00

RMT

109.00

436

13

P & F polythelene pipe to wall celling & floor


(E) 50mm dia 1 22.00 0.00 0.00 22.00 22.00 RMT 109.00 2398


83

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 72 Sr. No. 4(E)

Total Net Rs. :: >> 85487.98

Say Net Rs. :: >> 85490.00


84


85

(B) New Construction of Wood Storage Room at smashan at village:- Junej,Ta-Kutiyana,

I. No.


1 Excavation for Foundation including

dewatering & depositing the excavated

material as and where directed with

a lead of 100 mt and all lift etc. comp.

a) Loose or Soft Soil

b) Dense or Hard Soil

c) Hard Murrum

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 13 Sr. No. 3

2

2

2

6.37

5.17

2.31

0.60

0.60

0.45

1.22

1.22

0.23

9.33

7.57

0.48

6.95

6.95

3.47

CMT

CMT

CMT

57.00

70.00

114.00

396.10

486.44

396.10


86

2 S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 16 Sr. No. 3

P & L C.C.-1:3:6 and curing comp.

(A) Foundation & plinth

2

2

2

1

6.37

5.17

2.31

5.54

0.60

0.60

0.46

5.54

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.08

1.15

0.93

0.32

2.30 4.70

CMT

1758.00

8258.82

3 U.C.R. masonry with hard stone of approved

quality in foundation & plinth in C.M. 1:6 incl.

levelling up etc. comp. (i) C.M. 1:6

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 28 Sr. No. 1

2

2

6.37

5.17

0.45

0.45

1.52

1.52

8.71

7.07 15.79 CMT 1473.00 23253.84

4

P & L C.C. 1:3:6 & curing comp. incl. cost

of form work in (A) walls caps/coping

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 16 Sr. No. 6

2

2

6.37

5.17

0.45

0.45

0.15

0.15

0.86

0.70 1.56 CMT 2256.00 3514.62


87

5 Filling available excavated earth in trenches

plinth, sides of foundation etc. comp.

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 14 Sr. No. 6 1 5.54 5.54 0.30 9.21 9.21 CMT 29.90 275.30

6 White stone bela masonary block in course

in super structure in C.M. 1:6 etc. comp.

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 29 Sr. No. 11

4

4

4

2

2

2

2

0.46

0.23

0.46

6.00

5.54

2.31

2.31

0.23

0.23

0.23

0.23

0.23

0.45

0.23

3.20

3.20

3.20

0.60

0.60

0.15

0.15

1.35

0.68

1.35

1.66

1.53

0.31

0.16 7.04 CMT 2530.00 17815.96

7 P & L C.C. 1:2:4 & curing comp. for chejja

,

lintel, beam, Slab etc.

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 17 Sr. No. 11[B]

2

2

1

4

6.37

5.17

6.00

6.46

0.23

0.23

6.00

0.45

0.45

0.45

0.14

0.14

1.32

1.07

5.04

1.63 9.06 CMT 2524.00 22859.11


88

8 Cold twised steel rein forcement for RCC

work incl. bending, etc comp.

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 18 Sr. No. 14(A)

4

160

42

42

168

16

6.00

0.38

6

6

0.45

6.46

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

24.00

60.80

252.00

252.00

75.60

103.36

14.88

23.71

156.24

156.24

46.872

40.3104 438.25 KG 50.00 21912.72

9 Providing 15 mm thick cement plaster for

interior plastering finished even & smooth

in c.m.-1:3

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 55 Sr. No. 2(i)

8

4

1

8

4

3.20

3.20

5.54

2.31

5.54

0.23

0.45

5.54

0.23

0.30

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

5.89

5.76

30.69

4.25

6.65 53.24 SMT 85.00 4525.23


89

10 20 mm thick sandfaced cement plaster on

walls consisting of 12mm thick backing coat

of c.m. 1:3 & 8mm thick finishing coat of

c.m. 1:1

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 56 Sr. No. 9(i)

4

4

8

8

4

4

4

2

2

6.37

6.00

0.45

0.23

0.45

1.00

6.00

6.00

5.54

0.45

0.15

3.20

3.20

3.20

6.46

0.30

1.45

1.45

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

11.47

3.60

11.52

5.89

5.76

25.84

7.20

17.40

16.07 104.74 SMT 152.00 15920.48

11 P & L C.C. 1:2:4 laid in one layer finished

with a floating coat of a neat cement

(B) 50 mm thick

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 49 Sr. No. 15(B)

1 5.54 5.54 0.00 30.69 30.69 SMT 167.00 5125.50

12

Providing cement Vata (10 cm x 10 cm size)

quater round in cement mortam 1:1 4 5.54 0.00 0.00 22.16

22.16

RMT

15.80

350.128


90

incl

neat cemet finishing. watering etc. comp.

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 57 Sr. No. 15

13 P & F polythelene pipe to wall celling & floor


E) 50mm dia

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 72 Sr. No. 4(E)

2 2.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 4.00 RMT 109.00 436

Total Net Rs. :: >>

125526.34

Say Net Rs. :: >>

125525/-


91

Table no.35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)


92

S.

No.

Name of

villages

Initiation of

village level

institution

Capacity

building

IEC

activities

Baseline

survey

Hydro-

geological

survey

Identifying

technical

support

agencies

Any other

(please

specify)

Estimated

Cost (Rs. in

lakh)

1 Junej 0.6 1.47 0.6 0.17 0.07 0.6 0.07 3.58

2 Bhadula 0.11 0.27 0.11 0.03 0.01 0.13 0.01 0.67

3 Bhogsar 0.53 1.35 0.53 0.16 0.09 0.53 0.07 3.26

4 Jamra 1.72 4.38 1.72 0.54 0.23 1.72 0.2 10.51

5 Kadegi 1.97 4.96 1.97 0.59 0.26 1.97 0.17 11.89

6 Kotda 1.64 4.06 1.64 0.49 0.22 1.64 0.14 9.83


93

Table no.36: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

Sl.

No.

Village

name Type of structures

Proposed target

Augmentation/ repair of

existing structures Construction of new structures Total target

No.

Area to

be

irrigated

(ha)

Storage

capacity

cmt

Estimated

cost No.

Area to

be

irrigated

(ha)

Storage

capacity

cmt

Estimated

cost

Area to

be

irrigated

(ha)

Storage

capacity

cmt

Estimated

cost

Junej

(i) New pond - - - - 1 75 14175 8.93 75 14175 8.93

(ii) Recharging of

Pond 2 54 10170 6.41 1 10 1800 1.13 64 11970 7.54

(iii) Causeway - - - - 4 33 - 3.94 33 - 3.94

(iv) New Pond 1 38 7075 5.38 38 7075 5.38

Total 2 54 10170 6.41 7 156 23050 19.38 210 33220 25.79


94

BHADULA

(i) Deepening of

Pond 1 61 11520 7.26 1 75 14175 8.93 136 25695 16.19

(ii) Check Dam - - - - 2 86 456000 10.32 86 456000 10.32

(iii) H.P. Culvert 1 13 - 1.50 13 - 1.68

Total 1 61 11520 7.26 4 174 470175 20.75 235 481695 28.19

Bhogsar

(i) Deepening of

Pond 1 158 30000 18.90 - - - - 158 30000 18.90

(ii) Earthen bund 1 34 6400 4.03 44 8140 4.03

Total 1 158 30000 18.90 1 34 6400 4.03 202 38140 22.93


95

JAMARA

(i) New Pond 1 61 11520 7.26 3 183 34560 21.78 244 46080 29.04

(ii) Check Dam - - - - 2 43.02 228000 10.32 43.02 228000 10.32

(iii) earthen bund 1 12.99 2475 1.56 12.99 2475 1.56

Total 1 61 11520 7.26 6 239.01 265035 33.66 300.01 276555 40.92

KADEGI

(i) New Pond 3 129.34 24338 15.52 1 236.25 45000 28.35 365.59 474338 43.87

(ii) Earthen bund 1 4.33 825 0.52 - - - - 4.33 825 0.52

(iii) Cause Way - - - - 1 5.90 - 0.71 5.90 - 0.71

(iv)Check Dam - - - - 1 43.02 228000 5.16 43.02 228000 5.16

Total 4 133.67 25163 16.04 3 312.17 273000 34.22 418.84 703163 50.26


96

KOTADA

(i) New Pond 3 323.27 61575 38.79 0 0 0 0 323.27 61575 38.79

(ii) Cause Way - - - - 4 41.63 - 5.00 41.63 - 5.00

Total 7 364.90 61575 43.79 0 0 0 0 364.90 61575 43.79


97

EXCAVATION OF NEW POND, AT –JAMRA, TA- KUTIYANA,.

I. No.


1 Excavation for foundation to all soil

incliding dewatering and disposing

excavated stuff materials as and

where directed within a lead of

100.00mts. and lift up to 0.00 mts

to 1.50 mts

(Loose or Soft Soil)

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 13 Sr. No. 1( A )

1 180.00 32.00 2.00

1

1

1

4608

4608

2304

CMT

CMT

CMT

47.00

60.00

101.00

216576

276480

232704

Excavation in Loose or Soft Soil 40% of Total 4608

Excavation in Dense or Hard Soil 40% of Total

4608

Excavation in Hard -Murrum 20% of Total 2304

Total Net Rs. 725760


98

EXCAVATION OF PAAT VARU POND, AT –KOTDA, TA- KUTIYANA,.

I. No. I t e m Description No Length Width Depth Qty. T. Qty. Unit Rate Amount

1 Excavation for foundation to all soil

incliding dewatering and disposing

excavated stuff materials as and

where directed within a lead of

100.00mts. and lift up to 0.00 mts.

to 1.50 mts

(Loose or Soft Soil)

S.O.R.-2008/09 page No. 13 Sr. No. 1( A )

1 125.00 160.00 1.50

1

1

1

12000

12000

6000

CMT

CMT

CMT

47.00

60.00

101.00

564000

720000

606000

Excavation in Loose or Soft Soil 40% of Total

12000

Excavation in Dense or Hard Soil 40% of Total 12000

Excavation in Hard -Murrum 20% of Total 6000

Total Net Rs.

1890000


99

Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas

S. No. Names of

Villages

Major activities of the SHGs

Name of activity No. of SHGs involved Average annual income from

activity per SHG (Rs. in Lakhs)

1 Junej

Ground Nuts Processing 1 2.50

Mandap service 1 1.75

Chiko plantatio 1 0.75

2 Bhadula Papad Manufactring 1 0.50

Handicraft 2 0.75

3 Bhogsar Santing 1 0.50

4 Jamra Handicraft 2 0.75


5 Kadegi


Animal Husbandary 2 2.50

Paper Making Items 1 0.75

6 Kotda

Santing 1 0.50

Decoration 1 0.55

Papad manufacturing 1 0.25

Chitafal plantation


100

Table no. 39: Other activities of watershed works phase – Proposed target

S.

No.

Name of

villages

Ridge

area

treatment

Drainage

line

treatment

Nursery

raising

Land

development

Crop

demonstrations

Pasture

development

Fishery

development

Non-

conventional

energy

Any other

(please

specify)

Total

Estimated

cost (Rs.

In lakhs) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b)

1 Junej 4 3.94 3 7.53 - - 2 14.31 1 0.15 1 4.00 - - - 0.00 - - 29.79

2 Bhadula 2 10.32 1 4.00 1 3.00 4 20.75 5 0.75 2 8.00 - - 5 1.60 30 10.77 59.20

3 Bhogsar - - 1 4.03 - - 1 18.90 2 0.30 1 4.00 - - - - - - 27.23

4 Jamra 2 10.32 1 1.56 1 3.00 4 29.04 10 1.50 3 8.60 5 1.60 75 32.00 87.62

5 Kadegi 2 8.87 1 0.52 4 43.87 5 0.15 1 2.00 30 10.77 63.03

6 Kotda 4 5.00 1 3.00 3 38.79 5 0.15 1 4.00 30 10.77 60.79


101

Table no.40: Details of engineering structures in watershed works*

S. No.

Village name

Name of structures

Type of treatment Type of land Executing agency Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage

line

(D)

(iii)

Land dev. (L)

(i)

Pri-vate

(ii) Communit

y

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG

(ii)SHG

(iii) Others (pl. specify)

No. of units (No./

cu.m./ rmt)

Estimated cost (Rs. in lakh)

Expected month & year of

completion

(mm/yyyy) M W O T

1 Junej

(i) Pond L C DWDU 1 8.93 May- 2012

(ii ) Canal D C DWDU 3 7.54 June-2012

(iii) Causeway D C DWDU 4 3.94 Jan.-2013

Total

2 BHADULA (i) Pond L C DWDU 1 7.26 May- 2012

(ii) Check Dam D C DWDU 1 5.16 Jan.-2013


102

(iii) Snanghat L C DWDU 1 1.50

Total

3 Bhogsar (i) Pond L C DWDU 1 18.90 May- 2012

(ii) Canal D C DWDU 2 5.12 Jan.-2013

Any others (pl. specify)

Total

4 jamara (i) Pond L C DWDU 1 7.26 May- 2012

(ii) Cause way D C DWDU 1 1.68 Jan.-2013

(iii) Snanghat L C DWDU 1 1.50

Total

5 kadegi (i) Pond L C DWDU 4 May- 2012

(ii) Canal

D C DWDU 1 May-


103

2012

(iii) Causeway D C DWDU 1 Jan.-2013

(iv) Check Dam L C DWDU 1 Jan.-2013


Total

6 kotada (i) Pond L C DWDU 3 38.79 May- 2012

(iii) Causeway D C DWDU 4 5.00 Jan.-2013


Total

-


104

Table no.41: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works

S. No.

Name of village

Name of structure/ work

Type of treatment Type of land Executing agency Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage

line

(D)

(iii) Land dev. (L)

(i) Private

(ii) Community

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG

(ii)SHG

(iii) Others (pl.

specify)

Area (ha)

No. of plants

Estimated cost

(Rs. in lakh)

Expected month & year of

completion (mm/ yyyy)

Bhadula Afforestation L C SHG 10 16000 4,04320

Sitaphal Plantatio L C UGS 2 500 1,25,000

Horticulture L P SHG 5 2000 1,50,000

Bhogsar Afforestation L C DWDU 5 312 90,000

Pasture Development L C SHG 1

Ha. 26000

Fruit tree plantation L P Prirvte 1.5

Ha. 60,000

Jamra Afforestation L C DWDU 5 312 90,000


105


Ha. 26000


Ha. 60,000

kadegi Afforestation L C DWDU 5 312 90,000


Ha. 26000


Ha. 60,000

Kotada Afforestation L C DWDU 10 625 4,04320 May- 2012


Ha. 26000


Ha. 60,000


106

Table no.42: Details of allied / other activities

S. No. Name of village Name of activity

Type of land Executing agency Target

(i) Private (ii) Community (iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG

(iii) Others (pl. specify)

Estimated cost

(Rs. in lakh)

Expected month & year of completion

(mm/yyyy)

1 Juenj Production System & Micro Enterprise

Crop demonstration Plot P Individual 0.50

Veterinary Kit (50) P Individual 0.45

Floriculture Demo. C SHG Individual 0.25

Haybird Seeds Districbution P SHG Individual Individual Individual

0.80

Kitchen Gardening 57nos. X900 P 0.51

Tailoring Machine P Individual 0.35 Dairy development C SHG 1.35 Livelly Hood Activity Nursery Rising C SHG 0.40 Vermi Compost net house unit C SHG 0.50

Animal Husbandary (Bafflow Unit) SHG 5.40

Ground Nuts Processing SHG 2.40

Chiko plantation C UG 0.75

Total 13.71


107

2 Bhadula Production System & Micro Enterprise


Floriculture Demo. C SHG Individual 0.50 Kitchen Gardening 89 nos. X900 P Individual 0.80 Tailoring Machine P Individual 1.00 Mandap Services P SHG 1.50 Canting service C SHG 1.00 Dairy development C SHG 1.50

Leafplate & Cup Making Machine SHG 2.80

SHG Revolving Fund SHG 0.10

Veterinary Kits ( 110) Individual 1.00

Livelly Hood Activity

Nursery Rising C SHG 0.90

Vermi Compost net house unit C SHG 0.90



Sitaphal plantatio C UG 1.25 Papad Making C SHG 0.50

Roof Water Harvesting Structure C SHG 1.80

Chaff cutter 50 nos. X 2000 UG 1.00

Total 25.85


108

3 Bhogsar Production System & Micro Enterprise


Veterinary Kit (50) 0.45

Floriculture Demo. C SHG Individual 0.50 Haybird Seeds Districbution P 0.80 Kitchen Gardening 57nos. X900 P Individual 0.51 Tailoring Machine P Individual 0.35 Dairy development C SHG 1.35 Canting Material C SHG 0.93 Livelly Hood Activity




Chiko plantatio C UG 0.77

Total 12.51

4 Jamra Production System & Micro Enterprise


Veterinary Kit (90) 0.82

Floriculture Demo. C SHG Individual 1.00 Haybird Seeds Districbution P 1.10

Kitchen Gardening 125 nos. X900 P Individual 1.13

Tailoring Machine P Individual 1.50


109

Decoration P SHG 1.50 Santing C SHG 1.00 Dairy development C SHG 1.60


Lift Irrigation Equipment SHG 0.75

Farm Bunding P Individual 1.00

De-worming

P Individual 1.19





Chiko plantatio C UG 0.90 Papad Making C SHG 0.50

Roof Water Harvesting

Structure C SHG 1.21


Floor Mil P Individual 1.10

Snake Preparation P SHG 0.80

Individual Bio – Gas P Individual 4.00

Total 40.31


110

5 Kadegi Production System & Micro Enterprise


Veterianary Kit (50) P Individual 0.45

Floriculture Demo. C SHG Individual 0.50 Kitchen Gardening 89 nos. X900 P Individual 0.80 Tailoring Machine P Individual 1.00 Mandap Services P SHG 1.00 Santing C SHG 0.50 Dairy development C SHG 1.30







Lamon Plantion (2 Hect.) C UG 2.70 Papad Making C SHG 0.25 SHG Revolving Fund C SHG 0.50


Total 23.45

6 Kotda

Production System & Micro Enterprise



111

Floriculture Demo. C SHG Individual 0.50 Haybird Seeds Districbution P 0.80 Kitchen Gardening 89 nos. X900 P Individual 0.80 Tailoring Machine P Individual 1.00 Decoration P SHG 1.00 Canting Matrial C SHG 0.50 Dairy development C SHG 1.35 Leafplate & Cup Making Machine SHG 2.80

Veterinary Kit (50) C 0.45 Livelly Hood Activity Nursery Rising C SHG 0.90



Animal Camp / AI/ Exposure (9) Individual 3.70

Sitaphal plantation C UG 1.25 Papad Making C SHG 0.25


Total 23.58


112

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas

S. No. Name(s) of the villages

CPR particulars Activity proposed Target Target area under the activity

(ha) Estimated expenditure

(Rs.) Expected no. of

beneficiaries

1 Junej

West Land Pasture

Development 1 Ha. 0.26 SHG

Pond 78 Ha. 8.93 Total Villegers

2 Bhadula West Land Afforatration 10 Ha. 4.04 SHG/UG

Sitaphal Plantation 2 Ha. 1.25 SHG Pond 78 8.93 Total Villegers

3 Bhogsar

West Land Afforatration 5 Ha. 0.90 SHG Pasture

Development 1 Ha. 0.26 SHG

Pond 157.50 18.90 Total Villergers

4 Jamra


Development 1 Ha. 0.26 SHG\UG

Pond 60.50 7.26 Total Villergers

5 Kadegi



Pond 236.25 Ha. 28.35 Total Villergers

6 Kotda

West Land Afforatration 10 Ha. 4.04 SHG\UG Pasture


Pond 323.25 Ha. 38.79 Total Villgers


113

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution:

S. No.

Name of the Training Institute

Full Address with contact no.,

website & e-mail

Type of Institute#

Area(s) of speciali-zation$

Accredita-tion details

Trainings

Reference Year No. of trainings assigned

No. of trainees to be trained

1 KVK PORBNDAR Research Institution

Agriculture, Animal

Husbandry, Horticulture

GOI 2011-2014 4 600

2 Junagadh Agriculture University

Junagadh University

Agriculture, Animal

Husbandry, Horticulture

GOI 2011-14 2 130

3 BISAG Gandhinagar Space Application

Remote Sensing &

GIS GOG 2010-2015 3 6

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan:

S. No. Name of Project Project Stakeholders Total no. of

persons No. of persons to be

trained No. of training programmes Estimated cost

1 Kadegi

PIA 6 6 2 0.48 WDTs 5 5 2 0.38 UGs 746 55 8 12.17

SHGs 297 297 5 10.52 WCs 78 78 5 1.40 GPs 72 72 2 1.44

Community 132 132 5 3.92 Total 30.31


114

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities:

S. No. Activity Executing agency Estimated expenditure (Rs.) Outcome (may quantify, wherever possible)

1 KitchenCraning Horticulture Department 0.90 SHG can do without investment activates

2 Pepet Show DWDU, Porbandar 1.00 Awareness for the impotent of Watershed Projects

3 Slogan, DWDU, Porbandar 1.50 4 Others Community Groups DWDU, Porbandar 3.00 5 Banner, Hording, Pamphlet DWDU, Porbandar 2.00


115


116

Table no. 47: Village Wise- Activity wise Budget

Sl

no Village

Activity

EPA Institution

and CB DPR

Watershed

development

Work

Livelihood

for asset

less

Production

system and

Microenterprises

Consolidation

1 Junej 2.38 2.98 0.59 29.79 5.96. 7.74 2.97

2 Bhadula 4.49 5.61 1.12 56.20 11.23 14.61 5.62

3 Bhogsar 2.18 2.72 0.54 27.21 5.44 7.07 2.72

4 Jamra 7.01 8.76 1.75 87.62 17.52 22.78 8.76

5 Kadegi 4.08 5.10 1.02 50.99 10.20 13.24 5.10

6 Kotda 4.10 5.12 1.02 51.26 10.25 13.33 5.13


117

Table no. 48: Budget at a Glance

No Village Project area (Ha)

Total Fund In Lakhs

Administrative costs

Monitoring

Evaluation

Entry Point

activity

Institution and

C apacity Building

Detailed Project Report

Watershed Development Works

Livelihood

activities for asset

less

Production

systems and

micro-enterpris

es

C onsolidation

phase

Total

10% 1% 1% 4% 5% 1% 50% 10% 13% 5% 100%1 J unej 496.6 59.59 5.96 0.60 0.60 2.38 2.98 0.60 29.80 5.96 7.75 2.98 59.592 Bhadula 936.6 11.24 1.12 0.11 0.11 0.45 0.56 0.11 5.62 1.12 1.46 0.56 11.243 Bhogsar 453.4 54.41 5.44 0.54 0.54 2.18 2.72 0.54 27.20 5.44 7.07 2.72 54.414 J amra 1460.4 175.25 17.52 1.75 1.75 7.01 8.76 1.75 87.62 17.52 22.78 8.76 175.255 Kadegi 1651.8 198.22 19.82 1.98 1.98 7.93 9.91 1.98 99.11 19.82 25.77 9.91 198.226 Kotda 1365.6 163.87 16.39 1.64 1.64 6.55 8.19 1.64 81.94 16.39 21.30 8.19 163.87


118

Table no.49: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes

S. No.

Names of Departments with

Schemes converging with

IWMP

Fund made available to IWMP

due to convergence (Rs.

in lakh)

Was this fund included in Rs.12,000/

15,000 per ha.

Name of activity/task/structure undertaken with converged funds Reference no. of

activity/ task/ structure in DPR

Level at which decision for

convergence was taken Yes No

(a) Structures (b) livelihoods

(c ) Any other (pl. specify)

1 MGNREGAS 18.00 NO Structure 3 District 2 SGSY 7.50 No SHG Activites 3 District 3 DIC 1.25 No. Livelihoods 2 District 4 WASMO 12.00 Yes Structure 250 State 5 Forest Department 6.10 No Structure 600 Rmt. District


119


120

6.1 Expected Outcomes 6.1.1 Employment Employment has always been a problem in the village. The principal occupations of the people are dry land agriculture,

animal husbandry and casual labour work. However, rain fall being very limited and erratic, agriculture suffers, i.e. at best

they can take only a single crop, which keeps them partially engaged for about 4 months. Lack of fodder makes animal

husbandry very difficult too. So, animal husbandry does not keep them engaged full time. Thus the people mainly depend

upon casual labour, either in the village itself or outside it.

The project plans for creation of both wage employment and self employment opportunities. Wage employment would be

created by engaging people in watershed physical works like construction of earthen bunds, farm bunds, village pond,

plantation, etc. Self employment would be created by providing the people with cash support in the form of direct livelihood

activities like agriculture, animal husbandry and enterprise development.


121

Table no. 51: Employment in Project area:

S. NO.

Names of

Villages

Wage employment Self employment No. of mandays No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries

SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total 1 Junej 5130 - 19980 3420 28530 57 - 222 38 317 5 - 30 12 47

2 Bhadula 6120 - 27180 2250 35550 68 - 302 25 395 8 - 26 15 59 3 Bhogsar 3600 - 19440 1620 24660 40 - 216 18 274 8 - 20 13 41 4 Jamra 5130 - 53190 2250 60570 57 - 591 25 673 10 - 74 17 101 5 Kadegi 8730 - 99720 4950 113400 97 - 1108 55 1260 7 - 166 15 188 6 Kotda 15750 - 140310 7200 163260 175 - 1559 80 1814 25 - 179 67 271


122

6.1.2.Migration

Low rainfall results in very little fodder availability in the locality. The relatively well off farmers bring fodder from Kadegi

(approximately 100kms away) collectively; but the resource poor cannot afford it. On account of agriculture and animal

husbandry providing only part time employment for some part of the year, the people migrate for a better half of the year

for wage labour.

Employment opportunities in the local area as mentioned above will ensure lessening seasonal migration from the area.

Table no. 52: Details of seasonal migration from Project area

Sl. No. Names of villages

No. of persons migrating No. of days per year of migration

Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post project

1 Junej 58 11 90 20

2 Bhadula 140 28 90 35

3 Bhogsar 65 13 90 22

4 Jamra 250 50 90 40

5 Kadegi 245 49 90 38

6 Kotda 550 95 90 55

6.1.3 Ground water table


123

Rainfall has been average but every year water logging & salinity problem has been increasing all the time. The ground water table thus

has depleted over the years. Presently it stands at 25 m. Proper water harvesting structures and percolation tanks would go a long way in

increasing water table depth from 25-30 m in the pre-project level to 10-15 m in the post project period. & water quality will be good as

well as pre – project time

Table no. 53: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters)

S. No. Names of Villages Sources Pre-Project level Expected Increase/decrease (Post- Project)

1 Junej Depend upon Monsoon

25-30 mt (water Quality not good)

10-15 mt

2 Bhadula Depend upon

Monsoon

3 Bhogsar Depend upon

Monsoon

4 Jamra Depend upon

Monsoon

5 Kadegi Depend upon

Monsoon

6 Kotda Depend upon

Monsoon


124

6.1.4 Drinking water The villages has not own dirinking water source they have to depend upon other village known as Paswari. This

village’s water quality too bad that why many people suffer form various problems like kidny stone, joint pain & many sline

water’s related problems

As a result of the watershed activities, it is expected that the quantity and quality of drinking water would improve.

Table no. 54: Status of Drinking water

S. No.

Names of Villages

Availability of drinking water (no. of months in a year) Quality of drinking water

Comments Pre-project Expected Post project Pre-project Expected Post-

project 1 Junej

9 M onths 12 Months Saline with high TDS Potable

2 Bhadula 3 Bhogsar 4 Jamra 5 Kadegi 6 Kotda


125

6.1.5 Crops

Agriculture primarily depends upon water; but this is what is lacking in Kadegi Project. The surface water is scanty

due to average or high rainfall and ground water is saline, which is unfit for crop production.

All this can change with the integrated land and water management during the watershed project. The planned

earthen bunds would prevent the saline water from the Sea of Arb sagar to mix with the sweet rain water and also help

percolate sweet water underground, and preserve some moisture in the soil. This will help in additional area coming under

cultivation and increasing productivity too. The farmers can take more than one season of crops. Different varieties of

crops can be taken.

Table no. 55: Details of Kharif crop area and yield in the project areas

Name of Project Name of crops

Pre-project Expected Post-project

Area (ha) Average Yield (Qtl) per ha. Area

(ha) Average Yield per ha

(qtl)

Kadegi

Kharif Ground Nut 2691.93 235.2505 270.5380

Rabi Juwar 1961.85 122.5193 142.1224 Chana 1079.51 124.9196 146.1560

Zaid - -

Project total 5733.29 482.6894 558.8164


126

Table no. 56: Area under horticulture

S. No. Name of Village Existing area under horticulture (ha) Area under horticulture proposed to be covered through IWMP

1 Junej 0 3 2 Bhadula 0 2 3 Bhogsar 0 5 4 Jamra 0 5 5 Kadegi 0 3 6 Kotda 0 8

6.1.6 Vegetative cover There is negligible area under tree cover. The villages has no forest area . It is planned that 30 ha land to be covered

under new plantation.

Table no. 57: Forest/vegetative cover S. No. Name of Village Existing area under tree cover (ha) Area under tree cover proposed

1 Junej 0 5/28

2 Bhadula 0 5/25

3 Bhogsar 0 5/32

4 Jamra 0 5/29

5 Kadegi 0 5/35

6 Kotda 0 5/40


127

6.1.7 Livestock

The village has quite a good of livestock population. These include cows, bullocks, buffaloes, goats, sheep and camels.

The interventions like provision of good quality cows and buffaloes, the establishment of a fodder bank and other such

related activities would spur up the dairy development in the village. It is expected that the post project period would see a

substantial increase in livestock population and yield from them.

Table no. 58: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.)

S.

No.

Name of

Village Type of Animal

Pre-Project Expected Post-project Remarks

No. Yield Income No. Yield Income

1 Kadegi

Milch-animals 3524 18135 3074775 4125 25987 4085369

Draught Purpose

animals 1006 614955 1154 623455

Animals for other

purpose 1835 409970 2090 469360


128

Table no. 59: Backward-Forward linkages

S. No. Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre-project (no.) During the project (no.) Post-project (no.)

Backward linkages Seed certification Seed supply system 1 1 Fertilizer supply system Pesticide supply system Credit institutions Bank -1 Bank - 2 Water supply Depend upon other villages Own System Extension services KVK KVK Nurseries Not available 6 Nurseries Tools/machinery suppliers Price Support system Labour Any other (please specify) Forward linkages Harvesting/threshing machinery Storage (including cold storage) Road network Transport facilities Markets / Mandis Agro and other Industries Milk and other collection centres Milk Collection Centre -1 1 Labour Any other (please specify) Vermi compost—6 6


129

Logical Framework Analysis Components Activities Outputs Effect Impact

Village Institution Formation

Formation of Watershed Committee, User Group

One Watershed Committee each village

Number of User group depending on the coverage of particular intervention

Project can be implemented and managed in a democratic and participatory way ensuring equity.

Unity and prosperity in the village management

People’s Participation and positive perception towards the programme

Strengthening Village Institutions

Organize training and awareness programme for Village institutions

Capacity building workshops and exposure visits User Group and Watershed Committee

awareness camps to be organized.

trainings and exposure visits UGs and WCs to be held

Quality of management of common resources improved.

Quality of distribution of benefits between people improved.

Increased awareness amongst women about

Unity and prosperity in the village management.

People’s Participation and positive perception towards the programme


130

Failitating and monitoring the functioning of UGs and WCs

Strengthen linkages between UGs and WCs and Pandhayat Institutions.

Gender sensitization of UGs and WCs to increase inclusiveness of samuh decisionmaking.

Sensitize village Communities to involve children and youth in development.

Capacity building workshops to be organized

1 Federation of UGs and WC to be formed.

village resources.

Women participation enhanced in decision – making of GVCs.

Involvement of youth and children in village development increased.


131

Fund Management

Improve management and utilization of UGs and WCs.

Prepare communities to explore other sources of income for UGs and WCs.

UGs and WCs operating bank account and managing resources on their own

Purpose, frequency and volume of use of the fund enhanced.

Volume of funds generated for UGs and WCs from other sources of income increased.

Impart trainings, conduct meetings and organize exposure visits for communities, village volunteers and staff to effectively plan, execute and monitor activies

Identification and promotion of nontimber forest produce based income generatation activities

Income generation intervention promoted

Rainfed Area Development

Treatment of land through improved soil and moisture conservation practices on watershed basis

Land to be brought under improved soil moisture conservation practices

Improved productivity of treated land

Increase in proportion of households having more security of food


132

Promotion of good agricultural practices horticulture, improved crop and vegetable

Promotion of organic farming practices

Good agricultural practices to be promoted

Organic farming to be promoted

Fodder banks to be established

Agriculture based livelihood income generation activities to be promoted

Increased availability of water in wells

Increase in annual agriculture production

Farmers adopt organic farming practices

Fodder security of farmers enhanced.

Increase in contribution of agricultural income to the household income.


133

Formation of Fodder banks to increase fodder security and promote dairy development among communities

Identification and promotion of agriproduce based income generation activities like grading, processing and packaging.

Promotion of better Irrigation practices like drip irrigation

Impart training, conduct meetings and organize exposure visits of communities, village volunteers and staff to effectively plan, execute and monitor activities.

Water harvesting structures to be constructed

Drip Irrigation facilities to be distributed among farmers

Approx 12000 person days of employment to be generated

Trainings, exposure visits and meetings to be organized for communities, village volunteers and staff

Increase availability of water for 9 to 12 month

Increased availability of water for livestock

Availability of irrigation water established

Farmers take two crops in a year.

Increase in agricultural productivity of land

Availability of drinking


134

water enhanced

Women’s Sociopolitical and economic empowerment

Formation & Strengthening of women’s SHG Groups

Capacity building of womenfolk

Capacity building of SHG leaders and accountants

Linking SHGs with external financial

Women’s SHG Groups to be formed

Federation of Women’s SHGs to be formed

Training to be conducted for preparation of woollen products from sheep and goats

Enhanced capacities of leaders of women’s groups in taking initiatives to solve problems at different levels.

Improved access to credit for livelihood purposes.

Increased household income.

Position of women in household, community, society (Politically, socially and economically) as perceived by women and community at large

Performance enhancement of SHGs in terms of participation, decisionmaking leadership and fund management

Equality & Equity in gender relations at home (decision making, expenditure, children’ education, health)


135


136

7 Quality and Sustainability Issues

7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation

A Web-based GIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the project in its planning & implementation

phases. The system would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project.

The system shows the entire state of Gujarat and all of those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the

user to zoom onto one particular project. Details related to soil type, Land-use classification, inhabitation etc., can be

obtained village-wise. Furthermore, survey-number wise details related to ownership, irrigation source, yield etc., can also

be accessed by the users of the system. This system is being used for pooling up the details obtained from the DPR. In

other words, the DPR is made available online in the form of a database which will help the stakeholders know areas of

importance viz., already treated areas/historical works in the area, proposed areas for treatment etc., for further treatment

and planning. The system would also show the satellite imageries of various years from the project inception stage to the

project closing stages. This allows the user to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment and thereby plan corrective

measures for the project area. The system would serve as an aiding tool to the planners and evaluators for judging the

efficacy of the project.


137

Yet another component of the Web-based GIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help

the ground staff alias WDTs (Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central

server. Also, any higher-up official in charge of the project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile

phone by means of an SMS. The system works in the following manner. The WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks

the latitude-longitude information of various treatment areas during the DPR. The probable sites are then transferred onto

the central server. During the works phase, any progress in the treatment areas is reported to the server by means of an

SMS by the WDT. Similarly, any nodal officer or higher-up official can view the progress in a project by means of

summarized reports generated over frequent periods of time.

7.2 Plans for Project management:

The Project management of any watershed programme is very important. It mainly depends upon the community

organisation and the village level institutes. In Kansabad project, watershed committee, various user groups and SHGs

have been formulated for post project operation and maintenance of assets created during project period. Major emphasis

will be on equity and sustainable benefit of the project even after implementation stage. A proper link-up will be built during

project period with various institutes and capacity building organisation. They will act as a major kingpin during post

implementation for scaling up the successful experience during project.


138

7.3 Watershed Development Fund:

The major source of financial assistance after post implementation period is watershed Development Fund. The

contribution of it will comes mainly fund the following:

7.4 User Charges:

Various user groups will be formed in village. These user groups will collect user charges according to the designated rules

formed during the formation of user group. These funds will be transferred to the WDF funds as per these formulated rules.

The secretary of watershed committee (WC) shall maintain the records of the following.


139


140

Micro Watershed Map of Porbandar District


141

Priority Map Of Porbandar District


142

Baseline Map Of IWMP-1 Cluster Project Porbandar District


143

Action Plan Map Of IWMP-1 Cluster Project of Village : Bhadula, Porbandar District


144

Action Plan Map Of IWMP-1 Cluster Project of Village : Bhogsar, Porbandar District


145

Action Plan Map Of IWMP-1 Cluster Project of Village : Jamra, Porbandar District


146

Action Plan Map Of IWMP-1 Cluster Project of Village : Junej, Porbandar District


147

Action Plan Map Of IWMP-1 Cluster Project of Village : Kadegi, Porbandar District


148

Action Plan Map Of IWMP-1 Cluster Project of Village : Kotda, Porbandar District


149

Ground Water Map


150

Landuse Map


151

River Waterbody Map


152

Slop Map


153

Soil Map

Date post:	12-Mar-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	2 times
Download:	0 times

District Watershed Development Unit -...

Documents